Moving against the better direction for this metric. Oklahoma City is also worsening faster than most of the selected peers.
Violent crime was essentially flat over the 12 months ending July 2026.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 456 (Apr 26) | -9.3% | |||
| Memphis, TN | 1,471 (Jul 26) | -35.5% | 1st | ||
| Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), TN | 836 (Jul 26) | -19.4% | 2nd | ||
| Denver, CO | 808 (Jul 26) | -13.1% | 3rd | ||
| Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), KY | 508 (Jul 26) | -12.1% | 4th | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 459 (Jul 26) | -10.1% | 5th | ||
| El Paso, TX | 274 (Jul 26) | -9.1% | 6th | ||
| Detroit, MI | 1,623 (Jul 26) | -6.0% | 7th | ||
| Boston, MA | 589 (Jul 26) | -0.8% | 8th | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 673 (Jul 26) | -0.5% | 9th | ||
| Seattle, WA | 652 (Jul 26) | +0.1% | 10th | ||
| Portland, OR | 712 (Jul 26) | +1.1% | 11th |
This badge answers one question: can Oklahoma City's own trend be trusted as a real improvement? The trend passed all three checks, so yes. The most recent 12 months agree with the multi-year trend. Most of the selected peers are improving faster than Oklahoma City.
Property crime fell about 5% over the 12 months ending July 2026, slower than 75% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 1,987 (Apr 26) | -12.2% | |||
| Memphis, TN | 3,691 (Jul 26) | -38.3% | 1st | ||
| Washington, DC | 2,687 (Jul 26) | -25.9% | 2nd | ||
| Las Vegas, NV | 5,055 (Apr 26) | -22.5% | 3rd | ||
| Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), TN | 3,381 (Jul 26) | -19.2% | 4th | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 2,614 (Jul 26) | -17.5% | 5th | ||
| El Paso, TX | 1,202 (Jul 26) | -16.3% | 6th | ||
| Detroit, MI | 3,632 (Jul 26) | -13.3% | 7th | ||
| Denver, CO | 3,984 (Jul 26) | -10.3% | 8th | ||
| Seattle, WA | 4,586 (Jul 26) | -6.8% | 9th | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 2,582 (Jul 26) | -4.7% | 10th | ||
| Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), KY | 3,142 (Jul 26) | -4.0% | 11th | ||
| Boston, MA | 1,893 (Jul 26) | -4.0% | 12th | ||
| Portland, OR | 5,327 (Jul 26) | -0.7% | 13th |
The most recent 12 months moved against the better direction, whatever the longer window shows. The checks below judge the multi-year window. Oklahoma City is also worsening faster than most of the selected peers.
Homicides rose about 11% over the 12 months ending July 2026, faster than 100% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 6 (Apr 26) | -17.8% | |||
| Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), TN | 6 (Jul 26) | -55.5% | 1st | ||
| Washington, DC | 14 (Jul 26) | -46.0% | 2nd | ||
| Memphis, TN | 22 (Jul 26) | -40.3% | 3rd | ||
| Seattle, WA | 3 (Jul 26) | -38.9% | 4th | ||
| Boston, MA | 3 (Jul 26) | -38.2% | 5th | ||
| El Paso, TX | 2 (Jul 26) | -30.6% | 6th | ||
| Detroit, MI | 22 (Jul 26) | -19.7% | 7th | ||
| Las Vegas, NV | 12 (Apr 26) | -18.5% | 8th | ||
| Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), KY | 12 (Jul 26) | -15.3% | 9th | ||
| Portland, OR | 6 (Jul 26) | -11.1% | 10th | ||
| Denver, CO | 7 (Jul 26) | -9.2% | 11th | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 4 (Jul 26) | +6.4% | 12th | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 10 (Jul 26) | +10.7% | 13th |
This badge answers one question: can Oklahoma City's own trend be trusted as a real improvement? The trend passed all three checks, so yes. The most recent 12 months agree with the multi-year trend. Most of the selected peers are improving faster than Oklahoma City.
Vehicle theft fell about 16% over the 12 months ending July 2026, slower than 100% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 303 (Apr 26) | -22.2% | |||
| Memphis, TN | 503 (Jul 26) | -58.4% | 1st | ||
| Washington, DC | 354 (Jul 26) | -52.1% | 2nd | ||
| Boston, MA | 74 (Jul 26) | -44.2% | 3rd | ||
| Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), TN | 397 (Jul 26) | -41.8% | 4th | ||
| El Paso, TX | 190 (Jul 26) | -34.3% | 5th | ||
| Denver, CO | 641 (Jul 26) | -33.5% | 6th | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 319 (Jul 26) | -31.7% | 7th | ||
| Las Vegas, NV | 988 (Apr 26) | -31.3% | 8th | ||
| Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), KY | 491 (Jul 26) | -27.2% | 9th | ||
| Detroit, MI | 870 (Jul 26) | -22.5% | 10th | ||
| Seattle, WA | 665 (Jul 26) | -18.6% | 11th | ||
| Portland, OR | 589 (Jul 26) | -16.7% | 12th | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 276 (Jul 26) | -16.3% | 13th |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Household income rose about 24% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from $55,557 to $68,656 (each survey's own dollars, not adjusted for inflation) - more than the combined survey margin (±$1,714).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | $65,039 | +23% | |||||
| United States ref | $80,734 | +28% | |||||
| Denver, CO | $94,718 | 5th | +38% | 1st | 22% above peers | ||
| Boston, MA | $97,344 | 4th | +37% | 2nd | 26% above peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | $123,860 | 2nd | +34% | 3rd | 60% above peers | ||
| Las Vegas, NV | $73,877 | 8th | +31% | 4th | 5% below peers | ||
| Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), TN | $77,371 | 7th | +29% | 5th | on par with peers | ||
| Detroit, MI | $39,938 | 13th | +29% | 6th | 48% below peers | ||
| Portland, OR | $90,919 | 6th | +28% | 7th | 18% above peers | ||
| Washington, DC | $109,870 | 3rd | +27% | 8th | 42% above peers | ||
| El Paso, TX | $59,745 | 11th | +26% | 9th | 23% below peers | ||
| Memphis, TN | $51,736 | 12th | +25% | 10th | 33% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | $140,970 | 1st | +25% | 11th | 82% above peers | ||
| Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), KY | $66,849 | 10th | +25% | 12th | 14% below peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | $68,656 | 9th | +24% | 13th | 11% below peers |
The most recent 12 months moved against the better direction, whatever the longer window shows. The checks below judge the multi-year window. Oklahoma City is also worsening faster than most of the selected peers.
Unemployment rose 1.1 percentage points over the 12 months ending July 2026, faster than 100% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 4.3% (Jul 26) | +1.0pp | ||||
| United States ref | 4.1% (Aug 26) | -0.2pp | ||||
| Washington, DC | 5.9% (Jul 26) | 10th | -0.9pp | 1st | 26% above peers | |
| Las Vegas, NV | 5.3% (Jul 26) | 7th | -0.6pp | 2nd | 13% above peers | |
| San Francisco, CA | 3.9% (Jul 26) | 1st | -0.5pp | 3rd | 17% below peers | |
| Portland, OR | 5.3% (Jul 26) | 8th | -0.1pp | 4th | 13% above peers | |
| Memphis, TN | 5.6% (Jul 26) | 9th | -0.1pp | 5th | 19% above peers | |
| Boston, MA | 4.7% (Jul 26) | 6th | -0.1pp | 6th | on par with peers | |
| Denver, CO | 4.3% (Jul 26) | 2nd | +0.1pp | 7th | 9% below peers | |
| El Paso, TX | 4.6% (Jul 26) | 4th | +0.1pp | 8th | 2% below peers | |
| Seattle, WA | 4.6% (Jul 26) | 5th | +0.4pp | 9th | 2% below peers | |
| Detroit, MI | 12.0% (Jul 26) | 11th | +0.7pp | 10th | 155% above peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 4.3% (Jul 26) | 3rd | +1.1pp | 11th | 9% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Poverty fell 0.9 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 16.1% to 15.1% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.8pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 15.3% | -0.3pp | |||||
| United States ref | 12.4% | ||||||
| Denver, CO | 11.2% | 3rd | -1.6pp | 1st | 26% below peers | ||
| Boston, MA | 16.6% | 10th | -2.3pp | 2nd | 10% above peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 9.9% | 1st | -1.1pp | 3rd | 35% below peers | ||
| Las Vegas, NV | 13.9% | 5th | -1.3pp | 4th | 8% below peers | ||
| Memphis, TN | 23.1% | 12th | -2.0pp | 5th | 53% above peers | ||
| Portland, OR | 12.8% | 4th | -1.0pp | 6th | 16% below peers | ||
| Detroit, MI | 32.7% | 13th | -2.3pp | 7th | 116% above peers | ||
| Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), TN | 14.1% | 6th | -0.9pp | 8th | 7% below peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 15.1% | 7th | -0.9pp | 9th | on par with peers | ||
| Washington, DC | 15.4% | 8th | -0.8pp | 10th | 2% above peers | ||
| El Paso, TX | 18.4% | 11th | -0.7pp | 11th | 21% above peers | ||
| Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), KY | 15.8% | 9th | -0.1pp | 12th | 5% above peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 11.2% | 2nd | +0.8pp | 13th | 26% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Child poverty fell 3.4 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 23.7% to 20.4% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.2pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 20.1% | -1.5pp | |||||
| United States ref | 16.1% | ||||||
| Boston, MA | 21.1% | 7th | -6.6pp | 1st | on par with peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 9.3% | 2nd | -1.6pp | 2nd | 56% below peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 20.4% | 6th | -3.4pp | 3rd | 3% below peers | ||
| Memphis, TN | 35.6% | 12th | -5.1pp | 4th | 69% above peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 16.0% | 4th | -2.2pp | 5th | 24% below peers | ||
| Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), TN | 21.4% | 8th | -2.8pp | 6th | 1% above peers | ||
| Portland, OR | 13.8% | 3rd | -1.7pp | 7th | 35% below peers | ||
| El Paso, TX | 24.4% | 11th | -2.7pp | 8th | 15% above peers | ||
| Las Vegas, NV | 19.2% | 5th | -2.1pp | 9th | 9% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 9.0% | 1st | -0.9pp | 10th | 57% below peers | ||
| Detroit, MI | 46.5% | 13th | -3.7pp | 11th | 120% above peers | ||
| Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), KY | 22.4% | 9th | -1.6pp | 12th | 6% above peers | ||
| Washington, DC | 22.8% | 10th | -1.2pp | 13th | 8% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Broadband rose 9.0 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 83.1% to 92.1% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.7pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 89.0% | +10.0pp | |||||
| United States ref | 91.1% | ||||||
| Detroit, MI | 85.8% | 13th | +21.2pp | 1st | 7% below peers | ||
| Memphis, TN | 87.6% | 12th | +17.9pp | 2nd | 5% below peers | ||
| Las Vegas, NV | 91.8% | 8th | +11.5pp | 3rd | on par with peers | ||
| El Paso, TX | 89.4% | 11th | +10.6pp | 4th | 3% below peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 92.1% | 6th | +9.0pp | 5th | on par with peers | ||
| Washington, DC | 91.3% | 9th | +8.5pp | 6th | 1% below peers | ||
| Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), KY | 90.6% | 10th | +7.9pp | 7th | 2% below peers | ||
| Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), TN | 92.7% | 5th | +7.6pp | 8th | 1% above peers | ||
| Boston, MA | 92.1% | 7th | +6.5pp | 9th | on par with peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 93.0% | 4th | +6.1pp | 10th | 1% above peers | ||
| Portland, OR | 94.0% | 2nd | +5.5pp | 11th | 2% above peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 93.1% | 3rd | +5.3pp | 12th | 1% above peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 94.5% | 1st | +3.9pp | 13th | 3% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Inequality changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (0.47 then, 0.47 now; margin ±0.01).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 0.47 | -0.002 | |||||
| United States ref | 0.48 | +0.001 | |||||
| Washington, DC | 0.52 | 10th | -0.010 | 1st | 5% above peers | ||
| Las Vegas, NV | 0.48 | 4th | -0.008 | 2nd | 2% below peers | ||
| Boston, MA | 0.53 | 13th | -0.008 | 3rd | 8% above peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 0.47 | 1st | -0.004 | 4th | 4% below peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 0.49 | 8th | -0.000 | 5th | on par with peers | ||
| Memphis, TN | 0.52 | 12th | +0.002 | 6th | 6% above peers | ||
| Detroit, MI | 0.51 | 9th | +0.002 | 7th | 5% above peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 0.49 | 7th | +0.004 | 8th | on par with peers | ||
| Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), KY | 0.48 | 5th | +0.005 | 9th | 2% below peers | ||
| Portland, OR | 0.48 | 3rd | +0.005 | 10th | 3% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 0.52 | 11th | +0.012 | 11th | 6% above peers | ||
| El Paso, TX | 0.48 | 2nd | +0.011 | 12th | 3% below peers | ||
| Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), TN | 0.48 | 6th | +0.011 | 13th | 2% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is within the margin, but each of the last 3 annual releases moved the 5-year average the same way. Direction is a reliable early signal; its size is not.
SNAP changed less than the survey can measure between the 2014-2018 and 2019-2023 surveys (13.2% then, 13.7% now; margin ±0.7pp). The newest releases lean upward: each of the last 3 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*
| Place | Latest2019-2023 survey | Today's rank | Change2014-2018 → 2019-2023 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 13.6% | +0.5pp | |||||
| United States ref | 11.8% | -0.5pp | |||||
| Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), TN | 8.7% | 3rd | -3.5pp | 1st | 36% below peers | ||
| Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), KY | 11.8% | 5th | -2.5pp | 2nd | 14% below peers | ||
| Portland, OR | 14.5% | 8th | -2.1pp | 3rd | 5% above peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 7.5% | 1st | -1.0pp | 4th | 45% below peers | ||
| Memphis, TN | 20.4% | 12th | -2.1pp | 5th | 49% above peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 8.3% | 2nd | -0.7pp | 6th | 39% below peers | ||
| Washington, DC | 13.2% | 6th | -0.6pp | 7th | 3% below peers | ||
| Detroit, MI | 38.0% | 13th | -1.7pp | 8th | 177% above peers | ||
| El Paso, TX | 19.1% | 11th | -0.7pp | 9th | 40% above peers | ||
| Las Vegas, NV | 14.5% | 9th | -0.3pp | 10th | 5% above peers | ||
| Boston, MA | 18.6% | 10th | +0.2pp | 11th | 36% above peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 13.7% | 7th | +0.5pp | 12th | on par with peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 9.7% | 4th | +5.0pp | 13th | 29% below peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge only reports which way it is moving and how fast next to the selected peers. Oklahoma City is rising faster than most of the selected peers.
Home value was essentially flat over the 12 months ending August 2026.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | $223,261 (Aug 26) | +2.8% | ||||
| United States ref | $368,697 (Aug 26) | +1.2% | ||||
| San Francisco, CA | $1,424,767 (Aug 26) | 1st | +13.6% | 1st | 172% above peers | |
| El Paso, TX | $238,475 (Aug 26) | 8th | +2.2% | 2nd | 55% below peers | |
| Portland, OR | $527,359 (Aug 26) | 5th | +0.3% | 3rd | 1% above peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | $207,421 (Aug 26) | 9th | +0.2% | 4th | 60% below peers | |
| Washington, DC | $570,082 (Aug 26) | 4th | -1.0% | 5th | 9% above peers | |
| Boston, MA | $774,723 (Aug 26) | 3rd | -1.4% | 6th | 48% above peers | |
| Seattle, WA | $833,192 (Aug 26) | 2nd | -1.6% | 7th | 59% above peers | |
| Denver, CO | $524,695 (Aug 26) | 6th | -2.1% | 8th | on par with peers | |
| Memphis, TN | $145,335 (Aug 26) | 10th | -2.8% | 9th | 72% below peers | |
| Las Vegas, NV | $419,144 (Aug 26) | 7th | -3.0% | 10th | 20% below peers | |
| Detroit, MI | $77,199 (Aug 26) | 11th | -5.7% | 11th | 85% below peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers. Oklahoma City is rising faster than most of the selected peers.
Starter homes rose about 1% over the 12 months ending August 2026, faster than 70% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | $120,549 (Aug 26) | +4.2% | ||||
| United States ref | $200,550 (Aug 26) | +2.2% | ||||
| San Francisco, CA | $932,784 (Aug 26) | 1st | +10.5% | 1st | 177% above peers | |
| El Paso, TX | $183,474 (Aug 26) | 8th | +3.6% | 2nd | 46% below peers | |
| Boston, MA | $549,311 (Aug 26) | 3rd | +1.1% | 3rd | 63% above peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | $125,593 (Aug 26) | 9th | +1.0% | 4th | 63% below peers | |
| Portland, OR | $376,831 (Aug 26) | 4th | -0.2% | 5th | 12% above peers | |
| Detroit, MI | $48,867 (Aug 26) | 11th | -1.0% | 6th | 86% below peers | |
| Seattle, WA | $555,481 (Aug 26) | 2nd | -2.1% | 7th | 65% above peers | |
| Washington, DC | $337,208 (Aug 26) | 6th | -3.0% | 8th | on par with peers | |
| Denver, CO | $349,618 (Aug 26) | 5th | -3.2% | 9th | 4% above peers | |
| Memphis, TN | $79,282 (Aug 26) | 10th | -3.3% | 10th | 76% below peers | |
| Las Vegas, NV | $298,344 (Aug 26) | 7th | -3.6% | 11th | 12% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is within the margin, but each of the last 3 annual releases moved the 5-year average the same way. Direction is a reliable early signal; its size is not.
Homeownership changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (58.9% then, 58.6% now; margin ±0.9pp). The newest releases lean downward: each of the last 3 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 65.8% | +0.2pp | |||||
| United States ref | 65.2% | ||||||
| Las Vegas, NV | 56.6% | 4th | +3.9pp | 1st | 12% above peers | ||
| Detroit, MI | 50.4% | 7th | +3.1pp | 2nd | on par with peers | ||
| El Paso, TX | 60.8% | 1st | +1.9pp | 3rd | 21% above peers | ||
| Boston, MA | 35.7% | 13th | +0.7pp | 4th | 29% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 38.2% | 12th | +0.6pp | 5th | 24% below peers | ||
| Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), KY | 60.7% | 2nd | +0.6pp | 6th | 21% above peers | ||
| Washington, DC | 41.5% | 11th | -0.1pp | 7th | 18% below peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 58.5% | 3rd | -0.4pp | 8th | 16% above peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 48.8% | 8th | -1.1pp | 9th | 3% below peers | ||
| Portland, OR | 52.0% | 6th | -1.4pp | 10th | 3% above peers | ||
| Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), TN | 52.4% | 5th | -1.5pp | 11th | 4% above peers | ||
| Memphis, TN | 44.9% | 9th | -1.7pp | 12th | 11% below peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 43.7% | 10th | -2.0pp | 13th | 13% below peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers.
Rent rose about 3% over the 12 months ending August 2026, faster than 60% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States ref | $1,948 (Aug 26) | +2.5% | ||||
| San Francisco, CA | $4,682 (Aug 26) | 1st | +25.2% | 1st | 170% above peers | |
| Detroit, MI | $1,341 (Aug 26) | 9th | +4.1% | 2nd | 23% below peers | |
| El Paso, TX | $1,519 (Aug 26) | 8th | +3.2% | 3rd | 12% below peers | |
| Boston, MA | $3,338 (Aug 26) | 2nd | +2.7% | 4th | 93% above peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | $1,282 (Aug 26) | 10th | +2.5% | 5th | 26% below peers | |
| Memphis, TN | $1,232 (Aug 26) | 11th | +1.3% | 6th | 29% below peers | |
| Portland, OR | $1,732 (Aug 26) | 6th | +0.9% | 7th | on par with peers | |
| Washington, DC | $2,517 (Aug 26) | 3rd | +0.3% | 8th | 45% above peers | |
| Seattle, WA | $2,234 (Aug 26) | 4th | +0.3% | 9th | 29% above peers | |
| Las Vegas, NV | $1,712 (Aug 26) | 7th | +0.2% | 10th | 1% below peers | |
| Denver, CO | $1,881 (Aug 26) | 5th | -0.4% | 11th | 9% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin, in the wrong direction for this metric.
Cost burden rose 2.4 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 29.1% to 31.5% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.1pp). That reverses the previous span, which went down between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys. That is movement in the wrong direction.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 27.3% | +1.4pp | |||||
| United States ref | 32.2% | +0.4pp | |||||
| Detroit, MI | 43.5% | 13th | -0.7pp | 1st | 20% above peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 34.5% | 3rd | -0.5pp | 2nd | 4% below peers | ||
| Boston, MA | 42.5% | 12th | -0.4pp | 3rd | 18% above peers | ||
| Washington, DC | 36.1% | 6th | -0.2pp | 4th | on par with peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 36.1% | 7th | +0.7pp | 5th | on par with peers | ||
| Las Vegas, NV | 39.9% | 10th | +1.1pp | 6th | 10% above peers | ||
| Memphis, TN | 41.8% | 11th | +1.4pp | 7th | 16% above peers | ||
| Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), KY | 30.7% | 1st | +1.2pp | 8th | 15% below peers | ||
| Portland, OR | 38.8% | 9th | +1.5pp | 9th | 7% above peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 35.6% | 4th | +1.7pp | 10th | 1% below peers | ||
| El Paso, TX | 36.0% | 5th | +2.2pp | 11th | on par with peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 31.5% | 2nd | +2.4pp | 12th | 13% below peers | ||
| Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), TN | 36.9% | 8th | +3.8pp | 13th | 2% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
No vehicle changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (6.1% then, 6.5% now; margin ±0.5pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 5.6% | +0.1pp | |||||
| United States ref | 8.3% | -0.3pp | |||||
| Detroit, MI | 20.1% | 10th | -3.6pp | 1st | 95% above peers | ||
| Las Vegas, NV | 8.9% | 4th | -1.1pp | 2nd | 14% below peers | ||
| Memphis, TN | 10.3% | 6th | -1.3pp | 3rd | on par with peers | ||
| Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), KY | 9.7% | 5th | -0.9pp | 4th | 6% below peers | ||
| El Paso, TX | 7.1% | 3rd | -0.4pp | 5th | 31% below peers | ||
| Portland, OR | 13.7% | 8th | -0.5pp | 6th | 33% above peers | ||
| Boston, MA | 33.2% | 12th | -1.0pp | 7th | 223% above peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 30.2% | 11th | -0.7pp | 8th | 193% above peers | ||
| Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), TN | 6.7% | 2nd | -0.0pp | 9th | 35% below peers | ||
| Washington, DC | 36.0% | 13th | +0.1pp | 10th | 249% above peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 10.3% | 7th | +0.5pp | 11th | on par with peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 19.0% | 9th | +1.2pp | 12th | 84% above peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 6.5% | 1st | +0.4pp | 13th | 37% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Uninsured fell 0.9 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 14.6% to 13.8% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.5pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 12.9% | -1.2pp | |||||
| United States ref | 8.4% | -0.4pp | |||||
| Portland, OR | 5.2% | 5th | -1.2pp | 1st | 30% below peers | ||
| Boston, MA | 2.9% | 1st | -0.6pp | 2nd | 61% below peers | ||
| Detroit, MI | 7.4% | 7th | -1.0pp | 3rd | on par with peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 3.3% | 2nd | -0.4pp | 4th | 56% below peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 13.8% | 11th | -0.9pp | 5th | 85% above peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 9.0% | 8th | -0.3pp | 6th | 22% above peers | ||
| Washington, DC | 3.6% | 3rd | -0.0pp | 7th | 51% below peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 4.2% | 4th | +0.0pp | 8th | 44% below peers | ||
| Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), TN | 12.8% | 9th | +0.7pp | 9th | 72% above peers | ||
| Memphis, TN | 14.7% | 12th | +1.0pp | 10th | 98% above peers | ||
| El Paso, TX | 20.6% | 13th | +1.6pp | 11th | 178% above peers | ||
| Las Vegas, NV | 13.4% | 10th | +1.1pp | 12th | 81% above peers | ||
| Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), KY | 6.0% | 6th | +0.6pp | 13th | 19% below peers |
Modeled estimate with no usable trend; the level is shown and no trend claims are made.
Adult obesity is about a quarter above the peer median.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 40.3% | |||
| United States ref | 33.4% | |||
| San Francisco, CA | 18.2% | 1st | 43% below peers | |
| Denver, CO | 23.2% | 2nd | 27% below peers | |
| Seattle, WA | 23.4% | 3rd | 26% below peers | |
| Washington, DC | 25.5% | 4th | 20% below peers | |
| Boston, MA | 27.3% | 5th | 14% below peers | |
| Portland, OR | 28.2% | 6th | 11% below peers | |
| Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), TN | 31.8% | 7th | on par with peers | |
| Las Vegas, NV | 33.9% | 8th | 7% above peers | |
| Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), KY | 36.1% | 9th | 14% above peers | |
| El Paso, TX | 39.5% | 10th | 24% above peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 39.8% | 11th | 25% above peers | |
| Detroit, MI | 45.0% | 12th | 42% above peers | |
| Memphis, TN | 45.1% | 13th | 42% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is within the margin, but each of the last 4 annual releases moved the 5-year average the same way. Direction is a reliable early signal; its size is not.
Child uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (7.1% then, 8.0% now; margin ±0.9pp). The newest releases lean upward: each of the last 4 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 8.2% | +0.2pp | |||||
| United States ref | 5.5% | +0.4pp | |||||
| Portland, OR | 1.9% | 1st | -0.9pp | 1st | 50% below peers | ||
| Detroit, MI | 2.8% | 6th | -0.4pp | 2nd | 28% below peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 8.0% | 9th | +0.9pp | 3rd | 106% above peers | ||
| El Paso, TX | 11.2% | 13th | +2.1pp | 4th | 188% above peers | ||
| Las Vegas, NV | 9.6% | 11th | +2.4pp | 5th | 148% above peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 5.7% | 8th | +1.5pp | 6th | 46% above peers | ||
| Memphis, TN | 8.7% | 10th | +2.4pp | 7th | 123% above peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 1.9% | 2nd | +0.5pp | 8th | 50% below peers | ||
| Washington, DC | 2.8% | 5th | +0.8pp | 9th | 29% below peers | ||
| Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), KY | 3.9% | 7th | +1.1pp | 10th | on par with peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 2.2% | 4th | +0.7pp | 11th | 43% below peers | ||
| Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), TN | 10.6% | 12th | +3.7pp | 12th | 172% above peers | ||
| Boston, MA | 2.0% | 3rd | +0.7pp | 13th | 48% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
College attainment rose 4.1 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 30.7% to 34.7% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.9pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 28.4% | +2.8pp | |||||
| United States ref | 35.7% | +3.5pp | |||||
| Detroit, MI | 18.1% | 13th | +2.8pp | 1st | 62% below peers | ||
| Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), TN | 48.0% | 7th | +6.9pp | 2nd | on par with peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 56.5% | 4th | +7.1pp | 3rd | 18% above peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 34.7% | 8th | +4.1pp | 4th | 28% below peers | ||
| Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), KY | 33.8% | 9th | +3.9pp | 5th | 30% below peers | ||
| Las Vegas, NV | 27.6% | 12th | +3.1pp | 6th | 42% below peers | ||
| El Paso, TX | 28.1% | 10th | +3.1pp | 7th | 41% below peers | ||
| Boston, MA | 54.9% | 5th | +5.2pp | 8th | 14% above peers | ||
| Washington, DC | 64.2% | 2nd | +5.7pp | 9th | 34% above peers | ||
| Memphis, TN | 28.0% | 11th | +1.9pp | 10th | 42% below peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 68.5% | 1st | +4.4pp | 11th | 42% above peers | ||
| Portland, OR | 53.8% | 6th | +3.3pp | 12th | 12% above peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 60.3% | 3rd | +2.3pp | 13th | 26% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Preschool enrollment changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (40.1% then, 39.4% now; margin ±3.8pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 40.5% | -2.6pp | |||||
| United States ref | 45.5% | ||||||
| El Paso, TX | 47.3% | 7th | +6.8pp | 1st | on par with peers | ||
| Memphis, TN | 39.9% | 8th | +2.7pp | 2nd | 16% below peers | ||
| Boston, MA | 65.1% | 4th | +4.0pp | 3rd | 38% above peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 70.3% | 3rd | +1.0pp | 4th | 49% above peers | ||
| Washington, DC | 79.0% | 1st | +0.3pp | 5th | 67% above peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 39.4% | 9th | -0.7pp | 6th | 17% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 73.2% | 2nd | -1.3pp | 7th | 55% above peers | ||
| Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), TN | 37.0% | 10th | -2.2pp | 8th | 22% below peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 52.5% | 6th | -3.2pp | 9th | 11% above peers | ||
| Portland, OR | 54.4% | 5th | -7.4pp | 10th | 15% above peers | ||
| Las Vegas, NV | 32.7% | 11th | -5.9pp | 11th | 31% below peers | ||
| Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), KY | 31.9% | 12th | -9.6pp | 12th | 33% below peers | ||
| Detroit, MI | 31.0% | 13th | -9.8pp | 13th | 35% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Disconnected youth changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (8.6% then, 8.2% now; margin ±1.7pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 7.9% | -0.1pp | |||||
| United States ref | 6.9% | +0.3pp | |||||
| Washington, DC | 5.2% | 4th | -1.5pp | 1st | 35% below peers | ||
| El Paso, TX | 8.0% | 7th | -0.9pp | 2nd | on par with peers | ||
| Boston, MA | 2.9% | 1st | -0.2pp | 3rd | 63% below peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 3.1% | 3rd | -0.2pp | 4th | 60% below peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 8.2% | 8th | -0.4pp | 5th | 3% above peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 8.4% | 9th | -0.4pp | 6th | 5% above peers | ||
| Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), TN | 5.7% | 6th | +0.3pp | 7th | 28% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 3.0% | 2nd | +0.2pp | 8th | 63% below peers | ||
| Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), KY | 8.5% | 10th | +0.7pp | 9th | 7% above peers | ||
| Portland, OR | 5.7% | 5th | +0.6pp | 10th | 28% below peers | ||
| Memphis, TN | 13.1% | 12th | +1.8pp | 11th | 64% above peers | ||
| Detroit, MI | 16.7% | 13th | +2.7pp | 12th | 109% above peers | ||
| Las Vegas, NV | 11.9% | 11th | +2.2pp | 13th | 50% above peers |
Below the state by 8.8 points in SY2026 (16.2% vs 25.0%). Since SY2017 the city moved -5.8 and the state -13.4, so the city gained 7.6 points of ground (floor 2). Excluded from the change: 2024 (shown on the chart, not used).
Oklahoma City's public school districts are 8.8 points below Oklahoma (16.2% vs 25.0%, SY2026) and have gained 7.6 points of ground on Oklahoma since 2017. Their own figure moved from 22.0% to 16.2% over that span (down 26% relative to the 2017 level); Oklahoma moved from 38.4% to 25.0%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2017 to 2026 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 25.0% | -13.4 pp | ||||
| Lawton, OK | 16.2% | 7th | -26.4 pp | 9th | 28% below peers | |
| Moore, OK | 28.2% | 3rd | -21.4 pp | 8th | 25% above peers | |
| Norman, OK | 29.5% | 2nd | -20.3 pp | 7th | 31% above peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 25.1% | 4th | -19.8 pp | 6th | 11% above peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 40.3% | 1st | -19.2 pp | 5th | 78% above peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 14.8% | 9th | -18.7 pp | 4th | 35% below peers | |
| Enid, OK | 22.6% | 5th | -16.7 pp | 3rd | on par with peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 16.3% | 6th | -7.1 pp | 2nd | 28% below peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 16.2% | 8th | -5.8 pp | 1st | 28% below peers |
Below the state by 9.6 points in SY2026 (21.4% vs 31.0%). Since SY2017 the city moved -3.4 and the state -9.0, so the city gained 5.6 points of ground (floor 2). Excluded from the change: 2024 (shown on the chart, not used).
Oklahoma City's public school districts are 9.6 points below Oklahoma (21.4% vs 31.0%, SY2026) and have gained 5.6 points of ground on Oklahoma since 2017. Their own figure moved from 24.8% to 21.4% over that span (down 14% relative to the 2017 level); Oklahoma moved from 40.0% to 31.0%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2017 to 2026 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 31.0% | -9.0 pp | ||||
| Lawton, OK | 20.8% | 8th | -23.1 pp | 9th | 32% below peers | |
| Enid, OK | 30.6% | 5th | -16.4 pp | 8th | on par with peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 46.9% | 1st | -15.2 pp | 7th | 53% above peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 18.4% | 9th | -14.6 pp | 6th | 40% below peers | |
| Norman, OK | 35.3% | 3rd | -14.3 pp | 5th | 15% above peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 31.4% | 4th | -14.1 pp | 4th | 3% above peers | |
| Moore, OK | 36.6% | 2nd | -14.1 pp | 3rd | 20% above peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 21.4% | 7th | -3.4 pp | 2nd | 30% below peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 21.7% | 6th | -2.9 pp | 1st | 29% below peers |
Below the state by 12.2 points in SY2026 (22.7% vs 34.9%). Since SY2017 the city moved -3.8 and the state -8.0, so the city gained 4.2 points of ground (floor 2).
Oklahoma City's public school districts are 12.2 points below Oklahoma (22.7% vs 34.9%, SY2026) and have gained 4.2 points of ground on Oklahoma since 2017. Their own figure moved from 26.5% to 22.7% over that span (down 14% relative to the 2017 level); Oklahoma moved from 42.9% to 34.9%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2017 to 2026 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 34.9% | -8.0 pp | ||||
| Lawton, OK | 17.0% | 8th | -22.5 pp | 9th | 46% below peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 16.4% | 9th | -20.3 pp | 8th | 48% below peers | |
| Enid, OK | 33.4% | 4th | -16.8 pp | 7th | 5% above peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 31.7% | 5th | -15.9 pp | 6th | on par with peers | |
| Moore, OK | 42.6% | 2nd | -13.8 pp | 5th | 34% above peers | |
| Norman, OK | 40.5% | 3rd | -9.3 pp | 4th | 28% above peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 54.4% | 1st | -7.8 pp | 3rd | 72% above peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 23.2% | 6th | -5.0 pp | 2nd | 27% below peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 22.7% | 7th | -3.8 pp | 1st | 28% below peers |
Below the state by 7.7 points in SY2025 (75.6% vs 83.3%). Since SY2018 the city moved -12.9 and the state -4.6, so the city lost 8.3 points of ground (floor 2).
Oklahoma City's public school districts are 7.7 points below Oklahoma (75.6% vs 83.3%, SY2025) and have lost 8.3 points of ground to Oklahoma since 2018. Their own figure moved from 88.5% to 75.6% over that span (down 15% relative to the 2018 level); Oklahoma moved from 87.9% to 83.3%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2018 to 2025 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 83.3% | -4.6 pp | ||||
| Midwest City, OK | 72.0% | 9th | -15.0 pp | 9th | 13% below peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 75.6% | 8th | -12.9 pp | 8th | 8% below peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 76.4% | 7th | -9.5 pp | 7th | 7% below peers | |
| Norman, OK | 80.0% | 6th | -9.1 pp | 6th | 3% below peers | |
| Moore, OK | 82.5% | 5th | -7.8 pp | 5th | on par with peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 82.7% | 4th | -6.6 pp | 4th | on par with peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 87.4% | 3rd | -3.8 pp | 3rd | 6% above peers | |
| Enid, OK | 88.7% | 2nd | -1.3 pp | 2nd | 8% above peers | |
| Lawton, OK | 97.0% | 1st | +8.8 pp | 1st | 18% above peers |
Below the state by 7.0 points in SY2026 (15.4% vs 22.4%). Since SY2017 the city moved -8.1 and the state -13.7, so the city gained 5.6 points of ground (floor 2). Excluded from the change: 2024 (shown on the chart, not used).
Oklahoma City's public school districts are 7 points below Oklahoma (15.4% vs 22.4%, SY2026) and have gained 5.6 points of ground on Oklahoma since 2017. Their own figure moved from 23.5% to 15.4% over that span (down 34% relative to the 2017 level); Oklahoma moved from 36.1% to 22.4%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2017 to 2026 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 22.4% | -13.7 pp | ||||
| Lawton, OK | 13.8% | 8th | -22.9 pp | 9th | 37% below peers | |
| Moore, OK | 28.4% | 2nd | -19.6 pp | 8th | 29% above peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 36.0% | 1st | -17.8 pp | 7th | 64% above peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 13.8% | 9th | -15.0 pp | 6th | 37% below peers | |
| Norman, OK | 28.3% | 3rd | -13.6 pp | 5th | 29% above peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 23.2% | 4th | -13.2 pp | 4th | 5% above peers | |
| Enid, OK | 22.0% | 5th | -12.5 pp | 3rd | on par with peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 15.7% | 6th | -9.1 pp | 2nd | 29% below peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 15.4% | 7th | -8.1 pp | 1st | 30% below peers |
Below the state by 6.5 points in SY2026 (15.9% vs 22.4%). Since SY2017 the city moved -4.2 and the state -8.3, so the city gained 4.1 points of ground (floor 2). Excluded from the change: 2024 (shown on the chart, not used).
Oklahoma City's public school districts are 6.5 points below Oklahoma (15.9% vs 22.4%, SY2026) and have gained 4.1 points of ground on Oklahoma since 2017. Their own figure moved from 20.1% to 15.9% over that span (down 21% relative to the 2017 level); Oklahoma moved from 30.7% to 22.4%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2017 to 2026 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 22.4% | -8.3 pp | ||||
| Lawton, OK | 12.9% | 9th | -19.2 pp | 9th | 34% below peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 32.9% | 1st | -19.0 pp | 8th | 68% above peers | |
| Moore, OK | 30.9% | 2nd | -12.3 pp | 7th | 58% above peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 13.2% | 8th | -8.7 pp | 6th | 33% below peers | |
| Norman, OK | 24.3% | 4th | -8.7 pp | 5th | 24% above peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 14.4% | 7th | -7.9 pp | 4th | 27% below peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 19.6% | 5th | -7.1 pp | 3rd | on par with peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 15.9% | 6th | -4.2 pp | 2nd | 19% below peers | |
| Enid, OK | 24.9% | 3rd | -3.9 pp | 1st | 27% above peers |
Below the state by 7.9 points in SY2026 (27.4% vs 35.3%). Since SY2017 the city moved -2.1 and the state -5.3, so the city gained 3.2 points of ground (floor 2).
Oklahoma City's public school districts are 7.9 points below Oklahoma (27.4% vs 35.3%, SY2026) and have gained 3.2 points of ground on Oklahoma since 2017. Their own figure moved from 29.5% to 27.4% over that span (down 7% relative to the 2017 level); Oklahoma moved from 40.6% to 35.3%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2017 to 2026 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 35.3% | -5.3 pp | ||||
| Lawton, OK | 15.9% | 9th | -19.6 pp | 9th | 48% below peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 50.2% | 1st | -12.8 pp | 8th | 63% above peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 30.8% | 5th | -11.4 pp | 7th | on par with peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 24.3% | 8th | -10.9 pp | 6th | 21% below peers | |
| Moore, OK | 35.6% | 4th | -9.8 pp | 5th | 16% above peers | |
| Enid, OK | 35.7% | 3rd | -9.1 pp | 4th | 16% above peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 25.3% | 7th | -5.7 pp | 3rd | 18% below peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 27.4% | 6th | -2.1 pp | 2nd | 11% below peers | |
| Norman, OK | 43.4% | 2nd | +0.5 pp | 1st | 41% above peers |
Below the state by 12.4 points in SY2025 (66.9% vs 79.3%). Since SY2018 the city moved -18.1 and the state -7.8, so the city lost 10.3 points of ground (floor 2).
Oklahoma City's public school districts are 12.4 points below Oklahoma (66.9% vs 79.3%, SY2025) and have lost 10.3 points of ground to Oklahoma since 2018. Their own figure moved from 85.0% to 66.9% over that span (down 21% relative to the 2018 level); Oklahoma moved from 87.1% to 79.3%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2018 to 2025 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 79.3% | -7.8 pp | ||||
| Midwest City, OK | 64.5% | 9th | -20.8 pp | 9th | 22% below peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 64.9% | 8th | -18.8 pp | 8th | 21% below peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 66.9% | 7th | -18.1 pp | 7th | 19% below peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 79.9% | 6th | -9.8 pp | 6th | 3% below peers | |
| Norman, OK | 82.3% | 5th | -5.2 pp | 5th | on par with peers | |
| Moore, OK | 83.9% | 4th | -4.7 pp | 4th | 2% above peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 87.3% | 3rd | -3.5 pp | 3rd | 6% above peers | |
| Enid, OK | 94.0% | 1st | +3.6 pp | 2nd | 14% above peers | |
| Lawton, OK | 89.3% | 2nd | +3.9 pp | 1st | 9% above peers |
Above the state by 12.0 points in SY2022 (22.8 vs 10.8). Since SY2018 the city moved +3.7 and the state +1.9, so the city gained 1.8 points of ground (floor 2).
Oklahoma City's public school districts are 12 per 100 students above Oklahoma (22.8 per 100 students vs 10.8 per 100 students, SY2022) and have held about even with Oklahoma since 2018. Their own figure moved from 19.1 per 100 students to 22.8 per 100 students over that span (up 19% relative to the 2018 level); Oklahoma moved from 8.9 per 100 students to 10.8 per 100 students.
| Place | Latestper 100 students | Today's rank | Change2018 to 2022 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 10.8 | +1.9 | ||||
| Moore, OK | 12.3 | 6th | +4.2 | 9th | 4% above peers | |
| Lawton, OK | 5.1 | 1st | +3.8 | 8th | 57% below peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 22.8 | 9th | +3.7 | 7th | 93% above peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 6.4 | 2nd | +2.4 | 6th | 46% below peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 9.5 | 3rd | +2.3 | 5th | 19% below peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 16.1 | 7th | +2.0 | 4th | 36% above peers | |
| Norman, OK | 10.8 | 4th | +2.0 | 3rd | 8% below peers | |
| Enid, OK | 11.8 | 5th | +1.0 | 2nd | on par with peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 18.1 | 8th | -1.4 | 1st | 53% above peers |
Below the state by 12.1 points in SY2025 (24.9% vs 37.0%). Since SY2018 the city moved +2.0 and the state -1.0, so the city gained 3.0 points of ground (floor 2).
Oklahoma City's public school districts are 12.1 points below Oklahoma (24.9% vs 37.0%, SY2025) and have gained 3 points of ground on Oklahoma since 2018. Their own figure moved from 22.9% to 24.9% over that span (up 9% relative to the 2018 level); Oklahoma moved from 38.0% to 37.0%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2018 to 2025 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 37.0% | -1.0 pp | ||||
| Edmond, OK | 61.2% | 1st | -9.8 pp | 9th | 71% above peers | |
| Enid, OK | 35.8% | 5th | -4.3 pp | 8th | on par with peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 26.8% | 8th | -3.3 pp | 7th | 25% below peers | |
| Norman, OK | 51.0% | 2nd | -2.8 pp | 6th | 42% above peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 27.7% | 7th | -2.5 pp | 5th | 23% below peers | |
| Lawton, OK | 31.5% | 6th | +0.9 pp | 4th | 12% below peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 24.9% | 9th | +2.0 pp | 3rd | 30% below peers | |
| Moore, OK | 48.2% | 3rd | +2.2 pp | 2nd | 35% above peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 43.0% | 4th | +4.0 pp | 1st | 20% above peers |
Below the state by 8.3 points in SY2025 (9.7% vs 18.0%). Since SY2018 the city moved -1.7 and the state -4.0, so the city gained 2.3 points of ground (floor 2).
Oklahoma City's public school districts are 8.3 points below Oklahoma (9.7% vs 18.0%, SY2025) and have gained 2.3 points of ground on Oklahoma since 2018. Their own figure moved from 11.4% to 9.7% over that span (down 15% relative to the 2018 level); Oklahoma moved from 22.0% to 18.0%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2018 to 2025 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 18.0% | -4.0 pp | ||||
| Edmond, OK | 37.9% | 1st | -14.8 pp | 9th | 175% above peers | |
| Enid, OK | 11.8% | 7th | -11.3 pp | 8th | 14% below peers | |
| Norman, OK | 28.4% | 2nd | -9.5 pp | 7th | 106% above peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 9.7% | 8th | -6.3 pp | 6th | 30% below peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 13.8% | 5th | -5.5 pp | 5th | on par with peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 19.0% | 4th | -4.0 pp | 4th | 38% above peers | |
| Lawton, OK | 13.0% | 6th | -3.6 pp | 3rd | 6% below peers | |
| Moore, OK | 25.7% | 3rd | -3.5 pp | 2nd | 86% above peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 9.7% | 9th | -1.7 pp | 1st | 30% below peers |
Below the state by 7.0 points in SY2026 (12.9% vs 19.9%). Since SY2022 the city moved -5.6 and the state -5.3, so the city lost 0.3 points of ground (floor 2).
Oklahoma City's public school districts are 7 points below Oklahoma (12.9% vs 19.9%, SY2026) and have held about even with Oklahoma since 2022. Their own figure moved from 18.5% to 12.9% over that span (down 30% relative to the 2022 level); Oklahoma moved from 25.2% to 19.9%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2022 to 2026 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 19.9% | -5.3 pp | ||||
| Norman, OK | 27.4% | 3rd | -17.3 pp | 9th | 38% above peers | |
| Lawton, OK | 14.2% | 7th | -9.5 pp | 8th | 28% below peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 10.1% | 9th | -8.7 pp | 7th | 49% below peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 43.7% | 1st | -8.3 pp | 6th | 121% above peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 17.1% | 6th | -7.1 pp | 5th | 14% below peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 12.9% | 8th | -5.6 pp | 4th | 35% below peers | |
| Enid, OK | 19.8% | 5th | -4.2 pp | 3rd | on par with peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 29.3% | 2nd | -1.0 pp | 2nd | 48% above peers | |
| Moore, OK | 23.1% | 4th | +0.5 pp | 1st | 17% above peers |
Below the state by 3.2 points in SY2026 (37.4% vs 40.6%). Since SY2022 the city moved -3.0 and the state -5.6, so the city gained 2.6 points of ground (floor 2).
Oklahoma City's public school districts are 3.2 points below Oklahoma (37.4% vs 40.6%, SY2026) and have gained 2.6 points of ground on Oklahoma since 2022. Their own figure moved from 40.4% to 37.4% over that span (down 7% relative to the 2022 level); Oklahoma moved from 46.2% to 40.6%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2022 to 2026 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 40.6% | -5.6 pp | ||||
| Midwest City, OK | 30.8% | 9th | -15.7 pp | 9th | 26% below peers | |
| Enid, OK | 41.4% | 5th | -13.1 pp | 8th | on par with peers | |
| Norman, OK | 49.2% | 3rd | -10.6 pp | 7th | 19% above peers | |
| Lawton, OK | 32.3% | 8th | -9.1 pp | 6th | 22% below peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 65.2% | 1st | -7.1 pp | 5th | 57% above peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 38.4% | 6th | -4.4 pp | 4th | 7% below peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 37.4% | 7th | -3.0 pp | 3rd | 10% below peers | |
| Moore, OK | 46.9% | 4th | -2.2 pp | 2nd | 13% above peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 54.3% | 2nd | +4.7 pp | 1st | 31% above peers |
Below the state by 21.1 points in SY2025 (57.6% vs 78.7%). Since SY2018 the city moved -15.3 and the state -4.7, so the city lost 10.6 points of ground (floor 2).
Oklahoma City's public school districts are 21.1 points below Oklahoma (57.6% vs 78.7%, SY2025) and have lost 10.6 points of ground to Oklahoma since 2018. Their own figure moved from 72.9% to 57.6% over that span (down 21% relative to the 2018 level); Oklahoma moved from 83.4% to 78.7%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2018 to 2025 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 78.7% | -4.7 pp | ||||
| Tulsa, OK | 55.2% | 9th | -18.0 pp | 9th | 33% below peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 64.4% | 7th | -16.3 pp | 8th | 22% below peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 57.6% | 8th | -15.3 pp | 7th | 30% below peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 85.8% | 4th | -7.0 pp | 6th | 4% above peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 80.6% | 6th | +0.0 pp | 5th | 3% below peers | |
| Lawton, OK | 82.8% | 5th | +3.6 pp | 4th | on par with peers | |
| Norman, OK | 88.1% | 3rd | +4.7 pp | 3rd | 6% above peers | |
| Moore, OK | 88.6% | 2nd | +8.8 pp | 2nd | 7% above peers | |
| Enid, OK | 93.9% | 1st | +14.3 pp | 1st | 13% above peers |
Above the state by 0.5 points in SY2024 (82.7% vs 82.2%). Since SY2017 the city moved +2.7 and the state -0.7, so the city gained 3.4 points of ground (floor 2).
Oklahoma City's public school districts are 0.5 points above Oklahoma (82.7% vs 82.2%, SY2024) and have gained 3.4 points of ground on Oklahoma since 2017. Their own figure moved from 80.0% to 82.7% over that span (up 3% relative to the 2017 level); Oklahoma moved from 82.9% to 82.2%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2017 to 2024 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 82.2% | -0.7 pp | ||||
| Tulsa, OK | 77.8% | 9th | -5.1 pp | 9th | 9% below peers | |
| Norman, OK | 83.9% | 6th | -4.4 pp | 8th | 1% below peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 90.8% | 2nd | -2.8 pp | 7th | 7% above peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 91.5% | 1st | +0.2 pp | 6th | 8% above peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 85.6% | 4th | +0.5 pp | 5th | 1% above peers | |
| Lawton, OK | 81.2% | 8th | +0.9 pp | 4th | 5% below peers | |
| Enid, OK | 85.1% | 5th | +2.3 pp | 3rd | on par with peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 82.7% | 7th | +2.7 pp | 2nd | 3% below peers | |
| Moore, OK | 88.7% | 3rd | +4.6 pp | 1st | 4% above peers |
Below the state by 2.2 points in SY2025 (51.8% vs 54.0%). Since SY2018 the city moved +10.2 and the state +11.4, so the city lost 1.2 points of ground (floor 2).
Oklahoma City's public school districts are 2.2 points below Oklahoma (51.8% vs 54.0%, SY2025) and have held about even with Oklahoma since 2018. Their own figure moved from 41.6% to 51.8% over that span (up 25% relative to the 2018 level); Oklahoma moved from 42.6% to 54.0%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2018 to 2025 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 54.0% | +11.4 pp | ||||
| Moore, OK | 44.6% | 9th | -5.5 pp | 9th | 18% below peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 59.3% | 3rd | -4.5 pp | 8th | 10% above peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 48.1% | 8th | +1.5 pp | 7th | 11% below peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 54.1% | 5th | +2.7 pp | 6th | on par with peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 51.8% | 7th | +10.2 pp | 5th | 4% below peers | |
| Lawton, OK | 52.7% | 6th | +11.1 pp | 4th | 3% below peers | |
| Norman, OK | 60.2% | 2nd | +14.5 pp | 3rd | 11% above peers | |
| Enid, OK | 62.1% | 1st | +18.0 pp | 2nd | 15% above peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 57.6% | 4th | +25.4 pp | 1st | 6% above peers |
A real change beyond the survey margin; neither direction is inherently better for this metric.
Population rose about 8% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 643,692 to 697,125 - more than the combined survey margin (±279).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma City, OK | 697,125 | 4th | +8% | 1st | 2% above peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 754,195 | 2nd | +4% | 2nd | 11% above peers | ||
| Las Vegas, NV | 660,400 | 9th | +4% | 3rd | 3% below peers | ||
| Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), TN | 690,130 | 5th | +4% | 4th | 1% above peers | ||
| Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), KY | 631,818 | 12th | +2% | 5th | 7% below peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 718,877 | 3rd | +2% | 6th | 6% above peers | ||
| El Paso, TX | 680,130 | 7th | +0% | 7th | on par with peers | ||
| Portland, OR | 641,165 | 10th | -1% | 8th | 6% below peers | ||
| Washington, DC | 681,294 | 6th | -2% | 9th | on par with peers | ||
| Boston, MA | 666,442 | 8th | -3% | 10th | 2% below peers | ||
| Memphis, TN | 618,980 | 13th | -5% | 11th | 9% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 830,235 | 1st | -5% | 12th | 22% above peers | ||
| Detroit, MI | 638,530 | 11th | -5% | 13th | 6% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Single-parent changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (34.4% then, 34.6% now; margin ±2.1pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 31.0% | -0.6pp | |||||
| United States ref | 29.9% | -0.2pp | |||||
| Portland, OR | 31.3% | 10th | +2.8pp | 1st | 17% below peers | ||
| El Paso, TX | 37.6% | 7th | +1.6pp | 2nd | on par with peers | ||
| Las Vegas, NV | 38.0% | 6th | +1.6pp | 3rd | 1% above peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 21.4% | 12th | +0.6pp | 4th | 43% below peers | ||
| Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), KY | 40.5% | 5th | +0.6pp | 5th | 8% above peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 30.9% | 11th | +0.3pp | 6th | 18% below peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 34.6% | 9th | +0.2pp | 7th | 8% below peers | ||
| Memphis, TN | 59.9% | 2nd | -0.2pp | 8th | 59% above peers | ||
| Detroit, MI | 67.1% | 1st | -1.0pp | 9th | 79% above peers | ||
| Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), TN | 36.3% | 8th | -0.9pp | 10th | 3% below peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 21.1% | 13th | -1.0pp | 11th | 44% below peers | ||
| Washington, DC | 45.3% | 3rd | -2.3pp | 12th | 21% above peers | ||
| Boston, MA | 42.6% | 4th | -3.9pp | 13th | 13% above peers |
A real change beyond the survey margin; neither direction is inherently better for this metric.
Working parents rose 4.6 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 64.2% to 68.8% - more than the combined survey margin (±4.5pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 64.1% | +1.3pp | |||||
| United States ref | 68.1% | +1.9pp | |||||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 68.8% | 9th | +4.6pp | 1st | 1% below peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 69.9% | 6th | +3.8pp | 2nd | 1% above peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 72.9% | 4th | +3.8pp | 3rd | 5% above peers | ||
| Washington, DC | 77.5% | 2nd | +1.4pp | 4th | 12% above peers | ||
| Boston, MA | 78.6% | 1st | +0.9pp | 5th | 13% above peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 73.9% | 3rd | +0.8pp | 6th | 7% above peers | ||
| Portland, OR | 70.6% | 5th | +0.1pp | 7th | 2% above peers | ||
| Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), TN | 69.3% | 7th | -0.3pp | 8th | on par with peers | ||
| Memphis, TN | 66.7% | 10th | -1.8pp | 9th | 4% below peers | ||
| Las Vegas, NV | 62.4% | 11th | -2.0pp | 10th | 10% below peers | ||
| El Paso, TX | 58.5% | 13th | -2.2pp | 11th | 16% below peers | ||
| Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), KY | 69.0% | 8th | -4.6pp | 12th | on par with peers | ||
| Detroit, MI | 61.8% | 12th | -5.1pp | 13th | 11% below peers |