DataWorks Commons
Champaign, IL
← All cities
89,996 people (2024) 50k-100k Midwest

Bright spots 10 indicators

Where Champaign, IL shows a real improvement in recent years, or stands clearly ahead of its peers. How this is calculated →

What needs attention 6 indicators

Where Champaign, IL shows a real worsening in recent years, or trails its peers clearly. How this is calculated →

Big shifts 5 indicators

Real moves and big gaps, where neither direction is simply good or bad. Biggest relative change first; big-gap cards come last. How this is calculated →

All indicators

Public Safety
Public Safety

Violent crime rate

▼ Lower is better Verified improver
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Violent crime fell about 18% over the 12 months ending May 2026, faster than 82% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: violent crime fell about 12% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 100% of similar-size cities. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
Longer view: violent crime fell about 7% a year from 2018 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: 382 in May 2026, down from 466 a year earlier.
382 per 100k
2018May 2026
Compare all 18 similar-size cities by change rank
Each place's latest 12 months compares against its prior 12. significant improvement · significant worsening · within chance fluctuation for counts this size (Poisson test at 90%; these are administrative tallies, so the test covers event randomness, not survey error).
Place Latestper 100k Today's rank Changelast 12 months Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
U.S. (RTCI sample) ref 456 (Apr 26) -9.3%
Clifton, NJ 127 (May 26) 6th -32.0% 1st 60% below peers
Santa Fe, NM 70 (May 26) 2nd -22.9% 2nd 78% below peers
Bloomington, MN 226 (May 26) 8th -21.0% 3rd 29% below peers
Champaign, IL 382 (May 26) 12th -18.0% 4th 20% above peers
Troy, MI 94 (May 26) 4th -15.2% 5th 71% below peers
Avondale, AZ 343 (May 26) 11th -14.6% 6th 8% above peers
Norwalk, CT 57 (Apr 26) 1st -14.3% 7th 82% below peers
Temple, TX 301 (Jan 25) 9th -13.3% 8th 5% below peers
Merced, CA 708 (May 26) 17th -5.9% 9th 122% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 646 (May 26) 16th -3.2% 10th 103% above peers
Lawrence, MA 402 (May 26) 13th -0.8% 11th 26% above peers
Ogden, UT 470 (May 26) 15th +1.5% 12th 47% above peers
Mission Viejo, CA 110 (May 26) 5th +1.8% 13th 66% below peers
Westminster, CA 412 (May 26) 14th +4.2% 14th 30% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 846 (May 26) 18th +5.3% 15th 166% above peers
Manteca, CA 318 (May 26) 10th +12.8% 16th on par with peers
Nashua, NH 155 (Jan 25) 7th +25.4% 17th 51% below peers
Newton, MA 78 (Dec 25) 3rd +61.4% 18th 75% below peers

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Because this metric moves monthly, each listed city also held or improved over its own most recent 12 months (shown on each row), and the list is ordered by that recent movement. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Roswell, GA down about 41% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 12% a year · 2021-2026
  • Middletown, OH down about 31% over the 12 months ending July 2025 · sustained: down about 10% a year · 2020-2025
  • Elkhart, IN down about 20% over the 12 months ending April 2026 · sustained: down about 15% a year · 2021-2026
Public Safety

Property crime rate

▼ Lower is better Improving recently, trailing peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Property crime fell about 4% over the 12 months ending May 2026, slower than 76% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: property crime rose about 7% a year from 2021 to 2026. That is movement in the wrong direction.
Longer view: property crime fell about 2% a year from 2018 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: 2,092 in May 2026, down from 2,175 a year earlier.
2,092 per 100k
2018May 2026
Compare all 18 similar-size cities by change rank
Each place's latest 12 months compares against its prior 12. significant improvement · significant worsening · within chance fluctuation for counts this size (Poisson test at 90%; these are administrative tallies, so the test covers event randomness, not survey error).
Place Latestper 100k Today's rank Changelast 12 months Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
U.S. (RTCI sample) ref 1,987 (Apr 26) -12.2%
Mission Viejo, CA 737 (May 26) 2nd -34.5% 1st 64% below peers
Norwalk, CT 997 (Apr 26) 5th -25.8% 2nd 51% below peers
Clifton, NJ 1,700 (May 26) 9th -23.2% 3rd 16% below peers
Lawrence, MA 803 (May 26) 3rd -21.9% 4th 60% below peers
Santa Fe, NM 3,809 (May 26) 17th -19.9% 5th 88% above peers
Westminster, CA 2,047 (May 26) 11th -19.4% 6th 1% above peers
Troy, MI 930 (May 26) 4th -17.9% 7th 54% below peers
Newton, MA 504 (Dec 25) 1st -15.0% 8th 75% below peers
Santa Monica, CA 3,848 (May 26) 18th -14.5% 9th 90% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 3,123 (May 26) 16th -12.7% 10th 54% above peers
Avondale, AZ 2,026 (May 26) 10th -9.9% 11th on par with peers
Merced, CA 2,452 (May 26) 14th -6.1% 12th 21% above peers
Ogden, UT 1,685 (May 26) 8th -5.2% 13th 17% below peers
Champaign, IL 2,092 (May 26) 12th -3.8% 14th 3% above peers
Bloomington, MN 2,896 (May 26) 15th -2.2% 15th 43% above peers
Manteca, CA 1,415 (May 26) 7th +11.0% 16th 30% below peers
Nashua, NH 1,267 (Jan 25) 6th +12.8% 17th 37% below peers
Temple, TX 2,203 (Jan 25) 13th +17.0% 18th 9% above peers

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Because this metric moves monthly, each listed city also held or improved over its own most recent 12 months (shown on each row), and the list is ordered by that recent movement. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Appleton, WI down about 39% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 8% a year · 2021-2026
  • Bartlett, TN down about 31% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 11% a year · 2021-2026
  • West Haven, CT down about 25% over the 12 months ending April 2026 · sustained: down about 13% a year · 2021-2026
Public Safety

Homicide rate

▼ Lower is better Improving, leading peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Homicide was essentially flat over the 12 months ending May 2026.

Multi-year view: homicide fell about 12% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 73% of similar-size cities. The change does not yet pass the noise and consistency checks, so treat it as a raw signal.
Longer view: homicide fell about 2% a year from 2018 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: 6 in May 2026, unchanged from 6 a year earlier.
6 per 100k
2018May 2026
Compare all 18 similar-size cities by change rank
Each place's latest 12 months compares against its prior 12. significant improvement · significant worsening · within chance fluctuation for counts this size (Poisson test at 90%; these are administrative tallies, so the test covers event randomness, not survey error).
Place Latestper 100k Today's rank Changelast 12 months Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
U.S. (RTCI sample) ref 6 (Apr 26) -17.8%
Clifton, NJ 0 (May 26) 1st -100.0% 1st 100% below peers
Nashua, NH 0 (Jan 25) 2nd -100.0% 2nd 100% below peers
Bloomington, MN 0 (May 26) 3rd -100.0% 3rd 100% below peers
Troy, MI 0 (May 26) 4th -100.0% 4th 100% below peers
Mission Viejo, CA 0 (May 26) 5th -100.0% 5th 100% below peers
Santa Monica, CA 4 (May 26) 11th -50.1% 6th 1% above peers
Westminster, CA 2 (May 26) 9th -33.3% 7th 49% below peers
Lawrence, MA 4 (May 26) 12th -20.1% 8th 2% above peers
Champaign, IL 6 (May 26) 14th +0.0% 9th 47% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 4 (May 26) 10th +0.0% 10th on par with peers
Manteca, CA 1 (May 26) 8th +0.0% 11th 77% below peers
Santa Fe, NM 9 (May 26) 16th +14.3% 12th 99% above peers
Temple, TX 11 (Jan 25) 17th +83.3% 13th 150% above peers
Avondale, AZ 6 (May 26) 13th +99.7% 14th 38% above peers
Merced, CA 12 (May 26) 18th +100.2% 15th 177% above peers
Ogden, UT 8 (May 26) 15th +133.5% 16th 79% above peers
Newton, MA 0 (Dec 25) 6th 100% below peers
Norwalk, CT 0 (Apr 26) 7th 100% below peers

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Because this metric moves monthly, each listed city also held or improved over its own most recent 12 months (shown on each row), and the list is ordered by that recent movement. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Gardena, CA down about 100% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 17% a year · 2021-2026
  • Utica, NY down about 67% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 13% a year · 2021-2026
  • Bowling Green, KY essentially flat over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 14% a year · 2021-2026
Public Safety

Motor vehicle theft rate

▼ Lower is better Improving recently, leading peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Vehicle theft fell about 29% over the 12 months ending May 2026, faster than 76% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: vehicle theft fell about 2% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 53% of similar-size cities. The change does not yet pass the noise and consistency checks, so treat it as a raw signal.
Longer view: vehicle theft rose about 10% a year from 2018 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: 152 in May 2026, down from 215 a year earlier.
152 per 100k
2018May 2026
Compare all 18 similar-size cities by change rank
Each place's latest 12 months compares against its prior 12. significant improvement · significant worsening · within chance fluctuation for counts this size (Poisson test at 90%; these are administrative tallies, so the test covers event randomness, not survey error).
Place Latestper 100k Today's rank Changelast 12 months Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
U.S. (RTCI sample) ref 303 (Apr 26) -22.2%
Santa Fe, NM 320 (May 26) 16th -49.9% 1st 97% above peers
Newton, MA 23 (Dec 25) 1st -32.3% 2nd 86% below peers
Merced, CA 274 (May 26) 15th -31.8% 3rd 69% above peers
Clifton, NJ 163 (May 26) 10th -30.0% 4th on par with peers
Champaign, IL 152 (May 26) 9th -29.5% 5th 7% below peers
Santa Monica, CA 375 (May 26) 18th -29.3% 6th 130% above peers
Avondale, AZ 190 (May 26) 11th -27.8% 7th 17% above peers
Lawrence, MA 76 (May 26) 3rd -27.7% 8th 53% below peers
Fort Smith, AR 227 (May 26) 12th -24.3% 9th 39% above peers
Bloomington, MN 110 (May 26) 6th -23.0% 10th 32% below peers
Norwalk, CT 116 (Apr 26) 7th -18.7% 11th 29% below peers
Mission Viejo, CA 90 (May 26) 5th -15.6% 12th 45% below peers
Troy, MI 62 (May 26) 2nd -12.5% 13th 62% below peers
Ogden, UT 149 (May 26) 8th -8.3% 14th 8% below peers
Temple, TX 321 (Jan 25) 17th -1.2% 15th 97% above peers
Westminster, CA 250 (May 26) 14th +0.0% 16th 54% above peers
Manteca, CA 239 (May 26) 13th +6.9% 17th 47% above peers
Nashua, NH 86 (Jan 25) 4th +36.2% 18th 47% below peers

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Because this metric moves monthly, each listed city also held or improved over its own most recent 12 months (shown on each row), and the list is ordered by that recent movement. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Eagan, MN down about 55% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 22% a year · 2022-2026
  • Corvallis, OR down about 37% over the 12 months ending April 2026 · sustained: down about 16% a year · 2021-2026
  • Davis, CA down about 33% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 12% a year · 2021-2026
See all Public Safety data →
Economy
Economy

Median household income

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Household income rose about 16% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from $48,415 to $56,118 (each survey's own dollars, not adjusted for inflation) - more than the combined survey margin (±$3,987). 30 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 30 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: household income rose about 33% from 2014 to 2024 ($42,077 to $56,118).
$56,118
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Illinois ref $83,390 +27%
United States ref $80,734 +28%
Trenton, NJ $52,537 31st +48% 1st 32% below peers
Hemet, CA $57,719 27th +45% 2nd 25% below peers
Ogden, UT $72,575 19th +45% 3rd 6% below peers
Waukegan, IL $71,919 20th +44% 4th 7% below peers
Indio, CA $77,167 16th +44% 5th on par with peers
South Gate, CA $74,571 17th +43% 6th 3% below peers
Merced, CA $63,122 23rd +40% 7th 18% below peers
Avondale, AZ $86,123 14th +39% 8th 12% above peers
Springdale, AR $69,787 21st +39% 9th 10% below peers
Santa Barbara, CA $106,182 7th +39% 10th 38% above peers
Westminster, CA $85,541 15th +37% 11th 11% above peers
Lawrence, MA $60,433 24th +35% 12th 22% below peers
Alafaya, FL $100,950 9th +34% 13th 31% above peers
Manteca, CA $97,055 11th +33% 14th 26% above peers
Fort Smith, AR $54,816 29th +31% 15th 29% below peers
San Leandro, CA $101,420 8th +30% 16th 31% above peers
Bryan, TX $59,289 26th +30% 17th 23% below peers
Nashua, NH $96,326 12th +28% 18th 25% above peers
Clifton, NJ $98,237 10th +28% 19th 27% above peers
Santa Fe, NM $73,482 18th +27% 20th 5% below peers
Newton, MA $190,304 1st +26% 21st 147% above peers
Norwalk, CT $107,616 6th +25% 22nd 39% above peers
Germantown, MD $117,546 4th +24% 23rd 52% above peers
Temple, TX $68,204 22nd +24% 24th 12% below peers
Deerfield Beach, FL $59,730 25th +24% 25th 23% below peers
Bloomington, MN $93,211 13th +24% 26th 21% above peers
Santa Monica, CA $114,885 5th +19% 27th 49% above peers
Troy, MI $120,045 3rd +18% 28th 56% above peers
Champaign, IL $56,118 28th +16% 29th 27% below peers
Mission Viejo, CA $136,123 2nd +15% 30th 76% above peers
Lawton, OK $54,433 30th +14% 31st 29% below peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyMedian household income
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Florin, CA up about 59% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Cathedral City, CA up about 58% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Country Club, FL up about 56% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±$3,560 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Unemployment rate

▼ Lower is better Worsening, slower than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Unemployment rose less than 0.1 percentage points a year from 2022 to 2025. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening slower than 89% of similar-size cities over 2022-2025.
Longer view: unemployment fell less than 0.1 percentage points a year from 2015 to 2025.
Most recent monthly reading: 4.0% in May 2026, up from 3.4% a year earlier.
4.0%
1990May 2026
Compare all 29 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Illinois ref 5.1% (May 26) +0.7pp
United States ref 4.2% (Jun 26) +0.1pp
Trenton, NJ 6.3% (May 26) 27th -1.5pp 1st 57% above peers
Clifton, NJ 4.0% (May 26) 12th -0.9pp 2nd on par with peers
Merced, CA 6.8% (May 26) 29th -0.9pp 3rd 70% above peers
Westminster, CA 3.8% (May 26) 8th -0.7pp 4th 5% below peers
Newton, MA 3.7% (May 26) 6th -0.5pp 5th 7% below peers
Indio, CA 4.5% (May 26) 20th -0.5pp 6th 12% above peers
San Leandro, CA 4.0% (May 26) 13th -0.5pp 7th on par with peers
Hemet, CA 6.3% (May 26) 28th -0.4pp 8th 57% above peers
South Gate, CA 4.6% (May 26) 22nd -0.4pp 9th 15% above peers
Lawrence, MA 5.9% (May 26) 26th -0.4pp 10th 48% above peers
Manteca, CA 5.1% (May 26) 23rd -0.3pp 11th 27% above peers
Nashua, NH 3.2% (May 26) 3rd -0.3pp 12th 20% below peers
Mission Viejo, CA 3.6% (May 26) 5th -0.2pp 13th 10% below peers
Santa Barbara, CA 2.7% (May 26) 1st -0.2pp 14th 32% below peers
Santa Monica, CA 5.4% (May 26) 25th -0.2pp 15th 35% above peers
Ogden, UT 3.8% (May 26) 9th +0.1pp 16th 5% below peers
Fort Smith, AR 3.7% (May 26) 7th +0.1pp 17th 7% below peers
Springdale, AR 3.0% (May 26) 2nd +0.1pp 18th 25% below peers
Bryan, TX 3.5% (May 26) 4th +0.2pp 19th 12% below peers
Avondale, AZ 4.3% (May 26) 16th +0.3pp 20th 7% above peers
Temple, TX 4.3% (May 26) 17th +0.4pp 21st 7% above peers
Bloomington, MN 4.0% (May 26) 14th +0.4pp 22nd on par with peers
Waukegan, IL 4.4% (May 26) 19th +0.4pp 23rd 10% above peers
Santa Fe, NM 3.8% (May 26) 10th +0.6pp 24th 5% below peers
Champaign, IL 4.0% (May 26) 15th +0.6pp 25th on par with peers
Troy, MI 3.9% (May 26) 11th +0.7pp 26th 3% below peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 4.3% (May 26) 18th +1.0pp 27th 7% above peers
Norwalk, CT 4.5% (May 26) 21st +1.0pp 28th 12% above peers
Lawton, OK 5.2% (May 26) 24th +1.6pp 29th 30% above peers
Economy

Share of people below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better Turning up (early signal)
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Poverty changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (22.7% then, 23.4% now; margin ±2.2pp). The newest releases lean upward: each of the last 3 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 11 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: poverty fell 1.2 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (24.6% to 23.4%).
23.4%
20112024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Illinois ref 11.5% -0.8pp
United States ref 12.0%
Indio, CA 11.4% 14th -5.0pp 1st 11% below peers
Hemet, CA 14.8% 21st -6.2pp 2nd 16% above peers
South Gate, CA 12.7% 15th -4.4pp 3rd on par with peers
Trenton, NJ 20.9% 28th -6.8pp 4th 64% above peers
Springdale, AR 13.2% 17th -4.2pp 5th 4% above peers
Ogden, UT 13.3% 18th -3.5pp 6th 5% above peers
Clifton, NJ 7.9% 5th -1.8pp 7th 38% below peers
Merced, CA 23.6% 31st -5.3pp 8th 86% above peers
Avondale, AZ 10.8% 12th -2.4pp 9th 15% below peers
Lawrence, MA 17.4% 25th -3.6pp 10th 37% above peers
Manteca, CA 9.5% 11th -1.9pp 11th 26% below peers
Nashua, NH 7.7% 4th -1.4pp 12th 39% below peers
San Leandro, CA 8.2% 6th -1.3pp 13th 35% below peers
Fort Smith, AR 18.0% 26th -2.7pp 14th 41% above peers
Waukegan, IL 15.0% 23rd -2.2pp 15th 18% above peers
Alafaya, FL 9.3% 10th -1.2pp 16th 27% below peers
Norwalk, CT 9.1% 8th -1.0pp 17th 29% below peers
Westminster, CA 14.3% 20th -1.1pp 18th 12% above peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 14.8% 22nd -1.1pp 19th 16% above peers
Santa Fe, NM 12.7% 16th -0.6pp 20th on par with peers
Temple, TX 15.8% 24th -0.1pp 21st 24% above peers
Bryan, TX 22.1% 29th +0.4pp 22nd 74% above peers
Champaign, IL 23.4% 30th +0.7pp 23rd 84% above peers
Mission Viejo, CA 5.6% 3rd +0.3pp 24th 56% below peers
Newton, MA 4.2% 1st +0.2pp 25th 67% below peers
Troy, MI 5.4% 2nd +0.3pp 26th 58% below peers
Santa Barbara, CA 13.9% 19th +1.5pp 27th 9% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 11.1% 13th +1.2pp 28th 13% below peers
Lawton, OK 18.9% 27th +2.4pp 29th 49% above peers
Bloomington, MN 9.1% 9th +1.7pp 30th 29% below peers
Germantown, MD 8.8% 7th +2.2pp 31st 31% below peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of people below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Sanford, FL down 7.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Florin, CA down 9.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Porterville, CA down 10.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.8pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys *Early signal: consecutive releases agree on direction only; the size of the newest movement is not measurable from overlapping surveys. about this metric
Economy

Share of children below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Child poverty changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (16.9% then, 15.7% now; margin ±4.3pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 15 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: child poverty fell 11.6 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (27.3% to 15.7%).
15.7%
20132024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Illinois ref 15.1% -2.0pp
United States ref 16.1%
Clifton, NJ 7.4% 5th -7.8pp 1st 54% below peers
San Leandro, CA 7.0% 4th -5.7pp 2nd 56% below peers
South Gate, CA 14.6% 13th -9.6pp 3rd 8% below peers
Manteca, CA 9.1% 8th -5.7pp 4th 43% below peers
Hemet, CA 17.7% 20th -10.7pp 5th 11% above peers
Newton, MA 1.9% 1st -1.0pp 6th 88% below peers
Springdale, AR 18.2% 21st -8.7pp 7th 14% above peers
Trenton, NJ 26.3% 28th -12.2pp 8th 65% above peers
Troy, MI 3.6% 2nd -1.4pp 9th 77% below peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 16.7% 17th -6.5pp 10th 5% above peers
Indio, CA 17.6% 19th -6.4pp 11th 10% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 22.6% 25th -7.5pp 12th 42% above peers
Nashua, NH 9.7% 9th -2.3pp 13th 39% below peers
Avondale, AZ 15.1% 14th -3.4pp 14th 5% below peers
Alafaya, FL 8.5% 7th -1.8pp 15th 47% below peers
Merced, CA 33.4% 31st -5.5pp 16th 110% above peers
Temple, TX 20.9% 24th -3.3pp 17th 32% above peers
Westminster, CA 17.1% 18th -2.4pp 18th 7% above peers
Lawrence, MA 24.1% 26th -2.7pp 19th 52% above peers
Bryan, TX 29.6% 30th -3.3pp 20th 86% above peers
Ogden, UT 19.4% 23rd -1.9pp 21st 22% above peers
Norwalk, CT 12.7% 10th -1.1pp 22nd 20% below peers
Champaign, IL 15.7% 15th -1.2pp 23rd 1% below peers
Waukegan, IL 24.5% 27th -1.5pp 24th 54% above peers
Mission Viejo, CA 5.5% 3rd -0.3pp 25th 65% below peers
Santa Fe, NM 19.0% 22nd -1.0pp 26th 19% above peers
Lawton, OK 28.7% 29th +2.3pp 27th 80% above peers
Bloomington, MN 13.1% 11th +3.2pp 28th 18% below peers
Santa Barbara, CA 15.9% 16th +4.4pp 29th on par with peers
Santa Monica, CA 7.7% 6th +2.4pp 30th 52% below peers
Germantown, MD 14.2% 12th +5.2pp 31st 11% below peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of children below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
3 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 3 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Somerville, MA down 13.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Southfield, MI down 8.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Brentwood, NY down 9.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2017-2022
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±3.4pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Households with a broadband internet subscription

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Broadband rose 7.2 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 84.3% to 91.5% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.5pp). 28 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started mid-pack and has reached a genuinely better level; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 28 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: broadband rose 8.9 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (82.6% to 91.5%).
91.5%
20172024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Illinois ref 90.9% +7.8pp
United States ref 91.1%
Trenton, NJ 82.0% 31st +18.1pp 1st 12% below peers
Springdale, AR 91.2% 21st +18.5pp 2nd 2% below peers
Lawrence, MA 84.9% 30th +12.7pp 3rd 9% below peers
Hemet, CA 88.9% 26th +11.8pp 4th 4% below peers
Ogden, UT 93.9% 9th +12.4pp 5th 1% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 85.4% 29th +10.4pp 6th 8% below peers
Indio, CA 93.2% 14th +10.4pp 7th on par with peers
Santa Fe, NM 91.9% 18th +9.7pp 8th 1% below peers
Temple, TX 90.6% 23rd +8.9pp 9th 2% below peers
Bryan, TX 87.1% 28th +8.4pp 10th 6% below peers
Clifton, NJ 91.4% 20th +8.4pp 11th 2% below peers
Champaign, IL 91.5% 19th +7.2pp 12th 1% below peers
South Gate, CA 90.9% 22nd +7.0pp 13th 2% below peers
Lawton, OK 90.3% 24th +6.5pp 14th 3% below peers
Westminster, CA 93.6% 10th +6.6pp 15th 1% above peers
Merced, CA 94.3% 6th +6.6pp 16th 2% above peers
San Leandro, CA 93.5% 12th +6.4pp 17th 1% above peers
Waukegan, IL 90.1% 25th +6.1pp 18th 3% below peers
Santa Barbara, CA 94.0% 8th +5.8pp 19th 1% above peers
Avondale, AZ 92.5% 17th +5.6pp 20th on par with peers
Manteca, CA 93.6% 11th +5.4pp 21st 1% above peers
Bloomington, MN 92.8% 16th +5.1pp 22nd on par with peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 87.4% 27th +4.2pp 23rd 6% below peers
Nashua, NH 93.4% 13th +3.8pp 24th 1% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 94.2% 7th +3.0pp 25th 1% above peers
Newton, MA 96.9% 2nd +3.1pp 26th 4% above peers
Norwalk, CT 93.0% 15th +2.6pp 27th on par with peers
Germantown, MD 96.6% 3rd +2.5pp 28th 4% above peers
Mission Viejo, CA 97.1% 1st +2.5pp 29th 5% above peers
Troy, MI 96.0% 4th +2.4pp 30th 3% above peers
Alafaya, FL 95.2% 5th +1.6pp 31st 3% above peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds with a broadband internet subscription
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Olympia, WA up 11.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 85% of this group · 2019-2024
  • The Hammocks, FL up 11.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 82% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Redding, CA up 11.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 81% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.7pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Income inequality (Gini index)

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Inequality changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (0.55 then, 0.56 now; margin ±0.02).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 6 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: inequality rose about 7% from 2014 to 2024 (0.52 to 0.56).
0.56
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Illinois ref 0.48 -0.001
United States ref 0.48 +0.001
Indio, CA 0.43 8th -0.036 1st 5% below peers
Avondale, AZ 0.38 1st -0.023 2nd 17% below peers
Ogden, UT 0.43 9th -0.024 3rd 5% below peers
Westminster, CA 0.47 20th -0.019 4th 3% above peers
Alafaya, FL 0.38 2nd -0.014 5th 15% below peers
Lawton, OK 0.44 11th -0.013 6th 4% below peers
Temple, TX 0.45 15th -0.010 7th on par with peers
Germantown, MD 0.40 3rd -0.009 8th 11% below peers
Lawrence, MA 0.46 18th -0.010 9th on par with peers
Merced, CA 0.47 19th -0.008 10th 3% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 0.54 30th -0.007 11th 20% above peers
Norwalk, CT 0.49 26th -0.006 12th 9% above peers
Nashua, NH 0.44 12th -0.001 13th 4% below peers
Santa Fe, NM 0.48 23rd +0.000 14th 5% above peers
Bryan, TX 0.47 21st +0.002 15th 4% above peers
Mission Viejo, CA 0.41 4th +0.003 16th 10% below peers
Waukegan, IL 0.44 13th +0.005 17th 3% below peers
Trenton, NJ 0.53 29th +0.009 18th 16% above peers
Manteca, CA 0.41 5th +0.008 19th 9% below peers
Troy, MI 0.42 7th +0.009 20th 7% below peers
Bloomington, MN 0.43 10th +0.011 21st 4% below peers
Newton, MA 0.49 24th +0.012 22nd 8% above peers
Springdale, AR 0.46 17th +0.012 23rd on par with peers
Champaign, IL 0.56 31st +0.015 24th 24% above peers
Santa Barbara, CA 0.50 27th +0.019 25th 10% above peers
South Gate, CA 0.42 6th +0.018 26th 7% below peers
San Leandro, CA 0.45 14th +0.020 27th 1% below peers
Hemet, CA 0.47 22nd +0.027 28th 4% above peers
Clifton, NJ 0.45 16th +0.027 29th on par with peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 0.49 25th +0.031 30th 9% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 0.52 28th +0.034 31st 15% above peers
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B19083) through 2024 ±0.02 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Households receiving SNAP

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

SNAP changed less than the survey can measure between the 2014-2018 and 2019-2023 surveys (9.3% then, 9.7% now; margin ±1.7pp).

Within the survey margin, 2014-2018 vs 2019-2023 surveys; 16 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: snap rose 1.8 percentage points from 2013 to 2023 (7.9% to 9.7%).
9.7%
20102023
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2019-2023 survey Today's rank Change2014-2018 → 2019-2023 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Illinois ref 13.5% +0.4pp
United States ref 11.8% -0.5pp
Springdale, AR 6.0% 5th -5.2pp 1st 48% below peers
Ogden, UT 11.6% 16th -4.4pp 2nd on par with peers
Nashua, NH 7.2% 7th -2.6pp 3rd 37% below peers
Fort Smith, AR 13.2% 20th -3.6pp 4th 14% above peers
Manteca, CA 8.8% 10th -2.0pp 5th 24% below peers
Avondale, AZ 12.0% 17th -2.6pp 6th 4% above peers
Temple, TX 14.2% 21st -2.3pp 7th 23% above peers
Waukegan, IL 18.5% 25th -2.0pp 8th 60% above peers
Alafaya, FL 8.6% 9th -0.8pp 9th 26% below peers
Clifton, NJ 11.2% 14th -1.0pp 10th 3% below peers
Trenton, NJ 26.1% 29th -0.1pp 11th 126% above peers
Bryan, TX 13.1% 19th +0.1pp 12th 13% above peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 14.5% 22nd +0.4pp 13th 25% above peers
Champaign, IL 9.7% 12th +0.3pp 14th 16% below peers
Newton, MA 4.4% 1st +0.2pp 15th 62% below peers
Bloomington, MN 5.9% 4th +0.2pp 16th 49% below peers
Germantown, MD 8.9% 11th +0.4pp 17th 23% below peers
Lawton, OK 18.7% 26th +1.0pp 18th 62% above peers
Lawrence, MA 43.9% 31st +3.1pp 19th 280% above peers
Santa Fe, NM 12.4% 18th +1.2pp 20th 7% above peers
Hemet, CA 19.9% 27th +2.5pp 21st 72% above peers
Merced, CA 30.0% 30th +4.9pp 22nd 159% above peers
Troy, MI 5.2% 3rd +0.9pp 23rd 55% below peers
South Gate, CA 20.3% 28th +3.6pp 24th 75% above peers
Westminster, CA 14.5% 23rd +2.8pp 25th 26% above peers
Norwalk, CT 10.2% 13th +2.3pp 26th 12% below peers
San Leandro, CA 11.3% 15th +2.8pp 27th 2% below peers
Santa Barbara, CA 7.3% 8th +2.5pp 28th 36% below peers
Santa Monica, CA 6.0% 6th +3.2pp 29th 48% below peers
Indio, CA 17.3% 24th +9.4pp 30th 50% above peers
Mission Viejo, CA 4.9% 2nd +3.2pp 31st 58% below peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2018 to 2023, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds receiving SNAP
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Queen Creek, AZ down 2.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2018-2023
  • El Dorado Hills, CA down 1.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2018-2023
  • South Jordan, UT down 1.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2018-2023
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2023 ±1.1pp at 90% confidence (2023 estimate) survey trend: 2014-2018 vs 2019-2023 surveys about this metric
See all Economy data →
Housing
Housing

Typical home value

No better direction Rising recently, faster than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Home value rose about 5% over the 12 months ending June 2026, faster than 90% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: home value rose about 7% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 79% of similar-size cities.
Longer view: home value rose about 6% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: $241,516 in June 2026, up from $230,199 a year earlier.
$241,516
2001June 2026
Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Illinois ref $298,871 (Jun 26) +5.0%
United States ref $372,995 (Jun 26) +0.8%
Waukegan, IL $247,565 (Jun 26) 27th +7.0% 1st 48% below peers
Lawton, OK $142,204 (Jun 26) 30th +5.6% 2nd 70% below peers
Norwalk, CT $679,881 (Jun 26) 8th +5.0% 3rd 44% above peers
Champaign, IL $241,516 (Jun 26) 28th +4.9% 4th 49% below peers
Springdale, AR $342,727 (Jun 26) 23rd +3.9% 5th 27% below peers
Clifton, NJ $616,096 (Jun 26) 9th +3.6% 6th 30% above peers
Fort Smith, AR $197,471 (Jun 26) 29th +3.5% 7th 58% below peers
Nashua, NH $517,357 (Jun 26) 13th +3.3% 8th 10% above peers
Westminster, CA $1,104,016 (Jun 26) 5th +3.3% 9th 134% above peers
Santa Barbara, CA $1,834,551 (Jun 26) 1st +3.0% 10th 288% above peers
Troy, MI $472,471 (Jun 26) 15th +2.6% 11th on par with peers
South Gate, CA $701,329 (Jun 26) 7th +2.4% 12th 48% above peers
Bloomington, MN $370,580 (Jun 26) 21st +2.3% 13th 22% below peers
Lawrence, MA $521,895 (Jun 26) 12th +2.2% 14th 10% above peers
Newton, MA $1,564,706 (Jun 26) 3rd +2.0% 15th 231% above peers
Bryan, TX $277,011 (Jun 26) 24th +0.9% 16th 41% below peers
Santa Monica, CA $1,698,037 (Jun 26) 2nd +0.8% 17th 259% above peers
Mission Viejo, CA $1,224,499 (Jun 26) 4th +0.8% 18th 159% above peers
Ogden, UT $401,774 (Jun 26) 18th +0.6% 19th 15% below peers
Santa Fe, NM $589,611 (Jun 26) 10th +0.3% 20th 25% above peers
Hemet, CA $445,921 (Jun 26) 16th -0.1% 21st 6% below peers
Merced, CA $397,690 (Jun 26) 20th -1.5% 22nd 16% below peers
Indio, CA $513,884 (Jun 26) 14th -1.5% 23rd 9% above peers
Avondale, AZ $398,215 (Jun 26) 19th -1.8% 24th 16% below peers
Trenton, NJ $356,470 (Jun 26) 22nd -1.9% 25th 25% below peers
Temple, TX $249,750 (Jun 26) 26th -2.8% 26th 47% below peers
Germantown, MD $425,701 (Jun 26) 17th -2.8% 27th 10% below peers
San Leandro, CA $815,011 (Jun 26) 6th -3.1% 28th 72% above peers
Manteca, CA $585,227 (Jun 26) 11th -4.2% 29th 24% above peers
Deerfield Beach, FL $272,664 (Jun 26) 25th -5.0% 30th 42% below peers
Housing

Starter home value (bottom tier)

No better direction Rising recently, faster than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Starter homes rose about 7% over the 12 months ending June 2026, faster than 97% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: starter homes rose about 7% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 76% of similar-size cities.
Longer view: starter homes rose about 7% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: $157,490 in June 2026, up from $147,486 a year earlier.
$157,490
2001June 2026
Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Illinois ref $155,806 (Jun 26) +6.0%
United States ref $202,486 (Jun 26) +2.0%
Waukegan, IL $199,539 (Jun 26) 24th +9.9% 1st 43% below peers
Champaign, IL $157,490 (Jun 26) 27th +6.8% 2nd 55% below peers
Lawton, OK $74,294 (Jun 26) 30th +5.6% 3rd 79% below peers
Clifton, NJ $523,401 (Jun 26) 8th +5.2% 4th 50% above peers
Springdale, AR $263,332 (Jun 26) 22nd +5.0% 5th 24% below peers
Norwalk, CT $439,024 (Jun 26) 10th +4.8% 6th 26% above peers
Fort Smith, AR $114,649 (Jun 26) 29th +4.5% 7th 67% below peers
Westminster, CA $934,008 (Jun 26) 4th +3.7% 8th 168% above peers
Nashua, NH $387,942 (Jun 26) 13th +3.5% 9th 12% above peers
Newton, MA $990,781 (Jun 26) 2nd +3.5% 10th 185% above peers
Troy, MI $342,306 (Jun 26) 17th +3.3% 11th 2% below peers
Lawrence, MA $379,426 (Jun 26) 14th +3.2% 12th 9% above peers
South Gate, CA $637,011 (Jun 26) 7th +3.0% 13th 83% above peers
Santa Barbara, CA $1,225,066 (Jun 26) 1st +2.9% 14th 252% above peers
Bloomington, MN $272,110 (Jun 26) 21st +2.2% 15th 22% below peers
Bryan, TX $189,999 (Jun 26) 25th +1.1% 16th 45% below peers
Ogden, UT $322,385 (Jun 26) 19th +1.0% 17th 7% below peers
Santa Fe, NM $409,850 (Jun 26) 11th +0.9% 18th 18% above peers
Mission Viejo, CA $879,254 (Jun 26) 5th +0.2% 19th 153% above peers
Indio, CA $394,123 (Jun 26) 12th +0.0% 20th 13% above peers
Merced, CA $324,862 (Jun 26) 18th -0.6% 21st 7% below peers
Hemet, CA $345,970 (Jun 26) 16th -0.9% 22nd 1% below peers
Santa Monica, CA $956,112 (Jun 26) 3rd -1.2% 23rd 175% above peers
Avondale, AZ $347,883 (Jun 26) 15th -1.8% 24th on par with peers
Trenton, NJ $208,402 (Jun 26) 23rd -2.5% 25th 40% below peers
San Leandro, CA $654,632 (Jun 26) 6th -2.9% 26th 88% above peers
Temple, TX $168,706 (Jun 26) 26th -3.5% 27th 52% below peers
Germantown, MD $311,886 (Jun 26) 20th -3.7% 28th 10% below peers
Manteca, CA $481,476 (Jun 26) 9th -4.0% 29th 38% above peers
Deerfield Beach, FL $124,254 (Jun 26) 28th -11.2% 30th 64% below peers
Housing

Homeownership rate

▲ Higher is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Homeownership changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (42.6% then, 43.8% now; margin ±2.1pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 12 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: homeownership fell 3.8 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (47.6% to 43.8%).
43.8%
20112024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Illinois ref 67.1% +1.0pp
United States ref 65.2%
Manteca, CA 72.4% 3rd +10.6pp 1st 30% above peers
Avondale, AZ 61.6% 12th +6.6pp 2nd 10% above peers
Merced, CA 45.9% 24th +4.6pp 3rd 18% below peers
Springdale, AR 53.4% 19th +4.0pp 4th 4% below peers
Waukegan, IL 50.2% 23rd +3.7pp 5th 10% below peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 63.9% 9th +4.4pp 6th 15% above peers
Hemet, CA 62.3% 11th +3.8pp 7th 12% above peers
Germantown, MD 67.2% 5th +4.1pp 8th 20% above peers
Ogden, UT 61.3% 13th +3.5pp 9th 10% above peers
South Gate, CA 45.3% 25th +2.5pp 10th 19% below peers
Fort Smith, AR 53.4% 20th +2.7pp 11th 4% below peers
Trenton, NJ 37.9% 29th +1.9pp 12th 32% below peers
Bryan, TX 50.9% 22nd +2.5pp 13th 9% below peers
San Leandro, CA 58.1% 15th +2.2pp 14th 4% above peers
Champaign, IL 43.8% 27th +1.2pp 15th 22% below peers
Westminster, CA 53.4% 18th +1.4pp 16th 4% below peers
Alafaya, FL 64.4% 8th +1.7pp 17th 15% above peers
Clifton, NJ 59.6% 14th +1.6pp 18th 7% above peers
Nashua, NH 55.8% 16th +1.0pp 19th on par with peers
Santa Fe, NM 63.6% 10th +0.9pp 20th 14% above peers
Mission Viejo, CA 76.9% 1st -0.0pp 21st 38% above peers
Lawton, OK 44.8% 26th -0.1pp 22nd 20% below peers
Troy, MI 73.2% 2nd -0.5pp 23rd 31% above peers
Santa Barbara, CA 39.9% 28th -0.8pp 24th 29% below peers
Bloomington, MN 65.8% 7th -1.5pp 25th 18% above peers
Newton, MA 70.0% 4th -2.0pp 26th 25% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 27.9% 31st -1.1pp 27th 50% below peers
Norwalk, CT 55.6% 17th -2.4pp 28th on par with peers
Temple, TX 52.3% 21st -2.3pp 29th 6% below peers
Indio, CA 67.1% 6th -3.5pp 30th 20% above peers
Lawrence, MA 28.1% 30th -3.0pp 31st 50% below peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHomeownership rate
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.5pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Housing

Typical asking rent

No better direction Rising recently, faster than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Rent rose about 6% over the 12 months ending June 2026, faster than 90% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: rent rose about 8% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 93% of similar-size cities.
Longer view: rent rose about 6% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: $1,410 in June 2026, up from $1,334 a year earlier.
$1,410
2015June 2026
Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
United States ref $1,965 (Jun 26) +2.2%
South Gate, CA $2,002 (Jun 26) 16th +9.0% 1st 6% below peers
Mission Viejo, CA $3,074 (Jun 26) 4th +7.7% 2nd 44% above peers
Indio, CA $2,616 (Jun 26) 9th +7.2% 3rd 22% above peers
Champaign, IL $1,410 (Jun 26) 27th +5.7% 4th 34% below peers
Fort Smith, AR $1,071 (Jun 26) 30th +5.2% 5th 50% below peers
Lawton, OK $1,086 (Jun 26) 29th +5.1% 6th 49% below peers
San Leandro, CA $2,468 (Jun 26) 10th +3.6% 7th 15% above peers
Newton, MA $3,685 (Jun 26) 2nd +3.5% 8th 72% above peers
Lawrence, MA $2,347 (Jun 26) 12th +3.1% 9th 10% above peers
Santa Barbara, CA $3,967 (Jun 26) 1st +3.1% 10th 86% above peers
Clifton, NJ $2,668 (Jun 26) 6th +2.7% 11th 25% above peers
Nashua, NH $2,216 (Jun 26) 13th +2.7% 12th 4% above peers
Merced, CA $1,964 (Jun 26) 17th +2.3% 13th 8% below peers
Waukegan, IL $1,648 (Jun 26) 23rd +2.3% 14th 23% below peers
Bloomington, MN $1,684 (Jun 26) 22nd +2.2% 15th 21% below peers
Norwalk, CT $2,718 (Jun 26) 5th +2.0% 16th 27% above peers
Westminster, CA $2,629 (Jun 26) 7th +1.7% 17th 23% above peers
Trenton, NJ $2,139 (Jun 26) 14th +1.5% 18th on par with peers
Santa Monica, CA $3,517 (Jun 26) 3rd +1.5% 19th 65% above peers
Springdale, AR $1,513 (Jun 26) 24th +1.4% 20th 29% below peers
Troy, MI $1,861 (Jun 26) 20th +1.3% 21st 13% below peers
Santa Fe, NM $1,932 (Jun 26) 19th +1.1% 22nd 10% below peers
Deerfield Beach, FL $2,440 (Jun 26) 11th +0.7% 23rd 14% above peers
Bryan, TX $1,428 (Jun 26) 26th +0.5% 24th 33% below peers
Manteca, CA $2,624 (Jun 26) 8th +0.5% 25th 23% above peers
Hemet, CA $1,939 (Jun 26) 18th +0.2% 26th 9% below peers
Ogden, UT $1,310 (Jun 26) 28th +0.1% 27th 39% below peers
Germantown, MD $2,137 (Jun 26) 15th +0.0% 28th on par with peers
Temple, TX $1,428 (Jun 26) 25th -0.4% 29th 33% below peers
Avondale, AZ $1,809 (Jun 26) 21st -0.6% 30th 15% below peers
Housing

Housing cost-burdened households

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Cost burden changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (36.9% then, 38.0% now; margin ±3.2pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 6 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: cost burden fell 2.0 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (40.1% to 38.0%).
38.0%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Illinois ref 30.4% -0.8pp
United States ref 32.2% +0.4pp
Waukegan, IL 34.2% 11th -5.4pp 1st 10% below peers
Germantown, MD 29.9% 5th -4.0pp 2nd 21% below peers
South Gate, CA 45.1% 25th -5.8pp 3rd 19% above peers
Trenton, NJ 45.8% 27th -4.2pp 4th 20% above peers
Indio, CA 41.4% 19th -3.4pp 5th 9% above peers
Clifton, NJ 42.5% 22nd -2.0pp 6th 12% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 28.3% 3rd -0.8pp 7th 26% below peers
Merced, CA 43.4% 24th -0.6pp 8th 14% above peers
Santa Barbara, CA 45.3% 26th -0.6pp 9th 19% above peers
Hemet, CA 46.6% 28th -0.5pp 10th 23% above peers
Norwalk, CT 41.7% 20th -0.4pp 11th 10% above peers
Nashua, NH 33.8% 10th -0.3pp 12th 11% below peers
Springdale, AR 25.0% 2nd +0.2pp 13th 34% below peers
San Leandro, CA 41.7% 21st +0.4pp 14th 10% above peers
Lawton, OK 32.1% 7th +0.4pp 15th 16% below peers
Santa Monica, CA 42.5% 23rd +1.0pp 16th 12% above peers
Lawrence, MA 54.2% 31st +1.4pp 17th 42% above peers
Westminster, CA 47.5% 29th +1.4pp 18th 25% above peers
Alafaya, FL 32.6% 8th +1.0pp 19th 14% below peers
Champaign, IL 38.0% 16th +1.2pp 20th on par with peers
Newton, MA 30.5% 6th +1.0pp 21st 20% below peers
Bryan, TX 39.5% 17th +1.3pp 22nd 4% above peers
Manteca, CA 40.8% 18th +1.7pp 23rd 7% above peers
Avondale, AZ 35.2% 13th +1.6pp 24th 8% below peers
Santa Fe, NM 35.7% 14th +1.7pp 25th 6% below peers
Bloomington, MN 28.9% 4th +1.6pp 26th 24% below peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 48.2% 30th +2.9pp 27th 27% above peers
Mission Viejo, CA 37.5% 15th +2.8pp 28th 1% below peers
Troy, MI 20.9% 1st +1.7pp 29th 45% below peers
Ogden, UT 33.4% 9th +3.4pp 30th 12% below peers
Temple, TX 34.3% 12th +3.9pp 31st 10% below peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHousing cost-burdened households
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Des Plaines, IL down 5.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Newark, OH down 5.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Toms River, NJ down 6.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Housing

Households without a vehicle

▼ Lower is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →

No vehicle rose 3.6 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 13.1% to 16.7% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.8pp). 2 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 5 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: no vehicle rose 2.5 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (14.2% to 16.7%).
16.7%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Illinois ref 11.0% +0.1pp
United States ref 8.3% -0.3pp
Springdale, AR 3.9% 4th -1.9pp 1st 49% below peers
Alafaya, FL 1.6% 1st -0.5pp 2nd 80% below peers
Waukegan, IL 8.4% 19th -1.9pp 3rd 10% above peers
Manteca, CA 3.2% 3rd -0.7pp 4th 59% below peers
Merced, CA 8.9% 23rd -1.8pp 5th 16% above peers
Lawrence, MA 20.3% 30th -3.9pp 6th 165% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 7.6% 15th -1.0pp 7th 1% below peers
Trenton, NJ 26.7% 31st -3.4pp 8th 248% above peers
Temple, TX 6.7% 11th -0.8pp 9th 13% below peers
Santa Fe, NM 4.5% 6th -0.5pp 10th 42% below peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 9.4% 25th -0.6pp 11th 23% above peers
Clifton, NJ 10.0% 27th -0.5pp 12th 30% above peers
Avondale, AZ 4.6% 8th -0.2pp 13th 40% below peers
Santa Barbara, CA 7.9% 18th -0.3pp 14th 3% above peers
South Gate, CA 7.7% 16th -0.3pp 15th on par with peers
Mission Viejo, CA 2.8% 2nd -0.0pp 16th 63% below peers
Indio, CA 4.0% 5th -0.0pp 17th 48% below peers
Nashua, NH 7.9% 17th -0.0pp 18th 2% above peers
Hemet, CA 9.0% 24th -0.0pp 19th 18% above peers
Ogden, UT 8.9% 22nd +0.0pp 20th 16% above peers
Bryan, TX 6.5% 10th +0.2pp 21st 15% below peers
Lawton, OK 9.9% 26th +0.4pp 22nd 29% above peers
Newton, MA 6.4% 9th +0.3pp 23rd 16% below peers
Santa Monica, CA 11.4% 28th +0.9pp 24th 49% above peers
Westminster, CA 7.6% 14th +0.8pp 25th 1% below peers
Troy, MI 4.6% 7th +0.6pp 26th 41% below peers
Bloomington, MN 6.8% 12th +0.9pp 27th 12% below peers
Norwalk, CT 8.5% 20th +1.7pp 28th 10% above peers
Champaign, IL 16.7% 29th +3.6pp 29th 118% above peers
San Leandro, CA 8.9% 21st +1.9pp 30th 16% above peers
Germantown, MD 7.5% 13th +2.0pp 31st 3% below peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHouseholds without a vehicle
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Manhattan, KS down 4.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Racine, WI down 5.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Plainfield, NJ down 8.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B08201) through 2024 ±1.4pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Housing data →
Health
Health

People without health insurance

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (4.5% then, 5.3% now; margin ±1.0pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 14 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: uninsured fell 5.2 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (10.5% to 5.3%).
5.3%
20122024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Illinois ref 6.8% -0.0pp
United States ref 8.2% -0.4pp
Norwalk, CT 10.3% 20th -6.3pp 1st 27% above peers
Clifton, NJ 6.8% 12th -3.7pp 2nd 16% below peers
Mission Viejo, CA 3.2% 3rd -1.1pp 3rd 61% below peers
Santa Fe, NM 9.9% 19th -3.1pp 4th 22% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 3.5% 4th -1.0pp 5th 57% below peers
Hemet, CA 7.0% 13th -1.8pp 6th 13% below peers
Alafaya, FL 8.1% 16th -1.8pp 7th on par with peers
Santa Barbara, CA 8.2% 17th -1.8pp 8th on par with peers
Lawrence, MA 5.5% 8th -1.2pp 9th 32% below peers
South Gate, CA 12.8% 23rd -2.3pp 10th 57% above peers
Lawton, OK 10.9% 21st -1.3pp 11th 35% above peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 16.7% 29th -1.8pp 12th 106% above peers
Bryan, TX 16.4% 28th -1.4pp 13th 102% above peers
Westminster, CA 6.2% 10th -0.5pp 14th 23% below peers
Manteca, CA 4.2% 5th -0.3pp 15th 49% below peers
Germantown, MD 6.3% 11th -0.3pp 16th 22% below peers
San Leandro, CA 5.1% 6th -0.2pp 17th 37% below peers
Ogden, UT 13.4% 25th -0.0pp 18th 65% above peers
Waukegan, IL 15.7% 27th -0.0pp 19th 93% above peers
Merced, CA 7.5% 14th +0.1pp 20th 7% below peers
Troy, MI 2.8% 2nd +0.0pp 21st 66% below peers
Trenton, NJ 17.2% 30th +0.2pp 22nd 112% above peers
Newton, MA 1.2% 1st +0.0pp 23rd 85% below peers
Fort Smith, AR 12.6% 22nd +0.5pp 24th 55% above peers
Bloomington, MN 5.5% 9th +0.5pp 25th 32% below peers
Temple, TX 13.6% 26th +1.8pp 26th 68% above peers
Indio, CA 9.0% 18th +1.2pp 27th 11% above peers
Champaign, IL 5.3% 7th +0.8pp 28th 35% below peers
Springdale, AR 20.8% 31st +3.3pp 29th 156% above peers
Avondale, AZ 13.3% 24th +2.1pp 30th 64% above peers
Nashua, NH 7.9% 15th +1.9pp 31st 2% below peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthPeople without health insurance
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Mountain View, CA down 2.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Brookline, MA down 1.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Minnetonka, MN down 1.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.8pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Health

Adult obesity

▼ Lower is better Level only
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Adult obesity is somewhat above the peer median.

35.1%
20202022
Compare all 31 similar-size cities best first
Place Latest Today's rank History Latest vs. peers
Illinois ref 34.6%
United States ref 33.4%
San Leandro, CA 20.3% 1st 38% below peers
Newton, MA 20.4% 2nd 37% below peers
Westminster, CA 22.9% 3rd 30% below peers
Santa Monica, CA 23.0% 4th 29% below peers
Santa Fe, NM 24.0% 5th 26% below peers
Troy, MI 24.9% 6th 23% below peers
Germantown, MD 25.0% 7th 23% below peers
Mission Viejo, CA 25.0% 8th 23% below peers
Norwalk, CT 26.7% 9th 18% below peers
Bloomington, MN 27.2% 10th 16% below peers
Clifton, NJ 28.5% 11th 12% below peers
Alafaya, FL 30.3% 12th 7% below peers
Nashua, NH 31.0% 13th 5% below peers
Santa Barbara, CA 31.5% 14th 3% below peers
South Gate, CA 31.6% 15th 3% below peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 32.5% 16th on par with peers
Manteca, CA 33.9% 17th 4% above peers
Merced, CA 34.4% 18th 6% above peers
Champaign, IL 35.1% 19th 8% above peers
Avondale, AZ 36.2% 20th 11% above peers
Indio, CA 36.7% 21st 13% above peers
Springdale, AR 37.0% 22nd 14% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 37.4% 23rd 15% above peers
Ogden, UT 37.6% 24th 16% above peers
Lawrence, MA 38.1% 25th 17% above peers
Hemet, CA 38.3% 26th 18% above peers
Waukegan, IL 38.4% 27th 18% above peers
Temple, TX 38.7% 28th 19% above peers
Bryan, TX 39.6% 29th 22% above peers
Trenton, NJ 42.6% 30th 31% above peers
Lawton, OK 44.5% 31st 37% above peers
CDC PLACES through 2022 modeled tract map about this metric
Health

Children without health insurance

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Child uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (1.9% then, 2.3% now; margin ±1.6pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 10 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: child uninsured fell 3.1 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (5.4% to 2.3%).
2.3%
20122024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Illinois ref 3.3% +0.2pp
United States ref 5.5% +0.4pp
Norwalk, CT 5.6% 20th -17.1pp 1st 29% above peers
Santa Fe, NM 5.4% 19th -5.2pp 2nd 24% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 2.2% 5th -2.0pp 3rd 49% below peers
Mission Viejo, CA 2.1% 4th -1.7pp 4th 52% below peers
Lawrence, MA 1.7% 3rd -1.4pp 5th 60% below peers
Hemet, CA 4.4% 16th -2.3pp 6th on par with peers
South Gate, CA 4.2% 15th -2.1pp 7th 5% below peers
Alafaya, FL 4.1% 14th -1.9pp 8th 5% below peers
Clifton, NJ 3.8% 13th -1.0pp 9th 14% below peers
Bloomington, MN 5.4% 18th -1.2pp 10th 23% above peers
Santa Barbara, CA 5.2% 17th -0.9pp 11th 18% above peers
Germantown, MD 2.5% 7th -0.4pp 12th 42% below peers
Bryan, TX 10.0% 28th -1.2pp 13th 129% above peers
Manteca, CA 1.4% 2nd -0.1pp 14th 69% below peers
Waukegan, IL 5.8% 21st -0.3pp 15th 32% above peers
Ogden, UT 9.0% 25th -0.2pp 16th 105% above peers
Springdale, AR 13.1% 30th -0.3pp 17th 200% above peers
Westminster, CA 3.1% 10th +0.3pp 18th 29% below peers
Champaign, IL 2.3% 6th +0.3pp 19th 48% below peers
Merced, CA 3.4% 11th +0.5pp 20th 23% below peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 13.6% 31st +2.4pp 21st 210% above peers
Troy, MI 2.8% 8th +0.5pp 22nd 37% below peers
Lawton, OK 7.9% 23rd +1.9pp 23rd 80% above peers
Avondale, AZ 11.4% 29th +3.4pp 24th 161% above peers
San Leandro, CA 2.8% 9th +0.9pp 25th 36% below peers
Indio, CA 3.5% 12th +1.4pp 26th 20% below peers
Fort Smith, AR 9.9% 27th +4.0pp 27th 127% above peers
Temple, TX 8.4% 24th +3.7pp 28th 92% above peers
Newton, MA 0.9% 1st +0.4pp 29th 80% below peers
Trenton, NJ 9.8% 26th +5.5pp 30th 124% above peers
Nashua, NH 6.8% 22nd +5.1pp 31st 54% above peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthChildren without health insurance
Loading tract map…
3 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Newport Beach, CA down 1.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Royal Oak, MI down 1.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Troy, NY down 1.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 97% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B27001) through 2024 ±1.3pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Health data →
Education
Education

Adults with a bachelor's degree or higher

▲ Higher is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

College attainment changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (49.5% then, 52.7% now; margin ±3.4pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 20 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: college attainment rose 2.5 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (50.2% to 52.7%).
52.7%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Illinois ref 37.9% +3.2pp
United States ref 35.7% +3.5pp
Lawrence, MA 16.8% 28th +6.0pp 1st 44% below peers
Hemet, CA 15.5% 30th +4.4pp 2nd 49% below peers
Trenton, NJ 16.2% 29th +4.0pp 3rd 46% below peers
Manteca, CA 21.7% 23rd +5.0pp 4th 28% below peers
Ogden, UT 25.9% 18th +5.1pp 5th 14% below peers
Merced, CA 20.2% 27th +3.7pp 6th 33% below peers
Waukegan, IL 20.9% 25th +3.5pp 7th 30% below peers
South Gate, CA 11.3% 31st +1.8pp 8th 63% below peers
Indio, CA 20.5% 26th +3.3pp 9th 32% below peers
Springdale, AR 24.2% 20th +3.9pp 10th 20% below peers
Alafaya, FL 50.0% 8th +6.8pp 11th 66% above peers
Avondale, AZ 21.3% 24th +2.8pp 12th 29% below peers
Santa Fe, NM 47.8% 9th +6.1pp 13th 59% above peers
Nashua, NH 41.2% 12th +5.1pp 14th 37% above peers
Bryan, TX 30.1% 16th +3.5pp 15th on par with peers
Bloomington, MN 46.2% 10th +4.2pp 16th 53% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 23.9% 21st +2.0pp 17th 21% below peers
Clifton, NJ 35.5% 13th +2.9pp 18th 18% above peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 28.8% 17th +2.1pp 19th 4% below peers
Troy, MI 64.8% 3rd +4.0pp 20th 115% above peers
Champaign, IL 52.7% 4th +3.2pp 21st 75% above peers
Mission Viejo, CA 52.1% 5th +3.0pp 22nd 73% above peers
Lawton, OK 22.5% 22nd +1.3pp 23rd 25% below peers
Temple, TX 30.6% 15th +1.7pp 24th 1% above peers
Santa Barbara, CA 51.9% 6th +2.7pp 25th 72% above peers
San Leandro, CA 33.3% 14th +1.6pp 26th 10% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 70.7% 2nd +2.8pp 27th 135% above peers
Norwalk, CT 44.8% 11th +1.4pp 28th 49% above peers
Newton, MA 81.1% 1st +2.0pp 29th 169% above peers
Germantown, MD 50.4% 7th +0.3pp 30th 67% above peers
Westminster, CA 25.9% 19th -1.2pp 31st 14% below peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationAdults with a bachelor's degree or higher
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Leander, TX up 12.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 95% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Grapevine, TX up 9.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 87% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Lakewood, OH up 8.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 85% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±2.7pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Education

Children ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool

▲ Higher is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Preschool enrollment changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (49.3% then, 53.8% now; margin ±16.4pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 16 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: preschool enrollment fell 2.8 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (56.6% to 53.9%).
53.8%
20112024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Illinois ref 51.1% -4.9pp
United States ref 45.5%
Bloomington, MN 59.5% 5th +23.0pp 1st 40% above peers
Bryan, TX 36.9% 21st +6.9pp 2nd 13% below peers
Temple, TX 40.2% 17th +5.7pp 3rd 5% below peers
Champaign, IL 53.9% 9th +4.6pp 4th 27% above peers
Trenton, NJ 61.4% 4th +4.5pp 5th 45% above peers
Norwalk, CT 75.6% 1st +5.3pp 6th 78% above peers
Waukegan, IL 42.7% 15th +1.7pp 7th 1% above peers
Lawrence, MA 42.4% 16th +0.9pp 8th on par with peers
Santa Fe, NM 58.1% 6th +1.0pp 9th 37% above peers
Germantown, MD 50.8% 10th -0.2pp 10th 20% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 43.5% 14th -1.9pp 11th 3% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 71.9% 2nd -5.0pp 12th 69% above peers
Ogden, UT 29.4% 27th -5.2pp 13th 31% below peers
San Leandro, CA 50.6% 12th -10.0pp 14th 19% above peers
South Gate, CA 37.4% 20th -7.4pp 15th 12% below peers
Newton, MA 67.2% 3rd -13.5pp 16th 58% above peers
Clifton, NJ 56.3% 7th -13.3pp 17th 33% above peers
Troy, MI 50.7% 11th -13.1pp 18th 20% above peers
Santa Barbara, CA 55.4% 8th -14.6pp 19th 30% above peers
Manteca, CA 31.2% 26th -12.5pp 20th 27% below peers
Lawton, OK 31.8% 25th -13.1pp 21st 25% below peers
Westminster, CA 38.8% 19th -19.0pp 22nd 9% below peers
Hemet, CA 22.6% 29th -11.4pp 23rd 47% below peers
Springdale, AR 28.9% 28th -15.0pp 24th 32% below peers
Nashua, NH 39.2% 18th -20.5pp 25th 8% below peers
Merced, CA 36.2% 22nd -19.4pp 26th 15% below peers
Mission Viejo, CA 44.0% 13th -25.8pp 27th 4% above peers
Indio, CA 21.5% 30th -16.3pp 28th 49% below peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 36.1% 23rd -29.0pp 29th 15% below peers
Alafaya, FL 31.9% 24th -31.7pp 30th 25% below peers
Avondale, AZ 14.8% 31st -22.2pp 31st 65% below peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationChildren ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool
Loading tract map…
1 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 5 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • West Haven, CT up 35.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Castle Rock, CO up 21.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 96% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Cedar Park, TX up 20.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 94% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±14.8pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Education

Teens not in school and not working

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Disconnected youth changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (2.6% then, 6.4% now; margin ±3.9pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 5 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: disconnected youth rose 4.5 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (1.9% to 6.4%).
6.4%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Illinois ref 6.6% +0.4pp
United States ref 6.9% +0.3pp
Norwalk, CT 2.0% 4th -5.1pp 1st 74% below peers
Avondale, AZ 4.2% 8th -6.6pp 2nd 47% below peers
Alafaya, FL 1.5% 3rd -2.2pp 3rd 81% below peers
Mission Viejo, CA 1.1% 2nd -1.5pp 4th 86% below peers
Clifton, NJ 2.9% 7th -3.1pp 5th 63% below peers
Newton, MA 0.7% 1st -0.7pp 6th 91% below peers
Hemet, CA 7.9% 16th -5.8pp 7th on par with peers
Bloomington, MN 2.7% 6th -1.9pp 8th 66% below peers
Lawrence, MA 11.4% 25th -4.0pp 9th 45% above peers
Nashua, NH 5.4% 11th -0.4pp 10th 32% below peers
Springdale, AR 7.3% 15th +0.4pp 11th 8% below peers
Manteca, CA 8.0% 17th +0.4pp 12th 2% above peers
Troy, MI 2.6% 5th +0.1pp 13th 67% below peers
Merced, CA 11.9% 26th +0.8pp 14th 51% above peers
Indio, CA 9.1% 19th +0.6pp 15th 15% above peers
South Gate, CA 9.4% 21st +1.0pp 16th 19% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 13.7% 30th +2.1pp 17th 74% above peers
Trenton, NJ 13.6% 29th +3.0pp 18th 73% above peers
Ogden, UT 8.1% 18th +2.0pp 19th 3% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 4.8% 10th +1.4pp 20th 39% below peers
Santa Fe, NM 9.2% 20th +2.9pp 21st 16% above peers
Temple, TX 6.5% 14th +2.6pp 22nd 18% below peers
Waukegan, IL 11.0% 24th +4.9pp 23rd 40% above peers
Germantown, MD 4.4% 9th +2.0pp 24th 45% below peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 12.1% 27th +5.7pp 25th 54% above peers
Santa Barbara, CA 10.3% 22nd +5.0pp 26th 31% above peers
San Leandro, CA 10.9% 23rd +5.9pp 27th 39% above peers
Westminster, CA 5.7% 12th +3.3pp 28th 27% below peers
Champaign, IL 6.4% 13th +3.7pp 29th 19% below peers
Lawton, OK 12.7% 28th +7.5pp 30th 62% above peers
Bryan, TX 15.6% 31st +10.5pp 31st 98% above peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationTeens not in school and not working
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B14005) through 2024 ±3.5pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Education data →
Demographics
Demographics

Population

No better direction Rising
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Population rose about 3% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 87,636 to 89,996 - more than the combined survey margin (±84). 21 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.

Rising beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 28 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: population rose about 9% from 2014 to 2024 (82,848 to 89,996).
89,996
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Temple, TX 89,602 17th +20% 1st on par with peers
Manteca, CA 89,043 21st +13% 2nd 1% below peers
Merced, CA 91,953 5th +11% 3rd 2% above peers
Lawrence, MA 88,736 23rd +11% 4th 1% below peers
Springdale, AR 88,160 25th +11% 5th 2% below peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 88,093 26th +10% 6th 2% below peers
Avondale, AZ 92,477 1st +9% 7th 3% above peers
Trenton, NJ 90,338 13th +8% 8th 1% above peers
Hemet, CA 91,326 8th +8% 9th 2% above peers
Santa Fe, NM 89,019 22nd +6% 10th 1% below peers
Clifton, NJ 89,379 18th +5% 11th on par with peers
Troy, MI 87,898 28th +5% 12th 2% below peers
Bryan, TX 87,939 27th +5% 13th 2% below peers
Norwalk, CT 92,187 3rd +4% 14th 3% above peers
Bloomington, MN 88,665 24th +4% 15th 1% below peers
Nashua, NH 91,294 9th +3% 16th 2% above peers
Indio, CA 91,950 6th +3% 17th 2% above peers
Champaign, IL 89,996 14th +3% 18th on par with peers
Fort Smith, AR 89,805 16th +2% 19th on par with peers
Waukegan, IL 89,076 19th +2% 20th 1% below peers
Alafaya, FL 92,449 2nd +2% 21st 3% above peers
Ogden, UT 87,413 31st +1% 22nd 3% below peers
Newton, MA 89,044 20th +1% 23rd 1% below peers
Germantown, MD 90,719 11th +0% 24th 1% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 91,169 10th -0% 25th 2% above peers
Westminster, CA 89,860 15th -1% 26th on par with peers
San Leandro, CA 87,826 29th -2% 27th 2% below peers
South Gate, CA 91,483 7th -3% 28th 2% above peers
Mission Viejo, CA 92,151 4th -4% 29th 3% above peers
Lawton, OK 90,595 12th -4% 30th 1% above peers
Santa Barbara, CA 87,779 30th -4% 31st 2% below peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsPopulation
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±68 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Children's share of the population

No better direction Turning down (early signal)
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Children changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (16.5% then, 15.9% now; margin ±1.3pp). The newest releases lean downward: each of the last 3 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 11 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: children fell 1.0 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (16.9% to 15.9%).
15.9%
20172024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Illinois ref 21.8% -1.0pp
United States ref 21.6% -0.7pp
Indio, CA 24.8% 8th +2.4pp 1st 9% above peers
Mission Viejo, CA 20.4% 21st +1.1pp 2nd 10% below peers
Trenton, NJ 27.8% 3rd +1.3pp 3rd 23% above peers
Santa Barbara, CA 17.7% 28th +0.8pp 4th 22% below peers
Westminster, CA 20.5% 20th +0.4pp 5th 9% below peers
Merced, CA 29.9% 1st +0.4pp 6th 32% above peers
Bloomington, MN 20.0% 22nd +0.1pp 7th 12% below peers
Lawrence, MA 26.3% 6th +0.0pp 8th 16% above peers
Temple, TX 26.6% 5th -0.2pp 9th 18% above peers
Clifton, NJ 19.7% 23rd -0.2pp 10th 13% below peers
Fort Smith, AR 23.8% 9th -0.4pp 11th 5% above peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 17.8% 27th -0.3pp 12th 21% below peers
Lawton, OK 23.0% 12th -0.7pp 13th 2% above peers
Springdale, AR 29.8% 2nd -0.9pp 14th 31% above peers
Champaign, IL 15.9% 30th -0.6pp 15th 30% below peers
Manteca, CA 25.2% 7th -1.0pp 16th 11% above peers
Troy, MI 20.6% 18th -0.9pp 17th 9% below peers
Nashua, NH 18.6% 25th -0.8pp 18th 18% below peers
San Leandro, CA 18.1% 26th -1.0pp 19th 20% below peers
Newton, MA 20.5% 19th -1.1pp 20th 9% below peers
Bryan, TX 23.3% 10th -1.5pp 21st 3% above peers
Norwalk, CT 18.8% 24th -1.3pp 22nd 17% below peers
Alafaya, FL 21.2% 17th -1.6pp 23rd 6% below peers
Santa Monica, CA 13.8% 31st -1.1pp 24th 39% below peers
Avondale, AZ 26.8% 4th -2.4pp 25th 18% above peers
Germantown, MD 23.0% 13th -2.8pp 26th 2% above peers
Hemet, CA 23.1% 11th -3.1pp 27th 2% above peers
Ogden, UT 22.6% 15th -3.6pp 28th on par with peers
Santa Fe, NM 15.9% 29th -2.9pp 29th 30% below peers
South Gate, CA 22.6% 16th -4.4pp 30th on par with peers
Waukegan, IL 22.8% 14th -5.4pp 31st 1% above peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren's share of the population
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.0pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys *Early signal: consecutive releases agree on direction only; the size of the newest movement is not measurable from overlapping surveys. about this metric
Demographics

Children in single-parent families

No better direction No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Single-parent changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (35.5% then, 37.2% now; margin ±8.4pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 6 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: single-parent rose 0.8 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (36.4% to 37.2%).
37.2%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Illinois ref 29.7% +0.0pp
United States ref 29.9% -0.2pp
Santa Barbara, CA 38.3% 10th +6.8pp 1st 18% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 25.9% 23rd +4.4pp 2nd 20% below peers
Hemet, CA 39.1% 8th +6.6pp 3rd 20% above peers
Manteca, CA 30.9% 17th +4.9pp 4th 5% below peers
Lawton, OK 47.3% 4th +6.7pp 5th 45% above peers
Waukegan, IL 46.3% 5th +5.1pp 6th 42% above peers
Merced, CA 48.8% 3rd +3.9pp 7th 50% above peers
Trenton, NJ 64.2% 1st +3.8pp 8th 97% above peers
Lawrence, MA 62.2% 2nd +3.5pp 9th 91% above peers
Troy, MI 11.4% 29th +0.6pp 10th 65% below peers
Champaign, IL 37.2% 12th +1.7pp 11th 14% above peers
Nashua, NH 30.4% 19th +0.8pp 12th 7% below peers
Norwalk, CT 28.7% 21st +0.5pp 13th 12% below peers
South Gate, CA 40.3% 6th +0.7pp 14th 24% above peers
Springdale, AR 32.8% 15th +0.5pp 15th 1% above peers
Temple, TX 34.6% 14th +0.5pp 16th 6% above peers
Westminster, CA 23.2% 26th -0.1pp 17th 29% below peers
Bloomington, MN 24.9% 24th -0.2pp 18th 24% below peers
Avondale, AZ 34.9% 13th -0.6pp 19th 7% above peers
Germantown, MD 30.4% 18th -1.5pp 20th 7% below peers
Santa Fe, NM 38.8% 9th -2.8pp 21st 19% above peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 37.2% 11th -4.0pp 22nd 14% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 32.6% 16th -4.7pp 23rd on par with peers
San Leandro, CA 23.6% 25th -3.9pp 24th 27% below peers
Bryan, TX 39.3% 7th -7.2pp 25th 21% above peers
Indio, CA 28.1% 22nd -5.4pp 26th 14% below peers
Ogden, UT 29.4% 20th -6.8pp 27th 10% below peers
Newton, MA 10.4% 31st -3.4pp 28th 68% below peers
Clifton, NJ 20.3% 27th -7.6pp 29th 38% below peers
Alafaya, FL 18.6% 28th -7.1pp 30th 43% below peers
Mission Viejo, CA 10.4% 30th -5.5pp 31st 68% below peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren in single-parent families
Loading tract map…
3 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 3 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B09002) through 2024 ±6.8pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Young children with all parents in the labor force

No better direction No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Working parents changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (73.1% then, 71.5% now; margin ±11.5pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 5 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: working parents fell 1.0 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (72.5% to 71.5%).
71.5%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Illinois ref 71.8% +2.3pp
United States ref 68.1% +1.9pp
Santa Monica, CA 86.6% 1st +21.8pp 1st 26% above peers
Santa Fe, NM 83.6% 2nd +16.3pp 2nd 21% above peers
Clifton, NJ 74.6% 10th +14.0pp 3rd 8% above peers
Merced, CA 64.6% 21st +10.6pp 4th 6% below peers
Norwalk, CT 76.9% 6th +9.7pp 5th 12% above peers
Manteca, CA 59.7% 29th +5.8pp 6th 13% below peers
Lawton, OK 61.0% 28th +5.0pp 7th 12% below peers
Nashua, NH 78.2% 5th +6.0pp 8th 13% above peers
Mission Viejo, CA 70.3% 14th +5.1pp 9th 2% above peers
Lawrence, MA 80.3% 3rd +5.3pp 10th 16% above peers
Trenton, NJ 69.3% 15th +4.4pp 11th 1% above peers
Troy, MI 58.3% 31st +3.6pp 12th 15% below peers
Hemet, CA 64.3% 24th +3.6pp 13th 7% below peers
Waukegan, IL 74.9% 9th +3.5pp 14th 9% above peers
Ogden, UT 66.0% 20th +2.9pp 15th 4% below peers
Avondale, AZ 67.6% 17th +2.9pp 16th 2% below peers
Temple, TX 61.5% 27th +2.4pp 17th 11% below peers
Bryan, TX 66.0% 19th +2.5pp 18th 4% below peers
Germantown, MD 75.7% 8th +2.7pp 19th 10% above peers
South Gate, CA 73.5% 11th +1.8pp 20th 7% above peers
Springdale, AR 64.4% 23rd +1.3pp 21st 7% below peers
Santa Barbara, CA 71.5% 12th +1.2pp 22nd 4% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 66.9% 18th +0.7pp 23rd 3% below peers
Newton, MA 78.2% 4th -0.0pp 24th 13% above peers
Champaign, IL 71.5% 13th -1.6pp 25th 4% above peers
Westminster, CA 62.7% 25th -1.8pp 26th 9% below peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 69.0% 16th -3.4pp 27th on par with peers
Bloomington, MN 76.0% 7th -5.0pp 28th 10% above peers
Indio, CA 64.5% 22nd -5.4pp 29th 6% below peers
Alafaya, FL 61.9% 26th -9.1pp 30th 10% below peers
San Leandro, CA 58.5% 30th -14.5pp 31st 15% below peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsYoung children with all parents in the labor force
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 4 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B23008) through 2024 ±9.3pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Demographics data →