The last 12 months moved in the better direction. The multi-year trend has not (yet) passed the checks below, so no sustained-improvement claim is made.
Violent crime fell about 10% over the 12 months ending July 2026, faster than 53% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 456 (Apr 26) | -9.3% | |||
| San Rafael, CA | 296 (Jul 26) | -36.9% | 1st | ||
| Lancaster, PA | 315 (Apr 26) | -32.4% | 2nd | ||
| Terre Haute, IN | 434 (Jun 26) | -25.0% | 3rd | ||
| Des Plaines, IL | 92 (Jul 26) | -25.0% | 4th | ||
| Bowie, MD | 149 (Jul 26) | -21.6% | 5th | ||
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | 303 (Jan 26) | -17.0% | 6th | ||
| Bozeman, MT | 383 (Jun 26) | -14.2% | 7th | ||
| Midwest City, OK | 296 (Jul 26) | -10.3% | 8th | ||
| Wake Forest, NC | 103 (Jul 26) | -9.1% | 9th | ||
| Springfield, OH | 1,285 (Dec 25) | -9.0% | 10th | ||
| Dubuque, IA | 374 (Jul 26) | -4.7% | 11th | ||
| Gardena, CA | 674 (Jul 26) | +0.3% | 12th | ||
| Youngstown, OH | 729 (Aug 25) | +1.8% | 13th | ||
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | 260 (Jul 26) | +13.5% | 14th | ||
| Hoboken, NJ | 215 (Jul 26) | +21.0% | 15th | ||
| Pocatello, ID | 383 (Jul 26) | +21.6% | 16th |
The most recent 12 months moved against the better direction, whatever the longer window shows. The checks below judge the multi-year window. Midwest City is also worsening faster than most of the selected peers.
Property crime rose about 2% over the 12 months ending July 2026, faster than 93% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 1,987 (Apr 26) | -12.2% | |||
| Wake Forest, NC | 843 (Jul 26) | -38.0% | 1st | ||
| San Rafael, CA | 1,591 (Jul 26) | -30.4% | 2nd | ||
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | 1,023 (Jan 26) | -28.1% | 3rd | ||
| Bowie, MD | 1,636 (Jul 26) | -26.8% | 4th | ||
| Terre Haute, IN | 2,898 (Jun 26) | -18.2% | 5th | ||
| Bozeman, MT | 1,503 (Jun 26) | -17.5% | 6th | ||
| Lancaster, PA | 1,234 (Apr 26) | -16.8% | 7th | ||
| Hoboken, NJ | 1,221 (Jul 26) | -15.4% | 8th | ||
| Pocatello, ID | 1,325 (Jul 26) | -15.3% | 9th | ||
| Dubuque, IA | 1,276 (Jul 26) | -15.3% | 10th | ||
| Springfield, OH | 4,152 (Dec 25) | -9.3% | 11th | ||
| Des Plaines, IL | 813 (Jul 26) | -8.8% | 12th | ||
| Gardena, CA | 2,869 (Jul 26) | -3.7% | 13th | ||
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | 717 (Jul 26) | -0.5% | 14th | ||
| Midwest City, OK | 2,243 (Jul 26) | +1.9% | 15th | ||
| Youngstown, OH | 2,920 (Aug 25) | +4.1% | 16th |
The last 12 months moved in the better direction. The multi-year trend has not (yet) passed the checks below, so no sustained-improvement claim is made. Midwest City is also improving faster than most of the selected peers.
Homicides fell about 100% over the 12 months ending July 2026, faster than 100% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 6 (Apr 26) | -17.8% | |||
| Midwest City, OK | 0 (Jul 26) | -100.0% | 1st | ||
| Hoboken, NJ | 0 (Jul 26) | -100.0% | 2nd | ||
| Gardena, CA | 0 (Jul 26) | -100.0% | 3rd | ||
| Youngstown, OH | 14 (Aug 25) | -55.6% | 4th | ||
| Bozeman, MT | 2 (Jun 26) | +0.0% | 5th | ||
| Bowie, MD | 2 (Jul 26) | +0.0% | 6th | ||
| Springfield, OH | 15 (Dec 25) | +80.6% | 7th | ||
| Terre Haute, IN | 3 (Jun 26) | +100.0% | 8th | ||
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | 5 (Jul 26) | +200.0% | 9th | ||
| Des Plaines, IL | 0 (Jul 26) | ||||
| Pocatello, ID | 0 (Jul 26) | ||||
| Dubuque, IA | 3 (Jul 26) | ||||
| Lancaster, PA | 5 (Jul 26) | ||||
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | 0 (Jan 26) | ||||
| San Rafael, CA | 3 (Jul 26) | ||||
| Wake Forest, NC | 3 (Jul 26) |
The last 12 months moved in the better direction. The multi-year trend has not (yet) passed the checks below, so no sustained-improvement claim is made. Most of the selected peers are improving faster than Midwest City.
Vehicle theft fell about 18% over the 12 months ending July 2026, slower than 67% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 303 (Apr 26) | -22.2% | |||
| Wake Forest, NC | 41 (Jul 26) | -57.1% | 1st | ||
| Lancaster, PA | 87 (Apr 26) | -40.0% | 2nd | ||
| Terre Haute, IN | 269 (Jun 26) | -38.3% | 3rd | ||
| Bozeman, MT | 70 (Jun 26) | -35.0% | 4th | ||
| Bowie, MD | 228 (Jul 26) | -34.8% | 5th | ||
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | 54 (Jan 26) | -34.7% | 6th | ||
| Dubuque, IA | 56 (Jul 26) | -31.3% | 7th | ||
| San Rafael, CA | 234 (Jul 26) | -30.8% | 8th | ||
| Gardena, CA | 556 (Jul 26) | -29.5% | 9th | ||
| Springfield, OH | 673 (Dec 25) | -18.9% | 10th | ||
| Midwest City, OK | 206 (Jul 26) | -18.2% | 11th | ||
| Pocatello, ID | 124 (Jul 26) | -17.0% | 12th | ||
| Youngstown, OH | 558 (Aug 25) | -7.2% | 13th | ||
| Des Plaines, IL | 107 (Jul 26) | +6.8% | 14th | ||
| Hoboken, NJ | 63 (Jul 26) | +23.3% | 15th | ||
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | 45 (Jul 26) | +30.0% | 16th |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Household income rose about 15% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from $49,914 to $57,520 (each survey's own dollars, not adjusted for inflation) - more than the combined survey margin (±$3,652).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | $65,039 | +23% | |||||
| United States ref | $80,734 | +28% | |||||
| Bozeman, MT | $85,747 | 13th | +54% | 1st | 14% above peers | ||
| Gardena, CA | $84,803 | 15th | +45% | 2nd | 13% above peers | ||
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | $72,338 | 18th | +42% | 3rd | 4% below peers | ||
| Des Plaines, IL | $97,875 | 10th | +40% | 4th | 30% above peers | ||
| Lancaster, PA | $63,690 | 23rd | +40% | 5th | 15% below peers | ||
| Cupertino, CA | $234,707 | 1st | +37% | 6th | 213% above peers | ||
| Bel Air South, MD | $123,653 | 6th | +36% | 7th | 65% above peers | ||
| Sarasota, FL | $72,105 | 19th | +34% | 8th | 4% below peers | ||
| Wake Forest, NC | $123,802 | 5th | +34% | 9th | 65% above peers | ||
| Lacey, WA | $90,625 | 11th | +34% | 10th | 21% above peers | ||
| Mayagüez zona urbana, PR | $17,410 | 31st | +32% | 11th | 77% below peers | ||
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | $70,148 | 21st | +31% | 12th | 6% below peers | ||
| Pico Rivera, CA | $88,201 | 12th | +30% | 13th | 18% above peers | ||
| Santee, CA | $113,394 | 8th | +30% | 14th | 51% above peers | ||
| San Rafael, CA | $119,435 | 7th | +30% | 15th | 59% above peers | ||
| Bradenton, FL | $60,822 | 25th | +30% | 16th | 19% below peers | ||
| Carson City, NV | $72,355 | 17th | +30% | 17th | 4% below peers | ||
| Pocatello, ID | $60,418 | 26th | +30% | 18th | 19% below peers | ||
| Decatur, AL | $61,563 | 24th | +27% | 19th | 18% below peers | ||
| Severn, MD | $134,423 | 4th | +25% | 20th | 79% above peers | ||
| Bowie, MD | $141,995 | 3rd | +25% | 21st | 89% above peers | ||
| Hoboken, NJ | $180,579 | 2nd | +22% | 22nd | 141% above peers | ||
| The Hammocks, FL | $85,628 | 14th | +22% | 23rd | 14% above peers | ||
| Dubuque, IA | $65,845 | 22nd | +21% | 24th | 12% below peers | ||
| Springfield, OH | $47,143 | 28th | +20% | 25th | 37% below peers | ||
| Youngstown, OH | $34,408 | 30th | +19% | 26th | 54% below peers | ||
| Coconut Creek, FL | $75,014 | 16th | +19% | 27th | on par with peers | ||
| Terre Haute, IN | $43,126 | 29th | +18% | 28th | 43% below peers | ||
| Midwest City, OK | $57,520 | 27th | +15% | 29th | 23% below peers | ||
| Towson, MD | $101,320 | 9th | +14% | 30th | 35% above peers | ||
| Casper, WY | $70,218 | 20th | +13% | 31st | 6% below peers |
The most recent 12 months moved against the better direction, whatever the longer window shows. The checks below judge the multi-year window. Midwest City is also worsening faster than most of the selected peers.
Unemployment rose 1.2 percentage points over the 12 months ending July 2026, faster than 96% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 4.3% (Jul 26) | +1.0pp | ||||
| United States ref | 4.1% (Aug 26) | -0.2pp | ||||
| Springfield, OH | 4.3% (Jul 26) | 13th | -1.5pp | 1st | on par with peers | |
| Pico Rivera, CA | 5.5% (Jul 26) | 24th | -1.1pp | 2nd | 28% above peers | |
| Gardena, CA | 5.0% (Jul 26) | 20th | -1.0pp | 3rd | 16% above peers | |
| Youngstown, OH | 6.3% (Jul 26) | 25th | -0.9pp | 4th | 47% above peers | |
| Lacey, WA | 3.7% (Jul 26) | 7th | -0.8pp | 5th | 14% below peers | |
| Terre Haute, IN | 4.4% (Jul 26) | 15th | -0.7pp | 6th | 2% above peers | |
| San Rafael, CA | 3.8% (Jul 26) | 9th | -0.6pp | 7th | 12% below peers | |
| Hoboken, NJ | 2.5% (Jul 26) | 2nd | -0.6pp | 8th | 42% below peers | |
| Casper, WY | 2.5% (Jul 26) | 3rd | -0.4pp | 9th | 42% below peers | |
| Santee, CA | 4.6% (Jul 26) | 18th | -0.3pp | 10th | 7% above peers | |
| Carson City, NV | 3.9% (Jul 26) | 10th | -0.3pp | 11th | 9% below peers | |
| Bozeman, MT | 2.2% (Jul 26) | 1st | -0.3pp | 12th | 49% below peers | |
| Dubuque, IA | 3.7% (Jul 26) | 8th | -0.3pp | 13th | 14% below peers | |
| Cupertino, CA | 4.3% (Jul 26) | 14th | -0.3pp | 14th | on par with peers | |
| Pocatello, ID | 4.2% (Jul 26) | 12th | -0.2pp | 15th | 2% below peers | |
| Lancaster, PA | 4.0% (Jul 26) | 11th | -0.2pp | 16th | 7% below peers | |
| Wake Forest, NC | 3.3% (Jul 26) | 5th | -0.2pp | 17th | 23% below peers | |
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | 3.6% (Jul 26) | 6th | -0.2pp | 18th | 16% below peers | |
| Bowie, MD | 4.5% (Jul 26) | 17th | +0.3pp | 19th | 5% above peers | |
| Decatur, AL | 3.1% (Jul 26) | 4th | +0.4pp | 20th | 28% below peers | |
| Des Plaines, IL | 4.7% (Jul 26) | 19th | +0.5pp | 21st | 9% above peers | |
| Bradenton, FL | 5.2% (Jul 26) | 23rd | +0.6pp | 22nd | 21% above peers | |
| Coconut Creek, FL | 4.4% (Jul 26) | 16th | +0.7pp | 23rd | 2% above peers | |
| Sarasota, FL | 5.0% (Jul 26) | 21st | +0.7pp | 24th | 16% above peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 5.0% (Jul 26) | 22nd | +1.2pp | 25th | 16% above peers | |
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | 6.4% (Jul 26) | 26th | +1.5pp | 26th | 49% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is within the margin, but each of the last 4 annual releases moved the 5-year average the same way. Direction is a reliable early signal; its size is not.
Poverty changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (14.8% then, 16.5% now; margin ±2.5pp). The newest releases lean upward: each of the last 4 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 15.3% | -0.3pp | |||||
| United States ref | 12.4% | ||||||
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | 9.2% | 9th | -5.7pp | 1st | 23% below peers | ||
| Cupertino, CA | 4.1% | 3rd | -1.9pp | 2nd | 66% below peers | ||
| Des Plaines, IL | 6.0% | 6th | -2.4pp | 3rd | 49% below peers | ||
| Bel Air South, MD | 3.9% | 2nd | -1.4pp | 4th | 67% below peers | ||
| Decatur, AL | 13.1% | 20th | -4.5pp | 5th | 11% above peers | ||
| Bozeman, MT | 13.7% | 21st | -4.1pp | 6th | 15% above peers | ||
| Dubuque, IA | 12.7% | 19th | -3.2pp | 7th | 7% above peers | ||
| Pocatello, ID | 14.8% | 23rd | -3.7pp | 8th | 25% above peers | ||
| Wake Forest, NC | 4.5% | 4th | -0.8pp | 9th | 62% below peers | ||
| Lancaster, PA | 20.3% | 27th | -3.6pp | 10th | 72% above peers | ||
| Gardena, CA | 11.8% | 16th | -1.9pp | 11th | on par with peers | ||
| Hoboken, NJ | 7.8% | 7th | -0.9pp | 12th | 34% below peers | ||
| Carson City, NV | 10.3% | 10th | -1.0pp | 13th | 13% below peers | ||
| Terre Haute, IN | 24.6% | 29th | -1.7pp | 14th | 108% above peers | ||
| Sarasota, FL | 15.0% | 25th | -0.7pp | 15th | 27% above peers | ||
| Bradenton, FL | 14.8% | 24th | -0.7pp | 16th | 25% above peers | ||
| San Rafael, CA | 11.7% | 15th | -0.5pp | 17th | 1% below peers | ||
| Mayagüez zona urbana, PR | 54.7% | 31st | -0.4pp | 18th | 362% above peers | ||
| Springfield, OH | 23.1% | 28th | -0.1pp | 19th | 95% above peers | ||
| Towson, MD | 12.1% | 18th | +0.6pp | 20th | 2% above peers | ||
| Youngstown, OH | 37.3% | 30th | +2.1pp | 21st | 215% above peers | ||
| Casper, WY | 10.8% | 12th | +0.7pp | 22nd | 9% below peers | ||
| Santee, CA | 7.9% | 8th | +0.7pp | 23rd | 33% below peers | ||
| The Hammocks, FL | 12.1% | 17th | +1.2pp | 24th | 2% above peers | ||
| Severn, MD | 5.7% | 5th | +0.6pp | 25th | 52% below peers | ||
| Midwest City, OK | 16.5% | 26th | +1.7pp | 26th | 39% above peers | ||
| Lacey, WA | 11.6% | 14th | +1.5pp | 27th | 2% below peers | ||
| Pico Rivera, CA | 10.3% | 11th | +1.5pp | 28th | 13% below peers | ||
| Bowie, MD | 3.8% | 1st | +0.6pp | 29th | 68% below peers | ||
| Coconut Creek, FL | 11.0% | 13th | +2.5pp | 30th | 7% below peers | ||
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | 14.1% | 22nd | +3.7pp | 31st | 19% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Child poverty changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (22.7% then, 23.6% now; margin ±3.9pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 20.1% | -1.5pp | |||||
| United States ref | 16.1% | ||||||
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | 9.3% | 11th | -11.0pp | 1st | 40% below peers | ||
| Des Plaines, IL | 6.8% | 7th | -3.2pp | 2nd | 56% below peers | ||
| Decatur, AL | 18.1% | 20th | -8.3pp | 3rd | 18% above peers | ||
| Bel Air South, MD | 4.1% | 4th | -1.6pp | 4th | 74% below peers | ||
| Hoboken, NJ | 6.1% | 5th | -2.4pp | 5th | 60% below peers | ||
| Dubuque, IA | 15.4% | 16th | -6.1pp | 6th | on par with peers | ||
| Severn, MD | 6.1% | 6th | -2.2pp | 7th | 60% below peers | ||
| Wake Forest, NC | 4.0% | 3rd | -1.3pp | 8th | 74% below peers | ||
| Bradenton, FL | 21.2% | 23rd | -6.9pp | 9th | 38% above peers | ||
| Carson City, NV | 13.2% | 13th | -3.6pp | 10th | 14% below peers | ||
| Cupertino, CA | 2.9% | 2nd | -0.8pp | 11th | 81% below peers | ||
| Lancaster, PA | 27.8% | 27th | -7.4pp | 12th | 81% above peers | ||
| Bozeman, MT | 7.1% | 8th | -1.4pp | 13th | 54% below peers | ||
| Gardena, CA | 16.2% | 17th | -2.9pp | 14th | 5% above peers | ||
| Terre Haute, IN | 28.9% | 28th | -3.4pp | 15th | 88% above peers | ||
| Pocatello, ID | 18.0% | 19th | -1.9pp | 16th | 17% above peers | ||
| Sarasota, FL | 27.2% | 26th | -2.3pp | 17th | 77% above peers | ||
| Youngstown, OH | 52.8% | 30th | -3.5pp | 18th | 243% above peers | ||
| Springfield, OH | 32.5% | 29th | -0.1pp | 19th | 112% above peers | ||
| Santee, CA | 9.1% | 10th | +0.1pp | 20th | 41% below peers | ||
| Mayagüez zona urbana, PR | 74.2% | 31st | +1.3pp | 21st | 382% above peers | ||
| Midwest City, OK | 23.6% | 25th | +0.9pp | 22nd | 53% above peers | ||
| San Rafael, CA | 18.6% | 22nd | +1.0pp | 23rd | 21% above peers | ||
| Pico Rivera, CA | 12.3% | 12th | +1.4pp | 24th | 20% below peers | ||
| Bowie, MD | 2.8% | 1st | +0.4pp | 25th | 82% below peers | ||
| Casper, WY | 14.1% | 14th | +2.3pp | 26th | 8% below peers | ||
| Lacey, WA | 16.8% | 18th | +4.4pp | 27th | 9% above peers | ||
| Coconut Creek, FL | 14.2% | 15th | +5.0pp | 28th | 8% below peers | ||
| The Hammocks, FL | 18.5% | 21st | +6.5pp | 29th | 20% above peers | ||
| Towson, MD | 7.3% | 9th | +3.1pp | 30th | 52% below peers | ||
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | 22.3% | 24th | +11.5pp | 31st | 45% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Broadband rose 10.8 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 80.7% to 91.5% - more than the combined survey margin (±3.7pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 89.0% | +10.0pp | |||||
| United States ref | 91.1% | ||||||
| Mayagüez zona urbana, PR | 85.1% | 29th | +18.3pp | 1st | 8% below peers | ||
| Lancaster, PA | 90.5% | 22nd | +14.7pp | 2nd | 2% below peers | ||
| Youngstown, OH | 82.0% | 31st | +12.2pp | 3rd | 11% below peers | ||
| Decatur, AL | 86.7% | 28th | +12.6pp | 4th | 6% below peers | ||
| Gardena, CA | 93.8% | 12th | +12.6pp | 5th | 2% above peers | ||
| Pico Rivera, CA | 91.3% | 20th | +11.3pp | 6th | 1% below peers | ||
| The Hammocks, FL | 97.5% | 2nd | +11.7pp | 7th | 6% above peers | ||
| Midwest City, OK | 91.5% | 19th | +10.8pp | 8th | 1% below peers | ||
| Des Plaines, IL | 94.2% | 10th | +10.3pp | 9th | 2% above peers | ||
| Carson City, NV | 92.2% | 16th | +9.6pp | 10th | on par with peers | ||
| Bradenton, FL | 89.3% | 25th | +8.9pp | 11th | 3% below peers | ||
| Springfield, OH | 88.4% | 26th | +8.7pp | 12th | 4% below peers | ||
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | 92.2% | 18th | +9.0pp | 13th | on par with peers | ||
| Casper, WY | 92.4% | 15th | +8.0pp | 14th | on par with peers | ||
| Dubuque, IA | 89.5% | 24th | +7.6pp | 15th | 3% below peers | ||
| Sarasota, FL | 90.3% | 23rd | +6.9pp | 16th | 2% below peers | ||
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | 90.5% | 21st | +6.2pp | 17th | 2% below peers | ||
| San Rafael, CA | 94.7% | 9th | +5.6pp | 18th | 3% above peers | ||
| Coconut Creek, FL | 92.6% | 13th | +5.4pp | 19th | on par with peers | ||
| Lacey, WA | 94.0% | 11th | +4.2pp | 20th | 2% above peers | ||
| Severn, MD | 97.5% | 3rd | +4.3pp | 21st | 6% above peers | ||
| Bel Air South, MD | 95.0% | 8th | +4.2pp | 22nd | 3% above peers | ||
| Wake Forest, NC | 98.1% | 1st | +4.3pp | 23rd | 6% above peers | ||
| Santee, CA | 95.3% | 7th | +3.8pp | 24th | 3% above peers | ||
| Pocatello, ID | 88.4% | 27th | +3.1pp | 25th | 4% below peers | ||
| Bozeman, MT | 92.2% | 17th | +3.1pp | 26th | on par with peers | ||
| Terre Haute, IN | 83.3% | 30th | +2.7pp | 27th | 10% below peers | ||
| Cupertino, CA | 96.7% | 5th | +3.0pp | 28th | 5% above peers | ||
| Bowie, MD | 97.3% | 4th | +2.4pp | 29th | 6% above peers | ||
| Towson, MD | 92.4% | 14th | +2.3pp | 30th | on par with peers | ||
| Hoboken, NJ | 96.1% | 6th | +2.0pp | 31st | 4% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin, in the wrong direction for this metric.
Inequality rose about 7% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 0.41 to 0.44 - more than the combined survey margin (±0.03). That is movement in the wrong direction.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 0.47 | -0.002 | |||||
| United States ref | 0.48 | +0.001 | |||||
| Bel Air South, MD | 0.38 | 4th | -0.041 | 1st | 15% below peers | ||
| Des Plaines, IL | 0.41 | 6th | -0.023 | 2nd | 10% below peers | ||
| Decatur, AL | 0.45 | 17th | -0.025 | 3rd | on par with peers | ||
| Mayagüez zona urbana, PR | 0.62 | 31st | -0.021 | 4th | 36% above peers | ||
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | 0.43 | 10th | -0.015 | 5th | 5% below peers | ||
| Youngstown, OH | 0.48 | 24th | -0.015 | 6th | 5% above peers | ||
| Gardena, CA | 0.43 | 9th | -0.012 | 7th | 5% below peers | ||
| Pocatello, ID | 0.45 | 14th | -0.010 | 8th | 1% below peers | ||
| Lacey, WA | 0.38 | 3rd | -0.005 | 9th | 16% below peers | ||
| Carson City, NV | 0.45 | 19th | -0.001 | 10th | on par with peers | ||
| Lancaster, PA | 0.44 | 12th | +0.003 | 11th | 2% below peers | ||
| Hoboken, NJ | 0.47 | 23rd | +0.003 | 12th | 3% above peers | ||
| Wake Forest, NC | 0.39 | 5th | +0.003 | 13th | 13% below peers | ||
| Springfield, OH | 0.45 | 18th | +0.006 | 14th | on par with peers | ||
| Terre Haute, IN | 0.49 | 26th | +0.006 | 15th | 7% above peers | ||
| Dubuque, IA | 0.45 | 16th | +0.007 | 16th | on par with peers | ||
| The Hammocks, FL | 0.42 | 8th | +0.007 | 17th | 7% below peers | ||
| Bradenton, FL | 0.46 | 20th | +0.008 | 18th | 1% above peers | ||
| Towson, MD | 0.51 | 28th | +0.010 | 19th | 13% above peers | ||
| San Rafael, CA | 0.51 | 27th | +0.012 | 20th | 13% above peers | ||
| Bowie, MD | 0.37 | 2nd | +0.010 | 21st | 18% below peers | ||
| Bozeman, MT | 0.48 | 25th | +0.013 | 22nd | 7% above peers | ||
| Severn, MD | 0.37 | 1st | +0.011 | 23rd | 18% below peers | ||
| Cupertino, CA | 0.45 | 15th | +0.020 | 24th | on par with peers | ||
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | 0.46 | 21st | +0.021 | 25th | 2% above peers | ||
| Casper, WY | 0.46 | 22nd | +0.030 | 26th | 3% above peers | ||
| Midwest City, OK | 0.44 | 13th | +0.031 | 27th | 2% below peers | ||
| Sarasota, FL | 0.58 | 30th | +0.044 | 28th | 29% above peers | ||
| Santee, CA | 0.41 | 7th | +0.035 | 29th | 9% below peers | ||
| Pico Rivera, CA | 0.44 | 11th | +0.038 | 30th | 3% below peers | ||
| Coconut Creek, FL | 0.52 | 29th | +0.098 | 31st | 14% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
SNAP changed less than the survey can measure between the 2014-2018 and 2019-2023 surveys (13.9% then, 15.3% now; margin ±2.0pp).
| Place | Latest2019-2023 survey | Today's rank | Change2014-2018 → 2019-2023 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 13.6% | +0.5pp | |||||
| United States ref | 11.8% | -0.5pp | |||||
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | 8.7% | 15th | -5.8pp | 1st | 5% below peers | ||
| The Hammocks, FL | 10.9% | 19th | -6.0pp | 2nd | 19% above peers | ||
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | 7.3% | 12th | -2.6pp | 3rd | 20% below peers | ||
| Hoboken, NJ | 4.7% | 4th | -1.5pp | 4th | 48% below peers | ||
| Dubuque, IA | 9.8% | 17th | -2.9pp | 5th | 7% above peers | ||
| Bradenton, FL | 11.5% | 20th | -3.1pp | 6th | 26% above peers | ||
| Sarasota, FL | 9.1% | 16th | -2.4pp | 7th | on par with peers | ||
| Carson City, NV | 10.1% | 18th | -2.3pp | 8th | 11% above peers | ||
| Decatur, AL | 13.5% | 23rd | -3.0pp | 9th | 48% above peers | ||
| Coconut Creek, FL | 7.2% | 11th | -1.1pp | 10th | 21% below peers | ||
| Bozeman, MT | 3.4% | 2nd | -0.5pp | 11th | 63% below peers | ||
| Bel Air South, MD | 5.9% | 6th | -0.6pp | 12th | 35% below peers | ||
| Terre Haute, IN | 16.9% | 26th | -1.3pp | 13th | 86% above peers | ||
| Des Plaines, IL | 8.5% | 13th | -0.6pp | 14th | 6% below peers | ||
| Youngstown, OH | 36.3% | 30th | -2.2pp | 15th | 299% above peers | ||
| Casper, WY | 6.6% | 8th | -0.3pp | 16th | 28% below peers | ||
| Lancaster, PA | 27.1% | 28th | -0.1pp | 17th | 197% above peers | ||
| Towson, MD | 4.5% | 3rd | +0.0pp | 18th | 50% below peers | ||
| Wake Forest, NC | 5.8% | 5th | +0.0pp | 19th | 37% below peers | ||
| Springfield, OH | 28.6% | 29th | +0.9pp | 20th | 215% above peers | ||
| Pocatello, ID | 17.2% | 27th | +0.7pp | 21st | 89% above peers | ||
| Severn, MD | 6.7% | 10th | +0.3pp | 22nd | 26% below peers | ||
| Midwest City, OK | 15.3% | 25th | +1.4pp | 23rd | 68% above peers | ||
| Lacey, WA | 12.1% | 22nd | +1.2pp | 24th | 33% above peers | ||
| Mayagüez zona urbana, PR | 52.5% | 31st | +9.2pp | 25th | 477% above peers | ||
| San Rafael, CA | 6.5% | 7th | +1.7pp | 26th | 29% below peers | ||
| Pico Rivera, CA | 14.3% | 24th | +5.1pp | 27th | 57% above peers | ||
| Gardena, CA | 11.9% | 21st | +4.4pp | 28th | 31% above peers | ||
| Santee, CA | 8.6% | 14th | +3.4pp | 29th | 6% below peers | ||
| Bowie, MD | 6.7% | 9th | +2.7pp | 30th | 26% below peers | ||
| Cupertino, CA | 1.7% | 1st | +1.5pp | 31st | 81% below peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers.
Home value rose about 1% over the 12 months ending August 2026, slower than 58% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | $223,261 (Aug 26) | +2.8% | ||||
| United States ref | $368,697 (Aug 26) | +1.2% | ||||
| Youngstown, OH | $73,589 (Aug 26) | 27th | +7.4% | 1st | 84% below peers | |
| Des Plaines, IL | $358,473 (Aug 26) | 17th | +6.9% | 2nd | 24% below peers | |
| Hoboken, NJ | $883,427 (Aug 26) | 3rd | +4.5% | 3rd | 86% above peers | |
| Dubuque, IA | $250,358 (Aug 26) | 22nd | +4.5% | 4th | 47% below peers | |
| Springfield, OH | $189,587 (Aug 26) | 24th | +3.7% | 5th | 60% below peers | |
| Cupertino, CA | $2,965,725 (Aug 26) | 1st | +3.3% | 6th | 525% above peers | |
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | $607,048 (Aug 26) | 8th | +3.1% | 7th | 28% above peers | |
| Towson, MD | $474,404 (Aug 26) | 14th | +2.6% | 8th | on par with peers | |
| San Rafael, CA | $1,298,041 (Aug 26) | 2nd | +2.5% | 9th | 174% above peers | |
| Gardena, CA | $779,150 (Aug 26) | 5th | +2.3% | 10th | 64% above peers | |
| Casper, WY | $313,856 (Aug 26) | 20th | +1.8% | 11th | 34% below peers | |
| Pocatello, ID | $343,159 (Aug 26) | 19th | +1.6% | 12th | 28% below peers | |
| Severn, MD | $517,542 (Aug 26) | 11th | +1.3% | 13th | 9% above peers | |
| Terre Haute, IN | $162,375 (Aug 26) | 26th | +1.0% | 14th | 66% below peers | |
| Pico Rivera, CA | $747,422 (Aug 26) | 6th | +1.0% | 15th | 58% above peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | $170,640 (Aug 26) | 25th | +0.7% | 16th | 64% below peers | |
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | $462,037 (Aug 26) | 15th | +0.4% | 17th | 3% below peers | |
| Bozeman, MT | $725,769 (Aug 26) | 7th | +0.4% | 18th | 53% above peers | |
| Lacey, WA | $509,747 (Aug 26) | 12th | +0.2% | 19th | 7% above peers | |
| The Hammocks, FL | $534,688 (Aug 26) | 9th | -0.2% | 20th | 13% above peers | |
| Bowie, MD | $520,578 (Aug 26) | 10th | -0.4% | 21st | 10% above peers | |
| Wake Forest, NC | $507,240 (Aug 26) | 13th | -1.0% | 22nd | 7% above peers | |
| Decatur, AL | $223,248 (Aug 26) | 23rd | -1.1% | 23rd | 53% below peers | |
| Santee, CA | $795,470 (Aug 26) | 4th | -1.5% | 24th | 68% above peers | |
| Sarasota, FL | $409,878 (Aug 26) | 16th | -2.7% | 25th | 14% below peers | |
| Bradenton, FL | $352,501 (Aug 26) | 18th | -3.2% | 26th | 26% below peers | |
| Coconut Creek, FL | $278,815 (Aug 26) | 21st | -6.4% | 27th | 41% below peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers.
Starter homes rose about 2% over the 12 months ending August 2026, faster than 65% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | $120,549 (Aug 26) | +4.2% | ||||
| United States ref | $200,550 (Aug 26) | +2.2% | ||||
| Youngstown, OH | $43,239 (Aug 26) | 27th | +12.8% | 1st | 87% below peers | |
| Hoboken, NJ | $596,747 (Aug 26) | 6th | +8.4% | 2nd | 78% above peers | |
| Des Plaines, IL | $245,871 (Aug 26) | 18th | +4.0% | 3rd | 27% below peers | |
| Springfield, OH | $104,091 (Aug 26) | 25th | +3.9% | 4th | 69% below peers | |
| Pocatello, ID | $259,905 (Aug 26) | 16th | +3.0% | 5th | 23% below peers | |
| Dubuque, IA | $169,835 (Aug 26) | 21st | +3.0% | 6th | 49% below peers | |
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | $449,366 (Aug 26) | 8th | +2.9% | 7th | 34% above peers | |
| Casper, WY | $224,668 (Aug 26) | 19th | +2.6% | 8th | 33% below peers | |
| Gardena, CA | $642,831 (Aug 26) | 4th | +1.9% | 9th | 91% above peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | $123,280 (Aug 26) | 24th | +1.9% | 10th | 63% below peers | |
| San Rafael, CA | $798,125 (Aug 26) | 2nd | +1.7% | 11th | 138% above peers | |
| Pico Rivera, CA | $676,538 (Aug 26) | 3rd | +1.6% | 12th | 102% above peers | |
| Severn, MD | $384,636 (Aug 26) | 11th | +1.3% | 13th | 15% above peers | |
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | $335,700 (Aug 26) | 14th | +1.2% | 14th | on par with peers | |
| Cupertino, CA | $1,732,125 (Aug 26) | 1st | +1.1% | 15th | 416% above peers | |
| Lacey, WA | $433,708 (Aug 26) | 9th | +0.9% | 16th | 29% above peers | |
| Towson, MD | $310,817 (Aug 26) | 15th | +0.7% | 17th | 7% below peers | |
| Bowie, MD | $418,752 (Aug 26) | 10th | +0.2% | 18th | 25% above peers | |
| Santee, CA | $612,274 (Aug 26) | 5th | -0.3% | 19th | 82% above peers | |
| Decatur, AL | $139,417 (Aug 26) | 23rd | -0.9% | 20th | 58% below peers | |
| Bozeman, MT | $489,422 (Aug 26) | 7th | -1.4% | 21st | 46% above peers | |
| Wake Forest, NC | $357,564 (Aug 26) | 12th | -1.8% | 22nd | 7% above peers | |
| The Hammocks, FL | $348,285 (Aug 26) | 13th | -2.4% | 23rd | 4% above peers | |
| Terre Haute, IN | $93,084 (Aug 26) | 26th | -3.0% | 24th | 72% below peers | |
| Sarasota, FL | $259,750 (Aug 26) | 17th | -4.1% | 25th | 23% below peers | |
| Bradenton, FL | $206,790 (Aug 26) | 20th | -5.4% | 26th | 38% below peers | |
| Coconut Creek, FL | $167,596 (Aug 26) | 22nd | -8.2% | 27th | 50% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Homeownership changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (56.6% then, 58.1% now; margin ±3.3pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 65.8% | +0.2pp | |||||
| United States ref | 65.2% | ||||||
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | 59.5% | 17th | +7.3pp | 1st | 2% below peers | ||
| Lancaster, PA | 48.6% | 28th | +5.1pp | 2nd | 20% below peers | ||
| Carson City, NV | 62.3% | 15th | +5.6pp | 3rd | 3% above peers | ||
| Casper, WY | 69.8% | 9th | +5.5pp | 4th | 15% above peers | ||
| Springfield, OH | 52.4% | 25th | +3.7pp | 5th | 14% below peers | ||
| The Hammocks, FL | 62.7% | 14th | +4.0pp | 6th | 3% above peers | ||
| San Rafael, CA | 53.0% | 24th | +3.0pp | 7th | 13% below peers | ||
| Bel Air South, MD | 81.9% | 2nd | +4.1pp | 8th | 35% above peers | ||
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | 73.2% | 5th | +2.8pp | 9th | 21% above peers | ||
| Wake Forest, NC | 74.0% | 4th | +2.6pp | 10th | 22% above peers | ||
| Bozeman, MT | 44.7% | 30th | +1.6pp | 11th | 26% below peers | ||
| Des Plaines, IL | 78.3% | 3rd | +2.7pp | 12th | 29% above peers | ||
| Pico Rivera, CA | 70.5% | 8th | +2.3pp | 13th | 16% above peers | ||
| Pocatello, ID | 64.5% | 12th | +1.9pp | 14th | 6% above peers | ||
| Hoboken, NJ | 33.8% | 31st | +0.9pp | 15th | 44% below peers | ||
| Midwest City, OK | 58.1% | 18th | +1.6pp | 16th | 4% below peers | ||
| Dubuque, IA | 65.8% | 10th | +1.7pp | 17th | 9% above peers | ||
| Youngstown, OH | 56.2% | 20th | +1.2pp | 18th | 7% below peers | ||
| Gardena, CA | 48.8% | 27th | +0.9pp | 19th | 19% below peers | ||
| Bowie, MD | 83.9% | 1st | +1.3pp | 20th | 38% above peers | ||
| Lacey, WA | 55.9% | 22nd | +0.6pp | 21st | 8% below peers | ||
| Santee, CA | 72.4% | 6th | +0.6pp | 22nd | 19% above peers | ||
| Cupertino, CA | 60.6% | 16th | +0.4pp | 23rd | on par with peers | ||
| Severn, MD | 71.0% | 7th | +0.3pp | 24th | 17% above peers | ||
| Sarasota, FL | 57.5% | 19th | -0.1pp | 25th | 5% below peers | ||
| Coconut Creek, FL | 64.8% | 11th | -0.3pp | 26th | 7% above peers | ||
| Decatur, AL | 63.3% | 13th | -0.4pp | 27th | 4% above peers | ||
| Terre Haute, IN | 52.2% | 26th | -0.5pp | 28th | 14% below peers | ||
| Bradenton, FL | 56.0% | 21st | -1.6pp | 29th | 8% below peers | ||
| Towson, MD | 55.6% | 23rd | -1.8pp | 30th | 8% below peers | ||
| Mayagüez zona urbana, PR | 45.2% | 29th | -8.0pp | 31st | 25% below peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers.
Rent rose about 2% over the 12 months ending August 2026, slower than 63% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States ref | $1,948 (Aug 26) | +2.5% | ||||
| Youngstown, OH | $1,059 (Aug 26) | 27th | +8.4% | 1st | 49% below peers | |
| Springfield, OH | $1,251 (Aug 26) | 22nd | +8.3% | 2nd | 39% below peers | |
| Cupertino, CA | $4,375 (Aug 26) | 1st | +8.0% | 3rd | 113% above peers | |
| Des Plaines, IL | $2,058 (Aug 26) | 14th | +5.6% | 4th | on par with peers | |
| San Rafael, CA | $3,182 (Aug 26) | 3rd | +4.4% | 5th | 55% above peers | |
| Gardena, CA | $2,354 (Aug 26) | 8th | +4.3% | 6th | 14% above peers | |
| Hoboken, NJ | $3,989 (Aug 26) | 2nd | +4.1% | 7th | 94% above peers | |
| Lancaster, PA | $1,547 (Aug 26) | 20th | +3.9% | 8th | 25% below peers | |
| Bozeman, MT | $2,149 (Aug 26) | 12th | +3.8% | 9th | 4% above peers | |
| Wake Forest, NC | $1,823 (Aug 26) | 17th | +3.6% | 10th | 11% below peers | |
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | $1,861 (Aug 26) | 16th | +3.5% | 11th | 10% below peers | |
| Terre Haute, IN | $996 (Aug 26) | 28th | +3.3% | 12th | 52% below peers | |
| Dubuque, IA | $1,076 (Aug 26) | 25th | +3.1% | 13th | 48% below peers | |
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | $1,694 (Aug 26) | 19th | +3.0% | 14th | 18% below peers | |
| Pico Rivera, CA | $2,266 (Aug 26) | 10th | +2.7% | 15th | 10% above peers | |
| Coconut Creek, FL | $2,392 (Aug 26) | 7th | +2.3% | 16th | 16% above peers | |
| Santee, CA | $2,850 (Aug 26) | 4th | +2.3% | 17th | 38% above peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | $1,202 (Aug 26) | 23rd | +1.8% | 18th | 42% below peers | |
| Decatur, AL | $1,118 (Aug 26) | 24th | +1.8% | 19th | 46% below peers | |
| Towson, MD | $1,872 (Aug 26) | 15th | +1.6% | 20th | 9% below peers | |
| Casper, WY | $1,393 (Aug 26) | 21st | +1.5% | 21st | 32% below peers | |
| Lacey, WA | $2,137 (Aug 26) | 13th | +0.8% | 22nd | 4% above peers | |
| Pocatello, ID | $1,074 (Aug 26) | 26th | +0.8% | 23rd | 48% below peers | |
| Bowie, MD | $2,522 (Aug 26) | 5th | +0.5% | 24th | 23% above peers | |
| The Hammocks, FL | $2,484 (Aug 26) | 6th | +0.5% | 25th | 21% above peers | |
| Severn, MD | $2,336 (Aug 26) | 9th | +0.2% | 26th | 14% above peers | |
| Sarasota, FL | $2,175 (Aug 26) | 11th | -0.2% | 27th | 6% above peers | |
| Bradenton, FL | $1,782 (Aug 26) | 18th | -1.9% | 28th | 13% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is within the margin, but each of the last 4 annual releases moved the 5-year average the same way. Direction is a reliable early signal; its size is not.
Cost burden changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (29.0% then, 31.6% now; margin ±3.5pp). The newest releases lean upward: each of the last 4 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 27.3% | +1.4pp | |||||
| United States ref | 32.2% | +0.4pp | |||||
| Des Plaines, IL | 27.9% | 8th | -5.9pp | 1st | 20% below peers | ||
| Bowie, MD | 26.8% | 4th | -2.1pp | 2nd | 23% below peers | ||
| Severn, MD | 28.7% | 11th | -1.6pp | 3rd | 18% below peers | ||
| Cupertino, CA | 27.5% | 6th | -1.4pp | 4th | 21% below peers | ||
| Bozeman, MT | 39.2% | 22nd | -1.9pp | 5th | 12% above peers | ||
| Gardena, CA | 44.2% | 29th | -2.0pp | 6th | 27% above peers | ||
| Bel Air South, MD | 22.8% | 2nd | -1.0pp | 7th | 35% below peers | ||
| Carson City, NV | 32.0% | 15th | -0.7pp | 8th | 8% below peers | ||
| Casper, WY | 26.7% | 3rd | -0.2pp | 9th | 23% below peers | ||
| Wake Forest, NC | 22.5% | 1st | +0.0pp | 10th | 36% below peers | ||
| Mayagüez zona urbana, PR | 35.6% | 17th | +0.5pp | 11th | 2% above peers | ||
| Lancaster, PA | 36.1% | 18th | +0.5pp | 12th | 4% above peers | ||
| San Rafael, CA | 43.9% | 27th | +0.7pp | 13th | 26% above peers | ||
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | 31.5% | 12th | +0.5pp | 14th | 10% below peers | ||
| Pico Rivera, CA | 41.2% | 25th | +0.8pp | 15th | 18% above peers | ||
| Dubuque, IA | 28.2% | 9th | +0.6pp | 16th | 19% below peers | ||
| Springfield, OH | 31.7% | 14th | +0.8pp | 17th | 9% below peers | ||
| Youngstown, OH | 36.6% | 19th | +1.4pp | 18th | 5% above peers | ||
| Santee, CA | 39.0% | 21st | +1.6pp | 19th | 12% above peers | ||
| The Hammocks, FL | 48.5% | 31st | +2.2pp | 20th | 39% above peers | ||
| Pocatello, ID | 27.8% | 7th | +1.3pp | 21st | 20% below peers | ||
| Lacey, WA | 39.3% | 23rd | +2.5pp | 22nd | 13% above peers | ||
| Hoboken, NJ | 28.7% | 10th | +1.9pp | 23rd | 18% below peers | ||
| Sarasota, FL | 43.4% | 26th | +2.9pp | 24th | 25% above peers | ||
| Midwest City, OK | 31.6% | 13th | +2.6pp | 25th | 9% below peers | ||
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | 37.5% | 20th | +3.3pp | 26th | 8% above peers | ||
| Decatur, AL | 26.9% | 5th | +2.4pp | 27th | 23% below peers | ||
| Terre Haute, IN | 39.6% | 24th | +3.7pp | 28th | 14% above peers | ||
| Towson, MD | 34.8% | 16th | +3.6pp | 29th | on par with peers | ||
| Bradenton, FL | 44.1% | 28th | +5.6pp | 30th | 27% above peers | ||
| Coconut Creek, FL | 47.7% | 30th | +6.8pp | 31st | 37% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
No vehicle changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (5.8% then, 5.6% now; margin ±1.6pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 5.6% | +0.1pp | |||||
| United States ref | 8.3% | -0.3pp | |||||
| Bel Air South, MD | 4.3% | 8th | -2.2pp | 1st | 26% below peers | ||
| Bowie, MD | 2.5% | 1st | -1.2pp | 2nd | 58% below peers | ||
| Lancaster, PA | 14.9% | 28th | -5.8pp | 3rd | 156% above peers | ||
| Sarasota, FL | 6.7% | 19th | -2.2pp | 4th | 15% above peers | ||
| Gardena, CA | 5.2% | 10th | -1.6pp | 5th | 11% below peers | ||
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | 5.3% | 12th | -1.3pp | 6th | 9% below peers | ||
| Bozeman, MT | 3.9% | 6th | -0.9pp | 7th | 33% below peers | ||
| Cupertino, CA | 3.8% | 5th | -0.8pp | 8th | 36% below peers | ||
| Mayagüez zona urbana, PR | 19.0% | 30th | -4.0pp | 9th | 226% above peers | ||
| Decatur, AL | 5.8% | 17th | -1.0pp | 10th | on par with peers | ||
| Bradenton, FL | 6.7% | 20th | -1.1pp | 11th | 15% above peers | ||
| Terre Haute, IN | 10.7% | 26th | -1.2pp | 12th | 83% above peers | ||
| Hoboken, NJ | 33.9% | 31st | -1.8pp | 13th | 482% above peers | ||
| Lacey, WA | 6.0% | 18th | -0.3pp | 14th | 3% above peers | ||
| Dubuque, IA | 8.1% | 23rd | -0.3pp | 15th | 39% above peers | ||
| Midwest City, OK | 5.6% | 14th | -0.2pp | 16th | 3% below peers | ||
| Pocatello, ID | 5.8% | 15th | -0.2pp | 17th | 1% below peers | ||
| Springfield, OH | 12.5% | 27th | -0.3pp | 18th | 115% above peers | ||
| Youngstown, OH | 16.8% | 29th | -0.1pp | 19th | 188% above peers | ||
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | 4.0% | 7th | -0.0pp | 20th | 32% below peers | ||
| Des Plaines, IL | 5.4% | 13th | -0.0pp | 21st | 7% below peers | ||
| Towson, MD | 8.9% | 25th | +0.6pp | 22nd | 54% above peers | ||
| Santee, CA | 4.3% | 9th | +0.3pp | 23rd | 26% below peers | ||
| Coconut Creek, FL | 5.8% | 16th | +0.5pp | 24th | on par with peers | ||
| Wake Forest, NC | 3.2% | 2nd | +0.4pp | 25th | 46% below peers | ||
| Casper, WY | 5.2% | 11th | +0.8pp | 26th | 10% below peers | ||
| Carson City, NV | 6.8% | 21st | +1.1pp | 27th | 17% above peers | ||
| San Rafael, CA | 8.7% | 24th | +1.8pp | 28th | 49% above peers | ||
| Pico Rivera, CA | 7.4% | 22nd | +1.6pp | 29th | 27% above peers | ||
| Severn, MD | 3.6% | 4th | +0.8pp | 30th | 37% below peers | ||
| The Hammocks, FL | 3.5% | 3rd | +1.2pp | 31st | 39% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Uninsured fell 2.0 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 12.4% to 10.4% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.4pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 12.9% | -1.2pp | |||||
| United States ref | 8.4% | -0.4pp | |||||
| Mayagüez zona urbana, PR | 3.5% | 6th | -2.1pp | 1st | 53% below peers | ||
| The Hammocks, FL | 8.8% | 21st | -5.0pp | 2nd | 20% above peers | ||
| Santee, CA | 3.1% | 4th | -1.3pp | 3rd | 57% below peers | ||
| Pocatello, ID | 6.9% | 14th | -2.5pp | 4th | 6% below peers | ||
| Bozeman, MT | 6.3% | 11th | -2.2pp | 5th | 15% below peers | ||
| Bel Air South, MD | 2.5% | 2nd | -0.9pp | 6th | 66% below peers | ||
| Coconut Creek, FL | 10.4% | 25th | -2.8pp | 7th | 41% above peers | ||
| Gardena, CA | 8.5% | 19th | -2.2pp | 8th | 16% above peers | ||
| Dubuque, IA | 3.9% | 7th | -1.0pp | 9th | 47% below peers | ||
| Casper, WY | 10.9% | 27th | -2.6pp | 10th | 49% above peers | ||
| Cupertino, CA | 1.8% | 1st | -0.4pp | 11th | 75% below peers | ||
| Midwest City, OK | 10.4% | 26th | -1.9pp | 12th | 42% above peers | ||
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | 9.3% | 23rd | -1.1pp | 13th | 27% above peers | ||
| Sarasota, FL | 15.6% | 31st | -1.6pp | 14th | 113% above peers | ||
| Lancaster, PA | 7.3% | 16th | -0.7pp | 15th | on par with peers | ||
| Des Plaines, IL | 8.1% | 17th | -0.8pp | 16th | 10% above peers | ||
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | 8.6% | 20th | -0.8pp | 17th | 17% above peers | ||
| Towson, MD | 2.5% | 3rd | -0.1pp | 18th | 65% below peers | ||
| Pico Rivera, CA | 8.9% | 22nd | -0.3pp | 19th | 21% above peers | ||
| San Rafael, CA | 6.7% | 13th | -0.1pp | 20th | 8% below peers | ||
| Bradenton, FL | 15.2% | 30th | +0.0pp | 21st | 107% above peers | ||
| Youngstown, OH | 6.9% | 15th | +0.2pp | 22nd | 5% below peers | ||
| Bowie, MD | 3.9% | 8th | +0.2pp | 23rd | 47% below peers | ||
| Carson City, NV | 11.2% | 28th | +0.6pp | 24th | 52% above peers | ||
| Terre Haute, IN | 9.6% | 24th | +0.7pp | 25th | 31% above peers | ||
| Springfield, OH | 8.3% | 18th | +0.6pp | 26th | 13% above peers | ||
| Wake Forest, NC | 4.7% | 9th | +0.7pp | 27th | 36% below peers | ||
| Decatur, AL | 13.2% | 29th | +2.5pp | 28th | 81% above peers | ||
| Hoboken, NJ | 3.2% | 5th | +1.0pp | 29th | 56% below peers | ||
| Lacey, WA | 5.8% | 10th | +1.8pp | 30th | 22% below peers | ||
| Severn, MD | 6.6% | 12th | +2.9pp | 31st | 10% below peers |
Modeled estimate with no usable trend; the level is shown and no trend claims are made.
Adult obesity is about a quarter above the peer median.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 40.3% | |||
| United States ref | 33.4% | |||
| Cupertino, CA | 15.6% | 1st | 54% below peers | |
| Bozeman, MT | 24.1% | 2nd | 29% below peers | |
| San Rafael, CA | 25.7% | 3rd | 24% below peers | |
| Wake Forest, NC | 25.8% | 4th | 24% below peers | |
| Gardena, CA | 26.0% | 5th | 23% below peers | |
| Hoboken, NJ | 26.1% | 6th | 23% below peers | |
| Santee, CA | 26.2% | 7th | 23% below peers | |
| The Hammocks, FL | 28.3% | 8th | 17% below peers | |
| Des Plaines, IL | 28.9% | 9th | 15% below peers | |
| Pico Rivera, CA | 29.9% | 10th | 12% below peers | |
| Coconut Creek, FL | 29.9% | 11th | 12% below peers | |
| Sarasota, FL | 31.1% | 12th | 8% below peers | |
| Towson, MD | 31.2% | 13th | 8% below peers | |
| Bowie, MD | 32.5% | 14th | 4% below peers | |
| Carson City, NV | 32.8% | 15th | 3% below peers | |
| Bel Air South, MD | 33.9% | 16th | on par with peers | |
| Lacey, WA | 34.3% | 17th | 1% above peers | |
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | 34.8% | 18th | 3% above peers | |
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | 35.0% | 19th | 3% above peers | |
| Severn, MD | 35.3% | 20th | 4% above peers | |
| Bradenton, FL | 36.0% | 21st | 6% above peers | |
| Casper, WY | 36.9% | 22nd | 9% above peers | |
| Pocatello, ID | 37.1% | 23rd | 9% above peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 40.8% | 24th | 20% above peers | |
| Lancaster, PA | 40.8% | 25th | 20% above peers | |
| Decatur, AL | 40.8% | 26th | 20% above peers | |
| Dubuque, IA | 41.3% | 27th | 22% above peers | |
| Terre Haute, IN | 42.6% | 28th | 26% above peers | |
| Springfield, OH | 45.5% | 29th | 34% above peers | |
| Youngstown, OH | 47.9% | 30th | 41% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin, in the wrong direction for this metric.
Child uninsured rose 2.1 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 5.2% to 7.4% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.1pp). That is movement in the wrong direction.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 8.2% | +0.2pp | |||||
| United States ref | 5.5% | +0.4pp | |||||
| Mayagüez zona urbana, PR | 0.6% | 1st | -3.2pp | 1st | 82% below peers | ||
| Bozeman, MT | 3.0% | 15th | -5.8pp | 2nd | 5% below peers | ||
| Dubuque, IA | 1.7% | 4th | -2.2pp | 3rd | 48% below peers | ||
| Gardena, CA | 2.9% | 13th | -3.7pp | 4th | 11% below peers | ||
| Severn, MD | 1.4% | 3rd | -1.6pp | 5th | 55% below peers | ||
| San Rafael, CA | 1.8% | 6th | -1.0pp | 6th | 45% below peers | ||
| Casper, WY | 6.1% | 23rd | -3.0pp | 7th | 92% above peers | ||
| The Hammocks, FL | 4.9% | 20th | -2.1pp | 8th | 55% above peers | ||
| Santee, CA | 1.7% | 5th | -0.7pp | 9th | 48% below peers | ||
| Coconut Creek, FL | 8.9% | 30th | -3.1pp | 10th | 179% above peers | ||
| Lancaster, PA | 3.2% | 16th | -0.7pp | 11th | on par with peers | ||
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | 7.4% | 26th | -1.1pp | 12th | 132% above peers | ||
| Carson City, NV | 7.6% | 27th | -0.7pp | 13th | 139% above peers | ||
| Pocatello, ID | 2.7% | 11th | +0.0pp | 14th | 16% below peers | ||
| Pico Rivera, CA | 2.6% | 9th | +0.0pp | 15th | 19% below peers | ||
| Bradenton, FL | 8.6% | 29th | +0.6pp | 16th | 170% above peers | ||
| Springfield, OH | 5.3% | 22nd | +0.4pp | 17th | 68% above peers | ||
| Bel Air South, MD | 2.9% | 14th | +0.3pp | 18th | 10% below peers | ||
| Towson, MD | 2.2% | 7th | +0.3pp | 19th | 32% below peers | ||
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | 5.1% | 21st | +0.8pp | 20th | 59% above peers | ||
| Decatur, AL | 7.0% | 24th | +1.9pp | 21st | 119% above peers | ||
| Midwest City, OK | 7.4% | 25th | +2.2pp | 22nd | 131% above peers | ||
| Bowie, MD | 2.7% | 12th | +0.8pp | 23rd | 15% below peers | ||
| Sarasota, FL | 16.6% | 31st | +5.0pp | 24th | 421% above peers | ||
| Terre Haute, IN | 8.0% | 28th | +3.1pp | 25th | 152% above peers | ||
| Lacey, WA | 3.2% | 17th | +1.4pp | 26th | 1% above peers | ||
| Wake Forest, NC | 2.2% | 8th | +1.0pp | 27th | 29% below peers | ||
| Des Plaines, IL | 4.7% | 19th | +2.1pp | 28th | 46% above peers | ||
| Cupertino, CA | 2.6% | 10th | +1.4pp | 29th | 19% below peers | ||
| Youngstown, OH | 3.4% | 18th | +1.9pp | 30th | 5% above peers | ||
| Hoboken, NJ | 0.9% | 2nd | 71% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
College attainment rose 2.3 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 21.4% to 23.8% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.3pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 28.4% | +2.8pp | |||||
| United States ref | 35.7% | +3.5pp | |||||
| Lancaster, PA | 29.4% | 20th | +6.5pp | 1st | 14% below peers | ||
| Pico Rivera, CA | 16.4% | 29th | +3.4pp | 2nd | 52% below peers | ||
| Casper, WY | 30.5% | 19th | +5.4pp | 3rd | 11% below peers | ||
| Santee, CA | 35.0% | 14th | +5.5pp | 4th | 3% above peers | ||
| Bradenton, FL | 28.3% | 22nd | +4.3pp | 5th | 17% below peers | ||
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | 18.5% | 27th | +2.8pp | 6th | 46% below peers | ||
| Sarasota, FL | 41.8% | 10th | +5.3pp | 7th | 22% above peers | ||
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | 31.2% | 18th | +3.9pp | 8th | 8% below peers | ||
| Gardena, CA | 28.9% | 21st | +3.5pp | 9th | 15% below peers | ||
| Bel Air South, MD | 49.4% | 8th | +6.0pp | 10th | 45% above peers | ||
| Youngstown, OH | 15.5% | 30th | +1.9pp | 11th | 55% below peers | ||
| Coconut Creek, FL | 38.9% | 12th | +4.3pp | 12th | 14% above peers | ||
| Springfield, OH | 16.8% | 28th | +1.8pp | 13th | 51% below peers | ||
| Midwest City, OK | 23.8% | 24th | +2.3pp | 14th | 30% below peers | ||
| Bozeman, MT | 65.1% | 4th | +6.4pp | 15th | 91% above peers | ||
| Dubuque, IA | 34.0% | 16th | +2.9pp | 16th | on par with peers | ||
| Wake Forest, NC | 59.5% | 5th | +4.9pp | 17th | 75% above peers | ||
| Terre Haute, IN | 24.6% | 23rd | +1.9pp | 18th | 28% below peers | ||
| Pocatello, ID | 32.6% | 17th | +2.3pp | 19th | 4% below peers | ||
| Carson City, NV | 23.7% | 25th | +1.6pp | 20th | 30% below peers | ||
| Towson, MD | 69.3% | 3rd | +4.2pp | 21st | 103% above peers | ||
| Severn, MD | 46.1% | 9th | +2.6pp | 22nd | 35% above peers | ||
| Bowie, MD | 50.4% | 6th | +2.2pp | 23rd | 48% above peers | ||
| Cupertino, CA | 82.2% | 2nd | +3.5pp | 24th | 141% above peers | ||
| The Hammocks, FL | 37.9% | 13th | +1.5pp | 25th | 11% above peers | ||
| Hoboken, NJ | 82.6% | 1st | +2.1pp | 26th | 142% above peers | ||
| Des Plaines, IL | 38.9% | 11th | +0.8pp | 27th | 14% above peers | ||
| Lacey, WA | 34.1% | 15th | +0.3pp | 28th | on par with peers | ||
| San Rafael, CA | 49.7% | 7th | -2.5pp | 29th | 46% above peers | ||
| Decatur, AL | 22.4% | 26th | -2.3pp | 30th | 34% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Preschool enrollment changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (44.6% then, 34.1% now; margin ±12.4pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 40.5% | -2.6pp | |||||
| United States ref | 45.5% | ||||||
| Severn, MD | 66.5% | 4th | +33.2pp | 1st | 33% above peers | ||
| Bel Air South, MD | 59.5% | 7th | +26.4pp | 2nd | 19% above peers | ||
| Bradenton, FL | 58.4% | 8th | +20.3pp | 3rd | 17% above peers | ||
| Casper, WY | 55.5% | 10th | +16.8pp | 4th | 11% above peers | ||
| Pico Rivera, CA | 49.9% | 17th | +15.1pp | 5th | on par with peers | ||
| Lacey, WA | 42.4% | 21st | +7.7pp | 6th | 15% below peers | ||
| Pocatello, ID | 38.5% | 25th | +6.6pp | 7th | 23% below peers | ||
| Coconut Creek, FL | 56.7% | 9th | +9.5pp | 8th | 14% above peers | ||
| Bowie, MD | 51.4% | 12th | +8.1pp | 9th | 3% above peers | ||
| Terre Haute, IN | 39.2% | 22nd | +5.7pp | 10th | 21% below peers | ||
| The Hammocks, FL | 68.1% | 3rd | +7.0pp | 11th | 37% above peers | ||
| Hoboken, NJ | 90.4% | 1st | +5.4pp | 12th | 81% above peers | ||
| Towson, MD | 65.7% | 6th | +3.4pp | 13th | 32% above peers | ||
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | 51.3% | 13th | +1.4pp | 14th | 3% above peers | ||
| San Rafael, CA | 65.8% | 5th | -0.2pp | 15th | 32% above peers | ||
| Cupertino, CA | 69.3% | 2nd | -0.4pp | 16th | 39% above peers | ||
| Sarasota, FL | 44.0% | 19th | -1.1pp | 17th | 12% below peers | ||
| Bozeman, MT | 50.9% | 14th | -3.7pp | 18th | 2% above peers | ||
| Gardena, CA | 49.9% | 16th | -4.5pp | 19th | on par with peers | ||
| Springfield, OH | 37.8% | 26th | -4.8pp | 20th | 24% below peers | ||
| Carson City, NV | 39.0% | 23rd | -5.2pp | 21st | 22% below peers | ||
| Wake Forest, NC | 52.6% | 11th | -7.7pp | 22nd | 5% above peers | ||
| Santee, CA | 50.6% | 15th | -12.0pp | 23rd | 2% above peers | ||
| Midwest City, OK | 34.1% | 29th | -10.5pp | 24th | 32% below peers | ||
| Dubuque, IA | 38.9% | 24th | -12.9pp | 25th | 22% below peers | ||
| Lancaster, PA | 37.3% | 27th | -12.7pp | 26th | 25% below peers | ||
| Youngstown, OH | 37.2% | 28th | -15.0pp | 27th | 25% below peers | ||
| Mayagüez zona urbana, PR | 47.6% | 18th | -19.7pp | 28th | 5% below peers | ||
| Decatur, AL | 32.0% | 30th | -14.5pp | 29th | 36% below peers | ||
| Des Plaines, IL | 42.5% | 20th | -20.7pp | 30th | 15% below peers | ||
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | 27.2% | 31st | -14.0pp | 31st | 46% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Disconnected youth changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (14.7% then, 16.4% now; margin ±7.6pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 7.9% | -0.1pp | |||||
| United States ref | 6.9% | +0.3pp | |||||
| Hoboken, NJ | 0.3% | 1st | -5.3pp | 1st | 97% below peers | ||
| Pico Rivera, CA | 4.8% | 10th | -22.4pp | 2nd | 35% below peers | ||
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | 3.3% | 5th | -3.7pp | 3rd | 56% below peers | ||
| Terre Haute, IN | 3.8% | 6th | -1.5pp | 4th | 50% below peers | ||
| Des Plaines, IL | 4.5% | 8th | -1.2pp | 5th | 39% below peers | ||
| Springfield, OH | 7.4% | 16th | -1.8pp | 6th | on par with peers | ||
| Sarasota, FL | 7.6% | 17th | -1.4pp | 7th | 2% above peers | ||
| Lancaster, PA | 5.2% | 11th | -0.8pp | 8th | 30% below peers | ||
| Youngstown, OH | 9.5% | 24th | -0.3pp | 9th | 28% above peers | ||
| Towson, MD | 2.4% | 4th | -0.1pp | 10th | 68% below peers | ||
| Bel Air South, MD | 6.7% | 14th | +0.2pp | 11th | 10% below peers | ||
| San Rafael, CA | 7.8% | 19th | +0.2pp | 12th | 5% above peers | ||
| Bozeman, MT | 1.0% | 2nd | +0.1pp | 13th | 86% below peers | ||
| Dubuque, IA | 4.0% | 7th | +0.3pp | 14th | 46% below peers | ||
| Midwest City, OK | 16.4% | 31st | +1.7pp | 15th | 120% above peers | ||
| Carson City, NV | 11.4% | 27th | +1.3pp | 16th | 54% above peers | ||
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | 6.7% | 15th | +1.5pp | 17th | 10% below peers | ||
| Mayagüez zona urbana, PR | 12.2% | 29th | +3.0pp | 18th | 65% above peers | ||
| Gardena, CA | 6.4% | 13th | +2.2pp | 19th | 13% below peers | ||
| Santee, CA | 8.4% | 22nd | +3.1pp | 20th | 13% above peers | ||
| The Hammocks, FL | 7.7% | 18th | +2.8pp | 21st | 3% above peers | ||
| Bradenton, FL | 11.1% | 25th | +4.1pp | 22nd | 49% above peers | ||
| Bowie, MD | 4.7% | 9th | +1.8pp | 23rd | 37% below peers | ||
| Pocatello, ID | 9.0% | 23rd | +3.5pp | 24th | 22% above peers | ||
| Lacey, WA | 11.8% | 28th | +4.6pp | 25th | 59% above peers | ||
| Coconut Creek, FL | 11.2% | 26th | +4.4pp | 26th | 50% above peers | ||
| Severn, MD | 5.7% | 12th | +2.4pp | 27th | 23% below peers | ||
| Decatur, AL | 12.3% | 30th | +5.9pp | 28th | 65% above peers | ||
| Casper, WY | 8.1% | 20th | +4.3pp | 29th | 9% above peers | ||
| Wake Forest, NC | 8.2% | 21st | +6.7pp | 30th | 10% above peers | ||
| Cupertino, CA | 2.3% | 3rd | +2.1pp | 31st | 69% below peers |
Below the state by 10.2 points in SY2026 (14.8% vs 25.0%). Since SY2017 the city moved -18.7 and the state -13.4, so the city lost 5.3 points of ground (floor 2). Excluded from the change: 2024 (shown on the chart, not used).
Midwest City's public school districts are 10.2 points below Oklahoma (14.8% vs 25.0%, SY2026) and have lost 5.3 points of ground to Oklahoma since 2017. Their own figure moved from 33.5% to 14.8% over that span (down 56% relative to the 2017 level); Oklahoma moved from 38.4% to 25.0%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2017 to 2026 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 25.0% | -13.4 pp | ||||
| Lawton, OK | 16.2% | 7th | -26.4 pp | 9th | 28% below peers | |
| Moore, OK | 28.2% | 3rd | -21.4 pp | 8th | 25% above peers | |
| Norman, OK | 29.5% | 2nd | -20.3 pp | 7th | 31% above peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 25.1% | 4th | -19.8 pp | 6th | 11% above peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 40.3% | 1st | -19.2 pp | 5th | 78% above peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 14.8% | 9th | -18.7 pp | 4th | 35% below peers | |
| Enid, OK | 22.6% | 5th | -16.7 pp | 3rd | on par with peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 16.3% | 6th | -7.1 pp | 2nd | 28% below peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 16.2% | 8th | -5.8 pp | 1st | 28% below peers |
Below the state by 12.6 points in SY2026 (18.4% vs 31.0%). Since SY2017 the city moved -14.6 and the state -9.0, so the city lost 5.6 points of ground (floor 2). Excluded from the change: 2024 (shown on the chart, not used).
Midwest City's public school districts are 12.6 points below Oklahoma (18.4% vs 31.0%, SY2026) and have lost 5.6 points of ground to Oklahoma since 2017. Their own figure moved from 33.0% to 18.4% over that span (down 44% relative to the 2017 level); Oklahoma moved from 40.0% to 31.0%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2017 to 2026 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 31.0% | -9.0 pp | ||||
| Lawton, OK | 20.8% | 8th | -23.1 pp | 9th | 32% below peers | |
| Enid, OK | 30.6% | 5th | -16.4 pp | 8th | on par with peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 46.9% | 1st | -15.2 pp | 7th | 53% above peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 18.4% | 9th | -14.6 pp | 6th | 40% below peers | |
| Norman, OK | 35.3% | 3rd | -14.3 pp | 5th | 15% above peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 31.4% | 4th | -14.1 pp | 4th | 3% above peers | |
| Moore, OK | 36.6% | 2nd | -14.1 pp | 3rd | 20% above peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 21.4% | 7th | -3.4 pp | 2nd | 30% below peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 21.7% | 6th | -2.9 pp | 1st | 29% below peers |
Below the state by 18.5 points in SY2026 (16.4% vs 34.9%). Since SY2017 the city moved -20.3 and the state -8.0, so the city lost 12.3 points of ground (floor 2).
Midwest City's public school districts are 18.5 points below Oklahoma (16.4% vs 34.9%, SY2026) and have lost 12.3 points of ground to Oklahoma since 2017. Their own figure moved from 36.7% to 16.4% over that span (down 55% relative to the 2017 level); Oklahoma moved from 42.9% to 34.9%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2017 to 2026 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 34.9% | -8.0 pp | ||||
| Lawton, OK | 17.0% | 8th | -22.5 pp | 9th | 46% below peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 16.4% | 9th | -20.3 pp | 8th | 48% below peers | |
| Enid, OK | 33.4% | 4th | -16.8 pp | 7th | 5% above peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 31.7% | 5th | -15.9 pp | 6th | on par with peers | |
| Moore, OK | 42.6% | 2nd | -13.8 pp | 5th | 34% above peers | |
| Norman, OK | 40.5% | 3rd | -9.3 pp | 4th | 28% above peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 54.4% | 1st | -7.8 pp | 3rd | 72% above peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 23.2% | 6th | -5.0 pp | 2nd | 27% below peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 22.7% | 7th | -3.8 pp | 1st | 28% below peers |
Below the state by 11.3 points in SY2025 (72.0% vs 83.3%). Since SY2018 the city moved -15.0 and the state -4.6, so the city lost 10.4 points of ground (floor 2).
Midwest City's public school districts are 11.3 points below Oklahoma (72.0% vs 83.3%, SY2025) and have lost 10.4 points of ground to Oklahoma since 2018. Their own figure moved from 87.0% to 72.0% over that span (down 17% relative to the 2018 level); Oklahoma moved from 87.9% to 83.3%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2018 to 2025 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 83.3% | -4.6 pp | ||||
| Midwest City, OK | 72.0% | 9th | -15.0 pp | 9th | 13% below peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 75.6% | 8th | -12.9 pp | 8th | 8% below peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 76.4% | 7th | -9.5 pp | 7th | 7% below peers | |
| Norman, OK | 80.0% | 6th | -9.1 pp | 6th | 3% below peers | |
| Moore, OK | 82.5% | 5th | -7.8 pp | 5th | on par with peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 82.7% | 4th | -6.6 pp | 4th | on par with peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 87.4% | 3rd | -3.8 pp | 3rd | 6% above peers | |
| Enid, OK | 88.7% | 2nd | -1.3 pp | 2nd | 8% above peers | |
| Lawton, OK | 97.0% | 1st | +8.8 pp | 1st | 18% above peers |
Below the state by 8.6 points in SY2026 (13.8% vs 22.4%). Since SY2017 the city moved -15.0 and the state -13.7, so the city lost 1.3 points of ground (floor 2). Excluded from the change: 2024 (shown on the chart, not used).
Midwest City's public school districts are 8.6 points below Oklahoma (13.8% vs 22.4%, SY2026) and have held about even with Oklahoma since 2017. Their own figure moved from 28.8% to 13.8% over that span (down 52% relative to the 2017 level); Oklahoma moved from 36.1% to 22.4%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2017 to 2026 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 22.4% | -13.7 pp | ||||
| Lawton, OK | 13.8% | 8th | -22.9 pp | 9th | 37% below peers | |
| Moore, OK | 28.4% | 2nd | -19.6 pp | 8th | 29% above peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 36.0% | 1st | -17.8 pp | 7th | 64% above peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 13.8% | 9th | -15.0 pp | 6th | 37% below peers | |
| Norman, OK | 28.3% | 3rd | -13.6 pp | 5th | 29% above peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 23.2% | 4th | -13.2 pp | 4th | 5% above peers | |
| Enid, OK | 22.0% | 5th | -12.5 pp | 3rd | on par with peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 15.7% | 6th | -9.1 pp | 2nd | 29% below peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 15.4% | 7th | -8.1 pp | 1st | 30% below peers |
Below the state by 9.2 points in SY2026 (13.2% vs 22.4%). Since SY2017 the city moved -8.7 and the state -8.3, so the city lost 0.4 points of ground (floor 2). Excluded from the change: 2024 (shown on the chart, not used).
Midwest City's public school districts are 9.2 points below Oklahoma (13.2% vs 22.4%, SY2026) and have held about even with Oklahoma since 2017. Their own figure moved from 21.9% to 13.2% over that span (down 40% relative to the 2017 level); Oklahoma moved from 30.7% to 22.4%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2017 to 2026 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 22.4% | -8.3 pp | ||||
| Lawton, OK | 12.9% | 9th | -19.2 pp | 9th | 34% below peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 32.9% | 1st | -19.0 pp | 8th | 68% above peers | |
| Moore, OK | 30.9% | 2nd | -12.3 pp | 7th | 58% above peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 13.2% | 8th | -8.7 pp | 6th | 33% below peers | |
| Norman, OK | 24.3% | 4th | -8.7 pp | 5th | 24% above peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 14.4% | 7th | -7.9 pp | 4th | 27% below peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 19.6% | 5th | -7.1 pp | 3rd | on par with peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 15.9% | 6th | -4.2 pp | 2nd | 19% below peers | |
| Enid, OK | 24.9% | 3rd | -3.9 pp | 1st | 27% above peers |
Below the state by 11.0 points in SY2026 (24.3% vs 35.3%). Since SY2017 the city moved -10.9 and the state -5.3, so the city lost 5.6 points of ground (floor 2).
Midwest City's public school districts are 11 points below Oklahoma (24.3% vs 35.3%, SY2026) and have lost 5.6 points of ground to Oklahoma since 2017. Their own figure moved from 35.2% to 24.3% over that span (down 31% relative to the 2017 level); Oklahoma moved from 40.6% to 35.3%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2017 to 2026 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 35.3% | -5.3 pp | ||||
| Lawton, OK | 15.9% | 9th | -19.6 pp | 9th | 48% below peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 50.2% | 1st | -12.8 pp | 8th | 63% above peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 30.8% | 5th | -11.4 pp | 7th | on par with peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 24.3% | 8th | -10.9 pp | 6th | 21% below peers | |
| Moore, OK | 35.6% | 4th | -9.8 pp | 5th | 16% above peers | |
| Enid, OK | 35.7% | 3rd | -9.1 pp | 4th | 16% above peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 25.3% | 7th | -5.7 pp | 3rd | 18% below peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 27.4% | 6th | -2.1 pp | 2nd | 11% below peers | |
| Norman, OK | 43.4% | 2nd | +0.5 pp | 1st | 41% above peers |
Below the state by 14.8 points in SY2025 (64.5% vs 79.3%). Since SY2018 the city moved -20.8 and the state -7.8, so the city lost 13.0 points of ground (floor 2).
Midwest City's public school districts are 14.8 points below Oklahoma (64.5% vs 79.3%, SY2025) and have lost 13 points of ground to Oklahoma since 2018. Their own figure moved from 85.3% to 64.5% over that span (down 24% relative to the 2018 level); Oklahoma moved from 87.1% to 79.3%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2018 to 2025 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 79.3% | -7.8 pp | ||||
| Midwest City, OK | 64.5% | 9th | -20.8 pp | 9th | 22% below peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 64.9% | 8th | -18.8 pp | 8th | 21% below peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 66.9% | 7th | -18.1 pp | 7th | 19% below peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 79.9% | 6th | -9.8 pp | 6th | 3% below peers | |
| Norman, OK | 82.3% | 5th | -5.2 pp | 5th | on par with peers | |
| Moore, OK | 83.9% | 4th | -4.7 pp | 4th | 2% above peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 87.3% | 3rd | -3.5 pp | 3rd | 6% above peers | |
| Enid, OK | 94.0% | 1st | +3.6 pp | 2nd | 14% above peers | |
| Lawton, OK | 89.3% | 2nd | +3.9 pp | 1st | 9% above peers |
Above the state by 7.3 points in SY2022 (18.1 vs 10.8). Since SY2018 the city moved -1.4 and the state +1.9, so the city lost 3.3 points of ground (floor 2).
Midwest City's public school districts are 7.3 per 100 students above Oklahoma (18.1 per 100 students vs 10.8 per 100 students, SY2022) and have gained 3.3 per 100 students of ground on Oklahoma since 2018. Their own figure moved from 19.5 per 100 students to 18.1 per 100 students over that span (down 7% relative to the 2018 level); Oklahoma moved from 8.9 per 100 students to 10.8 per 100 students.
| Place | Latestper 100 students | Today's rank | Change2018 to 2022 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 10.8 | +1.9 | ||||
| Moore, OK | 12.3 | 6th | +4.2 | 9th | 4% above peers | |
| Lawton, OK | 5.1 | 1st | +3.8 | 8th | 57% below peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 22.8 | 9th | +3.7 | 7th | 93% above peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 6.4 | 2nd | +2.4 | 6th | 46% below peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 9.5 | 3rd | +2.3 | 5th | 19% below peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 16.1 | 7th | +2.0 | 4th | 36% above peers | |
| Norman, OK | 10.8 | 4th | +2.0 | 3rd | 8% below peers | |
| Enid, OK | 11.8 | 5th | +1.0 | 2nd | on par with peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 18.1 | 8th | -1.4 | 1st | 53% above peers |
Below the state by 10.2 points in SY2025 (26.8% vs 37.0%). Since SY2018 the city moved -3.3 and the state -1.0, so the city lost 2.3 points of ground (floor 2).
Midwest City's public school districts are 10.2 points below Oklahoma (26.8% vs 37.0%, SY2025) and have lost 2.3 points of ground to Oklahoma since 2018. Their own figure moved from 30.1% to 26.8% over that span (down 11% relative to the 2018 level); Oklahoma moved from 38.0% to 37.0%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2018 to 2025 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 37.0% | -1.0 pp | ||||
| Edmond, OK | 61.2% | 1st | -9.8 pp | 9th | 71% above peers | |
| Enid, OK | 35.8% | 5th | -4.3 pp | 8th | on par with peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 26.8% | 8th | -3.3 pp | 7th | 25% below peers | |
| Norman, OK | 51.0% | 2nd | -2.8 pp | 6th | 42% above peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 27.7% | 7th | -2.5 pp | 5th | 23% below peers | |
| Lawton, OK | 31.5% | 6th | +0.9 pp | 4th | 12% below peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 24.9% | 9th | +2.0 pp | 3rd | 30% below peers | |
| Moore, OK | 48.2% | 3rd | +2.2 pp | 2nd | 35% above peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 43.0% | 4th | +4.0 pp | 1st | 20% above peers |
Below the state by 8.3 points in SY2025 (9.7% vs 18.0%). Since SY2018 the city moved -6.3 and the state -4.0, so the city lost 2.3 points of ground (floor 2).
Midwest City's public school districts are 8.3 points below Oklahoma (9.7% vs 18.0%, SY2025) and have lost 2.3 points of ground to Oklahoma since 2018. Their own figure moved from 16.0% to 9.7% over that span (down 39% relative to the 2018 level); Oklahoma moved from 22.0% to 18.0%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2018 to 2025 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 18.0% | -4.0 pp | ||||
| Edmond, OK | 37.9% | 1st | -14.8 pp | 9th | 175% above peers | |
| Enid, OK | 11.8% | 7th | -11.3 pp | 8th | 14% below peers | |
| Norman, OK | 28.4% | 2nd | -9.5 pp | 7th | 106% above peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 9.7% | 8th | -6.3 pp | 6th | 30% below peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 13.8% | 5th | -5.5 pp | 5th | on par with peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 19.0% | 4th | -4.0 pp | 4th | 38% above peers | |
| Lawton, OK | 13.0% | 6th | -3.6 pp | 3rd | 6% below peers | |
| Moore, OK | 25.7% | 3rd | -3.5 pp | 2nd | 86% above peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 9.7% | 9th | -1.7 pp | 1st | 30% below peers |
Below the state by 9.8 points in SY2026 (10.1% vs 19.9%). Since SY2022 the city moved -8.7 and the state -5.3, so the city lost 3.4 points of ground (floor 2).
Midwest City's public school districts are 9.8 points below Oklahoma (10.1% vs 19.9%, SY2026) and have lost 3.4 points of ground to Oklahoma since 2022. Their own figure moved from 18.8% to 10.1% over that span (down 46% relative to the 2022 level); Oklahoma moved from 25.2% to 19.9%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2022 to 2026 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 19.9% | -5.3 pp | ||||
| Norman, OK | 27.4% | 3rd | -17.3 pp | 9th | 38% above peers | |
| Lawton, OK | 14.2% | 7th | -9.5 pp | 8th | 28% below peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 10.1% | 9th | -8.7 pp | 7th | 49% below peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 43.7% | 1st | -8.3 pp | 6th | 121% above peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 17.1% | 6th | -7.1 pp | 5th | 14% below peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 12.9% | 8th | -5.6 pp | 4th | 35% below peers | |
| Enid, OK | 19.8% | 5th | -4.2 pp | 3rd | on par with peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 29.3% | 2nd | -1.0 pp | 2nd | 48% above peers | |
| Moore, OK | 23.1% | 4th | +0.5 pp | 1st | 17% above peers |
Below the state by 9.8 points in SY2026 (30.8% vs 40.6%). Since SY2022 the city moved -15.7 and the state -5.6, so the city lost 10.1 points of ground (floor 2).
Midwest City's public school districts are 9.8 points below Oklahoma (30.8% vs 40.6%, SY2026) and have lost 10.1 points of ground to Oklahoma since 2022. Their own figure moved from 46.5% to 30.8% over that span (down 34% relative to the 2022 level); Oklahoma moved from 46.2% to 40.6%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2022 to 2026 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 40.6% | -5.6 pp | ||||
| Midwest City, OK | 30.8% | 9th | -15.7 pp | 9th | 26% below peers | |
| Enid, OK | 41.4% | 5th | -13.1 pp | 8th | on par with peers | |
| Norman, OK | 49.2% | 3rd | -10.6 pp | 7th | 19% above peers | |
| Lawton, OK | 32.3% | 8th | -9.1 pp | 6th | 22% below peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 65.2% | 1st | -7.1 pp | 5th | 57% above peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 38.4% | 6th | -4.4 pp | 4th | 7% below peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 37.4% | 7th | -3.0 pp | 3rd | 10% below peers | |
| Moore, OK | 46.9% | 4th | -2.2 pp | 2nd | 13% above peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 54.3% | 2nd | +4.7 pp | 1st | 31% above peers |
Below the state by 14.3 points in SY2025 (64.4% vs 78.7%). Since SY2018 the city moved -16.3 and the state -4.7, so the city lost 11.6 points of ground (floor 2).
Midwest City's public school districts are 14.3 points below Oklahoma (64.4% vs 78.7%, SY2025) and have lost 11.6 points of ground to Oklahoma since 2018. Their own figure moved from 80.7% to 64.4% over that span (down 20% relative to the 2018 level); Oklahoma moved from 83.4% to 78.7%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2018 to 2025 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 78.7% | -4.7 pp | ||||
| Tulsa, OK | 55.2% | 9th | -18.0 pp | 9th | 33% below peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 64.4% | 7th | -16.3 pp | 8th | 22% below peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 57.6% | 8th | -15.3 pp | 7th | 30% below peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 85.8% | 4th | -7.0 pp | 6th | 4% above peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 80.6% | 6th | +0.0 pp | 5th | 3% below peers | |
| Lawton, OK | 82.8% | 5th | +3.6 pp | 4th | on par with peers | |
| Norman, OK | 88.1% | 3rd | +4.7 pp | 3rd | 6% above peers | |
| Moore, OK | 88.6% | 2nd | +8.8 pp | 2nd | 7% above peers | |
| Enid, OK | 93.9% | 1st | +14.3 pp | 1st | 13% above peers |
Above the state by 8.6 points in SY2024 (90.8% vs 82.2%). Since SY2017 the city moved -2.8 and the state -0.7, so the city lost 2.1 points of ground (floor 2).
Midwest City's public school districts are 8.6 points above Oklahoma (90.8% vs 82.2%, SY2024) and have lost 2.1 points of ground to Oklahoma since 2017. Their own figure moved from 93.6% to 90.8% over that span (down 3% relative to the 2017 level); Oklahoma moved from 82.9% to 82.2%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2017 to 2024 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 82.2% | -0.7 pp | ||||
| Tulsa, OK | 77.8% | 9th | -5.1 pp | 9th | 9% below peers | |
| Norman, OK | 83.9% | 6th | -4.4 pp | 8th | 1% below peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 90.8% | 2nd | -2.8 pp | 7th | 7% above peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 91.5% | 1st | +0.2 pp | 6th | 8% above peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 85.6% | 4th | +0.5 pp | 5th | 1% above peers | |
| Lawton, OK | 81.2% | 8th | +0.9 pp | 4th | 5% below peers | |
| Enid, OK | 85.1% | 5th | +2.3 pp | 3rd | on par with peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 82.7% | 7th | +2.7 pp | 2nd | 3% below peers | |
| Moore, OK | 88.7% | 3rd | +4.6 pp | 1st | 4% above peers |
Below the state by 5.9 points in SY2025 (48.1% vs 54.0%). Since SY2018 the city moved +1.5 and the state +11.4, so the city lost 9.9 points of ground (floor 2).
Midwest City's public school districts are 5.9 points below Oklahoma (48.1% vs 54.0%, SY2025) and have lost 9.9 points of ground to Oklahoma since 2018. Their own figure moved from 46.6% to 48.1% over that span (up 3% relative to the 2018 level); Oklahoma moved from 42.6% to 54.0%.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Change2018 to 2025 | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 54.0% | +11.4 pp | ||||
| Moore, OK | 44.6% | 9th | -5.5 pp | 9th | 18% below peers | |
| Edmond, OK | 59.3% | 3rd | -4.5 pp | 8th | 10% above peers | |
| Midwest City, OK | 48.1% | 8th | +1.5 pp | 7th | 11% below peers | |
| Tulsa, OK | 54.1% | 5th | +2.7 pp | 6th | on par with peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 51.8% | 7th | +10.2 pp | 5th | 4% below peers | |
| Lawton, OK | 52.7% | 6th | +11.1 pp | 4th | 3% below peers | |
| Norman, OK | 60.2% | 2nd | +14.5 pp | 3rd | 11% above peers | |
| Enid, OK | 62.1% | 1st | +18.0 pp | 2nd | 15% above peers | |
| Broken Arrow, OK | 57.6% | 4th | +25.4 pp | 1st | 6% above peers |
A real change beyond the survey margin; neither direction is inherently better for this metric.
Population rose about 2% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 57,288 to 58,297 - more than the combined survey margin (±92).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wake Forest, NC | 52,844 | 31st | +25% | 1st | 9% below peers | ||
| Bel Air South, MD | 58,137 | 21st | +20% | 2nd | on par with peers | ||
| Bozeman, MT | 56,114 | 30th | +20% | 3rd | 4% below peers | ||
| Lacey, WA | 57,737 | 23rd | +17% | 4th | 1% below peers | ||
| Severn, MD | 58,402 | 15th | +16% | 5th | on par with peers | ||
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | 56,447 | 29th | +12% | 6th | 3% below peers | ||
| Hoboken, NJ | 58,668 | 12th | +10% | 7th | on par with peers | ||
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | 58,359 | 17th | +7% | 8th | on par with peers | ||
| Carson City, NV | 58,384 | 16th | +7% | 9th | on par with peers | ||
| Decatur, AL | 57,361 | 26th | +5% | 10th | 2% below peers | ||
| Pocatello, ID | 57,635 | 25th | +4% | 11th | 1% below peers | ||
| San Rafael, CA | 60,433 | 1st | +3% | 12th | 4% above peers | ||
| Santee, CA | 59,332 | 4th | +3% | 13th | 2% above peers | ||
| Midwest City, OK | 58,297 | 19th | +2% | 14th | on par with peers | ||
| Dubuque, IA | 59,174 | 6th | +2% | 15th | 1% above peers | ||
| Towson, MD | 58,679 | 11th | +1% | 16th | 1% above peers | ||
| Des Plaines, IL | 59,156 | 7th | +1% | 17th | 1% above peers | ||
| Bradenton, FL | 57,014 | 27th | +1% | 18th | 2% below peers | ||
| Casper, WY | 58,839 | 9th | +1% | 19th | 1% above peers | ||
| Sarasota, FL | 56,970 | 28th | +0% | 20th | 2% below peers | ||
| Gardena, CA | 59,422 | 3rd | -0% | 21st | 2% above peers | ||
| Bowie, MD | 57,926 | 22nd | -1% | 22nd | 1% below peers | ||
| Springfield, OH | 58,190 | 20th | -2% | 23rd | on par with peers | ||
| Cupertino, CA | 58,566 | 13th | -3% | 24th | on par with peers | ||
| Lancaster, PA | 57,719 | 24th | -3% | 25th | 1% below peers | ||
| Coconut Creek, FL | 58,330 | 18th | -4% | 26th | on par with peers | ||
| Terre Haute, IN | 58,427 | 14th | -4% | 27th | on par with peers | ||
| Mayagüez zona urbana, PR | 58,977 | 8th | -4% | 28th | 1% above peers | ||
| Pico Rivera, CA | 60,272 | 2nd | -4% | 29th | 3% above peers | ||
| The Hammocks, FL | 58,838 | 10th | -4% | 30th | 1% above peers | ||
| Youngstown, OH | 59,331 | 5th | -8% | 31st | 2% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Single-parent changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (40.7% then, 45.5% now; margin ±7.2pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 31.0% | -0.6pp | |||||
| United States ref | 29.9% | -0.2pp | |||||
| Bowie, MD | 32.0% | 15th | +11.9pp | 1st | 4% above peers | ||
| Gardena, CA | 43.4% | 9th | +14.6pp | 2nd | 41% above peers | ||
| Coconut Creek, FL | 36.3% | 13th | +8.6pp | 3rd | 18% above peers | ||
| Lacey, WA | 37.5% | 11th | +8.2pp | 4th | 22% above peers | ||
| Towson, MD | 23.6% | 22nd | +3.6pp | 5th | 23% below peers | ||
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | 36.9% | 12th | +4.6pp | 6th | 20% above peers | ||
| Midwest City, OK | 45.5% | 7th | +4.8pp | 7th | 48% above peers | ||
| Terre Haute, IN | 51.2% | 4th | +5.0pp | 8th | 66% above peers | ||
| Decatur, AL | 43.3% | 10th | +3.7pp | 9th | 41% above peers | ||
| Severn, MD | 28.9% | 18th | +2.4pp | 10th | 6% below peers | ||
| Pico Rivera, CA | 28.9% | 19th | +1.6pp | 11th | 6% below peers | ||
| Sarasota, FL | 44.0% | 8th | +1.3pp | 12th | 43% above peers | ||
| Mayagüez zona urbana, PR | 73.4% | 1st | +1.6pp | 13th | 138% above peers | ||
| Bradenton, FL | 50.5% | 5th | +1.0pp | 14th | 64% above peers | ||
| Des Plaines, IL | 20.0% | 26th | -0.0pp | 15th | 35% below peers | ||
| Casper, WY | 30.8% | 16th | -1.0pp | 16th | on par with peers | ||
| Youngstown, OH | 72.6% | 2nd | -5.6pp | 17th | 136% above peers | ||
| Springfield, OH | 55.7% | 3rd | -4.8pp | 18th | 81% above peers | ||
| The Hammocks, FL | 28.2% | 20th | -2.8pp | 19th | 8% below peers | ||
| Hoboken, NJ | 21.1% | 25th | -2.7pp | 20th | 31% below peers | ||
| Carson City, NV | 32.5% | 14th | -4.6pp | 21st | 5% above peers | ||
| Lancaster, PA | 45.9% | 6th | -8.6pp | 22nd | 49% above peers | ||
| Bel Air South, MD | 18.3% | 27th | -3.6pp | 23rd | 40% below peers | ||
| Dubuque, IA | 30.3% | 17th | -5.9pp | 24th | 2% below peers | ||
| Santee, CA | 18.1% | 28th | -3.8pp | 25th | 41% below peers | ||
| Pocatello, ID | 23.3% | 23rd | -5.0pp | 26th | 24% below peers | ||
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | 25.5% | 21st | -5.7pp | 27th | 17% below peers | ||
| Cupertino, CA | 6.3% | 31st | -1.6pp | 28th | 80% below peers | ||
| Wake Forest, NC | 17.5% | 30th | -4.5pp | 29th | 43% below peers | ||
| San Rafael, CA | 22.4% | 24th | -7.5pp | 30th | 27% below peers | ||
| Bozeman, MT | 18.0% | 29th | -7.3pp | 31st | 41% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Working parents changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (73.1% then, 63.4% now; margin ±10.5pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma ref | 64.1% | +1.3pp | |||||
| United States ref | 68.1% | +1.9pp | |||||
| Carson City, NV | 83.2% | 3rd | +22.1pp | 1st | 23% above peers | ||
| Lacey, WA | 61.8% | 26th | +13.9pp | 2nd | 9% below peers | ||
| Bradenton, FL | 79.8% | 6th | +16.0pp | 3rd | 18% above peers | ||
| San Rafael, CA | 75.6% | 9th | +12.3pp | 4th | 12% above peers | ||
| Coeur d'Alene, ID | 71.6% | 12th | +10.8pp | 5th | 6% above peers | ||
| Wake Forest, NC | 68.0% | 15th | +10.2pp | 6th | on par with peers | ||
| Severn, MD | 82.6% | 4th | +11.4pp | 7th | 22% above peers | ||
| Lake Havasu City, AZ | 78.6% | 7th | +10.7pp | 8th | 16% above peers | ||
| Hoboken, NJ | 86.4% | 2nd | +8.2pp | 9th | 28% above peers | ||
| Gardena, CA | 77.7% | 8th | +6.3pp | 10th | 15% above peers | ||
| Mayagüez zona urbana, PR | 62.0% | 25th | +2.3pp | 11th | 8% below peers | ||
| Des Plaines, IL | 67.4% | 17th | +2.2pp | 12th | on par with peers | ||
| Bowie, MD | 80.8% | 5th | +0.8pp | 13th | 19% above peers | ||
| Cupertino, CA | 58.9% | 27th | +0.5pp | 14th | 13% below peers | ||
| Dubuque, IA | 86.7% | 1st | +0.6pp | 15th | 28% above peers | ||
| Lancaster, PA | 72.1% | 11th | -1.1pp | 16th | 6% above peers | ||
| Bel Air South, MD | 73.1% | 10th | -1.7pp | 17th | 8% above peers | ||
| Casper, WY | 66.7% | 20th | -1.7pp | 18th | 1% below peers | ||
| Terre Haute, IN | 67.2% | 19th | -2.4pp | 19th | 1% below peers | ||
| Coconut Creek, FL | 67.7% | 16th | -3.4pp | 20th | on par with peers | ||
| Bozeman, MT | 57.9% | 30th | -4.2pp | 21st | 14% below peers | ||
| Santee, CA | 69.8% | 14th | -5.4pp | 22nd | 3% above peers | ||
| Pico Rivera, CA | 67.2% | 18th | -5.9pp | 23rd | 1% below peers | ||
| Pocatello, ID | 58.0% | 29th | -6.1pp | 24th | 14% below peers | ||
| Decatur, AL | 54.5% | 31st | -7.1pp | 25th | 19% below peers | ||
| Sarasota, FL | 66.0% | 21st | -8.9pp | 26th | 3% below peers | ||
| The Hammocks, FL | 58.3% | 28th | -8.7pp | 27th | 14% below peers | ||
| Midwest City, OK | 63.4% | 22nd | -9.7pp | 28th | 6% below peers | ||
| Towson, MD | 70.2% | 13th | -14.6pp | 29th | 4% above peers | ||
| Springfield, OH | 63.2% | 23rd | -16.9pp | 30th | 7% below peers | ||
| Youngstown, OH | 63.2% | 24th | -17.3pp | 31st | 7% below peers |