The most recent 12 months moved against the better direction, whatever the longer window shows. The checks below judge the multi-year window. It is also worsening faster than most of the selected peers.
Violent crime rose about 5% over the 12 months ending May 2026, faster than 74% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 456 (Apr 26) | -9.3% | |||||
| Redmond, WA | 67 (May 26) | 3rd | -51.3% | 1st | 63% below peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 55 (May 26) | 2nd | -47.0% | 2nd | 70% below peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 35 (May 26) | 1st | -35.5% | 3rd | 81% below peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 181 (Apr 26) | 13th | -25.9% | 4th | on par with peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 177 (May 26) | 12th | -21.1% | 5th | 2% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 210 (May 26) | 14th | -18.4% | 6th | 16% above peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 145 (May 26) | 9th | -17.3% | 7th | 20% below peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 89 (May 26) | 6th | -14.5% | 8th | 51% below peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 547 (May 26) | 21st | -13.2% | 9th | 202% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 586 (Feb 26) | 22nd | -13.1% | 10th | 224% above peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 112 (May 26) | 7th | -5.6% | 11th | 38% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 68 (May 26) | 4th | -5.5% | 12th | 63% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 131 (Apr 26) | 8th | -2.9% | 13th | 28% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 334 (May 26) | 17th | -0.4% | 14th | 85% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 151 (May 26) | 10th | -0.2% | 15th | 17% below peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 174 (May 26) | 11th | +3.7% | 16th | 4% below peers | ||
| Scranton, PA | 316 (May 26) | 16th | +4.8% | 17th | 75% above peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 463 (May 26) | 19th | +5.2% | 18th | 156% above peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 771 (Apr 26) | 24th | +6.5% | 19th | 326% above peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 489 (Dec 25) | 20th | +7.0% | 20th | 170% above peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 418 (May 26) | 18th | +7.6% | 21st | 131% above peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 68 (May 26) | 5th | +16.7% | 22nd | 62% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 596 (May 26) | 23rd | +31.5% | 23rd | 229% above peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 220 (Apr 26) | 15th | +92.0% | 24th | 22% above peers |
The last 12 months moved in the better direction. The multi-year trend has not (yet) passed the checks below, so no sustained-improvement claim is made. Most of the selected peers are improving faster than this city.
Property crime fell about 1% over the 12 months ending May 2026, slower than 83% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 1,987 (Apr 26) | -12.2% | |||||
| Bethlehem, PA | 1,161 (May 26) | 6th | -35.2% | 1st | 27% below peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 1,594 (May 26) | 13th | -34.7% | 2nd | on par with peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 1,357 (Apr 26) | 11th | -28.2% | 3rd | 15% below peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 1,193 (May 26) | 9th | -22.5% | 4th | 25% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 1,635 (May 26) | 14th | -22.0% | 5th | 3% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 2,095 (Apr 26) | 18th | -21.9% | 6th | 31% above peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 2,703 (May 26) | 22nd | -19.0% | 7th | 70% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 1,080 (May 26) | 4th | -18.4% | 8th | 32% below peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 1,144 (May 26) | 5th | -18.1% | 9th | 28% below peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 2,403 (Feb 26) | 21st | -18.0% | 10th | 51% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 916 (May 26) | 3rd | -17.0% | 11th | 43% below peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 2,298 (May 26) | 20th | -11.1% | 12th | 44% above peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 1,559 (May 26) | 12th | -10.2% | 13th | 2% below peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 546 (May 26) | 2nd | -9.5% | 14th | 66% below peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 516 (May 26) | 1st | -9.3% | 15th | 68% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 2,238 (May 26) | 19th | -7.9% | 16th | 40% above peers | ||
| Scranton, PA | 1,183 (May 26) | 7th | -7.9% | 17th | 26% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 3,602 (May 26) | 23rd | -6.7% | 18th | 126% above peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 2,088 (Dec 25) | 17th | -5.3% | 19th | 31% above peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 1,897 (May 26) | 16th | -1.1% | 20th | 19% above peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 1,220 (May 26) | 10th | +1.0% | 21st | 23% below peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 4,086 (Apr 26) | 24th | +3.3% | 22nd | 156% above peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 1,185 (May 26) | 8th | +6.6% | 23rd | 26% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 1,686 (May 26) | 15th | +35.5% | 24th | 6% above peers |
The last 12 months moved in the better direction. The multi-year trend has not (yet) passed the checks below, so no sustained-improvement claim is made. It is also improving faster than most of the selected peers.
Homicide fell about 100% over the 12 months ending May 2026, faster than 100% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 6 (Apr 26) | -17.8% | |||||
| Wyoming, MI | 0 (May 26) | 1st | -100.0% | 1st | 100% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 0 (May 26) | 2nd | -100.0% | 2nd | 100% below peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 0 (May 26) | 3rd | -100.0% | 3rd | 100% below peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 0 (May 26) | 4th | -100.0% | 4th | 100% below peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 0 (May 26) | 5th | -100.0% | 5th | 100% below peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 1 (May 26) | 11th | -62.9% | 6th | 2% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 3 (Dec 25) | 15th | -59.9% | 7th | 103% above peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 1 (May 26) | 12th | -50.2% | 8th | 1% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 3 (May 26) | 14th | -38.5% | 9th | 98% above peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 4 (May 26) | 17th | -25.1% | 10th | 202% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 1 (May 26) | 13th | -3.8% | 11th | on par with peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 7 (Apr 26) | 22nd | +0.0% | 12th | 482% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 3 (May 26) | 16th | +0.0% | 13th | 106% above peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 1 (Apr 26) | 10th | +0.0% | 14th | 5% below peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 15 (Feb 26) | 24th | +10.0% | 15th | 1046% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 8 (May 26) | 23rd | +199.6% | 16th | 513% above peers | ||
| Scranton, PA | 4 (May 26) | 18th | +200.0% | 17th | 212% above peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 4 (May 26) | 19th | +200.0% | 18th | 217% above peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 6 (May 26) | 21st | +363.8% | 19th | 375% above peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 0 (May 26) | 6th | 100% below peers | ||||
| Schaumburg, IL | 5 (May 26) | 20th | 310% above peers | ||||
| Evanston, IL | 0 (Apr 26) | 7th | 100% below peers | ||||
| Flower Mound, TX | 0 (May 26) | 8th | 100% below peers | ||||
| Milpitas, CA | 0 (May 26) | 9th | 100% below peers |
This badge answers one question: can this city's own trend be trusted as a real improvement? It passed all three checks, so yes. The most recent 12 months agree with the multi-year trend.
Vehicle theft fell about 27% over the 12 months ending May 2026, faster than 57% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 303 (Apr 26) | -22.2% | |||||
| Redmond, WA | 85 (May 26) | 8th | -68.4% | 1st | 30% below peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 58 (Apr 26) | 5th | -64.7% | 2nd | 52% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 55 (May 26) | 4th | -49.4% | 3rd | 55% below peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 30 (May 26) | 2nd | -44.7% | 4th | 76% below peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 182 (May 26) | 19th | -41.1% | 5th | 50% above peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 140 (May 26) | 16th | -39.0% | 6th | 15% above peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 115 (May 26) | 12th | -38.1% | 7th | 5% below peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 94 (May 26) | 10th | -34.2% | 8th | 22% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 85 (May 26) | 9th | -33.7% | 9th | 30% below peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 22 (May 26) | 1st | -28.0% | 10th | 82% below peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 134 (May 26) | 15th | -26.9% | 11th | 11% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 413 (May 26) | 22nd | -23.6% | 12th | 240% above peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 129 (Apr 26) | 14th | -22.7% | 13th | 6% above peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 112 (Dec 25) | 11th | -17.9% | 14th | 8% below peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 312 (Apr 26) | 21st | -17.6% | 15th | 157% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 84 (May 26) | 7th | -17.6% | 16th | 31% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 157 (Apr 26) | 18th | -17.4% | 17th | 30% above peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 662 (May 26) | 24th | -17.0% | 18th | 446% above peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 64 (May 26) | 6th | -13.6% | 19th | 47% below peers | ||
| Scranton, PA | 121 (May 26) | 13th | -12.4% | 20th | on par with peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 154 (May 26) | 17th | -12.2% | 21st | 27% above peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 247 (May 26) | 20th | +15.6% | 22nd | 104% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 418 (Feb 26) | 23rd | +20.6% | 23rd | 245% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 51 (May 26) | 3rd | +37.3% | 24th | 58% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Household income rose about 36% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from $54,328 to $73,677 (each survey's own dollars, not adjusted for inflation) - more than the combined survey margin (±$2,833). 29 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan ref | $72,875 | +28% | |||||
| United States ref | $80,734 | +28% | |||||
| Missoula, MT | $70,392 | 25th | +48% | 1st | 27% below peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | $73,677 | 22nd | +36% | 2nd | 24% below peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | $70,870 | 24th | +35% | 3rd | 27% below peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | $178,798 | 2nd | +35% | 4th | 85% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | $99,861 | 14th | +34% | 5th | 4% above peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | $85,914 | 18th | +33% | 6th | 11% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | $137,697 | 5th | +31% | 7th | 43% above peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | $78,722 | 20th | +31% | 8th | 18% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | $57,740 | 29th | +31% | 9th | 40% below peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | $123,874 | 9th | +28% | 10th | 28% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | $120,694 | 11th | +28% | 11th | 25% above peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | $68,613 | 27th | +27% | 12th | 29% below peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | $107,504 | 12th | +27% | 13th | 11% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | $105,963 | 13th | +26% | 14th | 10% above peers | ||
| Scranton, PA | $50,739 | 31st | +25% | 15th | 47% below peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | $129,545 | 6th | +25% | 16th | 34% above peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | $68,879 | 26th | +23% | 17th | 29% below peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | $84,604 | 19th | +23% | 18th | 12% below peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | $162,560 | 3rd | +23% | 19th | 69% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | $68,166 | 28th | +22% | 20th | 29% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | $96,434 | 16th | +22% | 21st | on par with peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | $71,512 | 23rd | +22% | 22nd | 26% below peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | $121,126 | 10th | +22% | 23rd | 26% above peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | $190,124 | 1st | +22% | 24th | 97% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | $55,504 | 30th | +20% | 25th | 42% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | $126,334 | 7th | +19% | 26th | 31% above peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | $161,235 | 4th | +17% | 27th | 67% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | $97,514 | 15th | +17% | 28th | 1% above peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | $125,310 | 8th | +15% | 29th | 30% above peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | $77,980 | 21st | +12% | 30th | 19% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | $94,390 | 17th | +7% | 31st | 2% below peers |
Moving against the better direction for this metric.
Unemployment rose about 0.3 percentage points a year from 2022 to 2025. That is movement in the wrong direction.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan ref | 5.1% (May 26) | +0.0pp | ||||
| United States ref | 4.2% (Jun 26) | +0.1pp | ||||
| Hammond, IN | 4.1% (May 26) | 16th | -1.2pp | 1st | 2% above peers | |
| Milpitas, CA | 3.5% (May 26) | 5th | -0.7pp | 2nd | 12% below peers | |
| Loveland, CO | 3.5% (May 26) | 6th | -0.6pp | 3rd | 12% below peers | |
| Mableton, GA | 3.2% (May 26) | 3rd | -0.4pp | 4th | 20% below peers | |
| Alameda, CA | 4.0% (May 26) | 15th | -0.3pp | 5th | on par with peers | |
| Pleasanton, CA | 3.7% (May 26) | 11th | -0.3pp | 6th | 7% below peers | |
| Napa, CA | 3.6% (May 26) | 9th | -0.2pp | 7th | 10% below peers | |
| Wyoming, MI | 4.3% (May 26) | 18th | -0.1pp | 8th | 7% above peers | |
| Bellflower, CA | 5.1% (May 26) | 26th | -0.1pp | 9th | 27% above peers | |
| Racine, WI | 3.9% (May 26) | 14th | -0.1pp | 10th | 3% below peers | |
| Chino Hills, CA | 3.4% (May 26) | 4th | -0.1pp | 11th | 15% below peers | |
| Missoula, MT | 2.6% (May 26) | 2nd | -0.1pp | 12th | 35% below peers | |
| Broomfield, CO | 3.6% (May 26) | 10th | -0.1pp | 13th | 10% below peers | |
| Pittsburg, CA | 4.5% (May 26) | 20th | -0.1pp | 14th | 12% above peers | |
| Rapid City, SD | 1.9% (May 26) | 1st | +0.0pp | 15th | 52% below peers | |
| Cedar Park, TX | 3.5% (May 26) | 7th | +0.1pp | 16th | 12% below peers | |
| Mansfield, TX | 4.1% (May 26) | 17th | +0.3pp | 17th | 2% above peers | |
| Missouri City, TX | 4.9% (May 26) | 25th | +0.3pp | 18th | 23% above peers | |
| Woodbury, MN | 3.5% (May 26) | 8th | +0.4pp | 19th | 12% below peers | |
| Flower Mound, TX | 3.7% (May 26) | 12th | +0.5pp | 20th | 7% below peers | |
| Rochester Hills, MI | 3.8% (May 26) | 13th | +0.6pp | 21st | 5% below peers | |
| Evanston, IL | 4.6% (May 26) | 21st | +0.6pp | 22nd | 15% above peers | |
| Redmond, WA | 4.3% (May 26) | 19th | +0.7pp | 23rd | 7% above peers | |
| Schaumburg, IL | 4.7% (May 26) | 22nd | +0.7pp | 24th | 18% above peers | |
| Flagstaff, AZ | 4.7% (May 26) | 23rd | +0.7pp | 25th | 18% above peers | |
| Bethlehem, PA | 4.8% (May 26) | 24th | +0.9pp | 26th | 20% above peers | |
| Scranton, PA | 5.1% (May 26) | 27th | +1.0pp | 27th | 27% above peers | |
| Southfield, MI | 6.8% (May 26) | 28th | +1.2pp | 28th | 70% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is within the margin, but each of the last 4 annual releases moved the 5-year average the same way. Direction is a reliable early signal; its size is not.
Poverty changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (12.0% then, 10.4% now; margin ±2.2pp). The newest releases lean downward: each of the last 4 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan ref | 12.9% | -1.1pp | |||||
| United States ref | 12.0% | ||||||
| Missoula, MT | 11.4% | 22nd | -5.5pp | 1st | 35% above peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 12.0% | 23rd | -3.7pp | 2nd | 42% above peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 10.4% | 18th | -1.6pp | 3rd | 23% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 18.9% | 30th | -2.9pp | 4th | 124% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 11.1% | 21st | -1.7pp | 5th | 32% above peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 5.7% | 7th | -0.8pp | 6th | 32% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 17.9% | 29th | -2.6pp | 7th | 112% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 10.6% | 20th | -1.5pp | 8th | 26% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 5.6% | 6th | -0.7pp | 9th | 33% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 10.1% | 17th | -1.0pp | 10th | 19% above peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 12.4% | 24th | -0.7pp | 11th | 47% above peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 7.1% | 13th | -0.1pp | 12th | 16% below peers | ||
| Scranton, PA | 21.3% | 31st | -0.2pp | 13th | 153% above peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 10.4% | 19th | -0.0pp | 14th | 23% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 6.4% | 11th | +0.0pp | 15th | 24% below peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 14.4% | 27th | +0.1pp | 16th | 70% above peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 8.4% | 16th | +0.2pp | 17th | on par with peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 13.1% | 25th | +0.4pp | 18th | 55% above peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 5.6% | 5th | +0.2pp | 19th | 34% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 8.4% | 15th | +0.5pp | 20th | 1% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 15.4% | 28th | +1.0pp | 21st | 82% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 5.0% | 2nd | +0.3pp | 22nd | 41% below peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 6.1% | 10th | +0.6pp | 23rd | 27% below peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 13.4% | 26th | +2.4pp | 24th | 58% above peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 5.3% | 4th | +1.0pp | 25th | 37% below peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 5.9% | 9th | +1.1pp | 26th | 31% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 7.6% | 14th | +1.6pp | 27th | 10% below peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 4.3% | 1st | +1.3pp | 28th | 49% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 7.0% | 12th | +2.4pp | 29th | 17% below peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 5.8% | 8th | +2.0pp | 30th | 31% below peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 5.2% | 3rd | +2.1pp | 31st | 38% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Child poverty fell 4.6 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 17.8% to 13.2% - more than the combined survey margin (±3.3pp). 8 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan ref | 17.6% | -2.3pp | |||||
| United States ref | 16.1% | ||||||
| Southfield, MI | 5.9% | 8th | -8.2pp | 1st | 36% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 3.8% | 2nd | -4.6pp | 2nd | 59% below peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 8.3% | 13th | -7.6pp | 3rd | 11% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 4.4% | 3rd | -3.4pp | 4th | 53% below peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 5.0% | 4th | -3.7pp | 5th | 46% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 5.3% | 5th | -2.1pp | 6th | 43% below peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 18.1% | 26th | -6.8pp | 7th | 96% above peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 13.2% | 20th | -4.6pp | 8th | 43% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 26.2% | 30th | -8.6pp | 9th | 183% above peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 23.8% | 28th | -6.5pp | 10th | 157% above peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 3.0% | 1st | -0.7pp | 11th | 68% below peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 9.3% | 16th | -1.8pp | 12th | on par with peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 17.1% | 24th | -2.9pp | 13th | 85% above peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 15.8% | 21st | -2.4pp | 14th | 70% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 16.5% | 22nd | -0.3pp | 15th | 78% above peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 23.3% | 27th | +0.1pp | 16th | 151% above peers | ||
| Scranton, PA | 34.4% | 31st | +1.4pp | 17th | 272% above peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 6.5% | 11th | +0.3pp | 18th | 30% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 17.5% | 25th | +1.0pp | 19th | 89% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 8.3% | 14th | +0.9pp | 20th | 11% below peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 6.1% | 9th | +0.7pp | 21st | 34% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 10.0% | 18th | +1.3pp | 22nd | 8% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 11.4% | 19th | +1.6pp | 23rd | 23% above peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 5.5% | 6th | +0.8pp | 24th | 40% below peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 24.4% | 29th | +5.4pp | 25th | 163% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 5.8% | 7th | +1.3pp | 26th | 38% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 9.4% | 17th | +4.0pp | 27th | 1% above peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 16.6% | 23rd | +7.3pp | 28th | 80% above peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 6.7% | 12th | +3.3pp | 29th | 27% below peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 8.3% | 15th | +4.2pp | 30th | 10% below peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 6.2% | 10th | +3.3pp | 31st | 33% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Broadband rose 4.5 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 87.5% to 92.0% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.4pp). 26 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan ref | 90.7% | +8.7pp | |||||
| United States ref | 91.1% | ||||||
| Hammond, IN | 87.3% | 30th | +13.3pp | 1st | 7% below peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 91.3% | 24th | +10.6pp | 2nd | 3% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 89.2% | 26th | +9.9pp | 3rd | 5% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 88.4% | 29th | +8.7pp | 4th | 6% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 91.9% | 23rd | +8.3pp | 5th | 2% below peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 90.5% | 25th | +7.6pp | 6th | 4% below peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 88.6% | 28th | +7.3pp | 7th | 6% below peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 95.6% | 12th | +7.8pp | 8th | 1% above peers | ||
| Scranton, PA | 84.2% | 31st | +6.2pp | 9th | 11% below peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 93.3% | 19th | +6.0pp | 10th | 1% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 94.2% | 16th | +5.0pp | 11th | on par with peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 93.9% | 17th | +4.7pp | 12th | on par with peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 93.4% | 18th | +4.6pp | 13th | 1% below peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 92.0% | 22nd | +4.5pp | 14th | 2% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 95.0% | 15th | +4.4pp | 15th | 1% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 95.6% | 11th | +4.1pp | 16th | 1% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 95.4% | 14th | +3.7pp | 17th | 1% above peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 96.8% | 6th | +3.6pp | 18th | 3% above peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 88.7% | 27th | +3.0pp | 19th | 6% below peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 92.3% | 20th | +3.0pp | 20th | 2% below peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 98.1% | 1st | +3.1pp | 21st | 4% above peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 97.9% | 2nd | +2.8pp | 22nd | 4% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 97.6% | 3rd | +2.7pp | 23rd | 4% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 96.3% | 7th | +2.5pp | 24th | 2% above peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 97.0% | 5th | +2.4pp | 25th | 3% above peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 96.3% | 8th | +2.0pp | 26th | 2% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 96.3% | 9th | +1.7pp | 27th | 2% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 92.1% | 21st | +1.4pp | 28th | 2% below peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 95.8% | 10th | +0.7pp | 29th | 2% above peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 95.5% | 13th | +0.6pp | 30th | 1% above peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 97.4% | 4th | +0.4pp | 31st | 3% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Inequality changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (0.40 then, 0.42 now; margin ±0.03).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan ref | 0.47 | -0.002 | |||||
| United States ref | 0.48 | +0.001 | |||||
| Broomfield, CO | 0.40 | 3rd | -0.034 | 1st | 5% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 0.41 | 7th | -0.030 | 2nd | 3% below peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 0.42 | 10th | -0.024 | 3rd | 2% below peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 0.47 | 26th | -0.021 | 4th | 10% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 0.42 | 11th | -0.019 | 5th | 1% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 0.46 | 24th | -0.018 | 6th | 9% above peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 0.42 | 15th | -0.014 | 7th | on par with peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 0.40 | 1st | -0.010 | 8th | 6% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 0.54 | 31st | -0.013 | 9th | 28% above peers | ||
| Scranton, PA | 0.46 | 25th | -0.010 | 10th | 9% above peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 0.43 | 17th | -0.003 | 11th | 1% above peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 0.47 | 28th | +0.000 | 12th | 12% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 0.44 | 20th | +0.002 | 13th | 5% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 0.44 | 21st | +0.009 | 14th | 5% above peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 0.44 | 19th | +0.012 | 15th | 5% above peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 0.41 | 6th | +0.012 | 16th | 3% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 0.41 | 5th | +0.016 | 17th | 3% below peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 0.42 | 13th | +0.018 | 18th | 1% below peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 0.42 | 12th | +0.018 | 19th | 1% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 0.49 | 30th | +0.023 | 20th | 15% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 0.41 | 9th | +0.022 | 21st | 3% below peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 0.43 | 18th | +0.024 | 22nd | 3% above peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 0.48 | 29th | +0.027 | 23rd | 13% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 0.46 | 23rd | +0.027 | 24th | 8% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 0.41 | 8th | +0.025 | 25th | 3% below peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 0.40 | 2nd | +0.025 | 26th | 5% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 0.47 | 27th | +0.029 | 27th | 12% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 0.42 | 14th | +0.032 | 28th | 1% below peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 0.41 | 4th | +0.033 | 29th | 3% below peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 0.45 | 22nd | +0.041 | 30th | 6% above peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 0.42 | 16th | +0.048 | 31st | on par with peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
SNAP fell 3.3 percentage points between the 2014-2018 and 2019-2023 surveys, from 15.6% to 12.3% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.1pp). 3 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
| Place | Latest2019-2023 survey | Today's rank | Change2014-2018 → 2019-2023 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan ref | 13.1% | -1.0pp | |||||
| United States ref | 11.8% | -0.5pp | |||||
| Missoula, MT | 8.1% | 18th | -4.9pp | 1st | 5% above peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 21.2% | 30th | -6.9pp | 2nd | 175% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 6.7% | 13th | -1.9pp | 3rd | 12% below peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 12.2% | 23rd | -3.3pp | 4th | 59% above peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 10.6% | 21st | -2.2pp | 5th | 38% above peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 10.6% | 20th | -1.3pp | 6th | 38% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 18.6% | 28th | -1.7pp | 7th | 142% above peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 4.1% | 8th | -0.4pp | 8th | 46% below peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 3.4% | 6th | -0.3pp | 9th | 56% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 7.2% | 14th | -0.6pp | 10th | 6% below peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 3.8% | 7th | -0.1pp | 11th | 51% below peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 1.7% | 1st | -0.0pp | 12th | 78% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 9.3% | 19th | -0.1pp | 13th | 21% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 14.8% | 26th | +0.0pp | 14th | 92% above peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 3.2% | 4th | +0.1pp | 15th | 59% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 5.9% | 12th | +0.2pp | 16th | 23% below peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 7.8% | 17th | +0.3pp | 17th | 1% above peers | ||
| Scranton, PA | 26.9% | 31st | +1.1pp | 18th | 249% above peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 18.7% | 29th | +0.8pp | 19th | 143% above peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 13.4% | 24th | +1.0pp | 20th | 75% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 13.7% | 25th | +1.4pp | 21st | 78% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 5.8% | 11th | +0.7pp | 22nd | 25% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 12.2% | 22nd | +2.3pp | 23rd | 59% above peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 17.9% | 27th | +4.6pp | 24th | 133% above peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 2.6% | 2nd | +0.7pp | 25th | 66% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 7.5% | 15th | +2.0pp | 26th | 2% below peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 3.4% | 5th | +1.0pp | 27th | 56% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 7.7% | 16th | +2.9pp | 28th | on par with peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 5.7% | 10th | +2.2pp | 29th | 27% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 4.7% | 9th | +2.8pp | 30th | 40% below peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 3.1% | 3rd | +1.9pp | 31st | 60% below peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers. It is rising faster than most of the selected peers.
Home value rose about 3% over the 12 months ending June 2026, faster than 83% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan ref | $269,972 (Jun 26) | +4.2% | ||||
| United States ref | $372,995 (Jun 26) | +0.8% | ||||
| Evanston, IL | $496,114 (Jun 26) | 15th | +7.7% | 1st | on par with peers | |
| Schaumburg, IL | $363,376 (Jun 26) | 23rd | +4.9% | 2nd | 27% below peers | |
| Racine, WI | $221,388 (Jun 26) | 28th | +4.9% | 3rd | 55% below peers | |
| Bethlehem, PA | $366,727 (Jun 26) | 22nd | +3.7% | 4th | 26% below peers | |
| Rochester Hills, MI | $480,334 (Jun 26) | 16th | +3.6% | 5th | 3% below peers | |
| Wyoming, MI | $296,437 (Jun 26) | 26th | +3.2% | 6th | 40% below peers | |
| Rapid City, SD | $367,620 (Jun 26) | 21st | +1.9% | 7th | 26% below peers | |
| Southfield, MI | $258,802 (Jun 26) | 27th | +1.8% | 8th | 48% below peers | |
| Chino Hills, CA | $993,719 (Jun 26) | 5th | +1.5% | 9th | 100% above peers | |
| Woodbury, MN | $466,549 (Jun 26) | 18th | +1.4% | 10th | 6% below peers | |
| Bellflower, CA | $806,220 (Jun 26) | 7th | +0.9% | 11th | 63% above peers | |
| Missoula, MT | $576,303 (Jun 26) | 11th | +0.9% | 12th | 16% above peers | |
| Hammond, IN | $178,516 (Jun 26) | 30th | +0.7% | 13th | 64% below peers | |
| Flagstaff, AZ | $665,540 (Jun 26) | 8th | -0.5% | 14th | 34% above peers | |
| Carmichael, CA | $565,058 (Jun 26) | 13th | -0.6% | 15th | 14% above peers | |
| Mansfield, TX | $449,169 (Jun 26) | 19th | -1.0% | 16th | 9% below peers | |
| Broomfield, CO | $631,967 (Jun 26) | 9th | -1.3% | 17th | 27% above peers | |
| Loveland, CO | $504,321 (Jun 26) | 14th | -1.4% | 18th | 2% above peers | |
| Alameda, CA | $1,160,754 (Jun 26) | 4th | -1.5% | 19th | 134% above peers | |
| Flower Mound, TX | $616,639 (Jun 26) | 10th | -1.6% | 20th | 24% above peers | |
| Missouri City, TX | $338,546 (Jun 26) | 25th | -1.9% | 21st | 32% below peers | |
| Milpitas, CA | $1,445,017 (Jun 26) | 2nd | -2.0% | 22nd | 191% above peers | |
| Pittsburg, CA | $568,060 (Jun 26) | 12th | -2.6% | 23rd | 15% above peers | |
| Scranton, PA | $205,566 (Jun 26) | 29th | -2.8% | 24th | 59% below peers | |
| Napa, CA | $876,582 (Jun 26) | 6th | -3.1% | 25th | 77% above peers | |
| Mableton, GA | $354,344 (Jun 26) | 24th | -3.2% | 26th | 29% below peers | |
| Wesley Chapel, FL | $402,222 (Jun 26) | 20th | -3.6% | 27th | 19% below peers | |
| Redmond, WA | $1,364,438 (Jun 26) | 3rd | -4.1% | 28th | 175% above peers | |
| Cedar Park, TX | $473,251 (Jun 26) | 17th | -5.2% | 29th | 5% below peers | |
| Pleasanton, CA | $1,556,554 (Jun 26) | 1st | -6.4% | 30th | 214% above peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers. It is rising faster than most of the selected peers.
Starter homes rose about 4% over the 12 months ending June 2026, faster than 86% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan ref | $145,661 (Jun 26) | +4.5% | ||||
| United States ref | $202,486 (Jun 26) | +2.0% | ||||
| Evanston, IL | $297,616 (Jun 26) | 20th | +7.5% | 1st | 17% below peers | |
| Racine, WI | $167,972 (Jun 26) | 28th | +6.2% | 2nd | 53% below peers | |
| Schaumburg, IL | $266,037 (Jun 26) | 23rd | +4.6% | 3rd | 26% below peers | |
| Bethlehem, PA | $272,229 (Jun 26) | 22nd | +4.4% | 4th | 24% below peers | |
| Wyoming, MI | $245,695 (Jun 26) | 25th | +4.0% | 5th | 31% below peers | |
| Rochester Hills, MI | $313,574 (Jun 26) | 17th | +3.5% | 6th | 12% below peers | |
| Hammond, IN | $140,826 (Jun 26) | 30th | +2.2% | 7th | 61% below peers | |
| Scranton, PA | $154,135 (Jun 26) | 29th | +2.1% | 8th | 57% below peers | |
| Rapid City, SD | $273,037 (Jun 26) | 21st | +1.6% | 9th | 24% below peers | |
| Chino Hills, CA | $757,765 (Jun 26) | 5th | +1.2% | 10th | 112% above peers | |
| Woodbury, MN | $310,416 (Jun 26) | 19th | +0.6% | 11th | 13% below peers | |
| Bellflower, CA | $671,637 (Jun 26) | 6th | +0.4% | 12th | 88% above peers | |
| Missoula, MT | $438,448 (Jun 26) | 12th | +0.1% | 13th | 23% above peers | |
| Flagstaff, AZ | $475,488 (Jun 26) | 9th | -0.3% | 14th | 33% above peers | |
| Southfield, MI | $173,669 (Jun 26) | 27th | -0.4% | 15th | 51% below peers | |
| Mansfield, TX | $335,148 (Jun 26) | 16th | -0.7% | 16th | 6% below peers | |
| Carmichael, CA | $428,459 (Jun 26) | 13th | -0.9% | 17th | 20% above peers | |
| Alameda, CA | $828,890 (Jun 26) | 3rd | -1.3% | 18th | 132% above peers | |
| Broomfield, CO | $494,263 (Jun 26) | 8th | -1.4% | 19th | 38% above peers | |
| Loveland, CO | $409,747 (Jun 26) | 14th | -1.4% | 20th | 15% above peers | |
| Flower Mound, TX | $448,297 (Jun 26) | 11th | -2.3% | 21st | 25% above peers | |
| Missouri City, TX | $241,272 (Jun 26) | 26th | -2.4% | 22nd | 32% below peers | |
| Mableton, GA | $254,986 (Jun 26) | 24th | -2.4% | 23rd | 29% below peers | |
| Milpitas, CA | $1,048,305 (Jun 26) | 1st | -2.9% | 24th | 193% above peers | |
| Pittsburg, CA | $465,904 (Jun 26) | 10th | -3.0% | 25th | 30% above peers | |
| Napa, CA | $656,536 (Jun 26) | 7th | -3.2% | 26th | 84% above peers | |
| Wesley Chapel, FL | $312,159 (Jun 26) | 18th | -3.2% | 27th | 13% below peers | |
| Redmond, WA | $785,668 (Jun 26) | 4th | -4.0% | 28th | 120% above peers | |
| Cedar Park, TX | $357,418 (Jun 26) | 15th | -5.9% | 29th | on par with peers | |
| Pleasanton, CA | $1,043,528 (Jun 26) | 2nd | -6.4% | 30th | 192% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Homeownership changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (65.6% then, 67.1% now; margin ±2.8pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan ref | 73.2% | +2.0pp | |||||
| United States ref | 65.2% | ||||||
| Racine, WI | 60.2% | 19th | +9.2pp | 1st | 4% below peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 62.3% | 17th | +8.0pp | 2nd | on par with peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 53.4% | 23rd | +5.6pp | 3rd | 14% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 50.7% | 25th | +2.7pp | 4th | 19% below peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 77.1% | 4th | +3.1pp | 5th | 24% above peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 71.1% | 7th | +2.6pp | 6th | 14% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 62.4% | 16th | +1.8pp | 7th | on par with peers | ||
| Scranton, PA | 49.9% | 27th | +1.3pp | 8th | 20% below peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 67.1% | 9th | +1.5pp | 9th | 8% above peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 63.0% | 13th | +1.1pp | 10th | 1% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 56.2% | 22nd | +0.4pp | 11th | 10% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 58.7% | 20th | +0.4pp | 12th | 6% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 81.8% | 2nd | +0.3pp | 13th | 31% above peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 39.3% | 31st | +0.0pp | 14th | 37% below peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 76.7% | 5th | -0.4pp | 15th | 23% above peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 47.0% | 28th | -0.4pp | 16th | 25% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 63.0% | 14th | -0.8pp | 17th | 1% above peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 50.0% | 26th | -0.8pp | 18th | 20% below peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 62.1% | 18th | -1.5pp | 19th | on par with peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 66.7% | 11th | -1.8pp | 20th | 7% above peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 52.2% | 24th | -1.9pp | 21st | 16% below peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 62.7% | 15th | -2.5pp | 22nd | on par with peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 82.5% | 1st | -3.3pp | 23rd | 32% above peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 77.6% | 3rd | -3.2pp | 24th | 24% above peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 67.0% | 10th | -2.9pp | 25th | 7% above peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 71.5% | 6th | -4.1pp | 26th | 15% above peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 64.6% | 12th | -4.0pp | 27th | 3% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 69.2% | 8th | -5.8pp | 28th | 11% above peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 58.4% | 21st | -6.0pp | 29th | 6% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 42.3% | 30th | -5.1pp | 30th | 32% below peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 43.2% | 29th | -6.8pp | 31st | 31% below peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers.
Rent rose about 3% over the 12 months ending June 2026, faster than 59% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States ref | $1,965 (Jun 26) | +2.2% | ||||
| Milpitas, CA | $3,676 (Jun 26) | 1st | +6.0% | 1st | 75% above peers | |
| Alameda, CA | $2,948 (Jun 26) | 4th | +5.5% | 2nd | 40% above peers | |
| Evanston, IL | $2,562 (Jun 26) | 7th | +5.3% | 3rd | 22% above peers | |
| Hammond, IN | $1,479 (Jun 26) | 27th | +4.5% | 4th | 30% below peers | |
| Pleasanton, CA | $3,180 (Jun 26) | 2nd | +4.0% | 5th | 51% above peers | |
| Bellflower, CA | $2,472 (Jun 26) | 8th | +3.7% | 6th | 18% above peers | |
| Woodbury, MN | $2,257 (Jun 26) | 12th | +3.7% | 7th | 8% above peers | |
| Missoula, MT | $1,550 (Jun 26) | 25th | +3.3% | 8th | 26% below peers | |
| Rapid City, SD | $1,443 (Jun 26) | 28th | +3.2% | 9th | 31% below peers | |
| Scranton, PA | $1,315 (Jun 26) | 29th | +3.2% | 10th | 37% below peers | |
| Flower Mound, TX | $2,404 (Jun 26) | 9th | +3.2% | 11th | 15% above peers | |
| Bethlehem, PA | $1,916 (Jun 26) | 18th | +3.1% | 12th | 9% below peers | |
| Wyoming, MI | $1,607 (Jun 26) | 24th | +3.0% | 13th | 23% below peers | |
| Racine, WI | $1,180 (Jun 26) | 30th | +2.4% | 14th | 44% below peers | |
| Carmichael, CA | $1,795 (Jun 26) | 21st | +2.2% | 15th | 14% below peers | |
| Loveland, CO | $1,859 (Jun 26) | 19th | +2.0% | 16th | 11% below peers | |
| Pittsburg, CA | $2,396 (Jun 26) | 10th | +1.9% | 17th | 14% above peers | |
| Schaumburg, IL | $2,099 (Jun 26) | 15th | +1.7% | 18th | on par with peers | |
| Redmond, WA | $2,640 (Jun 26) | 6th | +1.7% | 19th | 26% above peers | |
| Flagstaff, AZ | $2,117 (Jun 26) | 14th | +1.7% | 20th | 1% above peers | |
| Chino Hills, CA | $3,010 (Jun 26) | 3rd | +1.4% | 21st | 43% above peers | |
| Southfield, MI | $1,533 (Jun 26) | 26th | +1.2% | 22nd | 27% below peers | |
| Napa, CA | $2,781 (Jun 26) | 5th | +1.2% | 23rd | 32% above peers | |
| Rochester Hills, MI | $1,800 (Jun 26) | 20th | +1.2% | 24th | 14% below peers | |
| Wesley Chapel, FL | $2,262 (Jun 26) | 11th | +0.7% | 25th | 8% above peers | |
| Mansfield, TX | $1,732 (Jun 26) | 23rd | +0.4% | 26th | 18% below peers | |
| Missouri City, TX | $2,121 (Jun 26) | 13th | +0.1% | 27th | 1% above peers | |
| Mableton, GA | $2,040 (Jun 26) | 16th | -0.6% | 28th | 3% below peers | |
| Broomfield, CO | $2,035 (Jun 26) | 17th | -0.9% | 29th | 3% below peers | |
| Cedar Park, TX | $1,735 (Jun 26) | 22nd | -1.9% | 30th | 17% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Cost burden changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (28.3% then, 28.5% now; margin ±3.4pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan ref | 27.4% | -0.1pp | |||||
| United States ref | 32.2% | +0.4pp | |||||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 21.4% | 1st | -2.2pp | 1st | 38% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 35.6% | 17th | -3.6pp | 2nd | 3% above peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 46.9% | 31st | -3.4pp | 3rd | 35% above peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 36.9% | 21st | -1.2pp | 4th | 6% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 43.5% | 30th | -1.4pp | 5th | 26% above peers | ||
| Scranton, PA | 37.2% | 24th | -1.0pp | 6th | 7% above peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 36.8% | 20th | -0.7pp | 7th | 6% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 37.2% | 23rd | -0.3pp | 8th | 7% above peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 30.5% | 11th | -0.1pp | 9th | 12% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 40.0% | 27th | +0.0pp | 10th | 15% above peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 28.5% | 6th | +0.2pp | 11th | 18% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 37.1% | 22nd | +0.8pp | 12th | 7% above peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 28.1% | 4th | +0.6pp | 13th | 19% below peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 36.0% | 18th | +1.4pp | 14th | 4% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 29.2% | 8th | +1.3pp | 15th | 16% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 28.7% | 7th | +1.4pp | 16th | 17% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 39.5% | 26th | +2.1pp | 17th | 14% above peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 32.5% | 15th | +1.9pp | 18th | 6% below peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 32.2% | 13th | +2.2pp | 19th | 7% below peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 32.3% | 14th | +2.3pp | 20th | 7% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 42.7% | 29th | +3.1pp | 21st | 23% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 41.8% | 28th | +3.3pp | 22nd | 20% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 30.1% | 9th | +3.0pp | 23rd | 13% below peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 28.2% | 5th | +3.9pp | 24th | 19% below peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 34.7% | 16th | +5.7pp | 25th | on par with peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 24.4% | 2nd | +4.1pp | 26th | 30% below peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 30.8% | 12th | +5.5pp | 27th | 11% below peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 30.4% | 10th | +5.6pp | 28th | 12% below peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 37.7% | 25th | +7.0pp | 29th | 9% above peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 25.6% | 3rd | +4.9pp | 30th | 26% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 36.8% | 19th | +10.8pp | 31st | 6% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
No vehicle fell 2.6 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 8.5% to 5.9% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.8pp). 3 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan ref | 7.0% | -0.7pp | |||||
| United States ref | 8.3% | -0.3pp | |||||
| Racine, WI | 7.7% | 24th | -5.4pp | 1st | 25% above peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 5.9% | 15th | -2.6pp | 2nd | 3% below peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 8.3% | 26th | -2.1pp | 3rd | 36% above peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 8.4% | 27th | -1.6pp | 4th | 38% above peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 6.7% | 19th | -1.1pp | 5th | 9% above peers | ||
| Scranton, PA | 14.2% | 30th | -2.0pp | 6th | 133% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 4.7% | 11th | -0.5pp | 7th | 24% below peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 2.2% | 2nd | -0.2pp | 8th | 63% below peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 10.7% | 29th | -0.5pp | 9th | 75% above peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 4.0% | 9th | -0.1pp | 10th | 34% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 5.4% | 14th | -0.1pp | 11th | 12% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 5.1% | 12th | -0.0pp | 12th | 16% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 8.1% | 25th | -0.0pp | 13th | 32% above peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 7.0% | 20th | +0.0pp | 14th | 14% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 10.0% | 28th | +0.2pp | 15th | 63% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 2.5% | 4th | +0.0pp | 16th | 59% below peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 7.6% | 23rd | +0.2pp | 17th | 24% above peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 7.1% | 22nd | +0.2pp | 18th | 17% above peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 6.1% | 16th | +0.3pp | 19th | on par with peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 17.3% | 31st | +0.8pp | 20th | 182% above peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 4.4% | 10th | +0.3pp | 21st | 28% below peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 5.4% | 13th | +0.7pp | 22nd | 12% below peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 7.1% | 21st | +1.2pp | 23rd | 16% above peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 2.7% | 6th | +0.4pp | 24th | 56% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 2.6% | 5th | +0.5pp | 25th | 58% below peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 3.8% | 7th | +0.9pp | 26th | 38% below peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 1.6% | 1st | +0.5pp | 27th | 75% below peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 6.3% | 17th | +2.2pp | 28th | 3% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 2.5% | 3rd | +0.9pp | 29th | 60% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 6.4% | 18th | +2.5pp | 30th | 5% above peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 3.8% | 8th | +2.1pp | 31st | 38% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Uninsured fell 1.7 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 7.6% to 5.9% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.1pp). 6 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan ref | 4.8% | -0.6pp | |||||
| United States ref | 8.2% | -0.4pp | |||||
| Carmichael, CA | 4.1% | 8th | -2.3pp | 1st | 33% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 1.9% | 1st | -1.1pp | 2nd | 68% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 2.7% | 3rd | -1.4pp | 3rd | 56% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 3.8% | 7th | -1.5pp | 4th | 37% below peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 5.9% | 15th | -1.7pp | 5th | 3% below peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 4.4% | 12th | -0.9pp | 6th | 27% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 5.2% | 14th | -0.9pp | 7th | 15% below peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 9.5% | 26th | -1.7pp | 8th | 57% above peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 8.8% | 25th | -1.5pp | 9th | 46% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 6.2% | 17th | -0.8pp | 10th | 2% above peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 6.0% | 16th | -0.7pp | 11th | on par with peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 7.1% | 21st | -0.8pp | 12th | 18% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 6.5% | 18th | -0.7pp | 13th | 7% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 4.2% | 9th | -0.5pp | 14th | 31% below peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 10.3% | 27th | -0.9pp | 15th | 70% above peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 6.5% | 19th | -0.6pp | 16th | 7% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 2.9% | 4th | +0.0pp | 17th | 53% below peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 4.4% | 11th | +0.1pp | 18th | 28% below peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 8.3% | 24th | +0.2pp | 19th | 37% above peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 2.2% | 2nd | +0.1pp | 20th | 64% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 5.0% | 13th | +0.4pp | 21st | 18% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 10.4% | 28th | +0.9pp | 22nd | 72% above peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 16.7% | 31st | +1.8pp | 23rd | 176% above peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 8.2% | 23rd | +1.0pp | 24th | 35% above peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 7.0% | 20th | +1.3pp | 25th | 16% above peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 3.7% | 6th | +0.7pp | 26th | 40% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 11.7% | 30th | +2.5pp | 27th | 94% above peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 3.0% | 5th | +0.7pp | 28th | 51% below peers | ||
| Scranton, PA | 7.5% | 22nd | +1.9pp | 29th | 24% above peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 4.3% | 10th | +1.3pp | 30th | 29% below peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 11.2% | 29th | +4.3pp | 31st | 85% above peers |
Modeled estimate with no usable trend; the level is shown and no trend claims are made.
Adult obesity is about a quarter above the peer median.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan ref | 36.0% | |||
| United States ref | 33.4% | |||
| Pleasanton, CA | 16.1% | 1st | 46% below peers | |
| Milpitas, CA | 17.1% | 2nd | 43% below peers | |
| Alameda, CA | 18.2% | 3rd | 39% below peers | |
| Redmond, WA | 19.3% | 4th | 35% below peers | |
| Loveland, CO | 22.2% | 5th | 26% below peers | |
| Broomfield, CO | 25.0% | 6th | 16% below peers | |
| Chino Hills, CA | 25.7% | 7th | 14% below peers | |
| Schaumburg, IL | 26.3% | 8th | 12% below peers | |
| Rochester Hills, MI | 26.4% | 9th | 11% below peers | |
| Flagstaff, AZ | 26.5% | 10th | 11% below peers | |
| Flower Mound, TX | 27.4% | 11th | 8% below peers | |
| Cedar Park, TX | 28.5% | 12th | 4% below peers | |
| Bellflower, CA | 28.7% | 13th | 4% below peers | |
| Missoula, MT | 29.3% | 14th | 2% below peers | |
| Napa, CA | 29.5% | 15th | 1% below peers | |
| Evanston, IL | 29.8% | 16th | on par with peers | |
| Woodbury, MN | 30.2% | 17th | 1% above peers | |
| Pittsburg, CA | 31.7% | 18th | 6% above peers | |
| Cheektowaga, NY | 32.6% | 19th | 9% above peers | |
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 32.8% | 20th | 10% above peers | |
| Mableton, GA | 33.2% | 21st | 11% above peers | |
| Carmichael, CA | 34.4% | 22nd | 15% above peers | |
| Rapid City, SD | 35.4% | 23rd | 19% above peers | |
| Missouri City, TX | 35.4% | 24th | 19% above peers | |
| Scranton, PA | 35.6% | 25th | 19% above peers | |
| Wyoming, MI | 36.4% | 26th | 22% above peers | |
| Bethlehem, PA | 36.4% | 27th | 22% above peers | |
| Mansfield, TX | 36.9% | 28th | 24% above peers | |
| Southfield, MI | 38.8% | 29th | 30% above peers | |
| Hammond, IN | 41.8% | 30th | 40% above peers | |
| Racine, WI | 42.9% | 31st | 44% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Child uninsured fell 3.2 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 5.4% to 2.2% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.9pp). 3 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan ref | 3.0% | -0.2pp | |||||
| United States ref | 5.5% | +0.4pp | |||||
| Southfield, MI | 0.3% | 1st | -2.9pp | 1st | 90% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 1.8% | 8th | -3.2pp | 2nd | 50% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 1.4% | 7th | -2.5pp | 3rd | 60% below peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 2.2% | 9th | -3.2pp | 4th | 38% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 1.1% | 3rd | -1.0pp | 5th | 70% below peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 0.6% | 2nd | -0.3pp | 6th | 84% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 1.4% | 6th | -0.5pp | 7th | 61% below peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 4.3% | 21st | -0.7pp | 8th | 22% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 4.2% | 20th | -0.6pp | 9th | 18% above peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 6.0% | 25th | -0.9pp | 10th | 70% above peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 4.4% | 23rd | -0.6pp | 11th | 25% above peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 3.6% | 17th | -0.4pp | 12th | 1% above peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 3.5% | 16th | -0.1pp | 13th | on par with peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 6.1% | 26th | +0.2pp | 14th | 73% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 4.4% | 22nd | +0.2pp | 15th | 23% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 2.7% | 12th | +0.2pp | 16th | 23% below peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 2.4% | 11th | +0.2pp | 17th | 31% below peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 3.7% | 18th | +0.4pp | 18th | 4% above peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 3.2% | 15th | +0.3pp | 19th | 11% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 2.9% | 13th | +0.3pp | 20th | 19% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 4.5% | 24th | +0.5pp | 21st | 26% above peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 7.7% | 29th | +1.2pp | 22nd | 117% above peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 2.4% | 10th | +0.4pp | 23rd | 33% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 7.5% | 28th | +1.9pp | 24th | 110% above peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 3.1% | 14th | +0.9pp | 25th | 12% below peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 11.3% | 31st | +3.5pp | 26th | 219% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 3.7% | 19th | +1.3pp | 27th | 5% above peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 10.2% | 30th | +4.2pp | 28th | 187% above peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 1.1% | 4th | +0.5pp | 29th | 68% below peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 1.3% | 5th | +0.7pp | 30th | 65% below peers | ||
| Scranton, PA | 6.2% | 27th | +4.6pp | 31st | 74% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
College attainment rose 4.8 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 20.7% to 25.5% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.4pp). 19 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan ref | 32.5% | +3.3pp | |||||
| United States ref | 35.7% | +3.5pp | |||||
| Racine, WI | 21.4% | 30th | +4.8pp | 1st | 50% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 29.6% | 25th | +6.0pp | 2nd | 31% below peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 25.5% | 26th | +4.8pp | 3rd | 40% below peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 36.0% | 24th | +6.8pp | 4th | 15% below peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 17.4% | 31st | +3.1pp | 5th | 59% below peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 21.6% | 29th | +3.1pp | 6th | 49% below peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 47.8% | 15th | +6.2pp | 7th | 12% above peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 58.2% | 9th | +7.5pp | 8th | 37% above peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 37.0% | 22nd | +4.2pp | 9th | 13% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 61.5% | 5th | +6.9pp | 10th | 45% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 23.6% | 27th | +2.5pp | 11th | 44% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 38.2% | 21st | +4.0pp | 12th | 10% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 52.3% | 12th | +5.2pp | 13th | 23% above peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 55.6% | 10th | +5.5pp | 14th | 31% above peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 53.0% | 11th | +5.1pp | 15th | 25% above peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 36.7% | 23rd | +3.2pp | 16th | 14% below peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 60.3% | 8th | +4.6pp | 17th | 42% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 40.7% | 18th | +2.9pp | 18th | 4% below peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 69.8% | 2nd | +5.0pp | 19th | 64% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 61.4% | 6th | +4.0pp | 20th | 44% above peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 39.0% | 19th | +2.2pp | 21st | 8% below peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 65.5% | 4th | +3.5pp | 22nd | 54% above peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 75.3% | 1st | +3.5pp | 23rd | 77% above peers | ||
| Scranton, PA | 23.1% | 28th | +1.0pp | 24th | 46% below peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 61.3% | 7th | +2.3pp | 25th | 44% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 69.5% | 3rd | +2.4pp | 26th | 63% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 48.1% | 14th | +1.4pp | 27th | 13% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 50.4% | 13th | +1.0pp | 28th | 19% above peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 38.7% | 20th | +0.4pp | 29th | 9% below peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 42.5% | 16th | +0.3pp | 30th | on par with peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 41.8% | 17th | -1.9pp | 31st | 2% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Preschool enrollment changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (40.0% then, 37.6% now; margin ±13.9pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan ref | 44.4% | -3.1pp | |||||
| United States ref | 45.5% | ||||||
| Cedar Park, TX | 76.6% | 1st | +20.8pp | 1st | 69% above peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 49.3% | 12th | +7.0pp | 2nd | 9% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 45.4% | 15th | +6.0pp | 3rd | on par with peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 54.7% | 8th | +6.5pp | 4th | 21% above peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 69.8% | 2nd | +4.1pp | 5th | 54% above peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 58.0% | 6th | +3.4pp | 6th | 28% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 39.6% | 21st | -0.4pp | 7th | 12% below peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 64.5% | 3rd | -0.8pp | 8th | 43% above peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 61.1% | 4th | -1.4pp | 9th | 35% above peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 51.3% | 10th | -2.9pp | 10th | 14% above peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 37.6% | 26th | -2.4pp | 11th | 17% below peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 41.5% | 19th | -5.0pp | 12th | 8% below peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 45.9% | 14th | -6.6pp | 13th | 2% above peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 50.9% | 11th | -8.2pp | 14th | 13% above peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 37.9% | 25th | -6.1pp | 15th | 16% below peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 38.2% | 24th | -6.5pp | 16th | 15% below peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 38.2% | 23rd | -6.8pp | 17th | 15% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 39.8% | 20th | -7.2pp | 18th | 12% below peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 59.7% | 5th | -12.4pp | 19th | 32% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 51.5% | 9th | -12.5pp | 20th | 14% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 45.2% | 16th | -11.8pp | 21st | on par with peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 37.2% | 27th | -10.9pp | 22nd | 18% below peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 29.5% | 31st | -8.9pp | 23rd | 35% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 55.2% | 7th | -17.1pp | 24th | 22% above peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 48.0% | 13th | -21.9pp | 25th | 6% above peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 33.3% | 30th | -16.4pp | 26th | 26% below peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 45.2% | 17th | -23.0pp | 27th | on par with peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 33.5% | 29th | -17.2pp | 28th | 26% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 41.9% | 18th | -22.6pp | 29th | 7% below peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 38.9% | 22nd | -23.7pp | 30th | 14% below peers | ||
| Scranton, PA | 35.4% | 28th | -21.9pp | 31st | 22% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed. Margins at this size are wide (low-reliability estimate); read the level, not the pace.
Disconnected youth changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (8.6% then, 8.3% now; margin ±5.8pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan ref | 7.3% | +0.5pp | |||||
| United States ref | 6.9% | +0.3pp | |||||
| Rapid City, SD | 4.2% | 15th | -3.5pp | 1st | 21% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 6.0% | 17th | -4.9pp | 2nd | 12% above peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 2.5% | 3rd | -1.7pp | 3rd | 53% below peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 6.3% | 20th | -3.7pp | 4th | 18% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 3.4% | 10th | -1.1pp | 5th | 37% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 8.2% | 26th | -1.3pp | 6th | 53% above peers | ||
| Scranton, PA | 7.3% | 23rd | -1.0pp | 7th | 38% above peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 3.6% | 13th | -0.4pp | 8th | 32% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 3.6% | 12th | -0.2pp | 9th | 32% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 0.9% | 1st | -0.0pp | 10th | 83% below peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 8.3% | 27th | -0.2pp | 11th | 57% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 2.5% | 4th | +0.1pp | 12th | 52% below peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 3.0% | 7th | +0.2pp | 13th | 43% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 11.5% | 30th | +1.0pp | 14th | 117% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 3.0% | 8th | +0.3pp | 15th | 43% below peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 3.4% | 11th | +0.5pp | 16th | 36% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 3.9% | 14th | +0.6pp | 17th | 27% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 7.5% | 24th | +1.2pp | 18th | 42% above peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 2.8% | 6th | +0.6pp | 19th | 47% below peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 6.2% | 19th | +1.5pp | 20th | 17% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 8.0% | 25th | +2.3pp | 21st | 50% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 9.6% | 28th | +2.9pp | 22nd | 81% above peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 2.1% | 2nd | +0.6pp | 23rd | 61% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 7.3% | 22nd | +2.5pp | 24th | 37% above peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 9.9% | 29th | +3.9pp | 25th | 87% above peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 7.0% | 21st | +3.7pp | 26th | 31% above peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 3.2% | 9th | +1.9pp | 27th | 40% below peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 2.8% | 5th | +2.1pp | 28th | 48% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 5.3% | 16th | +4.4pp | 29th | on par with peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 6.2% | 18th | +5.7pp | 30th | 17% above peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 13.1% | 31st | +12.3pp | 31st | 145% above peers |
A real change beyond the survey margin; neither direction is inherently better for this metric.
Population rose about 2% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 75,702 to 77,353 - more than the combined survey margin (±63). 22 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mableton, GA | 77,678 | 10th | +87% | 1st | 1% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 76,011 | 31st | +31% | 2nd | 1% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 76,948 | 18th | +19% | 3rd | on par with peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 77,353 | 13th | +18% | 4th | on par with peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 76,304 | 26th | +12% | 5th | 1% below peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 78,305 | 4th | +12% | 6th | 2% above peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 77,510 | 12th | +11% | 7th | 1% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 76,257 | 27th | +7% | 8th | 1% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 76,445 | 24th | +6% | 9th | 1% below peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 78,301 | 5th | +5% | 10th | 2% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 76,236 | 28th | +4% | 11th | 1% below peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 77,089 | 16th | +4% | 12th | on par with peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 76,514 | 23rd | +4% | 13th | 1% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 76,868 | 19th | +4% | 14th | on par with peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 77,946 | 8th | +4% | 15th | 1% above peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 77,956 | 7th | +3% | 16th | 1% above peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 76,056 | 29th | +3% | 17th | 1% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 76,558 | 22nd | +3% | 18th | 1% below peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 78,389 | 3rd | +2% | 19th | 2% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 76,340 | 25th | +2% | 20th | 1% below peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 77,353 | 14th | +2% | 21st | on par with peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 78,410 | 2nd | +2% | 22nd | 2% above peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 77,633 | 11th | +1% | 23rd | 1% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 76,768 | 21st | +0% | 24th | on par with peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 76,819 | 20th | -0% | 25th | on par with peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 78,239 | 6th | -1% | 26th | 1% above peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 78,578 | 1st | -1% | 27th | 2% above peers | ||
| Scranton, PA | 76,033 | 30th | -1% | 28th | 1% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 77,238 | 15th | -2% | 29th | on par with peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 77,927 | 9th | -3% | 30th | 1% above peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 76,960 | 17th | -6% | 31st | on par with peers |
A real change beyond the survey margin; neither direction is inherently better for this metric.
Single-parent fell 8.3 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 36.3% to 28.1% - more than the combined survey margin (±5.9pp). 3 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan ref | 30.6% | -0.6pp | |||||
| United States ref | 29.9% | -0.2pp | |||||
| Loveland, CO | 30.4% | 13th | +8.8pp | 1st | 15% above peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 42.5% | 5th | +12.0pp | 2nd | 61% above peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 36.5% | 7th | +9.6pp | 3rd | 39% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 14.2% | 27th | +3.2pp | 4th | 46% below peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 18.0% | 23rd | +3.2pp | 5th | 32% below peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 22.6% | 20th | +3.5pp | 6th | 14% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 22.4% | 21st | +3.2pp | 7th | 15% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 34.8% | 8th | +4.9pp | 8th | 32% above peers | ||
| Scranton, PA | 50.3% | 3rd | +6.9pp | 9th | 91% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 29.1% | 14th | +3.6pp | 10th | 10% above peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 25.0% | 19th | +3.0pp | 11th | 5% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 26.4% | 16th | +2.9pp | 12th | on par with peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 38.2% | 6th | +3.1pp | 13th | 45% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 51.2% | 2nd | +3.5pp | 14th | 94% above peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 11.3% | 30th | +0.7pp | 15th | 57% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 25.6% | 18th | +1.6pp | 16th | 3% below peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 16.5% | 26th | +1.0pp | 17th | 37% below peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 30.5% | 12th | +1.8pp | 18th | 16% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 20.2% | 22nd | +1.0pp | 19th | 24% below peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 18.0% | 24th | +0.7pp | 20th | 32% below peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 17.2% | 25th | +0.5pp | 21st | 35% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 57.1% | 1st | +0.7pp | 22nd | 117% above peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 12.1% | 29th | -0.1pp | 23rd | 54% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 13.7% | 28th | -0.7pp | 24th | 48% below peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 11.3% | 31st | -1.0pp | 25th | 57% below peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 44.0% | 4th | -5.0pp | 26th | 67% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 34.5% | 9th | -6.6pp | 27th | 31% above peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 32.4% | 10th | -7.6pp | 28th | 23% above peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 32.1% | 11th | -9.1pp | 29th | 22% above peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 28.1% | 15th | -8.3pp | 30th | 7% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 26.1% | 17th | -9.4pp | 31st | 1% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Working parents changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (71.6% then, 73.9% now; margin ±11.1pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan ref | 67.0% | -0.1pp | |||||
| United States ref | 68.1% | +1.9pp | |||||
| Schaumburg, IL | 66.0% | 23rd | +10.7pp | 1st | 6% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 77.6% | 6th | +12.6pp | 2nd | 10% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 68.4% | 18th | +11.0pp | 3rd | 3% below peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 69.2% | 17th | +9.3pp | 4th | 2% below peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 68.2% | 19th | +8.6pp | 5th | 3% below peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 65.9% | 24th | +8.1pp | 6th | 6% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 78.3% | 5th | +9.5pp | 7th | 11% above peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 57.6% | 29th | +6.9pp | 8th | 18% below peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 83.3% | 1st | +8.8pp | 9th | 19% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 62.3% | 26th | +6.4pp | 10th | 11% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 80.9% | 3rd | +7.0pp | 11th | 15% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 72.3% | 11th | +6.0pp | 12th | 3% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 66.0% | 22nd | +5.5pp | 13th | 6% below peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 81.4% | 2nd | +6.6pp | 14th | 16% above peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 71.5% | 12th | +5.1pp | 15th | 2% above peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 79.7% | 4th | +4.2pp | 16th | 13% above peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 66.7% | 21st | +3.2pp | 17th | 5% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 75.8% | 8th | +3.2pp | 18th | 8% above peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 73.9% | 10th | +2.2pp | 19th | 5% above peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 67.4% | 20th | +2.0pp | 20th | 4% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 74.2% | 9th | +2.1pp | 21st | 6% above peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 76.0% | 7th | +1.9pp | 22nd | 8% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 70.4% | 15th | -0.7pp | 23rd | on par with peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 71.1% | 13th | -2.1pp | 24th | 1% above peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 56.0% | 31st | -2.5pp | 25th | 20% below peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 57.0% | 30th | -3.1pp | 26th | 19% below peers | ||
| Scranton, PA | 61.8% | 27th | -3.6pp | 27th | 12% below peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 70.4% | 14th | -7.2pp | 28th | on par with peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 59.4% | 28th | -6.3pp | 29th | 16% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 70.3% | 16th | -8.4pp | 30th | on par with peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 65.7% | 25th | -8.2pp | 31st | 6% below peers |