The last 12 months moved in the better direction. The multi-year trend has not (yet) passed the checks below, so no sustained-improvement claim is made.
Violent crime fell about 5% over the 12 months ending July 2026, slower than 62% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 456 (Apr 26) | -9.3% | |||
| Bismarck, ND | 250 (Jul 26) | -42.0% | 1st | ||
| Tustin, CA | 191 (Jul 26) | -26.2% | 2nd | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 38 (Jul 26) | -23.7% | 3rd | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 368 (Jul 26) | -23.2% | 4th | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 59 (Jul 26) | -22.4% | 5th | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 57 (Jul 26) | -18.5% | 6th | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 378 (Jun 26) | -17.8% | 7th | ||
| Blaine, MN | 74 (Jul 26) | -16.2% | 8th | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 128 (Jul 26) | -16.1% | 9th | ||
| New Britain, CT | 366 (Jul 26) | -12.5% | 10th | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 218 (Jul 26) | -12.5% | 11th | ||
| Napa, CA | 212 (Jul 26) | -11.0% | 12th | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 272 (Jul 26) | -7.2% | 13th | ||
| Alameda, CA | 329 (Jul 26) | -5.2% | 14th | ||
| Southfield, MI | 501 (Jul 25) | -4.6% | 15th | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 120 (Jul 26) | -4.2% | 16th | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 365 (Jul 26) | +0.4% | 17th | ||
| Evanston, IL | 131 (Jun 26) | +5.3% | 18th | ||
| Racine, WI | 408 (Apr 26) | +6.4% | 19th | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 505 (Jan 26) | +7.2% | 20th | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 69 (Jul 26) | +12.8% | 21st | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 170 (Jul 26) | +15.8% | 22nd |
The last 12 months moved in the better direction. The multi-year trend has not (yet) passed the checks below, so no sustained-improvement claim is made. Most of the selected peers are improving faster than Alameda.
Property crime fell about 4% over the 12 months ending July 2026, slower than 76% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 1,987 (Apr 26) | -12.2% | |||
| Bismarck, ND | 1,692 (Jul 26) | -49.5% | 1st | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 483 (Jul 26) | -40.6% | 2nd | ||
| Tustin, CA | 1,504 (Jul 26) | -33.7% | 3rd | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 469 (Jul 26) | -28.6% | 4th | ||
| Napa, CA | 1,044 (Jul 26) | -24.1% | 5th | ||
| Evanston, IL | 1,969 (Jun 26) | -23.3% | 6th | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 430 (Jul 26) | -19.7% | 7th | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 1,644 (Jul 26) | -15.9% | 8th | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 931 (Jul 26) | -13.7% | 9th | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 1,222 (Jul 26) | -12.1% | 10th | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 1,520 (Jul 26) | -11.9% | 11th | ||
| Southfield, MI | 2,247 (Jul 26) | -10.4% | 12th | ||
| Blaine, MN | 1,029 (Jul 26) | -8.3% | 13th | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 1,768 (Jul 26) | -7.5% | 14th | ||
| New Britain, CT | 1,772 (Jul 26) | -5.7% | 15th | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 2,134 (Jan 26) | -3.5% | 16th | ||
| Alameda, CA | 3,616 (Jul 26) | -3.5% | 17th | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 2,295 (Jun 26) | -0.2% | 18th | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 1,084 (Jul 26) | +2.6% | 19th | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 844 (Jul 26) | +6.1% | 20th | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 880 (Jul 26) | +11.6% | 21st | ||
| Racine, WI | 1,658 (Jul 26) | +36.7% | 22nd |
No meaningful movement over the window.
Homicide was essentially flat from 2021 to 2026.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 6 (Apr 26) | -17.8% | |||
| Blaine, MN | 0 (Jul 26) | -100.0% | 1st | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 0 (Jul 26) | -100.0% | 2nd | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 1 (Jul 26) | -75.0% | 3rd | ||
| Napa, CA | 1 (Jul 26) | -74.9% | 4th | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 1 (Jul 26) | -66.8% | 5th | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 3 (Jan 26) | -50.0% | 6th | ||
| Racine, WI | 3 (Jul 26) | -49.9% | 7th | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 8 (Jun 26) | -14.3% | 8th | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 4 (Jul 26) | +0.0% | 9th | ||
| New Britain, CT | 3 (Jul 26) | +0.0% | 10th | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 1 (Jul 26) | +0.0% | 11th | ||
| Tustin, CA | 4 (Jul 26) | +0.0% | 12th | ||
| Southfield, MI | 8 (Jul 26) | +199.6% | 13th | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 4 (Jul 26) | +200.8% | 14th | ||
| Alameda, CA | 0 (Jul 26) | ||||
| Rocklin, CA | 0 (Jul 26) | ||||
| Caldwell, ID | 1 (Jul 26) | ||||
| Evanston, IL | 0 (Jun 26) | ||||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 1 (Jul 26) | ||||
| Noblesville, IN | 0 (Jul 26) | ||||
| Ankeny, IA | 3 (Jul 26) | ||||
| Bismarck, ND | 4 (Jul 26) |
The last 12 months moved in the better direction. The multi-year trend has not (yet) passed the checks below, so no sustained-improvement claim is made. Most of the selected peers are improving faster than Alameda.
Vehicle theft fell about 6% over the 12 months ending July 2026, slower than 76% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 303 (Apr 26) | -22.2% | |||
| Bismarck, ND | 141 (Jul 26) | -54.4% | 1st | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 52 (Jul 26) | -52.9% | 2nd | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 39 (Jul 26) | -50.8% | 3rd | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 49 (Jul 26) | -47.9% | 4th | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 38 (Jul 26) | -43.1% | 5th | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 34 (Jul 26) | -40.9% | 6th | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 71 (Jul 26) | -34.5% | 7th | ||
| Napa, CA | 88 (Jul 26) | -29.5% | 8th | ||
| Tustin, CA | 125 (Jul 26) | -29.2% | 9th | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 102 (Jan 26) | -28.8% | 10th | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 109 (Jul 26) | -20.2% | 11th | ||
| Evanston, IL | 140 (Jun 26) | -20.1% | 12th | ||
| Southfield, MI | 426 (Jul 26) | -16.5% | 13th | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 224 (Jul 26) | -13.9% | 14th | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 209 (Jun 26) | -13.6% | 15th | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 193 (Jul 26) | -9.7% | 16th | ||
| Alameda, CA | 643 (Jul 26) | -6.1% | 17th | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 46 (Jul 26) | -2.8% | 18th | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 43 (Jul 26) | +6.5% | 19th | ||
| Blaine, MN | 69 (Jul 26) | +10.4% | 20th | ||
| New Britain, CT | 501 (Jul 26) | +16.5% | 21st | ||
| Racine, WI | 252 (Jul 26) | +20.2% | 22nd |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Household income rose about 31% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from $104,756 to $137,697 (each survey's own dollars, not adjusted for inflation) - more than the combined survey margin (±$6,806).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | $99,122 | +32% | |||||
| United States ref | $80,734 | +28% | |||||
| Caldwell, ID | $73,058 | 21st | +49% | 1st | 24% below peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | $86,728 | 18th | +41% | 2nd | 10% below peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | $68,771 | 23rd | +36% | 3rd | 29% below peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | $68,310 | 25th | +35% | 4th | 29% below peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | $99,861 | 14th | +34% | 5th | 4% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | $112,503 | 7th | +33% | 6th | 17% above peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | $85,914 | 19th | +33% | 7th | 11% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | $137,697 | 1st | +31% | 8th | 43% above peers | ||
| Racine, WI | $57,740 | 29th | +31% | 9th | 40% below peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | $103,974 | 13th | +29% | 10th | 8% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | $120,694 | 4th | +28% | 11th | 25% above peers | ||
| Lakewood, CA | $119,177 | 5th | +28% | 12th | 24% above peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | $49,919 | 31st | +27% | 13th | 48% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | $68,613 | 24th | +27% | 14th | 29% below peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | $51,281 | 30th | +27% | 15th | 47% below peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | $104,047 | 12th | +27% | 16th | 8% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | $107,504 | 9th | +27% | 17th | 11% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | $105,963 | 11th | +26% | 18th | 10% above peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | $58,613 | 27th | +26% | 19th | 39% below peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | $124,168 | 3rd | +26% | 20th | 29% above peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | $106,801 | 10th | +26% | 21st | 11% above peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | $108,198 | 8th | +25% | 22nd | 12% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | $68,166 | 26th | +22% | 23rd | 29% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | $96,434 | 16th | +22% | 24th | on par with peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | $71,512 | 22nd | +22% | 25th | 26% below peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | $78,387 | 20th | +22% | 26th | 19% below peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | $116,723 | 6th | +21% | 27th | 21% above peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | $58,546 | 28th | +19% | 28th | 39% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | $126,334 | 2nd | +19% | 29th | 31% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | $97,514 | 15th | +17% | 30th | 1% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | $94,390 | 17th | +7% | 31st | 2% below peers |
The last 12 months moved in the better direction. The multi-year trend has not (yet) passed the checks below, so no sustained-improvement claim is made. Alameda is also improving faster than most of the selected peers.
Unemployment fell 0.3 percentage points over the 12 months ending July 2026, faster than 67% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 5.1% (Jul 26) | -0.4pp | ||||
| United States ref | 4.1% (Aug 26) | -0.2pp | ||||
| Pawtucket, RI | 4.2% (Jul 26) | 11th | -1.0pp | 1st | 7% below peers | |
| Rock Hill, SC | 5.1% (Jul 26) | 23rd | -0.8pp | 2nd | 13% above peers | |
| Bismarck, ND | 2.0% (Jul 26) | 1st | -0.6pp | 3rd | 56% below peers | |
| Gulfport, MS | 3.5% (Jul 26) | 6th | -0.5pp | 4th | 22% below peers | |
| Lakewood, CA | 5.0% (Jul 26) | 22nd | -0.5pp | 5th | 11% above peers | |
| Caldwell, ID | 3.8% (Jul 26) | 7th | -0.4pp | 6th | 16% below peers | |
| Ankeny, IA | 3.1% (Jul 26) | 2nd | -0.4pp | 7th | 31% below peers | |
| Napa, CA | 4.1% (Jul 26) | 9th | -0.3pp | 8th | 9% below peers | |
| Tustin, CA | 4.1% (Jul 26) | 10th | -0.3pp | 9th | 9% below peers | |
| Alameda, CA | 4.9% (Jul 26) | 19th | -0.3pp | 10th | 9% above peers | |
| Chino Hills, CA | 4.3% (Jul 26) | 13th | -0.3pp | 11th | 4% below peers | |
| Rocklin, CA | 4.5% (Jul 26) | 15th | -0.2pp | 12th | on par with peers | |
| Iowa City, IA | 3.2% (Jul 26) | 4th | -0.2pp | 13th | 29% below peers | |
| Noblesville, IN | 3.2% (Jul 26) | 5th | -0.2pp | 14th | 29% below peers | |
| Pittsburg, CA | 5.4% (Jul 26) | 25th | -0.2pp | 15th | 20% above peers | |
| Racine, WI | 4.6% (Jul 26) | 17th | -0.1pp | 16th | 2% above peers | |
| Rogers, AR | 3.1% (Jul 26) | 3rd | -0.1pp | 17th | 31% below peers | |
| Schaumburg, IL | 4.5% (Jul 26) | 16th | +0.1pp | 18th | on par with peers | |
| Marysville, WA | 4.9% (Jul 26) | 20th | +0.1pp | 19th | 9% above peers | |
| Rochester Hills, MI | 3.9% (Jul 26) | 8th | +0.2pp | 20th | 13% below peers | |
| Evanston, IL | 4.9% (Jul 26) | 21st | +0.2pp | 21st | 9% above peers | |
| San Marcos, TX | 4.2% (Jul 26) | 12th | +0.3pp | 22nd | 7% below peers | |
| Missouri City, TX | 5.7% (Jul 26) | 26th | +0.4pp | 23rd | 27% above peers | |
| Arlington Heights, IL | 4.4% (Jul 26) | 14th | +0.4pp | 24th | 2% below peers | |
| Southfield, MI | 6.9% (Jul 26) | 27th | +0.4pp | 25th | 53% above peers | |
| Flagstaff, AZ | 5.1% (Jul 26) | 24th | +0.5pp | 26th | 13% above peers | |
| Blaine, MN | 4.7% (Jul 26) | 18th | +0.7pp | 27th | 4% above peers | |
| New Britain, CT | 8.3% (Jul 26) | 28th | +2.1pp | 28th | 84% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Poverty changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (7.3% then, 7.2% now; margin ±1.4pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 12.0% | -1.3pp | |||||
| United States ref | 12.4% | ||||||
| Caldwell, ID | 11.9% | 22nd | -4.6pp | 1st | 20% above peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 4.2% | 1st | -1.2pp | 2nd | 58% below peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 5.3% | 3rd | -1.3pp | 3rd | 47% below peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 12.6% | 23rd | -3.0pp | 4th | 27% above peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 18.1% | 26th | -3.6pp | 5th | 82% above peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 26.9% | 31st | -5.2pp | 6th | 172% above peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 13.3% | 25th | -2.3pp | 7th | 34% above peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 18.2% | 28th | -2.8pp | 8th | 84% above peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 22.8% | 29th | -3.5pp | 9th | 130% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 11.2% | 20th | -1.7pp | 10th | 13% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 9.9% | 16th | -1.5pp | 11th | on par with peers | ||
| Lakewood, CA | 5.8% | 6th | -0.8pp | 12th | 42% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 11.8% | 21st | -1.6pp | 13th | 19% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 5.7% | 5th | -0.7pp | 14th | 43% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 10.2% | 17th | -1.0pp | 15th | 3% above peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 12.6% | 24th | -0.7pp | 16th | 27% above peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 26.3% | 30th | -1.3pp | 17th | 166% above peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 7.2% | 10th | -0.1pp | 18th | 28% below peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 5.6% | 4th | -0.0pp | 19th | 43% below peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 10.5% | 18th | +0.0pp | 20th | 6% above peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 10.7% | 19th | +0.1pp | 21st | 8% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 6.4% | 8th | +0.0pp | 22nd | 35% below peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 9.3% | 15th | +0.1pp | 23rd | 6% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 18.2% | 27th | +0.7pp | 24th | 84% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 8.5% | 14th | +0.5pp | 25th | 14% below peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 5.2% | 2nd | +0.4pp | 26th | 48% below peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 8.1% | 13th | +0.9pp | 27th | 18% below peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 7.2% | 11th | +1.4pp | 28th | 27% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 7.6% | 12th | +1.6pp | 29th | 23% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 7.1% | 9th | +2.4pp | 30th | 29% below peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 6.0% | 7th | +2.1pp | 31st | 39% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Child poverty fell 4.6 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 8.4% to 3.8% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.2pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 15.0% | -3.1pp | |||||
| United States ref | 16.1% | ||||||
| Southfield, MI | 5.9% | 9th | -8.2pp | 1st | 40% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 3.8% | 2nd | -4.6pp | 2nd | 62% below peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 18.1% | 28th | -15.9pp | 3rd | 82% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 4.4% | 5th | -3.4pp | 4th | 56% below peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 17.3% | 25th | -7.1pp | 5th | 73% above peers | ||
| Lakewood, CA | 5.3% | 7th | -2.1pp | 6th | 47% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 5.3% | 6th | -2.1pp | 7th | 47% below peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 24.0% | 30th | -9.4pp | 8th | 141% above peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 15.6% | 20th | -5.1pp | 9th | 57% above peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 3.9% | 3rd | -1.2pp | 10th | 61% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 23.8% | 29th | -6.5pp | 11th | 139% above peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 14.2% | 19th | -3.6pp | 12th | 43% above peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 17.5% | 27th | -4.3pp | 13th | 76% above peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 31.6% | 31st | -7.5pp | 14th | 217% above peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 6.1% | 10th | -1.3pp | 15th | 39% below peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 3.4% | 1st | -0.6pp | 16th | 66% below peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 13.5% | 18th | -2.4pp | 17th | 36% above peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 17.1% | 24th | -2.9pp | 18th | 72% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 16.5% | 22nd | -0.3pp | 19th | 66% above peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 17.5% | 26th | +1.0pp | 20th | 76% above peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 16.4% | 21st | +1.2pp | 21st | 65% above peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 9.7% | 13th | +0.8pp | 22nd | 3% below peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 8.3% | 11th | +0.9pp | 23rd | 17% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 10.0% | 16th | +1.3pp | 24th | on par with peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 9.7% | 14th | +1.3pp | 25th | 3% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 11.4% | 17th | +1.6pp | 26th | 15% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 5.8% | 8th | +1.3pp | 27th | 42% below peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 9.9% | 15th | +2.9pp | 28th | 1% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 9.4% | 12th | +4.0pp | 29th | 6% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 16.6% | 23rd | +7.3pp | 30th | 67% above peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 4.3% | 4th | +2.9pp | 31st | 57% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Broadband rose 4.4 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 90.7% to 95.0% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.3pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 93.6% | +6.6pp | |||||
| United States ref | 91.1% | ||||||
| Rogers, AR | 93.8% | 17th | +26.5pp | 1st | on par with peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 85.1% | 31st | +12.4pp | 2nd | 9% below peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 85.3% | 30th | +10.4pp | 3rd | 9% below peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 86.0% | 29th | +10.1pp | 4th | 8% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 89.2% | 24th | +9.9pp | 5th | 5% below peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 92.4% | 19th | +10.1pp | 6th | 2% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 88.4% | 26th | +8.7pp | 7th | 6% below peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 89.6% | 23rd | +8.7pp | 8th | 5% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 91.9% | 21st | +8.3pp | 9th | 2% below peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 88.2% | 27th | +6.3pp | 10th | 6% below peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 95.2% | 10th | +6.2pp | 11th | 1% above peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 91.3% | 22nd | +5.2pp | 12th | 3% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 94.2% | 15th | +5.0pp | 13th | on par with peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 93.9% | 16th | +4.7pp | 14th | on par with peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 93.4% | 18th | +4.6pp | 15th | on par with peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 96.5% | 3rd | +4.7pp | 16th | 3% above peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 95.0% | 11th | +4.4pp | 17th | 1% above peers | ||
| Lakewood, CA | 94.7% | 12th | +4.2pp | 18th | 1% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 95.6% | 7th | +4.1pp | 19th | 2% above peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 96.6% | 2nd | +3.9pp | 20th | 3% above peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 95.3% | 9th | +3.9pp | 21st | 2% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 95.4% | 8th | +3.7pp | 22nd | 2% above peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 94.7% | 13th | +3.6pp | 23rd | 1% above peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 94.3% | 14th | +3.5pp | 24th | on par with peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 88.7% | 25th | +3.0pp | 25th | 6% below peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 95.9% | 6th | +2.7pp | 26th | 2% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 97.6% | 1st | +2.7pp | 27th | 4% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 96.3% | 4th | +2.5pp | 28th | 3% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 96.3% | 5th | +1.7pp | 29th | 3% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 92.1% | 20th | +1.4pp | 30th | 2% below peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 86.5% | 28th | -0.6pp | 31st | 8% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin, in the wrong direction for this metric.
Inequality rose about 7% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 0.44 to 0.47 - more than the combined survey margin (±0.02). That reverses the previous span, which went down between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys. That is movement in the wrong direction.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 0.49 | +0.000 | |||||
| United States ref | 0.48 | +0.001 | |||||
| Rogers, AR | 0.46 | 23rd | -0.041 | 1st | 6% above peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 0.43 | 15th | -0.034 | 2nd | 1% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 0.41 | 9th | -0.030 | 3rd | 5% below peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 0.37 | 1st | -0.023 | 4th | 14% below peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 0.42 | 12th | -0.024 | 5th | 3% below peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 0.46 | 25th | -0.023 | 6th | 7% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 0.42 | 13th | -0.019 | 7th | 3% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 0.46 | 24th | -0.018 | 8th | 7% above peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 0.38 | 3rd | -0.013 | 9th | 12% below peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 0.43 | 16th | -0.014 | 10th | on par with peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 0.40 | 6th | -0.010 | 11th | 8% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 0.54 | 31st | -0.013 | 12th | 26% above peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 0.39 | 5th | -0.006 | 13th | 9% below peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 0.45 | 21st | -0.004 | 14th | 5% above peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 0.44 | 17th | -0.001 | 15th | 1% above peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 0.44 | 19th | +0.002 | 16th | 2% above peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 0.38 | 2nd | +0.003 | 17th | 13% below peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 0.41 | 7th | +0.003 | 18th | 5% below peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 0.49 | 29th | +0.006 | 19th | 14% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 0.44 | 20th | +0.009 | 20th | 3% above peers | ||
| Lakewood, CA | 0.39 | 4th | +0.011 | 21st | 10% below peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 0.53 | 30th | +0.015 | 22nd | 22% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 0.46 | 26th | +0.016 | 23rd | 7% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 0.41 | 8th | +0.016 | 24th | 5% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 0.49 | 28th | +0.023 | 25th | 13% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 0.41 | 11th | +0.022 | 26th | 5% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 0.46 | 22nd | +0.027 | 27th | 6% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 0.41 | 10th | +0.025 | 28th | 5% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 0.47 | 27th | +0.029 | 29th | 9% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 0.42 | 14th | +0.032 | 30th | 3% below peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 0.44 | 18th | +0.038 | 31st | 2% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin, in the wrong direction for this metric.
SNAP rose 2.9 percentage points between the 2014-2018 and 2019-2023 surveys, from 4.8% to 7.7% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.6pp). That is movement in the wrong direction.
| Place | Latest2019-2023 survey | Today's rank | Change2014-2018 → 2019-2023 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 11.4% | +2.2pp | |||||
| United States ref | 11.8% | -0.5pp | |||||
| Ankeny, IA | 3.1% | 1st | -2.3pp | 1st | 59% below peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 12.5% | 24th | -8.3pp | 2nd | 66% above peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 8.5% | 20th | -5.2pp | 3rd | 14% above peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 5.2% | 6th | -1.8pp | 4th | 31% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 21.2% | 29th | -6.9pp | 5th | 182% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 6.7% | 13th | -1.9pp | 6th | 10% below peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 6.6% | 11th | -1.6pp | 7th | 13% below peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 7.5% | 17th | -1.8pp | 8th | on par with peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 20.4% | 28th | -3.9pp | 9th | 172% above peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 28.1% | 31st | -3.8pp | 10th | 274% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 7.2% | 14th | -0.6pp | 11th | 4% below peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 3.8% | 2nd | -0.1pp | 12th | 50% below peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 22.5% | 30th | -0.6pp | 13th | 200% above peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 4.3% | 3rd | -0.1pp | 14th | 42% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 9.3% | 21st | -0.1pp | 15th | 24% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 14.8% | 27th | +0.0pp | 16th | 97% above peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 6.3% | 10th | +0.1pp | 17th | 16% below peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 10.8% | 22nd | +0.2pp | 18th | 44% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 7.5% | 15th | +0.2pp | 19th | 1% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 5.9% | 9th | +0.2pp | 20th | 21% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 13.4% | 25th | +1.0pp | 21st | 79% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 13.7% | 26th | +1.4pp | 22nd | 83% above peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 4.4% | 4th | +0.5pp | 23rd | 42% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 5.8% | 8th | +0.7pp | 24th | 23% below peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 6.6% | 12th | +1.0pp | 25th | 12% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 12.2% | 23rd | +2.3pp | 26th | 63% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 7.5% | 16th | +2.0pp | 27th | on par with peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 7.7% | 19th | +2.9pp | 28th | 3% above peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 5.7% | 7th | +2.1pp | 29th | 24% below peers | ||
| Lakewood, CA | 7.5% | 18th | +3.9pp | 30th | on par with peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 4.7% | 5th | +2.8pp | 31st | 38% below peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers.
Home value rose about 1% over the 12 months ending August 2026, slower than 59% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | $764,158 (Aug 26) | +0.4% | ||||
| United States ref | $368,697 (Aug 26) | +1.2% | ||||
| Arlington Heights, IL | $495,520 (Aug 26) | 11th | +8.9% | 1st | 24% above peers | |
| Evanston, IL | $493,385 (Aug 26) | 12th | +8.5% | 2nd | 23% above peers | |
| New Britain, CT | $312,170 (Aug 26) | 25th | +8.0% | 3rd | 22% below peers | |
| Racine, WI | $222,732 (Aug 26) | 29th | +5.9% | 4th | 44% below peers | |
| Bismarck, ND | $377,821 (Aug 26) | 20th | +5.5% | 5th | 6% below peers | |
| Schaumburg, IL | $360,740 (Aug 26) | 21st | +4.9% | 6th | 10% below peers | |
| Rochester Hills, MI | $469,977 (Aug 26) | 13th | +3.5% | 7th | 17% above peers | |
| Iowa City, IA | $303,890 (Aug 26) | 27th | +3.4% | 8th | 24% below peers | |
| Rogers, AR | $385,478 (Aug 26) | 18th | +3.0% | 9th | 4% below peers | |
| Lakewood, CA | $872,166 (Aug 26) | 4th | +2.6% | 10th | 118% above peers | |
| Noblesville, IN | $392,593 (Aug 26) | 17th | +2.0% | 11th | 2% below peers | |
| Gulfport, MS | $206,071 (Aug 26) | 30th | +2.0% | 12th | 49% below peers | |
| Southfield, MI | $253,902 (Aug 26) | 28th | +1.8% | 13th | 37% below peers | |
| Chino Hills, CA | $972,593 (Aug 26) | 3rd | +1.6% | 14th | 143% above peers | |
| Pawtucket, RI | $400,687 (Aug 26) | 14th | +1.5% | 15th | on par with peers | |
| Blaine, MN | $381,495 (Aug 26) | 19th | +1.2% | 16th | 5% below peers | |
| Caldwell, ID | $399,412 (Aug 26) | 16th | +1.2% | 17th | on par with peers | |
| Alameda, CA | $1,137,620 (Aug 26) | 2nd | +1.2% | 18th | 184% above peers | |
| Ankeny, IA | $338,606 (Aug 26) | 22nd | +0.8% | 19th | 15% below peers | |
| Rocklin, CA | $690,121 (Aug 26) | 6th | +0.3% | 20th | 72% above peers | |
| Tustin, CA | $1,157,866 (Aug 26) | 1st | +0.2% | 21st | 189% above peers | |
| Carmichael, CA | $552,774 (Aug 26) | 10th | +0.1% | 22nd | 38% above peers | |
| Flagstaff, AZ | $656,451 (Aug 26) | 7th | +0.1% | 23rd | 64% above peers | |
| Marysville, WA | $617,386 (Aug 26) | 8th | +0.1% | 24th | 54% above peers | |
| Pittsburg, CA | $558,760 (Aug 26) | 9th | -1.2% | 25th | 40% above peers | |
| Missouri City, TX | $333,316 (Aug 26) | 23rd | -1.6% | 26th | 17% below peers | |
| Rock Hill, SC | $323,886 (Aug 26) | 24th | -1.7% | 27th | 19% below peers | |
| Napa, CA | $862,725 (Aug 26) | 5th | -2.0% | 28th | 115% above peers | |
| Wesley Chapel, FL | $400,424 (Aug 26) | 15th | -2.8% | 29th | on par with peers | |
| San Marcos, TX | $306,851 (Aug 26) | 26th | -3.4% | 30th | 23% below peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers.
Starter homes rose about 1% over the 12 months ending August 2026, slower than 55% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | $467,879 (Aug 26) | -0.0% | ||||
| United States ref | $200,550 (Aug 26) | +2.2% | ||||
| New Britain, CT | $251,266 (Aug 26) | 22nd | +10.1% | 1st | 17% below peers | |
| Racine, WI | $170,112 (Aug 26) | 29th | +8.4% | 2nd | 44% below peers | |
| Evanston, IL | $295,656 (Aug 26) | 17th | +8.4% | 3rd | 2% below peers | |
| Bismarck, ND | $254,390 (Aug 26) | 21st | +6.7% | 4th | 16% below peers | |
| Arlington Heights, IL | $294,956 (Aug 26) | 18th | +6.1% | 5th | 2% below peers | |
| Gulfport, MS | $128,674 (Aug 26) | 30th | +4.1% | 6th | 57% below peers | |
| Schaumburg, IL | $266,017 (Aug 26) | 20th | +4.1% | 7th | 12% below peers | |
| Iowa City, IA | $198,732 (Aug 26) | 27th | +4.0% | 8th | 34% below peers | |
| Rochester Hills, MI | $306,889 (Aug 26) | 14th | +3.2% | 9th | 2% above peers | |
| Lakewood, CA | $787,657 (Aug 26) | 2nd | +3.1% | 10th | 161% above peers | |
| Rogers, AR | $274,329 (Aug 26) | 19th | +2.8% | 11th | 9% below peers | |
| Noblesville, IN | $298,391 (Aug 26) | 16th | +2.3% | 12th | 1% below peers | |
| Caldwell, ID | $336,822 (Aug 26) | 12th | +2.0% | 13th | 11% above peers | |
| Pawtucket, RI | $348,268 (Aug 26) | 11th | +2.0% | 14th | 15% above peers | |
| Blaine, MN | $302,157 (Aug 26) | 15th | +1.7% | 15th | on par with peers | |
| Chino Hills, CA | $741,876 (Aug 26) | 3rd | +1.1% | 16th | 146% above peers | |
| Alameda, CA | $812,803 (Aug 26) | 1st | +0.8% | 17th | 169% above peers | |
| Rocklin, CA | $557,680 (Aug 26) | 6th | +0.5% | 18th | 85% above peers | |
| Flagstaff, AZ | $469,108 (Aug 26) | 8th | +0.4% | 19th | 55% above peers | |
| Marysville, WA | $514,662 (Aug 26) | 7th | +0.3% | 20th | 70% above peers | |
| Ankeny, IA | $241,477 (Aug 26) | 23rd | +0.2% | 21st | 20% below peers | |
| Southfield, MI | $170,307 (Aug 26) | 28th | -0.3% | 22nd | 44% below peers | |
| Carmichael, CA | $417,873 (Aug 26) | 10th | -0.3% | 23rd | 38% above peers | |
| Tustin, CA | $732,842 (Aug 26) | 4th | -0.9% | 24th | 143% above peers | |
| Pittsburg, CA | $454,225 (Aug 26) | 9th | -1.5% | 25th | 50% above peers | |
| Missouri City, TX | $239,572 (Aug 26) | 24th | -1.7% | 26th | 21% below peers | |
| Napa, CA | $644,528 (Aug 26) | 5th | -2.3% | 27th | 113% above peers | |
| Wesley Chapel, FL | $309,038 (Aug 26) | 13th | -2.6% | 28th | 2% above peers | |
| Rock Hill, SC | $211,869 (Aug 26) | 26th | -3.2% | 29th | 30% below peers | |
| San Marcos, TX | $227,729 (Aug 26) | 25th | -3.5% | 30th | 25% below peers |
Beyond the survey margin, but small next to the spread across these peers.
Homeownership rose 2.7 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 48.0% to 50.7% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.3pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 55.9% | +1.0pp | |||||
| United States ref | 65.2% | ||||||
| Racine, WI | 60.2% | 17th | +9.2pp | 1st | 3% below peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 73.0% | 6th | +9.7pp | 2nd | 17% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 62.3% | 16th | +8.0pp | 3rd | on par with peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 45.0% | 29th | +5.0pp | 4th | 28% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 53.4% | 23rd | +5.6pp | 5th | 14% below peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 50.1% | 26th | +5.0pp | 6th | 20% below peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 55.1% | 21st | +5.1pp | 7th | 12% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 50.7% | 25th | +2.7pp | 8th | 19% below peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 77.1% | 3rd | +3.1pp | 9th | 24% above peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 30.8% | 31st | +1.1pp | 10th | 51% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 71.1% | 10th | +2.6pp | 11th | 14% above peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 65.5% | 14th | +2.2pp | 12th | 5% above peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 69.4% | 11th | +2.2pp | 13th | 11% above peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 54.2% | 22nd | +1.7pp | 14th | 13% below peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 68.3% | 13th | +1.2pp | 15th | 10% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 56.2% | 20th | +0.4pp | 16th | 10% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 58.7% | 18th | +0.4pp | 17th | 6% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 81.8% | 2nd | +0.3pp | 18th | 31% above peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 71.2% | 9th | -0.0pp | 19th | 14% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 76.7% | 4th | -0.4pp | 20th | 23% above peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 57.2% | 19th | -0.4pp | 21st | 8% below peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 74.0% | 5th | -0.6pp | 22nd | 19% above peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 47.2% | 28th | -0.5pp | 23rd | 24% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 63.0% | 15th | -0.8pp | 24th | 1% above peers | ||
| Lakewood, CA | 71.4% | 7th | -0.9pp | 25th | 15% above peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 85.3% | 1st | -1.1pp | 26th | 37% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 48.8% | 27th | -0.9pp | 27th | 22% below peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 71.3% | 8th | -2.4pp | 28th | 14% above peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 52.2% | 24th | -1.9pp | 29th | 16% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 69.2% | 12th | -5.8pp | 30th | 11% above peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 42.3% | 30th | -5.1pp | 31st | 32% below peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers. Alameda is rising faster than most of the selected peers.
Rent rose about 6% over the 12 months ending August 2026, faster than 93% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States ref | $1,948 (Aug 26) | +2.5% | ||||
| Iowa City, IA | $1,270 (Aug 26) | 29th | +8.8% | 1st | 36% below peers | |
| Lakewood, CA | $3,602 (Aug 26) | 1st | +8.0% | 2nd | 81% above peers | |
| Alameda, CA | $2,953 (Aug 26) | 4th | +6.2% | 3rd | 49% above peers | |
| New Britain, CT | $1,623 (Aug 26) | 21st | +5.2% | 4th | 18% below peers | |
| Pawtucket, RI | $1,876 (Aug 26) | 16th | +5.1% | 5th | 5% below peers | |
| Noblesville, IN | $1,741 (Aug 26) | 19th | +4.6% | 6th | 12% below peers | |
| Racine, WI | $1,242 (Aug 26) | 30th | +4.3% | 7th | 37% below peers | |
| Evanston, IL | $2,438 (Aug 26) | 9th | +4.3% | 8th | 23% above peers | |
| Caldwell, ID | $1,695 (Aug 26) | 20th | +4.1% | 9th | 15% below peers | |
| Bismarck, ND | $1,306 (Aug 26) | 28th | +3.4% | 10th | 34% below peers | |
| Rocklin, CA | $2,478 (Aug 26) | 7th | +3.1% | 11th | 25% above peers | |
| Pittsburg, CA | $2,453 (Aug 26) | 8th | +3.1% | 12th | 24% above peers | |
| Southfield, MI | $1,584 (Aug 26) | 22nd | +3.0% | 13th | 20% below peers | |
| Schaumburg, IL | $2,147 (Aug 26) | 12th | +2.9% | 14th | 8% above peers | |
| Carmichael, CA | $1,741 (Aug 26) | 18th | +2.1% | 15th | 12% below peers | |
| Blaine, MN | $2,078 (Aug 26) | 14th | +1.9% | 16th | 5% above peers | |
| Marysville, WA | $2,554 (Aug 26) | 6th | +1.8% | 17th | 29% above peers | |
| Gulfport, MS | $1,483 (Aug 26) | 26th | +1.6% | 18th | 25% below peers | |
| Ankeny, IA | $1,526 (Aug 26) | 23rd | +1.4% | 19th | 23% below peers | |
| Tustin, CA | $3,152 (Aug 26) | 2nd | +1.3% | 20th | 59% above peers | |
| Rogers, AR | $1,513 (Aug 26) | 24th | +1.3% | 21st | 24% below peers | |
| Arlington Heights, IL | $1,985 (Aug 26) | 15th | +1.3% | 22nd | on par with peers | |
| Rock Hill, SC | $1,488 (Aug 26) | 25th | +1.2% | 23rd | 25% below peers | |
| Rochester Hills, MI | $1,812 (Aug 26) | 17th | +1.1% | 24th | 9% below peers | |
| Chino Hills, CA | $3,011 (Aug 26) | 3rd | +0.9% | 25th | 52% above peers | |
| Napa, CA | $2,863 (Aug 26) | 5th | +0.5% | 26th | 44% above peers | |
| San Marcos, TX | $1,428 (Aug 26) | 27th | +0.0% | 27th | 28% below peers | |
| Wesley Chapel, FL | $2,220 (Aug 26) | 10th | -0.1% | 28th | 12% above peers | |
| Missouri City, TX | $2,117 (Aug 26) | 13th | -0.3% | 29th | 7% above peers | |
| Flagstaff, AZ | $2,166 (Aug 26) | 11th | -0.8% | 30th | 9% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Cost burden changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (36.3% then, 37.1% now; margin ±3.5pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 41.7% | +0.0pp | |||||
| United States ref | 32.2% | +0.4pp | |||||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 21.4% | 1st | -2.2pp | 1st | 41% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 35.6% | 14th | -3.6pp | 2nd | 1% below peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 25.8% | 7th | -2.4pp | 3rd | 28% below peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 37.9% | 21st | -3.3pp | 4th | 5% above peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 23.5% | 5th | -1.3pp | 5th | 35% below peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 38.5% | 22nd | -1.5pp | 6th | 7% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 43.5% | 28th | -1.4pp | 7th | 21% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 43.8% | 29th | -1.3pp | 8th | 22% above peers | ||
| Lakewood, CA | 35.2% | 13th | -0.9pp | 9th | 2% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 36.8% | 18th | -0.7pp | 10th | 2% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 37.2% | 20th | -0.3pp | 11th | 3% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 40.0% | 24th | +0.0pp | 12th | 11% above peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 36.0% | 16th | +0.1pp | 13th | on par with peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 25.6% | 6th | +0.2pp | 14th | 29% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 37.1% | 19th | +0.8pp | 15th | 3% above peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 32.0% | 11th | +0.7pp | 16th | 11% below peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 35.6% | 15th | +0.9pp | 17th | 1% below peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 44.4% | 30th | +1.1pp | 18th | 23% above peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 23.1% | 3rd | +0.7pp | 19th | 36% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 29.2% | 9th | +1.3pp | 20th | 19% below peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 42.2% | 26th | +1.9pp | 21st | 17% above peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 28.7% | 8th | +1.4pp | 22nd | 20% below peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 23.4% | 4th | +1.2pp | 23rd | 35% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 39.5% | 23rd | +2.1pp | 24th | 10% above peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 52.7% | 31st | +2.9pp | 25th | 46% above peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 42.7% | 27th | +3.1pp | 26th | 19% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 41.8% | 25th | +3.3pp | 27th | 16% above peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 35.0% | 12th | +2.9pp | 28th | 3% below peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 30.1% | 10th | +3.0pp | 29th | 16% below peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 22.8% | 2nd | +2.5pp | 30th | 37% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 36.8% | 17th | +10.8pp | 31st | 2% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
No vehicle changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (8.1% then, 8.1% now; margin ±1.8pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 7.1% | -0.0pp | |||||
| United States ref | 8.3% | -0.3pp | |||||
| Racine, WI | 7.7% | 22nd | -5.4pp | 1st | 37% above peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 2.4% | 3rd | -1.1pp | 2nd | 58% below peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 3.6% | 8th | -1.3pp | 3rd | 36% below peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 3.3% | 7th | -0.9pp | 4th | 40% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 8.4% | 25th | -1.6pp | 5th | 51% above peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 5.3% | 14th | -0.8pp | 6th | 4% below peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 8.6% | 26th | -1.1pp | 7th | 54% above peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 3.7% | 9th | -0.4pp | 8th | 33% below peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 4.7% | 12th | -0.5pp | 9th | 16% below peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 15.3% | 30th | -1.2pp | 10th | 174% above peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 12.7% | 29th | -0.8pp | 11th | 127% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 5.4% | 15th | -0.1pp | 12th | 4% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 5.1% | 13th | -0.0pp | 13th | 8% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 8.1% | 23rd | -0.0pp | 14th | 44% above peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 6.9% | 18th | -0.0pp | 15th | 24% above peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 1.8% | 1st | +0.0pp | 16th | 67% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 10.0% | 27th | +0.2pp | 17th | 79% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 2.5% | 5th | +0.0pp | 18th | 55% below peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 4.3% | 11th | +0.1pp | 19th | 23% below peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 2.0% | 2nd | +0.0pp | 20th | 64% below peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 11.0% | 28th | +0.3pp | 21st | 97% above peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 7.1% | 20th | +0.2pp | 22nd | 28% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 17.3% | 31st | +0.8pp | 23rd | 209% above peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 7.2% | 21st | +1.0pp | 24th | 30% above peers | ||
| Lakewood, CA | 4.3% | 10th | +0.6pp | 25th | 23% below peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 7.1% | 19th | +1.2pp | 26th | 27% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 2.6% | 6th | +0.5pp | 27th | 54% below peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 8.1% | 24th | +1.8pp | 28th | 46% above peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 5.6% | 16th | +1.6pp | 29th | on par with peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 2.5% | 4th | +0.9pp | 30th | 56% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 6.4% | 17th | +2.5pp | 31st | 15% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Uninsured fell 1.1 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 3.1% to 2.0% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.6pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 6.6% | -0.9pp | |||||
| United States ref | 8.4% | -0.4pp | |||||
| Rocklin, CA | 2.6% | 2nd | -1.6pp | 1st | 51% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 4.1% | 8th | -2.3pp | 2nd | 21% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 2.0% | 1st | -1.1pp | 3rd | 62% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 2.7% | 3rd | -1.4pp | 4th | 48% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 3.9% | 7th | -1.5pp | 5th | 26% below peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 4.7% | 11th | -1.5pp | 6th | 9% below peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 4.5% | 10th | -1.3pp | 7th | 14% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 5.2% | 15th | -0.9pp | 8th | on par with peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 15.6% | 30th | -2.5pp | 9th | 200% above peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 5.2% | 16th | -0.7pp | 10th | on par with peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 6.2% | 18th | -0.8pp | 11th | 20% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 7.1% | 22nd | -0.8pp | 12th | 37% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 6.5% | 20th | -0.7pp | 13th | 25% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 4.3% | 9th | -0.5pp | 14th | 18% below peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 9.1% | 25th | -0.9pp | 15th | 74% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 7.1% | 23rd | -0.5pp | 16th | 38% above peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 3.6% | 5th | -0.1pp | 17th | 30% below peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 2.9% | 4th | +0.0pp | 18th | 45% below peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 13.0% | 28th | +0.2pp | 19th | 151% above peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 16.4% | 31st | +0.4pp | 20th | 216% above peers | ||
| Lakewood, CA | 4.8% | 12th | +0.1pp | 21st | 7% below peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 14.8% | 29th | +0.7pp | 22nd | 185% above peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 10.5% | 26th | +0.9pp | 23rd | 102% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 5.0% | 14th | +0.4pp | 24th | 4% below peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 3.7% | 6th | +0.3pp | 25th | 29% below peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 4.8% | 13th | +0.5pp | 26th | 7% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 8.2% | 24th | +1.0pp | 27th | 59% above peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 6.2% | 17th | +1.0pp | 28th | 18% above peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 6.4% | 19th | +1.4pp | 29th | 23% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 11.8% | 27th | +2.5pp | 30th | 127% above peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 7.1% | 21st | +1.7pp | 31st | 37% above peers |
Modeled estimate with no usable trend; the level is shown and no trend claims are made.
Adult obesity is about half the peer median.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 28.4% | |||
| United States ref | 33.4% | |||
| Alameda, CA | 18.2% | 1st | 45% below peers | |
| Rocklin, CA | 24.1% | 2nd | 27% below peers | |
| Lakewood, CA | 24.3% | 3rd | 26% below peers | |
| Tustin, CA | 25.3% | 4th | 23% below peers | |
| Chino Hills, CA | 25.7% | 5th | 22% below peers | |
| Schaumburg, IL | 26.3% | 6th | 20% below peers | |
| Rochester Hills, MI | 26.4% | 7th | 20% below peers | |
| Flagstaff, AZ | 26.5% | 8th | 19% below peers | |
| Arlington Heights, IL | 27.2% | 9th | 17% below peers | |
| Napa, CA | 29.5% | 10th | 10% below peers | |
| Evanston, IL | 29.8% | 11th | 9% below peers | |
| Noblesville, IN | 30.8% | 12th | 6% below peers | |
| Pittsburg, CA | 31.7% | 13th | 3% below peers | |
| Iowa City, IA | 32.4% | 14th | 1% below peers | |
| Cheektowaga, NY | 32.6% | 15th | 1% below peers | |
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 32.8% | 16th | on par with peers | |
| Carmichael, CA | 34.4% | 17th | 5% above peers | |
| Marysville, WA | 34.7% | 18th | 6% above peers | |
| Pawtucket, RI | 34.8% | 19th | 6% above peers | |
| Ankeny, IA | 34.8% | 20th | 6% above peers | |
| Rock Hill, SC | 35.3% | 21st | 8% above peers | |
| Missouri City, TX | 35.4% | 22nd | 8% above peers | |
| Blaine, MN | 35.9% | 23rd | 9% above peers | |
| Rogers, AR | 36.8% | 24th | 12% above peers | |
| Gulfport, MS | 37.4% | 25th | 14% above peers | |
| San Marcos, TX | 37.6% | 26th | 15% above peers | |
| New Britain, CT | 38.3% | 27th | 17% above peers | |
| Southfield, MI | 38.8% | 28th | 18% above peers | |
| Caldwell, ID | 39.0% | 29th | 19% above peers | |
| Bismarck, ND | 39.5% | 30th | 20% above peers | |
| Racine, WI | 42.9% | 31st | 31% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is within the margin, but each of the last 3 annual releases moved the 5-year average the same way. Direction is a reliable early signal; its size is not.
Child uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (1.9% then, 1.4% now; margin ±1.0pp). The newest releases lean downward: each of the last 3 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 3.2% | -0.0pp | |||||
| United States ref | 5.5% | +0.4pp | |||||
| Southfield, MI | 0.3% | 1st | -2.9pp | 1st | 89% below peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 1.2% | 3rd | -2.7pp | 2nd | 60% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 1.8% | 8th | -3.2pp | 3rd | 43% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 1.4% | 5th | -2.5pp | 4th | 54% below peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 1.5% | 6th | -1.6pp | 5th | 50% below peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 3.2% | 17th | -3.3pp | 6th | 5% above peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 1.1% | 2nd | -1.0pp | 7th | 66% below peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 1.6% | 7th | -1.2pp | 8th | 48% below peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 1.9% | 9th | -0.9pp | 9th | 39% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 1.4% | 4th | -0.5pp | 10th | 55% below peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 4.2% | 23rd | -0.6pp | 11th | 37% above peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 3.2% | 18th | -0.2pp | 12th | 6% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 6.1% | 26th | +0.2pp | 13th | 100% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 4.4% | 24th | +0.2pp | 14th | 42% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 2.7% | 13th | +0.2pp | 15th | 11% below peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 8.0% | 28th | +0.6pp | 16th | 160% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 2.4% | 11th | +0.2pp | 17th | 21% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 2.9% | 14th | +0.3pp | 18th | 6% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 4.5% | 25th | +0.5pp | 19th | 45% above peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 8.3% | 29th | +1.2pp | 20th | 170% above peers | ||
| Lakewood, CA | 2.6% | 12th | +0.4pp | 21st | 17% below peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 8.8% | 30th | +1.5pp | 22nd | 185% above peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 3.4% | 19th | +0.6pp | 23rd | 12% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 2.9% | 15th | +0.7pp | 24th | 4% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 7.5% | 27th | +1.9pp | 25th | 143% above peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 3.5% | 20th | +0.9pp | 26th | 13% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 3.7% | 22nd | +1.3pp | 27th | 21% above peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 3.1% | 16th | +1.3pp | 28th | on par with peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 3.5% | 21st | +2.2pp | 29th | 15% above peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 13.3% | 31st | +9.3pp | 30th | 334% above peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 1.9% | 10th | +1.4pp | 31st | 37% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
College attainment rose 6.9 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 54.7% to 61.5% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.9pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 37.1% | +3.1pp | |||||
| United States ref | 35.7% | +3.5pp | |||||
| Caldwell, ID | 19.5% | 31st | +5.9pp | 1st | 50% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 21.4% | 29th | +4.8pp | 2nd | 45% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 29.6% | 24th | +6.0pp | 3rd | 25% below peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 24.3% | 25th | +3.8pp | 4th | 38% below peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 35.1% | 21st | +4.8pp | 5th | 10% below peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 47.8% | 12th | +6.2pp | 6th | 22% above peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 38.3% | 17th | +4.9pp | 7th | 2% below peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 34.4% | 22nd | +4.0pp | 8th | 12% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 61.5% | 2nd | +6.9pp | 9th | 57% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 23.6% | 26th | +2.5pp | 10th | 40% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 38.2% | 18th | +4.0pp | 11th | 3% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 52.3% | 6th | +5.2pp | 12th | 33% above peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 39.2% | 16th | +3.5pp | 13th | on par with peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 36.7% | 20th | +3.2pp | 14th | 6% below peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 51.6% | 8th | +4.2pp | 15th | 32% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 47.4% | 13th | +3.6pp | 16th | 21% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 40.7% | 15th | +2.9pp | 17th | 4% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 61.4% | 3rd | +4.0pp | 18th | 56% above peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 23.6% | 27th | +1.4pp | 19th | 40% below peers | ||
| Lakewood, CA | 32.6% | 23rd | +1.8pp | 20th | 17% below peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 36.9% | 19th | +2.0pp | 21st | 6% below peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 60.4% | 5th | +2.5pp | 22nd | 54% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 69.5% | 1st | +2.4pp | 23rd | 77% above peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 48.0% | 11th | +1.6pp | 24th | 22% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 48.1% | 10th | +1.4pp | 25th | 23% above peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 52.1% | 7th | +1.3pp | 26th | 33% above peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 60.5% | 4th | +1.4pp | 27th | 54% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 50.4% | 9th | +1.0pp | 28th | 29% above peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 22.2% | 28th | +0.4pp | 29th | 43% below peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 19.6% | 30th | -0.2pp | 30th | 50% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 41.8% | 14th | -1.9pp | 31st | 7% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Preschool enrollment changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (65.7% then, 69.8% now; margin ±13.5pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 44.5% | -5.1pp | |||||
| United States ref | 45.5% | ||||||
| Bismarck, ND | 38.1% | 23rd | +7.0pp | 1st | 13% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 49.3% | 7th | +7.0pp | 2nd | 12% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 45.4% | 14th | +6.0pp | 3rd | 3% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 54.7% | 5th | +6.5pp | 4th | 25% above peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 42.5% | 18th | +4.2pp | 5th | 3% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 69.8% | 1st | +4.1pp | 6th | 59% above peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 46.5% | 10th | +2.2pp | 7th | 6% above peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 66.4% | 2nd | +0.9pp | 8th | 51% above peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 36.8% | 25th | +0.4pp | 9th | 16% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 39.6% | 21st | -0.4pp | 10th | 10% below peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 64.5% | 3rd | -0.8pp | 11th | 47% above peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 46.3% | 11th | -0.6pp | 12th | 5% above peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 48.4% | 8th | -1.9pp | 13th | 10% above peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 47.5% | 9th | -2.0pp | 14th | 8% above peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 26.2% | 31st | -2.5pp | 15th | 40% below peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 43.9% | 17th | -6.0pp | 16th | on par with peers | ||
| Lakewood, CA | 45.4% | 13th | -6.2pp | 17th | 3% above peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 45.6% | 12th | -7.6pp | 18th | 4% above peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 34.6% | 26th | -5.9pp | 19th | 21% below peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 38.2% | 22nd | -6.8pp | 20th | 13% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 39.8% | 20th | -7.2pp | 21st | 9% below peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 43.9% | 16th | -8.0pp | 22nd | on par with peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 51.5% | 6th | -12.5pp | 23rd | 17% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 45.2% | 15th | -11.8pp | 24th | 3% above peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 37.2% | 24th | -10.9pp | 25th | 15% below peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 33.1% | 28th | -10.1pp | 26th | 25% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 55.2% | 4th | -17.1pp | 27th | 26% above peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 28.6% | 29th | -11.7pp | 28th | 35% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 33.5% | 27th | -17.2pp | 29th | 24% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 41.9% | 19th | -22.6pp | 30th | 5% below peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 27.9% | 30th | -16.7pp | 31st | 37% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed. Margins at this size are wide (low-reliability estimate); read the level, not the pace.
Disconnected youth changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (1.3% then, 3.2% now; margin ±4.5pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 6.7% | +0.2pp | |||||
| United States ref | 6.9% | +0.3pp | |||||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 1.1% | 2nd | -2.4pp | 1st | 75% below peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 1.8% | 3rd | -2.8pp | 2nd | 60% below peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 3.8% | 11th | -3.5pp | 3rd | 16% below peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 4.2% | 14th | -3.9pp | 4th | 6% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 6.0% | 19th | -4.9pp | 5th | 33% above peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 7.3% | 21st | -5.8pp | 6th | 63% above peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 4.4% | 15th | -1.8pp | 7th | 2% below peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 3.4% | 9th | -1.1pp | 8th | 25% below peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 10.5% | 30th | -2.4pp | 9th | 135% above peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 5.6% | 18th | -1.0pp | 10th | 25% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 8.2% | 25th | -1.3pp | 11th | 82% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 4.2% | 13th | -0.6pp | 12th | 6% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 3.6% | 10th | -0.2pp | 13th | 19% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 0.9% | 1st | -0.0pp | 14th | 79% below peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 8.9% | 27th | -0.3pp | 15th | 100% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 2.5% | 5th | +0.1pp | 16th | 43% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 11.5% | 31st | +1.0pp | 17th | 158% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 3.0% | 7th | +0.3pp | 18th | 32% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 3.9% | 12th | +0.6pp | 19th | 13% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 7.5% | 23rd | +1.2pp | 20th | 69% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 8.0% | 24th | +2.3pp | 21st | 78% above peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 2.8% | 6th | +0.9pp | 22nd | 37% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 7.3% | 22nd | +2.5pp | 23rd | 63% above peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 4.5% | 16th | +2.0pp | 24th | on par with peers | ||
| Lakewood, CA | 6.8% | 20th | +3.5pp | 25th | 52% above peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 3.2% | 8th | +1.9pp | 26th | 29% below peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 2.0% | 4th | +1.2pp | 27th | 56% below peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 10.2% | 29th | +6.1pp | 28th | 129% above peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 8.9% | 26th | +5.7pp | 29th | 99% above peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 9.0% | 28th | +7.1pp | 30th | 101% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 5.3% | 17th | +4.4pp | 31st | 19% above peers |
A real change beyond the survey margin; neither direction is inherently better for this metric.
Population fell about 2% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 78,522 to 77,238 - more than the combined survey margin (±70). That reverses the previous span, which went up between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 76,011 | 16th | +31% | 1st | on par with peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 66,516 | 31st | +21% | 2nd | 12% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 76,948 | 8th | +19% | 3rd | 1% above peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 72,615 | 28th | +17% | 4th | 4% below peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 73,362 | 23rd | +16% | 5th | 3% below peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 73,327 | 24th | +13% | 6th | 4% below peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 72,488 | 29th | +13% | 7th | 5% below peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 70,897 | 30th | +12% | 8th | 7% below peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 72,981 | 27th | +10% | 9th | 4% below peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 76,257 | 13th | +7% | 10th | on par with peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 73,002 | 26th | +6% | 11th | 4% below peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 75,893 | 18th | +6% | 12th | on par with peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 76,445 | 11th | +6% | 13th | 1% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 76,236 | 14th | +4% | 14th | on par with peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 77,089 | 7th | +4% | 15th | 1% above peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 75,556 | 20th | +4% | 16th | 1% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 76,868 | 9th | +4% | 17th | 1% above peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 76,056 | 15th | +3% | 18th | on par with peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 76,558 | 10th | +3% | 19th | 1% above peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 75,259 | 21st | +3% | 20th | 1% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 76,340 | 12th | +2% | 21st | on par with peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 74,223 | 22nd | +2% | 22nd | 2% below peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 73,003 | 25th | +2% | 23rd | 4% below peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 75,752 | 19th | +1% | 24th | on par with peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 77,633 | 5th | +1% | 25th | 2% above peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 76,005 | 17th | +1% | 26th | on par with peers | ||
| Lakewood, CA | 79,850 | 1st | -1% | 27th | 5% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 78,239 | 3rd | -1% | 28th | 3% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 78,981 | 2nd | -1% | 29th | 4% above peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 77,238 | 6th | -2% | 30th | 2% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 77,927 | 4th | -3% | 31st | 3% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Single-parent changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (19.2% then, 22.4% now; margin ±5.1pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 28.5% | +0.7pp | |||||
| United States ref | 29.9% | -0.2pp | |||||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 15.3% | 28th | +4.7pp | 1st | 40% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 36.5% | 7th | +9.6pp | 2nd | 42% above peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 21.7% | 24th | +5.0pp | 3rd | 15% below peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 14.2% | 29th | +3.2pp | 4th | 45% below peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 22.6% | 21st | +3.5pp | 5th | 12% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 22.4% | 22nd | +3.2pp | 6th | 13% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 34.8% | 8th | +4.9pp | 7th | 36% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 29.1% | 11th | +3.6pp | 8th | 13% above peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 24.1% | 19th | +2.8pp | 9th | 6% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 26.4% | 13th | +2.9pp | 10th | 3% above peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 28.5% | 12th | +2.6pp | 11th | 11% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 25.6% | 16th | +1.6pp | 12th | on par with peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 25.9% | 15th | +1.4pp | 13th | 1% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 20.2% | 25th | +1.0pp | 14th | 21% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 57.1% | 1st | +0.7pp | 15th | 123% above peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 23.4% | 20th | +0.3pp | 16th | 9% below peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 13.7% | 31st | +0.1pp | 17th | 47% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 13.7% | 30th | -0.7pp | 18th | 46% below peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 46.3% | 4th | -3.5pp | 19th | 80% above peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 56.3% | 2nd | -4.4pp | 20th | 120% above peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 40.2% | 6th | -3.3pp | 21st | 57% above peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 22.3% | 23rd | -2.0pp | 22nd | 13% below peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 53.1% | 3rd | -5.6pp | 23rd | 107% above peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 40.2% | 5th | -4.9pp | 24th | 57% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 24.8% | 17th | -3.6pp | 25th | 3% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 34.5% | 9th | -6.6pp | 26th | 34% above peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 32.4% | 10th | -7.6pp | 27th | 26% above peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 18.0% | 26th | -4.2pp | 28th | 30% below peers | ||
| Lakewood, CA | 17.9% | 27th | -4.3pp | 29th | 30% below peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 24.2% | 18th | -7.8pp | 30th | 6% below peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 26.1% | 14th | -9.4pp | 31st | 2% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Working parents changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (73.9% then, 80.9% now; margin ±9.0pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 66.5% | +3.8pp | |||||
| United States ref | 68.1% | +1.9pp | |||||
| Schaumburg, IL | 66.0% | 26th | +10.7pp | 1st | 8% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 77.6% | 5th | +12.6pp | 2nd | 9% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 68.4% | 23rd | +11.0pp | 3rd | 4% below peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 69.2% | 21st | +9.3pp | 4th | 3% below peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 77.5% | 6th | +10.1pp | 5th | 8% above peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 78.3% | 4th | +9.5pp | 6th | 10% above peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 64.8% | 28th | +6.1pp | 7th | 9% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 80.9% | 2nd | +7.0pp | 8th | 13% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 72.3% | 14th | +6.0pp | 9th | 1% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 66.0% | 25th | +5.5pp | 10th | 8% below peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 72.6% | 13th | +5.2pp | 11th | 2% above peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 71.5% | 16th | +5.1pp | 12th | on par with peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 84.0% | 1st | +5.2pp | 13th | 17% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 68.0% | 24th | +3.8pp | 14th | 5% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 75.8% | 8th | +3.2pp | 15th | 6% above peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 80.6% | 3rd | +3.2pp | 16th | 13% above peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 68.9% | 22nd | +2.2pp | 17th | 4% below peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 75.5% | 9th | +2.2pp | 18th | 6% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 74.2% | 10th | +2.1pp | 19th | 4% above peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 65.8% | 27th | +1.3pp | 20th | 8% below peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 77.4% | 7th | +0.7pp | 21st | 8% above peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 63.2% | 29th | +0.3pp | 22nd | 12% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 70.4% | 17th | -0.7pp | 23rd | 2% below peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 57.2% | 31st | -0.8pp | 24th | 20% below peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 69.5% | 20th | -1.6pp | 25th | 3% below peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 71.6% | 15th | -1.9pp | 26th | on par with peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 70.3% | 18th | -3.8pp | 27th | 2% below peers | ||
| Lakewood, CA | 74.1% | 11th | -4.3pp | 28th | 4% above peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 59.4% | 30th | -6.3pp | 29th | 17% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 70.3% | 19th | -8.4pp | 30th | 2% below peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 74.1% | 12th | -10.8pp | 31st | 4% above peers |