The most recent 12 months moved against the better direction, whatever the longer window shows. The checks below judge the multi-year window. It is also worsening faster than most of the selected peers.
Violent crime rose about 8% over the 12 months ending May 2026, faster than 82% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 456 (Apr 26) | -9.3% | |||
| Redmond, WA | 69 (May 26) | -51.3% | 1st | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 55 (May 26) | -44.9% | 2nd | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 35 (May 26) | -34.9% | 3rd | ||
| Loveland, CO | 184 (Apr 26) | -25.9% | 4th | ||
| Tustin, CA | 205 (Apr 26) | -19.8% | 5th | ||
| Napa, CA | 208 (May 26) | -18.4% | 6th | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 166 (May 26) | -17.3% | 7th | ||
| Missoula, MT | 554 (May 26) | -13.2% | 8th | ||
| Hammond, IN | 583 (Feb 26) | -13.1% | 9th | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 89 (May 26) | -6.7% | 10th | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 111 (May 26) | -5.6% | 11th | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 67 (May 26) | -5.5% | 12th | ||
| Evanston, IL | 130 (Apr 26) | -2.9% | 13th | ||
| Alameda, CA | 335 (May 26) | -0.4% | 14th | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 466 (May 26) | +5.2% | 15th | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 179 (May 26) | +6.0% | 16th | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 784 (Apr 26) | +6.5% | 17th | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 490 (Dec 25) | +7.0% | 18th | ||
| Racine, WI | 418 (May 26) | +7.6% | 19th | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 153 (May 26) | +8.1% | 20th | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 69 (May 26) | +16.7% | 21st | ||
| Southfield, MI | 597 (May 26) | +31.5% | 22nd | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 209 (Apr 26) | +92.0% | 23rd |
The most recent 12 months moved against the better direction, whatever the longer window shows. The checks below judge the multi-year window. It is also worsening faster than most of the selected peers.
Property crime rose about 36% over the 12 months ending May 2026, faster than 100% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 1,987 (Apr 26) | -12.2% | |||
| Redmond, WA | 1,640 (May 26) | -34.7% | 1st | ||
| Tustin, CA | 1,605 (Apr 26) | -31.3% | 2nd | ||
| Loveland, CO | 1,377 (Apr 26) | -28.2% | 3rd | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 1,178 (May 26) | -22.5% | 4th | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 1,628 (May 26) | -22.0% | 5th | ||
| Evanston, IL | 2,083 (Apr 26) | -21.9% | 6th | ||
| Missoula, MT | 2,736 (May 26) | -19.0% | 7th | ||
| Napa, CA | 1,071 (May 26) | -18.4% | 8th | ||
| Hammond, IN | 2,390 (Feb 26) | -18.0% | 9th | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 1,176 (May 26) | -13.0% | 10th | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 2,299 (May 26) | -11.1% | 11th | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 1,789 (May 26) | -10.2% | 12th | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 929 (May 26) | -10.1% | 13th | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 521 (May 26) | -8.6% | 14th | ||
| Southfield, MI | 2,241 (May 26) | -7.9% | 15th | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 1,225 (Apr 26) | -7.6% | 16th | ||
| Alameda, CA | 3,611 (May 26) | -6.7% | 17th | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 550 (May 26) | -5.9% | 18th | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 2,092 (Dec 25) | -5.3% | 19th | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 1,908 (May 26) | -1.1% | 20th | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 4,152 (Apr 26) | +3.3% | 21st | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 1,205 (May 26) | +6.6% | 22nd | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 1,221 (May 26) | +10.3% | 23rd | ||
| Racine, WI | 1,686 (May 26) | +35.5% | 24th |
The last 12 months moved in the better direction. The multi-year trend has not (yet) passed the checks below, so no sustained-improvement claim is made.
Homicides fell about 25% over the 12 months ending May 2026, faster than 50% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 6 (Apr 26) | -17.8% | |||
| Wyoming, MI | 0 (May 26) | -100.0% | 1st | ||
| Alameda, CA | 0 (May 26) | -100.0% | 2nd | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 0 (May 26) | -100.0% | 3rd | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 0 (May 26) | -100.0% | 4th | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 0 (May 26) | -100.0% | 5th | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 3 (Dec 25) | -60.0% | 6th | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 1 (May 26) | -50.0% | 7th | ||
| Missoula, MT | 1 (May 26) | -50.0% | 8th | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 3 (May 26) | -33.2% | 9th | ||
| Racine, WI | 4 (May 26) | -25.0% | 10th | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 8 (Apr 26) | +0.0% | 11th | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 1 (May 26) | +0.0% | 12th | ||
| Napa, CA | 3 (May 26) | +0.0% | 13th | ||
| Loveland, CO | 1 (Apr 26) | +0.0% | 14th | ||
| Tustin, CA | 3 (Apr 26) | +0.0% | 15th | ||
| Hammond, IN | 14 (Feb 26) | +10.0% | 16th | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 4 (May 26) | +200.0% | 17th | ||
| Southfield, MI | 8 (May 26) | +200.0% | 18th | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 6 (May 26) | +399.2% | 19th | ||
| Redmond, WA | 0 (May 26) | ||||
| Flower Mound, TX | 0 (May 26) | ||||
| Schaumburg, IL | 5 (May 26) | ||||
| Milpitas, CA | 0 (May 26) | ||||
| Evanston, IL | 0 (Apr 26) |
The most recent 12 months moved against the better direction, whatever the longer window shows. The checks below judge the multi-year window. It is also worsening faster than most of the selected peers.
Vehicle theft rose about 16% over the 12 months ending May 2026, faster than 91% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 303 (Apr 26) | -22.2% | |||
| Redmond, WA | 88 (May 26) | -68.4% | 1st | ||
| Loveland, CO | 59 (Apr 26) | -64.7% | 2nd | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 54 (May 26) | -49.4% | 3rd | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 30 (May 26) | -44.2% | 4th | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 182 (May 26) | -41.1% | 5th | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 160 (May 26) | -39.0% | 6th | ||
| Missoula, MT | 116 (May 26) | -38.1% | 7th | ||
| Napa, CA | 84 (May 26) | -33.7% | 8th | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 22 (May 26) | -28.0% | 9th | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 135 (May 26) | -26.9% | 10th | ||
| Southfield, MI | 414 (May 26) | -23.6% | 11th | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 123 (Apr 26) | -22.7% | 12th | ||
| Tustin, CA | 146 (Apr 26) | -19.0% | 13th | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 112 (Dec 25) | -17.9% | 14th | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 317 (Apr 26) | -17.6% | 15th | ||
| Evanston, IL | 157 (Apr 26) | -17.4% | 16th | ||
| Alameda, CA | 664 (May 26) | -17.0% | 17th | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 152 (May 26) | -12.2% | 18th | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 96 (May 26) | -11.6% | 19th | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 85 (May 26) | -10.7% | 20th | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 64 (May 26) | -5.7% | 21st | ||
| Racine, WI | 247 (May 26) | +15.6% | 22nd | ||
| Hammond, IN | 416 (Feb 26) | +20.6% | 23rd | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 51 (May 26) | +42.9% | 24th |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Household income rose about 31% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from $44,056 to $57,740 (each survey's own dollars, not adjusted for inflation) - more than the combined survey margin (±$2,988). 29 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin ref | $77,485 | +25% | |||||
| United States ref | $80,734 | +28% | |||||
| Missoula, MT | $70,392 | 26th | +48% | 1st | 27% below peers | ||
| Daytona Beach, FL | $52,058 | 31st | +45% | 2nd | 46% below peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | $73,677 | 23rd | +36% | 3rd | 24% below peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | $70,870 | 25th | +35% | 4th | 27% below peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | $178,798 | 2nd | +35% | 5th | 85% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | $99,861 | 14th | +34% | 6th | 4% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | $112,503 | 12th | +33% | 7th | 17% above peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | $85,914 | 18th | +33% | 8th | 11% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | $137,697 | 5th | +31% | 9th | 43% above peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | $78,722 | 20th | +31% | 10th | 18% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | $57,740 | 29th | +31% | 11th | 40% below peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | $123,874 | 9th | +28% | 12th | 28% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | $120,694 | 11th | +28% | 13th | 25% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | $105,963 | 13th | +26% | 14th | 10% above peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | $129,545 | 6th | +25% | 15th | 34% above peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | $68,879 | 27th | +23% | 16th | 29% below peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | $84,604 | 19th | +23% | 17th | 12% below peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | $162,560 | 3rd | +23% | 18th | 69% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | $68,166 | 28th | +22% | 19th | 29% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | $96,434 | 16th | +22% | 20th | on par with peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | $71,512 | 24th | +22% | 21st | 26% below peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | $121,126 | 10th | +22% | 22nd | 26% above peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | $190,124 | 1st | +22% | 23rd | 97% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | $55,504 | 30th | +20% | 24th | 42% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | $126,334 | 7th | +19% | 25th | 31% above peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | $161,235 | 4th | +17% | 26th | 67% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | $97,514 | 15th | +17% | 27th | 1% above peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | $125,310 | 8th | +15% | 28th | 30% above peers | ||
| Bloomington, IL | $77,384 | 22nd | +15% | 29th | 20% below peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | $77,980 | 21st | +12% | 30th | 19% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | $94,390 | 17th | +7% | 31st | 2% below peers |
The last 12 months moved in the better direction. The multi-year trend has not (yet) passed the checks below, so no sustained-improvement claim is made. It is also improving faster than most of the selected peers.
Unemployment fell 0.1 percentage points over the 12 months ending May 2026, faster than 69% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin ref | 3.4% (May 26) | +0.3pp | ||||
| United States ref | 4.2% (Jun 26) | +0.1pp | ||||
| Hammond, IN | 4.1% (May 26) | 18th | -1.2pp | 1st | 5% above peers | |
| Milpitas, CA | 3.5% (May 26) | 6th | -0.7pp | 2nd | 10% below peers | |
| Loveland, CO | 3.5% (May 26) | 7th | -0.6pp | 3rd | 10% below peers | |
| Mableton, GA | 3.2% (May 26) | 3rd | -0.4pp | 4th | 18% below peers | |
| Alameda, CA | 4.0% (May 26) | 17th | -0.3pp | 5th | 3% above peers | |
| Pleasanton, CA | 3.7% (May 26) | 12th | -0.3pp | 6th | 5% below peers | |
| Napa, CA | 3.6% (May 26) | 10th | -0.2pp | 7th | 8% below peers | |
| Wyoming, MI | 4.3% (May 26) | 20th | -0.1pp | 8th | 10% above peers | |
| Bellflower, CA | 5.1% (May 26) | 28th | -0.1pp | 9th | 31% above peers | |
| Racine, WI | 3.9% (May 26) | 15th | -0.1pp | 10th | on par with peers | |
| Chino Hills, CA | 3.4% (May 26) | 5th | -0.1pp | 11th | 13% below peers | |
| Missoula, MT | 2.6% (May 26) | 2nd | -0.1pp | 12th | 33% below peers | |
| Broomfield, CO | 3.6% (May 26) | 11th | -0.1pp | 13th | 8% below peers | |
| Tustin, CA | 3.3% (May 26) | 4th | -0.1pp | 14th | 15% below peers | |
| Pittsburg, CA | 4.5% (May 26) | 22nd | -0.1pp | 15th | 15% above peers | |
| Rapid City, SD | 1.9% (May 26) | 1st | +0.0pp | 16th | 51% below peers | |
| Cedar Park, TX | 3.5% (May 26) | 8th | +0.1pp | 17th | 10% below peers | |
| Mansfield, TX | 4.1% (May 26) | 19th | +0.3pp | 18th | 5% above peers | |
| Missouri City, TX | 4.9% (May 26) | 27th | +0.3pp | 19th | 26% above peers | |
| Woodbury, MN | 3.5% (May 26) | 9th | +0.4pp | 20th | 10% below peers | |
| Flower Mound, TX | 3.7% (May 26) | 13th | +0.5pp | 21st | 5% below peers | |
| Bloomington, IL | 3.9% (May 26) | 16th | +0.5pp | 22nd | on par with peers | |
| Rochester Hills, MI | 3.8% (May 26) | 14th | +0.6pp | 23rd | 3% below peers | |
| Evanston, IL | 4.6% (May 26) | 23rd | +0.6pp | 24th | 18% above peers | |
| Redmond, WA | 4.3% (May 26) | 21st | +0.7pp | 25th | 10% above peers | |
| Schaumburg, IL | 4.7% (May 26) | 24th | +0.7pp | 26th | 21% above peers | |
| Flagstaff, AZ | 4.7% (May 26) | 25th | +0.7pp | 27th | 21% above peers | |
| Bethlehem, PA | 4.8% (May 26) | 26th | +0.9pp | 28th | 23% above peers | |
| Southfield, MI | 6.8% (May 26) | 30th | +1.2pp | 29th | 74% above peers | |
| Daytona Beach, FL | 6.5% (May 26) | 29th | +1.5pp | 30th | 67% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Poverty changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (20.5% then, 17.9% now; margin ±2.9pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin ref | 10.2% | -0.7pp | |||||
| United States ref | 12.0% | ||||||
| Missoula, MT | 11.4% | 22nd | -5.5pp | 1st | 15% above peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 12.0% | 23rd | -3.7pp | 2nd | 21% above peers | ||
| Daytona Beach, FL | 18.7% | 30th | -4.5pp | 3rd | 89% above peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 10.4% | 18th | -1.6pp | 4th | 5% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 18.9% | 31st | -2.9pp | 5th | 92% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 11.1% | 21st | -1.7pp | 6th | 12% above peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 5.7% | 7th | -0.8pp | 7th | 42% below peers | ||
| Bloomington, IL | 10.7% | 20th | -1.6pp | 8th | 8% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 9.9% | 16th | -1.4pp | 9th | on par with peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 17.9% | 29th | -2.6pp | 10th | 81% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 10.6% | 19th | -1.5pp | 11th | 8% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 5.6% | 6th | -0.7pp | 12th | 43% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 10.1% | 17th | -1.0pp | 13th | 2% above peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 12.4% | 24th | -0.7pp | 14th | 26% above peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 7.1% | 12th | -0.1pp | 15th | 28% below peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 14.4% | 27th | +0.1pp | 16th | 46% above peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 8.4% | 15th | +0.2pp | 17th | 15% below peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 13.1% | 25th | +0.4pp | 18th | 33% above peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 5.6% | 5th | +0.2pp | 19th | 43% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 8.4% | 14th | +0.5pp | 20th | 15% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 15.4% | 28th | +1.0pp | 21st | 56% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 5.0% | 2nd | +0.3pp | 22nd | 49% below peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 6.1% | 10th | +0.6pp | 23rd | 38% below peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 13.4% | 26th | +2.4pp | 24th | 35% above peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 5.3% | 4th | +1.0pp | 25th | 46% below peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 5.9% | 9th | +1.1pp | 26th | 41% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 7.6% | 13th | +1.6pp | 27th | 23% below peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 4.3% | 1st | +1.3pp | 28th | 57% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 7.0% | 11th | +2.4pp | 29th | 29% below peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 5.8% | 8th | +2.0pp | 30th | 41% below peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 5.2% | 3rd | +2.1pp | 31st | 47% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Child poverty fell 6.5 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 30.3% to 23.8% - more than the combined survey margin (±4.1pp). 8 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin ref | 12.8% | -2.1pp | |||||
| United States ref | 16.1% | ||||||
| Southfield, MI | 5.9% | 8th | -8.2pp | 1st | 37% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 3.8% | 2nd | -4.6pp | 2nd | 60% below peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 8.3% | 13th | -7.6pp | 3rd | 12% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 4.4% | 3rd | -3.4pp | 4th | 53% below peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 5.0% | 4th | -3.7pp | 5th | 47% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 5.3% | 5th | -2.1pp | 6th | 44% below peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 18.1% | 26th | -6.8pp | 7th | 94% above peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 13.2% | 20th | -4.6pp | 8th | 41% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 26.2% | 30th | -8.6pp | 9th | 180% above peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 23.8% | 28th | -6.5pp | 10th | 154% above peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 3.0% | 1st | -0.7pp | 11th | 68% below peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 9.3% | 15th | -1.8pp | 12th | 1% below peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 13.5% | 21st | -2.4pp | 13th | 44% above peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 17.1% | 25th | -2.9pp | 14th | 82% above peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 15.8% | 22nd | -2.4pp | 15th | 68% above peers | ||
| Daytona Beach, FL | 38.8% | 31st | -5.2pp | 16th | 314% above peers | ||
| Bloomington, IL | 10.9% | 18th | -0.5pp | 17th | 16% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 16.5% | 23rd | -0.3pp | 18th | 76% above peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 23.3% | 27th | +0.1pp | 19th | 148% above peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 6.5% | 11th | +0.3pp | 20th | 31% below peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 6.1% | 9th | +0.7pp | 21st | 34% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 10.0% | 17th | +1.3pp | 22nd | 6% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 11.4% | 19th | +1.6pp | 23rd | 22% above peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 5.5% | 6th | +0.8pp | 24th | 41% below peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 24.4% | 29th | +5.4pp | 25th | 160% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 5.8% | 7th | +1.3pp | 26th | 38% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 9.4% | 16th | +4.0pp | 27th | on par with peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 16.6% | 24th | +7.3pp | 28th | 78% above peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 6.7% | 12th | +3.3pp | 29th | 28% below peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 8.3% | 14th | +4.2pp | 30th | 11% below peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 6.2% | 10th | +3.3pp | 31st | 34% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Broadband rose 9.9 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 79.3% to 89.2% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.8pp). 26 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin ref | 90.6% | +7.4pp | |||||
| United States ref | 91.1% | ||||||
| Daytona Beach, FL | 90.2% | 27th | +19.9pp | 1st | 4% below peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 87.3% | 31st | +13.3pp | 2nd | 7% below peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 91.3% | 24th | +10.6pp | 3rd | 3% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 89.2% | 28th | +9.9pp | 4th | 5% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 91.9% | 23rd | +8.3pp | 5th | 2% below peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 90.5% | 26th | +7.6pp | 6th | 4% below peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 88.6% | 30th | +7.3pp | 7th | 6% below peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 95.6% | 12th | +7.8pp | 8th | 1% above peers | ||
| Bloomington, IL | 90.9% | 25th | +7.1pp | 9th | 4% below peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 93.3% | 19th | +6.0pp | 10th | 1% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 94.2% | 16th | +5.0pp | 11th | on par with peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 93.9% | 17th | +4.7pp | 12th | on par with peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 93.4% | 18th | +4.6pp | 13th | 1% below peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 92.0% | 22nd | +4.5pp | 14th | 2% below peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 96.5% | 7th | +4.7pp | 15th | 2% above peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 95.0% | 15th | +4.4pp | 16th | 1% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 95.6% | 11th | +4.1pp | 17th | 1% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 95.4% | 14th | +3.7pp | 18th | 1% above peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 96.8% | 6th | +3.6pp | 19th | 3% above peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 88.7% | 29th | +3.0pp | 20th | 6% below peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 92.3% | 20th | +3.0pp | 21st | 2% below peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 98.1% | 1st | +3.1pp | 22nd | 4% above peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 97.9% | 2nd | +2.8pp | 23rd | 4% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 97.6% | 3rd | +2.7pp | 24th | 4% above peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 97.0% | 5th | +2.4pp | 25th | 3% above peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 96.3% | 8th | +2.0pp | 26th | 2% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 96.3% | 9th | +1.7pp | 27th | 2% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 92.1% | 21st | +1.4pp | 28th | 2% below peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 95.8% | 10th | +0.7pp | 29th | 2% above peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 95.5% | 13th | +0.6pp | 30th | 1% above peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 97.4% | 4th | +0.4pp | 31st | 3% above peers |
Beyond the survey margin, but small next to the spread across these peers.
Inequality fell about 7% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 0.44 to 0.41 - more than the combined survey margin (±0.02). 3 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin ref | 0.44 | -0.001 | |||||
| United States ref | 0.48 | +0.001 | |||||
| Broomfield, CO | 0.40 | 2nd | -0.034 | 1st | 8% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 0.41 | 6th | -0.030 | 2nd | 6% below peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 0.42 | 8th | -0.024 | 3rd | 4% below peers | ||
| Bloomington, IL | 0.47 | 25th | -0.025 | 4th | 8% above peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 0.47 | 24th | -0.021 | 5th | 7% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 0.42 | 9th | -0.019 | 6th | 4% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 0.46 | 22nd | -0.018 | 7th | 6% above peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 0.42 | 13th | -0.014 | 8th | 3% below peers | ||
| Daytona Beach, FL | 0.49 | 30th | -0.013 | 9th | 13% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 0.54 | 31st | -0.013 | 10th | 24% above peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 0.43 | 15th | -0.003 | 11th | 2% below peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 0.47 | 27th | +0.000 | 12th | 9% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 0.44 | 18th | +0.002 | 13th | 2% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 0.44 | 19th | +0.009 | 14th | 2% above peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 0.44 | 17th | +0.012 | 15th | 2% above peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 0.41 | 5th | +0.012 | 16th | 6% below peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 0.46 | 23rd | +0.016 | 17th | 6% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 0.41 | 4th | +0.016 | 18th | 6% below peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 0.42 | 11th | +0.018 | 19th | 4% below peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 0.42 | 10th | +0.018 | 20th | 4% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 0.49 | 29th | +0.023 | 21st | 12% above peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 0.43 | 16th | +0.024 | 22nd | on par with peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 0.48 | 28th | +0.027 | 23rd | 10% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 0.46 | 21st | +0.027 | 24th | 5% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 0.41 | 7th | +0.025 | 25th | 6% below peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 0.40 | 1st | +0.025 | 26th | 8% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 0.47 | 26th | +0.029 | 27th | 9% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 0.42 | 12th | +0.032 | 28th | 3% below peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 0.41 | 3rd | +0.033 | 29th | 6% below peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 0.45 | 20th | +0.041 | 30th | 3% above peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 0.42 | 14th | +0.048 | 31st | 3% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
SNAP fell 6.9 percentage points between the 2014-2018 and 2019-2023 surveys, from 28.1% to 21.2% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.2pp). That reverses the previous span, which went up between the 2009-2013 and 2014-2018 surveys. 3 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
| Place | Latest2019-2023 survey | Today's rank | Change2014-2018 → 2019-2023 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin ref | 10.8% | -0.8pp | |||||
| United States ref | 11.8% | -0.5pp | |||||
| Missoula, MT | 8.1% | 18th | -4.9pp | 1st | 5% above peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 21.2% | 31st | -6.9pp | 2nd | 175% above peers | ||
| Daytona Beach, FL | 18.7% | 29th | -6.1pp | 3rd | 143% above peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 12.2% | 23rd | -3.3pp | 4th | 59% above peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 10.6% | 21st | -2.2pp | 5th | 38% above peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 10.6% | 20th | -1.3pp | 6th | 38% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 18.6% | 28th | -1.7pp | 7th | 142% above peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 4.1% | 8th | -0.4pp | 8th | 46% below peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 3.4% | 6th | -0.3pp | 9th | 56% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 7.2% | 13th | -0.6pp | 10th | 6% below peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 3.8% | 7th | -0.1pp | 11th | 51% below peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 1.7% | 1st | -0.0pp | 12th | 78% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 9.3% | 19th | -0.1pp | 13th | 21% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 14.8% | 26th | +0.0pp | 14th | 92% above peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 3.2% | 4th | +0.1pp | 15th | 59% below peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 7.5% | 14th | +0.2pp | 16th | 3% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 5.9% | 12th | +0.2pp | 17th | 23% below peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 7.8% | 17th | +0.3pp | 18th | 1% above peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 18.7% | 30th | +0.8pp | 19th | 143% above peers | ||
| Bloomington, IL | 12.7% | 24th | +1.0pp | 20th | 65% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 13.7% | 25th | +1.4pp | 21st | 78% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 5.8% | 11th | +0.7pp | 22nd | 25% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 12.2% | 22nd | +2.3pp | 23rd | 59% above peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 17.9% | 27th | +4.6pp | 24th | 133% above peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 2.6% | 2nd | +0.7pp | 25th | 66% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 7.5% | 15th | +2.0pp | 26th | 2% below peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 3.4% | 5th | +1.0pp | 27th | 56% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 7.7% | 16th | +2.9pp | 28th | on par with peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 5.7% | 10th | +2.2pp | 29th | 27% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 4.7% | 9th | +2.8pp | 30th | 40% below peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 3.1% | 3rd | +1.9pp | 31st | 60% below peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers. It is rising faster than most of the selected peers.
Home value rose about 5% over the 12 months ending June 2026, faster than 93% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin ref | $342,279 (Jun 26) | +4.9% | ||||
| United States ref | $372,995 (Jun 26) | +0.8% | ||||
| Evanston, IL | $496,114 (Jun 26) | 16th | +7.7% | 1st | on par with peers | |
| Schaumburg, IL | $363,376 (Jun 26) | 23rd | +4.9% | 2nd | 27% below peers | |
| Racine, WI | $221,388 (Jun 26) | 30th | +4.9% | 3rd | 55% below peers | |
| Bethlehem, PA | $366,727 (Jun 26) | 22nd | +3.7% | 4th | 26% below peers | |
| Rochester Hills, MI | $480,334 (Jun 26) | 17th | +3.6% | 5th | 3% below peers | |
| Wyoming, MI | $296,437 (Jun 26) | 26th | +3.2% | 6th | 40% below peers | |
| Bloomington, IL | $271,396 (Jun 26) | 27th | +2.3% | 7th | 45% below peers | |
| Rapid City, SD | $367,620 (Jun 26) | 21st | +1.9% | 8th | 26% below peers | |
| Southfield, MI | $258,802 (Jun 26) | 28th | +1.8% | 9th | 48% below peers | |
| Chino Hills, CA | $993,719 (Jun 26) | 6th | +1.5% | 10th | 100% above peers | |
| Woodbury, MN | $466,549 (Jun 26) | 19th | +1.4% | 11th | 6% below peers | |
| Bellflower, CA | $806,220 (Jun 26) | 8th | +0.9% | 12th | 63% above peers | |
| Missoula, MT | $576,303 (Jun 26) | 12th | +0.9% | 13th | 16% above peers | |
| Hammond, IN | $178,516 (Jun 26) | 31st | +0.7% | 14th | 64% below peers | |
| Tustin, CA | $1,181,600 (Jun 26) | 4th | -0.5% | 15th | 138% above peers | |
| Flagstaff, AZ | $665,540 (Jun 26) | 9th | -0.5% | 16th | 34% above peers | |
| Carmichael, CA | $565,058 (Jun 26) | 14th | -0.6% | 17th | 14% above peers | |
| Mansfield, TX | $449,169 (Jun 26) | 20th | -1.0% | 18th | 9% below peers | |
| Broomfield, CO | $631,967 (Jun 26) | 10th | -1.3% | 19th | 27% above peers | |
| Loveland, CO | $504,321 (Jun 26) | 15th | -1.4% | 20th | 2% above peers | |
| Alameda, CA | $1,160,754 (Jun 26) | 5th | -1.5% | 21st | 134% above peers | |
| Flower Mound, TX | $616,639 (Jun 26) | 11th | -1.6% | 22nd | 24% above peers | |
| Missouri City, TX | $338,546 (Jun 26) | 25th | -1.9% | 23rd | 32% below peers | |
| Milpitas, CA | $1,445,017 (Jun 26) | 2nd | -2.0% | 24th | 191% above peers | |
| Pittsburg, CA | $568,060 (Jun 26) | 13th | -2.6% | 25th | 15% above peers | |
| Napa, CA | $876,582 (Jun 26) | 7th | -3.1% | 26th | 77% above peers | |
| Mableton, GA | $354,344 (Jun 26) | 24th | -3.2% | 27th | 29% below peers | |
| Daytona Beach, FL | $253,188 (Jun 26) | 29th | -3.8% | 28th | 49% below peers | |
| Redmond, WA | $1,364,438 (Jun 26) | 3rd | -4.1% | 29th | 175% above peers | |
| Cedar Park, TX | $473,251 (Jun 26) | 18th | -5.2% | 30th | 5% below peers | |
| Pleasanton, CA | $1,556,554 (Jun 26) | 1st | -6.4% | 31st | 214% above peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers. It is rising faster than most of the selected peers.
Starter homes rose about 6% over the 12 months ending June 2026, faster than 97% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin ref | $216,780 (Jun 26) | +6.5% | ||||
| United States ref | $202,486 (Jun 26) | +2.0% | ||||
| Evanston, IL | $297,616 (Jun 26) | 20th | +7.5% | 1st | 17% below peers | |
| Racine, WI | $167,972 (Jun 26) | 28th | +6.2% | 2nd | 53% below peers | |
| Schaumburg, IL | $266,037 (Jun 26) | 23rd | +4.6% | 3rd | 26% below peers | |
| Bethlehem, PA | $272,229 (Jun 26) | 22nd | +4.4% | 4th | 24% below peers | |
| Wyoming, MI | $245,695 (Jun 26) | 25th | +4.0% | 5th | 31% below peers | |
| Bloomington, IL | $166,714 (Jun 26) | 29th | +3.7% | 6th | 53% below peers | |
| Rochester Hills, MI | $313,574 (Jun 26) | 18th | +3.5% | 7th | 12% below peers | |
| Hammond, IN | $140,826 (Jun 26) | 30th | +2.2% | 8th | 61% below peers | |
| Rapid City, SD | $273,037 (Jun 26) | 21st | +1.6% | 9th | 24% below peers | |
| Chino Hills, CA | $757,765 (Jun 26) | 5th | +1.2% | 10th | 112% above peers | |
| Woodbury, MN | $310,416 (Jun 26) | 19th | +0.6% | 11th | 13% below peers | |
| Bellflower, CA | $671,637 (Jun 26) | 7th | +0.4% | 12th | 88% above peers | |
| Missoula, MT | $438,448 (Jun 26) | 13th | +0.1% | 13th | 23% above peers | |
| Flagstaff, AZ | $475,488 (Jun 26) | 10th | -0.3% | 14th | 33% above peers | |
| Southfield, MI | $173,669 (Jun 26) | 27th | -0.4% | 15th | 51% below peers | |
| Mansfield, TX | $335,148 (Jun 26) | 17th | -0.7% | 16th | 6% below peers | |
| Carmichael, CA | $428,459 (Jun 26) | 14th | -0.9% | 17th | 20% above peers | |
| Alameda, CA | $828,890 (Jun 26) | 3rd | -1.3% | 18th | 132% above peers | |
| Broomfield, CO | $494,263 (Jun 26) | 9th | -1.4% | 19th | 38% above peers | |
| Tustin, CA | $748,089 (Jun 26) | 6th | -1.4% | 20th | 109% above peers | |
| Loveland, CO | $409,747 (Jun 26) | 15th | -1.4% | 21st | 15% above peers | |
| Flower Mound, TX | $448,297 (Jun 26) | 12th | -2.3% | 22nd | 25% above peers | |
| Missouri City, TX | $241,272 (Jun 26) | 26th | -2.4% | 23rd | 32% below peers | |
| Mableton, GA | $254,986 (Jun 26) | 24th | -2.4% | 24th | 29% below peers | |
| Milpitas, CA | $1,048,305 (Jun 26) | 1st | -2.9% | 25th | 193% above peers | |
| Pittsburg, CA | $465,904 (Jun 26) | 11th | -3.0% | 26th | 30% above peers | |
| Napa, CA | $656,536 (Jun 26) | 8th | -3.2% | 27th | 84% above peers | |
| Redmond, WA | $785,668 (Jun 26) | 4th | -4.0% | 28th | 120% above peers | |
| Daytona Beach, FL | $137,987 (Jun 26) | 31st | -5.2% | 29th | 61% below peers | |
| Cedar Park, TX | $357,418 (Jun 26) | 16th | -5.9% | 30th | on par with peers | |
| Pleasanton, CA | $1,043,528 (Jun 26) | 2nd | -6.4% | 31st | 192% above peers |
Beyond the survey margin, but small next to the spread across these peers.
Homeownership rose 9.2 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 51.0% to 60.2% - more than the combined survey margin (±3.1pp). That reverses the previous span, which went down between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys. 4 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin ref | 67.8% | +0.8pp | |||||
| United States ref | 65.2% | ||||||
| Racine, WI | 60.2% | 18th | +9.2pp | 1st | 3% below peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 62.3% | 15th | +8.0pp | 2nd | on par with peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 53.4% | 22nd | +5.6pp | 3rd | 14% below peers | ||
| Daytona Beach, FL | 47.5% | 27th | +3.5pp | 4th | 24% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 50.7% | 24th | +2.7pp | 5th | 18% below peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 62.4% | 14th | +1.8pp | 6th | on par with peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 67.1% | 7th | +1.5pp | 7th | 8% above peers | ||
| Bloomington, IL | 61.9% | 17th | +1.2pp | 8th | on par with peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 63.0% | 11th | +1.1pp | 9th | 1% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 56.2% | 21st | +0.4pp | 10th | 10% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 58.7% | 19th | +0.4pp | 11th | 6% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 81.8% | 2nd | +0.3pp | 12th | 32% above peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 39.3% | 31st | +0.0pp | 13th | 37% below peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 76.7% | 4th | -0.4pp | 14th | 23% above peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 47.0% | 28th | -0.4pp | 15th | 24% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 63.0% | 12th | -0.8pp | 16th | 1% above peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 50.0% | 25th | -0.8pp | 17th | 20% below peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 48.8% | 26th | -0.9pp | 18th | 21% below peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 62.1% | 16th | -1.5pp | 19th | on par with peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 66.7% | 9th | -1.8pp | 20th | 7% above peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 52.2% | 23rd | -1.9pp | 21st | 16% below peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 62.7% | 13th | -2.5pp | 22nd | 1% above peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 82.5% | 1st | -3.3pp | 23rd | 33% above peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 77.6% | 3rd | -3.2pp | 24th | 25% above peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 67.0% | 8th | -2.9pp | 25th | 8% above peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 71.5% | 5th | -4.1pp | 26th | 15% above peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 64.6% | 10th | -4.0pp | 27th | 4% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 69.2% | 6th | -5.8pp | 28th | 11% above peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 58.4% | 20th | -6.0pp | 29th | 6% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 42.3% | 30th | -5.1pp | 30th | 32% below peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 43.2% | 29th | -6.8pp | 31st | 30% below peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers.
Rent rose about 2% over the 12 months ending June 2026, faster than 57% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States ref | $1,965 (Jun 26) | +2.2% | ||||
| Milpitas, CA | $3,676 (Jun 26) | 1st | +6.0% | 1st | 80% above peers | |
| Alameda, CA | $2,948 (Jun 26) | 5th | +5.5% | 2nd | 45% above peers | |
| Bloomington, IL | $1,368 (Jun 26) | 30th | +5.4% | 3rd | 33% below peers | |
| Evanston, IL | $2,562 (Jun 26) | 8th | +5.3% | 4th | 26% above peers | |
| Hammond, IN | $1,479 (Jun 26) | 28th | +4.5% | 5th | 27% below peers | |
| Pleasanton, CA | $3,180 (Jun 26) | 2nd | +4.0% | 6th | 56% above peers | |
| Bellflower, CA | $2,472 (Jun 26) | 9th | +3.7% | 7th | 21% above peers | |
| Woodbury, MN | $2,257 (Jun 26) | 12th | +3.7% | 8th | 11% above peers | |
| Missoula, MT | $1,550 (Jun 26) | 26th | +3.3% | 9th | 24% below peers | |
| Rapid City, SD | $1,443 (Jun 26) | 29th | +3.2% | 10th | 29% below peers | |
| Flower Mound, TX | $2,404 (Jun 26) | 10th | +3.2% | 11th | 18% above peers | |
| Bethlehem, PA | $1,916 (Jun 26) | 18th | +3.1% | 12th | 6% below peers | |
| Wyoming, MI | $1,607 (Jun 26) | 24th | +3.0% | 13th | 21% below peers | |
| Racine, WI | $1,180 (Jun 26) | 31st | +2.4% | 14th | 42% below peers | |
| Carmichael, CA | $1,795 (Jun 26) | 21st | +2.2% | 15th | 12% below peers | |
| Tustin, CA | $3,151 (Jun 26) | 3rd | +2.0% | 16th | 54% above peers | |
| Loveland, CO | $1,859 (Jun 26) | 19th | +2.0% | 17th | 9% below peers | |
| Pittsburg, CA | $2,396 (Jun 26) | 11th | +1.9% | 18th | 17% above peers | |
| Schaumburg, IL | $2,099 (Jun 26) | 15th | +1.7% | 19th | 3% above peers | |
| Redmond, WA | $2,640 (Jun 26) | 7th | +1.7% | 20th | 29% above peers | |
| Flagstaff, AZ | $2,117 (Jun 26) | 14th | +1.7% | 21st | 4% above peers | |
| Chino Hills, CA | $3,010 (Jun 26) | 4th | +1.4% | 22nd | 48% above peers | |
| Southfield, MI | $1,533 (Jun 26) | 27th | +1.2% | 23rd | 25% below peers | |
| Napa, CA | $2,781 (Jun 26) | 6th | +1.2% | 24th | 36% above peers | |
| Rochester Hills, MI | $1,800 (Jun 26) | 20th | +1.2% | 25th | 12% below peers | |
| Mansfield, TX | $1,732 (Jun 26) | 23rd | +0.4% | 26th | 15% below peers | |
| Missouri City, TX | $2,121 (Jun 26) | 13th | +0.1% | 27th | 4% above peers | |
| Daytona Beach, FL | $1,565 (Jun 26) | 25th | +0.1% | 28th | 23% below peers | |
| Mableton, GA | $2,040 (Jun 26) | 16th | -0.6% | 29th | on par with peers | |
| Broomfield, CO | $2,035 (Jun 26) | 17th | -0.9% | 30th | on par with peers | |
| Cedar Park, TX | $1,735 (Jun 26) | 22nd | -1.9% | 31st | 15% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Cost burden changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (37.5% then, 36.8% now; margin ±3.7pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin ref | 26.4% | -0.8pp | |||||
| United States ref | 32.2% | +0.4pp | |||||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 21.4% | 1st | -2.2pp | 1st | 40% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 35.6% | 16th | -3.6pp | 2nd | on par with peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 46.9% | 31st | -3.4pp | 3rd | 32% above peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 36.9% | 20th | -1.2pp | 4th | 4% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 43.5% | 28th | -1.4pp | 5th | 22% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 43.8% | 29th | -1.3pp | 6th | 23% above peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 36.8% | 19th | -0.7pp | 7th | 3% above peers | ||
| Daytona Beach, FL | 44.1% | 30th | -0.5pp | 8th | 24% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 37.2% | 22nd | -0.3pp | 9th | 4% above peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 30.5% | 10th | -0.1pp | 10th | 14% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 40.0% | 25th | +0.0pp | 11th | 13% above peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 28.5% | 7th | +0.2pp | 12th | 20% below peers | ||
| Bloomington, IL | 24.4% | 3rd | +0.3pp | 13th | 32% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 37.1% | 21st | +0.8pp | 14th | 4% above peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 28.1% | 5th | +0.6pp | 15th | 21% below peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 36.0% | 17th | +1.4pp | 16th | 1% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 29.2% | 8th | +1.3pp | 17th | 18% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 39.5% | 24th | +2.1pp | 18th | 11% above peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 32.5% | 14th | +1.9pp | 19th | 9% below peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 32.2% | 12th | +2.2pp | 20th | 10% below peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 32.3% | 13th | +2.3pp | 21st | 9% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 42.7% | 27th | +3.1pp | 22nd | 20% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 41.8% | 26th | +3.3pp | 23rd | 18% above peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 28.2% | 6th | +3.9pp | 24th | 21% below peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 34.7% | 15th | +5.7pp | 25th | 2% below peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 24.4% | 2nd | +4.1pp | 26th | 32% below peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 30.8% | 11th | +5.5pp | 27th | 14% below peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 30.4% | 9th | +5.6pp | 28th | 15% below peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 37.7% | 23rd | +7.0pp | 29th | 6% above peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 25.6% | 4th | +4.9pp | 30th | 28% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 36.8% | 18th | +10.8pp | 31st | 3% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
No vehicle fell 5.4 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 13.1% to 7.7% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.1pp). 2 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin ref | 6.4% | -0.3pp | |||||
| United States ref | 8.3% | -0.3pp | |||||
| Racine, WI | 7.7% | 25th | -5.4pp | 1st | 25% above peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 5.9% | 15th | -2.6pp | 2nd | 3% below peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 8.3% | 27th | -2.1pp | 3rd | 36% above peers | ||
| Daytona Beach, FL | 11.3% | 30th | -2.0pp | 4th | 84% above peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 6.7% | 19th | -1.1pp | 5th | 9% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 4.7% | 11th | -0.5pp | 6th | 24% below peers | ||
| Bloomington, IL | 7.2% | 23rd | -0.5pp | 7th | 18% above peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 2.2% | 2nd | -0.2pp | 8th | 63% below peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 10.7% | 29th | -0.5pp | 9th | 75% above peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 4.0% | 8th | -0.1pp | 10th | 34% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 5.4% | 14th | -0.1pp | 11th | 12% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 5.1% | 12th | -0.0pp | 12th | 16% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 8.1% | 26th | -0.0pp | 13th | 32% above peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 7.0% | 20th | +0.0pp | 14th | 14% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 10.0% | 28th | +0.2pp | 15th | 63% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 2.5% | 3rd | +0.0pp | 16th | 59% below peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 4.3% | 9th | +0.1pp | 17th | 29% below peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 7.6% | 24th | +0.2pp | 18th | 24% above peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 7.1% | 22nd | +0.2pp | 19th | 17% above peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 6.1% | 16th | +0.3pp | 20th | on par with peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 17.3% | 31st | +0.8pp | 21st | 182% above peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 4.4% | 10th | +0.3pp | 22nd | 28% below peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 5.4% | 13th | +0.7pp | 23rd | 12% below peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 7.1% | 21st | +1.2pp | 24th | 16% above peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 2.7% | 5th | +0.4pp | 25th | 56% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 2.6% | 4th | +0.5pp | 26th | 58% below peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 3.8% | 6th | +0.9pp | 27th | 38% below peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 1.6% | 1st | +0.5pp | 28th | 75% below peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 6.3% | 17th | +2.2pp | 29th | 3% above peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 6.4% | 18th | +2.5pp | 30th | 5% above peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 3.8% | 7th | +2.1pp | 31st | 38% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is within the margin, but each of the last 4 annual releases moved the 5-year average the same way. Direction is a reliable early signal; its size is not.
Uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (7.1% then, 8.1% now; margin ±1.2pp). The newest releases lean upward: each of the last 4 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin ref | 5.2% | -0.2pp | |||||
| United States ref | 8.2% | -0.4pp | |||||
| Carmichael, CA | 4.1% | 7th | -2.3pp | 1st | 33% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 1.9% | 1st | -1.1pp | 2nd | 68% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 3.8% | 6th | -1.5pp | 3rd | 37% below peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 5.9% | 15th | -1.7pp | 4th | 3% below peers | ||
| Daytona Beach, FL | 12.3% | 30th | -2.6pp | 5th | 103% above peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 4.4% | 11th | -0.9pp | 6th | 27% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 5.2% | 13th | -0.9pp | 7th | 15% below peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 9.5% | 25th | -1.7pp | 8th | 57% above peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 8.8% | 24th | -1.5pp | 9th | 46% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 6.2% | 17th | -0.8pp | 10th | 2% above peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 6.0% | 16th | -0.7pp | 11th | on par with peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 6.5% | 18th | -0.7pp | 12th | 7% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 4.2% | 8th | -0.5pp | 13th | 31% below peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 10.3% | 26th | -0.9pp | 14th | 70% above peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 6.5% | 19th | -0.6pp | 15th | 7% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 7.1% | 21st | -0.5pp | 16th | 18% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 2.9% | 3rd | +0.0pp | 17th | 53% below peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 4.4% | 10th | +0.1pp | 18th | 28% below peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 8.3% | 23rd | +0.2pp | 19th | 37% above peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 2.2% | 2nd | +0.1pp | 20th | 64% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 5.0% | 12th | +0.4pp | 21st | 18% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 10.4% | 27th | +0.9pp | 22nd | 72% above peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 16.7% | 31st | +1.8pp | 23rd | 176% above peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 8.2% | 22nd | +1.0pp | 24th | 35% above peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 7.0% | 20th | +1.3pp | 25th | 16% above peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 3.7% | 5th | +0.7pp | 26th | 40% below peers | ||
| Bloomington, IL | 5.3% | 14th | +1.1pp | 27th | 13% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 11.7% | 29th | +2.5pp | 28th | 94% above peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 3.0% | 4th | +0.7pp | 29th | 51% below peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 4.3% | 9th | +1.3pp | 30th | 29% below peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 11.2% | 28th | +4.3pp | 31st | 85% above peers |
Modeled estimate with no usable trend; the level is shown and no trend claims are made.
Adult obesity is about 50% above the peer median.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin ref | 37.8% | |||
| United States ref | 33.4% | |||
| Pleasanton, CA | 16.1% | 1st | 45% below peers | |
| Milpitas, CA | 17.1% | 2nd | 42% below peers | |
| Alameda, CA | 18.2% | 3rd | 38% below peers | |
| Redmond, WA | 19.3% | 4th | 35% below peers | |
| Loveland, CO | 22.2% | 5th | 25% below peers | |
| Broomfield, CO | 25.0% | 6th | 15% below peers | |
| Tustin, CA | 25.3% | 7th | 14% below peers | |
| Chino Hills, CA | 25.7% | 8th | 13% below peers | |
| Schaumburg, IL | 26.3% | 9th | 11% below peers | |
| Rochester Hills, MI | 26.4% | 10th | 11% below peers | |
| Flagstaff, AZ | 26.5% | 11th | 10% below peers | |
| Flower Mound, TX | 27.4% | 12th | 7% below peers | |
| Cedar Park, TX | 28.5% | 13th | 3% below peers | |
| Bellflower, CA | 28.7% | 14th | 3% below peers | |
| Missoula, MT | 29.3% | 15th | 1% below peers | |
| Napa, CA | 29.5% | 16th | on par with peers | |
| Evanston, IL | 29.8% | 17th | 1% above peers | |
| Woodbury, MN | 30.2% | 18th | 2% above peers | |
| Pittsburg, CA | 31.7% | 19th | 7% above peers | |
| Mableton, GA | 33.2% | 20th | 13% above peers | |
| Carmichael, CA | 34.4% | 21st | 17% above peers | |
| Bloomington, IL | 34.5% | 22nd | 17% above peers | |
| Rapid City, SD | 35.4% | 23rd | 20% above peers | |
| Missouri City, TX | 35.4% | 24th | 20% above peers | |
| Wyoming, MI | 36.4% | 25th | 23% above peers | |
| Bethlehem, PA | 36.4% | 26th | 23% above peers | |
| Mansfield, TX | 36.9% | 27th | 25% above peers | |
| Daytona Beach, FL | 38.0% | 28th | 29% above peers | |
| Southfield, MI | 38.8% | 29th | 32% above peers | |
| Hammond, IN | 41.8% | 30th | 42% above peers | |
| Racine, WI | 42.9% | 31st | 45% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Child uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (2.5% then, 2.9% now; margin ±1.5pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin ref | 4.1% | +0.3pp | |||||
| United States ref | 5.5% | +0.4pp | |||||
| Southfield, MI | 0.3% | 1st | -2.9pp | 1st | 90% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 1.8% | 7th | -3.2pp | 2nd | 50% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 1.4% | 6th | -2.5pp | 3rd | 60% below peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 2.2% | 8th | -3.2pp | 4th | 38% below peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 0.6% | 2nd | -0.3pp | 5th | 84% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 1.4% | 5th | -0.5pp | 6th | 61% below peers | ||
| Daytona Beach, FL | 5.1% | 25th | -1.1pp | 7th | 45% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 4.3% | 21st | -0.7pp | 8th | 22% above peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 6.0% | 26th | -0.9pp | 9th | 70% above peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 4.4% | 23rd | -0.6pp | 10th | 25% above peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 3.6% | 17th | -0.4pp | 11th | 1% above peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 3.5% | 16th | -0.1pp | 12th | on par with peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 6.1% | 27th | +0.2pp | 13th | 73% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 4.4% | 22nd | +0.2pp | 14th | 23% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 2.7% | 11th | +0.2pp | 15th | 23% below peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 2.4% | 10th | +0.2pp | 16th | 31% below peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 3.7% | 19th | +0.4pp | 17th | 4% above peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 3.2% | 15th | +0.3pp | 18th | 11% below peers | ||
| Bloomington, IL | 3.7% | 18th | +0.4pp | 19th | 4% above peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 2.9% | 12th | +0.3pp | 20th | 19% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 4.5% | 24th | +0.5pp | 21st | 26% above peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 7.7% | 29th | +1.2pp | 22nd | 117% above peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 2.4% | 9th | +0.4pp | 23rd | 33% below peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 2.9% | 13th | +0.7pp | 24th | 17% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 7.5% | 28th | +1.9pp | 25th | 110% above peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 3.1% | 14th | +0.9pp | 26th | 12% below peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 11.3% | 31st | +3.5pp | 27th | 219% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 3.7% | 20th | +1.3pp | 28th | 5% above peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 10.2% | 30th | +4.2pp | 29th | 187% above peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 1.1% | 3rd | +0.5pp | 30th | 68% below peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 1.3% | 4th | +0.7pp | 31st | 65% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
College attainment rose 4.8 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 16.6% to 21.4% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.2pp). 19 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin ref | 33.4% | +3.3pp | |||||
| United States ref | 35.7% | +3.5pp | |||||
| Racine, WI | 21.4% | 30th | +4.8pp | 1st | 55% below peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 25.5% | 27th | +4.8pp | 2nd | 46% below peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 36.0% | 25th | +6.8pp | 3rd | 24% below peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 17.4% | 31st | +3.1pp | 4th | 63% below peers | ||
| Daytona Beach, FL | 27.8% | 26th | +4.7pp | 5th | 41% below peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 21.6% | 29th | +3.1pp | 6th | 54% below peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 58.2% | 9th | +7.5pp | 7th | 23% above peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 37.0% | 23rd | +4.2pp | 8th | 22% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 61.5% | 5th | +6.9pp | 9th | 30% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 23.6% | 28th | +2.5pp | 10th | 50% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 38.2% | 22nd | +4.0pp | 11th | 19% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 52.3% | 12th | +5.2pp | 12th | 10% above peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 55.6% | 10th | +5.5pp | 13th | 17% above peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 53.0% | 11th | +5.1pp | 14th | 12% above peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 36.7% | 24th | +3.2pp | 15th | 23% below peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 47.4% | 16th | +3.6pp | 16th | on par with peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 60.3% | 8th | +4.6pp | 17th | 27% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 40.7% | 19th | +2.9pp | 18th | 14% below peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 69.8% | 2nd | +5.0pp | 19th | 47% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 61.4% | 6th | +4.0pp | 20th | 30% above peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 39.0% | 20th | +2.2pp | 21st | 18% below peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 65.5% | 4th | +3.5pp | 22nd | 38% above peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 75.3% | 1st | +3.5pp | 23rd | 59% above peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 61.3% | 7th | +2.3pp | 24th | 29% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 69.5% | 3rd | +2.4pp | 25th | 47% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 48.1% | 15th | +1.4pp | 26th | 2% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 50.4% | 13th | +1.0pp | 27th | 6% above peers | ||
| Bloomington, IL | 48.8% | 14th | +0.5pp | 28th | 3% above peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 38.7% | 21st | +0.4pp | 29th | 18% below peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 42.5% | 17th | +0.3pp | 30th | 10% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 41.8% | 18th | -1.9pp | 31st | 12% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin, in the wrong direction for this metric.
Preschool enrollment fell 17.2 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 50.7% to 33.5% - more than the combined survey margin (±12.2pp). That reverses the previous span, which went up between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys. 10 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin ref | 41.5% | -2.5pp | |||||
| United States ref | 45.5% | ||||||
| Cedar Park, TX | 76.6% | 1st | +20.8pp | 1st | 69% above peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 49.3% | 12th | +7.0pp | 2nd | 9% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 45.4% | 16th | +6.0pp | 3rd | on par with peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 54.7% | 8th | +6.5pp | 4th | 21% above peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 69.8% | 2nd | +4.1pp | 5th | 54% above peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 58.0% | 6th | +3.4pp | 6th | 28% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 39.6% | 22nd | -0.4pp | 7th | 13% below peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 64.5% | 3rd | -0.8pp | 8th | 42% above peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 61.1% | 4th | -1.4pp | 9th | 35% above peers | ||
| Daytona Beach, FL | 39.8% | 21st | -1.7pp | 10th | 12% below peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 51.3% | 10th | -2.9pp | 11th | 13% above peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 37.6% | 26th | -2.4pp | 12th | 17% below peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 41.5% | 20th | -5.0pp | 13th | 9% below peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 45.9% | 15th | -6.6pp | 14th | 1% above peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 50.9% | 11th | -8.2pp | 15th | 12% above peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 37.9% | 25th | -6.1pp | 16th | 17% below peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 38.2% | 24th | -6.5pp | 17th | 16% below peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 59.7% | 5th | -12.4pp | 18th | 32% above peers | ||
| Bloomington, IL | 46.9% | 14th | -11.2pp | 19th | 3% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 51.5% | 9th | -12.5pp | 20th | 14% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 45.2% | 17th | -11.8pp | 21st | on par with peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 37.2% | 27th | -10.9pp | 22nd | 18% below peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 29.5% | 31st | -8.9pp | 23rd | 35% below peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 33.1% | 30th | -10.1pp | 24th | 27% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 55.2% | 7th | -17.1pp | 25th | 22% above peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 48.0% | 13th | -21.9pp | 26th | 6% above peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 33.3% | 29th | -16.4pp | 27th | 27% below peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 45.2% | 18th | -23.0pp | 28th | on par with peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 33.5% | 28th | -17.2pp | 29th | 26% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 41.9% | 19th | -22.6pp | 30th | 8% below peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 38.9% | 23rd | -23.7pp | 31st | 14% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Disconnected youth changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (10.6% then, 11.5% now; margin ±6.1pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin ref | 5.4% | +0.4pp | |||||
| United States ref | 6.9% | +0.3pp | |||||
| Bloomington, IL | 2.0% | 2nd | -3.5pp | 1st | 52% below peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 4.2% | 17th | -3.5pp | 2nd | on par with peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 6.0% | 19th | -4.9pp | 3rd | 43% above peers | ||
| Daytona Beach, FL | 3.1% | 10th | -2.2pp | 4th | 27% below peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 2.5% | 4th | -1.7pp | 5th | 40% below peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 6.3% | 22nd | -3.7pp | 6th | 50% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 8.2% | 26th | -1.3pp | 7th | 95% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 4.2% | 16th | -0.6pp | 8th | on par with peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 3.6% | 14th | -0.4pp | 9th | 13% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 3.6% | 13th | -0.2pp | 10th | 14% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 0.9% | 1st | -0.0pp | 11th | 78% below peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 8.3% | 27th | -0.2pp | 12th | 100% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 2.5% | 5th | +0.1pp | 13th | 39% below peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 3.0% | 8th | +0.2pp | 14th | 27% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 11.5% | 30th | +1.0pp | 15th | 176% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 3.0% | 9th | +0.3pp | 16th | 27% below peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 3.4% | 12th | +0.5pp | 17th | 19% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 3.9% | 15th | +0.6pp | 18th | 7% below peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 2.8% | 7th | +0.6pp | 19th | 33% below peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 6.2% | 21st | +1.5pp | 20th | 49% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 8.0% | 25th | +2.3pp | 21st | 90% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 9.6% | 28th | +2.9pp | 22nd | 130% above peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 2.1% | 3rd | +0.6pp | 23rd | 50% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 7.3% | 24th | +2.5pp | 24th | 74% above peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 9.9% | 29th | +3.9pp | 25th | 138% above peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 7.0% | 23rd | +3.7pp | 26th | 67% above peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 3.2% | 11th | +1.9pp | 27th | 24% below peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 2.8% | 6th | +2.1pp | 28th | 34% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 5.3% | 18th | +4.4pp | 29th | 27% above peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 6.2% | 20th | +5.7pp | 30th | 49% above peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 13.1% | 31st | +12.3pp | 31st | 212% above peers |
A real change beyond the survey margin; neither direction is inherently better for this metric.
Population rose about 1% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 77,081 to 77,633 - more than the combined survey margin (±76). That reverses the previous span, which went down between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys. 22 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mableton, GA | 77,678 | 13th | +87% | 1st | on par with peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 76,948 | 21st | +19% | 2nd | 1% below peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 77,353 | 16th | +18% | 3rd | on par with peers | ||
| Daytona Beach, FL | 78,992 | 1st | +17% | 4th | 2% above peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 76,304 | 29th | +12% | 5th | 1% below peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 78,305 | 7th | +12% | 6th | 1% above peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 77,510 | 15th | +11% | 7th | on par with peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 76,257 | 30th | +7% | 8th | 1% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 76,445 | 27th | +6% | 9th | 1% below peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 78,301 | 8th | +5% | 10th | 1% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 76,236 | 31st | +4% | 11th | 1% below peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 77,089 | 19th | +4% | 12th | on par with peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 76,514 | 26th | +4% | 13th | 1% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 76,868 | 22nd | +4% | 14th | 1% below peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 77,946 | 11th | +4% | 15th | 1% above peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 77,956 | 10th | +3% | 16th | 1% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 76,558 | 25th | +3% | 17th | 1% below peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 78,389 | 6th | +2% | 18th | 1% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 76,340 | 28th | +2% | 19th | 1% below peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 77,353 | 17th | +2% | 20th | on par with peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 78,410 | 5th | +2% | 21st | 1% above peers | ||
| Bloomington, IL | 78,907 | 3rd | +1% | 22nd | 2% above peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 77,633 | 14th | +1% | 23rd | on par with peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 76,768 | 24th | +0% | 24th | 1% below peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 76,819 | 23rd | -0% | 25th | 1% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 78,239 | 9th | -1% | 26th | 1% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 78,981 | 2nd | -1% | 27th | 2% above peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 78,578 | 4th | -1% | 28th | 2% above peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 77,238 | 18th | -2% | 29th | on par with peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 77,927 | 12th | -3% | 30th | 1% above peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 76,960 | 20th | -6% | 31st | 1% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Single-parent changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (56.4% then, 57.1% now; margin ±7.4pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin ref | 29.7% | +0.5pp | |||||
| United States ref | 29.9% | -0.2pp | |||||
| Loveland, CO | 30.4% | 13th | +8.8pp | 1st | 15% above peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 42.5% | 5th | +12.0pp | 2nd | 61% above peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 36.5% | 7th | +9.6pp | 3rd | 39% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 14.2% | 27th | +3.2pp | 4th | 46% below peers | ||
| Bloomington, IL | 30.5% | 11th | +5.5pp | 5th | 16% above peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 18.0% | 23rd | +3.2pp | 6th | 32% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 22.4% | 21st | +3.2pp | 7th | 15% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 34.8% | 8th | +4.9pp | 8th | 32% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 29.1% | 14th | +3.6pp | 9th | 10% above peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 25.0% | 19th | +3.0pp | 10th | 5% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 26.4% | 16th | +2.9pp | 11th | on par with peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 38.2% | 6th | +3.1pp | 12th | 45% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 51.2% | 3rd | +3.5pp | 13th | 94% above peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 11.3% | 30th | +0.7pp | 14th | 57% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 25.6% | 18th | +1.6pp | 15th | 3% below peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 16.5% | 26th | +1.0pp | 16th | 37% below peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 30.5% | 12th | +1.8pp | 17th | 16% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 20.2% | 22nd | +1.0pp | 18th | 24% below peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 18.0% | 24th | +0.7pp | 19th | 32% below peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 17.2% | 25th | +0.5pp | 20th | 35% below peers | ||
| Daytona Beach, FL | 64.9% | 1st | +1.1pp | 21st | 146% above peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 57.1% | 2nd | +0.7pp | 22nd | 117% above peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 12.1% | 29th | -0.1pp | 23rd | 54% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 13.7% | 28th | -0.7pp | 24th | 48% below peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 11.3% | 31st | -1.0pp | 25th | 57% below peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 44.0% | 4th | -5.0pp | 26th | 67% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 24.8% | 20th | -3.6pp | 27th | 6% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 34.5% | 9th | -6.6pp | 28th | 31% above peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 32.1% | 10th | -9.1pp | 29th | 22% above peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 28.1% | 15th | -8.3pp | 30th | 7% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 26.1% | 17th | -9.4pp | 31st | 1% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Working parents changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (68.8% then, 78.3% now; margin ±11.5pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin ref | 73.1% | -0.7pp | |||||
| United States ref | 68.1% | +1.9pp | |||||
| Schaumburg, IL | 66.0% | 24th | +10.7pp | 1st | 5% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 77.6% | 6th | +12.6pp | 2nd | 12% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 68.4% | 17th | +11.0pp | 3rd | 1% below peers | ||
| Daytona Beach, FL | 67.4% | 20th | +10.2pp | 4th | 2% below peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 69.2% | 16th | +9.3pp | 5th | on par with peers | ||
| Milpitas, CA | 68.2% | 18th | +8.6pp | 6th | 1% below peers | ||
| Pleasanton, CA | 65.9% | 25th | +8.1pp | 7th | 5% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 78.3% | 5th | +9.5pp | 8th | 13% above peers | ||
| Redmond, WA | 57.6% | 29th | +6.9pp | 9th | 17% below peers | ||
| Woodbury, MN | 83.3% | 1st | +8.8pp | 10th | 20% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 62.3% | 27th | +6.4pp | 11th | 10% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 80.9% | 3rd | +7.0pp | 12th | 17% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 66.0% | 23rd | +5.5pp | 13th | 5% below peers | ||
| Mableton, GA | 81.4% | 2nd | +6.6pp | 14th | 18% above peers | ||
| Bloomington, IL | 70.8% | 13th | +5.4pp | 15th | 2% above peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 71.5% | 11th | +5.1pp | 16th | 3% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 68.0% | 19th | +3.8pp | 17th | 2% below peers | ||
| Missoula, MT | 79.7% | 4th | +4.2pp | 18th | 15% above peers | ||
| Loveland, CO | 66.7% | 22nd | +3.2pp | 19th | 4% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 75.8% | 8th | +3.2pp | 20th | 10% above peers | ||
| Wyoming, MI | 73.9% | 10th | +2.2pp | 21st | 7% above peers | ||
| Bellflower, CA | 67.4% | 21st | +2.0pp | 22nd | 3% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 74.2% | 9th | +2.1pp | 23rd | 7% above peers | ||
| Mansfield, TX | 76.0% | 7th | +1.9pp | 24th | 10% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 70.4% | 15th | -0.7pp | 25th | 2% above peers | ||
| Bethlehem, PA | 71.1% | 12th | -2.1pp | 26th | 3% above peers | ||
| Cedar Park, TX | 56.0% | 31st | -2.5pp | 27th | 19% below peers | ||
| Flower Mound, TX | 57.0% | 30th | -3.1pp | 28th | 18% below peers | ||
| Rapid City, SD | 70.4% | 14th | -7.2pp | 29th | 2% above peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 59.4% | 28th | -6.3pp | 30th | 14% below peers | ||
| Broomfield, CO | 65.7% | 26th | -8.2pp | 31st | 5% below peers |