DataWorks Commons
Eagle Mountain, UT
← All cities

Eagle Mountain, UT

See all data for this place →
53,290 people (2024) 50k-100k West

Bright spots 9 indicators

Where Eagle Mountain, UT shows a real improvement in recent years, or stands clearly ahead of its peers. How this is calculated →
Child poverty
Share of children below the poverty level
3.6%
2020-24
▼ 63%
relative change
9.7% in 2019
Real improvement Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Poverty
Share of people below the poverty level
3.6%
2020-24
▼ 52%
relative change
7.4% in 2019
Real improvement Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Household income
Median household income
$113,648
2020-24
▲ 36%
relative change
$83,290 in 2019
Real improvement Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Uninsured
People without health insurance
6.7%
2020-24
▼ 23%
relative change
8.7% in 2019
Real improvement Trailing peers
Learn more ↓
College attainment
Adults with a bachelor's degree or higher
37.8%
2020-24
▲ 15%
relative change
32.9% in 2019
Real improvement Trailing peers
Learn more ↓
Broadband
Households with a broadband internet subscription
98.4%
2020-24
▲ 5%
relative change
93.9% in 2019
Real improvement Leading peers
Learn more ↓
No vehicle
Households without a vehicle
0.7%
2020-24
▲ 1%
relative change
0.7% in 2019
No measurable change Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Cost burden
Housing cost-burdened households
28.1%
2020-24
▲ 6%
relative change
26.6% in 2019
No measurable change Leading peers
Learn more ↓
SNAP
Households receiving SNAP
5.8%
2019-23
▲ 27%
relative change
4.5% in 2018
No measurable change Leading peers
Learn more ↓

What needs attention 4 indicators

Where Eagle Mountain, UT shows a real worsening in recent years, or trails its peers clearly. How this is calculated →
Inequality
Income inequality (Gini index)
0.33
2020-24
▲ 16%
relative change
0.28 in 2019
Worsening Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Child uninsured
Children without health insurance
5.6%
2020-24
▼ 28%
relative change
7.8% in 2019
No measurable change Trailing peers
Learn more ↓
Preschool enrollment
Children ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool
42.6%
2020-24
▲ 12%
relative change
37.9% in 2019
No measurable change Trailing peers
Learn more ↓
Homeownership
Homeownership rate
84.7%
2020-24
▼ 3%
relative change
87.5% in 2019
Turning down (early signal) Leading peers
Learn more ↓

Big shifts 6 indicators

Real moves and big gaps, where neither direction is simply good or bad. Biggest relative change first; big-gap cards come last. How this is calculated →
Population
53,290
2020-24
▲ 64%
relative change
32,412 in 2019
Rising Among the lowest of peers
Learn more ↓
Children
Children's share of the population
43.4%
2020-24
▼ 7%
relative change
46.8% in 2019
Falling Among the highest of peers
Learn more ↓
Rent
Typical asking rent
$2,265
Jun 2026
▲ 3%
relative change
$2,201 a year earlier
Rising recently Among the highest of peers
Learn more ↓
Starter homes
Starter home value (bottom tier)
$421,900
Jun 2026
flat
relative change
$421,827 a year earlier
Rising Among the highest of peers
Learn more ↓
Single-parent
Children in single-parent families
6.5%
2020-24
▼ 38%
relative change
10.4% in 2019
No measurable change Among the lowest of peers
Learn more ↓
Working parents
Young children with all parents in the labor force
49.8%
2020-24
▲ 21%
relative change
41.2% in 2019
No measurable change Among the lowest of peers
Learn more ↓

All indicators

Economy
Economy

Median household income

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Household income rose about 36% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from $83,290 to $113,648 (each survey's own dollars, not adjusted for inflation) - more than the combined survey margin (±$4,533). 28 of the 29 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started mid-pack and has reached a genuinely better level; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 28 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: household income rose about 67% from 2014 to 2024 ($68,091 to $113,648).
$113,648
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Utah ref $95,166 +33%
United States ref $80,734 +28%
Pensacola, FL $74,212 18th +47% 1st 21% below peers
Huntington Park, CA $59,996 26th +41% 2nd 36% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT $113,648 8th +36% 3rd 21% above peers
Wake Forest, NC $123,802 2nd +34% 4th 32% above peers
Colton, CA $71,208 20th +32% 5th 24% below peers
Battle Creek, MI $55,693 27th +32% 6th 41% below peers
Aloha, OR $101,934 15th +30% 7th 9% above peers
Wheaton, MD $111,478 12th +30% 8th 19% above peers
Mooresville, NC $89,647 17th +30% 9th 5% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD $111,575 11th +28% 10th 19% above peers
Pinellas Park, FL $63,432 23rd +28% 11th 32% below peers
Lincoln, CA $111,990 10th +26% 12th 19% above peers
Elkhart, IN $51,028 31st +25% 13th 46% below peers
Minnetonka, MN $119,517 4th +25% 14th 27% above peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ $115,304 7th +24% 15th 23% above peers
Elyria, OH $54,945 29th +24% 16th 42% below peers
Edina, MN $128,767 1st +24% 17th 37% above peers
Placentia, CA $115,929 5th +21% 18th 23% above peers
Kendale Lakes, FL $71,621 19th +21% 19th 24% below peers
Twin Falls, ID $61,205 24th +21% 20th 35% below peers
Manhattan, KS $60,172 25th +19% 21st 36% below peers
Burleson, TX $93,928 16th +18% 22nd on par with peers
Oak Park, IL $110,820 13th +17% 23rd 18% above peers
Wheaton, IL $120,008 3rd +16% 24th 28% above peers
Grand Island, NE $63,795 22nd +16% 25th 32% below peers
Joplin, MO $52,097 30th +15% 26th 45% below peers
Novato, CA $115,736 6th +14% 27th 23% above peers
Galveston, TX $55,631 28th +13% 28th 41% below peers
Normal, IL $64,785 21st +11% 29th 31% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA $108,281 14th +9% 30th 15% above peers
Methuen, MA $113,310 9th 21% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 6 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyMedian household income
Loading tract map…
6 of 6 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Bozeman, MT up about 54% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Malden, MA up about 52% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Plainfield, NJ up about 52% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±$3,322 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Unemployment rate

▼ Lower is better Worsening, faster than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Unemployment rose about 0.6 percentage points a year from 2022 to 2025. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening faster than 100% of similar-size cities over 2022-2025.
Longer view: unemployment rose less than 0.1 percentage points a year from 2015 to 2025.
Most recent monthly reading: 3.8% in May 2026, up from 3.6% a year earlier.
3.8%
2010May 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 26 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Utah ref 3.7% (May 26) +0.2pp
United States ref 4.2% (Jun 26) +0.1pp
Elyria, OH 3.4% (May 26) 5th -1.2pp 1st 11% below peers
Elkhart, IN 3.5% (May 26) 6th -1.0pp 2nd 8% below peers
Colton, CA 4.6% (May 26) 21st -0.8pp 3rd 21% above peers
Joplin, MO 3.6% (May 26) 8th -0.5pp 4th 5% below peers
Lincoln, CA 3.7% (May 26) 10th -0.4pp 5th 3% below peers
Grand Island, NE 2.9% (May 26) 1st -0.3pp 6th 24% below peers
Novato, CA 3.7% (May 26) 11th -0.3pp 7th 3% below peers
Wake Forest, NC 3.0% (May 26) 2nd -0.2pp 8th 21% below peers
Mooresville, NC 3.6% (May 26) 9th -0.2pp 9th 5% below peers
Battle Creek, MI 5.9% (May 26) 26th -0.2pp 10th 55% above peers
Methuen, MA 4.6% (May 26) 22nd -0.1pp 11th 21% above peers
Placentia, CA 3.7% (May 26) 12th +0.1pp 12th 3% below peers
Twin Falls, ID 3.2% (May 26) 3rd +0.1pp 13th 16% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 3.8% (May 26) 14th +0.2pp 14th on par with peers
Diamond Bar, CA 4.7% (May 26) 23rd +0.2pp 15th 24% above peers
Galveston, TX 4.2% (May 26) 18th +0.2pp 16th 11% above peers
Huntington Park, CA 4.9% (May 26) 24th +0.2pp 17th 29% above peers
Burleson, TX 3.5% (May 26) 7th +0.2pp 18th 8% below peers
Minnetonka, MN 3.9% (May 26) 15th +0.4pp 19th 3% above peers
Normal, IL 3.7% (May 26) 13th +0.4pp 20th 3% below peers
Edina, MN 3.9% (May 26) 16th +0.5pp 21st 3% above peers
Manhattan, KS 3.3% (May 26) 4th +0.5pp 22nd 13% below peers
Wheaton, IL 4.3% (May 26) 19th +0.7pp 23rd 13% above peers
Pensacola, FL 4.3% (May 26) 20th +0.9pp 24th 13% above peers
Pinellas Park, FL 4.1% (May 26) 17th +1.0pp 25th 8% above peers
Oak Park, IL 5.1% (May 26) 25th +1.0pp 26th 34% above peers
BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics through 2025 administrative trend: robust fit about this metric
Economy

Share of people below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Poverty fell 3.8 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 7.4% to 3.6% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.4pp). 10 of the 29 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the stronger third of similar-size cities and kept improving; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 13 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: poverty fell 4.0 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (7.6% to 3.6%).
3.6%
20112024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Utah ref 8.1% -1.2pp
United States ref 12.0%
Eagle Mountain, UT 3.6% 1st -3.8pp 1st 65% below peers
Aloha, OR 7.8% 11th -3.9pp 2nd 25% below peers
Mooresville, NC 7.2% 9th -2.8pp 3rd 30% below peers
Elyria, OH 16.5% 24th -6.3pp 4th 61% above peers
Pensacola, FL 12.5% 18th -4.7pp 5th 22% above peers
Twin Falls, ID 11.2% 17th -3.3pp 6th 9% above peers
Huntington Park, CA 18.2% 27th -5.3pp 7th 77% above peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 4.5% 3rd -1.3pp 8th 56% below peers
Battle Creek, MI 17.3% 25th -4.4pp 9th 69% above peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 10.3% 16th -2.3pp 10th on par with peers
Elkhart, IN 17.9% 26th -3.6pp 11th 74% above peers
Wake Forest, NC 4.4% 2nd -0.9pp 12th 57% below peers
Normal, IL 18.5% 28th -3.6pp 13th 80% above peers
Lincoln, CA 6.8% 7th -1.0pp 14th 33% below peers
Manhattan, KS 20.6% 30th -2.9pp 15th 101% above peers
Colton, CA 13.6% 21st -1.4pp 16th 32% above peers
Joplin, MO 16.4% 23rd -1.2pp 17th 59% above peers
Pinellas Park, FL 12.7% 19th -0.9pp 18th 24% above peers
Edina, MN 4.6% 4th -0.2pp 19th 55% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 9.7% 14th -0.4pp 20th 6% below peers
Oak Park, IL 7.4% 10th -0.2pp 21st 28% below peers
Placentia, CA 7.9% 12th -0.2pp 22nd 23% below peers
Wheaton, IL 5.2% 5th +0.1pp 23rd 49% below peers
Galveston, TX 20.1% 29th +1.6pp 24th 95% above peers
Grand Island, NE 15.0% 22nd +2.4pp 25th 46% above peers
Burleson, TX 7.1% 8th +1.4pp 26th 31% below peers
Wheaton, MD 12.9% 20th +2.8pp 27th 26% above peers
Novato, CA 9.6% 13th +2.7pp 28th 7% below peers
Minnetonka, MN 5.9% 6th +1.9pp 29th 43% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA 10.0% 15th +3.9pp 30th 3% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 6 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of people below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
6 of 6 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Apex, NC down 2.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Westfield, IN down 2.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Cupertino, CA down 1.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 97% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.3pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Share of children below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Child poverty fell 6.2 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 9.7% to 3.6% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.1pp). 12 of the 29 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the stronger third of similar-size cities and kept improving; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 17 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: child poverty fell 5.0 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (8.6% to 3.6%).
3.6%
20132024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Utah ref 8.8% -2.2pp
United States ref 16.1%
Catalina Foothills, AZ 2.2% 1st -5.4pp 1st 83% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 3.6% 2nd -6.2pp 2nd 73% below peers
Mooresville, NC 6.4% 8th -6.1pp 3rd 52% below peers
Normal, IL 7.4% 9th -5.5pp 4th 44% below peers
Lincoln, CA 6.3% 7th -4.6pp 5th 53% below peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 10.4% 15th -6.2pp 6th 22% below peers
Pensacola, FL 17.9% 21st -10.5pp 7th 34% above peers
Placentia, CA 7.7% 11th -4.3pp 8th 42% below peers
Aloha, OR 10.2% 13th -5.7pp 9th 24% below peers
Battle Creek, MI 22.6% 26th -12.2pp 10th 69% above peers
Elyria, OH 26.1% 28th -13.1pp 11th 95% above peers
Aspen Hill, MD 10.4% 14th -4.2pp 12th 22% below peers
Wake Forest, NC 4.0% 3rd -1.3pp 13th 70% below peers
Huntington Park, CA 25.8% 27th -8.7pp 14th 94% above peers
Joplin, MO 19.1% 24th -5.3pp 15th 43% above peers
Twin Falls, ID 15.0% 19th -4.1pp 16th 12% above peers
Pinellas Park, FL 13.3% 16th -2.8pp 17th on par with peers
Edina, MN 4.5% 4th -0.4pp 18th 67% below peers
Colton, CA 20.7% 25th -1.0pp 19th 55% above peers
Elkhart, IN 31.0% 29th -1.4pp 20th 133% above peers
Grand Island, NE 18.8% 23rd +0.4pp 21st 40% above peers
Burleson, TX 7.6% 10th +0.5pp 22nd 43% below peers
Wheaton, IL 5.0% 5th +0.5pp 23rd 63% below peers
Manhattan, KS 16.8% 20th +2.3pp 24th 26% above peers
Wheaton, MD 18.6% 22nd +3.0pp 25th 39% above peers
Galveston, TX 35.7% 30th +9.2pp 26th 167% above peers
Minnetonka, MN 5.7% 6th +2.5pp 27th 57% below peers
Novato, CA 13.4% 17th +6.3pp 28th on par with peers
Diamond Bar, CA 13.6% 18th +7.2pp 29th 2% above peers
Oak Park, IL 8.6% 12th +4.9pp 30th 35% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 6 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of children below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
6 of 6 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Westfield, IN down 6.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Catalina Foothills, AZ down 5.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Apex, NC down 4.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.1pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Households with a broadband internet subscription

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Broadband rose 4.5 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 93.9% to 98.4% - more than the combined survey margin (±3.0pp). 29 of the 29 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the stronger third of similar-size cities and kept improving; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 29 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: broadband rose 6.6 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (91.8% to 98.4%).
98.4%
20172024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Utah ref 93.5% +5.6pp
United States ref 91.1%
Huntington Park, CA 89.3% 26th +13.9pp 1st 5% below peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 96.2% 5th +13.9pp 2nd 2% above peers
Elkhart, IN 90.2% 23rd +12.5pp 3rd 4% below peers
Elyria, OH 87.0% 29th +11.6pp 4th 8% below peers
Battle Creek, MI 90.6% 22nd +11.8pp 5th 4% below peers
Pensacola, FL 92.5% 18th +9.7pp 6th 2% below peers
Joplin, MO 88.6% 27th +9.2pp 7th 6% below peers
Galveston, TX 91.5% 20th +9.4pp 8th 3% below peers
Normal, IL 86.8% 30th +8.1pp 9th 8% below peers
Colton, CA 90.8% 21st +8.2pp 10th 4% below peers
Mooresville, NC 96.9% 3rd +8.7pp 11th 3% above peers
Grand Island, NE 89.7% 25th +7.8pp 12th 5% below peers
Oak Park, IL 94.4% 14th +6.7pp 13th on par with peers
Twin Falls, ID 90.0% 24th +6.2pp 14th 5% below peers
Wheaton, MD 95.9% 8th +6.5pp 15th 2% above peers
Burleson, TX 95.2% 12th +5.9pp 16th 1% above peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 96.8% 4th +5.9pp 17th 3% above peers
Pinellas Park, FL 87.7% 28th +5.1pp 18th 7% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 94.3% 15th +5.0pp 19th on par with peers
Lincoln, CA 93.6% 16th +4.3pp 20th 1% below peers
Manhattan, KS 92.1% 19th +4.2pp 21st 2% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 98.4% 1st +4.5pp 22nd 4% above peers
Wake Forest, NC 98.1% 2nd +4.3pp 23rd 4% above peers
Edina, MN 93.4% 17th +4.0pp 24th 1% below peers
Minnetonka, MN 95.8% 9th +3.8pp 25th 2% above peers
Wheaton, IL 95.8% 10th +3.4pp 26th 2% above peers
Novato, CA 94.7% 13th +3.0pp 27th on par with peers
Aloha, OR 96.1% 6th +2.8pp 28th 2% above peers
Placentia, CA 95.4% 11th +2.4pp 29th 1% above peers
Diamond Bar, CA 96.1% 7th +2.1pp 30th 2% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 6 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds with a broadband internet subscription
Loading tract map…
6 of 6 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Wheaton, MD up 6.5pp between its surveys · a smaller real gain than 52% of this group · 2019-2024
  • South San Francisco, CA up 6.3pp between its surveys · a smaller real gain than 54% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Chino, CA up 6.0pp between its surveys · a smaller real gain than 56% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.7pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Income inequality (Gini index)

▼ Lower is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Inequality rose about 16% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 0.28 to 0.33 - more than the combined survey margin (±0.03). That reverses the previous span, which went down between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys. 1 of the 29 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 2 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: inequality rose about 1% from 2014 to 2024 (0.32 to 0.33).
0.33
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Utah ref 0.43 +0.000
United States ref 0.48 +0.001
Lincoln, CA 0.40 6th -0.017 1st 10% below peers
Pensacola, FL 0.49 26th -0.020 2nd 8% above peers
Battle Creek, MI 0.45 16th -0.018 3rd on par with peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 0.49 27th -0.018 4th 9% above peers
Colton, CA 0.39 3rd -0.007 5th 13% below peers
Huntington Park, CA 0.41 8th -0.007 6th 8% below peers
Joplin, MO 0.48 24th -0.008 7th 6% above peers
Edina, MN 0.53 31st -0.008 8th 18% above peers
Aspen Hill, MD 0.42 11th -0.006 9th 6% below peers
Oak Park, IL 0.48 25th -0.006 10th 7% above peers
Wheaton, MD 0.41 7th -0.005 11th 9% below peers
Minnetonka, MN 0.47 23rd -0.006 12th 5% above peers
Mooresville, NC 0.42 9th -0.005 13th 7% below peers
Twin Falls, ID 0.43 13th -0.002 14th 5% below peers
Aloha, OR 0.36 2nd -0.002 15th 20% below peers
Elyria, OH 0.45 15th +0.003 16th 1% below peers
Wheaton, IL 0.46 20th +0.003 17th 2% above peers
Wake Forest, NC 0.39 4th +0.003 18th 13% below peers
Pinellas Park, FL 0.44 14th +0.008 19th 3% below peers
Novato, CA 0.47 22nd +0.014 20th 4% above peers
Manhattan, KS 0.49 28th +0.015 21st 10% above peers
Galveston, TX 0.52 30th +0.017 22nd 17% above peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 0.45 17th +0.024 23rd 1% above peers
Placentia, CA 0.42 12th +0.023 24th 6% below peers
Normal, IL 0.51 29th +0.029 25th 14% above peers
Grand Island, NE 0.47 21st +0.030 26th 4% above peers
Diamond Bar, CA 0.45 18th +0.030 27th 1% above peers
Elkhart, IN 0.46 19th +0.031 28th 2% above peers
Burleson, TX 0.40 5th +0.028 29th 12% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 0.33 1st +0.046 30th 27% below peers
Methuen, MA 0.42 10th 7% below peers
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B19083) through 2024 ±0.03 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Households receiving SNAP

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

SNAP changed less than the survey can measure between the 2014-2018 and 2019-2023 surveys (4.5% then, 5.8% now; margin ±2.7pp).

Within the survey margin, 2014-2018 vs 2019-2023 surveys; 11 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: snap fell 5.0 percentage points from 2013 to 2023 (10.8% to 5.8%).
5.8%
20102023
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2019-2023 survey Today's rank Change2014-2018 → 2019-2023 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Utah ref 5.3% -1.9pp
United States ref 11.8% -0.5pp
Wheaton, IL 3.6% 4th -1.7pp 1st 61% below peers
Elkhart, IN 12.8% 22nd -5.8pp 2nd 36% above peers
Grand Island, NE 9.4% 16th -4.1pp 3rd on par with peers
Pensacola, FL 11.4% 19th -4.0pp 4th 21% above peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 17.6% 29th -4.6pp 5th 88% above peers
Burleson, TX 4.9% 6th -1.1pp 6th 48% below peers
Elyria, OH 16.0% 27th -3.3pp 7th 71% above peers
Battle Creek, MI 16.8% 28th -3.2pp 8th 80% above peers
Galveston, TX 13.0% 23rd -2.3pp 9th 39% above peers
Colton, CA 14.9% 25th -2.5pp 10th 59% above peers
Aloha, OR 12.1% 20th -1.8pp 11th 29% above peers
Normal, IL 7.3% 14th -0.9pp 12th 22% below peers
Pinellas Park, FL 13.4% 24th -1.6pp 13th 43% above peers
Joplin, MO 15.7% 26th -0.9pp 14th 67% above peers
Wake Forest, NC 5.8% 7th +0.0pp 15th 39% below peers
Minnetonka, MN 3.4% 3rd +0.0pp 16th 64% below peers
Twin Falls, ID 12.6% 21st +0.6pp 17th 35% above peers
Oak Park, IL 7.3% 13th +0.6pp 18th 23% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 10.8% 18th +0.9pp 19th 15% above peers
Wheaton, MD 10.4% 17th +0.9pp 20th 11% above peers
Mooresville, NC 6.6% 10th +0.8pp 21st 29% below peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 2.6% 1st +0.4pp 22nd 72% below peers
Huntington Park, CA 24.0% 30th +4.9pp 23rd 156% above peers
Edina, MN 2.7% 2nd +0.6pp 24th 71% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 5.8% 8th +1.2pp 25th 39% below peers
Manhattan, KS 7.7% 15th +1.6pp 26th 18% below peers
Placentia, CA 7.0% 12th +1.7pp 27th 26% below peers
Lincoln, CA 4.3% 5th +1.3pp 28th 54% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA 6.2% 9th +3.4pp 29th 34% below peers
Novato, CA 6.8% 11th +3.7pp 30th 28% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 6 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2018 to 2023, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds receiving SNAP
Loading tract map…
6 of 6 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Queen Creek, AZ down 2.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2018-2023
  • El Dorado Hills, CA down 1.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2018-2023
  • South Jordan, UT down 1.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2018-2023
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2023 ±1.9pp at 90% confidence (2023 estimate) survey trend: 2014-2018 vs 2019-2023 surveys about this metric
See all Economy data →
Housing
Housing

Typical home value

No better direction Rising, slower than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Home value was essentially flat over the 12 months ending June 2026.

Multi-year view: home value is about 9% higher than in 2021 ($469,642 then, $512,413 now), but the direction has turned: after peaking near $572,502 in 2022 it has fallen mostly since.
Longer view: home value rose about 10% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: $512,413 in June 2026, up from $512,030 a year earlier.
$512,413
2003June 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 25 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Utah ref $541,692 (Jun 26) +1.4%
United States ref $372,995 (Jun 26) +0.8%
Oak Park, IL $492,876 (Jun 26) 12th +10.7% 1st 1% above peers
Elkhart, IN $231,940 (Jun 26) 22nd +5.8% 2nd 52% below peers
Wheaton, IL $524,542 (Jun 26) 7th +5.2% 3rd 8% above peers
Manhattan, KS $299,405 (Jun 26) 18th +4.8% 4th 38% below peers
Elyria, OH $191,593 (Jun 26) 24th +4.7% 5th 61% below peers
Battle Creek, MI $185,143 (Jun 26) 25th +4.0% 6th 62% below peers
Edina, MN $635,999 (Jun 26) 6th +3.9% 7th 31% above peers
Minnetonka, MN $496,328 (Jun 26) 11th +3.5% 8th 2% above peers
Twin Falls, ID $374,440 (Jun 26) 14th +3.0% 9th 23% below peers
Joplin, MO $207,698 (Jun 26) 23rd +1.3% 10th 57% below peers
Huntington Park, CA $674,652 (Jun 26) 4th +1.3% 11th 39% above peers
Pensacola, FL $268,527 (Jun 26) 20th +1.1% 12th 45% below peers
Placentia, CA $1,117,757 (Jun 26) 1st +1.0% 13th 130% above peers
Grand Island, NE $258,203 (Jun 26) 21st +1.0% 14th 47% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA $1,029,682 (Jun 26) 3rd +0.9% 15th 112% above peers
Novato, CA $1,084,524 (Jun 26) 2nd +0.6% 16th 123% above peers
Mooresville, NC $486,446 (Jun 26) 13th +0.1% 17th on par with peers
Eagle Mountain, UT $512,413 (Jun 26) 9th +0.1% 18th 5% above peers
Colton, CA $499,865 (Jun 26) 10th +0.0% 19th 3% above peers
Normal, IL $269,011 (Jun 26) 19th -0.3% 20th 45% below peers
Lincoln, CA $648,541 (Jun 26) 5th -0.6% 21st 33% above peers
Burleson, TX $342,356 (Jun 26) 15th -1.3% 22nd 30% below peers
Wake Forest, NC $515,729 (Jun 26) 8th -1.5% 23rd 6% above peers
Pinellas Park, FL $303,946 (Jun 26) 17th -3.8% 24th 38% below peers
Galveston, TX $322,876 (Jun 26) 16th -6.5% 25th 34% below peers
Zillow Home Value Index through 2026-06 modeled trend: robust fit about this metric
Housing

Starter home value (bottom tier)

No better direction Rising, slower than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Starter homes was essentially flat over the 12 months ending June 2026.

Multi-year view: starter homes is about 12% higher than in 2021 ($376,229 then, $421,900 now), but the direction has turned: after peaking near $466,241 in 2022 it has fallen mostly since.
Longer view: starter homes rose about 11% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: $421,900 in June 2026, up from $421,827 a year earlier.
$421,900
2003June 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 25 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Utah ref $393,160 (Jun 26) +1.2%
United States ref $202,486 (Jun 26) +2.0%
Manhattan, KS $212,920 (Jun 26) 17th +6.7% 1st 19% below peers
Oak Park, IL $251,868 (Jun 26) 14th +6.4% 2nd 5% below peers
Elyria, OH $130,769 (Jun 26) 24th +5.9% 3rd 50% below peers
Wheaton, IL $347,090 (Jun 26) 9th +5.7% 4th 32% above peers
Elkhart, IN $155,976 (Jun 26) 22nd +5.4% 5th 41% below peers
Twin Falls, ID $290,945 (Jun 26) 12th +4.1% 6th 10% above peers
Normal, IL $202,576 (Jun 26) 19th +3.5% 7th 23% below peers
Battle Creek, MI $111,016 (Jun 26) 25th +2.5% 8th 58% below peers
Pensacola, FL $170,760 (Jun 26) 21st +2.1% 9th 35% below peers
Joplin, MO $135,847 (Jun 26) 23rd +2.0% 10th 49% below peers
Minnetonka, MN $312,027 (Jun 26) 11th +1.3% 11th 18% above peers
Colton, CA $410,588 (Jun 26) 7th +1.2% 12th 56% above peers
Grand Island, NE $184,364 (Jun 26) 20th +1.1% 13th 30% below peers
Huntington Park, CA $571,523 (Jun 26) 4th +0.8% 14th 117% above peers
Mooresville, NC $328,500 (Jun 26) 10th +0.7% 15th 25% above peers
Placentia, CA $819,310 (Jun 26) 1st +0.6% 16th 211% above peers
Novato, CA $724,341 (Jun 26) 2nd +0.2% 17th 175% above peers
Eagle Mountain, UT $421,900 (Jun 26) 6th +0.0% 18th 60% above peers
Diamond Bar, CA $719,346 (Jun 26) 3rd -0.3% 19th 173% above peers
Lincoln, CA $530,010 (Jun 26) 5th -0.8% 20th 101% above peers
Wake Forest, NC $364,168 (Jun 26) 8th -2.2% 21st 38% above peers
Burleson, TX $263,855 (Jun 26) 13th -2.6% 22nd on par with peers
Edina, MN $245,840 (Jun 26) 15th -2.7% 23rd 7% below peers
Pinellas Park, FL $215,851 (Jun 26) 16th -4.7% 24th 18% below peers
Galveston, TX $202,732 (Jun 26) 18th -7.0% 25th 23% below peers
Zillow Home Value Index through 2026-06 modeled trend: robust fit about this metric
Housing

Homeownership rate

▲ Higher is better Turning down (early signal)
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Homeownership changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (87.5% then, 84.7% now; margin ±4.2pp). The newest releases lean downward: each of the last 4 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 10 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: homeownership fell 1.3 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (86.0% to 84.7%).
84.7%
20112024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Utah ref 70.2% +0.1pp
United States ref 65.2%
Manhattan, KS 43.5% 29th +4.5pp 1st 33% below peers
Battle Creek, MI 66.0% 14th +6.4pp 2nd 2% above peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 71.0% 10th +5.3pp 3rd 10% above peers
Pensacola, FL 64.2% 17th +4.6pp 4th 1% below peers
Galveston, TX 46.2% 28th +2.4pp 5th 29% below peers
Lincoln, CA 83.9% 2nd +4.2pp 6th 30% above peers
Elkhart, IN 53.2% 26th +2.5pp 7th 18% below peers
Minnetonka, MN 71.6% 9th +2.6pp 8th 11% above peers
Wake Forest, NC 74.0% 5th +2.6pp 9th 14% above peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 76.5% 4th +2.7pp 10th 18% above peers
Edina, MN 72.4% 6th +1.6pp 11th 12% above peers
Colton, CA 52.8% 27th +1.1pp 12th 18% below peers
Burleson, TX 72.1% 7th +1.5pp 13th 11% above peers
Twin Falls, ID 64.1% 18th +1.2pp 14th 1% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA 77.3% 3rd +1.3pp 15th 19% above peers
Pinellas Park, FL 69.0% 11th +1.0pp 16th 6% above peers
Elyria, OH 60.0% 21st +0.6pp 17th 7% below peers
Oak Park, IL 60.0% 20th +0.5pp 18th 7% below peers
Mooresville, NC 58.3% 22nd +0.1pp 19th 10% below peers
Wheaton, MD 64.6% 16th +0.1pp 20th on par with peers
Normal, IL 54.8% 24th -0.6pp 21st 15% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 64.8% 15th -0.8pp 22nd on par with peers
Grand Island, NE 57.8% 23rd -1.0pp 23rd 11% below peers
Wheaton, IL 71.7% 8th -1.6pp 24th 11% above peers
Placentia, CA 63.6% 19th -1.7pp 25th 2% below peers
Novato, CA 66.1% 13th -2.0pp 26th 2% above peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 84.7% 1st -2.8pp 27th 31% above peers
Aloha, OR 67.1% 12th -3.1pp 28th 4% above peers
Joplin, MO 53.4% 25th -4.3pp 29th 18% below peers
Huntington Park, CA 24.2% 30th -3.0pp 30th 63% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 6 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHomeownership rate
Loading tract map…
6 of 6 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±2.2pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys *Early signal: consecutive releases agree on direction only; the size of the newest movement is not measurable from overlapping surveys. about this metric
Housing

Typical asking rent

No better direction Rising recently
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Rent rose about 3% over the 12 months ending June 2026, slower than 54% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: rent rose about 2% a year from 2023 to 2026, slower than 91% of similar-size cities.
Most recent monthly reading: $2,265 in June 2026, up from $2,201 a year earlier.
$2,265
2023June 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 25 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
United States ref $1,965 (Jun 26) +2.2%
Joplin, MO $1,306 (Jun 26) 21st +7.9% 1st 28% below peers
Elkhart, IN $1,174 (Jun 26) 23rd +6.2% 2nd 35% below peers
Battle Creek, MI $1,146 (Jun 26) 24th +6.1% 3rd 37% below peers
Novato, CA $3,857 (Jun 26) 1st +5.6% 4th 113% above peers
Oak Park, IL $2,160 (Jun 26) 7th +5.5% 5th 19% above peers
Manhattan, KS $1,293 (Jun 26) 22nd +5.1% 6th 29% below peers
Colton, CA $1,929 (Jun 26) 10th +4.4% 7th 6% above peers
Galveston, TX $1,356 (Jun 26) 19th +4.4% 8th 25% below peers
Huntington Park, CA $1,820 (Jun 26) 12th +3.7% 9th on par with peers
Lincoln, CA $3,006 (Jun 26) 3rd +3.3% 10th 66% above peers
Minnetonka, MN $1,857 (Jun 26) 11th +3.2% 11th 2% above peers
Edina, MN $2,009 (Jun 26) 9th +3.2% 12th 11% above peers
Elyria, OH $1,126 (Jun 26) 25th +3.0% 13th 38% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT $2,265 (Jun 26) 5th +2.9% 14th 25% above peers
Pensacola, FL $1,657 (Jun 26) 15th +2.9% 15th 9% below peers
Twin Falls, ID $1,575 (Jun 26) 17th +2.8% 16th 13% below peers
Normal, IL $1,403 (Jun 26) 18th +2.0% 17th 23% below peers
Placentia, CA $2,796 (Jun 26) 4th +1.9% 18th 54% above peers
Diamond Bar, CA $3,301 (Jun 26) 2nd +1.0% 19th 82% above peers
Wake Forest, NC $1,813 (Jun 26) 13th +0.9% 20th on par with peers
Wheaton, IL $2,169 (Jun 26) 6th +0.9% 21st 20% above peers
Grand Island, NE $1,337 (Jun 26) 20th +0.8% 22nd 26% below peers
Mooresville, NC $1,621 (Jun 26) 16th +0.2% 23rd 11% below peers
Burleson, TX $1,737 (Jun 26) 14th -1.4% 24th 4% below peers
Pinellas Park, FL $2,101 (Jun 26) 8th -2.0% 25th 16% above peers
Zillow Observed Rent Index through 2026-06 modeled trend: robust fit about this metric
Housing

Housing cost-burdened households

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Cost burden changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (26.6% then, 28.1% now; margin ±5.2pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 6 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: cost burden fell 4.1 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (32.1% to 28.1%).
28.1%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Utah ref 28.0% +1.6pp
United States ref 32.2% +0.4pp
Wheaton, MD 32.2% 15th -7.4pp 1st 2% below peers
Aloha, OR 29.0% 8th -5.3pp 2nd 12% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 33.1% 19th -4.4pp 3rd 1% above peers
Huntington Park, CA 51.1% 31st -4.8pp 4th 55% above peers
Mooresville, NC 28.2% 5th -2.6pp 5th 14% below peers
Elyria, OH 30.2% 9th -2.4pp 6th 8% below peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 23.7% 2nd -1.6pp 7th 28% below peers
Manhattan, KS 36.7% 23rd -2.3pp 8th 12% above peers
Battle Creek, MI 32.0% 13th -1.7pp 9th 3% below peers
Pensacola, FL 33.1% 18th -1.6pp 10th on par with peers
Edina, MN 28.7% 7th -0.9pp 11th 13% below peers
Oak Park, IL 32.1% 14th -0.4pp 12th 2% below peers
Colton, CA 43.9% 29th +0.1pp 13th 33% above peers
Wake Forest, NC 22.5% 1st +0.0pp 14th 32% below peers
Elkhart, IN 33.5% 21st +0.1pp 15th 2% above peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 42.5% 26th +0.3pp 16th 29% above peers
Wheaton, IL 28.5% 6th +1.0pp 17th 13% below peers
Minnetonka, MN 27.7% 3rd +1.1pp 18th 16% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 28.1% 4th +1.5pp 19th 15% below peers
Novato, CA 44.5% 30th +2.6pp 20th 35% above peers
Lincoln, CA 36.8% 24th +2.4pp 21st 12% above peers
Diamond Bar, CA 40.8% 25th +2.7pp 22nd 24% above peers
Pinellas Park, FL 36.0% 22nd +2.6pp 23rd 9% above peers
Joplin, MO 31.7% 12th +2.6pp 24th 4% below peers
Normal, IL 33.0% 17th +3.1pp 25th on par with peers
Twin Falls, ID 32.9% 16th +3.3pp 26th on par with peers
Placentia, CA 43.0% 27th +4.5pp 27th 31% above peers
Galveston, TX 43.7% 28th +4.6pp 28th 33% above peers
Grand Island, NE 30.6% 10th +5.4pp 29th 7% below peers
Burleson, TX 31.2% 11th +7.8pp 30th 5% below peers
Methuen, MA 33.3% 20th 1% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 6 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHousing cost-burdened households
Loading tract map…
6 of 6 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Tinley Park, IL down 4.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 97% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Appleton, WI down 3.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 96% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Decatur, IL down 3.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 93% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (tables B25070 + B25091) through 2024 ±3.5pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Housing

Households without a vehicle

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

No vehicle changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (0.7% then, 0.7% now; margin ±0.8pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 6 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: no vehicle fell 1.4 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (2.0% to 0.7%).
0.7%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Utah ref 4.1% +0.1pp
United States ref 8.3% -0.3pp
Manhattan, KS 4.3% 13th -4.1pp 1st 24% below peers
Mooresville, NC 2.8% 6th -1.6pp 2nd 50% below peers
Elkhart, IN 8.1% 22nd -3.7pp 3rd 43% above peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 3.0% 8th -0.9pp 4th 46% below peers
Lincoln, CA 1.9% 2nd -0.5pp 5th 66% below peers
Twin Falls, ID 3.7% 10th -0.8pp 6th 35% below peers
Minnetonka, MN 4.1% 11th -0.8pp 7th 28% below peers
Battle Creek, MI 10.7% 27th -1.9pp 8th 89% above peers
Oak Park, IL 11.7% 29th -1.7pp 9th 107% above peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 2.8% 5th -0.4pp 10th 51% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA 2.4% 4th -0.2pp 11th 58% below peers
Elyria, OH 8.9% 25th -0.9pp 12th 58% above peers
Galveston, TX 10.7% 28th -0.6pp 13th 89% above peers
Normal, IL 6.0% 18th -0.3pp 14th 7% above peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 0.7% 1st +0.0pp 15th 88% below peers
Pensacola, FL 8.4% 24th +0.2pp 16th 48% above peers
Pinellas Park, FL 7.5% 21st +0.3pp 17th 33% above peers
Aloha, OR 4.2% 12th +0.2pp 18th 25% below peers
Placentia, CA 2.9% 7th +0.2pp 19th 49% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 8.2% 23rd +0.5pp 20th 46% above peers
Edina, MN 6.5% 19th +0.4pp 21st 15% above peers
Joplin, MO 9.6% 26th +0.8pp 22nd 70% above peers
Huntington Park, CA 14.3% 31st +1.4pp 23rd 154% above peers
Novato, CA 5.0% 14th +0.7pp 24th 11% below peers
Wake Forest, NC 3.2% 9th +0.4pp 25th 44% below peers
Wheaton, MD 12.1% 30th +3.2pp 26th 115% above peers
Wheaton, IL 5.4% 15th +1.6pp 27th 4% below peers
Grand Island, NE 7.3% 20th +2.2pp 28th 30% above peers
Burleson, TX 2.1% 3rd +0.7pp 29th 62% below peers
Colton, CA 5.6% 16th +1.8pp 30th on par with peers
Methuen, MA 6.0% 17th 6% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 6 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHouseholds without a vehicle
Loading tract map…
6 of 6 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Apopka, FL down 2.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Sandy, UT down 1.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Mount Pleasant, SC down 1.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B08201) through 2024 ±0.5pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Housing data →
Health
Health

People without health insurance

▼ Lower is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Uninsured fell 2.0 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 8.7% to 6.7% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.9pp). 6 of the 29 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started mid-pack and has reached a genuinely better level; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 10 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: uninsured fell 3.1 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (9.8% to 6.7%).
6.7%
20122024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Utah ref 8.1% -0.9pp
United States ref 8.2% -0.4pp
Minnetonka, MN 1.3% 1st -1.1pp 1st 82% below peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 8.0% 18th -6.3pp 2nd 7% above peers
Diamond Bar, CA 3.4% 7th -2.4pp 3rd 55% below peers
Wheaton, IL 2.2% 3rd -1.3pp 4th 70% below peers
Twin Falls, ID 8.8% 20th -3.9pp 5th 18% above peers
Lincoln, CA 2.5% 4th -1.0pp 6th 66% below peers
Edina, MN 1.7% 2nd -0.5pp 7th 77% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 6.7% 15th -2.0pp 8th 10% below peers
Elkhart, IN 11.8% 26th -1.9pp 9th 59% above peers
Elyria, OH 6.7% 14th -0.9pp 10th 11% below peers
Galveston, TX 15.9% 30th -1.9pp 11th 113% above peers
Battle Creek, MI 5.2% 12th -0.3pp 12th 30% below peers
Oak Park, IL 3.0% 5th -0.1pp 13th 59% below peers
Burleson, TX 10.6% 22nd +0.0pp 14th 42% above peers
Mooresville, NC 7.7% 17th +0.0pp 15th 3% above peers
Huntington Park, CA 17.9% 31st +0.5pp 16th 140% above peers
Placentia, CA 6.4% 13th +0.3pp 17th 14% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 13.6% 27th +0.6pp 18th 83% above peers
Joplin, MO 11.6% 24th +0.5pp 19th 55% above peers
Pensacola, FL 11.0% 23rd +0.8pp 20th 48% above peers
Pinellas Park, FL 11.8% 25th +1.0pp 21st 58% above peers
Wheaton, MD 14.3% 28th +1.4pp 22nd 92% above peers
Colton, CA 9.1% 21st +1.0pp 23rd 21% above peers
Grand Island, NE 14.3% 29th +1.8pp 24th 93% above peers
Wake Forest, NC 4.7% 9th +0.7pp 25th 37% below peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 3.5% 8th +0.6pp 26th 53% below peers
Normal, IL 4.8% 10th +0.9pp 27th 35% below peers
Aloha, OR 8.7% 19th +2.0pp 28th 16% above peers
Manhattan, KS 7.5% 16th +2.0pp 29th on par with peers
Novato, CA 4.8% 11th +1.3pp 30th 35% below peers
Methuen, MA 3.3% 6th 55% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 6 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthPeople without health insurance
Loading tract map…
6 of 6 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Tigard, OR down 4.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Lenexa, KS down 3.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Lakewood, NJ down 3.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.0pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Health

Adult obesity

▼ Lower is better Level only
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Adult obesity is roughly in line with the peer median.

31.8%
20202022
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 30 similar-size cities best first
Place Latest Today's rank History Latest vs. peers
Utah ref 32.3%
United States ref 33.4%
Diamond Bar, CA 17.6% 1st 45% below peers
Edina, MN 23.8% 2nd 25% below peers
Minnetonka, MN 24.8% 3rd 22% below peers
Novato, CA 25.3% 4th 20% below peers
Wake Forest, NC 25.8% 5th 19% below peers
Placentia, CA 26.0% 6th 18% below peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 26.3% 7th 17% below peers
Lincoln, CA 26.6% 8th 16% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 27.0% 9th 15% below peers
Wheaton, MD 27.4% 10th 14% below peers
Wheaton, IL 29.0% 11th 9% below peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 29.0% 12th 9% below peers
Oak Park, IL 29.3% 13th 8% below peers
Pensacola, FL 31.7% 14th on par with peers
Mooresville, NC 31.7% 15th on par with peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 31.8% 16th on par with peers
Pinellas Park, FL 31.8% 17th on par with peers
Aloha, OR 32.5% 18th 2% above peers
Huntington Park, CA 33.4% 19th 5% above peers
Manhattan, KS 33.5% 20th 5% above peers
Normal, IL 36.0% 21st 13% above peers
Joplin, MO 36.4% 22nd 14% above peers
Twin Falls, ID 37.3% 23rd 17% above peers
Colton, CA 37.5% 24th 18% above peers
Burleson, TX 38.2% 25th 20% above peers
Grand Island, NE 38.3% 26th 20% above peers
Battle Creek, MI 40.3% 27th 27% above peers
Elyria, OH 42.5% 28th 34% above peers
Galveston, TX 43.1% 29th 36% above peers
Elkhart, IN 45.9% 30th 44% above peers
CDC PLACES through 2022 modeled tract map about this metric
Health

Children without health insurance

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Child uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (7.8% then, 5.6% now; margin ±3.0pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 10 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: child uninsured fell 2.8 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (8.4% to 5.6%).
5.6%
20122024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Utah ref 6.7% -0.5pp
United States ref 5.5% +0.4pp
Wheaton, IL 0.8% 1st -2.3pp 1st 79% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA 2.0% 6th -2.6pp 2nd 50% below peers
Minnetonka, MN 1.0% 2nd -1.1pp 3rd 75% below peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 2.9% 12th -2.9pp 4th 30% below peers
Twin Falls, ID 4.3% 17th -2.2pp 5th 4% above peers
Lincoln, CA 2.1% 7th -1.0pp 6th 49% below peers
Normal, IL 1.4% 3rd -0.6pp 7th 66% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 5.6% 22nd -2.1pp 8th 37% above peers
Colton, CA 3.6% 15th -1.0pp 9th 11% below peers
Elyria, OH 2.6% 10th -0.5pp 10th 36% below peers
Joplin, MO 4.1% 16th -0.6pp 11th on par with peers
Edina, MN 1.9% 5th -0.2pp 12th 54% below peers
Mooresville, NC 2.3% 9th -0.3pp 13th 44% below peers
Burleson, TX 7.0% 27th -0.1pp 14th 72% above peers
Galveston, TX 11.2% 31st -0.1pp 15th 173% above peers
Placentia, CA 2.9% 13th +0.1pp 16th 29% below peers
Grand Island, NE 6.7% 25th +0.4pp 17th 64% above peers
Elkhart, IN 9.7% 30th +0.6pp 18th 135% above peers
Aspen Hill, MD 6.6% 24th +0.5pp 19th 61% above peers
Aloha, OR 5.5% 21st +0.9pp 20th 33% above peers
Huntington Park, CA 8.0% 28th +3.0pp 21st 95% above peers
Oak Park, IL 2.7% 11th +1.2pp 22nd 35% below peers
Wake Forest, NC 2.2% 8th +1.0pp 23rd 45% below peers
Manhattan, KS 3.2% 14th +1.4pp 24th 22% below peers
Wheaton, MD 7.0% 26th +3.2pp 25th 70% above peers
Battle Creek, MI 4.7% 19th +2.2pp 26th 15% above peers
Pinellas Park, FL 8.7% 29th +4.6pp 27th 112% above peers
Pensacola, FL 6.6% 23rd +3.5pp 28th 61% above peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 5.4% 20th +3.5pp 29th 31% above peers
Novato, CA 4.5% 18th +3.4pp 30th 10% above peers
Methuen, MA 1.5% 4th 64% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 6 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthChildren without health insurance
Loading tract map…
6 of 6 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Grand Forks, ND down 5.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Columbus, IN down 6.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Norwalk, CT down 17.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B27001) through 2024 ±1.5pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Health data →
Education
Education

Adults with a bachelor's degree or higher

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

College attainment rose 4.9 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 32.9% to 37.8% - more than the combined survey margin (±3.7pp). 18 of the 29 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started mid-pack and has reached a genuinely better level; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 18 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: college attainment rose 4.8 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (33.0% to 37.8%).
37.8%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Utah ref 37.7% +3.7pp
United States ref 35.7% +3.5pp
Huntington Park, CA 8.5% 31st +2.1pp 1st 78% below peers
Burleson, TX 34.0% 20th +7.6pp 2nd 12% below peers
Galveston, TX 36.0% 18th +6.8pp 3rd 7% below peers
Twin Falls, ID 24.5% 25th +4.0pp 4th 37% below peers
Elkhart, IN 17.7% 29th +2.7pp 5th 54% below peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 31.6% 21st +4.7pp 6th 19% below peers
Lincoln, CA 40.0% 15th +5.8pp 7th 3% above peers
Pinellas Park, FL 25.5% 24th +3.6pp 8th 34% below peers
Pensacola, FL 43.0% 14th +5.8pp 9th 11% above peers
Elyria, OH 17.8% 28th +2.3pp 10th 54% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 37.8% 17th +4.9pp 11th 2% below peers
Mooresville, NC 45.5% 11th +5.3pp 12th 18% above peers
Placentia, CA 44.2% 12th +4.9pp 13th 14% above peers
Aloha, OR 34.5% 19th +3.4pp 14th 11% below peers
Normal, IL 52.9% 8th +4.5pp 15th 37% above peers
Wake Forest, NC 59.5% 6th +4.9pp 16th 54% above peers
Wheaton, MD 38.7% 16th +3.1pp 17th on par with peers
Minnetonka, MN 65.0% 4th +4.8pp 18th 68% above peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 71.4% 3rd +3.7pp 19th 84% above peers
Novato, CA 48.9% 10th +2.4pp 20th 26% above peers
Edina, MN 72.7% 1st +2.9pp 21st 88% above peers
Oak Park, IL 72.5% 2nd +2.5pp 22nd 87% above peers
Manhattan, KS 53.3% 7th +1.4pp 23rd 38% above peers
Grand Island, NE 20.9% 27th +0.3pp 24th 46% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 43.3% 13th +0.3pp 25th 12% above peers
Joplin, MO 26.6% 23rd +0.2pp 26th 31% below peers
Wheaton, IL 64.5% 5th +0.3pp 27th 66% above peers
Battle Creek, MI 21.9% 26th +0.0pp 28th 44% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA 52.8% 9th -2.1pp 29th 36% above peers
Colton, CA 16.6% 30th -0.8pp 30th 57% below peers
Methuen, MA 31.0% 22nd 20% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 6 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationAdults with a bachelor's degree or higher
Loading tract map…
6 of 6 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Apopka, FL up 11.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Troy, NY up 10.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Burleson, TX up 7.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 95% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±2.4pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Education

Children ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool

▲ Higher is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Preschool enrollment changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (37.9% then, 42.6% now; margin ±12.8pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 8 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: preschool enrollment rose 1.5 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (41.1% to 42.6%).
42.6%
20112024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Utah ref 42.5% -1.0pp
United States ref 45.5%
Placentia, CA 60.8% 5th +21.8pp 1st 28% above peers
Colton, CA 46.5% 16th +15.4pp 2nd 2% below peers
Wheaton, MD 50.5% 11th +15.9pp 3rd 6% above peers
Grand Island, NE 45.6% 17th +13.3pp 4th 4% below peers
Normal, IL 57.0% 7th +11.3pp 5th 20% above peers
Manhattan, KS 60.8% 4th +11.1pp 6th 28% above peers
Novato, CA 67.7% 1st +8.4pp 7th 42% above peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 42.6% 20th +4.7pp 8th 11% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 33.9% 27th +3.6pp 9th 29% below peers
Elyria, OH 48.8% 13th +3.8pp 10th 2% above peers
Lincoln, CA 48.8% 12th +0.3pp 11th 2% above peers
Mooresville, NC 47.9% 14th -1.4pp 12th 1% above peers
Elkhart, IN 25.1% 28th -0.9pp 13th 47% below peers
Aloha, OR 34.4% 26th -2.5pp 14th 28% below peers
Battle Creek, MI 35.2% 25th -3.0pp 15th 26% below peers
Huntington Park, CA 41.3% 22nd -4.3pp 16th 13% below peers
Edina, MN 66.6% 2nd -7.9pp 17th 40% above peers
Galveston, TX 43.5% 19th -5.4pp 18th 9% below peers
Wake Forest, NC 52.6% 10th -7.7pp 19th 10% above peers
Twin Falls, ID 35.5% 24th -5.3pp 20th 25% below peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 60.6% 6th -10.0pp 21st 27% above peers
Pinellas Park, FL 37.5% 23rd -6.6pp 22nd 21% below peers
Pensacola, FL 47.7% 15th -8.5pp 23rd on par with peers
Oak Park, IL 62.2% 3rd -13.3pp 24th 31% above peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 56.7% 8th -12.4pp 25th 19% above peers
Wheaton, IL 54.2% 9th -18.7pp 26th 14% above peers
Joplin, MO 21.9% 30th -8.0pp 27th 54% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA 45.1% 18th -20.2pp 28th 5% below peers
Burleson, TX 24.3% 29th -19.2pp 29th 49% below peers
Minnetonka, MN 41.7% 21st -36.0pp 30th 13% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 6 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationChildren ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool
Loading tract map…
6 of 6 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Severn, MD up 33.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Auburn, WA up 21.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Bel Air South, MD up 26.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±10.0pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Education

Teens not in school and not working

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Disconnected youth changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (6.1% then, 7.3% now; margin ±5.8pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 2 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
7.3%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Utah ref 6.3% +0.5pp
United States ref 6.9% +0.3pp
Catalina Foothills, AZ 0.0% 1st -3.3pp 1st 100% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 3.6% 10th -2.9pp 2nd 45% below peers
Oak Park, IL 1.3% 3rd -0.9pp 3rd 81% below peers
Novato, CA 4.7% 11th -3.3pp 4th 30% below peers
Lincoln, CA 3.6% 9th -2.3pp 5th 47% below peers
Manhattan, KS 1.8% 5th -0.9pp 6th 73% below peers
Elkhart, IN 11.1% 25th -3.6pp 7th 66% above peers
Pinellas Park, FL 6.5% 15th -1.3pp 8th 3% below peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 7.6% 20th -1.0pp 9th 14% above peers
Aloha, OR 6.3% 14th -0.2pp 10th 6% below peers
Burleson, TX 14.2% 29th +0.1pp 11th 113% above peers
Mooresville, NC 7.1% 18th +0.5pp 12th 7% above peers
Joplin, MO 5.2% 12th +0.8pp 13th 22% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 7.3% 19th +1.2pp 14th 9% above peers
Twin Falls, ID 8.7% 22nd +1.5pp 15th 31% above peers
Wheaton, IL 1.3% 4th +0.2pp 16th 81% below peers
Elyria, OH 18.2% 31st +3.6pp 17th 172% above peers
Grand Island, NE 6.7% 16th +1.8pp 18th on par with peers
Galveston, TX 10.2% 23rd +3.2pp 19th 52% above peers
Huntington Park, CA 14.2% 30th +5.0pp 20th 113% above peers
Minnetonka, MN 2.6% 7th +1.0pp 21st 61% below peers
Battle Creek, MI 13.1% 28th +5.9pp 22nd 96% above peers
Edina, MN 3.3% 8th +1.5pp 23rd 51% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA 2.3% 6th +1.1pp 24th 66% below peers
Wheaton, MD 10.4% 24th +5.0pp 25th 55% above peers
Placentia, CA 6.8% 17th +3.9pp 26th 1% above peers
Colton, CA 11.6% 26th +7.5pp 27th 74% above peers
Pensacola, FL 11.7% 27th +8.7pp 28th 75% above peers
Normal, IL 0.8% 2nd +0.6pp 29th 88% below peers
Wake Forest, NC 8.2% 21st +6.7pp 30th 22% above peers
Methuen, MA 6.3% 13th 6% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 6 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationTeens not in school and not working
Loading tract map…
6 of 6 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Alpharetta, GA down 6.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Eagan, MN down 4.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Johns Creek, GA down 4.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B14005) through 2024 ±4.5pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Education data →
Demographics
Demographics

Population

No better direction Rising
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Population rose about 64% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 32,412 to 53,290 - more than the combined survey margin (±74). 16 of the 29 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.

Rising beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 24 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: population rose about 127% from 2014 to 2024 (23,468 to 53,290).
53,290
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 53,290 13th +64% 1st on par with peers
Mooresville, NC 52,381 30th +38% 2nd 1% below peers
Wake Forest, NC 52,844 23rd +25% 3rd on par with peers
Burleson, TX 52,918 21st +15% 4th on par with peers
Lincoln, CA 52,956 19th +12% 5th on par with peers
Twin Falls, ID 54,164 2nd +11% 6th 2% above peers
Galveston, TX 53,424 10th +6% 7th 1% above peers
Wheaton, MD 52,926 20th +5% 8th on par with peers
Joplin, MO 52,593 26th +4% 9th 1% below peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 52,593 27th +4% 10th 1% below peers
Grand Island, NE 52,884 22nd +3% 11th on par with peers
Edina, MN 53,262 15th +3% 12th on par with peers
Elkhart, IN 53,733 5th +3% 13th 1% above peers
Pensacola, FL 54,036 3rd +3% 14th 2% above peers
Battle Creek, MI 52,374 31st +2% 15th 1% below peers
Oak Park, IL 53,292 12th +2% 16th on par with peers
Placentia, CA 52,826 24th +2% 17th 1% below peers
Pinellas Park, FL 53,560 7th +1% 18th 1% above peers
Wheaton, IL 53,557 8th +1% 19th 1% above peers
Aspen Hill, MD 53,279 14th +0% 20th on par with peers
Minnetonka, MN 53,064 17th +0% 21st on par with peers
Elyria, OH 53,035 18th -1% 22nd on par with peers
Colton, CA 53,772 4th -1% 23rd 1% above peers
Manhattan, KS 54,239 1st -2% 24th 2% above peers
Normal, IL 53,569 6th -2% 25th 1% above peers
Aloha, OR 52,389 29th -3% 26th 1% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA 53,355 11th -5% 27th on par with peers
Novato, CA 52,546 28th -6% 28th 1% below peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 52,622 25th -6% 29th 1% below peers
Huntington Park, CA 53,108 16th -9% 30th on par with peers
Methuen, MA 53,475 9th 1% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 6 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsPopulation
Loading tract map…
6 of 6 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±36 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Children's share of the population

No better direction Falling
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Children fell 3.4 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 46.8% to 43.4% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.1pp). 10 of the 29 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.

Falling beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 11 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: children fell 5.2 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (48.5% to 43.4%).
43.4%
20172024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Utah ref 26.9% -1.9pp
United States ref 21.6% -0.7pp
Novato, CA 20.5% 23rd +1.8pp 1st 8% below peers
Minnetonka, MN 21.4% 19th +1.1pp 2nd 5% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 25.6% 6th +1.0pp 3rd 14% above peers
Lincoln, CA 23.0% 14th +0.7pp 4th 3% above peers
Burleson, TX 28.8% 2nd +0.9pp 5th 29% above peers
Grand Island, NE 28.2% 3rd +0.2pp 6th 26% above peers
Placentia, CA 23.2% 13th -0.2pp 7th 4% above peers
Oak Park, IL 23.9% 11th -0.4pp 8th 7% above peers
Battle Creek, MI 24.9% 8th -0.6pp 9th 11% above peers
Elyria, OH 21.9% 18th -0.8pp 10th 2% below peers
Edina, MN 22.4% 16th -1.1pp 11th on par with peers
Elkhart, IN 26.3% 5th -1.3pp 12th 17% above peers
Manhattan, KS 14.6% 31st -0.8pp 13th 35% below peers
Wheaton, IL 22.0% 17th -1.2pp 14th 2% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA 19.0% 24th -1.1pp 15th 15% below peers
Normal, IL 16.1% 27th -1.0pp 16th 28% below peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 15.6% 28th -1.1pp 17th 31% below peers
Joplin, MO 20.9% 21st -1.6pp 18th 7% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 43.4% 1st -3.4pp 19th 94% above peers
Mooresville, NC 24.3% 10th -1.9pp 20th 8% above peers
Twin Falls, ID 25.1% 7th -2.3pp 21st 12% above peers
Wheaton, MD 22.5% 15th -2.1pp 22nd on par with peers
Pinellas Park, FL 17.1% 26th -1.8pp 23rd 24% below peers
Huntington Park, CA 24.7% 9th -3.4pp 24th 10% above peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 15.2% 29th -2.1pp 25th 32% below peers
Wake Forest, NC 26.5% 4th -4.0pp 26th 18% above peers
Galveston, TX 14.8% 30th -2.4pp 27th 34% below peers
Colton, CA 23.4% 12th -4.3pp 28th 4% above peers
Aloha, OR 20.5% 22nd -4.2pp 29th 8% below peers
Pensacola, FL 18.7% 25th -5.6pp 30th 17% below peers
Methuen, MA 21.3% 20th 5% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 6 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren's share of the population
Loading tract map…
6 of 6 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.5pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Children in single-parent families

No better direction No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Single-parent changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (10.4% then, 6.5% now; margin ±4.0pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 4 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: single-parent fell 4.3 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (10.8% to 6.5%).
6.5%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Utah ref 16.5% +0.5pp
United States ref 29.9% -0.2pp
Diamond Bar, CA 20.8% 23rd +5.0pp 1st 17% below peers
Oak Park, IL 22.7% 20th +5.5pp 2nd 9% below peers
Edina, MN 15.1% 28th +3.5pp 3rd 40% below peers
Joplin, MO 40.9% 6th +9.4pp 4th 63% above peers
Twin Falls, ID 31.9% 13th +7.0pp 5th 27% above peers
Novato, CA 23.8% 19th +5.2pp 6th 5% below peers
Huntington Park, CA 51.4% 2nd +7.2pp 7th 105% above peers
Elkhart, IN 56.0% 1st +7.9pp 8th 123% above peers
Mooresville, NC 24.0% 18th +0.6pp 9th 4% below peers
Colton, CA 38.4% 7th +0.0pp 10th 53% above peers
Galveston, TX 42.9% 5th -0.8pp 11th 71% above peers
Wheaton, MD 31.2% 14th -1.1pp 12th 24% above peers
Aloha, OR 25.1% 16th -1.0pp 13th on par with peers
Battle Creek, MI 49.1% 4th -2.3pp 14th 96% above peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 33.2% 11th -1.7pp 15th 33% above peers
Lincoln, CA 16.6% 26th -1.0pp 16th 34% below peers
Pinellas Park, FL 33.2% 12th -2.1pp 17th 32% above peers
Grand Island, NE 38.2% 8th -4.4pp 18th 52% above peers
Pensacola, FL 37.6% 9th -4.8pp 19th 50% above peers
Elyria, OH 49.9% 3rd -7.7pp 20th 99% above peers
Placentia, CA 18.5% 24th -3.2pp 21st 26% below peers
Wheaton, IL 10.1% 30th -1.8pp 22nd 60% below peers
Normal, IL 22.6% 21st -4.2pp 23rd 10% below peers
Manhattan, KS 27.6% 15th -6.2pp 24th 10% above peers
Wake Forest, NC 17.5% 25th -4.5pp 25th 30% below peers
Minnetonka, MN 16.2% 27th -4.7pp 26th 36% below peers
Burleson, TX 22.5% 22nd -7.2pp 27th 10% below peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 14.3% 29th -4.8pp 28th 43% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 24.4% 17th -9.0pp 29th 2% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 6.5% 31st -4.0pp 30th 74% below peers
Methuen, MA 33.9% 10th 35% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 6 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren in single-parent families
Loading tract map…
6 of 6 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B09002) through 2024 ±2.1pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Young children with all parents in the labor force

No better direction No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Working parents changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (41.2% then, 49.8% now; margin ±10.8pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 10 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: working parents rose 11.8 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (38.0% to 49.8%).
49.8%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Utah ref 56.1% +3.6pp
United States ref 68.1% +1.9pp
Colton, CA 71.5% 19th +17.5pp 1st 2% below peers
Wheaton, IL 73.0% 15th +15.4pp 2nd 1% above peers
Diamond Bar, CA 72.6% 16th +15.1pp 3rd on par with peers
Aloha, OR 72.3% 17th +13.7pp 4th on par with peers
Joplin, MO 73.6% 13th +13.7pp 5th 1% above peers
Catalina Foothills, AZ 74.6% 10th +13.5pp 6th 3% above peers
Pensacola, FL 82.8% 1st +14.4pp 7th 14% above peers
Novato, CA 69.8% 20th +12.0pp 8th 4% below peers
Eagle Mountain, UT 49.8% 31st +8.6pp 9th 31% below peers
Aspen Hill, MD 82.2% 2nd +13.4pp 10th 13% above peers
Wake Forest, NC 68.0% 23rd +10.2pp 11th 6% below peers
Oak Park, IL 79.5% 4th +10.1pp 12th 9% above peers
Kendale Lakes, FL 82.0% 3rd +9.0pp 13th 13% above peers
Burleson, TX 72.2% 18th +6.5pp 14th 1% below peers
Pinellas Park, FL 77.0% 6th +6.1pp 15th 6% above peers
Elyria, OH 67.5% 24th +3.0pp 16th 7% below peers
Battle Creek, MI 74.2% 11th +3.0pp 17th 2% above peers
Normal, IL 76.8% 7th +3.0pp 18th 6% above peers
Huntington Park, CA 68.6% 22nd +2.5pp 19th 6% below peers
Lincoln, CA 66.0% 25th +1.8pp 20th 9% below peers
Placentia, CA 69.4% 21st +1.8pp 21st 4% below peers
Wheaton, MD 74.7% 9th +1.7pp 22nd 3% above peers
Minnetonka, MN 78.9% 5th +1.7pp 23rd 9% above peers
Manhattan, KS 73.5% 14th +1.5pp 24th 1% above peers
Twin Falls, ID 63.5% 27th +0.2pp 25th 13% below peers
Mooresville, NC 65.6% 26th -0.5pp 26th 10% below peers
Grand Island, NE 75.0% 8th -3.0pp 27th 3% above peers
Edina, MN 63.1% 28th -10.5pp 28th 13% below peers
Elkhart, IN 56.7% 30th -12.9pp 29th 22% below peers
Galveston, TX 56.9% 29th -17.9pp 30th 22% below peers
Methuen, MA 73.8% 12th 2% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 6 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsYoung children with all parents in the labor force
Loading tract map…
6 of 6 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B23008) through 2024 ±8.7pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Demographics data →