DataWorks Commons
Catalina Foothills, AZ
← All cities

Catalina Foothills, AZ

See all data for this place →
52,593 people (2024) 50k-100k West

Bright spots 13 indicators

Where Catalina Foothills, AZ shows a real improvement in recent years, or stands clearly ahead of its peers. How this is calculated →

What needs attention 1 indicator

Where Catalina Foothills, AZ shows a real worsening in recent years, or trails its peers clearly. How this is calculated →

Big shifts 3 indicators

Real moves and big gaps, where neither direction is simply good or bad. Biggest relative change first; big-gap cards come last. How this is calculated →

All indicators

Economy
Economy

Median household income

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Household income rose about 24% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from $92,929 to $115,304 (each survey's own dollars, not adjusted for inflation) - more than the combined survey margin (±$9,207). 30 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the stronger third of similar-size cities and kept improving; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 30 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: household income rose about 45% from 2014 to 2024 ($79,568 to $115,304).
$115,304
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Arizona ref $79,964 +36%
United States ref $80,734 +28%
Cathedral City, CA $73,572 21st +58% 1st 22% below peers
Huntington Park, CA $59,996 27th +41% 2nd 36% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT $113,648 9th +36% 3rd 21% above peers
Paramount, CA $75,250 20th +35% 4th 20% below peers
Wake Forest, NC $123,802 3rd +34% 5th 32% above peers
Battle Creek, MI $55,693 28th +32% 6th 41% below peers
Aloha, OR $101,934 15th +30% 7th 9% above peers
Wheaton, MD $111,478 12th +30% 8th 19% above peers
Westchester, FL $72,262 22nd +30% 9th 23% below peers
Mooresville, NC $89,647 17th +30% 10th 5% below peers
Palm Desert, CA $77,513 18th +29% 11th 17% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD $111,575 11th +28% 12th 19% above peers
West New York, NJ $71,729 23rd +27% 13th 24% below peers
Dunwoody, GA $121,903 4th +27% 14th 30% above peers
Lincoln, CA $111,990 10th +26% 15th 19% above peers
Minnetonka, MN $119,517 5th +25% 16th 27% above peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ $115,304 8th +24% 17th 23% above peers
Elyria, OH $54,945 30th +24% 18th 42% below peers
Edina, MN $128,767 2nd +24% 19th 37% above peers
Columbus, IN $77,456 19th +22% 20th 18% below peers
Placentia, CA $115,929 6th +21% 21st 23% above peers
Kendale Lakes, FL $71,621 24th +21% 22nd 24% below peers
Florissant, MO $65,318 25th +19% 23rd 30% below peers
Burleson, TX $93,928 16th +18% 24th on par with peers
Oak Park, IL $110,820 13th +17% 25th 18% above peers
Levittown, NY $146,068 1st +17% 26th 56% above peers
Grand Island, NE $63,795 26th +16% 27th 32% below peers
Joplin, MO $52,097 31st +15% 28th 45% below peers
Novato, CA $115,736 7th +14% 29th 23% above peers
Galveston, TX $55,631 29th +13% 30th 41% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA $108,281 14th +9% 31st 15% above peers
Where is this changing? 17 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyMedian household income
Loading tract map…
4 of 17 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Palo Alto, CA up about 46% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 95% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Dublin, CA up about 43% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 92% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Bentonville, AR up about 40% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 88% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±$5,325 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Share of people below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Poverty fell 1.3 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 5.8% to 4.5% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.3pp). 9 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the stronger third of similar-size cities and kept improving; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 12 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: poverty fell 1.5 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (6.0% to 4.5%).
4.5%
20112024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Arizona ref 11.9% -2.4pp
United States ref 12.0%
Eagle Mountain, UT 3.6% 1st -3.8pp 1st 63% below peers
Westchester, FL 9.3% 14th -5.2pp 2nd 4% below peers
Cathedral City, CA 13.1% 24th -7.0pp 3rd 35% above peers
Aloha, OR 7.8% 12th -3.9pp 4th 20% below peers
Mooresville, NC 7.2% 10th -2.8pp 5th 25% below peers
Elyria, OH 16.5% 27th -6.3pp 6th 71% above peers
Paramount, CA 12.4% 22nd -4.1pp 7th 29% above peers
Huntington Park, CA 18.2% 29th -5.3pp 8th 88% above peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 4.5% 3rd -1.3pp 9th 54% below peers
Battle Creek, MI 17.3% 28th -4.4pp 10th 79% above peers
Columbus, IN 11.1% 21st -2.5pp 11th 15% above peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 10.3% 19th -2.3pp 12th 6% above peers
Palm Desert, CA 10.9% 20th -2.2pp 13th 13% above peers
Wake Forest, NC 4.4% 2nd -0.9pp 14th 55% below peers
Lincoln, CA 6.8% 8th -1.0pp 15th 29% below peers
Dunwoody, GA 6.1% 7th -0.9pp 16th 37% below peers
Florissant, MO 9.9% 17th -0.8pp 17th 3% above peers
Joplin, MO 16.4% 26th -1.2pp 18th 70% above peers
Levittown, NY 4.7% 5th -0.3pp 19th 52% below peers
Edina, MN 4.6% 4th -0.2pp 20th 52% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 9.7% 16th -0.4pp 21st on par with peers
Oak Park, IL 7.4% 11th -0.2pp 22nd 23% below peers
West New York, NJ 19.3% 30th -0.5pp 23rd 100% above peers
Placentia, CA 7.9% 13th -0.2pp 24th 18% below peers
Galveston, TX 20.1% 31st +1.6pp 25th 108% above peers
Grand Island, NE 15.0% 25th +2.4pp 26th 55% above peers
Burleson, TX 7.1% 9th +1.4pp 27th 26% below peers
Wheaton, MD 12.9% 23rd +2.8pp 28th 34% above peers
Novato, CA 9.6% 15th +2.7pp 29th 1% below peers
Minnetonka, MN 5.9% 6th +1.9pp 30th 39% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA 10.0% 18th +3.9pp 31st 4% above peers
Where is this changing? 17 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of people below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
4 of 17 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Apex, NC down 2.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Eagle Mountain, UT down 3.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Westfield, IN down 2.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.8pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Share of children below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Child poverty fell 5.4 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 7.6% to 2.2% - more than the combined survey margin (±3.0pp). 15 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the stronger third of similar-size cities and kept improving; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 20 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: child poverty fell 4.3 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (6.5% to 2.2%).
2.2%
20132024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Arizona ref 16.2% -5.3pp
United States ref 16.1%
Catalina Foothills, AZ 2.2% 1st -5.4pp 1st 79% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 3.6% 2nd -6.2pp 2nd 66% below peers
Westchester, FL 10.0% 13th -10.7pp 3rd 4% below peers
Columbus, IN 11.1% 17th -11.0pp 4th 7% above peers
Mooresville, NC 6.4% 9th -6.1pp 5th 38% below peers
Lincoln, CA 6.3% 7th -4.6pp 6th 40% below peers
Dunwoody, GA 6.4% 8th -4.4pp 7th 39% below peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 10.4% 16th -6.2pp 8th on par with peers
Cathedral City, CA 18.6% 23rd -10.5pp 9th 78% above peers
Placentia, CA 7.7% 11th -4.3pp 10th 26% below peers
Aloha, OR 10.2% 14th -5.7pp 11th 2% below peers
Battle Creek, MI 22.6% 27th -12.2pp 12th 117% above peers
Elyria, OH 26.1% 29th -13.1pp 13th 150% above peers
Aspen Hill, MD 10.4% 15th -4.2pp 14th on par with peers
Wake Forest, NC 4.0% 3rd -1.3pp 15th 62% below peers
Huntington Park, CA 25.8% 28th -8.7pp 16th 148% above peers
Joplin, MO 19.1% 26th -5.3pp 17th 83% above peers
Paramount, CA 18.6% 22nd -5.1pp 18th 78% above peers
Palm Desert, CA 15.5% 20th -3.3pp 19th 49% above peers
West New York, NJ 28.7% 30th -3.0pp 20th 175% above peers
Edina, MN 4.5% 4th -0.4pp 21st 57% below peers
Florissant, MO 18.4% 21st -0.0pp 22nd 77% above peers
Grand Island, NE 18.8% 25th +0.4pp 23rd 80% above peers
Burleson, TX 7.6% 10th +0.5pp 24th 27% below peers
Levittown, NY 5.6% 5th +0.5pp 25th 47% below peers
Wheaton, MD 18.6% 24th +3.0pp 26th 78% above peers
Galveston, TX 35.7% 31st +9.2pp 27th 242% above peers
Minnetonka, MN 5.7% 6th +2.5pp 28th 45% below peers
Novato, CA 13.4% 18th +6.3pp 29th 28% above peers
Diamond Bar, CA 13.6% 19th +7.2pp 30th 30% above peers
Oak Park, IL 8.6% 12th +4.9pp 31st 17% below peers
Where is this changing? 17 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of children below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
4 of 17 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Westfield, IN down 6.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Apex, NC down 4.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Eagle Mountain, UT down 6.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.4pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Households with a broadband internet subscription

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Broadband rose 5.9 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 90.8% to 96.8% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.5pp). 29 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the stronger third of similar-size cities and kept improving; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 29 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: broadband rose 7.2 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (89.6% to 96.8%).
96.8%
20172024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Arizona ref 91.7% +7.3pp
United States ref 91.1%
Huntington Park, CA 89.3% 28th +13.9pp 1st 5% below peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 96.2% 6th +13.9pp 2nd 2% above peers
Elyria, OH 87.0% 30th +11.6pp 3rd 8% below peers
Battle Creek, MI 90.6% 26th +11.8pp 4th 4% below peers
Paramount, CA 90.7% 25th +10.9pp 5th 4% below peers
Westchester, FL 91.4% 22nd +10.7pp 6th 3% below peers
Columbus, IN 94.3% 17th +9.9pp 7th on par with peers
Joplin, MO 88.6% 29th +9.2pp 8th 6% below peers
Galveston, TX 91.5% 21st +9.4pp 9th 3% below peers
Cathedral City, CA 91.4% 23rd +8.6pp 10th 3% below peers
West New York, NJ 87.0% 31st +8.1pp 11th 8% below peers
Mooresville, NC 96.9% 3rd +8.7pp 12th 3% above peers
Grand Island, NE 89.7% 27th +7.8pp 13th 5% below peers
Florissant, MO 92.7% 20th +7.0pp 14th 2% below peers
Oak Park, IL 94.4% 15th +6.7pp 15th on par with peers
Wheaton, MD 95.9% 9th +6.5pp 16th 2% above peers
Palm Desert, CA 91.3% 24th +6.1pp 17th 3% below peers
Burleson, TX 95.2% 12th +5.9pp 18th 1% above peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 96.8% 5th +5.9pp 19th 3% above peers
Aspen Hill, MD 94.3% 16th +5.0pp 20th on par with peers
Lincoln, CA 93.6% 18th +4.3pp 21st 1% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 98.4% 1st +4.5pp 22nd 4% above peers
Wake Forest, NC 98.1% 2nd +4.3pp 23rd 4% above peers
Edina, MN 93.4% 19th +4.0pp 24th 1% below peers
Minnetonka, MN 95.8% 10th +3.8pp 25th 2% above peers
Dunwoody, GA 96.8% 4th +3.3pp 26th 3% above peers
Levittown, NY 95.2% 13th +3.2pp 27th 1% above peers
Novato, CA 94.7% 14th +3.0pp 28th on par with peers
Aloha, OR 96.1% 7th +2.8pp 29th 2% above peers
Placentia, CA 95.4% 11th +2.4pp 30th 1% above peers
Diamond Bar, CA 96.1% 8th +2.1pp 31st 2% above peers
Where is this changing? 17 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds with a broadband internet subscription
Loading tract map…
4 of 17 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Wheaton, MD up 6.5pp between its surveys · a smaller real gain than 52% of this group · 2019-2024
  • South San Francisco, CA up 6.3pp between its surveys · a smaller real gain than 54% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Chino, CA up 6.0pp between its surveys · a smaller real gain than 56% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.1pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Income inequality (Gini index)

▼ Lower is better Improving (small)
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Inequality fell about 4% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 0.51 to 0.49 - more than the combined survey margin (±0.02). 1 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 5 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: inequality fell about 3% from 2014 to 2024 (0.50 to 0.49).
0.49
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Arizona ref 0.46 -0.003
United States ref 0.48 +0.001
Cathedral City, CA 0.46 19th -0.059 1st 1% above peers
Lincoln, CA 0.40 7th -0.017 2nd 10% below peers
Battle Creek, MI 0.45 16th -0.018 3rd on par with peers
Palm Desert, CA 0.51 29th -0.020 4th 14% above peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 0.49 27th -0.018 5th 9% above peers
Huntington Park, CA 0.41 10th -0.007 6th 8% below peers
Joplin, MO 0.48 24th -0.008 7th 6% above peers
Edina, MN 0.53 31st -0.008 8th 18% above peers
Aspen Hill, MD 0.42 12th -0.006 9th 6% below peers
Oak Park, IL 0.48 26th -0.006 10th 7% above peers
Wheaton, MD 0.41 8th -0.005 11th 9% below peers
Minnetonka, MN 0.47 23rd -0.006 12th 5% above peers
Mooresville, NC 0.42 11th -0.005 13th 7% below peers
Aloha, OR 0.36 3rd -0.002 14th 20% below peers
Levittown, NY 0.35 2nd +0.002 15th 21% below peers
Westchester, FL 0.44 14th +0.002 16th 2% below peers
Elyria, OH 0.45 15th +0.003 17th 1% below peers
Wake Forest, NC 0.39 5th +0.003 18th 13% below peers
Novato, CA 0.47 22nd +0.014 19th 4% above peers
Galveston, TX 0.52 30th +0.017 20th 17% above peers
Columbus, IN 0.46 20th +0.015 21st 2% above peers
Florissant, MO 0.38 4th +0.019 22nd 16% below peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 0.45 17th +0.024 23rd 1% above peers
Placentia, CA 0.42 13th +0.023 24th 6% below peers
Grand Island, NE 0.47 21st +0.030 25th 4% above peers
Diamond Bar, CA 0.45 18th +0.030 26th 1% above peers
Burleson, TX 0.40 6th +0.028 27th 12% below peers
Paramount, CA 0.41 9th +0.031 28th 9% below peers
West New York, NJ 0.51 28th +0.040 29th 13% above peers
Dunwoody, GA 0.48 25th +0.038 30th 7% above peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 0.33 1st +0.046 31st 27% below peers
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B19083) through 2024 ±0.01 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Households receiving SNAP

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

SNAP changed less than the survey can measure between the 2014-2018 and 2019-2023 surveys (2.2% then, 2.6% now; margin ±1.1pp).

Within the survey margin, 2014-2018 vs 2019-2023 surveys; 10 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: snap rose 0.9 percentage points from 2013 to 2023 (1.7% to 2.6%).
2.6%
20102023
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2019-2023 survey Today's rank Change2014-2018 → 2019-2023 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Arizona ref 10.1% -1.7pp
United States ref 11.8% -0.5pp
Grand Island, NE 9.4% 16th -4.1pp 1st on par with peers
Levittown, NY 2.9% 4th -1.1pp 2nd 69% below peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 17.6% 28th -4.6pp 3rd 88% above peers
Columbus, IN 7.5% 15th -1.9pp 4th 20% below peers
Burleson, TX 4.9% 7th -1.1pp 5th 48% below peers
Elyria, OH 16.0% 25th -3.3pp 6th 71% above peers
Battle Creek, MI 16.8% 26th -3.2pp 7th 80% above peers
Galveston, TX 13.0% 22nd -2.3pp 8th 39% above peers
West New York, NJ 18.0% 29th -2.7pp 9th 93% above peers
Westchester, FL 23.4% 30th -3.5pp 10th 150% above peers
Aloha, OR 12.1% 21st -1.8pp 11th 29% above peers
Joplin, MO 15.7% 24th -0.9pp 12th 67% above peers
Wake Forest, NC 5.8% 8th +0.0pp 13th 39% below peers
Minnetonka, MN 3.4% 5th +0.0pp 14th 64% below peers
Florissant, MO 9.9% 18th +0.4pp 15th 6% above peers
Paramount, CA 17.3% 27th +1.1pp 16th 85% above peers
Oak Park, IL 7.3% 14th +0.6pp 17th 23% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 10.8% 20th +0.9pp 18th 15% above peers
Wheaton, MD 10.4% 19th +0.9pp 19th 11% above peers
Dunwoody, GA 2.4% 1st +0.2pp 20th 74% below peers
Mooresville, NC 6.6% 11th +0.8pp 21st 29% below peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 2.6% 2nd +0.4pp 22nd 72% below peers
Huntington Park, CA 24.0% 31st +4.9pp 23rd 156% above peers
Edina, MN 2.7% 3rd +0.6pp 24th 71% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 5.8% 9th +1.2pp 25th 39% below peers
Placentia, CA 7.0% 13th +1.7pp 26th 26% below peers
Lincoln, CA 4.3% 6th +1.3pp 27th 54% below peers
Cathedral City, CA 13.7% 23rd +4.7pp 28th 46% above peers
Palm Desert, CA 9.4% 17th +4.4pp 29th 1% above peers
Diamond Bar, CA 6.2% 10th +3.4pp 30th 34% below peers
Novato, CA 6.8% 12th +3.7pp 31st 28% below peers
Where is this changing? 17 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2018 to 2023, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds receiving SNAP
Loading tract map…
4 of 17 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Queen Creek, AZ down 2.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2018-2023
  • El Dorado Hills, CA down 1.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2018-2023
  • South Jordan, UT down 1.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2018-2023
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2023 ±0.8pp at 90% confidence (2023 estimate) survey trend: 2014-2018 vs 2019-2023 surveys about this metric
See all Economy data →
Housing
Housing

Homeownership rate

▲ Higher is better Improving (small)
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Homeownership rose 2.7 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 73.8% to 76.4% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.2pp). 5 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 8 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: homeownership rose 4.4 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (72.1% to 76.5%).
76.4%
20112024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Arizona ref 67.4% +2.9pp
United States ref 65.2%
West New York, NJ 22.9% 31st +2.5pp 1st 65% below peers
Battle Creek, MI 66.0% 15th +6.4pp 2nd 1% above peers
Cathedral City, CA 66.5% 13th +5.7pp 3rd 2% above peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 71.0% 10th +5.3pp 4th 9% above peers
Galveston, TX 46.2% 28th +2.4pp 5th 29% below peers
Lincoln, CA 83.9% 3rd +4.2pp 6th 29% above peers
Paramount, CA 43.0% 29th +2.0pp 7th 34% below peers
Minnetonka, MN 71.6% 9th +2.6pp 8th 10% above peers
Wake Forest, NC 74.0% 6th +2.6pp 9th 13% above peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 76.5% 5th +2.7pp 10th 17% above peers
Palm Desert, CA 65.0% 17th +2.2pp 11th on par with peers
Florissant, MO 67.1% 11th +1.9pp 12th 3% above peers
Edina, MN 72.4% 7th +1.6pp 13th 11% above peers
Burleson, TX 72.1% 8th +1.5pp 14th 11% above peers
Diamond Bar, CA 77.3% 4th +1.3pp 15th 19% above peers
Dunwoody, GA 56.2% 26th +0.6pp 16th 14% below peers
Elyria, OH 60.0% 23rd +0.6pp 17th 8% below peers
Oak Park, IL 60.0% 22nd +0.5pp 18th 8% below peers
Mooresville, NC 58.3% 24th +0.1pp 19th 11% below peers
Wheaton, MD 64.6% 19th +0.1pp 20th 1% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 64.8% 18th -0.8pp 21st 1% below peers
Grand Island, NE 57.8% 25th -1.0pp 22nd 11% below peers
Levittown, NY 92.2% 1st -1.7pp 23rd 41% above peers
Columbus, IN 60.8% 21st -1.1pp 24th 7% below peers
Placentia, CA 63.6% 20th -1.7pp 25th 2% below peers
Novato, CA 66.1% 14th -2.0pp 26th 1% above peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 84.7% 2nd -2.8pp 27th 30% above peers
Westchester, FL 65.2% 16th -2.9pp 28th on par with peers
Aloha, OR 67.1% 12th -3.1pp 29th 3% above peers
Joplin, MO 53.4% 27th -4.3pp 30th 18% below peers
Huntington Park, CA 24.2% 30th -3.0pp 31st 63% below peers
Where is this changing? 17 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHomeownership rate
Loading tract map…
4 of 17 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.0pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Housing

Housing cost-burdened households

▼ Lower is better Turning down (early signal)
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Cost burden changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (25.4% then, 23.7% now; margin ±2.9pp). The newest releases lean downward: each of the last 12 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 7 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: cost burden fell 5.5 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (29.2% to 23.7%).
23.7%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Arizona ref 31.0% +0.3pp
United States ref 32.2% +0.4pp
Wheaton, MD 32.2% 17th -7.4pp 1st on par with peers
Aloha, OR 29.0% 8th -5.3pp 2nd 10% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 33.1% 18th -4.4pp 3rd 3% above peers
Huntington Park, CA 51.1% 31st -4.8pp 4th 59% above peers
Mooresville, NC 28.2% 6th -2.6pp 5th 12% below peers
Elyria, OH 30.2% 9th -2.4pp 6th 6% below peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 23.7% 2nd -1.6pp 7th 26% below peers
Cathedral City, CA 45.0% 26th -3.0pp 8th 40% above peers
Battle Creek, MI 32.0% 15th -1.7pp 9th on par with peers
Edina, MN 28.7% 7th -0.9pp 10th 11% below peers
Levittown, NY 33.4% 19th -1.1pp 11th 4% above peers
Paramount, CA 46.8% 29th -1.1pp 12th 46% above peers
Oak Park, IL 32.1% 16th -0.4pp 13th on par with peers
Westchester, FL 45.4% 27th -0.5pp 14th 41% above peers
Wake Forest, NC 22.5% 1st +0.0pp 15th 30% below peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 42.5% 22nd +0.3pp 16th 33% above peers
Florissant, MO 30.4% 11th +1.2pp 17th 5% below peers
Minnetonka, MN 27.7% 4th +1.1pp 18th 14% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 28.1% 5th +1.5pp 19th 12% below peers
Novato, CA 44.5% 25th +2.6pp 20th 39% above peers
Lincoln, CA 36.8% 20th +2.4pp 21st 15% above peers
Diamond Bar, CA 40.8% 21st +2.7pp 22nd 27% above peers
West New York, NJ 50.0% 30th +3.6pp 23rd 56% above peers
Dunwoody, GA 30.3% 10th +2.2pp 24th 6% below peers
Joplin, MO 31.7% 14th +2.6pp 25th 1% below peers
Columbus, IN 24.2% 3rd +2.0pp 26th 24% below peers
Palm Desert, CA 46.4% 28th +4.3pp 27th 45% above peers
Placentia, CA 43.0% 23rd +4.5pp 28th 34% above peers
Galveston, TX 43.7% 24th +4.6pp 29th 36% above peers
Grand Island, NE 30.6% 12th +5.4pp 30th 5% below peers
Burleson, TX 31.2% 13th +7.8pp 31st 3% below peers
Where is this changing? 17 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHousing cost-burdened households
Loading tract map…
4 of 17 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Tinley Park, IL down 4.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 97% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Appleton, WI down 3.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 96% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Decatur, IL down 3.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 93% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (tables B25070 + B25091) through 2024 ±2.0pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys *Early signal: consecutive releases agree on direction only; the size of the newest movement is not measurable from overlapping surveys. about this metric
Housing

Households without a vehicle

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

No vehicle changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (3.9% then, 3.0% now; margin ±1.2pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 3 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: no vehicle fell 0.3 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (3.4% to 3.0%).
3.0%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Arizona ref 5.4% -0.8pp
United States ref 8.3% -0.3pp
Mooresville, NC 2.8% 6th -1.6pp 1st 44% below peers
Dunwoody, GA 3.5% 11th -1.3pp 2nd 31% below peers
Palm Desert, CA 3.9% 12th -1.1pp 3rd 23% below peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 3.0% 8th -0.9pp 4th 40% below peers
Lincoln, CA 1.9% 2nd -0.5pp 5th 62% below peers
Minnetonka, MN 4.1% 13th -0.8pp 6th 19% below peers
Battle Creek, MI 10.7% 26th -1.9pp 7th 112% above peers
Oak Park, IL 11.7% 28th -1.7pp 8th 133% above peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 2.8% 5th -0.4pp 9th 45% below peers
Cathedral City, CA 5.0% 15th -0.6pp 10th on par with peers
Diamond Bar, CA 2.4% 4th -0.2pp 11th 53% below peers
Elyria, OH 8.9% 24th -0.9pp 12th 78% above peers
Galveston, TX 10.7% 27th -0.6pp 13th 112% above peers
West New York, NJ 40.0% 31st -0.3pp 14th 696% above peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 0.7% 1st +0.0pp 15th 86% below peers
Aloha, OR 4.2% 14th +0.2pp 16th 16% below peers
Florissant, MO 6.5% 20th +0.4pp 17th 30% above peers
Placentia, CA 2.9% 7th +0.2pp 18th 43% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 8.2% 23rd +0.5pp 19th 63% above peers
Edina, MN 6.5% 19th +0.4pp 20th 29% above peers
Joplin, MO 9.6% 25th +0.8pp 21st 91% above peers
Paramount, CA 5.5% 17th +0.5pp 22nd 9% above peers
Huntington Park, CA 14.3% 30th +1.4pp 23rd 185% above peers
Levittown, NY 3.3% 10th +0.4pp 24th 35% below peers
Novato, CA 5.0% 16th +0.7pp 25th on par with peers
Wake Forest, NC 3.2% 9th +0.4pp 26th 37% below peers
Columbus, IN 6.0% 18th +1.3pp 27th 20% above peers
Westchester, FL 6.9% 21st +1.8pp 28th 36% above peers
Wheaton, MD 12.1% 29th +3.2pp 29th 141% above peers
Grand Island, NE 7.3% 22nd +2.2pp 30th 45% above peers
Burleson, TX 2.1% 3rd +0.7pp 31st 57% below peers
Where is this changing? 17 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHouseholds without a vehicle
Loading tract map…
4 of 17 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Apopka, FL down 2.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Sandy, UT down 1.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Mount Pleasant, SC down 1.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B08201) through 2024 ±0.8pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Housing data →
Health
Health

People without health insurance

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (2.8% then, 3.5% now; margin ±0.9pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 13 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: uninsured fell 2.9 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (6.3% to 3.5%).
3.5%
20122024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Arizona ref 10.1% +0.2pp
United States ref 8.2% -0.4pp
Minnetonka, MN 1.3% 1st -1.1pp 1st 83% below peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 8.0% 17th -6.3pp 2nd 3% above peers
Diamond Bar, CA 3.4% 6th -2.4pp 3rd 56% below peers
Westchester, FL 9.4% 22nd -4.5pp 4th 22% above peers
Columbus, IN 5.6% 12th -2.3pp 5th 27% below peers
Lincoln, CA 2.5% 3rd -1.0pp 6th 68% below peers
Cathedral City, CA 9.1% 20th -3.5pp 7th 18% above peers
Edina, MN 1.7% 2nd -0.5pp 8th 78% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 6.7% 15th -2.0pp 9th 13% below peers
Levittown, NY 2.5% 4th -0.4pp 10th 68% below peers
Palm Desert, CA 5.5% 11th -0.8pp 11th 29% below peers
Elyria, OH 6.7% 14th -0.9pp 12th 14% below peers
Galveston, TX 15.9% 29th -1.9pp 13th 106% above peers
Florissant, MO 8.2% 18th -0.7pp 14th 6% above peers
Battle Creek, MI 5.2% 10th -0.3pp 15th 32% below peers
Oak Park, IL 3.0% 5th -0.1pp 16th 60% below peers
West New York, NJ 21.4% 31st +0.0pp 17th 177% above peers
Burleson, TX 10.6% 23rd +0.0pp 18th 38% above peers
Mooresville, NC 7.7% 16th +0.0pp 19th on par with peers
Huntington Park, CA 17.9% 30th +0.5pp 20th 132% above peers
Placentia, CA 6.4% 13th +0.3pp 21st 17% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 13.6% 25th +0.6pp 22nd 77% above peers
Joplin, MO 11.6% 24th +0.5pp 23rd 50% above peers
Wheaton, MD 14.3% 26th +1.4pp 24th 86% above peers
Grand Island, NE 14.3% 27th +1.8pp 25th 86% above peers
Wake Forest, NC 4.7% 8th +0.7pp 26th 39% below peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 3.5% 7th +0.6pp 27th 55% below peers
Aloha, OR 8.7% 19th +2.0pp 28th 12% above peers
Paramount, CA 15.1% 28th +3.6pp 29th 96% above peers
Novato, CA 4.8% 9th +1.3pp 30th 37% below peers
Dunwoody, GA 9.4% 21st +2.9pp 31st 22% above peers
Where is this changing? 17 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthPeople without health insurance
Loading tract map…
4 of 17 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Mountain View, CA down 2.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Brookline, MA down 1.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Minnetonka, MN down 1.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.7pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Health

Adult obesity

▼ Lower is better Level only
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Adult obesity is somewhat below the peer median.

26.3%
20202022
Compare all 31 similar-size cities best first
Place Latest Today's rank History Latest vs. peers
Arizona ref 33.5%
United States ref 33.4%
Diamond Bar, CA 17.6% 1st 44% below peers
Edina, MN 23.8% 2nd 25% below peers
Minnetonka, MN 24.8% 3rd 22% below peers
Dunwoody, GA 25.0% 4th 21% below peers
Novato, CA 25.3% 5th 20% below peers
Wake Forest, NC 25.8% 6th 19% below peers
Placentia, CA 26.0% 7th 18% below peers
Levittown, NY 26.2% 8th 17% below peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 26.3% 9th 17% below peers
Lincoln, CA 26.6% 10th 16% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 27.0% 11th 15% below peers
Wheaton, MD 27.4% 12th 14% below peers
Westchester, FL 28.7% 13th 9% below peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 29.0% 14th 9% below peers
Oak Park, IL 29.3% 15th 8% below peers
Mooresville, NC 31.7% 16th on par with peers
Paramount, CA 31.8% 17th on par with peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 31.8% 18th on par with peers
Aloha, OR 32.5% 19th 3% above peers
Palm Desert, CA 32.6% 20th 3% above peers
Huntington Park, CA 33.4% 21st 5% above peers
Columbus, IN 34.1% 22nd 8% above peers
West New York, NJ 34.9% 23rd 10% above peers
Cathedral City, CA 35.8% 24th 13% above peers
Joplin, MO 36.4% 25th 15% above peers
Florissant, MO 37.4% 26th 18% above peers
Burleson, TX 38.2% 27th 21% above peers
Grand Island, NE 38.3% 28th 21% above peers
Battle Creek, MI 40.3% 29th 27% above peers
Elyria, OH 42.5% 30th 34% above peers
Galveston, TX 43.1% 31st 36% above peers
CDC PLACES through 2022 modeled tract map about this metric
Health

Children without health insurance

▼ Lower is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Child uninsured rose 3.5 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 1.9% to 5.4% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.2pp). That reverses the previous span, which went down between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys. 6 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 10 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: child uninsured rose 1.6 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (3.8% to 5.4%).
5.4%
20122024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Arizona ref 8.8% +0.6pp
United States ref 5.5% +0.4pp
Columbus, IN 1.5% 2nd -6.1pp 1st 66% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA 2.0% 4th -2.6pp 2nd 55% below peers
Cathedral City, CA 3.0% 14th -3.8pp 3rd 34% below peers
Minnetonka, MN 1.0% 1st -1.1pp 4th 77% below peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 2.9% 12th -2.9pp 5th 37% below peers
Lincoln, CA 2.1% 6th -1.0pp 6th 54% below peers
Palm Desert, CA 2.5% 9th -1.1pp 7th 45% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 5.6% 21st -2.1pp 8th 24% above peers
Elyria, OH 2.6% 10th -0.5pp 9th 42% below peers
Joplin, MO 4.1% 15th -0.6pp 10th 9% below peers
Levittown, NY 2.1% 5th -0.3pp 11th 55% below peers
Edina, MN 1.9% 3rd -0.2pp 12th 58% below peers
Mooresville, NC 2.3% 8th -0.3pp 13th 49% below peers
Burleson, TX 7.0% 26th -0.1pp 14th 55% above peers
Galveston, TX 11.2% 31st -0.1pp 15th 147% above peers
Placentia, CA 2.9% 13th +0.1pp 16th 36% below peers
Grand Island, NE 6.7% 24th +0.4pp 17th 48% above peers
Aspen Hill, MD 6.6% 23rd +0.5pp 18th 46% above peers
Westchester, FL 5.5% 20th +0.9pp 19th 21% above peers
Aloha, OR 5.5% 19th +0.9pp 20th 21% above peers
Florissant, MO 8.1% 29th +2.8pp 21st 78% above peers
Huntington Park, CA 8.0% 28th +3.0pp 22nd 76% above peers
Dunwoody, GA 6.3% 22nd +2.7pp 23rd 40% above peers
Oak Park, IL 2.7% 11th +1.2pp 24th 41% below peers
Wake Forest, NC 2.2% 7th +1.0pp 25th 50% below peers
Wheaton, MD 7.0% 25th +3.2pp 26th 54% above peers
Battle Creek, MI 4.7% 17th +2.2pp 27th 4% above peers
West New York, NJ 10.3% 30th +4.9pp 28th 128% above peers
Paramount, CA 7.7% 27th +3.8pp 29th 70% above peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 5.4% 18th +3.5pp 30th 19% above peers
Novato, CA 4.5% 16th +3.4pp 31st on par with peers
Where is this changing? 17 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthChildren without health insurance
Loading tract map…
4 of 17 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Newport Beach, CA down 1.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Royal Oak, MI down 1.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Troy, NY down 1.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 97% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B27001) through 2024 ±2.0pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Health data →
Education
Education

Adults with a bachelor's degree or higher

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

College attainment rose 3.7 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 67.8% to 71.4% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.8pp). 17 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the stronger third of similar-size cities and kept improving; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 17 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: college attainment rose 8.8 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (62.6% to 71.4%).
71.4%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Arizona ref 33.3% +3.9pp
United States ref 35.7% +3.5pp
Huntington Park, CA 8.5% 31st +2.1pp 1st 78% below peers
Paramount, CA 14.9% 30th +3.6pp 2nd 61% below peers
Burleson, TX 34.0% 20th +7.6pp 3rd 12% below peers
Galveston, TX 36.0% 18th +6.8pp 4th 7% below peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 31.6% 22nd +4.7pp 5th 18% below peers
Lincoln, CA 40.0% 13th +5.8pp 6th 4% above peers
Elyria, OH 17.8% 29th +2.3pp 7th 54% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 37.8% 17th +4.9pp 8th 2% below peers
Levittown, NY 38.6% 16th +4.5pp 9th on par with peers
Cathedral City, CA 24.5% 25th +2.8pp 10th 37% below peers
Mooresville, NC 45.5% 9th +5.3pp 11th 18% above peers
Placentia, CA 44.2% 10th +4.9pp 12th 15% above peers
Aloha, OR 34.5% 19th +3.4pp 13th 10% below peers
West New York, NJ 33.5% 21st +3.3pp 14th 13% below peers
Palm Desert, CA 40.7% 12th +3.8pp 15th 5% above peers
Wake Forest, NC 59.5% 6th +4.9pp 16th 54% above peers
Wheaton, MD 38.7% 15th +3.1pp 17th on par with peers
Minnetonka, MN 65.0% 5th +4.8pp 18th 69% above peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 71.4% 4th +3.7pp 19th 85% above peers
Novato, CA 48.9% 8th +2.4pp 20th 27% above peers
Edina, MN 72.7% 1st +2.9pp 21st 88% above peers
Westchester, FL 30.2% 23rd +1.1pp 22nd 22% below peers
Oak Park, IL 72.5% 2nd +2.5pp 23rd 88% above peers
Grand Island, NE 20.9% 28th +0.3pp 24th 46% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 43.3% 11th +0.3pp 25th 12% above peers
Joplin, MO 26.6% 24th +0.2pp 26th 31% below peers
Battle Creek, MI 21.9% 27th +0.0pp 27th 43% below peers
Dunwoody, GA 72.2% 3rd -0.1pp 28th 87% above peers
Columbus, IN 40.0% 14th -1.3pp 29th 4% above peers
Diamond Bar, CA 52.8% 7th -2.1pp 30th 37% above peers
Florissant, MO 22.4% 26th -1.5pp 31st 42% below peers
Where is this changing? 17 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationAdults with a bachelor's degree or higher
Loading tract map…
4 of 17 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Leander, TX up 12.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 95% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Grapevine, TX up 9.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 87% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Lakewood, OH up 8.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 85% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.6pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Education

Children ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool

▲ Higher is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Preschool enrollment changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (70.6% then, 60.6% now; margin ±15.6pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 8 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: preschool enrollment fell 12.9 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (73.5% to 60.6%).
60.6%
20112024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Arizona ref 35.0% -3.9pp
United States ref 45.5%
Placentia, CA 60.8% 5th +21.8pp 1st 25% above peers
Wheaton, MD 50.5% 14th +15.9pp 2nd 4% above peers
Grand Island, NE 45.6% 19th +13.3pp 3rd 6% below peers
Columbus, IN 48.5% 17th +6.2pp 4th 1% below peers
Novato, CA 67.7% 1st +8.4pp 5th 39% above peers
Palm Desert, CA 59.4% 7th +6.5pp 6th 22% above peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 42.6% 22nd +4.7pp 7th 13% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 33.9% 28th +3.6pp 8th 31% below peers
Elyria, OH 48.8% 16th +3.8pp 9th on par with peers
Lincoln, CA 48.8% 15th +0.3pp 10th on par with peers
West New York, NJ 64.8% 3rd -0.0pp 11th 33% above peers
Mooresville, NC 47.9% 18th -1.4pp 12th 2% below peers
Aloha, OR 34.4% 27th -2.5pp 13th 29% below peers
Paramount, CA 36.3% 25th -2.8pp 14th 26% below peers
Battle Creek, MI 35.2% 26th -3.0pp 15th 28% below peers
Westchester, FL 56.4% 10th -5.6pp 16th 16% above peers
Huntington Park, CA 41.3% 24th -4.3pp 17th 15% below peers
Dunwoody, GA 52.8% 12th -6.2pp 18th 8% above peers
Edina, MN 66.6% 2nd -7.9pp 19th 37% above peers
Galveston, TX 43.5% 21st -5.4pp 20th 11% below peers
Florissant, MO 52.9% 11th -7.7pp 21st 8% above peers
Wake Forest, NC 52.6% 13th -7.7pp 22nd 8% above peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 60.6% 6th -10.0pp 23rd 24% above peers
Cathedral City, CA 29.5% 29th -5.6pp 24th 40% below peers
Oak Park, IL 62.2% 4th -13.3pp 25th 28% above peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 56.7% 9th -12.4pp 26th 16% above peers
Levittown, NY 58.5% 8th -15.7pp 27th 20% above peers
Joplin, MO 21.9% 31st -8.0pp 28th 55% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA 45.1% 20th -20.2pp 29th 7% below peers
Burleson, TX 24.3% 30th -19.2pp 30th 50% below peers
Minnetonka, MN 41.7% 23rd -36.0pp 31st 14% below peers
Where is this changing? 17 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationChildren ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool
Loading tract map…
5 of 17 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Vineland, NJ up 20.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 94% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Livermore, CA up 16.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 92% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Brookhaven, GA up 18.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 91% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±12.2pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Education

Teens not in school and not working

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Disconnected youth changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (3.3% then, 0.0% now; margin ±6.3pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 2 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: disconnected youth fell 0.4 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (0.4% to 0.0%).
0.0%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Arizona ref 8.2% -0.2pp
United States ref 6.9% +0.3pp
Catalina Foothills, AZ 0.0% 1st -3.3pp 1st 100% below peers
Westchester, FL 4.0% 10th -9.9pp 2nd 40% below peers
Palm Desert, CA 4.5% 11th -7.3pp 3rd 34% below peers
Levittown, NY 2.7% 6th -4.4pp 4th 60% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 3.6% 9th -2.9pp 5th 46% below peers
Paramount, CA 7.1% 18th -5.6pp 6th 5% above peers
Oak Park, IL 1.3% 2nd -0.9pp 7th 81% below peers
Novato, CA 4.7% 12th -3.3pp 8th 31% below peers
Lincoln, CA 3.6% 8th -2.3pp 9th 47% below peers
Dunwoody, GA 2.0% 3rd -0.7pp 10th 71% below peers
Columbus, IN 8.8% 22nd -1.1pp 11th 30% above peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 7.6% 20th -1.0pp 12th 12% above peers
Cathedral City, CA 12.1% 25th -0.9pp 13th 79% above peers
Aloha, OR 6.3% 14th -0.2pp 14th 7% below peers
Burleson, TX 14.2% 27th +0.1pp 15th 110% above peers
Mooresville, NC 7.1% 17th +0.5pp 16th 5% above peers
Joplin, MO 5.2% 13th +0.8pp 17th 23% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 7.3% 19th +1.2pp 18th 8% above peers
Elyria, OH 18.2% 30th +3.6pp 19th 169% above peers
Grand Island, NE 6.7% 15th +1.8pp 20th 1% below peers
Florissant, MO 16.6% 29th +4.7pp 21st 145% above peers
Galveston, TX 10.2% 23rd +3.2pp 22nd 50% above peers
Huntington Park, CA 14.2% 28th +5.0pp 23rd 110% above peers
Minnetonka, MN 2.6% 5th +1.0pp 24th 61% below peers
Battle Creek, MI 13.1% 26th +5.9pp 25th 94% above peers
Edina, MN 3.3% 7th +1.5pp 26th 52% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA 2.3% 4th +1.1pp 27th 66% below peers
Wheaton, MD 10.4% 24th +5.0pp 28th 53% above peers
Placentia, CA 6.8% 16th +3.9pp 29th on par with peers
West New York, NJ 23.0% 31st +13.5pp 30th 240% above peers
Wake Forest, NC 8.2% 21st +6.7pp 31st 21% above peers
Where is this changing? 17 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationTeens not in school and not working
Loading tract map…
4 of 17 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B14005) through 2024 ±4.3pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Education data →
Demographics
Demographics

Population

No better direction Turning up (early signal)
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Population changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (50,454 then, 52,593 now; margin ±2,295). The newest releases lean upward: each of the last 3 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 25 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: population rose about 4% from 2014 to 2024 (50,643 to 52,593).
52,593
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Westchester, FL 52,032 25th +75% 1st 1% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 53,290 4th +64% 2nd 1% above peers
Mooresville, NC 52,381 21st +38% 3rd on par with peers
Wake Forest, NC 52,844 14th +25% 4th on par with peers
Burleson, TX 52,918 12th +15% 5th 1% above peers
Lincoln, CA 52,956 10th +12% 6th 1% above peers
Columbus, IN 51,824 29th +8% 7th 2% below peers
Galveston, TX 53,424 1st +6% 8th 2% above peers
Wheaton, MD 52,926 11th +5% 9th 1% above peers
Dunwoody, GA 51,758 31st +5% 10th 2% below peers
Joplin, MO 52,593 17th +4% 11th on par with peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 52,593 18th +4% 12th on par with peers
Grand Island, NE 52,884 13th +3% 13th on par with peers
Edina, MN 53,262 6th +3% 14th 1% above peers
Battle Creek, MI 52,374 22nd +2% 15th on par with peers
Oak Park, IL 53,292 3rd +2% 16th 1% above peers
Placentia, CA 52,826 15th +2% 17th on par with peers
Florissant, MO 51,773 30th +1% 18th 2% below peers
Levittown, NY 51,904 28th +1% 19th 1% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 53,279 5th +0% 20th 1% above peers
Minnetonka, MN 53,064 8th +0% 21st 1% above peers
Palm Desert, CA 51,990 27th -1% 22nd 1% below peers
West New York, NJ 52,004 26th -1% 23rd 1% below peers
Elyria, OH 53,035 9th -1% 24th 1% above peers
Aloha, OR 52,389 20th -3% 25th on par with peers
Cathedral City, CA 52,267 23rd -4% 26th 1% below peers
Paramount, CA 52,050 24th -5% 27th 1% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA 53,355 2nd -5% 28th 1% above peers
Novato, CA 52,546 19th -6% 29th on par with peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 52,622 16th -6% 30th on par with peers
Huntington Park, CA 53,108 7th -9% 31st 1% above peers
Where is this changing? 17 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsPopulation
Loading tract map…
4 of 17 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1,988 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys *Early signal: consecutive releases agree on direction only; the size of the newest movement is not measurable from overlapping surveys. about this metric
Demographics

Children's share of the population

No better direction No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Children changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (16.7% then, 15.6% now; margin ±1.8pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 14 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: children fell 1.0 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (16.6% to 15.6%).
15.6%
20172024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Arizona ref 21.1% -1.3pp
United States ref 21.6% -0.7pp
Novato, CA 20.5% 22nd +1.8pp 1st 8% below peers
Minnetonka, MN 21.4% 19th +1.1pp 2nd 5% below peers
Levittown, NY 20.5% 23rd +1.0pp 3rd 8% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 25.6% 5th +1.0pp 4th 14% above peers
Lincoln, CA 23.0% 14th +0.7pp 5th 3% above peers
Burleson, TX 28.8% 2nd +0.9pp 6th 29% above peers
Grand Island, NE 28.2% 3rd +0.2pp 7th 26% above peers
Columbus, IN 23.8% 12th -0.1pp 8th 6% above peers
Placentia, CA 23.2% 13th -0.2pp 9th 4% above peers
Oak Park, IL 23.9% 11th -0.4pp 10th 7% above peers
Battle Creek, MI 24.9% 7th -0.6pp 11th 11% above peers
Elyria, OH 21.9% 18th -0.8pp 12th 2% below peers
Edina, MN 22.4% 16th -1.1pp 13th on par with peers
Diamond Bar, CA 19.0% 26th -1.1pp 14th 15% below peers
Dunwoody, GA 24.6% 9th -1.5pp 15th 10% above peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 15.6% 27th -1.1pp 16th 31% below peers
West New York, NJ 19.5% 25th -1.4pp 17th 13% below peers
Joplin, MO 20.9% 20th -1.6pp 18th 7% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 43.4% 1st -3.4pp 19th 94% above peers
Mooresville, NC 24.3% 10th -1.9pp 20th 8% above peers
Wheaton, MD 22.5% 15th -2.1pp 21st on par with peers
Palm Desert, CA 12.8% 31st -1.6pp 22nd 43% below peers
Huntington Park, CA 24.7% 8th -3.4pp 23rd 10% above peers
Florissant, MO 22.3% 17th -3.1pp 24th on par with peers
Paramount, CA 25.1% 6th -3.5pp 25th 12% above peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 15.2% 28th -2.1pp 26th 32% below peers
Wake Forest, NC 26.5% 4th -4.0pp 27th 18% above peers
Galveston, TX 14.8% 29th -2.4pp 28th 34% below peers
Cathedral City, CA 20.0% 24th -3.2pp 29th 11% below peers
Aloha, OR 20.5% 21st -4.2pp 30th 8% below peers
Westchester, FL 13.4% 30th -2.7pp 31st 40% below peers
Where is this changing? 17 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren's share of the population
Loading tract map…
4 of 17 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.5pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Children in single-parent families

No better direction No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Single-parent changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (19.1% then, 14.3% now; margin ±5.3pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 5 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: single-parent fell 1.2 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (15.5% to 14.3%).
14.3%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Arizona ref 31.4% -0.6pp
United States ref 29.9% -0.2pp
Diamond Bar, CA 20.8% 22nd +5.0pp 1st 17% below peers
Oak Park, IL 22.7% 20th +5.5pp 2nd 9% below peers
Edina, MN 15.1% 28th +3.5pp 3rd 40% below peers
Joplin, MO 40.9% 7th +9.4pp 4th 63% above peers
Novato, CA 23.8% 19th +5.2pp 5th 5% below peers
Palm Desert, CA 37.2% 9th +7.9pp 6th 48% above peers
Huntington Park, CA 51.4% 1st +7.2pp 7th 105% above peers
Westchester, FL 35.7% 11th +3.5pp 8th 42% above peers
Dunwoody, GA 18.8% 23rd +1.6pp 9th 25% below peers
Paramount, CA 36.1% 10th +2.9pp 10th 44% above peers
West New York, NJ 42.1% 6th +2.8pp 11th 68% above peers
Florissant, MO 47.6% 4th +1.2pp 12th 90% above peers
Mooresville, NC 24.0% 18th +0.6pp 13th 4% below peers
Columbus, IN 27.8% 14th +0.0pp 14th 11% above peers
Galveston, TX 42.9% 5th -0.8pp 15th 71% above peers
Wheaton, MD 31.2% 13th -1.1pp 16th 24% above peers
Aloha, OR 25.1% 16th -1.0pp 17th on par with peers
Battle Creek, MI 49.1% 3rd -2.3pp 18th 96% above peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 33.2% 12th -1.7pp 19th 33% above peers
Lincoln, CA 16.6% 26th -1.0pp 20th 34% below peers
Grand Island, NE 38.2% 8th -4.4pp 21st 52% above peers
Elyria, OH 49.9% 2nd -7.7pp 22nd 99% above peers
Placentia, CA 18.5% 24th -3.2pp 23rd 26% below peers
Levittown, NY 9.5% 30th -2.1pp 24th 62% below peers
Wake Forest, NC 17.5% 25th -4.5pp 25th 30% below peers
Cathedral City, CA 26.3% 15th -7.3pp 26th 5% above peers
Minnetonka, MN 16.2% 27th -4.7pp 27th 36% below peers
Burleson, TX 22.5% 21st -7.2pp 28th 10% below peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 14.3% 29th -4.8pp 29th 43% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 24.4% 17th -9.0pp 30th 2% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 6.5% 31st -4.0pp 31st 74% below peers
Where is this changing? 17 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren in single-parent families
Loading tract map…
4 of 17 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B09002) through 2024 ±2.8pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Young children with all parents in the labor force

No better direction Rising
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Working parents rose 13.5 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 61.2% to 74.6% - more than the combined survey margin (±13.4pp). 6 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.

Rising beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 8 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: working parents rose 14.0 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (60.6% to 74.6%).
74.6%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Arizona ref 64.7% +3.0pp
United States ref 68.1% +1.9pp
Dunwoody, GA 78.7% 7th +25.5pp 1st 9% above peers
Palm Desert, CA 66.5% 23rd +16.4pp 2nd 8% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA 72.6% 14th +15.1pp 3rd 1% above peers
Aloha, OR 72.3% 15th +13.7pp 4th on par with peers
Joplin, MO 73.6% 13th +13.7pp 5th 2% above peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 74.6% 10th +13.5pp 6th 3% above peers
Novato, CA 69.8% 17th +12.0pp 7th 3% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 49.8% 31st +8.6pp 8th 31% below peers
Columbus, IN 67.7% 21st +11.3pp 9th 6% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 82.2% 2nd +13.4pp 10th 14% above peers
Wake Forest, NC 68.0% 20th +10.2pp 11th 6% below peers
Oak Park, IL 79.5% 5th +10.1pp 12th 10% above peers
Cathedral City, CA 64.8% 26th +7.6pp 13th 10% below peers
West New York, NJ 63.3% 27th +7.1pp 14th 12% below peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 82.0% 3rd +9.0pp 15th 14% above peers
Burleson, TX 72.2% 16th +6.5pp 16th on par with peers
Elyria, OH 67.5% 22nd +3.0pp 17th 6% below peers
Battle Creek, MI 74.2% 12th +3.0pp 18th 3% above peers
Huntington Park, CA 68.6% 19th +2.5pp 19th 5% below peers
Lincoln, CA 66.0% 24th +1.8pp 20th 8% below peers
Placentia, CA 69.4% 18th +1.8pp 21st 4% below peers
Paramount, CA 60.9% 29th +1.5pp 22nd 16% below peers
Wheaton, MD 74.7% 9th +1.7pp 23rd 3% above peers
Minnetonka, MN 78.9% 6th +1.7pp 24th 9% above peers
Florissant, MO 83.5% 1st +1.6pp 25th 16% above peers
Mooresville, NC 65.6% 25th -0.5pp 26th 9% below peers
Westchester, FL 81.7% 4th -1.1pp 27th 13% above peers
Grand Island, NE 75.0% 8th -3.0pp 28th 4% above peers
Levittown, NY 74.5% 11th -3.0pp 29th 3% above peers
Edina, MN 63.1% 28th -10.5pp 30th 13% below peers
Galveston, TX 56.9% 30th -17.9pp 31st 21% below peers
Where is this changing? 17 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsYoung children with all parents in the labor force
Loading tract map…
5 of 17 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B23008) through 2024 ±11.7pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Demographics data →