DataWorks Commons
Pittsburgh, PA
← All cities

Pittsburgh, PA

See all data for this place → See Pittsburgh on Skyline →
307,632 people (2025) 250k-1m Northeast

Bright spots 10 indicators

Where Pittsburgh, PA shows a real improvement in recent years, or stands clearly ahead of its peers. How this is calculated →
Household income
Median household income
$65,742
2020-24
▲ 35%
relative change
$48,711 in 2019
Real improvement Trailing peers
Learn more ↓
No vehicle
Households without a vehicle
20.6%
2020-24
▼ 12%
relative change
23.3% in 2019
Real improvement Trailing peers
Learn more ↓
Broadband
Households with a broadband internet subscription
90.6%
2020-24
▲ 11%
relative change
81.8% in 2019
Real improvement Trailing peers
Learn more ↓
 ★
College attainment
Adults with a bachelor's degree or higher
49.1%
2020-24
▲ 10%
relative change
44.6% in 2019
Real improvement Leading peers
Learn more ↓
 ★
Disconnected youth
Teens not in school and not working
3.7%
2020-24
▲ 5%
relative change
3.6% in 2019
Turning down (early signal) Leading peers
Learn more ↓
 ★
Uninsured
People without health insurance
4.8%
2020-24
▼ 9%
relative change
5.3% in 2019
Turning down (early signal) Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Child uninsured
Children without health insurance
3.5%
2020-24
▲ 5%
relative change
3.3% in 2019
No measurable change Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Cost burden
Housing cost-burdened households
33.6%
2020-24
▲ 1%
relative change
33.3% in 2019
No measurable change Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Preschool enrollment
Children ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool
50.9%
2020-24
▼ <1%
relative change
51.3% in 2019
No measurable change Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Homicide
Homicide rate
35 homicides
12 mo to Jun 2026
▲ 30%
relative change
27 in the prior 12 months
Real, sustained progress  
Learn more ↓

What needs attention 8 indicators

Where Pittsburgh, PA shows a real worsening in recent years, or trails its peers clearly. How this is calculated →
Child poverty
Share of children below the poverty level
30.8%
2020-24
▲ 14%
relative change
27.2% in 2019
Worsening Trailing peers
Learn more ↓
Property crime
Property crime rate
2,847 /100k
Jun 2026
▼ 8%
relative change
3,084 a year earlier
Dropping too slowly  
Learn more ↓
Vehicle theft
Motor vehicle theft rate
379 /100k
Jun 2026
▼ 7%
relative change
406 a year earlier
Dropping too slowly  
Learn more ↓
Unemployment
Unemployment rate
3.7%
Jul 2026
▼ 3%
relative change
3.8% a year earlier
Dropping too slowly Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Inequality
Income inequality (Gini index)
0.52
2020-24
flat
relative change
0.52 in 2019
No measurable change Trailing peers
Learn more ↓
Poverty
Share of people below the poverty level
20.1%
2020-24
▼ 2%
relative change
20.5% in 2019
No measurable change Trailing peers
Learn more ↓
SNAP
Households receiving SNAP
16.5%
2019-23
▼ 4%
relative change
17.3% in 2018
No measurable change Trailing peers
Learn more ↓
Homeownership
Homeownership rate
47.7%
2020-24
▲ 1%
relative change
47.2% in 2019
No measurable change Trailing peers
Learn more ↓

Big moves & big gaps 5 indicators

Real movement and big differences from peers, where neither direction is simply good or bad. Biggest relative change first; big-gap cards come last. How this is calculated →
Rent
Typical asking rent
$1,545
Aug 2026
▲ 4%
relative change
$1,492 a year earlier
Rising recently Among the lowest of peers
Learn more ↓
Starter homes
Starter home value (bottom tier)
$140,307
Aug 2026
▼ 1%
relative change
$141,954 a year earlier
Falling recently Among the lowest of peers
Learn more ↓
Home value
Typical home value
$239,865
Aug 2026
▼ <1%
relative change
$242,203 a year earlier
Falling recently Among the lowest of peers
Learn more ↓
Single-parent
Children in single-parent families
42.6%
2020-24
low
vs peers
44.7% in 2019
No measurable change Among the lowest of peers
Learn more ↓
Children
Children's share of the population
14.6%
2020-24
low
vs peers
15.1% in 2019
No measurable change Among the lowest of peers
Learn more ↓

All indicators

Public Safety 4 indicators
Public Safety

Violent crime rate

▼ Lower is better Improving recently
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Violent crime fell about 2% over the 12 months ending June 2026, slower than 54% of similar-size cities.

Broader trend
Multi-year view: violent crime fell about 1% a year from 2021 to 2026, slower than 73% of similar-size cities. The change does not yet pass the noise and consistency checks, so treat it as a raw signal.
Longer view
Violent crime fell about 2% a year from 2018 to 2026.
Latest
Most recent monthly reading: 504 in June 2026, down from 513 a year earlier.
504 per 100k
2018June 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 27 similar-size cities by change rank
Each place's latest 12 months compares against its prior 12. significant improvement · significant worsening · within chance fluctuation for counts this size (Poisson test at 90%; these are administrative tallies, so the test covers event randomness, not survey error). Reporting practices vary by agency, so comparisons are indicative, not definitive; see crime data cautions.
Place Latestper 100k Changelast 12 months Sig. Change rank History
U.S. (RTCI sample) ref 456 (Apr 26) -9.3%
Greensboro, NC 578 (Jul 26) -29.9% 1st
Lubbock, TX 525 (Jul 26) -26.0% 2nd
Newark, NJ 417 (Jul 26) -21.1% 3rd
Laredo, TX 277 (Jul 26) -18.4% 4th
Lexington, KY 304 (Apr 26) -12.9% 5th
Jersey City, NJ 470 (Jul 26) -11.3% 6th
Corpus Christi, TX 716 (Jun 26) -11.2% 7th
Stockton, CA 978 (Jul 26) -9.3% 8th
Urban Honolulu, HI 188 (Jul 26) -7.5% 9th
Fort Wayne, IN 267 (Jul 26) -4.9% 10th
Saint Paul, MN 491 (Jul 26) -4.7% 11th
Durham, NC 535 (Jul 26) -4.7% 12th
St. Louis, MO 1,217 (Jul 26) -4.4% 13th
Cincinnati, OH 833 (Apr 26) -2.6% 14th
Pittsburgh, PA 504 (Jun 26) -1.9% 15th
Chandler, AZ 118 (Jul 26) -1.5% 16th
Chula Vista, CA 365 (Jul 26) -1.5% 17th
Irvine, CA 77 (Jul 26) -1.2% 18th
Gilbert, AZ 123 (Jul 26) -0.8% 19th
Madison, WI 227 (Jul 26) +0.2% 20th
Anaheim, CA 548 (Jul 26) +0.6% 21st
Plano, TX 145 (Jul 26) +1.0% 22nd
Lincoln, NE 404 (Jul 26) +1.9% 23rd
Reno, NV 512 (May 26) +6.8% 24th
Riverside, CA 586 (Jul 26) +7.6% 25th
Buffalo, NY 702 (May 26) +8.9% 26th
North Las Vegas, NV 367 (Jun 26) +15.1% 27th
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Because this metric moves monthly, each listed city also held or improved over its own most recent 12 months (shown on each row), and the list is ordered by that recent movement. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Tucson, AZ down about 27% over the 12 months ending July 2026 · sustained: down about 5% a year · 2021-2026
  • Arlington, TX down about 19% over the 12 months ending July 2026 · sustained: down about 7% a year · 2021-2026
  • Miami, FL down about 16% over the 12 months ending July 2026 · sustained: down about 8% a year · 2021-2026
Real-Time Crime Index through 2026-05 administrative trend: robust fit about this metric
Public Safety

Property crime rate

▼ Lower is better Improving recently, trailing peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Property crime fell about 8% over the 12 months ending June 2026, slower than 69% of similar-size cities.

Broader trend
Multi-year view: property crime rose about 12% a year from 2021 to 2026. That is movement in the wrong direction.
Longer view
Property crime rose less than 1%% a year from 2018 to 2026.
Latest
Most recent monthly reading: 2,847 in June 2026, down from 3,084 a year earlier.
Needs attention 2,847 per 100k
2018June 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 27 similar-size cities by change rank
Each place's latest 12 months compares against its prior 12. significant improvement · significant worsening · within chance fluctuation for counts this size (Poisson test at 90%; these are administrative tallies, so the test covers event randomness, not survey error). Reporting practices vary by agency, so comparisons are indicative, not definitive; see crime data cautions.
Place Latestper 100k Changelast 12 months Sig. Change rank History
U.S. (RTCI sample) ref 1,987 (Apr 26) -12.2%
Irvine, CA 951 (Jul 26) -28.0% 1st
Reno, NV 1,827 (May 26) -24.9% 2nd
Greensboro, NC 2,445 (Jul 26) -22.4% 3rd
Lubbock, TX 2,001 (Jul 26) -19.3% 4th
Laredo, TX 994 (Jul 26) -18.9% 5th
Newark, NJ 1,531 (Jul 26) -18.6% 6th
Urban Honolulu, HI 1,362 (Jul 26) -18.2% 7th
Chandler, AZ 1,146 (Jul 26) -16.1% 8th
Plano, TX 1,114 (Jul 26) -15.5% 9th
Fort Wayne, IN 1,686 (Jul 26) -14.4% 10th
Lincoln, NE 1,807 (Jul 26) -13.5% 11th
Gilbert, AZ 843 (Jul 26) -13.1% 12th
Anaheim, CA 1,706 (Jul 26) -12.7% 13th
Riverside, CA 2,144 (Jul 26) -12.3% 14th
Jersey City, NJ 1,697 (Jul 26) -12.2% 15th
Lexington, KY 2,110 (Jul 26) -11.1% 16th
Corpus Christi, TX 2,573 (Jun 26) -10.5% 17th
Cincinnati, OH 3,646 (Jul 26) -7.8% 18th
Pittsburgh, PA 2,847 (Jun 26) -7.7% 19th
Stockton, CA 2,241 (Jul 26) -7.4% 20th
Durham, NC 3,535 (Jul 26) -6.6% 21st
North Las Vegas, NV 1,593 (Jun 26) -6.1% 22nd
St. Louis, MO 4,964 (Jul 26) -5.3% 23rd
Chula Vista, CA 1,080 (Jul 26) -1.4% 24th
Madison, WI 1,956 (Jul 26) -1.3% 25th
Saint Paul, MN 2,766 (Jul 26) +1.1% 26th
Buffalo, NY 3,445 (May 26) +1.3% 27th
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Because this metric moves monthly, each listed city also held or improved over its own most recent 12 months (shown on each row), and the list is ordered by that recent movement. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Reno, NV down about 25% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 6% a year · 2021-2026
  • Urban Honolulu, HI down about 18% over the 12 months ending July 2026 · sustained: down about 11% a year · 2021-2026
  • Glendale, AZ down about 15% over the 12 months ending June 2026 · sustained: down about 7% a year · 2021-2026
Real-Time Crime Index through 2026-05 administrative trend: robust fit about this metric
Public Safety

Homicide rate

▼ Lower is better Worsening recently, faster than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Homicides rose about 30% over the 12 months ending June 2026, faster than 85% of similar-size cities.

Broader trend
Multi-year view: homicide fell about 11% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 58% of similar-size cities. Pittsburgh started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
Longer view
Homicide fell about 5% a year from 2018 to 2026.
Latest
Most recent reading: 35 homicides in the 12 months ending June 2026, up from 27 in the prior 12 months. That is 11 per 100,000 residents; peer comparisons use the rate.
Bright spot 35 homicides
2018June 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 27 similar-size cities by change rank
Each place's latest 12 months compares against its prior 12. significant improvement · significant worsening · within chance fluctuation for counts this size (Poisson test at 90%; these are administrative tallies, so the test covers event randomness, not survey error). Reporting practices vary by agency, so comparisons are indicative, not definitive; see crime data cautions.
Place Latestper 100k Changelast 12 months Sig. Change rank History
U.S. (RTCI sample) ref 6 (Apr 26) -17.8%
Irvine, CA 0 (Jul 26) -100.0% 1st
North Las Vegas, NV 0 (Jun 26) -95.8% 2nd
Reno, NV 0 (May 26) -94.4% 3rd
Plano, TX 0 (Jul 26) -66.5% 4th
Corpus Christi, TX 3 (Jun 26) -52.4% 5th
Buffalo, NY 8 (May 26) -41.6% 6th
Lincoln, NE 1 (Jul 26) -40.1% 7th
Greensboro, NC 8 (Jul 26) -40.0% 8th
Lubbock, TX 3 (Jul 26) -39.9% 9th
Newark, NJ 6 (Jul 26) -38.7% 10th
Laredo, TX 2 (Jul 26) -37.4% 11th
Cincinnati, OH 15 (Jul 26) -31.3% 12th
Fort Wayne, IN 10 (Jul 26) -22.2% 13th
Durham, NC 9 (Jul 26) -22.2% 14th
Stockton, CA 11 (Jul 26) -14.3% 15th
Madison, WI 2 (Jul 26) -14.3% 16th
Lexington, KY 6 (Apr 26) -12.6% 17th
Anaheim, CA 3 (Jul 26) -9.9% 18th
Jersey City, NJ 3 (Jul 26) -9.1% 19th
St. Louis, MO 51 (Jul 26) +5.2% 20th
Urban Honolulu, HI 2 (Jul 26) +5.5% 21st
Saint Paul, MN 7 (Jul 26) +11.1% 22nd
Pittsburgh, PA 11 (Jun 26) +29.6% 23rd
Chandler, AZ 1 (Jul 26) +50.5% 24th
Chula Vista, CA 3 (Jul 26) +75.2% 25th
Riverside, CA 5 (Jul 26) +87.1% 26th
Gilbert, AZ 3 (Jul 26) +899.7% 27th
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Because this metric moves monthly, each listed city also held or improved over its own most recent 12 months (shown on each row), and the list is ordered by that recent movement. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Newark, NJ down about 39% over the 12 months ending July 2026 · sustained: down about 13% a year · 2021-2026
  • Baltimore, MD down about 32% over the 12 months ending July 2026 · sustained: down about 16% a year · 2021-2026
  • Columbus, OH down about 29% over the 12 months ending June 2026 · sustained: down about 13% a year · 2021-2026
Real-Time Crime Index through 2026-06 administrative trend: robust fit about this metric
Public Safety

Motor vehicle theft rate

▼ Lower is better Improving recently, trailing peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Vehicle theft fell about 7% over the 12 months ending June 2026, slower than 85% of similar-size cities.

Broader trend
Multi-year view: vehicle theft rose about 24% a year from 2021 to 2026. That is movement in the wrong direction.
Longer view
Vehicle theft rose about 9% a year from 2018 to 2026.
Latest
Most recent monthly reading: 379 in June 2026, down from 406 a year earlier.
Needs attention 379 per 100k
2018June 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 27 similar-size cities by change rank
Each place's latest 12 months compares against its prior 12. significant improvement · significant worsening · within chance fluctuation for counts this size (Poisson test at 90%; these are administrative tallies, so the test covers event randomness, not survey error). Reporting practices vary by agency, so comparisons are indicative, not definitive; see crime data cautions.
Place Latestper 100k Changelast 12 months Sig. Change rank History
U.S. (RTCI sample) ref 303 (Apr 26) -22.2%
Plano, TX 63 (Jul 26) -42.6% 1st
Cincinnati, OH 614 (Jul 26) -32.3% 2nd
Laredo, TX 98 (Jul 26) -31.8% 3rd
North Las Vegas, NV 431 (Jun 26) -30.6% 4th
Greensboro, NC 389 (Jul 26) -30.1% 5th
Gilbert, AZ 44 (Jul 26) -29.2% 6th
Reno, NV 238 (May 26) -27.7% 7th
Riverside, CA 292 (Jul 26) -26.5% 8th
Stockton, CA 368 (Jul 26) -25.5% 9th
Durham, NC 451 (Jul 26) -23.9% 10th
Newark, NJ 597 (Jul 26) -20.7% 11th
Chula Vista, CA 203 (Jul 26) -20.7% 12th
Lubbock, TX 183 (Jul 26) -19.2% 13th
Lincoln, NE 203 (Jul 26) -18.7% 14th
Buffalo, NY 413 (May 26) -17.9% 15th
Irvine, CA 50 (Jul 26) -16.7% 16th
Anaheim, CA 252 (Jul 26) -14.9% 17th
Chandler, AZ 74 (Jul 26) -14.1% 18th
Fort Wayne, IN 168 (Jul 26) -13.6% 19th
Lexington, KY 249 (Jul 26) -9.2% 20th
Urban Honolulu, HI 238 (Jul 26) -7.9% 21st
Saint Paul, MN 392 (Jul 26) -7.1% 22nd
Pittsburgh, PA 379 (Jun 26) -6.7% 23rd
St. Louis, MO 1,174 (Jul 26) -4.1% 24th
Jersey City, NJ 272 (Jul 26) -2.6% 25th
Corpus Christi, TX 317 (Jun 26) +1.9% 26th
Madison, WI 120 (Jul 26) +12.0% 27th
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Because this metric moves monthly, each listed city also held or improved over its own most recent 12 months (shown on each row), and the list is ordered by that recent movement. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Boston, MA down about 44% over the 12 months ending July 2026 · sustained: down about 10% a year · 2021-2026
  • Plano, TX down about 43% over the 12 months ending July 2026 · sustained: down about 12% a year · 2021-2026
  • Virginia Beach, VA down about 19% over the 12 months ending July 2026 · sustained: down about 17% a year · 2021-2026
Real-Time Crime Index through 2026-06 administrative trend: robust fit about this metric
See all Public Safety data →
Economy 7 indicators
Economy

Median household income

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Household income rose about 35% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from $48,711 to $65,742 (each survey's own dollars, not adjusted for inflation) - more than the combined survey margin (±$1,734).

Broader trend
All similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. Pittsburgh started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
Longer view
Household income rose about 64% from 2014 to 2024 ($40,009 to $65,742).
Bright spot $65,742
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Pennsylvania ref $77,971 +26%
United States ref $80,734 +28%
Newark, NJ $52,060 29th +48% 1st 33% below peers
Stockton, CA $79,907 14th +46% 2nd 2% above peers
Santa Ana, CA $93,999 9th +42% 3rd 20% above peers
Orlando, FL $72,336 18th +40% 4th 7% below peers
Durham, NC $81,619 12th +39% 5th 5% above peers
Jersey City, NJ $97,710 7th +38% 6th 25% above peers
Reno, NV $80,760 13th +37% 7th 3% above peers
Pittsburgh, PA $65,742 22nd +35% 8th 16% below peers
Laredo, TX $63,915 23rd +34% 9th 18% below peers
Buffalo, NY $50,041 30th +34% 10th 36% below peers
North Las Vegas, NV $79,542 15th +33% 11th 2% above peers
Chula Vista, CA $108,032 5th +33% 12th 38% above peers
Anaheim, CA $95,227 8th +33% 13th 22% above peers
Riverside, CA $91,045 10th +32% 14th 17% above peers
Chandler, AZ $108,095 4th +30% 15th 38% above peers
Cincinnati, OH $52,909 28th +30% 16th 32% below peers
Irvine, CA $136,719 1st +30% 17th 75% above peers
St. Louis, MO $56,160 27th +28% 18th 28% below peers
Saint Paul, MN $73,394 17th +27% 19th 6% below peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR $28,562 31st +27% 20th 63% below peers
Gilbert, AZ $122,551 2nd +27% 21st 57% above peers
Greensboro, NC $61,515 24th +26% 22nd 21% below peers
Lincoln, NE $71,867 19th +24% 23rd 8% below peers
Fort Wayne, IN $61,422 25th +24% 24th 21% below peers
Anchorage municipality, AK $103,284 6th +22% 25th 32% above peers
Lexington, KY $69,479 20th +21% 26th 11% below peers
Urban Honolulu, HI $86,504 11th +21% 27th 11% above peers
Lubbock, TX $60,895 26th +21% 28th 22% below peers
Corpus Christi, TX $67,394 21st +20% 29th 14% below peers
Madison, WI $78,050 16th +19% 30th on par with peers
Plano, TX $112,253 3rd +17% 31st 44% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 128 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyMedian household income
Loading tract map…
18 of 128 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 13 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Miami, FL up about 60% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Newark, NJ up about 48% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Fresno, CA up about 41% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 92% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±$1,484 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
★
Economy

Unemployment rate

▼ Lower is better Improving recently, trailing peers ★ Strong performer
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Unemployment fell 0.1 percentage points over the 12 months ending July 2026, slower than 68% of similar-size cities.

Broader trend
Multi-year view: unemployment fell less than 0.1 percentage points a year from 2022 to 2025, faster than 100% of similar-size cities. The change does not yet pass the noise and consistency checks, so treat it as a raw signal.
Longer view
Unemployment fell about 0.2 percentage points a year from 2015 to 2025.
Latest
Most recent monthly reading: 3.7% in July 2026, down from 3.8% a year earlier.
Needs attention 3.7%
1990July 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 29 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Pennsylvania ref 3.9% (Jul 26) -0.5pp
United States ref 4.1% (Aug 26) -0.2pp
Newark, NJ 6.9% (Jul 26) 28th -2.0pp 1st 60% above peers
Cincinnati, OH 3.9% (Jul 26) 7th -1.6pp 2nd 9% below peers
Jersey City, NJ 4.2% (Jul 26) 10th -1.1pp 3rd 2% below peers
St. Louis, MO 4.4% (Jul 26) 16th -0.7pp 4th 2% above peers
Fort Wayne, IN 3.4% (Jul 26) 4th -0.6pp 5th 21% below peers
Greensboro, NC 4.4% (Jul 26) 17th -0.6pp 6th 2% above peers
Santa Ana, CA 4.2% (Jul 26) 11th -0.5pp 7th 2% below peers
North Las Vegas, NV 5.6% (Jul 26) 26th -0.5pp 8th 30% above peers
Riverside, CA 5.1% (Jul 26) 24th -0.5pp 9th 19% above peers
Stockton, CA 7.1% (Jul 26) 29th -0.5pp 10th 65% above peers
Reno, NV 3.9% (Jul 26) 8th -0.4pp 11th 9% below peers
Chula Vista, CA 5.1% (Jul 26) 25th -0.3pp 12th 19% above peers
Durham, NC 3.4% (Jul 26) 5th -0.3pp 13th 21% below peers
Lincoln, NE 2.6% (Jul 26) 1st -0.3pp 14th 40% below peers
Irvine, CA 4.3% (Jul 26) 12th -0.3pp 15th on par with peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 3.2% (Jul 26) 3rd -0.3pp 16th 26% below peers
Anaheim, CA 4.4% (Jul 26) 18th -0.2pp 17th 2% above peers
Lexington, KY 4.3% (Jul 26) 13th -0.1pp 18th on par with peers
Laredo, TX 4.8% (Jul 26) 22nd -0.1pp 19th 12% above peers
Pittsburgh, PA 3.7% (Jul 26) 6th -0.1pp 20th 14% below peers
Madison, WI 2.9% (Jul 26) 2nd +0.2pp 21st 33% below peers
Buffalo, NY 5.7% (Jul 26) 27th +0.2pp 22nd 33% above peers
Corpus Christi, TX 4.8% (Jul 26) 23rd +0.4pp 23rd 12% above peers
Lubbock, TX 4.4% (Jul 26) 19th +0.4pp 24th 2% above peers
Gilbert, AZ 4.1% (Jul 26) 9th +0.5pp 25th 5% below peers
Plano, TX 4.5% (Jul 26) 20th +0.5pp 26th 5% above peers
Chandler, AZ 4.3% (Jul 26) 14th +0.5pp 27th on par with peers
Orlando, FL 4.3% (Jul 26) 15th +0.6pp 28th on par with peers
Saint Paul, MN 4.6% (Jul 26) 21st +0.7pp 29th 7% above peers
BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics through 2025 administrative trend: robust fit about this metric
Economy

Share of people below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Poverty changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (20.5% then, 20.1% now; margin ±1.1pp).

Broader trend
57% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Poverty fell 2.7 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (22.8% to 20.1%).
Needs attention 20.1%
20112024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Pennsylvania ref 11.7% -0.7pp
United States ref 12.4%
Santa Ana, CA 10.8% 6th -4.9pp 1st 28% below peers
Durham, NC 11.7% 8th -4.2pp 2nd 22% below peers
Laredo, TX 20.9% 27th -5.8pp 3rd 40% above peers
Irvine, CA 10.8% 7th -2.5pp 4th 27% below peers
Saint Paul, MN 15.6% 18th -3.3pp 5th 5% above peers
Anaheim, CA 12.4% 12th -2.4pp 6th 17% below peers
Orlando, FL 14.7% 15th -2.6pp 7th 2% below peers
Newark, NJ 23.4% 28th -4.0pp 8th 57% above peers
Buffalo, NY 26.0% 30th -4.1pp 9th 74% above peers
Stockton, CA 15.5% 17th -2.4pp 10th 4% above peers
Riverside, CA 12.2% 11th -1.7pp 11th 18% below peers
North Las Vegas, NV 12.1% 10th -1.7pp 12th 19% below peers
Lexington, KY 14.9% 16th -1.9pp 13th on par with peers
Chula Vista, CA 8.8% 4th -0.9pp 14th 41% below peers
Jersey City, NJ 15.6% 19th -1.5pp 15th 5% above peers
Greensboro, NC 17.0% 22nd -1.5pp 16th 14% above peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 38.2% 31st -2.9pp 17th 156% above peers
Reno, NV 12.7% 13th -0.8pp 18th 15% below peers
Lubbock, TX 18.9% 24th -1.2pp 19th 27% above peers
Lincoln, NE 12.7% 14th -0.8pp 20th 15% below peers
St. Louis, MO 20.6% 26th -1.2pp 21st 38% above peers
Cincinnati, OH 25.5% 29th -0.8pp 22nd 71% above peers
Madison, WI 16.4% 21st -0.5pp 23rd 10% above peers
Pittsburgh, PA 20.1% 25th -0.4pp 24th 34% above peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 8.9% 5th -0.1pp 25th 40% below peers
Gilbert, AZ 5.3% 1st -0.0pp 26th 65% below peers
Plano, TX 6.8% 2nd -0.0pp 27th 55% below peers
Fort Wayne, IN 16.0% 20th +0.1pp 28th 7% above peers
Chandler, AZ 7.9% 3rd +0.3pp 29th 47% below peers
Corpus Christi, TX 17.1% 23rd +1.0pp 30th 15% above peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 11.9% 9th +1.3pp 31st 20% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 128 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of people below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
17 of 128 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 10 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Laredo, TX down 5.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 95% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Fresno, CA down 5.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 94% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Atlanta, GA down 3.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 90% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.8pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Share of children below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Child poverty rose 3.7 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 27.2% to 30.8% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.7pp). That reverses the previous span, which went down between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Broader trend
3% of similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction; 50% moved the other way.
Longer view
Child poverty fell 1.1 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (31.9% to 30.8%).
Needs attention 30.8%
20132024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Pennsylvania ref 15.6% -2.0pp
United States ref 16.1%
Santa Ana, CA 14.6% 9th -8.8pp 1st 18% below peers
Durham, NC 16.6% 15th -7.9pp 2nd 7% below peers
Anaheim, CA 15.3% 13th -6.9pp 3rd 14% below peers
North Las Vegas, NV 15.4% 14th -5.2pp 4th 13% below peers
Laredo, TX 28.3% 25th -8.5pp 5th 59% above peers
Buffalo, NY 35.5% 29th -10.4pp 6th 99% above peers
Saint Paul, MN 22.0% 20th -5.6pp 7th 23% above peers
Riverside, CA 14.8% 10th -3.2pp 8th 17% below peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 10.8% 6th -2.3pp 9th 40% below peers
Newark, NJ 31.2% 28th -6.6pp 10th 75% above peers
Orlando, FL 20.6% 18th -3.8pp 11th 16% above peers
Stockton, CA 20.8% 19th -3.3pp 12th 17% above peers
Lexington, KY 17.9% 16th -2.6pp 13th on par with peers
St. Louis, MO 29.7% 26th -4.2pp 14th 66% above peers
Greensboro, NC 23.5% 22nd -3.2pp 15th 31% above peers
Chula Vista, CA 10.0% 5th -1.2pp 16th 44% below peers
Lubbock, TX 20.1% 17th -1.9pp 17th 12% above peers
Gilbert, AZ 5.0% 1st -0.4pp 18th 72% below peers
Jersey City, NJ 22.9% 21st -1.9pp 19th 28% above peers
Cincinnati, OH 36.2% 30th -2.7pp 20th 103% above peers
Plano, TX 7.9% 2nd -0.5pp 21st 56% below peers
Reno, NV 14.9% 12th -0.8pp 22nd 16% below peers
Lincoln, NE 13.6% 7th -0.6pp 23rd 24% below peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 58.6% 31st -1.9pp 24th 228% above peers
Fort Wayne, IN 23.8% 23rd -0.3pp 25th 33% above peers
Chandler, AZ 9.9% 4th +0.4pp 26th 44% below peers
Corpus Christi, TX 25.0% 24th +2.0pp 27th 40% above peers
Irvine, CA 8.6% 3rd +0.7pp 28th 52% below peers
Pittsburgh, PA 30.8% 27th +3.7pp 29th 73% above peers
Madison, WI 13.9% 8th +2.1pp 30th 22% below peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 14.9% 11th +2.8pp 31st 17% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 128 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of children below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
17 of 128 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 16 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Atlanta, GA down 10.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 92% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Glendale, AZ down 6.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 89% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Boston, MA down 6.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 86% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±2.2pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Households with a broadband internet subscription

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Broadband rose 8.8 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 81.8% to 90.6% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.7pp).

Broader trend
97% of similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. Pittsburgh started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
Longer view
Broadband rose 13.6 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (77.0% to 90.6%).
Bright spot 90.6%
20172024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Pennsylvania ref 90.0% +7.9pp
United States ref 91.1%
San Juan zona urbana, PR 75.7% 31st +18.9pp 1st 18% below peers
Laredo, TX 87.5% 28th +18.9pp 2nd 5% below peers
Greensboro, NC 91.0% 19th +17.9pp 3rd 1% below peers
Newark, NJ 86.5% 30th +16.7pp 4th 6% below peers
Buffalo, NY 88.6% 27th +13.7pp 5th 3% below peers
St. Louis, MO 86.9% 29th +12.5pp 6th 5% below peers
Stockton, CA 91.8% 16th +12.5pp 7th on par with peers
Cincinnati, OH 89.3% 25th +9.6pp 8th 3% below peers
Lubbock, TX 88.9% 26th +8.8pp 9th 3% below peers
Pittsburgh, PA 90.6% 21st +8.8pp 10th 1% below peers
North Las Vegas, NV 93.2% 9th +8.6pp 11th 2% above peers
Santa Ana, CA 92.2% 15th +7.9pp 12th on par with peers
Corpus Christi, TX 89.6% 23rd +7.0pp 13th 2% below peers
Fort Wayne, IN 90.8% 20th +6.9pp 14th 1% below peers
Jersey City, NJ 92.6% 13th +6.8pp 15th 1% above peers
Durham, NC 93.7% 8th +6.7pp 16th 2% above peers
Riverside, CA 94.4% 7th +6.5pp 17th 3% above peers
Orlando, FL 93.2% 10th +6.3pp 18th 2% above peers
Saint Paul, MN 91.8% 17th +6.2pp 19th on par with peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 89.3% 24th +5.9pp 20th 3% below peers
Reno, NV 89.7% 22nd +5.8pp 21st 2% below peers
Chula Vista, CA 94.8% 5th +6.1pp 22nd 3% above peers
Lexington, KY 92.6% 14th +5.7pp 23rd 1% above peers
Lincoln, NE 92.9% 12th +5.1pp 24th 1% above peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 94.6% 6th +4.5pp 25th 3% above peers
Anaheim, CA 93.1% 11th +3.7pp 26th 1% above peers
Chandler, AZ 95.4% 4th +3.5pp 27th 4% above peers
Madison, WI 91.5% 18th +2.8pp 28th on par with peers
Plano, TX 96.7% 2nd +2.6pp 29th 5% above peers
Irvine, CA 95.8% 3rd +1.9pp 30th 4% above peers
Gilbert, AZ 97.0% 1st +1.1pp 31st 6% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 128 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds with a broadband internet subscription
Loading tract map…
17 of 128 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 11 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • San Juan zona urbana, PR up 18.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Detroit, MI up 21.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Laredo, TX up 18.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.4pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Income inequality (Gini index)

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Inequality changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (0.52 then, 0.52 now; margin ±0.01).

Broader trend
17% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Inequality held roughly steady from 2014 to 2024.
Needs attention 0.52
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Pennsylvania ref 0.47 +0.002
United States ref 0.48 +0.001
Stockton, CA 0.44 8th -0.031 1st 5% below peers
Laredo, TX 0.45 13th -0.025 2nd 2% below peers
Irvine, CA 0.46 14th -0.011 3rd on par with peers
Jersey City, NJ 0.51 28th -0.010 4th 10% above peers
Orlando, FL 0.49 22nd -0.008 5th 6% above peers
Riverside, CA 0.42 4th -0.007 6th 9% below peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 0.61 31st -0.009 7th 32% above peers
Newark, NJ 0.50 25th -0.007 8th 7% above peers
Buffalo, NY 0.50 26th -0.007 9th 9% above peers
Greensboro, NC 0.49 23rd -0.005 10th 6% above peers
Durham, NC 0.46 15th -0.003 11th on par with peers
Santa Ana, CA 0.40 3rd -0.001 12th 13% below peers
St. Louis, MO 0.50 27th -0.001 13th 9% above peers
Plano, TX 0.45 10th -0.001 14th 4% below peers
Chandler, AZ 0.42 5th -0.001 15th 9% below peers
Lexington, KY 0.49 24th -0.001 16th 6% above peers
Saint Paul, MN 0.48 19th -0.000 17th 4% above peers
Fort Wayne, IN 0.44 9th +0.001 18th 4% below peers
Pittsburgh, PA 0.52 29th +0.001 19th 13% above peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 0.43 7th +0.001 20th 7% below peers
Cincinnati, OH 0.54 30th +0.003 21st 17% above peers
Chula Vista, CA 0.42 6th +0.003 22nd 8% below peers
Corpus Christi, TX 0.46 16th +0.003 23rd on par with peers
Lincoln, NE 0.45 12th +0.003 24th 3% below peers
Lubbock, TX 0.49 21st +0.006 25th 6% above peers
Madison, WI 0.47 17th +0.007 26th 1% above peers
North Las Vegas, NV 0.40 2nd +0.008 27th 13% below peers
Reno, NV 0.48 18th +0.011 28th 3% above peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 0.48 20th +0.011 29th 5% above peers
Gilbert, AZ 0.39 1st +0.013 30th 15% below peers
Anaheim, CA 0.45 11th +0.015 31st 4% below peers
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B19083) through 2024 ±0.01 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Households receiving SNAP

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

SNAP changed less than the survey can measure between the 2014-2018 and 2019-2023 surveys (17.3% then, 16.5% now; margin ±1.1pp).

Broader trend
67% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Snap fell 0.6 percentage points from 2013 to 2023 (17.1% to 16.5%).
Needs attention 16.5%
20102023
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2019-2023 survey Today's rank Change2014-2018 → 2019-2023 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Pennsylvania ref 14.0% +0.8pp
United States ref 11.8% -0.5pp
Santa Ana, CA 11.3% 13th -4.7pp 1st 8% below peers
Durham, NC 9.3% 9th -2.7pp 2nd 24% below peers
Fort Wayne, IN 11.4% 15th -2.9pp 3rd 7% below peers
Lexington, KY 8.5% 5th -1.9pp 4th 30% below peers
Jersey City, NJ 14.0% 18th -2.9pp 5th 14% above peers
Saint Paul, MN 15.0% 20th -2.9pp 6th 23% above peers
Gilbert, AZ 3.4% 1st -0.6pp 7th 72% below peers
St. Louis, MO 18.0% 25th -3.3pp 8th 47% above peers
Orlando, FL 15.0% 19th -2.3pp 9th 23% above peers
Cincinnati, OH 18.3% 26th -2.6pp 10th 50% above peers
Newark, NJ 23.7% 28th -3.3pp 11th 93% above peers
Laredo, TX 23.9% 29th -3.3pp 12th 95% above peers
Buffalo, NY 29.9% 30th -3.9pp 13th 145% above peers
Lubbock, TX 11.4% 14th -1.3pp 14th 7% below peers
North Las Vegas, NV 15.1% 21st -1.2pp 15th 23% above peers
Pittsburgh, PA 16.5% 22nd -0.7pp 16th 35% above peers
Chandler, AZ 5.3% 4th -0.2pp 17th 57% below peers
Lincoln, NE 8.9% 7th -0.0pp 18th 27% below peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 8.8% 6th +0.1pp 19th 28% below peers
Corpus Christi, TX 16.8% 23rd +0.3pp 20th 37% above peers
Stockton, CA 20.8% 27th +0.8pp 21st 70% above peers
Riverside, CA 11.1% 12th +0.5pp 22nd 9% below peers
Reno, NV 12.2% 16th +0.8pp 23rd on par with peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 10.8% 11th +1.0pp 24th 12% below peers
Greensboro, NC 17.4% 24th +1.8pp 25th 42% above peers
Madison, WI 9.2% 8th +1.0pp 26th 24% below peers
Plano, TX 3.4% 2nd +0.5pp 27th 72% below peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 34.6% 31st +5.9pp 28th 183% above peers
Chula Vista, CA 10.6% 10th +2.0pp 29th 14% below peers
Anaheim, CA 14.0% 17th +2.7pp 30th 14% above peers
Irvine, CA 4.9% 3rd +2.3pp 31st 60% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 128 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2018 to 2023, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds receiving SNAP
Loading tract map…
16 of 128 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 11 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Tampa, FL down 3.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 91% of this group · 2018-2023
  • Miami, FL down 5.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 89% of this group · 2018-2023
  • Jersey City, NJ down 2.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 85% of this group · 2018-2023
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2023 ±0.9pp at 90% confidence (2023 estimate) survey trend: 2014-2018 vs 2019-2023 surveys about this metric
See all Economy data →
Housing 6 indicators
Housing

Typical home value

No better direction Falling recently, faster than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Home value fell about 1% over the 12 months ending August 2026, faster than 70% of similar-size cities.

Broader trend
Multi-year view: home value rose about 2% a year from 2021 to 2026, slower than 63% of similar-size cities.
Longer view
Home value rose about 8% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Latest
Most recent monthly reading: $239,865 in August 2026, down from $242,203 a year earlier.
Big move $239,865
2000August 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 28 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Pennsylvania ref $290,401 (Aug 26) +2.4%
United States ref $368,697 (Aug 26) +1.2%
Anchorage municipality, AK $422,785 (Aug 26) 15th +5.3% 1st 1% below peers
Santa Ana, CA $868,002 (Aug 26) 3rd +3.3% 2nd 104% above peers
Fort Wayne, IN $248,442 (Aug 26) 23rd +3.1% 3rd 42% below peers
Lincoln, NE $293,764 (Aug 26) 19th +3.0% 4th 31% below peers
Buffalo, NY $248,828 (Aug 26) 22nd +2.9% 5th 42% below peers
Anaheim, CA $946,371 (Aug 26) 2nd +2.7% 6th 122% above peers
Madison, WI $426,336 (Aug 26) 14th +2.5% 7th on par with peers
Urban Honolulu, HI $856,332 (Aug 26) 4th +2.3% 8th 101% above peers
Laredo, TX $222,782 (Aug 26) 26th +2.2% 9th 48% below peers
Lubbock, TX $212,039 (Aug 26) 27th +2.1% 10th 50% below peers
Reno, NV $573,360 (Aug 26) 8th +1.4% 11th 34% above peers
Chula Vista, CA $849,526 (Aug 26) 5th +0.8% 12th 99% above peers
Cincinnati, OH $249,297 (Aug 26) 21st +0.5% 13th 42% below peers
Riverside, CA $645,110 (Aug 26) 7th +0.5% 14th 51% above peers
Corpus Christi, TX $223,078 (Aug 26) 25th +0.3% 15th 48% below peers
Greensboro, NC $263,264 (Aug 26) 20th +0.0% 16th 38% below peers
Jersey City, NJ $657,765 (Aug 26) 6th -0.2% 17th 54% above peers
St. Louis, MO $181,925 (Aug 26) 28th -0.3% 18th 57% below peers
Gilbert, AZ $566,873 (Aug 26) 9th -0.3% 19th 33% above peers
Pittsburgh, PA $239,865 (Aug 26) 24th -1.0% 20th 44% below peers
Newark, NJ $481,850 (Aug 26) 12th -1.3% 21st 13% above peers
Chandler, AZ $515,351 (Aug 26) 10th -1.3% 22nd 21% above peers
Orlando, FL $371,120 (Aug 26) 18th -1.4% 23rd 13% below peers
North Las Vegas, NV $402,439 (Aug 26) 16th -1.5% 24th 6% below peers
Irvine, CA $1,492,449 (Aug 26) 1st -1.8% 25th 250% above peers
Stockton, CA $427,285 (Aug 26) 13th -2.3% 26th on par with peers
Durham, NC $389,634 (Aug 26) 17th -3.4% 27th 9% below peers
Plano, TX $493,092 (Aug 26) 11th -3.8% 28th 16% above peers
Zillow Home Value Index through 2026-08 modeled trend: robust fit about this metric
Housing

Starter home value (bottom tier)

No better direction Falling recently, faster than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Starter homes fell about 1% over the 12 months ending August 2026, faster than 70% of similar-size cities.

Broader trend
Multi-year view: starter homes rose about 2% a year from 2021 to 2026, slower than 67% of similar-size cities.
Longer view
Starter homes rose about 11% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Latest
Most recent monthly reading: $140,307 in August 2026, down from $141,954 a year earlier.
Big move $140,307
2000August 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 28 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Pennsylvania ref $158,769 (Aug 26) +2.6%
United States ref $200,550 (Aug 26) +2.2%
Anchorage municipality, AK $288,422 (Aug 26) 16th +8.1% 1st 14% below peers
Laredo, TX $152,796 (Aug 26) 24th +5.4% 2nd 54% below peers
Buffalo, NY $168,997 (Aug 26) 21st +4.1% 3rd 49% below peers
Lincoln, NE $216,087 (Aug 26) 19th +3.4% 4th 35% below peers
Santa Ana, CA $602,608 (Aug 26) 4th +2.8% 5th 81% above peers
Fort Wayne, IN $160,142 (Aug 26) 23rd +2.7% 6th 52% below peers
Corpus Christi, TX $128,731 (Aug 26) 27th +2.4% 7th 61% below peers
Lubbock, TX $130,770 (Aug 26) 26th +2.1% 8th 61% below peers
Anaheim, CA $759,338 (Aug 26) 2nd +2.1% 9th 127% above peers
Cincinnati, OH $165,811 (Aug 26) 22nd +1.8% 10th 50% below peers
Jersey City, NJ $447,287 (Aug 26) 8th +1.4% 11th 34% above peers
Newark, NJ $384,631 (Aug 26) 11th +1.2% 12th 15% above peers
Madison, WI $312,158 (Aug 26) 15th +1.2% 13th 6% below peers
Riverside, CA $541,510 (Aug 26) 5th +1.0% 14th 62% above peers
Reno, NV $397,257 (Aug 26) 10th +0.8% 15th 19% above peers
Chula Vista, CA $658,593 (Aug 26) 3rd +0.1% 16th 97% above peers
Greensboro, NC $171,051 (Aug 26) 20th -0.2% 17th 49% below peers
Urban Honolulu, HI $461,495 (Aug 26) 6th -0.3% 18th 38% above peers
Gilbert, AZ $449,884 (Aug 26) 7th -1.0% 19th 35% above peers
Pittsburgh, PA $140,307 (Aug 26) 25th -1.2% 20th 58% below peers
Irvine, CA $1,017,448 (Aug 26) 1st -1.3% 21st 205% above peers
North Las Vegas, NV $333,778 (Aug 26) 14th -1.4% 22nd on par with peers
Stockton, CA $336,675 (Aug 26) 13th -1.6% 23rd 1% above peers
Chandler, AZ $397,527 (Aug 26) 9th -2.3% 24th 19% above peers
Orlando, FL $236,142 (Aug 26) 18th -2.9% 25th 29% below peers
Durham, NC $282,309 (Aug 26) 17th -3.0% 26th 15% below peers
St. Louis, MO $75,581 (Aug 26) 28th -3.3% 27th 77% below peers
Plano, TX $362,238 (Aug 26) 12th -3.9% 28th 9% above peers
Zillow Home Value Index through 2026-08 modeled trend: robust fit about this metric
Housing

Homeownership rate

▲ Higher is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Homeownership changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (47.2% then, 47.7% now; margin ±1.1pp).

Broader trend
53% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Homeownership fell 1.1 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (48.8% to 47.7%).
Needs attention 47.7%
20112024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Pennsylvania ref 69.3% +0.4pp
United States ref 65.2%
Orlando, FL 39.5% 29th +4.1pp 1st 24% below peers
Stockton, CA 53.9% 12th +5.2pp 2nd 3% above peers
Newark, NJ 24.4% 31st +2.1pp 3rd 53% below peers
North Las Vegas, NV 63.6% 5th +5.5pp 4th 22% above peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 48.9% 20th +4.2pp 5th 6% below peers
Buffalo, NY 43.0% 27th +2.3pp 6th 18% below peers
Cincinnati, OH 39.8% 28th +2.1pp 7th 24% below peers
Riverside, CA 56.8% 10th +2.8pp 8th 9% above peers
Saint Paul, MN 52.9% 14th +2.5pp 9th 1% above peers
Durham, NC 52.3% 16th +2.1pp 10th on par with peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 63.9% 4th +2.6pp 11th 22% above peers
Reno, NV 49.8% 19th +1.9pp 12th 5% below peers
St. Louis, MO 45.3% 24th +1.6pp 13th 13% below peers
Laredo, TX 64.1% 3rd +2.2pp 14th 22% above peers
Anaheim, CA 46.2% 22nd +1.4pp 15th 12% below peers
Corpus Christi, TX 57.9% 8th +1.2pp 16th 11% above peers
Chula Vista, CA 59.8% 7th +0.7pp 17th 14% above peers
Pittsburgh, PA 47.7% 21st +0.5pp 18th 9% below peers
Greensboro, NC 50.5% 18th +0.2pp 19th 3% below peers
Chandler, AZ 65.0% 2nd +0.1pp 20th 24% above peers
Lubbock, TX 51.2% 17th -0.1pp 21st 2% below peers
Fort Wayne, IN 61.9% 6th -0.1pp 22nd 18% above peers
Gilbert, AZ 73.1% 1st -0.7pp 23rd 40% above peers
Lexington, KY 53.8% 13th -0.7pp 24th 3% above peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 52.5% 15th -0.8pp 25th on par with peers
Lincoln, NE 56.1% 11th -0.9pp 26th 7% above peers
Madison, WI 46.0% 23rd -1.0pp 27th 12% below peers
Santa Ana, CA 44.6% 25th -1.5pp 28th 15% below peers
Plano, TX 56.9% 9th -2.2pp 29th 9% above peers
Jersey City, NJ 27.9% 30th -1.2pp 30th 47% below peers
Irvine, CA 44.5% 26th -2.4pp 31st 15% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 128 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHomeownership rate
Loading tract map…
17 of 128 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 11 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.8pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Housing

Typical asking rent

No better direction Rising recently, faster than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Rent rose about 4% over the 12 months ending August 2026, faster than 85% of similar-size cities.

Broader trend
Multi-year view: rent rose about 4% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 56% of similar-size cities.
Longer view
Rent rose about 5% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Latest
Most recent monthly reading: $1,545 in August 2026, up from $1,492 a year earlier.
Big move $1,545
2015August 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 28 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
United States ref $1,948 (Aug 26) +2.5%
Reno, NV $1,967 (Aug 26) 11th +7.1% 1st 5% above peers
Fort Wayne, IN $1,271 (Aug 26) 27th +5.9% 2nd 32% below peers
Urban Honolulu, HI $3,020 (Aug 26) 3rd +4.6% 3rd 62% above peers
Anchorage municipality, AK $1,802 (Aug 26) 15th +4.2% 4th 4% below peers
Pittsburgh, PA $1,545 (Aug 26) 19th +3.6% 5th 17% below peers
St. Louis, MO $1,330 (Aug 26) 25th +3.5% 6th 29% below peers
Jersey City, NJ $3,157 (Aug 26) 2nd +3.0% 7th 69% above peers
Buffalo, NY $1,425 (Aug 26) 20th +2.9% 8th 24% below peers
Cincinnati, OH $1,414 (Aug 26) 22nd +2.7% 9th 24% below peers
Anaheim, CA $2,759 (Aug 26) 6th +2.3% 10th 48% above peers
Greensboro, NC $1,392 (Aug 26) 23rd +2.1% 11th 25% below peers
Riverside, CA $2,444 (Aug 26) 7th +2.1% 12th 31% above peers
Lincoln, NE $1,308 (Aug 26) 26th +2.0% 13th 30% below peers
Corpus Christi, TX $1,424 (Aug 26) 21st +1.9% 14th 24% below peers
Durham, NC $1,659 (Aug 26) 17th +1.8% 15th 11% below peers
Madison, WI $1,616 (Aug 26) 18th +1.8% 16th 13% below peers
Santa Ana, CA $2,812 (Aug 26) 5th +1.7% 17th 51% above peers
Chula Vista, CA $2,945 (Aug 26) 4th +1.5% 18th 58% above peers
Laredo, TX $1,190 (Aug 26) 28th +1.5% 19th 36% below peers
Lubbock, TX $1,333 (Aug 26) 24th +1.5% 20th 29% below peers
Chandler, AZ $1,868 (Aug 26) 14th +1.4% 21st on par with peers
Irvine, CA $3,527 (Aug 26) 1st +1.1% 22nd 89% above peers
Gilbert, AZ $2,075 (Aug 26) 9th +0.8% 23rd 11% above peers
Stockton, CA $2,010 (Aug 26) 10th +0.7% 24th 8% above peers
Orlando, FL $1,896 (Aug 26) 12th +0.6% 25th 2% above peers
Newark, NJ $2,114 (Aug 26) 8th +0.5% 26th 13% above peers
Plano, TX $1,742 (Aug 26) 16th +0.3% 27th 7% below peers
North Las Vegas, NV $1,889 (Aug 26) 13th -0.0% 28th 1% above peers
Zillow Observed Rent Index through 2026-08 modeled trend: robust fit about this metric
Housing

Housing cost-burdened households

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Cost burden changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (33.3% then, 33.6% now; margin ±1.4pp).

Broader trend
40% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Cost burden fell 2.2 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (35.9% to 33.6%).
Bright spot 33.6%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Pennsylvania ref 28.1% -0.8pp
United States ref 32.2% +0.4pp
Santa Ana, CA 42.6% 26th -4.5pp 1st 15% above peers
St. Louis, MO 34.2% 10th -3.2pp 2nd 7% below peers
Newark, NJ 53.8% 31st -4.6pp 3rd 46% above peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 36.6% 15th -2.9pp 4th 1% below peers
Stockton, CA 41.0% 22nd -2.2pp 5th 11% above peers
Durham, NC 31.9% 7th -1.6pp 6th 13% below peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 31.1% 6th -0.7pp 7th 16% below peers
Buffalo, NY 37.7% 18th -0.8pp 8th 2% above peers
Jersey City, NJ 41.7% 23rd -0.8pp 9th 13% above peers
Laredo, TX 36.1% 13th -0.6pp 10th 2% below peers
Irvine, CA 42.5% 24th -0.4pp 11th 15% above peers
Anaheim, CA 47.3% 30th -0.3pp 12th 28% above peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 43.6% 27th +0.4pp 13th 18% above peers
Cincinnati, OH 38.9% 20th +0.4pp 14th 6% above peers
Pittsburgh, PA 33.6% 9th +0.4pp 15th 9% below peers
Chula Vista, CA 44.9% 28th +1.0pp 16th 22% above peers
Chandler, AZ 27.1% 2nd +0.7pp 17th 26% below peers
Gilbert, AZ 25.3% 1st +0.6pp 18th 31% below peers
Riverside, CA 42.5% 25th +1.5pp 19th 15% above peers
Madison, WI 36.4% 14th +1.4pp 20th 1% below peers
Saint Paul, MN 35.7% 12th +1.5pp 21st 3% below peers
Orlando, FL 46.0% 29th +2.0pp 22nd 25% above peers
Lexington, KY 32.1% 8th +1.6pp 23rd 13% below peers
Reno, NV 36.9% 17th +1.8pp 24th on par with peers
Greensboro, NC 36.9% 16th +2.0pp 25th on par with peers
Lincoln, NE 30.3% 4th +1.9pp 26th 18% below peers
Lubbock, TX 38.6% 19th +2.5pp 27th 5% above peers
North Las Vegas, NV 39.0% 21st +2.6pp 28th 6% above peers
Corpus Christi, TX 35.1% 11th +2.6pp 29th 5% below peers
Fort Wayne, IN 27.6% 3rd +2.2pp 30th 25% below peers
Plano, TX 30.5% 5th +3.4pp 31st 17% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 128 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHousing cost-burdened households
Loading tract map…
17 of 128 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 11 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (tables B25070 + B25091) through 2024 ±1.1pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Housing

Households without a vehicle

▼ Lower is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

No vehicle fell 2.7 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 23.3% to 20.6% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.1pp).

Broader trend
23% of similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction; 10% moved the other way. Pittsburgh started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
Longer view
No vehicle fell 4.1 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (24.7% to 20.6%).
Bright spot 20.6%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Pennsylvania ref 10.4% -0.5pp
United States ref 8.3% -0.3pp
Stockton, CA 7.2% 15th -2.0pp 1st on par with peers
Riverside, CA 4.5% 4th -1.2pp 2nd 37% below peers
Buffalo, NY 22.6% 29th -5.3pp 3rd 214% above peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 20.4% 27th -4.8pp 4th 184% above peers
Durham, NC 7.2% 17th -1.4pp 5th on par with peers
Cincinnati, OH 17.1% 25th -2.8pp 6th 137% above peers
Pittsburgh, PA 20.6% 28th -2.7pp 7th 186% above peers
Chandler, AZ 3.3% 2nd -0.4pp 8th 54% below peers
Newark, NJ 34.3% 30th -4.1pp 9th 376% above peers
Lexington, KY 7.2% 16th -0.7pp 10th on par with peers
Reno, NV 8.4% 21st -0.7pp 11th 16% above peers
Orlando, FL 7.4% 18th -0.6pp 12th 3% above peers
Corpus Christi, TX 7.0% 14th -0.5pp 13th 3% below peers
St. Louis, MO 18.5% 26th -1.2pp 14th 157% above peers
North Las Vegas, NV 5.2% 6th -0.2pp 15th 28% below peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 5.8% 9th -0.2pp 16th 19% below peers
Chula Vista, CA 4.5% 5th -0.1pp 17th 37% below peers
Saint Paul, MN 13.0% 23rd -0.3pp 18th 81% above peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 16.6% 24th +0.0pp 19th 131% above peers
Anaheim, CA 5.6% 8th +0.2pp 20th 23% below peers
Lubbock, TX 6.1% 11th +0.2pp 21st 15% below peers
Jersey City, NJ 40.3% 31st +1.8pp 22nd 459% above peers
Madison, WI 12.2% 22nd +0.8pp 23rd 69% above peers
Greensboro, NC 8.2% 20th +0.6pp 24th 13% above peers
Santa Ana, CA 6.0% 10th +0.5pp 25th 16% below peers
Irvine, CA 5.3% 7th +0.5pp 26th 27% below peers
Laredo, TX 6.6% 12th +0.7pp 27th 8% below peers
Lincoln, NE 6.7% 13th +0.8pp 28th 7% below peers
Plano, TX 3.7% 3rd +0.5pp 29th 48% below peers
Fort Wayne, IN 7.8% 19th +1.2pp 30th 8% above peers
Gilbert, AZ 2.3% 1st +0.6pp 31st 68% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 128 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHouseholds without a vehicle
Loading tract map…
17 of 128 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 11 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Buffalo, NY down 5.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 94% of this group · 2019-2024
  • San Juan zona urbana, PR down 4.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 92% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Detroit, MI down 3.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 88% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B08201) through 2024 ±0.8pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Housing data →
Health 3 indicators
★
Health

People without health insurance

▼ Lower is better Turning down (early signal) ★ Strong performer
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (5.3% then, 4.8% now; margin ±0.5pp). The newest releases lean downward: each of the last 3 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*

Broader trend
53% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Uninsured fell 4.8 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (9.6% to 4.8%).
Bright spot 4.8%
20132024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Pennsylvania ref 5.6% -0.0pp
United States ref 8.4% -0.4pp
Jersey City, NJ 8.5% 16th -2.9pp 1st on par with peers
Santa Ana, CA 12.2% 25th -3.5pp 2nd 43% above peers
Greensboro, NC 8.4% 14th -1.9pp 3rd 2% below peers
Anaheim, CA 9.9% 21st -2.1pp 4th 17% above peers
Lincoln, NE 6.3% 7th -1.3pp 5th 26% below peers
Chula Vista, CA 6.4% 8th -1.0pp 6th 25% below peers
Durham, NC 10.7% 24th -1.8pp 7th 26% above peers
St. Louis, MO 9.3% 18th -1.5pp 8th 9% above peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 9.8% 20th -1.4pp 9th 15% above peers
Irvine, CA 4.0% 2nd -0.5pp 10th 53% below peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 8.5% 15th -1.1pp 11th on par with peers
Buffalo, NY 4.1% 3rd -0.5pp 12th 52% below peers
Chandler, AZ 6.6% 9th -0.7pp 13th 23% below peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 3.6% 1st -0.4pp 14th 58% below peers
Pittsburgh, PA 4.8% 5th -0.5pp 15th 43% below peers
Orlando, FL 13.9% 28th -1.3pp 16th 62% above peers
Riverside, CA 8.9% 17th -0.5pp 17th 5% above peers
Plano, TX 10.7% 23rd -0.5pp 18th 25% above peers
Laredo, TX 27.3% 31st -0.3pp 19th 221% above peers
North Las Vegas, NV 13.3% 26th -0.1pp 20th 56% above peers
Stockton, CA 6.9% 11th +0.1pp 21st 19% below peers
Saint Paul, MN 6.7% 10th +0.1pp 22nd 22% below peers
Corpus Christi, TX 17.8% 29th +0.6pp 23rd 108% above peers
Lubbock, TX 13.7% 27th +0.6pp 24th 60% above peers
Fort Wayne, IN 9.4% 19th +0.5pp 25th 11% above peers
Lexington, KY 7.2% 12th +0.4pp 26th 15% below peers
Madison, WI 4.2% 4th +0.3pp 27th 50% below peers
Cincinnati, OH 7.8% 13th +0.5pp 28th 9% below peers
Reno, NV 10.6% 22nd +0.8pp 29th 24% above peers
Newark, NJ 19.7% 30th +2.3pp 30th 131% above peers
Gilbert, AZ 6.3% 6th +1.0pp 31st 26% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 128 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthPeople without health insurance
Loading tract map…
17 of 128 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 10 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Toledo, OH down 1.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 95% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Chesapeake, VA down 1.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 94% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Portland, OR down 1.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 92% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.4pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys *Early signal: consecutive releases agree on direction only; the size of the newest movement is not measurable from overlapping surveys. about this metric
Health

Adult obesity

▼ Lower is better Level only
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Adult obesity is roughly in line with the peer median.

33.8%
20202022
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 30 similar-size cities best first
Place Latest Today's rank History Latest vs. peers
Pennsylvania ref 34.4%
United States ref 33.4%
Irvine, CA 20.3% 1st 40% below peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 24.4% 2nd 28% below peers
Chula Vista, CA 26.9% 3rd 20% below peers
Plano, TX 28.2% 4th 17% below peers
Anaheim, CA 28.2% 5th 17% below peers
Jersey City, NJ 29.1% 6th 14% below peers
Gilbert, AZ 29.8% 7th 12% below peers
Reno, NV 30.1% 8th 11% below peers
Chandler, AZ 30.2% 9th 11% below peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 30.4% 10th 10% below peers
Santa Ana, CA 30.8% 11th 9% below peers
Madison, WI 32.1% 12th 5% below peers
Saint Paul, MN 33.2% 13th 2% below peers
Orlando, FL 33.6% 14th 1% below peers
Pittsburgh, PA 33.8% 15th on par with peers
Lincoln, NE 33.8% 16th on par with peers
Durham, NC 33.9% 17th on par with peers
Lexington, KY 34.5% 18th 2% above peers
Greensboro, NC 35.1% 19th 4% above peers
Riverside, CA 35.1% 20th 4% above peers
Newark, NJ 35.1% 21st 4% above peers
Stockton, CA 35.3% 22nd 4% above peers
North Las Vegas, NV 35.5% 23rd 5% above peers
Lubbock, TX 36.6% 24th 8% above peers
St. Louis, MO 37.4% 25th 11% above peers
Buffalo, NY 38.4% 26th 14% above peers
Fort Wayne, IN 39.4% 27th 17% above peers
Cincinnati, OH 41.8% 28th 24% above peers
Laredo, TX 42.3% 29th 25% above peers
Corpus Christi, TX 42.7% 30th 26% above peers
CDC PLACES through 2022 modeled tract map about this metric
Health

Children without health insurance

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Child uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (3.3% then, 3.5% now; margin ±1.1pp).

Broader trend
27% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Child uninsured fell less than 0.1 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (3.5% to 3.5%).
Bright spot 3.5%
20122024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Pennsylvania ref 5.1% +0.7pp
United States ref 5.5% +0.4pp
Lexington, KY 3.0% 6th -1.3pp 1st 42% below peers
Jersey City, NJ 3.9% 12th -1.6pp 2nd 25% below peers
Lincoln, NE 3.8% 11th -1.4pp 3rd 27% below peers
Irvine, CA 2.2% 2nd -0.7pp 4th 57% below peers
Greensboro, NC 3.5% 9th -1.0pp 5th 32% below peers
Anaheim, CA 3.5% 8th -0.8pp 6th 32% below peers
Reno, NV 6.8% 21st -1.2pp 7th 33% above peers
Chandler, AZ 5.4% 19th -0.9pp 8th 4% above peers
Corpus Christi, TX 8.1% 26th -1.1pp 9th 57% above peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 7.3% 23rd -0.8pp 10th 43% above peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 2.2% 3rd -0.2pp 11th 56% below peers
St. Louis, MO 4.9% 15th -0.2pp 12th 5% below peers
North Las Vegas, NV 7.8% 24th -0.1pp 13th 52% above peers
Laredo, TX 14.1% 31st -0.2pp 14th 175% above peers
Saint Paul, MN 4.4% 14th -0.0pp 15th 15% below peers
Chula Vista, CA 3.6% 10th -0.0pp 16th 29% below peers
Pittsburgh, PA 3.5% 7th +0.2pp 17th 33% below peers
Riverside, CA 3.9% 13th +0.3pp 18th 25% below peers
Durham, NC 8.0% 25th +0.6pp 19th 55% above peers
Plano, TX 9.1% 27th +0.8pp 20th 77% above peers
Gilbert, AZ 5.1% 16th +0.4pp 21st on par with peers
Santa Ana, CA 5.2% 18th +0.5pp 22nd 2% above peers
Stockton, CA 2.9% 5th +0.3pp 23rd 43% below peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 5.1% 17th +0.8pp 24th on par with peers
Buffalo, NY 1.9% 1st +0.3pp 25th 62% below peers
Madison, WI 2.8% 4th +0.5pp 26th 46% below peers
Lubbock, TX 10.7% 29th +2.3pp 27th 109% above peers
Orlando, FL 9.7% 28th +2.1pp 28th 88% above peers
Fort Wayne, IN 7.3% 22nd +1.7pp 29th 42% above peers
Cincinnati, OH 5.8% 20th +1.4pp 30th 14% above peers
Newark, NJ 11.3% 30th +3.2pp 31st 120% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 128 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthChildren without health insurance
Loading tract map…
16 of 128 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 14 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

2
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Toledo, OH down 1.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Portland, OR down 0.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B27001) through 2024 ±0.9pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Health data →
Education 3 indicators
★
Education

Adults with a bachelor's degree or higher

▲ Higher is better Real improvement ★ Strong performer
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

College attainment rose 4.5 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 44.6% to 49.1% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.3pp).

Broader trend
93% of similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. Pittsburgh started among the stronger third of similar-size cities and kept improving; worth investigating.
Longer view
College attainment rose 11.9 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (37.2% to 49.1%).
Bright spot 49.1%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Pennsylvania ref 35.2% +3.7pp
United States ref 35.7% +3.5pp
Newark, NJ 19.7% 28th +4.5pp 1st 52% below peers
Santa Ana, CA 18.3% 30th +3.3pp 2nd 56% below peers
Anaheim, CA 29.7% 22nd +4.2pp 3rd 28% below peers
Durham, NC 57.3% 4th +7.7pp 4th 39% above peers
Jersey City, NJ 54.8% 5th +7.2pp 5th 33% above peers
Laredo, TX 22.0% 26th +2.6pp 6th 47% below peers
St. Louis, MO 41.1% 15th +4.8pp 7th on par with peers
Chula Vista, CA 33.2% 20th +3.8pp 8th 19% below peers
Buffalo, NY 31.2% 21st +3.5pp 9th 24% below peers
Cincinnati, OH 41.8% 12th +4.7pp 10th 2% above peers
North Las Vegas, NV 18.9% 29th +2.0pp 11th 54% below peers
Riverside, CA 25.7% 24th +2.7pp 12th 37% below peers
Orlando, FL 42.5% 11th +4.5pp 13th 3% above peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 41.5% 14th +4.3pp 14th 1% above peers
Lubbock, TX 35.1% 19th +3.6pp 15th 15% below peers
Lexington, KY 48.3% 7th +4.6pp 16th 17% above peers
Corpus Christi, TX 24.4% 25th +2.3pp 17th 41% below peers
Pittsburgh, PA 49.1% 6th +4.5pp 18th 19% above peers
Reno, NV 36.8% 18th +3.2pp 19th 11% below peers
Stockton, CA 20.0% 27th +1.7pp 20th 51% below peers
Gilbert, AZ 48.2% 8th +3.8pp 21st 17% above peers
Saint Paul, MN 43.8% 10th +3.0pp 22nd 6% above peers
Greensboro, NC 41.0% 16th +2.8pp 23rd on par with peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 38.6% 17th +2.5pp 24th 6% below peers
Chandler, AZ 47.8% 9th +3.0pp 25th 16% above peers
Plano, TX 60.5% 2nd +3.3pp 26th 47% above peers
Lincoln, NE 41.8% 13th +2.2pp 27th 2% above peers
Fort Wayne, IN 29.0% 23rd +1.2pp 28th 30% below peers
Madison, WI 59.9% 3rd +2.0pp 29th 46% above peers
Irvine, CA 70.6% 1st +1.8pp 30th 72% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 128 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationAdults with a bachelor's degree or higher
Loading tract map…
19 of 128 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 8 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.1pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Education

Children ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool

▲ Higher is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Preschool enrollment changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (51.3% then, 50.9% now; margin ±6.5pp).

Broader trend
30% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Preschool enrollment fell 7.3 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (58.2% to 50.9%).
Bright spot 50.9%
20112024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Pennsylvania ref 44.3% -2.9pp
United States ref 45.5%
Corpus Christi, TX 47.8% 12th +8.0pp 1st 7% above peers
Anaheim, CA 51.3% 8th +7.1pp 2nd 14% above peers
Riverside, CA 41.0% 20th +4.8pp 3rd 8% below peers
Chula Vista, CA 51.1% 9th +4.3pp 4th 14% above peers
Madison, WI 51.4% 7th +2.1pp 5th 15% above peers
Fort Wayne, IN 39.8% 22nd +1.1pp 6th 11% below peers
St. Louis, MO 53.8% 6th +1.0pp 7th 20% above peers
Chandler, AZ 46.9% 15th +0.8pp 8th 5% above peers
Buffalo, NY 44.2% 17th -0.1pp 9th 1% below peers
Cincinnati, OH 47.6% 14th -0.2pp 10th 6% above peers
Pittsburgh, PA 50.9% 10th -0.4pp 11th 14% above peers
Plano, TX 47.7% 13th -2.1pp 12th 6% above peers
Jersey City, NJ 73.2% 1st -3.6pp 13th 63% above peers
Saint Paul, MN 36.2% 28th -1.8pp 14th 19% below peers
Santa Ana, CA 43.0% 18th -2.8pp 15th 4% below peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 34.2% 29th -2.4pp 16th 24% below peers
Stockton, CA 39.5% 25th -2.8pp 17th 12% below peers
Newark, NJ 67.5% 2nd -5.8pp 18th 51% above peers
Lincoln, NE 41.4% 19th -3.9pp 19th 8% below peers
Orlando, FL 55.1% 5th -6.2pp 20th 23% above peers
Gilbert, AZ 50.1% 11th -6.6pp 21st 12% above peers
Greensboro, NC 37.0% 26th -4.9pp 22nd 18% below peers
Lexington, KY 41.0% 21st -7.3pp 23rd 9% below peers
Durham, NC 39.8% 23rd -7.2pp 24th 11% below peers
Lubbock, TX 39.6% 24th -7.3pp 25th 12% below peers
Reno, NV 36.8% 27th -7.2pp 26th 18% below peers
Irvine, CA 59.6% 3rd -12.5pp 27th 33% above peers
North Las Vegas, NV 26.7% 31st -6.6pp 28th 41% below peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 58.5% 4th -15.5pp 29th 31% above peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 44.8% 16th -14.2pp 30th on par with peers
Laredo, TX 33.1% 30th -14.3pp 31st 26% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 128 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationChildren ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool
Loading tract map…
24 of 128 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 28 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

1
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • St. Petersburg, FL up 11.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±5.0pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
★
Education

Teens not in school and not working

▼ Lower is better Turning down (early signal) ★ National leader
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Disconnected youth changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (3.6% then, 3.7% now; margin ±1.4pp). The newest releases lean downward: each of the last 3 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*

Broader trend
20% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Disconnected youth fell 1.6 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (5.3% to 3.7%).
Bright spot 3.7%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Pennsylvania ref 6.0% +0.4pp
United States ref 6.9% +0.3pp
Orlando, FL 4.3% 8th -4.4pp 1st 36% below peers
Chandler, AZ 4.3% 7th -3.9pp 2nd 36% below peers
St. Louis, MO 6.7% 15th -3.3pp 3rd on par with peers
Irvine, CA 1.4% 1st -0.6pp 4th 80% below peers
Fort Wayne, IN 7.1% 20th -2.3pp 5th 7% above peers
Durham, NC 4.5% 9th -1.2pp 6th 32% below peers
Greensboro, NC 5.1% 11th -1.3pp 7th 24% below peers
Laredo, TX 7.8% 22nd -1.9pp 8th 17% above peers
Newark, NJ 9.8% 26th -1.8pp 9th 47% above peers
Cincinnati, OH 7.6% 21st -0.7pp 10th 13% above peers
Madison, WI 2.2% 2nd -0.1pp 11th 67% below peers
Jersey City, NJ 7.9% 23rd -0.2pp 12th 19% above peers
Chula Vista, CA 4.9% 10th -0.1pp 13th 26% below peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 8.4% 25th +0.1pp 14th 26% above peers
Reno, NV 6.7% 16th +0.2pp 15th on par with peers
Pittsburgh, PA 3.7% 4th +0.2pp 16th 44% below peers
Riverside, CA 6.3% 12th +0.3pp 17th 6% below peers
Lubbock, TX 4.2% 6th +0.3pp 18th 36% below peers
Stockton, CA 10.1% 28th +1.0pp 19th 51% above peers
Lexington, KY 4.2% 5th +0.5pp 20th 37% below peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 12.1% 29th +1.5pp 21st 81% above peers
Saint Paul, MN 6.8% 18th +0.9pp 22nd 2% above peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 6.5% 14th +1.3pp 23rd 2% below peers
Lincoln, NE 3.5% 3rd +0.7pp 24th 48% below peers
Corpus Christi, TX 13.2% 30th +2.9pp 25th 97% above peers
Anaheim, CA 8.2% 24th +2.1pp 26th 22% above peers
Gilbert, AZ 6.7% 17th +1.9pp 27th on par with peers
Plano, TX 7.1% 19th +2.1pp 28th 6% above peers
Buffalo, NY 9.9% 27th +3.1pp 29th 49% above peers
Santa Ana, CA 6.5% 13th +2.1pp 30th 3% below peers
North Las Vegas, NV 14.1% 31st +5.0pp 31st 111% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 128 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationTeens not in school and not working
Loading tract map…
22 of 128 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 14 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B14005) through 2024 ±1.0pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys *Early signal: consecutive releases agree on direction only; the size of the newest movement is not measurable from overlapping surveys. about this metric
See all Education data →
Demographics 4 indicators
Demographics

Population

No better direction Rising
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Population rose about 1% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 302,205 to 304,759 - more than the combined survey margin (±94). That reverses the previous span, which went down between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys.

Broader trend
67% of similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction; 23% moved the other way.
Longer view
Population held roughly steady from 2014 to 2024.
304,759
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
North Las Vegas, NV 278,595 24th +15% 1st 6% below peers
Gilbert, AZ 280,262 22nd +15% 2nd 5% below peers
Irvine, CA 311,690 10th +14% 3rd 6% above peers
Orlando, FL 319,758 5th +14% 4th 8% above peers
Jersey City, NJ 294,078 17th +12% 5th on par with peers
Chandler, AZ 280,136 23rd +11% 6th 5% below peers
Reno, NV 273,212 28th +11% 7th 7% below peers
Newark, NJ 310,178 12th +10% 8th 5% above peers
Madison, WI 278,001 25th +9% 9th 6% below peers
Durham, NC 291,467 18th +8% 10th 1% below peers
Buffalo, NY 276,854 26th +8% 11th 6% below peers
Lubbock, TX 264,814 30th +4% 12th 10% below peers
Stockton, CA 322,326 4th +4% 13th 9% above peers
Lincoln, NE 294,856 16th +4% 14th on par with peers
Greensboro, NC 301,198 15th +3% 15th 2% above peers
Cincinnati, OH 311,224 11th +3% 16th 6% above peers
Chula Vista, CA 276,375 27th +3% 17th 6% below peers
Plano, TX 290,594 19th +1% 18th 1% below peers
Fort Wayne, IN 268,589 29th +1% 19th 9% below peers
Lexington, KY 323,725 3rd +1% 20th 10% above peers
Saint Paul, MN 307,284 13th +1% 21st 4% above peers
Pittsburgh, PA 304,759 14th +1% 22nd 3% above peers
Laredo, TX 257,619 31st -1% 23rd 13% below peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 345,482 1st -1% 24th 17% above peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 288,976 20th -2% 25th 2% below peers
Anaheim, CA 344,521 2nd -2% 26th 17% above peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 317,995 7th -2% 27th 8% above peers
Riverside, CA 319,069 6th -2% 28th 8% above peers
Corpus Christi, TX 317,419 8th -3% 29th 8% above peers
Santa Ana, CA 312,534 9th -6% 30th 6% above peers
St. Louis, MO 288,512 21st -6% 31st 2% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 128 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsPopulation
Loading tract map…
17 of 128 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±73 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Children's share of the population

No better direction No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Children changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (15.1% then, 14.6% now; margin ±0.6pp).

Broader trend
67% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Children fell 0.9 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (15.4% to 14.6%).
Big move 14.6%
20172024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Pennsylvania ref 20.4% -0.4pp
United States ref 21.9% -0.7pp
Orlando, FL 21.4% 20th +0.3pp 1st 4% below peers
Newark, NJ 24.8% 5th +0.2pp 2nd 12% above peers
Lexington, KY 21.0% 21st +0.1pp 3rd 5% below peers
Greensboro, NC 21.7% 18th -0.1pp 4th 2% below peers
Madison, WI 16.1% 29th -0.2pp 5th 28% below peers
Buffalo, NY 22.3% 15th -0.3pp 6th 1% above peers
Lubbock, TX 22.9% 13th -0.4pp 7th 3% above peers
Irvine, CA 21.7% 19th -0.4pp 8th 2% below peers
Lincoln, NE 21.9% 17th -0.7pp 9th 1% below peers
Pittsburgh, PA 14.6% 31st -0.5pp 10th 34% below peers
Riverside, CA 23.1% 11th -0.8pp 11th 4% above peers
Chula Vista, CA 24.5% 6th -0.8pp 12th 10% above peers
Stockton, CA 26.7% 3rd -1.0pp 13th 20% above peers
Fort Wayne, IN 24.3% 7th -1.0pp 14th 10% above peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 16.5% 28th -0.7pp 15th 26% below peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 23.5% 8th -1.0pp 16th 6% above peers
Jersey City, NJ 19.7% 26th -0.9pp 17th 11% below peers
Corpus Christi, TX 23.4% 10th -1.2pp 18th 6% above peers
Laredo, TX 31.3% 1st -1.8pp 19th 41% above peers
St. Louis, MO 18.3% 27th -1.1pp 20th 17% below peers
Cincinnati, OH 20.7% 23rd -1.3pp 21st 7% below peers
Saint Paul, MN 23.5% 9th -1.5pp 22nd 6% above peers
Gilbert, AZ 28.1% 2nd -1.8pp 23rd 27% above peers
Reno, NV 19.9% 25th -1.4pp 24th 10% below peers
Plano, TX 20.9% 22nd -1.6pp 25th 6% below peers
Durham, NC 20.1% 24th -1.6pp 26th 10% below peers
Anaheim, CA 22.2% 16th -1.8pp 27th on par with peers
Chandler, AZ 22.8% 14th -2.4pp 28th 3% above peers
North Las Vegas, NV 25.5% 4th -3.2pp 29th 15% above peers
Santa Ana, CA 22.9% 12th -4.0pp 30th 3% above peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 15.3% 30th -2.9pp 31st 31% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 128 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren's share of the population
Loading tract map…
18 of 128 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 8 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.5pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Children in single-parent families

No better direction No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Single-parent changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (44.7% then, 42.6% now; margin ±4.0pp).

Broader trend
37% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Single-parent fell 6.5 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (49.1% to 42.6%).
Big move 42.6%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Pennsylvania ref 30.6% -0.4pp
United States ref 29.9% -0.2pp
Chandler, AZ 27.9% 25th +5.1pp 1st 24% below peers
Irvine, CA 17.7% 31st +3.2pp 2nd 52% below peers
Gilbert, AZ 19.9% 29th +3.5pp 3rd 46% below peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 27.7% 26th +3.9pp 4th 25% below peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 31.6% 20th +4.2pp 5th 15% below peers
Laredo, TX 39.6% 10th +4.4pp 6th 7% above peers
Madison, WI 31.3% 21st +3.5pp 7th 16% below peers
Anaheim, CA 29.7% 23rd +2.3pp 8th 20% below peers
Stockton, CA 41.2% 8th +3.1pp 9th 11% above peers
Reno, NV 38.0% 13th +2.6pp 10th 3% above peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 68.2% 1st +3.3pp 11th 84% above peers
Plano, TX 19.4% 30th +0.7pp 12th 47% below peers
Santa Ana, CA 29.5% 24th +0.9pp 13th 20% below peers
Saint Paul, MN 39.6% 11th +1.2pp 14th 7% above peers
Lincoln, NE 26.7% 27th +0.8pp 15th 28% below peers
Fort Wayne, IN 40.3% 9th +0.5pp 16th 9% above peers
Corpus Christi, TX 37.0% 16th +0.4pp 17th on par with peers
North Las Vegas, NV 37.2% 15th +0.3pp 18th 1% above peers
Newark, NJ 58.1% 2nd -0.2pp 19th 57% above peers
Riverside, CA 30.1% 22nd -0.6pp 20th 19% below peers
Greensboro, NC 42.9% 6th -1.1pp 21st 16% above peers
Lexington, KY 31.7% 18th -1.2pp 22nd 14% below peers
Pittsburgh, PA 42.6% 7th -2.1pp 23rd 15% above peers
Buffalo, NY 52.2% 4th -3.6pp 24th 41% above peers
St. Louis, MO 52.2% 5th -4.0pp 25th 41% above peers
Lubbock, TX 35.6% 17th -2.8pp 26th 4% below peers
Cincinnati, OH 56.2% 3rd -6.5pp 27th 52% above peers
Orlando, FL 38.9% 12th -5.0pp 28th 5% above peers
Chula Vista, CA 23.6% 28th -3.3pp 29th 36% below peers
Jersey City, NJ 31.6% 19th -4.9pp 30th 15% below peers
Durham, NC 37.4% 14th -5.9pp 31st 1% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 128 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren in single-parent families
Loading tract map…
18 of 128 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 17 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B09002) through 2024 ±2.9pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Young children with all parents in the labor force

No better direction No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Working parents changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (69.8% then, 69.1% now; margin ±5.6pp).

Broader trend
30% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Working parents fell 1.3 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (70.4% to 69.1%).
69.1%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Pennsylvania ref 70.1% +0.7pp
United States ref 68.1% +1.9pp
Gilbert, AZ 70.7% 10th +15.2pp 1st 4% above peers
Buffalo, NY 65.5% 20th +7.7pp 2nd 4% below peers
North Las Vegas, NV 69.3% 12th +8.0pp 3rd 2% above peers
Irvine, CA 61.7% 28th +6.5pp 4th 9% below peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 68.2% 15th +6.0pp 5th on par with peers
Riverside, CA 67.2% 19th +5.6pp 6th 1% below peers
Chula Vista, CA 71.4% 9th +5.5pp 7th 5% above peers
Laredo, TX 56.3% 31st +4.2pp 8th 17% below peers
Anaheim, CA 68.2% 16th +4.6pp 9th on par with peers
Jersey City, NJ 65.3% 22nd +4.2pp 10th 4% below peers
Chandler, AZ 67.6% 18th +4.2pp 11th 1% below peers
Stockton, CA 63.5% 25th +3.8pp 12th 7% below peers
Plano, TX 59.9% 30th +3.3pp 13th 12% below peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 68.5% 14th +3.2pp 14th 1% above peers
Santa Ana, CA 62.8% 26th +2.4pp 15th 8% below peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 65.5% 21st +1.5pp 16th 4% below peers
Newark, NJ 72.3% 7th +1.5pp 17th 6% above peers
Lexington, KY 74.2% 5th +1.1pp 18th 9% above peers
Reno, NV 75.1% 2nd +0.3pp 19th 10% above peers
Durham, NC 74.5% 4th -0.5pp 20th 9% above peers
Madison, WI 75.9% 1st -0.7pp 21st 11% above peers
Pittsburgh, PA 69.1% 13th -0.7pp 22nd 1% above peers
Greensboro, NC 69.6% 11th -0.8pp 23rd 2% above peers
Corpus Christi, TX 60.9% 29th -0.8pp 24th 11% below peers
Lubbock, TX 67.8% 17th -1.0pp 25th on par with peers
Orlando, FL 71.5% 8th -1.8pp 26th 5% above peers
Lincoln, NE 73.5% 6th -1.9pp 27th 8% above peers
St. Louis, MO 74.5% 3rd -2.2pp 28th 9% above peers
Saint Paul, MN 64.9% 23rd -6.9pp 29th 5% below peers
Cincinnati, OH 64.5% 24th -7.3pp 30th 5% below peers
Fort Wayne, IN 62.2% 27th -8.3pp 31st 9% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 128 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsYoung children with all parents in the labor force
Loading tract map…
20 of 128 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 18 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B23008) through 2024 ±4.5pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Demographics data →