The last 12 months moved in the better direction. The multi-year trend has not (yet) passed the checks below, so no sustained-improvement claim is made. Most of the selected peers are improving faster than Rocklin.
Violent crime fell about 4% over the 12 months ending July 2026, slower than 73% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 456 (Apr 26) | -9.3% | |||
| Bismarck, ND | 250 (Jul 26) | -42.0% | 1st | ||
| Tustin, CA | 191 (Jul 26) | -26.2% | 2nd | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 38 (Jul 26) | -23.7% | 3rd | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 368 (Jul 26) | -23.2% | 4th | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 59 (Jul 26) | -22.4% | 5th | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 57 (Jul 26) | -18.5% | 6th | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 378 (Jun 26) | -17.8% | 7th | ||
| Blaine, MN | 74 (Jul 26) | -16.2% | 8th | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 128 (Jul 26) | -16.1% | 9th | ||
| Hammond, IN | 585 (Feb 26) | -13.0% | 10th | ||
| New Britain, CT | 366 (Jul 26) | -12.5% | 11th | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 218 (Jul 26) | -12.5% | 12th | ||
| Napa, CA | 212 (Jul 26) | -11.0% | 13th | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 272 (Jul 26) | -7.2% | 14th | ||
| Alameda, CA | 329 (Jul 26) | -5.2% | 15th | ||
| Southfield, MI | 501 (Jul 25) | -4.6% | 16th | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 120 (Jul 26) | -4.2% | 17th | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 365 (Jul 26) | +0.4% | 18th | ||
| Evanston, IL | 131 (Jun 26) | +5.3% | 19th | ||
| Racine, WI | 408 (Apr 26) | +6.4% | 20th | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 505 (Jan 26) | +7.2% | 21st | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 69 (Jul 26) | +12.8% | 22nd | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 170 (Jul 26) | +15.8% | 23rd |
The most recent 12 months moved against the better direction, whatever the longer window shows. The checks below judge the multi-year window. Rocklin is also worsening faster than most of the selected peers.
Property crime rose about 6% over the 12 months ending July 2026, faster than 91% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 1,987 (Apr 26) | -12.2% | |||
| Bismarck, ND | 1,692 (Jul 26) | -49.5% | 1st | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 483 (Jul 26) | -40.6% | 2nd | ||
| Tustin, CA | 1,504 (Jul 26) | -33.7% | 3rd | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 469 (Jul 26) | -28.6% | 4th | ||
| Napa, CA | 1,044 (Jul 26) | -24.1% | 5th | ||
| Evanston, IL | 1,969 (Jun 26) | -23.3% | 6th | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 430 (Jul 26) | -19.7% | 7th | ||
| Hammond, IN | 2,400 (Feb 26) | -17.9% | 8th | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 1,644 (Jul 26) | -15.9% | 9th | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 931 (Jul 26) | -13.7% | 10th | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 1,222 (Jul 26) | -12.1% | 11th | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 1,520 (Jul 26) | -11.9% | 12th | ||
| Southfield, MI | 2,247 (Jul 26) | -10.4% | 13th | ||
| Blaine, MN | 1,029 (Jul 26) | -8.3% | 14th | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 1,768 (Jul 26) | -7.5% | 15th | ||
| New Britain, CT | 1,772 (Jul 26) | -5.7% | 16th | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 2,134 (Jan 26) | -3.5% | 17th | ||
| Alameda, CA | 3,616 (Jul 26) | -3.5% | 18th | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 2,295 (Jun 26) | -0.2% | 19th | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 1,084 (Jul 26) | +2.6% | 20th | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 844 (Jul 26) | +6.1% | 21st | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 880 (Jul 26) | +11.6% | 22nd | ||
| Racine, WI | 1,658 (Jul 26) | +36.7% | 23rd |
This badge answers one question: can Rocklin's own trend be trusted as a real improvement? The trend is moving the right way, but at least one check failed, so not yet. Rocklin is also improving faster than most of the selected peers.
Homicide fell about 20% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 86% of similar-size cities. The change does not yet pass the noise and consistency checks, so treat it as a raw signal.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 6 (Apr 26) | -17.8% | |||
| Blaine, MN | 0 (Jul 26) | -100.0% | 1st | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 0 (Jul 26) | -100.0% | 2nd | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 1 (Jul 26) | -75.0% | 3rd | ||
| Napa, CA | 1 (Jul 26) | -74.9% | 4th | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 1 (Jul 26) | -66.8% | 5th | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 3 (Jan 26) | -50.0% | 6th | ||
| Racine, WI | 3 (Jul 26) | -49.9% | 7th | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 8 (Jun 26) | -14.3% | 8th | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 4 (Jul 26) | +0.0% | 9th | ||
| New Britain, CT | 3 (Jul 26) | +0.0% | 10th | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 1 (Jul 26) | +0.0% | 11th | ||
| Tustin, CA | 4 (Jul 26) | +0.0% | 12th | ||
| Hammond, IN | 15 (Feb 26) | +10.2% | 13th | ||
| Southfield, MI | 8 (Jul 26) | +199.6% | 14th | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 4 (Jul 26) | +200.8% | 15th | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 0 (Jul 26) | ||||
| Alameda, CA | 0 (Jul 26) | ||||
| Caldwell, ID | 1 (Jul 26) | ||||
| Evanston, IL | 0 (Jun 26) | ||||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 1 (Jul 26) | ||||
| Noblesville, IN | 0 (Jul 26) | ||||
| Ankeny, IA | 3 (Jul 26) | ||||
| Bismarck, ND | 4 (Jul 26) |
This badge answers one question: can Rocklin's own trend be trusted as a real improvement? The trend passed all three checks, so yes. The most recent 12 months agree with the multi-year trend. Most of the selected peers are improving faster than Rocklin.
Vehicle theft fell about 3% over the 12 months ending July 2026, slower than 77% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 303 (Apr 26) | -22.2% | |||
| Bismarck, ND | 141 (Jul 26) | -54.4% | 1st | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 52 (Jul 26) | -52.9% | 2nd | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 39 (Jul 26) | -50.8% | 3rd | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 49 (Jul 26) | -47.9% | 4th | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 38 (Jul 26) | -43.1% | 5th | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 34 (Jul 26) | -40.9% | 6th | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 71 (Jul 26) | -34.5% | 7th | ||
| Napa, CA | 88 (Jul 26) | -29.5% | 8th | ||
| Tustin, CA | 125 (Jul 26) | -29.2% | 9th | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 102 (Jan 26) | -28.8% | 10th | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 109 (Jul 26) | -20.2% | 11th | ||
| Evanston, IL | 140 (Jun 26) | -20.1% | 12th | ||
| Southfield, MI | 426 (Jul 26) | -16.5% | 13th | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 224 (Jul 26) | -13.9% | 14th | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 209 (Jun 26) | -13.6% | 15th | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 193 (Jul 26) | -9.7% | 16th | ||
| Alameda, CA | 643 (Jul 26) | -6.1% | 17th | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 46 (Jul 26) | -2.8% | 18th | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 43 (Jul 26) | +6.5% | 19th | ||
| Blaine, MN | 69 (Jul 26) | +10.4% | 20th | ||
| New Britain, CT | 501 (Jul 26) | +16.5% | 21st | ||
| Racine, WI | 252 (Jul 26) | +20.2% | 22nd | ||
| Hammond, IN | 417 (Feb 26) | +20.8% | 23rd |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Household income rose about 26% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from $98,566 to $124,168 (each survey's own dollars, not adjusted for inflation) - more than the combined survey margin (±$5,981).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | $99,122 | +32% | |||||
| United States ref | $80,734 | +28% | |||||
| Caldwell, ID | $73,058 | 20th | +49% | 1st | 23% below peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | $86,728 | 17th | +41% | 2nd | 8% below peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | $68,771 | 22nd | +36% | 3rd | 27% below peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | $68,310 | 24th | +35% | 4th | 28% below peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | $99,861 | 13th | +34% | 5th | 6% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | $112,503 | 6th | +33% | 6th | 19% above peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | $85,914 | 18th | +33% | 7th | 9% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | $137,697 | 1st | +31% | 8th | 46% above peers | ||
| Racine, WI | $57,740 | 28th | +31% | 9th | 39% below peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | $103,974 | 12th | +29% | 10th | 10% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | $120,694 | 4th | +28% | 11th | 28% above peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | $49,919 | 31st | +27% | 12th | 47% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | $68,613 | 23rd | +27% | 13th | 27% below peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | $51,281 | 30th | +27% | 14th | 46% below peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | $104,047 | 11th | +27% | 15th | 10% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | $107,504 | 8th | +27% | 16th | 14% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | $105,963 | 10th | +26% | 17th | 12% above peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | $58,613 | 26th | +26% | 18th | 38% below peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | $124,168 | 3rd | +26% | 19th | 32% above peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | $106,801 | 9th | +26% | 20th | 13% above peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | $108,198 | 7th | +25% | 21st | 15% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | $68,166 | 25th | +22% | 22nd | 28% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | $96,434 | 15th | +22% | 23rd | 2% above peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | $71,512 | 21st | +22% | 24th | 24% below peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | $78,387 | 19th | +22% | 25th | 17% below peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | $116,723 | 5th | +21% | 26th | 24% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | $55,504 | 29th | +20% | 27th | 41% below peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | $58,546 | 27th | +19% | 28th | 38% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | $126,334 | 2nd | +19% | 29th | 34% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | $97,514 | 14th | +17% | 30th | 3% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | $94,390 | 16th | +7% | 31st | on par with peers |
The last 12 months moved in the better direction. The multi-year trend has not (yet) passed the checks below, so no sustained-improvement claim is made.
Unemployment fell 0.2 percentage points over the 12 months ending July 2026, faster than 59% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 5.1% (Jul 26) | -0.4pp | ||||
| United States ref | 4.1% (Aug 26) | -0.2pp | ||||
| Pawtucket, RI | 4.2% (Jul 26) | 11th | -1.0pp | 1st | 7% below peers | |
| Rock Hill, SC | 5.1% (Jul 26) | 23rd | -0.8pp | 2nd | 13% above peers | |
| Hammond, IN | 4.6% (Jul 26) | 17th | -0.6pp | 3rd | 2% above peers | |
| Bismarck, ND | 2.0% (Jul 26) | 1st | -0.6pp | 4th | 56% below peers | |
| Gulfport, MS | 3.5% (Jul 26) | 6th | -0.5pp | 5th | 22% below peers | |
| Caldwell, ID | 3.8% (Jul 26) | 7th | -0.4pp | 6th | 16% below peers | |
| Ankeny, IA | 3.1% (Jul 26) | 2nd | -0.4pp | 7th | 31% below peers | |
| Napa, CA | 4.1% (Jul 26) | 9th | -0.3pp | 8th | 9% below peers | |
| Tustin, CA | 4.1% (Jul 26) | 10th | -0.3pp | 9th | 9% below peers | |
| Alameda, CA | 4.9% (Jul 26) | 20th | -0.3pp | 10th | 9% above peers | |
| Chino Hills, CA | 4.3% (Jul 26) | 13th | -0.3pp | 11th | 4% below peers | |
| Rocklin, CA | 4.5% (Jul 26) | 15th | -0.2pp | 12th | on par with peers | |
| Iowa City, IA | 3.2% (Jul 26) | 4th | -0.2pp | 13th | 29% below peers | |
| Noblesville, IN | 3.2% (Jul 26) | 5th | -0.2pp | 14th | 29% below peers | |
| Pittsburg, CA | 5.4% (Jul 26) | 25th | -0.2pp | 15th | 20% above peers | |
| Racine, WI | 4.6% (Jul 26) | 18th | -0.1pp | 16th | 2% above peers | |
| Rogers, AR | 3.1% (Jul 26) | 3rd | -0.1pp | 17th | 31% below peers | |
| Schaumburg, IL | 4.5% (Jul 26) | 16th | +0.1pp | 18th | on par with peers | |
| Marysville, WA | 4.9% (Jul 26) | 21st | +0.1pp | 19th | 9% above peers | |
| Rochester Hills, MI | 3.9% (Jul 26) | 8th | +0.2pp | 20th | 13% below peers | |
| Evanston, IL | 4.9% (Jul 26) | 22nd | +0.2pp | 21st | 9% above peers | |
| San Marcos, TX | 4.2% (Jul 26) | 12th | +0.3pp | 22nd | 7% below peers | |
| Missouri City, TX | 5.7% (Jul 26) | 26th | +0.4pp | 23rd | 27% above peers | |
| Arlington Heights, IL | 4.4% (Jul 26) | 14th | +0.4pp | 24th | 2% below peers | |
| Southfield, MI | 6.9% (Jul 26) | 27th | +0.4pp | 25th | 53% above peers | |
| Flagstaff, AZ | 5.1% (Jul 26) | 24th | +0.5pp | 26th | 13% above peers | |
| Blaine, MN | 4.7% (Jul 26) | 19th | +0.7pp | 27th | 4% above peers | |
| New Britain, CT | 8.3% (Jul 26) | 28th | +2.1pp | 28th | 84% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Poverty changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (5.6% then, 5.6% now; margin ±1.4pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 12.0% | -1.3pp | |||||
| United States ref | 12.4% | ||||||
| Caldwell, ID | 11.9% | 21st | -4.6pp | 1st | 16% above peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 4.2% | 1st | -1.2pp | 2nd | 59% below peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 5.3% | 3rd | -1.3pp | 3rd | 49% below peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 12.6% | 22nd | -3.0pp | 4th | 23% above peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 18.1% | 25th | -3.6pp | 5th | 76% above peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 26.9% | 31st | -5.2pp | 6th | 163% above peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 13.3% | 24th | -2.3pp | 7th | 30% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 19.1% | 28th | -3.0pp | 8th | 87% above peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 18.2% | 27th | -2.8pp | 9th | 78% above peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 22.8% | 29th | -3.5pp | 10th | 123% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 11.2% | 19th | -1.7pp | 11th | 9% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 9.9% | 15th | -1.5pp | 12th | 3% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 11.8% | 20th | -1.6pp | 13th | 15% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 5.7% | 5th | -0.7pp | 14th | 45% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 10.2% | 16th | -1.0pp | 15th | on par with peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 12.6% | 23rd | -0.7pp | 16th | 23% above peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 26.3% | 30th | -1.3pp | 17th | 157% above peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 7.2% | 9th | -0.1pp | 18th | 30% below peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 5.6% | 4th | -0.0pp | 19th | 45% below peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 10.5% | 17th | +0.0pp | 20th | 2% above peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 10.7% | 18th | +0.1pp | 21st | 5% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 6.4% | 7th | +0.0pp | 22nd | 37% below peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 9.3% | 14th | +0.1pp | 23rd | 9% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 18.2% | 26th | +0.7pp | 24th | 77% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 8.5% | 13th | +0.5pp | 25th | 17% below peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 5.2% | 2nd | +0.4pp | 26th | 50% below peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 8.1% | 12th | +0.9pp | 27th | 21% below peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 7.2% | 10th | +1.4pp | 28th | 29% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 7.6% | 11th | +1.6pp | 29th | 26% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 7.1% | 8th | +2.4pp | 30th | 31% below peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 6.0% | 6th | +2.1pp | 31st | 41% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Child poverty changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (5.1% then, 3.9% now; margin ±1.7pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 15.0% | -3.1pp | |||||
| United States ref | 16.1% | ||||||
| Southfield, MI | 5.9% | 8th | -8.2pp | 1st | 48% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 3.8% | 2nd | -4.6pp | 2nd | 67% below peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 18.1% | 27th | -15.9pp | 3rd | 59% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 4.4% | 5th | -3.4pp | 4th | 62% below peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 17.3% | 24th | -7.1pp | 5th | 51% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 5.3% | 6th | -2.1pp | 6th | 54% below peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 24.0% | 29th | -9.4pp | 7th | 110% above peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 15.6% | 19th | -5.1pp | 8th | 37% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 26.2% | 30th | -8.6pp | 9th | 130% above peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 3.9% | 3rd | -1.2pp | 10th | 66% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 23.8% | 28th | -6.5pp | 11th | 108% above peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 14.2% | 18th | -3.6pp | 12th | 24% above peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 17.5% | 26th | -4.3pp | 13th | 53% above peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 31.6% | 31st | -7.5pp | 14th | 176% above peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 6.1% | 9th | -1.3pp | 15th | 47% below peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 3.4% | 1st | -0.6pp | 16th | 70% below peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 13.5% | 17th | -2.4pp | 17th | 18% above peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 17.1% | 23rd | -2.9pp | 18th | 50% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 16.5% | 21st | -0.3pp | 19th | 44% above peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 17.5% | 25th | +1.0pp | 20th | 53% above peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 16.4% | 20th | +1.2pp | 21st | 44% above peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 9.7% | 12th | +0.8pp | 22nd | 15% below peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 8.3% | 10th | +0.9pp | 23rd | 28% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 10.0% | 15th | +1.3pp | 24th | 13% below peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 9.7% | 13th | +1.3pp | 25th | 15% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 11.4% | 16th | +1.6pp | 26th | on par with peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 5.8% | 7th | +1.3pp | 27th | 50% below peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 9.9% | 14th | +2.9pp | 28th | 13% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 9.4% | 11th | +4.0pp | 29th | 18% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 16.6% | 22nd | +7.3pp | 30th | 46% above peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 4.3% | 4th | +2.9pp | 31st | 63% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Broadband rose 3.9 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 92.6% to 96.6% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.3pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 93.6% | +6.6pp | |||||
| United States ref | 91.1% | ||||||
| Rogers, AR | 93.8% | 16th | +26.5pp | 1st | on par with peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 87.3% | 27th | +13.3pp | 2nd | 7% below peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 85.1% | 31st | +12.4pp | 3rd | 9% below peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 85.3% | 30th | +10.4pp | 4th | 9% below peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 86.0% | 29th | +10.1pp | 5th | 8% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 89.2% | 23rd | +9.9pp | 6th | 5% below peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 92.4% | 18th | +10.1pp | 7th | 1% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 88.4% | 25th | +8.7pp | 8th | 6% below peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 89.6% | 22nd | +8.7pp | 9th | 4% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 91.9% | 20th | +8.3pp | 10th | 2% below peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 88.2% | 26th | +6.3pp | 11th | 6% below peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 95.2% | 10th | +6.2pp | 12th | 2% above peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 91.3% | 21st | +5.2pp | 13th | 3% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 94.2% | 14th | +5.0pp | 14th | on par with peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 93.9% | 15th | +4.7pp | 15th | on par with peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 93.4% | 17th | +4.6pp | 16th | on par with peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 96.5% | 3rd | +4.7pp | 17th | 3% above peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 95.0% | 11th | +4.4pp | 18th | 1% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 95.6% | 7th | +4.1pp | 19th | 2% above peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 96.6% | 2nd | +3.9pp | 20th | 3% above peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 95.3% | 9th | +3.9pp | 21st | 2% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 95.4% | 8th | +3.7pp | 22nd | 2% above peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 94.7% | 12th | +3.6pp | 23rd | 1% above peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 94.3% | 13th | +3.5pp | 24th | 1% above peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 88.7% | 24th | +3.0pp | 25th | 5% below peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 95.9% | 6th | +2.7pp | 26th | 2% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 97.6% | 1st | +2.7pp | 27th | 4% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 96.3% | 4th | +2.5pp | 28th | 3% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 96.3% | 5th | +1.7pp | 29th | 3% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 92.1% | 19th | +1.4pp | 30th | 2% below peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 86.5% | 28th | -0.6pp | 31st | 8% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin, in the wrong direction for this metric.
Inequality rose about 9% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 0.40 to 0.44 - more than the combined survey margin (±0.02). That is movement in the wrong direction.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 0.49 | +0.000 | |||||
| United States ref | 0.48 | +0.001 | |||||
| Rogers, AR | 0.46 | 23rd | -0.041 | 1st | 5% above peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 0.43 | 14th | -0.034 | 2nd | 2% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 0.41 | 8th | -0.030 | 3rd | 6% below peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 0.37 | 1st | -0.023 | 4th | 15% below peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 0.42 | 11th | -0.024 | 5th | 5% below peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 0.46 | 25th | -0.023 | 6th | 5% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 0.42 | 12th | -0.019 | 7th | 5% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 0.46 | 24th | -0.018 | 8th | 5% above peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 0.38 | 3rd | -0.013 | 9th | 13% below peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 0.43 | 15th | -0.014 | 10th | 1% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 0.40 | 5th | -0.010 | 11th | 9% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 0.54 | 31st | -0.013 | 12th | 24% above peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 0.39 | 4th | -0.006 | 13th | 10% below peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 0.45 | 21st | -0.004 | 14th | 3% above peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 0.44 | 16th | -0.001 | 15th | on par with peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 0.44 | 18th | +0.002 | 16th | 1% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 0.44 | 19th | +0.002 | 17th | 2% above peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 0.38 | 2nd | +0.003 | 18th | 14% below peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 0.41 | 6th | +0.003 | 19th | 6% below peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 0.49 | 29th | +0.006 | 20th | 12% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 0.44 | 20th | +0.009 | 21st | 2% above peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 0.53 | 30th | +0.015 | 22nd | 20% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 0.46 | 26th | +0.016 | 23rd | 6% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 0.41 | 7th | +0.016 | 24th | 6% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 0.49 | 28th | +0.023 | 25th | 12% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 0.41 | 10th | +0.022 | 26th | 6% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 0.46 | 22nd | +0.027 | 27th | 4% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 0.41 | 9th | +0.025 | 28th | 6% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 0.47 | 27th | +0.029 | 29th | 8% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 0.42 | 13th | +0.032 | 30th | 4% below peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 0.44 | 17th | +0.038 | 31st | on par with peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin, in the wrong direction for this metric.
SNAP rose 2.1 percentage points between the 2014-2018 and 2019-2023 surveys, from 3.6% to 5.7% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.3pp). That is movement in the wrong direction.
| Place | Latest2019-2023 survey | Today's rank | Change2014-2018 → 2019-2023 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 11.4% | +2.2pp | |||||
| United States ref | 11.8% | -0.5pp | |||||
| Ankeny, IA | 3.1% | 1st | -2.3pp | 1st | 59% below peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 12.5% | 23rd | -8.3pp | 2nd | 66% above peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 8.5% | 19th | -5.2pp | 3rd | 14% above peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 5.2% | 6th | -1.8pp | 4th | 31% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 21.2% | 29th | -6.9pp | 5th | 182% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 6.7% | 13th | -1.9pp | 6th | 10% below peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 6.6% | 11th | -1.6pp | 7th | 13% below peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 7.5% | 17th | -1.8pp | 8th | on par with peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 20.4% | 28th | -3.9pp | 9th | 172% above peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 28.1% | 31st | -3.8pp | 10th | 274% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 18.6% | 27th | -1.7pp | 11th | 148% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 7.2% | 14th | -0.6pp | 12th | 4% below peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 3.8% | 2nd | -0.1pp | 13th | 50% below peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 22.5% | 30th | -0.6pp | 14th | 200% above peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 4.3% | 3rd | -0.1pp | 15th | 42% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 9.3% | 20th | -0.1pp | 16th | 24% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 14.8% | 26th | +0.0pp | 17th | 97% above peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 6.3% | 10th | +0.1pp | 18th | 16% below peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 10.8% | 21st | +0.2pp | 19th | 44% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 7.5% | 15th | +0.2pp | 20th | 1% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 5.9% | 9th | +0.2pp | 21st | 21% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 13.4% | 24th | +1.0pp | 22nd | 79% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 13.7% | 25th | +1.4pp | 23rd | 83% above peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 4.4% | 4th | +0.5pp | 24th | 42% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 5.8% | 8th | +0.7pp | 25th | 23% below peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 6.6% | 12th | +1.0pp | 26th | 12% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 12.2% | 22nd | +2.3pp | 27th | 63% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 7.5% | 16th | +2.0pp | 28th | on par with peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 7.7% | 18th | +2.9pp | 29th | 3% above peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 5.7% | 7th | +2.1pp | 30th | 24% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 4.7% | 5th | +2.8pp | 31st | 38% below peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge only reports which way it is moving and how fast next to the selected peers. Most of the selected peers are rising faster.
Home value was essentially flat over the 12 months ending August 2026.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | $764,158 (Aug 26) | +0.4% | ||||
| United States ref | $368,697 (Aug 26) | +1.2% | ||||
| Arlington Heights, IL | $495,520 (Aug 26) | 10th | +8.9% | 1st | 24% above peers | |
| Evanston, IL | $493,385 (Aug 26) | 11th | +8.5% | 2nd | 24% above peers | |
| New Britain, CT | $312,170 (Aug 26) | 24th | +8.0% | 3rd | 22% below peers | |
| Racine, WI | $222,732 (Aug 26) | 28th | +5.9% | 4th | 44% below peers | |
| Bismarck, ND | $377,821 (Aug 26) | 19th | +5.5% | 5th | 5% below peers | |
| Schaumburg, IL | $360,740 (Aug 26) | 20th | +4.9% | 6th | 10% below peers | |
| Rochester Hills, MI | $469,977 (Aug 26) | 12th | +3.5% | 7th | 18% above peers | |
| Iowa City, IA | $303,890 (Aug 26) | 26th | +3.4% | 8th | 24% below peers | |
| Rogers, AR | $385,478 (Aug 26) | 17th | +3.0% | 9th | 3% below peers | |
| Noblesville, IN | $392,593 (Aug 26) | 16th | +2.0% | 10th | 2% below peers | |
| Gulfport, MS | $206,071 (Aug 26) | 29th | +2.0% | 11th | 48% below peers | |
| Southfield, MI | $253,902 (Aug 26) | 27th | +1.8% | 12th | 36% below peers | |
| Chino Hills, CA | $972,593 (Aug 26) | 3rd | +1.6% | 13th | 144% above peers | |
| Pawtucket, RI | $400,687 (Aug 26) | 13th | +1.5% | 14th | on par with peers | |
| Hammond, IN | $179,704 (Aug 26) | 30th | +1.5% | 15th | 55% below peers | |
| Blaine, MN | $381,495 (Aug 26) | 18th | +1.2% | 16th | 4% below peers | |
| Caldwell, ID | $399,412 (Aug 26) | 15th | +1.2% | 17th | on par with peers | |
| Alameda, CA | $1,137,620 (Aug 26) | 2nd | +1.2% | 18th | 185% above peers | |
| Ankeny, IA | $338,606 (Aug 26) | 21st | +0.8% | 19th | 15% below peers | |
| Rocklin, CA | $690,121 (Aug 26) | 5th | +0.3% | 20th | 73% above peers | |
| Tustin, CA | $1,157,866 (Aug 26) | 1st | +0.2% | 21st | 190% above peers | |
| Carmichael, CA | $552,774 (Aug 26) | 9th | +0.1% | 22nd | 38% above peers | |
| Flagstaff, AZ | $656,451 (Aug 26) | 6th | +0.1% | 23rd | 64% above peers | |
| Marysville, WA | $617,386 (Aug 26) | 7th | +0.1% | 24th | 55% above peers | |
| Pittsburg, CA | $558,760 (Aug 26) | 8th | -1.2% | 25th | 40% above peers | |
| Missouri City, TX | $333,316 (Aug 26) | 22nd | -1.6% | 26th | 17% below peers | |
| Rock Hill, SC | $323,886 (Aug 26) | 23rd | -1.7% | 27th | 19% below peers | |
| Napa, CA | $862,725 (Aug 26) | 4th | -2.0% | 28th | 116% above peers | |
| Wesley Chapel, FL | $400,424 (Aug 26) | 14th | -2.8% | 29th | on par with peers | |
| San Marcos, TX | $306,851 (Aug 26) | 25th | -3.4% | 30th | 23% below peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers.
Starter homes rose about 1% over the 12 months ending August 2026, slower than 59% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | $467,879 (Aug 26) | -0.0% | ||||
| United States ref | $200,550 (Aug 26) | +2.2% | ||||
| New Britain, CT | $251,266 (Aug 26) | 21st | +10.1% | 1st | 16% below peers | |
| Racine, WI | $170,112 (Aug 26) | 28th | +8.4% | 2nd | 43% below peers | |
| Evanston, IL | $295,656 (Aug 26) | 16th | +8.4% | 3rd | 1% below peers | |
| Bismarck, ND | $254,390 (Aug 26) | 20th | +6.7% | 4th | 15% below peers | |
| Arlington Heights, IL | $294,956 (Aug 26) | 17th | +6.1% | 5th | 1% below peers | |
| Gulfport, MS | $128,674 (Aug 26) | 30th | +4.1% | 6th | 57% below peers | |
| Schaumburg, IL | $266,017 (Aug 26) | 19th | +4.1% | 7th | 11% below peers | |
| Iowa City, IA | $198,732 (Aug 26) | 26th | +4.0% | 8th | 33% below peers | |
| Rochester Hills, MI | $306,889 (Aug 26) | 13th | +3.2% | 9th | 3% above peers | |
| Rogers, AR | $274,329 (Aug 26) | 18th | +2.8% | 10th | 8% below peers | |
| Hammond, IN | $142,571 (Aug 26) | 29th | +2.7% | 11th | 52% below peers | |
| Noblesville, IN | $298,391 (Aug 26) | 15th | +2.3% | 12th | on par with peers | |
| Caldwell, ID | $336,822 (Aug 26) | 11th | +2.0% | 13th | 13% above peers | |
| Pawtucket, RI | $348,268 (Aug 26) | 10th | +2.0% | 14th | 17% above peers | |
| Blaine, MN | $302,157 (Aug 26) | 14th | +1.7% | 15th | 1% above peers | |
| Chino Hills, CA | $741,876 (Aug 26) | 2nd | +1.1% | 16th | 149% above peers | |
| Alameda, CA | $812,803 (Aug 26) | 1st | +0.8% | 17th | 172% above peers | |
| Rocklin, CA | $557,680 (Aug 26) | 5th | +0.5% | 18th | 87% above peers | |
| Flagstaff, AZ | $469,108 (Aug 26) | 7th | +0.4% | 19th | 57% above peers | |
| Marysville, WA | $514,662 (Aug 26) | 6th | +0.3% | 20th | 72% above peers | |
| Ankeny, IA | $241,477 (Aug 26) | 22nd | +0.2% | 21st | 19% below peers | |
| Southfield, MI | $170,307 (Aug 26) | 27th | -0.3% | 22nd | 43% below peers | |
| Carmichael, CA | $417,873 (Aug 26) | 9th | -0.3% | 23rd | 40% above peers | |
| Tustin, CA | $732,842 (Aug 26) | 3rd | -0.9% | 24th | 146% above peers | |
| Pittsburg, CA | $454,225 (Aug 26) | 8th | -1.5% | 25th | 52% above peers | |
| Missouri City, TX | $239,572 (Aug 26) | 23rd | -1.7% | 26th | 20% below peers | |
| Napa, CA | $644,528 (Aug 26) | 4th | -2.3% | 27th | 116% above peers | |
| Wesley Chapel, FL | $309,038 (Aug 26) | 12th | -2.6% | 28th | 4% above peers | |
| Rock Hill, SC | $211,869 (Aug 26) | 25th | -3.2% | 29th | 29% below peers | |
| San Marcos, TX | $227,729 (Aug 26) | 24th | -3.5% | 30th | 24% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Homeownership changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (67.1% then, 68.3% now; margin ±2.6pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 55.9% | +1.0pp | |||||
| United States ref | 65.2% | ||||||
| Racine, WI | 60.2% | 17th | +9.2pp | 1st | 3% below peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 73.0% | 6th | +9.7pp | 2nd | 17% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 62.3% | 16th | +8.0pp | 3rd | on par with peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 45.0% | 29th | +5.0pp | 4th | 28% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 53.4% | 23rd | +5.6pp | 5th | 14% below peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 50.1% | 26th | +5.0pp | 6th | 20% below peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 55.1% | 21st | +5.1pp | 7th | 12% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 50.7% | 25th | +2.7pp | 8th | 19% below peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 77.1% | 3rd | +3.1pp | 9th | 24% above peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 30.8% | 31st | +1.1pp | 10th | 51% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 71.1% | 9th | +2.6pp | 11th | 14% above peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 65.5% | 13th | +2.2pp | 12th | 5% above peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 69.4% | 10th | +2.2pp | 13th | 11% above peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 54.2% | 22nd | +1.7pp | 14th | 13% below peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 62.4% | 15th | +1.8pp | 15th | on par with peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 68.3% | 12th | +1.2pp | 16th | 10% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 56.2% | 20th | +0.4pp | 17th | 10% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 58.7% | 18th | +0.4pp | 18th | 6% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 81.8% | 2nd | +0.3pp | 19th | 31% above peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 71.2% | 8th | -0.0pp | 20th | 14% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 76.7% | 4th | -0.4pp | 21st | 23% above peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 57.2% | 19th | -0.4pp | 22nd | 8% below peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 74.0% | 5th | -0.6pp | 23rd | 19% above peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 47.2% | 28th | -0.5pp | 24th | 24% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 63.0% | 14th | -0.8pp | 25th | 1% above peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 85.3% | 1st | -1.1pp | 26th | 37% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 48.8% | 27th | -0.9pp | 27th | 22% below peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 71.3% | 7th | -2.4pp | 28th | 14% above peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 52.2% | 24th | -1.9pp | 29th | 16% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 69.2% | 11th | -5.8pp | 30th | 11% above peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 42.3% | 30th | -5.1pp | 31st | 32% below peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers.
Rent rose about 3% over the 12 months ending August 2026, faster than 66% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States ref | $1,948 (Aug 26) | +2.5% | ||||
| Iowa City, IA | $1,270 (Aug 26) | 29th | +8.8% | 1st | 32% below peers | |
| Alameda, CA | $2,953 (Aug 26) | 3rd | +6.2% | 2nd | 57% above peers | |
| Hammond, IN | $1,498 (Aug 26) | 24th | +5.5% | 3rd | 20% below peers | |
| New Britain, CT | $1,623 (Aug 26) | 20th | +5.2% | 4th | 13% below peers | |
| Pawtucket, RI | $1,876 (Aug 26) | 15th | +5.1% | 5th | on par with peers | |
| Noblesville, IN | $1,741 (Aug 26) | 18th | +4.6% | 6th | 7% below peers | |
| Racine, WI | $1,242 (Aug 26) | 30th | +4.3% | 7th | 34% below peers | |
| Evanston, IL | $2,438 (Aug 26) | 8th | +4.3% | 8th | 30% above peers | |
| Caldwell, ID | $1,695 (Aug 26) | 19th | +4.1% | 9th | 10% below peers | |
| Bismarck, ND | $1,306 (Aug 26) | 28th | +3.4% | 10th | 30% below peers | |
| Rocklin, CA | $2,478 (Aug 26) | 6th | +3.1% | 11th | 32% above peers | |
| Pittsburg, CA | $2,453 (Aug 26) | 7th | +3.1% | 12th | 31% above peers | |
| Southfield, MI | $1,584 (Aug 26) | 21st | +3.0% | 13th | 16% below peers | |
| Schaumburg, IL | $2,147 (Aug 26) | 11th | +2.9% | 14th | 14% above peers | |
| Carmichael, CA | $1,741 (Aug 26) | 17th | +2.1% | 15th | 7% below peers | |
| Blaine, MN | $2,078 (Aug 26) | 13th | +1.9% | 16th | 11% above peers | |
| Marysville, WA | $2,554 (Aug 26) | 5th | +1.8% | 17th | 36% above peers | |
| Gulfport, MS | $1,483 (Aug 26) | 26th | +1.6% | 18th | 21% below peers | |
| Ankeny, IA | $1,526 (Aug 26) | 22nd | +1.4% | 19th | 19% below peers | |
| Tustin, CA | $3,152 (Aug 26) | 1st | +1.3% | 20th | 68% above peers | |
| Rogers, AR | $1,513 (Aug 26) | 23rd | +1.3% | 21st | 19% below peers | |
| Arlington Heights, IL | $1,985 (Aug 26) | 14th | +1.3% | 22nd | 6% above peers | |
| Rock Hill, SC | $1,488 (Aug 26) | 25th | +1.2% | 23rd | 21% below peers | |
| Rochester Hills, MI | $1,812 (Aug 26) | 16th | +1.1% | 24th | 3% below peers | |
| Chino Hills, CA | $3,011 (Aug 26) | 2nd | +0.9% | 25th | 60% above peers | |
| Napa, CA | $2,863 (Aug 26) | 4th | +0.5% | 26th | 53% above peers | |
| San Marcos, TX | $1,428 (Aug 26) | 27th | +0.0% | 27th | 24% below peers | |
| Wesley Chapel, FL | $2,220 (Aug 26) | 9th | -0.1% | 28th | 18% above peers | |
| Missouri City, TX | $2,117 (Aug 26) | 12th | -0.3% | 29th | 13% above peers | |
| Flagstaff, AZ | $2,166 (Aug 26) | 10th | -0.8% | 30th | 15% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Cost burden changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (34.8% then, 35.6% now; margin ±3.3pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 41.7% | +0.0pp | |||||
| United States ref | 32.2% | +0.4pp | |||||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 21.4% | 1st | -2.2pp | 1st | 41% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 35.6% | 14th | -3.6pp | 2nd | 1% below peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 25.8% | 7th | -2.4pp | 3rd | 28% below peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 37.9% | 21st | -3.3pp | 4th | 5% above peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 23.5% | 5th | -1.3pp | 5th | 35% below peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 38.5% | 22nd | -1.5pp | 6th | 7% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 43.5% | 28th | -1.4pp | 7th | 21% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 43.8% | 29th | -1.3pp | 8th | 22% above peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 36.8% | 18th | -0.7pp | 9th | 2% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 37.2% | 20th | -0.3pp | 10th | 3% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 40.0% | 24th | +0.0pp | 11th | 11% above peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 36.0% | 16th | +0.1pp | 12th | on par with peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 25.6% | 6th | +0.2pp | 13th | 29% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 37.1% | 19th | +0.8pp | 14th | 3% above peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 32.0% | 11th | +0.7pp | 15th | 11% below peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 35.6% | 15th | +0.9pp | 16th | 1% below peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 44.4% | 30th | +1.1pp | 17th | 23% above peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 23.1% | 3rd | +0.7pp | 18th | 36% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 29.2% | 9th | +1.3pp | 19th | 19% below peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 42.2% | 26th | +1.9pp | 20th | 17% above peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 28.7% | 8th | +1.4pp | 21st | 20% below peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 23.4% | 4th | +1.2pp | 22nd | 35% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 39.5% | 23rd | +2.1pp | 23rd | 10% above peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 52.7% | 31st | +2.9pp | 24th | 46% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 32.2% | 12th | +2.2pp | 25th | 11% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 42.7% | 27th | +3.1pp | 26th | 19% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 41.8% | 25th | +3.3pp | 27th | 16% above peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 35.0% | 13th | +2.9pp | 28th | 3% below peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 30.1% | 10th | +3.0pp | 29th | 16% below peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 22.8% | 2nd | +2.5pp | 30th | 37% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 36.8% | 17th | +10.8pp | 31st | 2% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
No vehicle changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (4.1% then, 3.7% now; margin ±1.2pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 7.1% | -0.0pp | |||||
| United States ref | 8.3% | -0.3pp | |||||
| Racine, WI | 7.7% | 21st | -5.4pp | 1st | 20% above peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 2.4% | 3rd | -1.1pp | 2nd | 63% below peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 3.6% | 8th | -1.3pp | 3rd | 44% below peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 3.3% | 7th | -0.9pp | 4th | 48% below peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 8.3% | 24th | -2.1pp | 5th | 30% above peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 8.4% | 25th | -1.6pp | 6th | 32% above peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 5.3% | 13th | -0.8pp | 7th | 16% below peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 8.6% | 26th | -1.1pp | 8th | 34% above peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 3.7% | 9th | -0.4pp | 9th | 42% below peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 4.7% | 11th | -0.5pp | 10th | 27% below peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 15.3% | 30th | -1.2pp | 11th | 139% above peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 12.7% | 29th | -0.8pp | 12th | 98% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 5.4% | 14th | -0.1pp | 13th | 16% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 5.1% | 12th | -0.0pp | 14th | 20% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 8.1% | 22nd | -0.0pp | 15th | 26% above peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 6.9% | 17th | -0.0pp | 16th | 8% above peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 1.8% | 1st | +0.0pp | 17th | 71% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 10.0% | 27th | +0.2pp | 18th | 56% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 2.5% | 5th | +0.0pp | 19th | 60% below peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 4.3% | 10th | +0.1pp | 20th | 32% below peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 2.0% | 2nd | +0.0pp | 21st | 69% below peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 11.0% | 28th | +0.3pp | 22nd | 72% above peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 7.1% | 19th | +0.2pp | 23rd | 12% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 17.3% | 31st | +0.8pp | 24th | 170% above peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 7.2% | 20th | +1.0pp | 25th | 13% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 7.1% | 18th | +1.2pp | 26th | 11% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 2.6% | 6th | +0.5pp | 27th | 60% below peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 8.1% | 23rd | +1.8pp | 28th | 27% above peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 5.6% | 15th | +1.6pp | 29th | 13% below peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 2.5% | 4th | +0.9pp | 30th | 62% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 6.4% | 16th | +2.5pp | 31st | on par with peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Uninsured fell 1.6 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 4.1% to 2.6% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.9pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 6.6% | -0.9pp | |||||
| United States ref | 8.4% | -0.4pp | |||||
| Rocklin, CA | 2.6% | 2nd | -1.6pp | 1st | 58% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 4.1% | 8th | -2.3pp | 2nd | 33% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 2.0% | 1st | -1.1pp | 3rd | 68% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 2.7% | 3rd | -1.4pp | 4th | 56% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 3.9% | 7th | -1.5pp | 5th | 37% below peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 4.7% | 11th | -1.5pp | 6th | 23% below peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 4.5% | 10th | -1.3pp | 7th | 27% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 5.2% | 14th | -0.9pp | 8th | 16% below peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 15.6% | 30th | -2.5pp | 9th | 153% above peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 5.2% | 15th | -0.7pp | 10th | 16% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 6.2% | 17th | -0.8pp | 11th | 2% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 7.1% | 21st | -0.8pp | 12th | 16% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 6.5% | 19th | -0.7pp | 13th | 5% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 4.3% | 9th | -0.5pp | 14th | 31% below peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 9.1% | 24th | -0.9pp | 15th | 47% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 10.3% | 25th | -1.0pp | 16th | 67% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 7.1% | 22nd | -0.5pp | 17th | 16% above peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 3.6% | 5th | -0.1pp | 18th | 41% below peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 2.9% | 4th | +0.0pp | 19th | 53% below peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 13.0% | 28th | +0.2pp | 20th | 112% above peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 16.4% | 31st | +0.4pp | 21st | 167% above peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 14.8% | 29th | +0.7pp | 22nd | 140% above peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 10.5% | 26th | +0.9pp | 23rd | 71% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 5.0% | 13th | +0.4pp | 24th | 19% below peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 3.7% | 6th | +0.3pp | 25th | 40% below peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 4.8% | 12th | +0.5pp | 26th | 21% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 8.2% | 23rd | +1.0pp | 27th | 34% above peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 6.2% | 16th | +1.0pp | 28th | on par with peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 6.4% | 18th | +1.4pp | 29th | 4% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 11.8% | 27th | +2.5pp | 30th | 92% above peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 7.1% | 20th | +1.7pp | 31st | 15% above peers |
Modeled estimate with no usable trend; the level is shown and no trend claims are made.
Adult obesity is about two-thirds of the peer median.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 28.4% | |||
| United States ref | 33.4% | |||
| Alameda, CA | 18.2% | 1st | 47% below peers | |
| Rocklin, CA | 24.1% | 2nd | 30% below peers | |
| Tustin, CA | 25.3% | 3rd | 26% below peers | |
| Chino Hills, CA | 25.7% | 4th | 25% below peers | |
| Schaumburg, IL | 26.3% | 5th | 24% below peers | |
| Rochester Hills, MI | 26.4% | 6th | 23% below peers | |
| Flagstaff, AZ | 26.5% | 7th | 23% below peers | |
| Arlington Heights, IL | 27.2% | 8th | 21% below peers | |
| Napa, CA | 29.5% | 9th | 14% below peers | |
| Evanston, IL | 29.8% | 10th | 13% below peers | |
| Noblesville, IN | 30.8% | 11th | 10% below peers | |
| Pittsburg, CA | 31.7% | 12th | 8% below peers | |
| Iowa City, IA | 32.4% | 13th | 6% below peers | |
| Cheektowaga, NY | 32.6% | 14th | 5% below peers | |
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 32.8% | 15th | 5% below peers | |
| Carmichael, CA | 34.4% | 16th | on par with peers | |
| Marysville, WA | 34.7% | 17th | 1% above peers | |
| Pawtucket, RI | 34.8% | 18th | 1% above peers | |
| Ankeny, IA | 34.8% | 19th | 1% above peers | |
| Rock Hill, SC | 35.3% | 20th | 3% above peers | |
| Missouri City, TX | 35.4% | 21st | 3% above peers | |
| Blaine, MN | 35.9% | 22nd | 4% above peers | |
| Rogers, AR | 36.8% | 23rd | 7% above peers | |
| Gulfport, MS | 37.4% | 24th | 9% above peers | |
| San Marcos, TX | 37.6% | 25th | 9% above peers | |
| New Britain, CT | 38.3% | 26th | 11% above peers | |
| Southfield, MI | 38.8% | 27th | 13% above peers | |
| Caldwell, ID | 39.0% | 28th | 13% above peers | |
| Bismarck, ND | 39.5% | 29th | 15% above peers | |
| Hammond, IN | 41.8% | 30th | 22% above peers | |
| Racine, WI | 42.9% | 31st | 25% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Child uninsured fell 2.7 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 3.9% to 1.2% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.9pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 3.2% | -0.0pp | |||||
| United States ref | 5.5% | +0.4pp | |||||
| Southfield, MI | 0.3% | 1st | -2.9pp | 1st | 89% below peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 1.2% | 3rd | -2.7pp | 2nd | 61% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 1.8% | 8th | -3.2pp | 3rd | 45% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 1.4% | 5th | -2.5pp | 4th | 56% below peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 1.5% | 6th | -1.6pp | 5th | 53% below peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 3.2% | 16th | -3.3pp | 6th | on par with peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 1.1% | 2nd | -1.0pp | 7th | 67% below peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 1.6% | 7th | -1.2pp | 8th | 50% below peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 1.9% | 9th | -0.9pp | 9th | 42% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 1.4% | 4th | -0.5pp | 10th | 57% below peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 4.3% | 23rd | -0.7pp | 11th | 34% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 4.2% | 22nd | -0.6pp | 12th | 30% above peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 3.2% | 17th | -0.2pp | 13th | 1% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 6.1% | 26th | +0.2pp | 14th | 91% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 4.4% | 24th | +0.2pp | 15th | 36% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 2.7% | 12th | +0.2pp | 16th | 16% below peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 8.0% | 28th | +0.6pp | 17th | 148% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 2.4% | 11th | +0.2pp | 18th | 24% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 2.9% | 13th | +0.3pp | 19th | 10% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 4.5% | 25th | +0.5pp | 20th | 39% above peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 8.3% | 29th | +1.2pp | 21st | 157% above peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 8.8% | 30th | +1.5pp | 22nd | 172% above peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 3.4% | 18th | +0.6pp | 23rd | 7% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 2.9% | 14th | +0.7pp | 24th | 9% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 7.5% | 27th | +1.9pp | 25th | 132% above peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 3.5% | 19th | +0.9pp | 26th | 7% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 3.7% | 21st | +1.3pp | 27th | 16% above peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 3.1% | 15th | +1.3pp | 28th | 5% below peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 3.5% | 20th | +2.2pp | 29th | 9% above peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 13.3% | 31st | +9.3pp | 30th | 314% above peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 1.9% | 10th | +1.4pp | 31st | 40% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
College attainment changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (46.4% then, 48.0% now; margin ±3.0pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 37.1% | +3.1pp | |||||
| United States ref | 35.7% | +3.5pp | |||||
| Caldwell, ID | 19.5% | 30th | +5.9pp | 1st | 50% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 21.4% | 28th | +4.8pp | 2nd | 45% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 29.6% | 23rd | +6.0pp | 3rd | 25% below peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 17.4% | 31st | +3.1pp | 4th | 56% below peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 24.3% | 24th | +3.8pp | 5th | 38% below peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 35.1% | 21st | +4.8pp | 6th | 10% below peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 47.8% | 12th | +6.2pp | 7th | 22% above peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 38.3% | 17th | +4.9pp | 8th | 2% below peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 34.4% | 22nd | +4.0pp | 9th | 12% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 61.5% | 2nd | +6.9pp | 10th | 57% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 23.6% | 25th | +2.5pp | 11th | 40% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 38.2% | 18th | +4.0pp | 12th | 3% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 52.3% | 6th | +5.2pp | 13th | 33% above peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 39.2% | 16th | +3.5pp | 14th | on par with peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 36.7% | 20th | +3.2pp | 15th | 6% below peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 51.6% | 8th | +4.2pp | 16th | 32% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 47.4% | 13th | +3.6pp | 17th | 21% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 40.7% | 15th | +2.9pp | 18th | 4% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 61.4% | 3rd | +4.0pp | 19th | 56% above peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 23.6% | 26th | +1.4pp | 20th | 40% below peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 36.9% | 19th | +2.0pp | 21st | 6% below peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 60.4% | 5th | +2.5pp | 22nd | 54% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 69.5% | 1st | +2.4pp | 23rd | 77% above peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 48.0% | 11th | +1.6pp | 24th | 22% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 48.1% | 10th | +1.4pp | 25th | 23% above peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 52.1% | 7th | +1.3pp | 26th | 33% above peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 60.5% | 4th | +1.4pp | 27th | 54% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 50.4% | 9th | +1.0pp | 28th | 29% above peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 22.2% | 27th | +0.4pp | 29th | 43% below peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 19.6% | 29th | -0.2pp | 30th | 50% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 41.8% | 14th | -1.9pp | 31st | 7% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Preschool enrollment changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (51.9% then, 43.9% now; margin ±12.7pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 44.5% | -5.1pp | |||||
| United States ref | 45.5% | ||||||
| Bismarck, ND | 38.1% | 22nd | +7.0pp | 1st | 13% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 49.3% | 7th | +7.0pp | 2nd | 12% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 45.4% | 13th | +6.0pp | 3rd | 3% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 54.7% | 5th | +6.5pp | 4th | 25% above peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 42.5% | 17th | +4.2pp | 5th | 3% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 69.8% | 1st | +4.1pp | 6th | 59% above peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 46.5% | 10th | +2.2pp | 7th | 6% above peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 66.4% | 2nd | +0.9pp | 8th | 51% above peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 36.8% | 24th | +0.4pp | 9th | 16% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 39.6% | 20th | -0.4pp | 10th | 10% below peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 64.5% | 3rd | -0.8pp | 11th | 47% above peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 46.3% | 11th | -0.6pp | 12th | 5% above peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 48.4% | 8th | -1.9pp | 13th | 10% above peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 47.5% | 9th | -2.0pp | 14th | 8% above peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 26.2% | 31st | -2.5pp | 15th | 40% below peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 43.9% | 16th | -6.0pp | 16th | on par with peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 45.6% | 12th | -7.6pp | 17th | 4% above peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 34.6% | 25th | -5.9pp | 18th | 21% below peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 38.2% | 21st | -6.8pp | 19th | 13% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 39.8% | 19th | -7.2pp | 20th | 9% below peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 43.9% | 15th | -8.0pp | 21st | on par with peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 51.5% | 6th | -12.5pp | 22nd | 17% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 45.2% | 14th | -11.8pp | 23rd | 3% above peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 37.2% | 23rd | -10.9pp | 24th | 15% below peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 29.5% | 28th | -8.9pp | 25th | 33% below peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 33.1% | 27th | -10.1pp | 26th | 25% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 55.2% | 4th | -17.1pp | 27th | 26% above peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 28.6% | 29th | -11.7pp | 28th | 35% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 33.5% | 26th | -17.2pp | 29th | 24% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 41.9% | 18th | -22.6pp | 30th | 5% below peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 27.9% | 30th | -16.7pp | 31st | 37% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed. Margins at this size are wide (low-reliability estimate); read the level, not the pace.
Disconnected youth changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (2.5% then, 4.5% now; margin ±3.2pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 6.7% | +0.2pp | |||||
| United States ref | 6.9% | +0.3pp | |||||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 1.1% | 2nd | -2.4pp | 1st | 75% below peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 1.8% | 3rd | -2.8pp | 2nd | 60% below peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 3.8% | 11th | -3.5pp | 3rd | 16% below peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 4.2% | 14th | -3.9pp | 4th | 6% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 6.0% | 19th | -4.9pp | 5th | 33% above peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 7.3% | 20th | -5.8pp | 6th | 63% above peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 4.4% | 15th | -1.8pp | 7th | 2% below peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 3.4% | 9th | -1.1pp | 8th | 25% below peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 10.5% | 30th | -2.4pp | 9th | 135% above peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 5.6% | 18th | -1.0pp | 10th | 25% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 8.2% | 24th | -1.3pp | 11th | 82% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 4.2% | 13th | -0.6pp | 12th | 6% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 3.6% | 10th | -0.2pp | 13th | 19% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 0.9% | 1st | -0.0pp | 14th | 79% below peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 8.9% | 26th | -0.3pp | 15th | 100% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 2.5% | 5th | +0.1pp | 16th | 43% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 11.5% | 31st | +1.0pp | 17th | 158% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 3.0% | 7th | +0.3pp | 18th | 32% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 3.9% | 12th | +0.6pp | 19th | 13% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 7.5% | 22nd | +1.2pp | 20th | 69% above peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 8.0% | 23rd | +2.3pp | 21st | 78% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 9.6% | 28th | +2.9pp | 22nd | 115% above peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 2.8% | 6th | +0.9pp | 23rd | 37% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 7.3% | 21st | +2.5pp | 24th | 63% above peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 4.5% | 16th | +2.0pp | 25th | on par with peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 3.2% | 8th | +1.9pp | 26th | 29% below peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 2.0% | 4th | +1.2pp | 27th | 56% below peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 10.2% | 29th | +6.1pp | 28th | 129% above peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 8.9% | 25th | +5.7pp | 29th | 99% above peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 9.0% | 27th | +7.1pp | 30th | 101% above peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 5.3% | 17th | +4.4pp | 31st | 19% above peers |
A real change beyond the survey margin; neither direction is inherently better for this metric.
Population rose about 13% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 64,835 to 73,327 - more than the combined survey margin (±122).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 76,011 | 16th | +31% | 1st | on par with peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 66,516 | 31st | +21% | 2nd | 12% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 76,948 | 7th | +19% | 3rd | 1% above peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 72,615 | 28th | +17% | 4th | 4% below peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 73,362 | 23rd | +16% | 5th | 3% below peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 73,327 | 24th | +13% | 6th | 4% below peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 72,488 | 29th | +13% | 7th | 5% below peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 70,897 | 30th | +12% | 8th | 7% below peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 72,981 | 27th | +10% | 9th | 4% below peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 76,257 | 13th | +7% | 10th | on par with peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 73,002 | 26th | +6% | 11th | 4% below peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 75,893 | 18th | +6% | 12th | on par with peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 76,445 | 11th | +6% | 13th | 1% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 76,236 | 14th | +4% | 14th | on par with peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 77,089 | 6th | +4% | 15th | 1% above peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 75,556 | 20th | +4% | 16th | 1% below peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 76,868 | 8th | +4% | 17th | 1% above peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 76,056 | 15th | +3% | 18th | on par with peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 76,558 | 10th | +3% | 19th | 1% above peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 75,259 | 21st | +3% | 20th | 1% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 76,340 | 12th | +2% | 21st | on par with peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 74,223 | 22nd | +2% | 22nd | 2% below peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 73,003 | 25th | +2% | 23rd | 4% below peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 75,752 | 19th | +1% | 24th | on par with peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 77,633 | 4th | +1% | 25th | 2% above peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 76,005 | 17th | +1% | 26th | on par with peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 76,768 | 9th | +0% | 27th | 1% above peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 78,239 | 2nd | -1% | 28th | 3% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 78,981 | 1st | -1% | 29th | 4% above peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 77,238 | 5th | -2% | 30th | 2% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 77,927 | 3rd | -3% | 31st | 3% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Single-parent changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (13.6% then, 13.7% now; margin ±3.4pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 28.5% | +0.7pp | |||||
| United States ref | 29.9% | -0.2pp | |||||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 15.3% | 28th | +4.7pp | 1st | 41% below peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 36.5% | 8th | +9.6pp | 2nd | 41% above peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 21.7% | 25th | +5.0pp | 3rd | 16% below peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 14.2% | 29th | +3.2pp | 4th | 45% below peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 22.6% | 22nd | +3.5pp | 5th | 12% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 22.4% | 23rd | +3.2pp | 6th | 14% below peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 34.8% | 9th | +4.9pp | 7th | 35% above peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 29.1% | 12th | +3.6pp | 8th | 12% above peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 24.1% | 20th | +2.8pp | 9th | 7% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 26.4% | 14th | +2.9pp | 10th | 2% above peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 28.5% | 13th | +2.6pp | 11th | 10% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 51.2% | 4th | +3.5pp | 12th | 98% above peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 25.6% | 17th | +1.6pp | 13th | 1% below peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 25.9% | 16th | +1.4pp | 14th | on par with peers | ||
| Schaumburg, IL | 20.2% | 26th | +1.0pp | 15th | 22% below peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 57.1% | 1st | +0.7pp | 16th | 121% above peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 23.4% | 21st | +0.3pp | 17th | 10% below peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 13.7% | 31st | +0.1pp | 18th | 47% below peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 13.7% | 30th | -0.7pp | 19th | 47% below peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 46.3% | 5th | -3.5pp | 20th | 79% above peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 56.3% | 2nd | -4.4pp | 21st | 118% above peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 40.2% | 7th | -3.3pp | 22nd | 55% above peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 22.3% | 24th | -2.0pp | 23rd | 14% below peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 53.1% | 3rd | -5.6pp | 24th | 105% above peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 40.2% | 6th | -4.9pp | 25th | 55% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 24.8% | 18th | -3.6pp | 26th | 4% below peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 34.5% | 10th | -6.6pp | 27th | 33% above peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 32.4% | 11th | -7.6pp | 28th | 25% above peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 18.0% | 27th | -4.2pp | 29th | 30% below peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 24.2% | 19th | -7.8pp | 30th | 7% below peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 26.1% | 15th | -9.4pp | 31st | 1% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Working parents changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (62.9% then, 63.2% now; margin ±9.8pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 66.5% | +3.8pp | |||||
| United States ref | 68.1% | +1.9pp | |||||
| Schaumburg, IL | 66.0% | 25th | +10.7pp | 1st | 6% below peers | ||
| Missouri City, TX | 77.6% | 5th | +12.6pp | 2nd | 10% above peers | ||
| Rochester Hills, MI | 68.4% | 22nd | +11.0pp | 3rd | 3% below peers | ||
| Pittsburg, CA | 69.2% | 20th | +9.3pp | 4th | 2% below peers | ||
| Arlington Heights, IL | 77.5% | 6th | +10.1pp | 5th | 10% above peers | ||
| Racine, WI | 78.3% | 4th | +9.5pp | 6th | 11% above peers | ||
| Hammond, IN | 62.3% | 29th | +6.4pp | 7th | 12% below peers | ||
| Caldwell, ID | 64.8% | 27th | +6.1pp | 8th | 8% below peers | ||
| Alameda, CA | 80.9% | 2nd | +7.0pp | 9th | 15% above peers | ||
| Wesley Chapel, FL | 72.3% | 13th | +6.0pp | 10th | 3% above peers | ||
| Chino Hills, CA | 66.0% | 24th | +5.5pp | 11th | 6% below peers | ||
| New Britain, CT | 72.6% | 12th | +5.2pp | 12th | 3% above peers | ||
| Flagstaff, AZ | 71.5% | 15th | +5.1pp | 13th | 2% above peers | ||
| Ankeny, IA | 84.0% | 1st | +5.2pp | 14th | 19% above peers | ||
| Tustin, CA | 68.0% | 23rd | +3.8pp | 15th | 3% below peers | ||
| Napa, CA | 75.8% | 8th | +3.2pp | 16th | 8% above peers | ||
| San Marcos, TX | 80.6% | 3rd | +3.2pp | 17th | 14% above peers | ||
| Iowa City, IA | 68.9% | 21st | +2.2pp | 18th | 2% below peers | ||
| Blaine, MN | 75.5% | 9th | +2.2pp | 19th | 7% above peers | ||
| Southfield, MI | 74.2% | 10th | +2.1pp | 20th | 5% above peers | ||
| Rogers, AR | 65.8% | 26th | +1.3pp | 21st | 6% below peers | ||
| Pawtucket, RI | 77.4% | 7th | +0.7pp | 22nd | 10% above peers | ||
| Rocklin, CA | 63.2% | 28th | +0.3pp | 23rd | 10% below peers | ||
| Evanston, IL | 70.4% | 16th | -0.7pp | 24th | on par with peers | ||
| Marysville, WA | 57.2% | 31st | -0.8pp | 25th | 19% below peers | ||
| Noblesville, IN | 69.5% | 19th | -1.6pp | 26th | 1% below peers | ||
| Gulfport, MS | 71.6% | 14th | -1.9pp | 27th | 2% above peers | ||
| Rock Hill, SC | 70.3% | 17th | -3.8pp | 28th | on par with peers | ||
| Carmichael, CA | 59.4% | 30th | -6.3pp | 29th | 16% below peers | ||
| Cheektowaga, NY | 70.3% | 18th | -8.4pp | 30th | on par with peers | ||
| Bismarck, ND | 74.1% | 11th | -10.8pp | 31st | 5% above peers |