DataWorks Commons
Urban Honolulu, HI
← All cities

Urban Honolulu, HI

See all data for this place →
345,482 people (2024) 250k-1m West

Bright spots 6 indicators

Where Urban Honolulu, HI shows a real improvement in recent years, or stands clearly ahead of its peers. How this is calculated →

What needs attention 7 indicators

Where Urban Honolulu, HI shows a real worsening in recent years, or trails its peers clearly. How this is calculated →

Big shifts 4 indicators

Real moves and big gaps, where neither direction is simply good or bad. Biggest relative change first; big-gap cards come last. How this is calculated →

All indicators

Economy
Economy

Median household income

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Household income rose about 21% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from $71,465 to $86,504 (each survey's own dollars, not adjusted for inflation) - more than the combined survey margin (±$2,048). 30 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the stronger third of similar-size cities and kept improving; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 30 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: household income rose about 43% from 2014 to 2024 ($60,548 to $86,504).
$86,504
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Hawaii ref $100,389 +24%
United States ref $80,734 +28%
Newark, NJ $52,060 29th +48% 1st 31% below peers
Stockton, CA $79,907 15th +46% 2nd 6% above peers
Santa Ana, CA $93,999 8th +42% 3rd 25% above peers
Tampa, FL $75,475 16th +40% 4th on par with peers
Orlando, FL $72,336 19th +40% 5th 4% below peers
Durham, NC $81,619 13th +39% 6th 8% above peers
Jersey City, NJ $97,710 6th +38% 7th 29% above peers
New Orleans, LA $56,631 26th +36% 8th 25% below peers
Aurora, CO $88,368 11th +36% 9th 17% above peers
Pittsburgh, PA $65,742 23rd +35% 10th 13% below peers
Anaheim, CA $95,227 7th +33% 11th 26% above peers
Cleveland, OH $40,801 30th +32% 12th 46% below peers
Riverside, CA $91,045 9th +32% 13th 21% above peers
Chandler, AZ $108,095 4th +30% 14th 43% above peers
Cincinnati, OH $52,909 28th +30% 15th 30% below peers
Irvine, CA $136,719 1st +30% 16th 81% above peers
St. Louis, MO $56,160 27th +28% 17th 26% below peers
Bakersfield, CA $80,540 14th +28% 18th 7% above peers
Saint Paul, MN $73,394 18th +27% 19th 3% below peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR $28,562 31st +27% 20th 62% below peers
Gilbert, AZ $122,551 2nd +27% 21st 62% above peers
Greensboro, NC $61,515 25th +26% 22nd 18% below peers
Lincoln, NE $71,867 20th +24% 23rd 5% below peers
Arlington, TX $75,171 17th +24% 24th on par with peers
Wichita, KS $64,620 24th +23% 25th 14% below peers
Anchorage municipality, AK $103,284 5th +22% 26th 37% above peers
Henderson, NV $90,138 10th +22% 27th 19% above peers
Lexington, KY $69,479 21st +21% 28th 8% below peers
Urban Honolulu, HI $86,504 12th +21% 29th 15% above peers
Corpus Christi, TX $67,394 22nd +20% 30th 11% below peers
Plano, TX $112,253 3rd +17% 31st 49% above peers
Where is this changing? 132 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyMedian household income
Loading tract map…
72 of 132 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 4 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Santa Ana, CA up about 42% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 94% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Jersey City, NJ up about 38% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 84% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Denver, CO up about 38% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 83% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±$1,705 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Share of people below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Poverty rose 1.4 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 10.3% to 11.6% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.0pp). That reverses the previous span, which went down between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys. 1 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 17 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: poverty held roughly steady from 2014 to 2024.
11.6%
20112024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Hawaii ref 9.8% +0.6pp
United States ref 12.0%
Santa Ana, CA 10.7% 7th -4.8pp 1st 27% below peers
Durham, NC 11.3% 8th -4.0pp 2nd 22% below peers
Irvine, CA 10.3% 6th -2.6pp 3rd 29% below peers
Tampa, FL 14.8% 17th -3.2pp 4th 2% above peers
Saint Paul, MN 15.2% 18th -3.2pp 5th 5% above peers
Anaheim, CA 12.3% 13th -2.3pp 6th 15% below peers
Orlando, FL 14.5% 16th -2.6pp 7th on par with peers
Newark, NJ 22.6% 28th -3.7pp 8th 56% above peers
Stockton, CA 15.3% 19th -2.3pp 9th 5% above peers
Arlington, TX 12.6% 14th -1.8pp 10th 13% below peers
Riverside, CA 11.7% 10th -1.6pp 11th 19% below peers
Lexington, KY 14.4% 15th -1.8pp 12th 1% below peers
Jersey City, NJ 15.5% 20th -1.5pp 13th 7% above peers
Greensboro, NC 16.1% 22nd -1.5pp 14th 11% above peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 37.8% 31st -2.8pp 15th 161% above peers
Cleveland, OH 29.7% 30th -2.0pp 16th 105% above peers
Bakersfield, CA 16.2% 23rd -1.0pp 17th 12% above peers
Lincoln, NE 12.2% 12th -0.7pp 18th 16% below peers
St. Louis, MO 20.0% 26th -1.2pp 19th 38% above peers
New Orleans, LA 21.8% 27th -1.1pp 20th 50% above peers
Cincinnati, OH 24.5% 29th -0.8pp 21st 69% above peers
Pittsburgh, PA 18.5% 25th -0.5pp 22nd 27% above peers
Gilbert, AZ 5.2% 1st -0.1pp 23rd 64% below peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 8.8% 4th -0.1pp 24th 40% below peers
Wichita, KS 15.6% 21st -0.1pp 25th 8% above peers
Plano, TX 6.7% 2nd -0.0pp 26th 54% below peers
Chandler, AZ 7.9% 3rd +0.3pp 27th 46% below peers
Corpus Christi, TX 16.8% 24th +1.0pp 28th 15% above peers
Aurora, CO 11.8% 11th +1.2pp 29th 18% below peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 11.6% 9th +1.4pp 30th 20% below peers
Henderson, NV 8.9% 5th +1.0pp 31st 39% below peers
Where is this changing? 132 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of people below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
73 of 132 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 1 has too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Colorado Springs, CO down 2.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 96% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Irvine, CA down 2.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 94% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Denver, CO down 1.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 73% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.7pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Share of children below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Child poverty rose 2.8 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 12.2% to 14.9% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.7pp). That reverses the previous span, which went down between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys. 2 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 17 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: child poverty fell 1.0 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (15.9% to 14.9%).
14.9%
20132024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Hawaii ref 12.1% +0.1pp
United States ref 16.1%
Santa Ana, CA 14.6% 8th -8.8pp 1st 24% below peers
Durham, NC 16.6% 12th -7.9pp 2nd 13% below peers
Anaheim, CA 15.3% 11th -6.9pp 3rd 20% below peers
Tampa, FL 19.2% 16th -7.3pp 4th on par with peers
Saint Paul, MN 22.0% 20th -5.6pp 5th 15% above peers
Arlington, TX 17.7% 13th -4.4pp 6th 8% below peers
Riverside, CA 14.8% 9th -3.2pp 7th 23% below peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 10.8% 6th -2.3pp 8th 44% below peers
Newark, NJ 31.2% 27th -6.6pp 9th 63% above peers
Orlando, FL 20.6% 17th -3.8pp 10th 8% above peers
Stockton, CA 20.8% 18th -3.3pp 11th 9% above peers
Lexington, KY 17.9% 14th -2.6pp 12th 7% below peers
St. Louis, MO 29.7% 25th -4.2pp 13th 55% above peers
Greensboro, NC 23.5% 23rd -3.2pp 14th 22% above peers
Gilbert, AZ 5.0% 1st -0.4pp 15th 74% below peers
Jersey City, NJ 22.9% 22nd -1.9pp 16th 20% above peers
Cincinnati, OH 36.2% 29th -2.7pp 17th 89% above peers
Cleveland, OH 44.9% 30th -3.3pp 18th 134% above peers
Plano, TX 7.9% 2nd -0.5pp 19th 59% below peers
Bakersfield, CA 22.0% 21st -1.2pp 20th 15% above peers
New Orleans, LA 32.5% 28th -1.7pp 21st 69% above peers
Lincoln, NE 13.6% 7th -0.6pp 22nd 29% below peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 58.6% 31st -1.9pp 23rd 206% above peers
Wichita, KS 21.8% 19th -0.2pp 24th 14% above peers
Chandler, AZ 9.9% 4th +0.4pp 25th 48% below peers
Corpus Christi, TX 25.0% 24th +2.0pp 26th 30% above peers
Irvine, CA 8.6% 3rd +0.7pp 27th 55% below peers
Henderson, NV 10.7% 5th +1.1pp 28th 44% below peers
Pittsburgh, PA 30.8% 26th +3.7pp 29th 61% above peers
Aurora, CO 18.1% 15th +3.1pp 30th 6% below peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 14.9% 10th +2.8pp 31st 22% below peers
Where is this changing? 132 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of children below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
75 of 132 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 3 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Colorado Springs, CO down 5.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Anchorage municipality, AK down 2.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 72% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Riverside, CA down 3.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 71% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.3pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Households with a broadband internet subscription

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Broadband rose 5.9 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 83.4% to 89.4% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.9pp). 29 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started mid-pack and has reached a genuinely better level; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 29 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: broadband rose 9.4 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (80.0% to 89.3%).
89.4%
20172024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Hawaii ref 92.2% +7.1pp
United States ref 91.1%
San Juan zona urbana, PR 75.7% 31st +18.9pp 1st 18% below peers
Greensboro, NC 91.0% 22nd +17.9pp 2nd 2% below peers
Newark, NJ 86.5% 29th +16.7pp 3rd 7% below peers
Cleveland, OH 84.8% 30th +16.1pp 4th 8% below peers
New Orleans, LA 86.6% 28th +13.1pp 5th 6% below peers
St. Louis, MO 86.9% 27th +12.5pp 6th 6% below peers
Stockton, CA 91.8% 19th +12.5pp 7th 1% below peers
Wichita, KS 91.6% 21st +10.2pp 8th 1% below peers
Cincinnati, OH 89.3% 26th +9.6pp 9th 4% below peers
Pittsburgh, PA 90.6% 23rd +8.8pp 10th 2% below peers
Tampa, FL 93.6% 11th +8.3pp 11th 1% above peers
Santa Ana, CA 92.2% 18th +7.9pp 12th on par with peers
Corpus Christi, TX 89.6% 24th +7.0pp 13th 3% below peers
Jersey City, NJ 92.6% 15th +6.8pp 14th on par with peers
Bakersfield, CA 94.1% 8th +6.8pp 15th 2% above peers
Durham, NC 93.7% 9th +6.7pp 16th 1% above peers
Arlington, TX 92.4% 17th +6.6pp 17th on par with peers
Riverside, CA 94.4% 7th +6.5pp 18th 2% above peers
Orlando, FL 93.2% 12th +6.3pp 19th 1% above peers
Saint Paul, MN 91.8% 20th +6.2pp 20th 1% below peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 89.3% 25th +5.9pp 21st 3% below peers
Aurora, CO 93.7% 10th +6.1pp 22nd 1% above peers
Lexington, KY 92.6% 16th +5.7pp 23rd on par with peers
Henderson, NV 94.8% 5th +5.7pp 24th 2% above peers
Lincoln, NE 92.9% 14th +5.1pp 25th on par with peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 94.6% 6th +4.5pp 26th 2% above peers
Anaheim, CA 93.1% 13th +3.7pp 27th 1% above peers
Chandler, AZ 95.4% 4th +3.5pp 28th 3% above peers
Plano, TX 96.7% 2nd +2.6pp 29th 4% above peers
Irvine, CA 95.8% 3rd +1.9pp 30th 4% above peers
Gilbert, AZ 97.0% 1st +1.1pp 31st 5% above peers
Where is this changing? 132 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds with a broadband internet subscription
Loading tract map…
73 of 132 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Oklahoma City, OK up 9.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 68% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Oakland, CA up 8.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 66% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Long Beach, CA up 8.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 65% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.6pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Income inequality (Gini index)

▼ Lower is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Inequality rose about 2% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 0.47 to 0.48 - more than the combined survey margin (±0.01). 3 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 5 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: inequality rose about 6% from 2014 to 2024 (0.45 to 0.48).
0.48
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Hawaii ref 0.45 +0.009
United States ref 0.48 +0.001
Stockton, CA 0.44 8th -0.031 1st 5% below peers
New Orleans, LA 0.55 30th -0.017 2nd 19% above peers
Irvine, CA 0.46 13th -0.011 3rd on par with peers
Jersey City, NJ 0.51 25th -0.010 4th 10% above peers
Orlando, FL 0.49 20th -0.008 5th 6% above peers
Riverside, CA 0.42 3rd -0.007 6th 9% below peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 0.61 31st -0.009 7th 32% above peers
Newark, NJ 0.50 23rd -0.007 8th 7% above peers
Greensboro, NC 0.49 21st -0.005 9th 6% above peers
Bakersfield, CA 0.45 11th -0.005 10th 3% below peers
Cleveland, OH 0.51 26th -0.005 11th 10% above peers
Durham, NC 0.46 14th -0.003 12th on par with peers
Santa Ana, CA 0.40 2nd -0.001 13th 13% below peers
St. Louis, MO 0.50 24th -0.001 14th 9% above peers
Plano, TX 0.45 9th -0.001 15th 4% below peers
Chandler, AZ 0.42 4th -0.001 16th 9% below peers
Lexington, KY 0.49 22nd -0.001 17th 6% above peers
Saint Paul, MN 0.48 18th -0.000 18th 4% above peers
Tampa, FL 0.54 28th +0.001 19th 17% above peers
Pittsburgh, PA 0.52 27th +0.001 20th 13% above peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 0.43 6th +0.001 21st 7% below peers
Cincinnati, OH 0.54 29th +0.003 22nd 17% above peers
Corpus Christi, TX 0.46 15th +0.003 23rd on par with peers
Lincoln, NE 0.45 12th +0.003 24th 3% below peers
Arlington, TX 0.44 7th +0.005 25th 5% below peers
Henderson, NV 0.46 16th +0.006 26th on par with peers
Wichita, KS 0.47 17th +0.009 27th 2% above peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 0.48 19th +0.011 28th 5% above peers
Gilbert, AZ 0.39 1st +0.013 29th 15% below peers
Anaheim, CA 0.45 10th +0.015 30th 4% below peers
Aurora, CO 0.43 5th +0.020 31st 7% below peers
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B19083) through 2024 ±0.01 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Households receiving SNAP

▼ Lower is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →

SNAP rose 1.0 percentage points between the 2014-2018 and 2019-2023 surveys, from 9.8% to 10.7% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.8pp). 6 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening beyond the survey margin, 2014-2018 vs 2019-2023 surveys; 19 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: snap rose 1.8 percentage points from 2013 to 2023 (9.0% to 10.8%).
10.7%
20102023
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2019-2023 survey Today's rank Change2014-2018 → 2019-2023 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Hawaii ref 11.2% +0.1pp
United States ref 11.8% -0.5pp
Santa Ana, CA 11.3% 15th -4.7pp 1st 19% below peers
Durham, NC 9.3% 9th -2.7pp 2nd 34% below peers
Tampa, FL 15.7% 20th -3.6pp 3rd 12% above peers
Lexington, KY 8.5% 6th -1.9pp 4th 39% below peers
Jersey City, NJ 14.0% 17th -2.9pp 5th on par with peers
Saint Paul, MN 15.0% 19th -2.9pp 6th 7% above peers
Gilbert, AZ 3.4% 1st -0.6pp 7th 76% below peers
St. Louis, MO 18.0% 25th -3.3pp 8th 29% above peers
Orlando, FL 15.0% 18th -2.3pp 9th 7% above peers
Cincinnati, OH 18.3% 26th -2.6pp 10th 31% above peers
Newark, NJ 23.7% 29th -3.3pp 11th 69% above peers
Arlington, TX 10.4% 10th -1.4pp 12th 26% below peers
Cleveland, OH 31.5% 30th -3.1pp 13th 125% above peers
Wichita, KS 11.1% 14th -1.0pp 14th 20% below peers
Pittsburgh, PA 16.5% 21st -0.7pp 15th 18% above peers
Chandler, AZ 5.3% 4th -0.2pp 16th 62% below peers
Lincoln, NE 8.9% 8th -0.0pp 17th 36% below peers
New Orleans, LA 18.5% 27th +0.0pp 18th 32% above peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 8.8% 7th +0.1pp 19th 37% below peers
Corpus Christi, TX 16.8% 22nd +0.3pp 20th 20% above peers
Stockton, CA 20.8% 28th +0.8pp 21st 49% above peers
Riverside, CA 11.1% 13th +0.5pp 22nd 20% below peers
Bakersfield, CA 16.8% 23rd +1.1pp 23rd 20% above peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 10.8% 11th +1.0pp 24th 23% below peers
Aurora, CO 10.8% 12th +1.0pp 25th 23% below peers
Greensboro, NC 17.4% 24th +1.8pp 26th 24% above peers
Plano, TX 3.4% 2nd +0.5pp 27th 75% below peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 34.6% 31st +5.9pp 28th 147% above peers
Henderson, NV 7.7% 5th +1.4pp 29th 45% below peers
Anaheim, CA 14.0% 16th +2.7pp 30th on par with peers
Irvine, CA 4.9% 3rd +2.3pp 31st 65% below peers
Where is this changing? 132 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2018 to 2023, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds receiving SNAP
Loading tract map…
73 of 132 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Irving, TX down 2.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2018-2023
  • Austin, TX down 1.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 95% of this group · 2018-2023
  • Mesa, AZ down 1.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 91% of this group · 2018-2023
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2023 ±0.6pp at 90% confidence (2023 estimate) survey trend: 2014-2018 vs 2019-2023 surveys about this metric
See all Economy data →
Housing
Housing

Homeownership rate

▲ Higher is better Improving (small)
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Homeownership rose 4.2 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 44.8% to 48.9% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.3pp). 14 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 16 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: homeownership rose 5.8 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (43.1% to 48.9%).
48.9%
20112024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Hawaii ref 63.0% +4.1pp
United States ref 65.2%
Orlando, FL 39.5% 29th +4.1pp 1st 25% below peers
Stockton, CA 53.9% 13th +5.2pp 2nd 3% above peers
Newark, NJ 24.4% 31st +2.1pp 3rd 54% below peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 48.9% 21st +4.2pp 4th 7% below peers
New Orleans, LA 51.2% 18th +2.9pp 5th 3% below peers
Cincinnati, OH 39.8% 28th +2.1pp 6th 24% below peers
Riverside, CA 56.8% 10th +2.8pp 7th 8% above peers
Saint Paul, MN 52.9% 15th +2.5pp 8th 1% above peers
Durham, NC 52.3% 17th +2.1pp 9th on par with peers
Aurora, CO 62.4% 5th +2.5pp 10th 19% above peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 63.9% 4th +2.6pp 11th 22% above peers
St. Louis, MO 45.3% 24th +1.6pp 12th 14% below peers
Tampa, FL 50.3% 20th +1.8pp 13th 4% below peers
Henderson, NV 66.1% 2nd +2.0pp 14th 26% above peers
Anaheim, CA 46.2% 23rd +1.4pp 15th 12% below peers
Bakersfield, CA 60.6% 6th +1.5pp 16th 15% above peers
Corpus Christi, TX 57.9% 8th +1.2pp 17th 10% above peers
Pittsburgh, PA 47.7% 22nd +0.5pp 18th 9% below peers
Greensboro, NC 50.5% 19th +0.2pp 19th 4% below peers
Cleveland, OH 41.7% 27th +0.2pp 20th 21% below peers
Wichita, KS 58.9% 7th +0.1pp 21st 12% above peers
Chandler, AZ 65.0% 3rd +0.1pp 22nd 24% above peers
Gilbert, AZ 73.1% 1st -0.7pp 23rd 39% above peers
Lexington, KY 53.8% 14th -0.7pp 24th 2% above peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 52.5% 16th -0.8pp 25th on par with peers
Lincoln, NE 56.1% 11th -0.9pp 26th 7% above peers
Arlington, TX 54.3% 12th -0.9pp 27th 3% above peers
Santa Ana, CA 44.6% 25th -1.5pp 28th 15% below peers
Plano, TX 56.9% 9th -2.2pp 29th 8% above peers
Jersey City, NJ 27.9% 30th -1.2pp 30th 47% below peers
Irvine, CA 44.5% 26th -2.4pp 31st 15% below peers
Where is this changing? 132 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHomeownership rate
Loading tract map…
73 of 132 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.0pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Housing

Housing cost-burdened households

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Cost burden changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (43.2% then, 43.6% now; margin ±1.5pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 11 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: cost burden fell 1.1 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (44.8% to 43.6%).
43.6%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Hawaii ref 39.8% +0.4pp
United States ref 32.2% +0.4pp
Santa Ana, CA 42.6% 26th -4.5pp 1st 9% above peers
St. Louis, MO 34.2% 10th -3.2pp 2nd 12% below peers
Newark, NJ 53.8% 31st -4.6pp 3rd 38% above peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 36.6% 14th -2.9pp 4th 6% below peers
Stockton, CA 41.0% 22nd -2.2pp 5th 5% above peers
Durham, NC 31.9% 7th -1.6pp 6th 18% below peers
Wichita, KS 28.1% 3rd -0.7pp 7th 28% below peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 31.1% 6th -0.7pp 8th 20% below peers
Jersey City, NJ 41.7% 23rd -0.8pp 9th 7% above peers
New Orleans, LA 45.3% 28th -0.8pp 10th 16% above peers
Irvine, CA 42.5% 24th -0.4pp 11th 9% above peers
Anaheim, CA 47.3% 30th -0.3pp 12th 22% above peers
Cleveland, OH 40.7% 20th +0.2pp 13th 5% above peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 43.6% 27th +0.4pp 14th 12% above peers
Cincinnati, OH 38.9% 16th +0.4pp 15th on par with peers
Pittsburgh, PA 33.6% 9th +0.4pp 16th 14% below peers
Bakersfield, CA 39.7% 18th +1.0pp 17th 2% above peers
Chandler, AZ 27.1% 2nd +0.7pp 18th 30% below peers
Gilbert, AZ 25.3% 1st +0.6pp 19th 35% below peers
Riverside, CA 42.5% 25th +1.5pp 20th 9% above peers
Tampa, FL 40.9% 21st +1.7pp 21st 5% above peers
Aurora, CO 39.7% 19th +1.7pp 22nd 2% above peers
Saint Paul, MN 35.7% 13th +1.5pp 23rd 8% below peers
Orlando, FL 46.0% 29th +2.0pp 24th 18% above peers
Lexington, KY 32.1% 8th +1.6pp 25th 17% below peers
Greensboro, NC 36.9% 15th +2.0pp 26th 5% below peers
Lincoln, NE 30.3% 4th +1.9pp 27th 22% below peers
Corpus Christi, TX 35.1% 12th +2.6pp 28th 10% below peers
Henderson, NV 34.9% 11th +3.6pp 29th 10% below peers
Plano, TX 30.5% 5th +3.4pp 30th 22% below peers
Arlington, TX 39.6% 17th +5.5pp 31st 2% above peers
Where is this changing? 132 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHousing cost-burdened households
Loading tract map…
73 of 132 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Santa Ana, CA down 4.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Newark, NJ down 4.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
  • San Juan zona urbana, PR down 2.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 96% of this group · 2019-2024
Housing

Households without a vehicle

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

No vehicle changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (16.6% then, 16.6% now; margin ±1.1pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 14 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: no vehicle fell 1.2 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (17.8% to 16.6%).
16.6%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Hawaii ref 8.2% +0.1pp
United States ref 8.3% -0.3pp
Stockton, CA 7.2% 15th -2.0pp 1st on par with peers
Riverside, CA 4.5% 5th -1.2pp 2nd 37% below peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 20.4% 27th -4.8pp 3rd 184% above peers
Durham, NC 7.2% 17th -1.4pp 4th on par with peers
Cincinnati, OH 17.1% 24th -2.8pp 5th 137% above peers
Tampa, FL 8.5% 21st -1.4pp 6th 18% above peers
Wichita, KS 6.4% 11th -1.0pp 7th 12% below peers
Pittsburgh, PA 20.6% 28th -2.7pp 8th 186% above peers
Chandler, AZ 3.3% 2nd -0.4pp 9th 54% below peers
Newark, NJ 34.3% 30th -4.1pp 10th 376% above peers
Lexington, KY 7.2% 16th -0.7pp 11th on par with peers
Orlando, FL 7.4% 19th -0.6pp 12th 3% above peers
Corpus Christi, TX 7.0% 14th -0.5pp 13th 3% below peers
New Orleans, LA 17.4% 25th -1.1pp 14th 142% above peers
St. Louis, MO 18.5% 26th -1.2pp 15th 157% above peers
Cleveland, OH 22.1% 29th -1.0pp 16th 206% above peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 5.8% 9th -0.2pp 17th 19% below peers
Saint Paul, MN 13.0% 22nd -0.3pp 18th 81% above peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 16.6% 23rd +0.0pp 19th 131% above peers
Anaheim, CA 5.6% 8th +0.2pp 20th 23% below peers
Jersey City, NJ 40.3% 31st +1.8pp 21st 459% above peers
Aurora, CO 6.6% 12th +0.5pp 22nd 9% below peers
Greensboro, NC 8.2% 20th +0.6pp 23rd 13% above peers
Henderson, NV 4.3% 4th +0.3pp 24th 40% below peers
Santa Ana, CA 6.0% 10th +0.5pp 25th 16% below peers
Irvine, CA 5.3% 7th +0.5pp 26th 27% below peers
Lincoln, NE 6.7% 13th +0.8pp 27th 7% below peers
Plano, TX 3.7% 3rd +0.5pp 28th 48% below peers
Bakersfield, CA 7.4% 18th +1.3pp 29th 2% above peers
Arlington, TX 5.0% 6th +0.9pp 30th 30% below peers
Gilbert, AZ 2.3% 1st +0.6pp 31st 68% below peers
Where is this changing? 132 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHouseholds without a vehicle
Loading tract map…
73 of 132 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Buffalo, NY down 5.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 94% of this group · 2019-2024
  • San Juan zona urbana, PR down 4.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 93% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Detroit, MI down 3.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 88% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B08201) through 2024 ±0.9pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Housing data →
Health
Health

People without health insurance

▼ Lower is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Uninsured fell 0.4 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 3.8% to 3.4% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.4pp). 13 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the stronger third of similar-size cities and kept improving; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 16 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: uninsured fell 3.2 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (6.7% to 3.4%).
3.4%
20122024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Hawaii ref 3.5% -0.3pp
United States ref 8.2% -0.4pp
Jersey City, NJ 8.5% 17th -2.8pp 1st 1% above peers
Santa Ana, CA 12.1% 25th -3.4pp 2nd 44% above peers
Greensboro, NC 8.3% 15th -1.8pp 3rd 1% below peers
Anaheim, CA 9.9% 21st -2.1pp 4th 17% above peers
Lincoln, NE 6.2% 4th -1.3pp 5th 26% below peers
Durham, NC 10.7% 24th -1.8pp 6th 26% above peers
St. Louis, MO 9.2% 19th -1.5pp 7th 9% above peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 9.4% 20th -1.4pp 8th 11% above peers
Irvine, CA 4.0% 2nd -0.6pp 9th 53% below peers
New Orleans, LA 8.0% 14th -1.1pp 10th 5% below peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 8.4% 16th -1.1pp 11th on par with peers
Chandler, AZ 6.6% 6th -0.7pp 12th 22% below peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 3.4% 1st -0.4pp 13th 59% below peers
Tampa, FL 10.5% 22nd -1.1pp 14th 25% above peers
Orlando, FL 13.8% 28th -1.4pp 15th 63% above peers
Pittsburgh, PA 4.8% 3rd -0.4pp 16th 44% below peers
Riverside, CA 8.9% 18th -0.5pp 17th 5% above peers
Plano, TX 10.6% 23rd -0.5pp 18th 26% above peers
Bakersfield, CA 7.4% 11th -0.0pp 19th 13% below peers
Wichita, KS 12.2% 26th +0.2pp 20th 45% above peers
Stockton, CA 6.9% 9th +0.1pp 21st 18% below peers
Saint Paul, MN 6.6% 7th +0.1pp 22nd 22% below peers
Henderson, NV 6.7% 8th +0.2pp 23rd 21% below peers
Corpus Christi, TX 17.5% 29th +0.5pp 24th 107% above peers
Arlington, TX 18.9% 30th +0.7pp 25th 124% above peers
Cleveland, OH 8.0% 13th +0.4pp 26th 6% below peers
Lexington, KY 7.1% 10th +0.4pp 27th 16% below peers
Cincinnati, OH 7.7% 12th +0.5pp 28th 9% below peers
Newark, NJ 19.2% 31st +2.4pp 29th 128% above peers
Gilbert, AZ 6.3% 5th +1.0pp 30th 26% below peers
Aurora, CO 13.6% 27th +2.3pp 31st 61% above peers
Where is this changing? 132 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthPeople without health insurance
Loading tract map…
73 of 132 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 1 has too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Toledo, OH down 1.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 95% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Portland, OR down 1.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 94% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Chesapeake, VA down 1.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 93% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.2pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Health

Adult obesity

▼ Lower is better Level only
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Adult obesity is about three-quarters of the peer median.

24.4%
20202022
Compare all 30 similar-size cities best first
Place Latest Today's rank History Latest vs. peers
Hawaii ref 25.6%
United States ref 33.4%
Irvine, CA 20.3% 1st 40% below peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 24.4% 2nd 28% below peers
Anaheim, CA 28.2% 3rd 17% below peers
Plano, TX 28.2% 4th 17% below peers
Aurora, CO 28.3% 5th 16% below peers
Jersey City, NJ 29.1% 6th 14% below peers
Gilbert, AZ 29.8% 7th 12% below peers
Henderson, NV 30.1% 8th 11% below peers
Chandler, AZ 30.2% 9th 11% below peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 30.4% 10th 10% below peers
Santa Ana, CA 30.8% 11th 9% below peers
Tampa, FL 32.3% 12th 4% below peers
Saint Paul, MN 33.2% 13th 2% below peers
Orlando, FL 33.6% 14th 1% below peers
Pittsburgh, PA 33.8% 15th on par with peers
Lincoln, NE 33.8% 16th on par with peers
Durham, NC 33.9% 17th on par with peers
Lexington, KY 34.5% 18th 2% above peers
Wichita, KS 34.7% 19th 3% above peers
Bakersfield, CA 34.7% 20th 3% above peers
Riverside, CA 35.1% 21st 4% above peers
Newark, NJ 35.1% 22nd 4% above peers
Greensboro, NC 35.1% 23rd 4% above peers
Stockton, CA 35.3% 24th 4% above peers
New Orleans, LA 37.2% 25th 10% above peers
St. Louis, MO 37.4% 26th 11% above peers
Arlington, TX 39.2% 27th 16% above peers
Cincinnati, OH 41.8% 28th 24% above peers
Corpus Christi, TX 42.7% 29th 26% above peers
Cleveland, OH 44.9% 30th 33% above peers
CDC PLACES through 2022 modeled tract map about this metric
Health

Children without health insurance

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Child uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (2.4% then, 2.2% now; margin ±0.6pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 11 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: child uninsured fell 1.0 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (3.2% to 2.2%).
2.2%
20122024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Hawaii ref 3.0% +0.8pp
United States ref 5.5% +0.4pp
Lexington, KY 3.0% 4th -1.3pp 1st 42% below peers
Jersey City, NJ 3.9% 10th -1.6pp 2nd 25% below peers
Lincoln, NE 3.8% 8th -1.4pp 3rd 27% below peers
Irvine, CA 2.2% 1st -0.7pp 4th 57% below peers
Greensboro, NC 3.5% 7th -1.0pp 5th 32% below peers
Anaheim, CA 3.5% 6th -0.8pp 6th 32% below peers
Chandler, AZ 5.4% 18th -0.9pp 7th 4% above peers
Corpus Christi, TX 8.1% 26th -1.1pp 8th 57% above peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 7.3% 24th -0.8pp 9th 43% above peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 2.2% 2nd -0.2pp 10th 56% below peers
St. Louis, MO 4.9% 14th -0.2pp 11th 5% below peers
Wichita, KS 6.5% 23rd -0.1pp 12th 26% above peers
Saint Paul, MN 4.4% 12th -0.0pp 13th 15% below peers
Pittsburgh, PA 3.5% 5th +0.2pp 14th 33% below peers
Riverside, CA 3.9% 11th +0.3pp 15th 25% below peers
Durham, NC 8.0% 25th +0.6pp 16th 55% above peers
Plano, TX 9.1% 28th +0.8pp 17th 77% above peers
Gilbert, AZ 5.1% 15th +0.4pp 18th on par with peers
Santa Ana, CA 5.2% 17th +0.5pp 19th 2% above peers
Stockton, CA 2.9% 3rd +0.3pp 20th 43% below peers
Tampa, FL 6.2% 21st +0.8pp 21st 21% above peers
Arlington, TX 13.1% 31st +1.8pp 22nd 154% above peers
Henderson, NV 6.5% 22nd +1.0pp 23rd 26% above peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 5.1% 16th +0.8pp 24th on par with peers
Aurora, CO 8.9% 27th +1.8pp 25th 73% above peers
Orlando, FL 9.7% 29th +2.1pp 26th 88% above peers
Cincinnati, OH 5.8% 20th +1.4pp 27th 14% above peers
Bakersfield, CA 3.8% 9th +1.0pp 28th 26% below peers
Newark, NJ 11.3% 30th +3.2pp 29th 120% above peers
Cleveland, OH 4.4% 13th +1.3pp 30th 14% below peers
New Orleans, LA 5.4% 19th +1.9pp 31st 4% above peers
Where is this changing? 132 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthChildren without health insurance
Loading tract map…
75 of 132 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

2
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Toledo, OH down 1.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Portland, OR down 0.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B27001) through 2024 ±0.4pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Health data →
Education
Education

Adults with a bachelor's degree or higher

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

College attainment rose 4.3 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 37.2% to 41.5% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.1pp). 27 of the 29 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started mid-pack and has reached a genuinely better level; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 27 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: college attainment rose 6.3 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (35.2% to 41.5%).
41.5%
20102024
Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Hawaii ref 36.1% +3.2pp
United States ref 35.7% +3.5pp
Newark, NJ 19.7% 29th +4.5pp 1st 52% below peers
Cleveland, OH 22.4% 27th +4.9pp 2nd 46% below peers
Santa Ana, CA 18.3% 30th +3.3pp 3rd 56% below peers
Tampa, FL 45.7% 9th +7.1pp 4th 10% above peers
Anaheim, CA 29.7% 23rd +4.2pp 5th 28% below peers
Durham, NC 57.3% 3rd +7.7pp 6th 38% above peers
Jersey City, NJ 54.8% 4th +7.2pp 7th 32% above peers
St. Louis, MO 41.1% 16th +4.8pp 8th 1% below peers
Aurora, CO 33.6% 20th +3.9pp 9th 19% below peers
New Orleans, LA 42.4% 12th +4.8pp 10th 2% above peers
Cincinnati, OH 41.8% 13th +4.7pp 11th 1% above peers
Henderson, NV 37.4% 19th +4.0pp 12th 10% below peers
Riverside, CA 25.7% 24th +2.7pp 13th 38% below peers
Orlando, FL 42.5% 11th +4.5pp 14th 3% above peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 41.5% 15th +4.3pp 15th on par with peers
Lexington, KY 48.3% 6th +4.6pp 16th 16% above peers
Corpus Christi, TX 24.4% 25th +2.3pp 17th 41% below peers
Pittsburgh, PA 49.1% 5th +4.5pp 18th 18% above peers
Stockton, CA 20.0% 28th +1.7pp 19th 52% below peers
Gilbert, AZ 48.2% 7th +3.8pp 20th 16% above peers
Bakersfield, CA 23.6% 26th +1.7pp 21st 43% below peers
Arlington, TX 32.6% 21st +2.3pp 22nd 21% below peers
Saint Paul, MN 43.8% 10th +3.0pp 23rd 5% above peers
Greensboro, NC 41.0% 17th +2.8pp 24th 1% below peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 38.6% 18th +2.5pp 25th 7% below peers
Chandler, AZ 47.8% 8th +3.0pp 26th 15% above peers
Plano, TX 60.5% 2nd +3.3pp 27th 46% above peers
Lincoln, NE 41.8% 14th +2.2pp 28th 1% above peers
Wichita, KS 31.1% 22nd +1.0pp 29th 25% below peers
Irvine, CA 70.6% 1st +1.8pp 30th 70% above peers
Where is this changing? 132 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationAdults with a bachelor's degree or higher
Loading tract map…
73 of 132 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 1 has too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • St. Petersburg, FL up 6.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 94% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Winston-Salem, NC up 5.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 80% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Long Beach, CA up 4.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 79% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.9pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Education

Children ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool

▲ Higher is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Preschool enrollment fell 14.2 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 59.0% to 44.8% - more than the combined survey margin (±6.0pp). That reverses the previous span, which went up between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys. 5 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 7 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: preschool enrollment fell 5.5 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (50.4% to 44.8%).
44.8%
20112024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Hawaii ref 43.7% -4.4pp
United States ref 45.5%
Corpus Christi, TX 47.8% 12th +8.0pp 1st 7% above peers
Anaheim, CA 51.3% 9th +7.1pp 2nd 14% above peers
Aurora, CO 44.2% 17th +6.0pp 3rd 2% below peers
Riverside, CA 41.0% 21st +4.8pp 4th 8% below peers
Henderson, NV 43.8% 18th +3.5pp 5th 2% below peers
Tampa, FL 58.2% 6th +4.6pp 6th 30% above peers
Arlington, TX 39.7% 24th +2.0pp 7th 11% below peers
St. Louis, MO 53.8% 8th +1.0pp 8th 20% above peers
Chandler, AZ 46.9% 15th +0.8pp 9th 5% above peers
Cincinnati, OH 47.6% 14th -0.2pp 10th 6% above peers
Pittsburgh, PA 50.9% 10th -0.4pp 11th 14% above peers
New Orleans, LA 61.5% 3rd -2.4pp 12th 37% above peers
Wichita, KS 36.5% 27th -1.5pp 13th 19% below peers
Plano, TX 47.7% 13th -2.1pp 14th 6% above peers
Jersey City, NJ 73.2% 1st -3.6pp 15th 63% above peers
Saint Paul, MN 36.2% 28th -1.8pp 16th 19% below peers
Santa Ana, CA 43.0% 19th -2.8pp 17th 4% below peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 34.2% 29th -2.4pp 18th 24% below peers
Stockton, CA 39.5% 25th -2.8pp 19th 12% below peers
Newark, NJ 67.5% 2nd -5.8pp 20th 51% above peers
Lincoln, NE 41.4% 20th -3.9pp 21st 8% below peers
Orlando, FL 55.1% 7th -6.2pp 22nd 23% above peers
Gilbert, AZ 50.1% 11th -6.6pp 23rd 12% above peers
Greensboro, NC 37.0% 26th -4.9pp 24th 18% below peers
Bakersfield, CA 29.3% 31st -5.1pp 25th 35% below peers
Lexington, KY 41.0% 22nd -7.3pp 26th 9% below peers
Durham, NC 39.8% 23rd -7.2pp 27th 11% below peers
Irvine, CA 59.6% 4th -12.5pp 28th 33% above peers
Cleveland, OH 33.7% 30th -8.7pp 29th 25% below peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 58.5% 5th -15.5pp 30th 31% above peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 44.8% 16th -14.2pp 31st on par with peers
Where is this changing? 132 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationChildren ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool
Loading tract map…
71 of 132 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 13 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

1
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • St. Petersburg, FL up 11.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±5.2pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Education

Teens not in school and not working

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Disconnected youth changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (5.2% then, 6.5% now; margin ±1.8pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 4 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: disconnected youth fell 0.5 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (7.0% to 6.5%).
6.5%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Hawaii ref 8.0% +0.1pp
United States ref 6.9% +0.3pp
Orlando, FL 4.3% 6th -4.4pp 1st 36% below peers
Chandler, AZ 4.3% 5th -3.9pp 2nd 36% below peers
St. Louis, MO 6.7% 15th -3.3pp 3rd on par with peers
Irvine, CA 1.4% 1st -0.6pp 4th 80% below peers
Durham, NC 4.5% 7th -1.2pp 5th 32% below peers
Greensboro, NC 5.1% 8th -1.3pp 6th 24% below peers
Newark, NJ 9.8% 26th -1.8pp 7th 47% above peers
Arlington, TX 6.3% 10th -1.0pp 8th 6% below peers
Cincinnati, OH 7.6% 19th -0.7pp 9th 13% above peers
New Orleans, LA 8.1% 21st -0.4pp 10th 21% above peers
Henderson, NV 6.4% 12th -0.2pp 11th 4% below peers
Jersey City, NJ 7.9% 20th -0.2pp 12th 19% above peers
Cleveland, OH 10.4% 29th -0.2pp 13th 55% above peers
Aurora, CO 8.1% 22nd -0.1pp 14th 21% above peers
Tampa, FL 5.2% 9th +0.0pp 15th 21% below peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 8.4% 24th +0.1pp 16th 26% above peers
Pittsburgh, PA 3.7% 3rd +0.2pp 17th 44% below peers
Riverside, CA 6.3% 11th +0.3pp 18th 6% below peers
Stockton, CA 10.1% 28th +1.0pp 19th 51% above peers
Lexington, KY 4.2% 4th +0.5pp 20th 37% below peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 12.1% 30th +1.5pp 21st 81% above peers
Saint Paul, MN 6.8% 17th +0.9pp 22nd 2% above peers
Wichita, KS 9.0% 25th +1.7pp 23rd 35% above peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 6.5% 14th +1.3pp 24th 2% below peers
Bakersfield, CA 10.0% 27th +2.0pp 25th 49% above peers
Lincoln, NE 3.5% 2nd +0.7pp 26th 48% below peers
Corpus Christi, TX 13.2% 31st +2.9pp 27th 97% above peers
Anaheim, CA 8.2% 23rd +2.1pp 28th 22% above peers
Gilbert, AZ 6.7% 16th +1.9pp 29th on par with peers
Plano, TX 7.1% 18th +2.1pp 30th 6% above peers
Santa Ana, CA 6.5% 13th +2.1pp 31st 3% below peers
Where is this changing? 132 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationTeens not in school and not working
Loading tract map…
72 of 132 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 7 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B14005) through 2024 ±1.4pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Education data →
Demographics
Demographics

Population

No better direction Falling
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Population fell about 1% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 348,985 to 345,482 - more than the combined survey margin (±129). That reverses the previous span, which went up between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys. 6 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.

Falling beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 26 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: population held roughly steady from 2014 to 2024.
345,482
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Gilbert, AZ 280,262 30th +15% 1st 12% below peers
Irvine, CA 311,690 18th +14% 2nd 2% below peers
Orlando, FL 319,758 13th +14% 3rd 1% above peers
Jersey City, NJ 294,078 25th +12% 4th 7% below peers
Chandler, AZ 280,136 31st +11% 5th 12% below peers
Henderson, NV 332,141 10th +11% 6th 5% above peers
Newark, NJ 310,178 20th +10% 7th 2% below peers
Bakersfield, CA 411,986 1st +9% 8th 30% above peers
Durham, NC 291,467 26th +8% 9th 8% below peers
Aurora, CO 394,432 5th +7% 10th 24% above peers
Stockton, CA 322,326 12th +4% 11th 2% above peers
Lincoln, NE 294,856 24th +4% 12th 7% below peers
Tampa, FL 401,618 2nd +4% 13th 27% above peers
Greensboro, NC 301,198 23rd +3% 14th 5% below peers
Cincinnati, OH 311,224 19th +3% 15th 2% below peers
Wichita, KS 397,945 3rd +2% 16th 25% above peers
Plano, TX 290,594 27th +1% 17th 8% below peers
Lexington, KY 323,725 11th +1% 18th 2% above peers
Saint Paul, MN 307,284 21st +1% 19th 3% below peers
Pittsburgh, PA 304,759 22nd +1% 20th 4% below peers
Arlington, TX 397,742 4th +1% 21st 25% above peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 345,482 8th -1% 22nd 9% above peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 288,976 28th -2% 23rd 9% below peers
Anaheim, CA 344,521 9th -2% 24th 9% above peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 317,995 15th -2% 25th on par with peers
Riverside, CA 319,069 14th -2% 26th 1% above peers
Corpus Christi, TX 317,419 16th -3% 27th on par with peers
New Orleans, LA 371,853 6th -5% 28th 17% above peers
Cleveland, OH 366,097 7th -5% 29th 15% above peers
Santa Ana, CA 312,534 17th -6% 30th 2% below peers
St. Louis, MO 288,512 29th -6% 31st 9% below peers
Where is this changing? 132 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsPopulation
Loading tract map…
73 of 132 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±70 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Children's share of the population

No better direction Falling
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Children fell 0.7 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 17.1% to 16.5% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.5pp). 21 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.

Falling beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 21 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: children fell 0.8 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (17.2% to 16.5%).
16.5%
20172024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Hawaii ref 20.8% -0.7pp
United States ref 21.6% -0.7pp
Orlando, FL 21.4% 18th +0.3pp 1st 2% below peers
Newark, NJ 24.8% 4th +0.2pp 2nd 14% above peers
Lexington, KY 21.0% 20th +0.1pp 3rd 3% below peers
Greensboro, NC 21.7% 16th -0.1pp 4th on par with peers
Irvine, CA 21.7% 17th -0.4pp 5th on par with peers
New Orleans, LA 19.7% 25th -0.4pp 6th 9% below peers
Bakersfield, CA 29.2% 1st -0.7pp 7th 34% above peers
Henderson, NV 20.8% 22nd -0.5pp 8th 4% below peers
Lincoln, NE 21.9% 15th -0.7pp 9th 1% above peers
Arlington, TX 24.8% 5th -0.8pp 10th 14% above peers
Pittsburgh, PA 14.6% 31st -0.5pp 11th 33% below peers
Riverside, CA 23.1% 11th -0.8pp 12th 6% above peers
Stockton, CA 26.7% 3rd -1.0pp 13th 23% above peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 16.5% 29th -0.7pp 14th 24% below peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 23.5% 8th -1.0pp 15th 8% above peers
Jersey City, NJ 19.7% 26th -0.9pp 16th 9% below peers
Wichita, KS 24.1% 6th -1.2pp 17th 11% above peers
Corpus Christi, TX 23.4% 10th -1.2pp 18th 8% above peers
Cleveland, OH 21.0% 19th -1.1pp 19th 3% below peers
St. Louis, MO 18.3% 28th -1.1pp 20th 16% below peers
Cincinnati, OH 20.7% 23rd -1.3pp 21st 5% below peers
Saint Paul, MN 23.5% 9th -1.5pp 22nd 8% above peers
Aurora, CO 23.9% 7th -1.5pp 23rd 10% above peers
Gilbert, AZ 28.1% 2nd -1.8pp 24th 30% above peers
Plano, TX 20.9% 21st -1.6pp 25th 4% below peers
Durham, NC 20.1% 24th -1.6pp 26th 8% below peers
Anaheim, CA 22.2% 14th -1.8pp 27th 2% above peers
Chandler, AZ 22.8% 13th -2.4pp 28th 5% above peers
Tampa, FL 19.4% 27th -2.1pp 29th 11% below peers
Santa Ana, CA 22.9% 12th -4.0pp 30th 5% above peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 15.3% 30th -2.9pp 31st 30% below peers
Where is this changing? 132 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren's share of the population
Loading tract map…
73 of 132 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 1 has too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.3pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Children in single-parent families

No better direction Rising
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Single-parent rose 3.9 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 23.7% to 27.7% - more than the combined survey margin (±3.1pp). 5 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.

Rising beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 12 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: single-parent rose 1.9 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (25.7% to 27.7%).
27.7%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Hawaii ref 27.4% +3.1pp
United States ref 29.9% -0.2pp
Chandler, AZ 27.9% 26th +5.1pp 1st 19% below peers
Irvine, CA 17.7% 31st +3.2pp 2nd 49% below peers
Gilbert, AZ 19.9% 29th +3.5pp 3rd 43% below peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 27.7% 27th +3.9pp 4th 20% below peers
Aurora, CO 34.0% 17th +4.7pp 5th 2% below peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 31.6% 21st +4.2pp 6th 9% below peers
Henderson, NV 28.8% 25th +2.4pp 7th 17% below peers
Anaheim, CA 29.7% 23rd +2.3pp 8th 14% below peers
Stockton, CA 41.2% 9th +3.1pp 9th 19% above peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 68.2% 2nd +3.3pp 10th 97% above peers
Bakersfield, CA 35.5% 15th +1.4pp 11th 3% above peers
Plano, TX 19.4% 30th +0.7pp 12th 44% below peers
Santa Ana, CA 29.5% 24th +0.9pp 13th 15% below peers
Saint Paul, MN 39.6% 11th +1.2pp 14th 14% above peers
Lincoln, NE 26.7% 28th +0.8pp 15th 23% below peers
Cleveland, OH 71.9% 1st +1.9pp 16th 108% above peers
Corpus Christi, TX 37.0% 14th +0.4pp 17th 7% above peers
Newark, NJ 58.1% 3rd -0.2pp 18th 68% above peers
Riverside, CA 30.1% 22nd -0.6pp 19th 13% below peers
Greensboro, NC 42.9% 7th -1.1pp 20th 24% above peers
Lexington, KY 31.7% 19th -1.2pp 21st 8% below peers
Wichita, KS 34.6% 16th -1.6pp 22nd on par with peers
Pittsburgh, PA 42.6% 8th -2.1pp 23rd 23% above peers
Tampa, FL 40.1% 10th -2.4pp 24th 16% above peers
New Orleans, LA 53.7% 5th -4.0pp 25th 55% above peers
St. Louis, MO 52.2% 6th -4.0pp 26th 51% above peers
Arlington, TX 32.6% 18th -3.0pp 27th 6% below peers
Cincinnati, OH 56.2% 4th -6.5pp 28th 62% above peers
Orlando, FL 38.9% 12th -5.0pp 29th 12% above peers
Jersey City, NJ 31.6% 20th -4.9pp 30th 9% below peers
Durham, NC 37.4% 13th -5.9pp 31st 8% above peers
Where is this changing? 132 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren in single-parent families
Loading tract map…
75 of 132 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 3 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B09002) through 2024 ±2.3pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Young children with all parents in the labor force

No better direction Rising
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Working parents rose 6.0 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 62.2% to 68.2% - more than the combined survey margin (±5.6pp). 4 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.

Rising beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 6 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: working parents rose 5.0 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (63.2% to 68.2%).
68.2%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Hawaii ref 68.4% +4.7pp
United States ref 68.1% +1.9pp
Gilbert, AZ 70.7% 9th +15.2pp 1st 4% above peers
Irvine, CA 61.7% 28th +6.5pp 2nd 9% below peers
Urban Honolulu, HI 68.2% 15th +6.0pp 3rd on par with peers
Tampa, FL 74.3% 3rd +6.3pp 4th 9% above peers
Riverside, CA 67.2% 18th +5.6pp 5th 1% below peers
Anaheim, CA 68.2% 16th +4.6pp 6th on par with peers
Jersey City, NJ 65.3% 21st +4.2pp 7th 4% below peers
Chandler, AZ 67.6% 17th +4.2pp 8th 1% below peers
Stockton, CA 63.5% 24th +3.8pp 9th 7% below peers
Plano, TX 59.9% 31st +3.3pp 10th 12% below peers
Anchorage municipality, AK 68.5% 14th +3.2pp 11th 1% above peers
Santa Ana, CA 62.8% 26th +2.4pp 12th 8% below peers
Arlington, TX 67.2% 19th +1.8pp 13th 1% below peers
San Juan zona urbana, PR 65.5% 20th +1.5pp 14th 4% below peers
Newark, NJ 72.3% 6th +1.5pp 15th 6% above peers
Wichita, KS 70.3% 10th +1.2pp 16th 3% above peers
Lexington, KY 74.2% 4th +1.1pp 17th 9% above peers
Durham, NC 74.5% 2nd -0.5pp 18th 9% above peers
Pittsburgh, PA 69.1% 13th -0.7pp 19th 1% above peers
Greensboro, NC 69.6% 12th -0.8pp 20th 2% above peers
Corpus Christi, TX 60.9% 30th -0.8pp 21st 11% below peers
New Orleans, LA 70.2% 11th -1.0pp 22nd 3% above peers
Cleveland, OH 71.9% 7th -1.7pp 23rd 6% above peers
Orlando, FL 71.5% 8th -1.8pp 24th 5% above peers
Lincoln, NE 73.5% 5th -1.9pp 25th 8% above peers
Aurora, CO 63.5% 25th -1.9pp 26th 7% below peers
St. Louis, MO 74.5% 1st -2.2pp 27th 9% above peers
Bakersfield, CA 62.4% 27th -1.9pp 28th 8% below peers
Henderson, NV 61.3% 29th -3.4pp 29th 10% below peers
Saint Paul, MN 64.9% 22nd -6.9pp 30th 5% below peers
Cincinnati, OH 64.5% 23rd -7.3pp 31st 5% below peers
Where is this changing? 132 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsYoung children with all parents in the labor force
Loading tract map…
75 of 132 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 4 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B23008) through 2024 ±4.5pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Demographics data →