The most recent 12 months moved against the better direction, whatever the longer window shows. The checks below judge the multi-year window. Anaheim is also worsening faster than most of the selected peers.
Violent crime rose about 1% over the 12 months ending July 2026, faster than 79% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 456 (Apr 26) | -9.3% | |||
| Greensboro, NC | 578 (Jul 26) | -29.9% | 1st | ||
| Newark, NJ | 417 (Jul 26) | -21.1% | 2nd | ||
| Arlington, TX | 360 (Jul 26) | -18.9% | 3rd | ||
| Cleveland, OH | 1,357 (Jun 26) | -17.3% | 4th | ||
| Lexington, KY | 304 (Apr 26) | -12.9% | 5th | ||
| Jersey City, NJ | 470 (Jul 26) | -11.3% | 6th | ||
| Henderson, NV | 211 (Jul 26) | -11.3% | 7th | ||
| Corpus Christi, TX | 716 (Jun 26) | -11.2% | 8th | ||
| Stockton, CA | 978 (Jul 26) | -9.3% | 9th | ||
| Urban Honolulu, HI | 188 (Jul 26) | -7.5% | 10th | ||
| Saint Paul, MN | 491 (Jul 26) | -4.7% | 11th | ||
| Durham, NC | 535 (Jul 26) | -4.7% | 12th | ||
| St. Louis, MO | 1,217 (Jul 26) | -4.4% | 13th | ||
| Cincinnati, OH | 833 (Apr 26) | -2.6% | 14th | ||
| Pittsburgh, PA | 504 (Jun 26) | -1.9% | 15th | ||
| Chandler, AZ | 118 (Jul 26) | -1.5% | 16th | ||
| Irvine, CA | 77 (Jul 26) | -1.2% | 17th | ||
| Gilbert, AZ | 123 (Jul 26) | -0.8% | 18th | ||
| Madison, WI | 227 (Jul 26) | +0.2% | 19th | ||
| Anaheim, CA | 548 (Jul 26) | +0.6% | 20th | ||
| Plano, TX | 145 (Jul 26) | +1.0% | 21st | ||
| Lincoln, NE | 404 (Jul 26) | +1.9% | 22nd | ||
| Reno, NV | 512 (May 26) | +6.8% | 23rd | ||
| Riverside, CA | 586 (Jul 26) | +7.6% | 24th | ||
| North Las Vegas, NV | 367 (Jun 26) | +15.1% | 25th |
This badge answers one question: can Anaheim's own trend be trusted as a real improvement? The trend passed all three checks, so yes. The most recent 12 months agree with the multi-year trend.
Property crime fell about 13% over the 12 months ending July 2026, faster than 54% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 1,987 (Apr 26) | -12.2% | |||
| Irvine, CA | 951 (Jul 26) | -28.0% | 1st | ||
| Reno, NV | 1,827 (May 26) | -24.9% | 2nd | ||
| Greensboro, NC | 2,445 (Jul 26) | -22.4% | 3rd | ||
| Arlington, TX | 1,800 (Jul 26) | -18.9% | 4th | ||
| Newark, NJ | 1,531 (Jul 26) | -18.6% | 5th | ||
| Urban Honolulu, HI | 1,362 (Jul 26) | -18.2% | 6th | ||
| Cleveland, OH | 4,097 (Jun 26) | -17.2% | 7th | ||
| Chandler, AZ | 1,146 (Jul 26) | -16.1% | 8th | ||
| Plano, TX | 1,114 (Jul 26) | -15.5% | 9th | ||
| Lincoln, NE | 1,807 (Jul 26) | -13.5% | 10th | ||
| Gilbert, AZ | 843 (Jul 26) | -13.1% | 11th | ||
| Anaheim, CA | 1,706 (Jul 26) | -12.7% | 12th | ||
| Riverside, CA | 2,144 (Jul 26) | -12.3% | 13th | ||
| Jersey City, NJ | 1,697 (Jul 26) | -12.2% | 14th | ||
| Lexington, KY | 2,110 (Jul 26) | -11.1% | 15th | ||
| Corpus Christi, TX | 2,573 (Jun 26) | -10.5% | 16th | ||
| Cincinnati, OH | 3,646 (Jul 26) | -7.8% | 17th | ||
| Pittsburgh, PA | 2,847 (Jun 26) | -7.7% | 18th | ||
| Stockton, CA | 2,241 (Jul 26) | -7.4% | 19th | ||
| Durham, NC | 3,535 (Jul 26) | -6.6% | 20th | ||
| North Las Vegas, NV | 1,593 (Jun 26) | -6.1% | 21st | ||
| St. Louis, MO | 4,964 (Jul 26) | -5.3% | 22nd | ||
| Henderson, NV | 1,444 (Jul 26) | -5.0% | 23rd | ||
| Madison, WI | 1,956 (Jul 26) | -1.3% | 24th | ||
| Saint Paul, MN | 2,766 (Jul 26) | +1.1% | 25th |
This badge answers one question: can Anaheim's own trend be trusted as a real improvement? The trend passed all three checks, so yes. The most recent 12 months agree with the multi-year trend.
Homicides fell about 10% over the 12 months ending July 2026, slower than 60% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 6 (Apr 26) | -17.8% | |||
| Henderson, NV | 0 (Jul 26) | -100.0% | 1st | ||
| Irvine, CA | 0 (Jul 26) | -100.0% | 2nd | ||
| North Las Vegas, NV | 0 (Jun 26) | -95.8% | 3rd | ||
| Reno, NV | 0 (May 26) | -94.4% | 4th | ||
| Plano, TX | 0 (Jul 26) | -66.5% | 5th | ||
| Arlington, TX | 2 (Jul 26) | -57.8% | 6th | ||
| Corpus Christi, TX | 3 (Jun 26) | -52.4% | 7th | ||
| Lincoln, NE | 1 (Jul 26) | -40.1% | 8th | ||
| Greensboro, NC | 8 (Jul 26) | -40.0% | 9th | ||
| Newark, NJ | 6 (Jul 26) | -38.7% | 10th | ||
| Cincinnati, OH | 15 (Jul 26) | -31.3% | 11th | ||
| Durham, NC | 9 (Jul 26) | -22.2% | 12th | ||
| Stockton, CA | 11 (Jul 26) | -14.3% | 13th | ||
| Madison, WI | 2 (Jul 26) | -14.3% | 14th | ||
| Lexington, KY | 6 (Apr 26) | -12.6% | 15th | ||
| Anaheim, CA | 3 (Jul 26) | -9.9% | 16th | ||
| Jersey City, NJ | 3 (Jul 26) | -9.1% | 17th | ||
| New Orleans, LA | 28 (Jul 26) | -1.9% | 18th | ||
| Cleveland, OH | 28 (Jun 26) | +4.1% | 19th | ||
| St. Louis, MO | 51 (Jul 26) | +5.2% | 20th | ||
| Urban Honolulu, HI | 2 (Jul 26) | +5.5% | 21st | ||
| Saint Paul, MN | 7 (Jul 26) | +11.1% | 22nd | ||
| Pittsburgh, PA | 11 (Jun 26) | +29.6% | 23rd | ||
| Chandler, AZ | 1 (Jul 26) | +50.5% | 24th | ||
| Riverside, CA | 5 (Jul 26) | +87.1% | 25th | ||
| Gilbert, AZ | 3 (Jul 26) | +899.7% | 26th |
This badge answers one question: can Anaheim's own trend be trusted as a real improvement? The trend passed all three checks, so yes. The most recent 12 months agree with the multi-year trend.
Vehicle theft fell about 15% over the 12 months ending July 2026, slower than 62% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 303 (Apr 26) | -22.2% | |||
| Plano, TX | 63 (Jul 26) | -42.6% | 1st | ||
| Arlington, TX | 176 (Jul 26) | -40.8% | 2nd | ||
| Cincinnati, OH | 614 (Jul 26) | -32.3% | 3rd | ||
| North Las Vegas, NV | 431 (Jun 26) | -30.6% | 4th | ||
| Greensboro, NC | 389 (Jul 26) | -30.1% | 5th | ||
| Gilbert, AZ | 44 (Jul 26) | -29.2% | 6th | ||
| Henderson, NV | 210 (Jul 26) | -29.2% | 7th | ||
| Reno, NV | 238 (May 26) | -27.7% | 8th | ||
| Riverside, CA | 292 (Jul 26) | -26.5% | 9th | ||
| Stockton, CA | 368 (Jul 26) | -25.5% | 10th | ||
| Durham, NC | 451 (Jul 26) | -23.9% | 11th | ||
| Newark, NJ | 597 (Jul 26) | -20.7% | 12th | ||
| Cleveland, OH | 887 (Jun 26) | -18.8% | 13th | ||
| Lincoln, NE | 203 (Jul 26) | -18.7% | 14th | ||
| Irvine, CA | 50 (Jul 26) | -16.7% | 15th | ||
| Anaheim, CA | 252 (Jul 26) | -14.9% | 16th | ||
| Chandler, AZ | 74 (Jul 26) | -14.1% | 17th | ||
| Lexington, KY | 249 (Jul 26) | -9.2% | 18th | ||
| Urban Honolulu, HI | 238 (Jul 26) | -7.9% | 19th | ||
| Saint Paul, MN | 392 (Jul 26) | -7.1% | 20th | ||
| Pittsburgh, PA | 379 (Jun 26) | -6.7% | 21st | ||
| St. Louis, MO | 1,174 (Jul 26) | -4.1% | 22nd | ||
| Jersey City, NJ | 272 (Jul 26) | -2.6% | 23rd | ||
| Corpus Christi, TX | 317 (Jun 26) | +1.9% | 24th | ||
| Madison, WI | 120 (Jul 26) | +12.0% | 25th |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Household income rose about 33% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from $71,763 to $95,227 (each survey's own dollars, not adjusted for inflation) - more than the combined survey margin (±$3,405).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | $99,122 | +32% | |||||
| United States ref | $80,734 | +28% | |||||
| Newark, NJ | $52,060 | 29th | +48% | 1st | 33% below peers | ||
| Stockton, CA | $79,907 | 14th | +46% | 2nd | 2% above peers | ||
| Santa Ana, CA | $93,999 | 8th | +42% | 3rd | 20% above peers | ||
| Orlando, FL | $72,336 | 19th | +40% | 4th | 7% below peers | ||
| Durham, NC | $81,619 | 12th | +39% | 5th | 5% above peers | ||
| Jersey City, NJ | $97,710 | 6th | +38% | 6th | 25% above peers | ||
| Reno, NV | $80,760 | 13th | +37% | 7th | 3% above peers | ||
| New Orleans, LA | $56,631 | 26th | +36% | 8th | 27% below peers | ||
| Pittsburgh, PA | $65,742 | 23rd | +35% | 9th | 16% below peers | ||
| North Las Vegas, NV | $79,542 | 15th | +33% | 10th | 2% above peers | ||
| Anaheim, CA | $95,227 | 7th | +33% | 11th | 22% above peers | ||
| Cleveland, OH | $40,801 | 30th | +32% | 12th | 48% below peers | ||
| Riverside, CA | $91,045 | 9th | +32% | 13th | 17% above peers | ||
| Chandler, AZ | $108,095 | 4th | +30% | 14th | 38% above peers | ||
| Cincinnati, OH | $52,909 | 28th | +30% | 15th | 32% below peers | ||
| Irvine, CA | $136,719 | 1st | +30% | 16th | 75% above peers | ||
| St. Louis, MO | $56,160 | 27th | +28% | 17th | 28% below peers | ||
| Saint Paul, MN | $73,394 | 18th | +27% | 18th | 6% below peers | ||
| San Juan zona urbana, PR | $28,562 | 31st | +27% | 19th | 63% below peers | ||
| Gilbert, AZ | $122,551 | 2nd | +27% | 20th | 57% above peers | ||
| Greensboro, NC | $61,515 | 25th | +26% | 21st | 21% below peers | ||
| Lincoln, NE | $71,867 | 20th | +24% | 22nd | 8% below peers | ||
| Arlington, TX | $75,171 | 17th | +24% | 23rd | 4% below peers | ||
| Wichita, KS | $64,620 | 24th | +23% | 24th | 17% below peers | ||
| Anchorage municipality, AK | $103,284 | 5th | +22% | 25th | 32% above peers | ||
| Henderson, NV | $90,138 | 10th | +22% | 26th | 15% above peers | ||
| Lexington, KY | $69,479 | 21st | +21% | 27th | 11% below peers | ||
| Urban Honolulu, HI | $86,504 | 11th | +21% | 28th | 11% above peers | ||
| Corpus Christi, TX | $67,394 | 22nd | +20% | 29th | 14% below peers | ||
| Madison, WI | $78,050 | 16th | +19% | 30th | on par with peers | ||
| Plano, TX | $112,253 | 3rd | +17% | 31st | 44% above peers |
The last 12 months moved in the better direction. The multi-year trend has not (yet) passed the checks below, so no sustained-improvement claim is made.
Unemployment fell 0.2 percentage points over the 12 months ending July 2026, slower than 61% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 5.1% (Jul 26) | -0.4pp | ||||
| United States ref | 4.1% (Aug 26) | -0.2pp | ||||
| Newark, NJ | 6.9% (Jul 26) | 28th | -2.0pp | 1st | 60% above peers | |
| Cincinnati, OH | 3.9% (Jul 26) | 7th | -1.6pp | 2nd | 9% below peers | |
| Cleveland, OH | 3.8% (Jul 26) | 6th | -1.5pp | 3rd | 12% below peers | |
| Jersey City, NJ | 4.2% (Jul 26) | 10th | -1.1pp | 4th | 2% below peers | |
| St. Louis, MO | 4.4% (Jul 26) | 16th | -0.7pp | 5th | 2% above peers | |
| Greensboro, NC | 4.4% (Jul 26) | 17th | -0.6pp | 6th | 2% above peers | |
| Stockton, CA | 7.1% (Jul 26) | 29th | -0.5pp | 7th | 65% above peers | |
| Riverside, CA | 5.1% (Jul 26) | 24th | -0.5pp | 8th | 19% above peers | |
| Santa Ana, CA | 4.2% (Jul 26) | 11th | -0.5pp | 9th | 2% below peers | |
| North Las Vegas, NV | 5.6% (Jul 26) | 27th | -0.5pp | 10th | 30% above peers | |
| Reno, NV | 3.9% (Jul 26) | 8th | -0.4pp | 11th | 9% below peers | |
| New Orleans, LA | 5.1% (Jul 26) | 25th | -0.3pp | 12th | 19% above peers | |
| Durham, NC | 3.4% (Jul 26) | 4th | -0.3pp | 13th | 21% below peers | |
| Henderson, NV | 5.5% (Jul 26) | 26th | -0.3pp | 14th | 28% above peers | |
| Irvine, CA | 4.3% (Jul 26) | 12th | -0.3pp | 15th | on par with peers | |
| Lincoln, NE | 2.6% (Jul 26) | 1st | -0.3pp | 16th | 40% below peers | |
| Anchorage municipality, AK | 3.2% (Jul 26) | 3rd | -0.3pp | 17th | 26% below peers | |
| Anaheim, CA | 4.4% (Jul 26) | 18th | -0.2pp | 18th | 2% above peers | |
| Lexington, KY | 4.3% (Jul 26) | 13th | -0.1pp | 19th | on par with peers | |
| Pittsburgh, PA | 3.7% (Jul 26) | 5th | -0.1pp | 20th | 14% below peers | |
| Wichita, KS | 4.7% (Jul 26) | 21st | -0.1pp | 21st | 9% above peers | |
| Madison, WI | 2.9% (Jul 26) | 2nd | +0.2pp | 22nd | 33% below peers | |
| Corpus Christi, TX | 4.8% (Jul 26) | 23rd | +0.4pp | 23rd | 12% above peers | |
| Gilbert, AZ | 4.1% (Jul 26) | 9th | +0.5pp | 24th | 5% below peers | |
| Plano, TX | 4.5% (Jul 26) | 19th | +0.5pp | 25th | 5% above peers | |
| Arlington, TX | 4.7% (Jul 26) | 22nd | +0.5pp | 26th | 9% above peers | |
| Chandler, AZ | 4.3% (Jul 26) | 14th | +0.5pp | 27th | on par with peers | |
| Orlando, FL | 4.3% (Jul 26) | 15th | +0.6pp | 28th | on par with peers | |
| Saint Paul, MN | 4.6% (Jul 26) | 20th | +0.7pp | 29th | 7% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Poverty fell 2.4 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 14.8% to 12.4% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.2pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 12.0% | -1.3pp | |||||
| United States ref | 12.4% | ||||||
| Santa Ana, CA | 10.8% | 6th | -4.9pp | 1st | 26% below peers | ||
| Durham, NC | 11.7% | 8th | -4.2pp | 2nd | 20% below peers | ||
| Irvine, CA | 10.8% | 7th | -2.5pp | 3rd | 26% below peers | ||
| Saint Paul, MN | 15.6% | 19th | -3.3pp | 4th | 7% above peers | ||
| Anaheim, CA | 12.4% | 12th | -2.4pp | 5th | 15% below peers | ||
| Orlando, FL | 14.7% | 16th | -2.6pp | 6th | on par with peers | ||
| Newark, NJ | 23.4% | 28th | -4.0pp | 7th | 60% above peers | ||
| Stockton, CA | 15.5% | 18th | -2.4pp | 8th | 6% above peers | ||
| Riverside, CA | 12.2% | 11th | -1.7pp | 9th | 17% below peers | ||
| North Las Vegas, NV | 12.1% | 10th | -1.7pp | 10th | 17% below peers | ||
| Arlington, TX | 12.9% | 15th | -1.7pp | 11th | 12% below peers | ||
| Lexington, KY | 14.9% | 17th | -1.9pp | 12th | 2% above peers | ||
| Jersey City, NJ | 15.6% | 20th | -1.5pp | 13th | 7% above peers | ||
| Greensboro, NC | 17.0% | 23rd | -1.5pp | 14th | 16% above peers | ||
| San Juan zona urbana, PR | 38.2% | 31st | -2.9pp | 15th | 161% above peers | ||
| Cleveland, OH | 30.6% | 30th | -2.1pp | 16th | 109% above peers | ||
| Reno, NV | 12.7% | 13th | -0.8pp | 17th | 14% below peers | ||
| Lincoln, NE | 12.7% | 14th | -0.8pp | 18th | 13% below peers | ||
| St. Louis, MO | 20.6% | 26th | -1.2pp | 19th | 41% above peers | ||
| New Orleans, LA | 22.6% | 27th | -1.0pp | 20th | 54% above peers | ||
| Cincinnati, OH | 25.5% | 29th | -0.8pp | 21st | 74% above peers | ||
| Madison, WI | 16.4% | 22nd | -0.5pp | 22nd | 12% above peers | ||
| Pittsburgh, PA | 20.1% | 25th | -0.4pp | 23rd | 37% above peers | ||
| Anchorage municipality, AK | 8.9% | 4th | -0.1pp | 24th | 39% below peers | ||
| Gilbert, AZ | 5.3% | 1st | -0.0pp | 25th | 64% below peers | ||
| Plano, TX | 6.8% | 2nd | -0.0pp | 26th | 54% below peers | ||
| Wichita, KS | 15.9% | 21st | +0.0pp | 27th | 9% above peers | ||
| Chandler, AZ | 7.9% | 3rd | +0.3pp | 28th | 46% below peers | ||
| Corpus Christi, TX | 17.1% | 24th | +1.0pp | 29th | 17% above peers | ||
| Urban Honolulu, HI | 11.9% | 9th | +1.3pp | 30th | 19% below peers | ||
| Henderson, NV | 9.0% | 5th | +1.0pp | 31st | 39% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Child poverty fell 6.9 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 22.2% to 15.3% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.9pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 15.0% | -3.1pp | |||||
| United States ref | 16.1% | ||||||
| Santa Ana, CA | 14.6% | 9th | -8.8pp | 1st | 18% below peers | ||
| Durham, NC | 16.6% | 15th | -7.9pp | 2nd | 6% below peers | ||
| Anaheim, CA | 15.3% | 13th | -6.9pp | 3rd | 14% below peers | ||
| North Las Vegas, NV | 15.4% | 14th | -5.2pp | 4th | 13% below peers | ||
| Saint Paul, MN | 22.0% | 21st | -5.6pp | 5th | 24% above peers | ||
| Arlington, TX | 17.7% | 16th | -4.4pp | 6th | on par with peers | ||
| Riverside, CA | 14.8% | 10th | -3.2pp | 7th | 17% below peers | ||
| Anchorage municipality, AK | 10.8% | 6th | -2.3pp | 8th | 39% below peers | ||
| Newark, NJ | 31.2% | 27th | -6.6pp | 9th | 76% above peers | ||
| Orlando, FL | 20.6% | 18th | -3.8pp | 10th | 16% above peers | ||
| Stockton, CA | 20.8% | 19th | -3.3pp | 11th | 18% above peers | ||
| Lexington, KY | 17.9% | 17th | -2.6pp | 12th | 1% above peers | ||
| St. Louis, MO | 29.7% | 25th | -4.2pp | 13th | 67% above peers | ||
| Greensboro, NC | 23.5% | 23rd | -3.2pp | 14th | 33% above peers | ||
| Gilbert, AZ | 5.0% | 1st | -0.4pp | 15th | 72% below peers | ||
| Jersey City, NJ | 22.9% | 22nd | -1.9pp | 16th | 29% above peers | ||
| Cincinnati, OH | 36.2% | 29th | -2.7pp | 17th | 105% above peers | ||
| Cleveland, OH | 44.9% | 30th | -3.3pp | 18th | 154% above peers | ||
| Plano, TX | 7.9% | 2nd | -0.5pp | 19th | 55% below peers | ||
| Reno, NV | 14.9% | 12th | -0.8pp | 20th | 16% below peers | ||
| New Orleans, LA | 32.5% | 28th | -1.7pp | 21st | 83% above peers | ||
| Lincoln, NE | 13.6% | 7th | -0.6pp | 22nd | 24% below peers | ||
| San Juan zona urbana, PR | 58.6% | 31st | -1.9pp | 23rd | 231% above peers | ||
| Wichita, KS | 21.8% | 20th | -0.2pp | 24th | 23% above peers | ||
| Chandler, AZ | 9.9% | 4th | +0.4pp | 25th | 44% below peers | ||
| Corpus Christi, TX | 25.0% | 24th | +2.0pp | 26th | 41% above peers | ||
| Irvine, CA | 8.6% | 3rd | +0.7pp | 27th | 51% below peers | ||
| Henderson, NV | 10.7% | 5th | +1.1pp | 28th | 40% below peers | ||
| Pittsburgh, PA | 30.8% | 26th | +3.7pp | 29th | 74% above peers | ||
| Madison, WI | 13.9% | 8th | +2.1pp | 30th | 22% below peers | ||
| Urban Honolulu, HI | 14.9% | 11th | +2.8pp | 31st | 16% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Broadband rose 3.7 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 89.4% to 93.1% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.9pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 93.6% | +6.6pp | |||||
| United States ref | 91.1% | ||||||
| San Juan zona urbana, PR | 75.7% | 31st | +18.9pp | 1st | 18% below peers | ||
| Greensboro, NC | 91.0% | 21st | +17.9pp | 2nd | 1% below peers | ||
| Newark, NJ | 86.5% | 29th | +16.7pp | 3rd | 6% below peers | ||
| Cleveland, OH | 84.8% | 30th | +16.1pp | 4th | 8% below peers | ||
| New Orleans, LA | 86.6% | 28th | +13.1pp | 5th | 6% below peers | ||
| St. Louis, MO | 86.9% | 27th | +12.5pp | 6th | 6% below peers | ||
| Stockton, CA | 91.8% | 17th | +12.5pp | 7th | on par with peers | ||
| Wichita, KS | 91.6% | 19th | +10.2pp | 8th | 1% below peers | ||
| Cincinnati, OH | 89.3% | 26th | +9.6pp | 9th | 3% below peers | ||
| Pittsburgh, PA | 90.6% | 22nd | +8.8pp | 10th | 2% below peers | ||
| North Las Vegas, NV | 93.2% | 9th | +8.6pp | 11th | 1% above peers | ||
| Santa Ana, CA | 92.2% | 16th | +7.9pp | 12th | on par with peers | ||
| Corpus Christi, TX | 89.6% | 24th | +7.0pp | 13th | 3% below peers | ||
| Jersey City, NJ | 92.6% | 13th | +6.8pp | 14th | on par with peers | ||
| Durham, NC | 93.7% | 8th | +6.7pp | 15th | 2% above peers | ||
| Arlington, TX | 92.4% | 15th | +6.6pp | 16th | on par with peers | ||
| Riverside, CA | 94.4% | 7th | +6.5pp | 17th | 2% above peers | ||
| Orlando, FL | 93.2% | 10th | +6.3pp | 18th | 1% above peers | ||
| Saint Paul, MN | 91.8% | 18th | +6.2pp | 19th | on par with peers | ||
| Urban Honolulu, HI | 89.3% | 25th | +5.9pp | 20th | 3% below peers | ||
| Reno, NV | 89.7% | 23rd | +5.8pp | 21st | 3% below peers | ||
| Lexington, KY | 92.6% | 14th | +5.7pp | 22nd | on par with peers | ||
| Henderson, NV | 94.8% | 5th | +5.7pp | 23rd | 3% above peers | ||
| Lincoln, NE | 92.9% | 12th | +5.1pp | 24th | 1% above peers | ||
| Anchorage municipality, AK | 94.6% | 6th | +4.5pp | 25th | 3% above peers | ||
| Anaheim, CA | 93.1% | 11th | +3.7pp | 26th | 1% above peers | ||
| Chandler, AZ | 95.4% | 4th | +3.5pp | 27th | 3% above peers | ||
| Madison, WI | 91.5% | 20th | +2.8pp | 28th | 1% below peers | ||
| Plano, TX | 96.7% | 2nd | +2.6pp | 29th | 5% above peers | ||
| Irvine, CA | 95.8% | 3rd | +1.9pp | 30th | 4% above peers | ||
| Gilbert, AZ | 97.0% | 1st | +1.1pp | 31st | 5% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin, in the wrong direction for this metric.
Inequality rose about 3% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 0.43 to 0.45 - more than the combined survey margin (±0.01). That reverses the previous span, which went down between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys. That is movement in the wrong direction.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 0.49 | +0.000 | |||||
| United States ref | 0.48 | +0.001 | |||||
| Stockton, CA | 0.44 | 8th | -0.031 | 1st | 6% below peers | ||
| New Orleans, LA | 0.55 | 30th | -0.017 | 2nd | 18% above peers | ||
| Irvine, CA | 0.46 | 12th | -0.011 | 3rd | 2% below peers | ||
| Jersey City, NJ | 0.51 | 26th | -0.010 | 4th | 8% above peers | ||
| Orlando, FL | 0.49 | 21st | -0.008 | 5th | 4% above peers | ||
| Riverside, CA | 0.42 | 4th | -0.007 | 6th | 11% below peers | ||
| San Juan zona urbana, PR | 0.61 | 31st | -0.009 | 7th | 31% above peers | ||
| Newark, NJ | 0.50 | 24th | -0.007 | 8th | 6% above peers | ||
| Greensboro, NC | 0.49 | 22nd | -0.005 | 9th | 4% above peers | ||
| Cleveland, OH | 0.51 | 27th | -0.005 | 10th | 9% above peers | ||
| Durham, NC | 0.46 | 13th | -0.003 | 11th | 2% below peers | ||
| Santa Ana, CA | 0.40 | 3rd | -0.001 | 12th | 14% below peers | ||
| St. Louis, MO | 0.50 | 25th | -0.001 | 13th | 7% above peers | ||
| Plano, TX | 0.45 | 9th | -0.001 | 14th | 5% below peers | ||
| Chandler, AZ | 0.42 | 5th | -0.001 | 15th | 10% below peers | ||
| Lexington, KY | 0.49 | 23rd | -0.001 | 16th | 5% above peers | ||
| Saint Paul, MN | 0.48 | 19th | -0.000 | 17th | 2% above peers | ||
| Pittsburgh, PA | 0.52 | 28th | +0.001 | 18th | 11% above peers | ||
| Anchorage municipality, AK | 0.43 | 6th | +0.001 | 19th | 8% below peers | ||
| Cincinnati, OH | 0.54 | 29th | +0.003 | 20th | 16% above peers | ||
| Corpus Christi, TX | 0.46 | 14th | +0.003 | 21st | 1% below peers | ||
| Lincoln, NE | 0.45 | 11th | +0.003 | 22nd | 4% below peers | ||
| Arlington, TX | 0.44 | 7th | +0.005 | 23rd | 7% below peers | ||
| Henderson, NV | 0.46 | 15th | +0.006 | 24th | 1% below peers | ||
| Madison, WI | 0.47 | 16th | +0.007 | 25th | on par with peers | ||
| Wichita, KS | 0.47 | 17th | +0.009 | 26th | 1% above peers | ||
| North Las Vegas, NV | 0.40 | 2nd | +0.008 | 27th | 14% below peers | ||
| Reno, NV | 0.48 | 18th | +0.011 | 28th | 2% above peers | ||
| Urban Honolulu, HI | 0.48 | 20th | +0.011 | 29th | 3% above peers | ||
| Gilbert, AZ | 0.39 | 1st | +0.013 | 30th | 16% below peers | ||
| Anaheim, CA | 0.45 | 10th | +0.015 | 31st | 5% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin, in the wrong direction for this metric.
SNAP rose 2.7 percentage points between the 2014-2018 and 2019-2023 surveys, from 11.3% to 14.0% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.2pp). That is movement in the wrong direction.
| Place | Latest2019-2023 survey | Today's rank | Change2014-2018 → 2019-2023 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 11.4% | +2.2pp | |||||
| United States ref | 11.8% | -0.5pp | |||||
| Santa Ana, CA | 11.3% | 15th | -4.7pp | 1st | 8% below peers | ||
| Durham, NC | 9.3% | 10th | -2.7pp | 2nd | 24% below peers | ||
| Lexington, KY | 8.5% | 6th | -1.9pp | 3rd | 30% below peers | ||
| Jersey City, NJ | 14.0% | 18th | -2.9pp | 4th | 14% above peers | ||
| Saint Paul, MN | 15.0% | 20th | -2.9pp | 5th | 23% above peers | ||
| Gilbert, AZ | 3.4% | 1st | -0.6pp | 6th | 72% below peers | ||
| St. Louis, MO | 18.0% | 25th | -3.3pp | 7th | 47% above peers | ||
| Orlando, FL | 15.0% | 19th | -2.3pp | 8th | 23% above peers | ||
| Cincinnati, OH | 18.3% | 26th | -2.6pp | 9th | 50% above peers | ||
| Newark, NJ | 23.7% | 29th | -3.3pp | 10th | 93% above peers | ||
| Arlington, TX | 10.4% | 11th | -1.4pp | 11th | 15% below peers | ||
| Cleveland, OH | 31.5% | 30th | -3.1pp | 12th | 157% above peers | ||
| Wichita, KS | 11.1% | 14th | -1.0pp | 13th | 9% below peers | ||
| North Las Vegas, NV | 15.1% | 21st | -1.2pp | 14th | 23% above peers | ||
| Pittsburgh, PA | 16.5% | 22nd | -0.7pp | 15th | 35% above peers | ||
| Chandler, AZ | 5.3% | 4th | -0.2pp | 16th | 57% below peers | ||
| Lincoln, NE | 8.9% | 8th | -0.0pp | 17th | 27% below peers | ||
| New Orleans, LA | 18.5% | 27th | +0.0pp | 18th | 51% above peers | ||
| Anchorage municipality, AK | 8.8% | 7th | +0.1pp | 19th | 28% below peers | ||
| Corpus Christi, TX | 16.8% | 23rd | +0.3pp | 20th | 37% above peers | ||
| Stockton, CA | 20.8% | 28th | +0.8pp | 21st | 70% above peers | ||
| Riverside, CA | 11.1% | 13th | +0.5pp | 22nd | 9% below peers | ||
| Reno, NV | 12.2% | 16th | +0.8pp | 23rd | on par with peers | ||
| Urban Honolulu, HI | 10.8% | 12th | +1.0pp | 24th | 12% below peers | ||
| Greensboro, NC | 17.4% | 24th | +1.8pp | 25th | 42% above peers | ||
| Madison, WI | 9.2% | 9th | +1.0pp | 26th | 24% below peers | ||
| Plano, TX | 3.4% | 2nd | +0.5pp | 27th | 72% below peers | ||
| San Juan zona urbana, PR | 34.6% | 31st | +5.9pp | 28th | 183% above peers | ||
| Henderson, NV | 7.7% | 5th | +1.4pp | 29th | 37% below peers | ||
| Anaheim, CA | 14.0% | 17th | +2.7pp | 30th | 14% above peers | ||
| Irvine, CA | 4.9% | 3rd | +2.3pp | 31st | 60% below peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers. Anaheim is rising faster than most of the selected peers.
Home value rose about 3% over the 12 months ending August 2026, faster than 89% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | $764,158 (Aug 26) | +0.4% | ||||
| United States ref | $368,697 (Aug 26) | +1.2% | ||||
| Anchorage municipality, AK | $422,785 (Aug 26) | 15th | +5.3% | 1st | 1% below peers | |
| Santa Ana, CA | $868,002 (Aug 26) | 3rd | +3.3% | 2nd | 104% above peers | |
| Lincoln, NE | $293,764 (Aug 26) | 20th | +3.0% | 3rd | 31% below peers | |
| Anaheim, CA | $946,371 (Aug 26) | 2nd | +2.7% | 4th | 122% above peers | |
| Wichita, KS | $207,080 (Aug 26) | 26th | +2.7% | 5th | 51% below peers | |
| Madison, WI | $426,336 (Aug 26) | 14th | +2.5% | 6th | on par with peers | |
| Urban Honolulu, HI | $856,332 (Aug 26) | 4th | +2.3% | 7th | 101% above peers | |
| Reno, NV | $573,360 (Aug 26) | 7th | +1.4% | 8th | 34% above peers | |
| Cincinnati, OH | $249,297 (Aug 26) | 22nd | +0.5% | 9th | 42% below peers | |
| Riverside, CA | $645,110 (Aug 26) | 6th | +0.5% | 10th | 51% above peers | |
| Corpus Christi, TX | $223,078 (Aug 26) | 25th | +0.3% | 11th | 48% below peers | |
| Greensboro, NC | $263,264 (Aug 26) | 21st | +0.0% | 12th | 38% below peers | |
| Jersey City, NJ | $657,765 (Aug 26) | 5th | -0.2% | 13th | 54% above peers | |
| St. Louis, MO | $181,925 (Aug 26) | 27th | -0.3% | 14th | 57% below peers | |
| Gilbert, AZ | $566,873 (Aug 26) | 8th | -0.3% | 15th | 33% above peers | |
| Arlington, TX | $309,891 (Aug 26) | 19th | -0.8% | 16th | 27% below peers | |
| Pittsburgh, PA | $239,865 (Aug 26) | 24th | -1.0% | 17th | 44% below peers | |
| Newark, NJ | $481,850 (Aug 26) | 11th | -1.3% | 18th | 13% above peers | |
| Chandler, AZ | $515,351 (Aug 26) | 9th | -1.3% | 19th | 21% above peers | |
| Orlando, FL | $371,120 (Aug 26) | 18th | -1.4% | 20th | 13% below peers | |
| Cleveland, OH | $120,419 (Aug 26) | 28th | -1.4% | 21st | 72% below peers | |
| North Las Vegas, NV | $402,439 (Aug 26) | 16th | -1.5% | 22nd | 6% below peers | |
| Irvine, CA | $1,492,449 (Aug 26) | 1st | -1.8% | 23rd | 250% above peers | |
| New Orleans, LA | $243,781 (Aug 26) | 23rd | -1.9% | 24th | 43% below peers | |
| Stockton, CA | $427,285 (Aug 26) | 13th | -2.3% | 25th | on par with peers | |
| Henderson, NV | $479,263 (Aug 26) | 12th | -2.4% | 26th | 12% above peers | |
| Durham, NC | $389,634 (Aug 26) | 17th | -3.4% | 27th | 9% below peers | |
| Plano, TX | $493,092 (Aug 26) | 10th | -3.8% | 28th | 16% above peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers. Anaheim is rising faster than most of the selected peers.
Starter homes rose about 2% over the 12 months ending August 2026, faster than 81% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | $467,879 (Aug 26) | -0.0% | ||||
| United States ref | $200,550 (Aug 26) | +2.2% | ||||
| Anchorage municipality, AK | $288,422 (Aug 26) | 16th | +8.1% | 1st | 14% below peers | |
| Lincoln, NE | $216,087 (Aug 26) | 20th | +3.4% | 2nd | 35% below peers | |
| Wichita, KS | $125,010 (Aug 26) | 26th | +3.2% | 3rd | 63% below peers | |
| Santa Ana, CA | $602,608 (Aug 26) | 3rd | +2.8% | 4th | 81% above peers | |
| Corpus Christi, TX | $128,731 (Aug 26) | 25th | +2.4% | 5th | 61% below peers | |
| Anaheim, CA | $759,338 (Aug 26) | 2nd | +2.1% | 6th | 127% above peers | |
| Cincinnati, OH | $165,811 (Aug 26) | 22nd | +1.8% | 7th | 50% below peers | |
| Jersey City, NJ | $447,287 (Aug 26) | 7th | +1.4% | 8th | 34% above peers | |
| Newark, NJ | $384,631 (Aug 26) | 10th | +1.2% | 9th | 15% above peers | |
| Madison, WI | $312,158 (Aug 26) | 15th | +1.2% | 10th | 6% below peers | |
| Riverside, CA | $541,510 (Aug 26) | 4th | +1.0% | 11th | 62% above peers | |
| Reno, NV | $397,257 (Aug 26) | 9th | +0.8% | 12th | 19% above peers | |
| New Orleans, LA | $146,798 (Aug 26) | 23rd | +0.5% | 13th | 56% below peers | |
| Cleveland, OH | $73,450 (Aug 26) | 28th | +0.2% | 14th | 78% below peers | |
| Greensboro, NC | $171,051 (Aug 26) | 21st | -0.2% | 15th | 49% below peers | |
| Urban Honolulu, HI | $461,495 (Aug 26) | 5th | -0.3% | 16th | 38% above peers | |
| Arlington, TX | $248,825 (Aug 26) | 18th | -0.5% | 17th | 25% below peers | |
| Gilbert, AZ | $449,884 (Aug 26) | 6th | -1.0% | 18th | 35% above peers | |
| Pittsburgh, PA | $140,307 (Aug 26) | 24th | -1.2% | 19th | 58% below peers | |
| Irvine, CA | $1,017,448 (Aug 26) | 1st | -1.3% | 20th | 205% above peers | |
| North Las Vegas, NV | $333,778 (Aug 26) | 14th | -1.4% | 21st | on par with peers | |
| Stockton, CA | $336,675 (Aug 26) | 13th | -1.6% | 22nd | 1% above peers | |
| Chandler, AZ | $397,527 (Aug 26) | 8th | -2.3% | 23rd | 19% above peers | |
| Henderson, NV | $355,673 (Aug 26) | 12th | -2.5% | 24th | 7% above peers | |
| Orlando, FL | $236,142 (Aug 26) | 19th | -2.9% | 25th | 29% below peers | |
| Durham, NC | $282,309 (Aug 26) | 17th | -3.0% | 26th | 15% below peers | |
| St. Louis, MO | $75,581 (Aug 26) | 27th | -3.3% | 27th | 77% below peers | |
| Plano, TX | $362,238 (Aug 26) | 11th | -3.9% | 28th | 9% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Homeownership changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (44.9% then, 46.2% now; margin ±1.5pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 55.9% | +1.0pp | |||||
| United States ref | 65.2% | ||||||
| Orlando, FL | 39.5% | 29th | +4.1pp | 1st | 24% below peers | ||
| Stockton, CA | 53.9% | 12th | +5.2pp | 2nd | 3% above peers | ||
| Newark, NJ | 24.4% | 31st | +2.1pp | 3rd | 53% below peers | ||
| North Las Vegas, NV | 63.6% | 5th | +5.5pp | 4th | 22% above peers | ||
| Urban Honolulu, HI | 48.9% | 20th | +4.2pp | 5th | 6% below peers | ||
| New Orleans, LA | 51.2% | 17th | +2.9pp | 6th | 2% below peers | ||
| Cincinnati, OH | 39.8% | 28th | +2.1pp | 7th | 24% below peers | ||
| Riverside, CA | 56.8% | 9th | +2.8pp | 8th | 9% above peers | ||
| Saint Paul, MN | 52.9% | 14th | +2.5pp | 9th | 1% above peers | ||
| Durham, NC | 52.3% | 16th | +2.1pp | 10th | on par with peers | ||
| Anchorage municipality, AK | 63.9% | 4th | +2.6pp | 11th | 22% above peers | ||
| Reno, NV | 49.8% | 19th | +1.9pp | 12th | 5% below peers | ||
| St. Louis, MO | 45.3% | 24th | +1.6pp | 13th | 13% below peers | ||
| Henderson, NV | 66.1% | 2nd | +2.0pp | 14th | 26% above peers | ||
| Anaheim, CA | 46.2% | 22nd | +1.4pp | 15th | 12% below peers | ||
| Corpus Christi, TX | 57.9% | 7th | +1.2pp | 16th | 11% above peers | ||
| Pittsburgh, PA | 47.7% | 21st | +0.5pp | 17th | 9% below peers | ||
| Greensboro, NC | 50.5% | 18th | +0.2pp | 18th | 3% below peers | ||
| Cleveland, OH | 41.7% | 27th | +0.2pp | 19th | 20% below peers | ||
| Wichita, KS | 58.9% | 6th | +0.1pp | 20th | 13% above peers | ||
| Chandler, AZ | 65.0% | 3rd | +0.1pp | 21st | 24% above peers | ||
| Gilbert, AZ | 73.1% | 1st | -0.7pp | 22nd | 40% above peers | ||
| Lexington, KY | 53.8% | 13th | -0.7pp | 23rd | 3% above peers | ||
| San Juan zona urbana, PR | 52.5% | 15th | -0.8pp | 24th | on par with peers | ||
| Lincoln, NE | 56.1% | 10th | -0.9pp | 25th | 7% above peers | ||
| Arlington, TX | 54.3% | 11th | -0.9pp | 26th | 4% above peers | ||
| Madison, WI | 46.0% | 23rd | -1.0pp | 27th | 12% below peers | ||
| Santa Ana, CA | 44.6% | 25th | -1.5pp | 28th | 15% below peers | ||
| Plano, TX | 56.9% | 8th | -2.2pp | 29th | 9% above peers | ||
| Jersey City, NJ | 27.9% | 30th | -1.2pp | 30th | 47% below peers | ||
| Irvine, CA | 44.5% | 26th | -2.4pp | 31st | 15% below peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers. Anaheim is rising faster than most of the selected peers.
Rent rose about 2% over the 12 months ending August 2026, faster than 67% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States ref | $1,948 (Aug 26) | +2.5% | ||||
| Reno, NV | $1,967 (Aug 26) | 10th | +7.1% | 1st | 9% above peers | |
| Cleveland, OH | $1,391 (Aug 26) | 25th | +4.6% | 2nd | 23% below peers | |
| Urban Honolulu, HI | $3,020 (Aug 26) | 3rd | +4.6% | 3rd | 67% above peers | |
| Anchorage municipality, AK | $1,802 (Aug 26) | 15th | +4.2% | 4th | on par with peers | |
| Wichita, KS | $1,158 (Aug 26) | 28th | +4.2% | 5th | 36% below peers | |
| Pittsburgh, PA | $1,545 (Aug 26) | 20th | +3.6% | 6th | 14% below peers | |
| St. Louis, MO | $1,330 (Aug 26) | 26th | +3.5% | 7th | 26% below peers | |
| Jersey City, NJ | $3,157 (Aug 26) | 2nd | +3.0% | 8th | 75% above peers | |
| Cincinnati, OH | $1,414 (Aug 26) | 23rd | +2.7% | 9th | 22% below peers | |
| Anaheim, CA | $2,759 (Aug 26) | 5th | +2.3% | 10th | 53% above peers | |
| Greensboro, NC | $1,392 (Aug 26) | 24th | +2.1% | 11th | 23% below peers | |
| Riverside, CA | $2,444 (Aug 26) | 6th | +2.1% | 12th | 35% above peers | |
| Lincoln, NE | $1,308 (Aug 26) | 27th | +2.0% | 13th | 28% below peers | |
| Corpus Christi, TX | $1,424 (Aug 26) | 22nd | +1.9% | 14th | 21% below peers | |
| Durham, NC | $1,659 (Aug 26) | 17th | +1.8% | 15th | 8% below peers | |
| Madison, WI | $1,616 (Aug 26) | 19th | +1.8% | 16th | 10% below peers | |
| Santa Ana, CA | $2,812 (Aug 26) | 4th | +1.7% | 17th | 56% above peers | |
| New Orleans, LA | $1,637 (Aug 26) | 18th | +1.4% | 18th | 9% below peers | |
| Chandler, AZ | $1,868 (Aug 26) | 13th | +1.4% | 19th | 3% above peers | |
| Irvine, CA | $3,527 (Aug 26) | 1st | +1.1% | 20th | 95% above peers | |
| Arlington, TX | $1,462 (Aug 26) | 21st | +0.9% | 21st | 19% below peers | |
| Gilbert, AZ | $2,075 (Aug 26) | 8th | +0.8% | 22nd | 15% above peers | |
| Stockton, CA | $2,010 (Aug 26) | 9th | +0.7% | 23rd | 11% above peers | |
| Orlando, FL | $1,896 (Aug 26) | 11th | +0.6% | 24th | 5% above peers | |
| Newark, NJ | $2,114 (Aug 26) | 7th | +0.5% | 25th | 17% above peers | |
| Plano, TX | $1,742 (Aug 26) | 16th | +0.3% | 26th | 4% below peers | |
| Henderson, NV | $1,806 (Aug 26) | 14th | -0.0% | 27th | on par with peers | |
| North Las Vegas, NV | $1,889 (Aug 26) | 12th | -0.0% | 28th | 5% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Cost burden changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (47.6% then, 47.3% now; margin ±2.0pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 41.7% | +0.0pp | |||||
| United States ref | 32.2% | +0.4pp | |||||
| Santa Ana, CA | 42.6% | 26th | -4.5pp | 1st | 15% above peers | ||
| St. Louis, MO | 34.2% | 10th | -3.2pp | 2nd | 7% below peers | ||
| Newark, NJ | 53.8% | 31st | -4.6pp | 3rd | 46% above peers | ||
| San Juan zona urbana, PR | 36.6% | 15th | -2.9pp | 4th | 1% below peers | ||
| Stockton, CA | 41.0% | 22nd | -2.2pp | 5th | 11% above peers | ||
| Durham, NC | 31.9% | 7th | -1.6pp | 6th | 13% below peers | ||
| Wichita, KS | 28.1% | 3rd | -0.7pp | 7th | 24% below peers | ||
| Anchorage municipality, AK | 31.1% | 6th | -0.7pp | 8th | 16% below peers | ||
| Jersey City, NJ | 41.7% | 23rd | -0.8pp | 9th | 13% above peers | ||
| New Orleans, LA | 45.3% | 28th | -0.8pp | 10th | 23% above peers | ||
| Irvine, CA | 42.5% | 24th | -0.4pp | 11th | 15% above peers | ||
| Anaheim, CA | 47.3% | 30th | -0.3pp | 12th | 28% above peers | ||
| Cleveland, OH | 40.7% | 21st | +0.2pp | 13th | 10% above peers | ||
| Urban Honolulu, HI | 43.6% | 27th | +0.4pp | 14th | 18% above peers | ||
| Cincinnati, OH | 38.9% | 18th | +0.4pp | 15th | 6% above peers | ||
| Pittsburgh, PA | 33.6% | 9th | +0.4pp | 16th | 9% below peers | ||
| Chandler, AZ | 27.1% | 2nd | +0.7pp | 17th | 26% below peers | ||
| Gilbert, AZ | 25.3% | 1st | +0.6pp | 18th | 31% below peers | ||
| Riverside, CA | 42.5% | 25th | +1.5pp | 19th | 15% above peers | ||
| Madison, WI | 36.4% | 14th | +1.4pp | 20th | 1% below peers | ||
| Saint Paul, MN | 35.7% | 13th | +1.5pp | 21st | 3% below peers | ||
| Orlando, FL | 46.0% | 29th | +2.0pp | 22nd | 25% above peers | ||
| Lexington, KY | 32.1% | 8th | +1.6pp | 23rd | 13% below peers | ||
| Reno, NV | 36.9% | 17th | +1.8pp | 24th | on par with peers | ||
| Greensboro, NC | 36.9% | 16th | +2.0pp | 25th | on par with peers | ||
| Lincoln, NE | 30.3% | 4th | +1.9pp | 26th | 18% below peers | ||
| North Las Vegas, NV | 39.0% | 19th | +2.6pp | 27th | 6% above peers | ||
| Corpus Christi, TX | 35.1% | 12th | +2.6pp | 28th | 5% below peers | ||
| Henderson, NV | 34.9% | 11th | +3.6pp | 29th | 5% below peers | ||
| Plano, TX | 30.5% | 5th | +3.4pp | 30th | 17% below peers | ||
| Arlington, TX | 39.6% | 20th | +5.5pp | 31st | 7% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
No vehicle changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (5.4% then, 5.6% now; margin ±0.7pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 7.1% | -0.0pp | |||||
| United States ref | 8.3% | -0.3pp | |||||
| Stockton, CA | 7.2% | 15th | -2.0pp | 1st | on par with peers | ||
| Riverside, CA | 4.5% | 5th | -1.2pp | 2nd | 37% below peers | ||
| San Juan zona urbana, PR | 20.4% | 27th | -4.8pp | 3rd | 184% above peers | ||
| Durham, NC | 7.2% | 17th | -1.4pp | 4th | on par with peers | ||
| Cincinnati, OH | 17.1% | 24th | -2.8pp | 5th | 137% above peers | ||
| Wichita, KS | 6.4% | 12th | -1.0pp | 6th | 12% below peers | ||
| Pittsburgh, PA | 20.6% | 28th | -2.7pp | 7th | 186% above peers | ||
| Chandler, AZ | 3.3% | 2nd | -0.4pp | 8th | 54% below peers | ||
| Newark, NJ | 34.3% | 30th | -4.1pp | 9th | 376% above peers | ||
| Lexington, KY | 7.2% | 16th | -0.7pp | 10th | on par with peers | ||
| Reno, NV | 8.4% | 20th | -0.7pp | 11th | 16% above peers | ||
| Orlando, FL | 7.4% | 18th | -0.6pp | 12th | 3% above peers | ||
| Corpus Christi, TX | 7.0% | 14th | -0.5pp | 13th | 3% below peers | ||
| New Orleans, LA | 17.4% | 25th | -1.1pp | 14th | 142% above peers | ||
| St. Louis, MO | 18.5% | 26th | -1.2pp | 15th | 157% above peers | ||
| Cleveland, OH | 22.1% | 29th | -1.0pp | 16th | 206% above peers | ||
| North Las Vegas, NV | 5.2% | 7th | -0.2pp | 17th | 28% below peers | ||
| Anchorage municipality, AK | 5.8% | 10th | -0.2pp | 18th | 19% below peers | ||
| Saint Paul, MN | 13.0% | 22nd | -0.3pp | 19th | 81% above peers | ||
| Urban Honolulu, HI | 16.6% | 23rd | +0.0pp | 20th | 131% above peers | ||
| Anaheim, CA | 5.6% | 9th | +0.2pp | 21st | 23% below peers | ||
| Jersey City, NJ | 40.3% | 31st | +1.8pp | 22nd | 459% above peers | ||
| Madison, WI | 12.2% | 21st | +0.8pp | 23rd | 69% above peers | ||
| Greensboro, NC | 8.2% | 19th | +0.6pp | 24th | 13% above peers | ||
| Henderson, NV | 4.3% | 4th | +0.3pp | 25th | 40% below peers | ||
| Santa Ana, CA | 6.0% | 11th | +0.5pp | 26th | 16% below peers | ||
| Irvine, CA | 5.3% | 8th | +0.5pp | 27th | 27% below peers | ||
| Lincoln, NE | 6.7% | 13th | +0.8pp | 28th | 7% below peers | ||
| Plano, TX | 3.7% | 3rd | +0.5pp | 29th | 48% below peers | ||
| Arlington, TX | 5.0% | 6th | +0.9pp | 30th | 30% below peers | ||
| Gilbert, AZ | 2.3% | 1st | +0.6pp | 31st | 68% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Uninsured fell 2.1 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 12.0% to 9.9% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.7pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 6.6% | -0.9pp | |||||
| United States ref | 8.4% | -0.4pp | |||||
| Jersey City, NJ | 8.5% | 17th | -2.9pp | 1st | on par with peers | ||
| Santa Ana, CA | 12.2% | 25th | -3.5pp | 2nd | 43% above peers | ||
| Greensboro, NC | 8.4% | 15th | -1.9pp | 3rd | 1% below peers | ||
| Anaheim, CA | 9.9% | 21st | -2.1pp | 4th | 17% above peers | ||
| Lincoln, NE | 6.3% | 6th | -1.3pp | 5th | 25% below peers | ||
| Durham, NC | 10.7% | 24th | -1.8pp | 6th | 26% above peers | ||
| St. Louis, MO | 9.3% | 19th | -1.5pp | 7th | 9% above peers | ||
| New Orleans, LA | 8.1% | 14th | -1.1pp | 8th | 5% below peers | ||
| Anchorage municipality, AK | 9.8% | 20th | -1.4pp | 9th | 16% above peers | ||
| Irvine, CA | 4.0% | 2nd | -0.5pp | 10th | 53% below peers | ||
| San Juan zona urbana, PR | 8.5% | 16th | -1.1pp | 11th | on par with peers | ||
| Chandler, AZ | 6.6% | 7th | -0.7pp | 12th | 23% below peers | ||
| Urban Honolulu, HI | 3.6% | 1st | -0.4pp | 13th | 58% below peers | ||
| Pittsburgh, PA | 4.8% | 4th | -0.5pp | 14th | 43% below peers | ||
| Orlando, FL | 13.9% | 28th | -1.3pp | 15th | 63% above peers | ||
| Riverside, CA | 8.9% | 18th | -0.5pp | 16th | 5% above peers | ||
| Plano, TX | 10.7% | 23rd | -0.5pp | 17th | 25% above peers | ||
| North Las Vegas, NV | 13.3% | 27th | -0.1pp | 18th | 57% above peers | ||
| Stockton, CA | 6.9% | 10th | +0.1pp | 19th | 19% below peers | ||
| Wichita, KS | 12.4% | 26th | +0.2pp | 20th | 46% above peers | ||
| Saint Paul, MN | 6.7% | 8th | +0.1pp | 21st | 22% below peers | ||
| Henderson, NV | 6.7% | 9th | +0.2pp | 22nd | 21% below peers | ||
| Corpus Christi, TX | 17.8% | 29th | +0.6pp | 23rd | 109% above peers | ||
| Arlington, TX | 19.0% | 30th | +0.7pp | 24th | 123% above peers | ||
| Cleveland, OH | 8.1% | 13th | +0.4pp | 25th | 5% below peers | ||
| Lexington, KY | 7.2% | 11th | +0.4pp | 26th | 15% below peers | ||
| Madison, WI | 4.2% | 3rd | +0.3pp | 27th | 50% below peers | ||
| Cincinnati, OH | 7.8% | 12th | +0.5pp | 28th | 8% below peers | ||
| Reno, NV | 10.6% | 22nd | +0.8pp | 29th | 24% above peers | ||
| Newark, NJ | 19.7% | 31st | +2.3pp | 30th | 132% above peers | ||
| Gilbert, AZ | 6.3% | 5th | +1.0pp | 31st | 26% below peers |
Modeled estimate with no usable trend; the level is shown and no trend claims are made.
Adult obesity is somewhat below the peer median.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 28.4% | |||
| United States ref | 33.4% | |||
| Irvine, CA | 20.3% | 1st | 40% below peers | |
| Urban Honolulu, HI | 24.4% | 2nd | 28% below peers | |
| Anaheim, CA | 28.2% | 3rd | 17% below peers | |
| Plano, TX | 28.2% | 4th | 17% below peers | |
| Jersey City, NJ | 29.1% | 5th | 14% below peers | |
| Gilbert, AZ | 29.8% | 6th | 12% below peers | |
| Henderson, NV | 30.1% | 7th | 11% below peers | |
| Reno, NV | 30.1% | 8th | 11% below peers | |
| Chandler, AZ | 30.2% | 9th | 11% below peers | |
| Anchorage municipality, AK | 30.4% | 10th | 10% below peers | |
| Santa Ana, CA | 30.8% | 11th | 9% below peers | |
| Madison, WI | 32.1% | 12th | 5% below peers | |
| Saint Paul, MN | 33.2% | 13th | 2% below peers | |
| Orlando, FL | 33.6% | 14th | 1% below peers | |
| Pittsburgh, PA | 33.8% | 15th | on par with peers | |
| Lincoln, NE | 33.8% | 16th | on par with peers | |
| Durham, NC | 33.9% | 17th | on par with peers | |
| Lexington, KY | 34.5% | 18th | 2% above peers | |
| Wichita, KS | 34.7% | 19th | 3% above peers | |
| Newark, NJ | 35.1% | 20th | 4% above peers | |
| Riverside, CA | 35.1% | 21st | 4% above peers | |
| Greensboro, NC | 35.1% | 22nd | 4% above peers | |
| Stockton, CA | 35.3% | 23rd | 4% above peers | |
| North Las Vegas, NV | 35.5% | 24th | 5% above peers | |
| New Orleans, LA | 37.2% | 25th | 10% above peers | |
| St. Louis, MO | 37.4% | 26th | 11% above peers | |
| Arlington, TX | 39.2% | 27th | 16% above peers | |
| Cincinnati, OH | 41.8% | 28th | 24% above peers | |
| Corpus Christi, TX | 42.7% | 29th | 26% above peers | |
| Cleveland, OH | 44.9% | 30th | 33% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Child uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (4.2% then, 3.5% now; margin ±0.9pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 3.2% | -0.0pp | |||||
| United States ref | 5.5% | +0.4pp | |||||
| Lexington, KY | 3.0% | 5th | -1.3pp | 1st | 42% below peers | ||
| Jersey City, NJ | 3.9% | 10th | -1.6pp | 2nd | 25% below peers | ||
| Lincoln, NE | 3.8% | 9th | -1.4pp | 3rd | 27% below peers | ||
| Irvine, CA | 2.2% | 1st | -0.7pp | 4th | 57% below peers | ||
| Greensboro, NC | 3.5% | 8th | -1.0pp | 5th | 32% below peers | ||
| Anaheim, CA | 3.5% | 7th | -0.8pp | 6th | 32% below peers | ||
| Reno, NV | 6.8% | 23rd | -1.2pp | 7th | 33% above peers | ||
| Chandler, AZ | 5.4% | 18th | -0.9pp | 8th | 4% above peers | ||
| Corpus Christi, TX | 8.1% | 27th | -1.1pp | 9th | 57% above peers | ||
| Anchorage municipality, AK | 7.3% | 24th | -0.8pp | 10th | 43% above peers | ||
| Urban Honolulu, HI | 2.2% | 2nd | -0.2pp | 11th | 56% below peers | ||
| St. Louis, MO | 4.9% | 14th | -0.2pp | 12th | 5% below peers | ||
| Wichita, KS | 6.5% | 22nd | -0.1pp | 13th | 26% above peers | ||
| North Las Vegas, NV | 7.8% | 25th | -0.1pp | 14th | 52% above peers | ||
| Saint Paul, MN | 4.4% | 12th | -0.0pp | 15th | 15% below peers | ||
| Pittsburgh, PA | 3.5% | 6th | +0.2pp | 16th | 33% below peers | ||
| Riverside, CA | 3.9% | 11th | +0.3pp | 17th | 25% below peers | ||
| Durham, NC | 8.0% | 26th | +0.6pp | 18th | 55% above peers | ||
| Plano, TX | 9.1% | 28th | +0.8pp | 19th | 77% above peers | ||
| Gilbert, AZ | 5.1% | 15th | +0.4pp | 20th | on par with peers | ||
| Santa Ana, CA | 5.2% | 17th | +0.5pp | 21st | 2% above peers | ||
| Stockton, CA | 2.9% | 4th | +0.3pp | 22nd | 43% below peers | ||
| Arlington, TX | 13.1% | 31st | +1.8pp | 23rd | 154% above peers | ||
| Henderson, NV | 6.5% | 21st | +1.0pp | 24th | 26% above peers | ||
| San Juan zona urbana, PR | 5.1% | 16th | +0.8pp | 25th | on par with peers | ||
| Madison, WI | 2.8% | 3rd | +0.5pp | 26th | 46% below peers | ||
| Orlando, FL | 9.7% | 29th | +2.1pp | 27th | 88% above peers | ||
| Cincinnati, OH | 5.8% | 20th | +1.4pp | 28th | 14% above peers | ||
| Newark, NJ | 11.3% | 30th | +3.2pp | 29th | 120% above peers | ||
| Cleveland, OH | 4.4% | 13th | +1.3pp | 30th | 14% below peers | ||
| New Orleans, LA | 5.4% | 19th | +1.9pp | 31st | 4% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
College attainment rose 4.2 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 25.5% to 29.7% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.2pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 37.1% | +3.1pp | |||||
| United States ref | 35.7% | +3.5pp | |||||
| Newark, NJ | 19.7% | 28th | +4.5pp | 1st | 52% below peers | ||
| Cleveland, OH | 22.4% | 26th | +4.9pp | 2nd | 46% below peers | ||
| Santa Ana, CA | 18.3% | 30th | +3.3pp | 3rd | 56% below peers | ||
| Anaheim, CA | 29.7% | 23rd | +4.2pp | 4th | 28% below peers | ||
| Durham, NC | 57.3% | 4th | +7.7pp | 5th | 38% above peers | ||
| Jersey City, NJ | 54.8% | 5th | +7.2pp | 6th | 32% above peers | ||
| St. Louis, MO | 41.1% | 16th | +4.8pp | 7th | 1% below peers | ||
| New Orleans, LA | 42.4% | 12th | +4.8pp | 8th | 2% above peers | ||
| Cincinnati, OH | 41.8% | 13th | +4.7pp | 9th | 1% above peers | ||
| Henderson, NV | 37.4% | 19th | +4.0pp | 10th | 10% below peers | ||
| North Las Vegas, NV | 18.9% | 29th | +2.0pp | 11th | 55% below peers | ||
| Riverside, CA | 25.7% | 24th | +2.7pp | 12th | 38% below peers | ||
| Orlando, FL | 42.5% | 11th | +4.5pp | 13th | 3% above peers | ||
| Urban Honolulu, HI | 41.5% | 15th | +4.3pp | 14th | on par with peers | ||
| Lexington, KY | 48.3% | 7th | +4.6pp | 15th | 16% above peers | ||
| Corpus Christi, TX | 24.4% | 25th | +2.3pp | 16th | 41% below peers | ||
| Pittsburgh, PA | 49.1% | 6th | +4.5pp | 17th | 18% above peers | ||
| Reno, NV | 36.8% | 20th | +3.2pp | 18th | 11% below peers | ||
| Stockton, CA | 20.0% | 27th | +1.7pp | 19th | 52% below peers | ||
| Gilbert, AZ | 48.2% | 8th | +3.8pp | 20th | 16% above peers | ||
| Arlington, TX | 32.6% | 21st | +2.3pp | 21st | 21% below peers | ||
| Saint Paul, MN | 43.8% | 10th | +3.0pp | 22nd | 5% above peers | ||
| Greensboro, NC | 41.0% | 17th | +2.8pp | 23rd | 1% below peers | ||
| Anchorage municipality, AK | 38.6% | 18th | +2.5pp | 24th | 7% below peers | ||
| Chandler, AZ | 47.8% | 9th | +3.0pp | 25th | 15% above peers | ||
| Plano, TX | 60.5% | 2nd | +3.3pp | 26th | 46% above peers | ||
| Lincoln, NE | 41.8% | 14th | +2.2pp | 27th | 1% above peers | ||
| Madison, WI | 59.9% | 3rd | +2.0pp | 28th | 44% above peers | ||
| Wichita, KS | 31.1% | 22nd | +1.0pp | 29th | 25% below peers | ||
| Irvine, CA | 70.6% | 1st | +1.8pp | 30th | 70% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is within the margin, but each of the last 3 annual releases moved the 5-year average the same way. Direction is a reliable early signal; its size is not.
Preschool enrollment changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (44.2% then, 51.3% now; margin ±8.4pp). The newest releases lean upward: each of the last 3 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 44.5% | -5.1pp | |||||
| United States ref | 45.5% | ||||||
| Corpus Christi, TX | 47.8% | 12th | +8.0pp | 1st | 7% above peers | ||
| Anaheim, CA | 51.3% | 9th | +7.1pp | 2nd | 14% above peers | ||
| Riverside, CA | 41.0% | 20th | +4.8pp | 3rd | 8% below peers | ||
| Henderson, NV | 43.8% | 17th | +3.5pp | 4th | 2% below peers | ||
| Arlington, TX | 39.7% | 23rd | +2.0pp | 5th | 11% below peers | ||
| Madison, WI | 51.4% | 8th | +2.1pp | 6th | 15% above peers | ||
| St. Louis, MO | 53.8% | 7th | +1.0pp | 7th | 20% above peers | ||
| Chandler, AZ | 46.9% | 15th | +0.8pp | 8th | 5% above peers | ||
| Cincinnati, OH | 47.6% | 14th | -0.2pp | 9th | 6% above peers | ||
| Pittsburgh, PA | 50.9% | 10th | -0.4pp | 10th | 14% above peers | ||
| New Orleans, LA | 61.5% | 3rd | -2.4pp | 11th | 37% above peers | ||
| Wichita, KS | 36.5% | 27th | -1.5pp | 12th | 19% below peers | ||
| Plano, TX | 47.7% | 13th | -2.1pp | 13th | 6% above peers | ||
| Jersey City, NJ | 73.2% | 1st | -3.6pp | 14th | 63% above peers | ||
| Saint Paul, MN | 36.2% | 28th | -1.8pp | 15th | 19% below peers | ||
| Santa Ana, CA | 43.0% | 18th | -2.8pp | 16th | 4% below peers | ||
| Anchorage municipality, AK | 34.2% | 29th | -2.4pp | 17th | 24% below peers | ||
| Stockton, CA | 39.5% | 24th | -2.8pp | 18th | 12% below peers | ||
| Newark, NJ | 67.5% | 2nd | -5.8pp | 19th | 51% above peers | ||
| Lincoln, NE | 41.4% | 19th | -3.9pp | 20th | 8% below peers | ||
| Orlando, FL | 55.1% | 6th | -6.2pp | 21st | 23% above peers | ||
| Gilbert, AZ | 50.1% | 11th | -6.6pp | 22nd | 12% above peers | ||
| Greensboro, NC | 37.0% | 25th | -4.9pp | 23rd | 18% below peers | ||
| Lexington, KY | 41.0% | 21st | -7.3pp | 24th | 9% below peers | ||
| Durham, NC | 39.8% | 22nd | -7.2pp | 25th | 11% below peers | ||
| Reno, NV | 36.8% | 26th | -7.2pp | 26th | 18% below peers | ||
| Irvine, CA | 59.6% | 4th | -12.5pp | 27th | 33% above peers | ||
| North Las Vegas, NV | 26.7% | 31st | -6.6pp | 28th | 41% below peers | ||
| Cleveland, OH | 33.7% | 30th | -8.7pp | 29th | 25% below peers | ||
| San Juan zona urbana, PR | 58.5% | 5th | -15.5pp | 30th | 31% above peers | ||
| Urban Honolulu, HI | 44.8% | 16th | -14.2pp | 31st | on par with peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Disconnected youth changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (6.1% then, 8.2% now; margin ±2.4pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 6.7% | +0.2pp | |||||
| United States ref | 6.9% | +0.3pp | |||||
| Orlando, FL | 4.3% | 7th | -4.4pp | 1st | 36% below peers | ||
| Chandler, AZ | 4.3% | 6th | -3.9pp | 2nd | 36% below peers | ||
| St. Louis, MO | 6.7% | 15th | -3.3pp | 3rd | on par with peers | ||
| Irvine, CA | 1.4% | 1st | -0.6pp | 4th | 80% below peers | ||
| Durham, NC | 4.5% | 8th | -1.2pp | 5th | 32% below peers | ||
| Greensboro, NC | 5.1% | 9th | -1.3pp | 6th | 24% below peers | ||
| Newark, NJ | 9.8% | 26th | -1.8pp | 7th | 47% above peers | ||
| Arlington, TX | 6.3% | 10th | -1.0pp | 8th | 6% below peers | ||
| Cincinnati, OH | 7.6% | 20th | -0.7pp | 9th | 13% above peers | ||
| Madison, WI | 2.2% | 2nd | -0.1pp | 10th | 67% below peers | ||
| New Orleans, LA | 8.1% | 22nd | -0.4pp | 11th | 21% above peers | ||
| Henderson, NV | 6.4% | 12th | -0.2pp | 12th | 4% below peers | ||
| Jersey City, NJ | 7.9% | 21st | -0.2pp | 13th | 19% above peers | ||
| Cleveland, OH | 10.4% | 28th | -0.2pp | 14th | 55% above peers | ||
| Anchorage municipality, AK | 8.4% | 24th | +0.1pp | 15th | 26% above peers | ||
| Reno, NV | 6.7% | 16th | +0.2pp | 16th | on par with peers | ||
| Pittsburgh, PA | 3.7% | 4th | +0.2pp | 17th | 44% below peers | ||
| Riverside, CA | 6.3% | 11th | +0.3pp | 18th | 6% below peers | ||
| Stockton, CA | 10.1% | 27th | +1.0pp | 19th | 51% above peers | ||
| Lexington, KY | 4.2% | 5th | +0.5pp | 20th | 37% below peers | ||
| San Juan zona urbana, PR | 12.1% | 29th | +1.5pp | 21st | 81% above peers | ||
| Saint Paul, MN | 6.8% | 18th | +0.9pp | 22nd | 2% above peers | ||
| Wichita, KS | 9.0% | 25th | +1.7pp | 23rd | 35% above peers | ||
| Urban Honolulu, HI | 6.5% | 14th | +1.3pp | 24th | 2% below peers | ||
| Lincoln, NE | 3.5% | 3rd | +0.7pp | 25th | 48% below peers | ||
| Corpus Christi, TX | 13.2% | 30th | +2.9pp | 26th | 97% above peers | ||
| Anaheim, CA | 8.2% | 23rd | +2.1pp | 27th | 22% above peers | ||
| Gilbert, AZ | 6.7% | 17th | +1.9pp | 28th | on par with peers | ||
| Plano, TX | 7.1% | 19th | +2.1pp | 29th | 6% above peers | ||
| Santa Ana, CA | 6.5% | 13th | +2.1pp | 30th | 3% below peers | ||
| North Las Vegas, NV | 14.1% | 31st | +5.0pp | 31st | 111% above peers |
A real change beyond the survey margin; neither direction is inherently better for this metric.
Population fell about 2% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 349,964 to 344,521 - more than the combined survey margin (±127). That reverses the previous span, which went up between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Las Vegas, NV | 278,595 | 29th | +15% | 1st | 10% below peers | ||
| Gilbert, AZ | 280,262 | 27th | +15% | 2nd | 10% below peers | ||
| Irvine, CA | 311,690 | 15th | +14% | 3rd | on par with peers | ||
| Orlando, FL | 319,758 | 10th | +14% | 4th | 3% above peers | ||
| Jersey City, NJ | 294,078 | 22nd | +12% | 5th | 6% below peers | ||
| Chandler, AZ | 280,136 | 28th | +11% | 6th | 10% below peers | ||
| Reno, NV | 273,212 | 31st | +11% | 7th | 12% below peers | ||
| Henderson, NV | 332,141 | 7th | +11% | 8th | 7% above peers | ||
| Newark, NJ | 310,178 | 17th | +10% | 9th | on par with peers | ||
| Madison, WI | 278,001 | 30th | +9% | 10th | 11% below peers | ||
| Durham, NC | 291,467 | 23rd | +8% | 11th | 6% below peers | ||
| Stockton, CA | 322,326 | 9th | +4% | 12th | 4% above peers | ||
| Lincoln, NE | 294,856 | 21st | +4% | 13th | 5% below peers | ||
| Greensboro, NC | 301,198 | 20th | +3% | 14th | 3% below peers | ||
| Cincinnati, OH | 311,224 | 16th | +3% | 15th | on par with peers | ||
| Wichita, KS | 397,945 | 1st | +2% | 16th | 28% above peers | ||
| Plano, TX | 290,594 | 24th | +1% | 17th | 7% below peers | ||
| Lexington, KY | 323,725 | 8th | +1% | 18th | 4% above peers | ||
| Saint Paul, MN | 307,284 | 18th | +1% | 19th | 1% below peers | ||
| Pittsburgh, PA | 304,759 | 19th | +1% | 20th | 2% below peers | ||
| Arlington, TX | 397,742 | 2nd | +1% | 21st | 28% above peers | ||
| Urban Honolulu, HI | 345,482 | 5th | -1% | 22nd | 11% above peers | ||
| Anchorage municipality, AK | 288,976 | 25th | -2% | 23rd | 7% below peers | ||
| Anaheim, CA | 344,521 | 6th | -2% | 24th | 11% above peers | ||
| San Juan zona urbana, PR | 317,995 | 12th | -2% | 25th | 2% above peers | ||
| Riverside, CA | 319,069 | 11th | -2% | 26th | 3% above peers | ||
| Corpus Christi, TX | 317,419 | 13th | -3% | 27th | 2% above peers | ||
| New Orleans, LA | 371,853 | 3rd | -5% | 28th | 19% above peers | ||
| Cleveland, OH | 366,097 | 4th | -5% | 29th | 18% above peers | ||
| Santa Ana, CA | 312,534 | 14th | -6% | 30th | on par with peers | ||
| St. Louis, MO | 288,512 | 26th | -6% | 31st | 7% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is within the margin, but each of the last 3 annual releases moved the 5-year average the same way. Direction is a reliable early signal; its size is not.
Single-parent changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (27.4% then, 29.7% now; margin ±3.2pp). The newest releases lean upward: each of the last 3 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 28.5% | +0.7pp | |||||
| United States ref | 29.9% | -0.2pp | |||||
| Chandler, AZ | 27.9% | 26th | +5.1pp | 1st | 19% below peers | ||
| Irvine, CA | 17.7% | 31st | +3.2pp | 2nd | 49% below peers | ||
| Gilbert, AZ | 19.9% | 29th | +3.5pp | 3rd | 43% below peers | ||
| Urban Honolulu, HI | 27.7% | 27th | +3.9pp | 4th | 20% below peers | ||
| Anchorage municipality, AK | 31.6% | 20th | +4.2pp | 5th | 9% below peers | ||
| Madison, WI | 31.3% | 21st | +3.5pp | 6th | 10% below peers | ||
| Henderson, NV | 28.8% | 25th | +2.4pp | 7th | 17% below peers | ||
| Anaheim, CA | 29.7% | 23rd | +2.3pp | 8th | 14% below peers | ||
| Stockton, CA | 41.2% | 9th | +3.1pp | 9th | 19% above peers | ||
| Reno, NV | 38.0% | 12th | +2.6pp | 10th | 10% above peers | ||
| San Juan zona urbana, PR | 68.2% | 2nd | +3.3pp | 11th | 97% above peers | ||
| Plano, TX | 19.4% | 30th | +0.7pp | 12th | 44% below peers | ||
| Santa Ana, CA | 29.5% | 24th | +0.9pp | 13th | 15% below peers | ||
| Saint Paul, MN | 39.6% | 10th | +1.2pp | 14th | 14% above peers | ||
| Lincoln, NE | 26.7% | 28th | +0.8pp | 15th | 23% below peers | ||
| Cleveland, OH | 71.9% | 1st | +1.9pp | 16th | 108% above peers | ||
| Corpus Christi, TX | 37.0% | 15th | +0.4pp | 17th | 7% above peers | ||
| North Las Vegas, NV | 37.2% | 14th | +0.3pp | 18th | 7% above peers | ||
| Newark, NJ | 58.1% | 3rd | -0.2pp | 19th | 68% above peers | ||
| Riverside, CA | 30.1% | 22nd | -0.6pp | 20th | 13% below peers | ||
| Greensboro, NC | 42.9% | 7th | -1.1pp | 21st | 24% above peers | ||
| Lexington, KY | 31.7% | 18th | -1.2pp | 22nd | 8% below peers | ||
| Wichita, KS | 34.6% | 16th | -1.6pp | 23rd | on par with peers | ||
| Pittsburgh, PA | 42.6% | 8th | -2.1pp | 24th | 23% above peers | ||
| New Orleans, LA | 53.7% | 5th | -4.0pp | 25th | 55% above peers | ||
| St. Louis, MO | 52.2% | 6th | -4.0pp | 26th | 51% above peers | ||
| Arlington, TX | 32.6% | 17th | -3.0pp | 27th | 6% below peers | ||
| Cincinnati, OH | 56.2% | 4th | -6.5pp | 28th | 62% above peers | ||
| Orlando, FL | 38.9% | 11th | -5.0pp | 29th | 12% above peers | ||
| Jersey City, NJ | 31.6% | 19th | -4.9pp | 30th | 9% below peers | ||
| Durham, NC | 37.4% | 13th | -5.9pp | 31st | 8% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Working parents changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (63.6% then, 68.2% now; margin ±5.0pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California ref | 66.5% | +3.8pp | |||||
| United States ref | 68.1% | +1.9pp | |||||
| Gilbert, AZ | 70.7% | 10th | +15.2pp | 1st | 3% above peers | ||
| North Las Vegas, NV | 69.3% | 14th | +8.0pp | 2nd | 1% above peers | ||
| Irvine, CA | 61.7% | 28th | +6.5pp | 3rd | 10% below peers | ||
| Urban Honolulu, HI | 68.2% | 17th | +6.0pp | 4th | on par with peers | ||
| Riverside, CA | 67.2% | 20th | +5.6pp | 5th | 2% below peers | ||
| Anaheim, CA | 68.2% | 18th | +4.6pp | 6th | 1% below peers | ||
| Jersey City, NJ | 65.3% | 23rd | +4.2pp | 7th | 5% below peers | ||
| Chandler, AZ | 67.6% | 19th | +4.2pp | 8th | 1% below peers | ||
| Stockton, CA | 63.5% | 26th | +3.8pp | 9th | 7% below peers | ||
| Plano, TX | 59.9% | 31st | +3.3pp | 10th | 13% below peers | ||
| Anchorage municipality, AK | 68.5% | 16th | +3.2pp | 11th | on par with peers | ||
| Santa Ana, CA | 62.8% | 27th | +2.4pp | 12th | 8% below peers | ||
| Arlington, TX | 67.2% | 21st | +1.8pp | 13th | 2% below peers | ||
| San Juan zona urbana, PR | 65.5% | 22nd | +1.5pp | 14th | 4% below peers | ||
| Newark, NJ | 72.3% | 7th | +1.5pp | 15th | 6% above peers | ||
| Wichita, KS | 70.3% | 11th | +1.2pp | 16th | 3% above peers | ||
| Lexington, KY | 74.2% | 5th | +1.1pp | 17th | 8% above peers | ||
| Reno, NV | 75.1% | 2nd | +0.3pp | 18th | 10% above peers | ||
| Durham, NC | 74.5% | 4th | -0.5pp | 19th | 9% above peers | ||
| Madison, WI | 75.9% | 1st | -0.7pp | 20th | 11% above peers | ||
| Pittsburgh, PA | 69.1% | 15th | -0.7pp | 21st | 1% above peers | ||
| Greensboro, NC | 69.6% | 13th | -0.8pp | 22nd | 2% above peers | ||
| Corpus Christi, TX | 60.9% | 30th | -0.8pp | 23rd | 11% below peers | ||
| New Orleans, LA | 70.2% | 12th | -1.0pp | 24th | 2% above peers | ||
| Cleveland, OH | 71.9% | 8th | -1.7pp | 25th | 5% above peers | ||
| Orlando, FL | 71.5% | 9th | -1.8pp | 26th | 4% above peers | ||
| Lincoln, NE | 73.5% | 6th | -1.9pp | 27th | 7% above peers | ||
| St. Louis, MO | 74.5% | 3rd | -2.2pp | 28th | 9% above peers | ||
| Henderson, NV | 61.3% | 29th | -3.4pp | 29th | 10% below peers | ||
| Saint Paul, MN | 64.9% | 24th | -6.9pp | 30th | 5% below peers | ||
| Cincinnati, OH | 64.5% | 25th | -7.3pp | 31st | 6% below peers |