The most recent 12 months moved against the better direction, whatever the longer window shows. The checks below judge the multi-year window. It is also worsening faster than most of the selected peers.
Violent crime rose about 5% over the 12 months ending May 2026, faster than 82% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 456 (Apr 26) | -9.3% | |||||
| Danbury, CT | 93 (May 26) | 4th | -68.2% | 1st | 69% below peers | ||
| Clifton, NJ | 127 (May 26) | 7th | -32.0% | 2nd | 58% below peers | ||
| Santa Fe, NM | 70 (May 26) | 2nd | -22.9% | 3rd | 77% below peers | ||
| Bloomington, MN | 226 (May 26) | 9th | -21.0% | 4th | 25% below peers | ||
| Champaign, IL | 382 (May 26) | 12th | -18.0% | 5th | 27% above peers | ||
| Troy, MI | 94 (May 26) | 5th | -15.2% | 6th | 69% below peers | ||
| Norwalk, CT | 57 (Apr 26) | 1st | -14.3% | 7th | 81% below peers | ||
| Temple, TX | 301 (Jan 25) | 10th | -13.3% | 8th | on par with peers | ||
| Merced, CA | 708 (May 26) | 17th | -5.9% | 9th | 135% above peers | ||
| Santa Monica, CA | 646 (May 26) | 16th | -3.2% | 10th | 115% above peers | ||
| Lawrence, MA | 402 (May 26) | 13th | -0.8% | 11th | 34% above peers | ||
| Ogden, UT | 470 (May 26) | 15th | +1.5% | 12th | 56% above peers | ||
| Mission Viejo, CA | 110 (May 26) | 6th | +1.8% | 13th | 64% below peers | ||
| Westminster, CA | 412 (May 26) | 14th | +4.2% | 14th | 37% above peers | ||
| Fort Smith, AR | 846 (May 26) | 18th | +5.3% | 15th | 181% above peers | ||
| Manteca, CA | 318 (May 26) | 11th | +12.8% | 16th | 6% above peers | ||
| Nashua, NH | 155 (Jan 25) | 8th | +25.4% | 17th | 48% below peers | ||
| Newton, MA | 78 (Dec 25) | 3rd | +61.4% | 18th | 74% below peers |
This badge answers one question: can this city's own trend be trusted as a real improvement? It passed all three checks, so yes. The most recent 12 months agree with the multi-year trend.
Property crime fell about 13% over the 12 months ending May 2026, slower than 59% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 1,987 (Apr 26) | -12.2% | |||||
| Mission Viejo, CA | 737 (May 26) | 2nd | -34.5% | 1st | 57% below peers | ||
| Danbury, CT | 885 (May 26) | 4th | -30.7% | 2nd | 48% below peers | ||
| Norwalk, CT | 997 (Apr 26) | 6th | -25.8% | 3rd | 41% below peers | ||
| Clifton, NJ | 1,700 (May 26) | 10th | -23.2% | 4th | on par with peers | ||
| Lawrence, MA | 803 (May 26) | 3rd | -21.9% | 5th | 53% below peers | ||
| Santa Fe, NM | 3,809 (May 26) | 17th | -19.9% | 6th | 124% above peers | ||
| Westminster, CA | 2,047 (May 26) | 11th | -19.4% | 7th | 20% above peers | ||
| Troy, MI | 930 (May 26) | 5th | -17.9% | 8th | 45% below peers | ||
| Newton, MA | 504 (Dec 25) | 1st | -15.0% | 9th | 70% below peers | ||
| Santa Monica, CA | 3,848 (May 26) | 18th | -14.5% | 10th | 126% above peers | ||
| Fort Smith, AR | 3,123 (May 26) | 16th | -12.7% | 11th | 84% above peers | ||
| Merced, CA | 2,452 (May 26) | 14th | -6.1% | 12th | 44% above peers | ||
| Ogden, UT | 1,685 (May 26) | 9th | -5.2% | 13th | 1% below peers | ||
| Champaign, IL | 2,092 (May 26) | 12th | -3.8% | 14th | 23% above peers | ||
| Bloomington, MN | 2,896 (May 26) | 15th | -2.2% | 15th | 70% above peers | ||
| Manteca, CA | 1,415 (May 26) | 8th | +11.0% | 16th | 17% below peers | ||
| Nashua, NH | 1,267 (Jan 25) | 7th | +12.8% | 17th | 25% below peers | ||
| Temple, TX | 2,203 (Jan 25) | 13th | +17.0% | 18th | 30% above peers |
This badge answers one question: can this city's own trend be trusted as a real improvement? It is moving the right way, but at least one check failed, so not yet.
Homicide was essentially flat over the 12 months ending May 2026.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 6 (Apr 26) | -17.8% | |||||
| Clifton, NJ | 0 (May 26) | 1st | -100.0% | 1st | 100% below peers | ||
| Bloomington, MN | 0 (May 26) | 2nd | -100.0% | 2nd | 100% below peers | ||
| Nashua, NH | 0 (Jan 25) | 3rd | -100.0% | 3rd | 100% below peers | ||
| Troy, MI | 0 (May 26) | 4th | -100.0% | 4th | 100% below peers | ||
| Mission Viejo, CA | 0 (May 26) | 5th | -100.0% | 5th | 100% below peers | ||
| Danbury, CT | 0 (May 26) | 6th | -100.0% | 6th | 100% below peers | ||
| Santa Monica, CA | 4 (May 26) | 12th | -50.1% | 7th | 98% above peers | ||
| Westminster, CA | 2 (May 26) | 10th | -33.3% | 8th | on par with peers | ||
| Lawrence, MA | 4 (May 26) | 13th | -20.1% | 9th | 100% above peers | ||
| Fort Smith, AR | 4 (May 26) | 11th | +0.0% | 10th | 96% above peers | ||
| Champaign, IL | 6 (May 26) | 14th | +0.0% | 11th | 188% above peers | ||
| Manteca, CA | 1 (May 26) | 9th | +0.0% | 12th | 54% below peers | ||
| Santa Fe, NM | 9 (May 26) | 16th | +14.3% | 13th | 292% above peers | ||
| Temple, TX | 11 (Jan 25) | 17th | +83.3% | 14th | 391% above peers | ||
| Merced, CA | 12 (May 26) | 18th | +100.2% | 15th | 444% above peers | ||
| Ogden, UT | 8 (May 26) | 15th | +133.5% | 16th | 251% above peers | ||
| Newton, MA | 0 (Dec 25) | 7th | 100% below peers | ||||
| Norwalk, CT | 0 (Apr 26) | 8th | 100% below peers |
This badge answers one question: can this city's own trend be trusted as a real improvement? It passed all three checks, so yes. The most recent 12 months agree with the multi-year trend.
Vehicle theft fell about 24% over the 12 months ending May 2026, faster than 53% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 303 (Apr 26) | -22.2% | |||||
| Santa Fe, NM | 320 (May 26) | 16th | -49.9% | 1st | 111% above peers | ||
| Danbury, CT | 74 (May 26) | 3rd | -33.3% | 2nd | 51% below peers | ||
| Newton, MA | 23 (Dec 25) | 1st | -32.3% | 3rd | 85% below peers | ||
| Merced, CA | 274 (May 26) | 15th | -31.8% | 4th | 81% above peers | ||
| Clifton, NJ | 163 (May 26) | 11th | -30.0% | 5th | 7% above peers | ||
| Champaign, IL | 152 (May 26) | 10th | -29.5% | 6th | on par with peers | ||
| Santa Monica, CA | 375 (May 26) | 18th | -29.3% | 7th | 147% above peers | ||
| Lawrence, MA | 76 (May 26) | 4th | -27.7% | 8th | 50% below peers | ||
| Fort Smith, AR | 227 (May 26) | 12th | -24.3% | 9th | 49% above peers | ||
| Bloomington, MN | 110 (May 26) | 7th | -23.0% | 10th | 27% below peers | ||
| Norwalk, CT | 116 (Apr 26) | 8th | -18.7% | 11th | 24% below peers | ||
| Mission Viejo, CA | 90 (May 26) | 6th | -15.6% | 12th | 41% below peers | ||
| Troy, MI | 62 (May 26) | 2nd | -12.5% | 13th | 59% below peers | ||
| Ogden, UT | 149 (May 26) | 9th | -8.3% | 14th | 2% below peers | ||
| Temple, TX | 321 (Jan 25) | 17th | -1.2% | 15th | 112% above peers | ||
| Westminster, CA | 250 (May 26) | 14th | +0.0% | 16th | 65% above peers | ||
| Manteca, CA | 239 (May 26) | 13th | +6.9% | 17th | 57% above peers | ||
| Nashua, NH | 86 (Jan 25) | 5th | +36.2% | 18th | 43% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Household income rose about 31% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from $41,724 to $54,816 (each survey's own dollars, not adjusted for inflation) - more than the combined survey margin (±$3,288). 30 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas ref | $60,773 | +28% | |||||
| United States ref | $80,734 | +28% | |||||
| Trenton, NJ | $52,537 | 31st | +48% | 1st | 32% below peers | ||
| Hemet, CA | $57,719 | 27th | +45% | 2nd | 25% below peers | ||
| Ogden, UT | $72,575 | 19th | +45% | 3rd | 6% below peers | ||
| Waukegan, IL | $71,919 | 20th | +44% | 4th | 7% below peers | ||
| Indio, CA | $77,167 | 16th | +44% | 5th | on par with peers | ||
| South Gate, CA | $74,571 | 17th | +43% | 6th | 3% below peers | ||
| Merced, CA | $63,122 | 23rd | +40% | 7th | 18% below peers | ||
| Springdale, AR | $69,787 | 21st | +39% | 8th | 10% below peers | ||
| Santa Barbara, CA | $106,182 | 7th | +39% | 9th | 38% above peers | ||
| Westminster, CA | $85,541 | 14th | +37% | 10th | 11% above peers | ||
| Lawrence, MA | $60,433 | 24th | +35% | 11th | 22% below peers | ||
| Alafaya, FL | $100,950 | 9th | +34% | 12th | 31% above peers | ||
| Manteca, CA | $97,055 | 11th | +33% | 13th | 26% above peers | ||
| Fort Smith, AR | $54,816 | 29th | +31% | 14th | 29% below peers | ||
| San Leandro, CA | $101,420 | 8th | +30% | 15th | 31% above peers | ||
| Bryan, TX | $59,289 | 26th | +30% | 16th | 23% below peers | ||
| Nashua, NH | $96,326 | 12th | +28% | 17th | 25% above peers | ||
| Clifton, NJ | $98,237 | 10th | +28% | 18th | 27% above peers | ||
| Santa Fe, NM | $73,482 | 18th | +27% | 19th | 5% below peers | ||
| Newton, MA | $190,304 | 1st | +26% | 20th | 147% above peers | ||
| Norwalk, CT | $107,616 | 6th | +25% | 21st | 39% above peers | ||
| Germantown, MD | $117,546 | 4th | +24% | 22nd | 52% above peers | ||
| Temple, TX | $68,204 | 22nd | +24% | 23rd | 12% below peers | ||
| Deerfield Beach, FL | $59,730 | 25th | +24% | 24th | 23% below peers | ||
| Bloomington, MN | $93,211 | 13th | +24% | 25th | 21% above peers | ||
| Santa Monica, CA | $114,885 | 5th | +19% | 26th | 49% above peers | ||
| Troy, MI | $120,045 | 3rd | +18% | 27th | 56% above peers | ||
| Champaign, IL | $56,118 | 28th | +16% | 28th | 27% below peers | ||
| Mission Viejo, CA | $136,123 | 2nd | +15% | 29th | 76% above peers | ||
| Lawton, OK | $54,433 | 30th | +14% | 30th | 29% below peers | ||
| Danbury, CT | $83,393 | 15th | +14% | 31st | 8% above peers |
Moving against the better direction for this metric. It is also worsening faster than most of the selected peers.
Unemployment rose about 0.4 percentage points a year from 2022 to 2025. That is movement in the wrong direction.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas ref | 4.2% (May 26) | +0.2pp | ||||
| United States ref | 4.2% (Jun 26) | +0.1pp | ||||
| Trenton, NJ | 6.3% (May 26) | 27th | -1.5pp | 1st | 57% above peers | |
| Clifton, NJ | 4.0% (May 26) | 12th | -0.9pp | 2nd | on par with peers | |
| Merced, CA | 6.8% (May 26) | 29th | -0.9pp | 3rd | 70% above peers | |
| Westminster, CA | 3.8% (May 26) | 8th | -0.7pp | 4th | 5% below peers | |
| Newton, MA | 3.7% (May 26) | 6th | -0.5pp | 5th | 7% below peers | |
| San Leandro, CA | 4.0% (May 26) | 13th | -0.5pp | 6th | on par with peers | |
| Indio, CA | 4.5% (May 26) | 19th | -0.5pp | 7th | 12% above peers | |
| Hemet, CA | 6.3% (May 26) | 28th | -0.4pp | 8th | 57% above peers | |
| South Gate, CA | 4.6% (May 26) | 22nd | -0.4pp | 9th | 15% above peers | |
| Lawrence, MA | 5.9% (May 26) | 26th | -0.4pp | 10th | 48% above peers | |
| Manteca, CA | 5.1% (May 26) | 23rd | -0.3pp | 11th | 27% above peers | |
| Nashua, NH | 3.2% (May 26) | 3rd | -0.3pp | 12th | 20% below peers | |
| Santa Barbara, CA | 2.7% (May 26) | 1st | -0.2pp | 13th | 32% below peers | |
| Mission Viejo, CA | 3.6% (May 26) | 5th | -0.2pp | 14th | 10% below peers | |
| Santa Monica, CA | 5.4% (May 26) | 25th | -0.2pp | 15th | 35% above peers | |
| Ogden, UT | 3.8% (May 26) | 9th | +0.1pp | 16th | 5% below peers | |
| Fort Smith, AR | 3.7% (May 26) | 7th | +0.1pp | 17th | 7% below peers | |
| Springdale, AR | 3.0% (May 26) | 2nd | +0.1pp | 18th | 25% below peers | |
| Bryan, TX | 3.5% (May 26) | 4th | +0.2pp | 19th | 12% below peers | |
| Temple, TX | 4.3% (May 26) | 16th | +0.4pp | 20th | 7% above peers | |
| Bloomington, MN | 4.0% (May 26) | 14th | +0.4pp | 21st | on par with peers | |
| Waukegan, IL | 4.4% (May 26) | 18th | +0.4pp | 22nd | 10% above peers | |
| Santa Fe, NM | 3.8% (May 26) | 10th | +0.6pp | 23rd | 5% below peers | |
| Champaign, IL | 4.0% (May 26) | 15th | +0.6pp | 24th | on par with peers | |
| Troy, MI | 3.9% (May 26) | 11th | +0.7pp | 25th | 3% below peers | |
| Deerfield Beach, FL | 4.3% (May 26) | 17th | +1.0pp | 26th | 7% above peers | |
| Norwalk, CT | 4.5% (May 26) | 20th | +1.0pp | 27th | 12% above peers | |
| Danbury, CT | 4.5% (May 26) | 21st | +1.0pp | 28th | 12% above peers | |
| Lawton, OK | 5.2% (May 26) | 24th | +1.6pp | 29th | 30% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Poverty fell 2.7 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 20.7% to 18.0% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.5pp). 8 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas ref | 15.3% | -1.1pp | |||||
| United States ref | 12.0% | ||||||
| Indio, CA | 11.4% | 14th | -5.0pp | 1st | 11% below peers | ||
| Hemet, CA | 14.8% | 21st | -6.2pp | 2nd | 16% above peers | ||
| South Gate, CA | 12.7% | 15th | -4.4pp | 3rd | on par with peers | ||
| Trenton, NJ | 20.9% | 28th | -6.8pp | 4th | 64% above peers | ||
| Springdale, AR | 13.2% | 17th | -4.2pp | 5th | 4% above peers | ||
| Ogden, UT | 13.3% | 18th | -3.5pp | 6th | 5% above peers | ||
| Clifton, NJ | 7.9% | 5th | -1.8pp | 7th | 38% below peers | ||
| Merced, CA | 23.6% | 31st | -5.3pp | 8th | 86% above peers | ||
| Lawrence, MA | 17.4% | 25th | -3.6pp | 9th | 37% above peers | ||
| Manteca, CA | 9.5% | 11th | -1.9pp | 10th | 26% below peers | ||
| Nashua, NH | 7.7% | 4th | -1.4pp | 11th | 39% below peers | ||
| San Leandro, CA | 8.2% | 6th | -1.3pp | 12th | 35% below peers | ||
| Fort Smith, AR | 18.0% | 26th | -2.7pp | 13th | 41% above peers | ||
| Waukegan, IL | 15.0% | 23rd | -2.2pp | 14th | 18% above peers | ||
| Alafaya, FL | 9.3% | 10th | -1.2pp | 15th | 27% below peers | ||
| Norwalk, CT | 9.1% | 8th | -1.0pp | 16th | 29% below peers | ||
| Westminster, CA | 14.3% | 20th | -1.1pp | 17th | 12% above peers | ||
| Deerfield Beach, FL | 14.8% | 22nd | -1.1pp | 18th | 16% above peers | ||
| Santa Fe, NM | 12.7% | 16th | -0.6pp | 19th | on par with peers | ||
| Temple, TX | 15.8% | 24th | -0.1pp | 20th | 24% above peers | ||
| Bryan, TX | 22.1% | 29th | +0.4pp | 21st | 74% above peers | ||
| Champaign, IL | 23.4% | 30th | +0.7pp | 22nd | 84% above peers | ||
| Danbury, CT | 11.4% | 13th | +0.4pp | 23rd | 11% below peers | ||
| Mission Viejo, CA | 5.6% | 3rd | +0.3pp | 24th | 56% below peers | ||
| Newton, MA | 4.2% | 1st | +0.2pp | 25th | 67% below peers | ||
| Troy, MI | 5.4% | 2nd | +0.3pp | 26th | 58% below peers | ||
| Santa Barbara, CA | 13.9% | 19th | +1.5pp | 27th | 9% above peers | ||
| Santa Monica, CA | 11.1% | 12th | +1.2pp | 28th | 13% below peers | ||
| Lawton, OK | 18.9% | 27th | +2.4pp | 29th | 49% above peers | ||
| Bloomington, MN | 9.1% | 9th | +1.7pp | 30th | 29% below peers | ||
| Germantown, MD | 8.8% | 7th | +2.2pp | 31st | 31% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Child poverty fell 7.5 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 30.1% to 22.6% - more than the combined survey margin (±4.0pp). 10 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas ref | 21.1% | -2.6pp | |||||
| United States ref | 16.1% | ||||||
| Clifton, NJ | 7.4% | 5th | -7.8pp | 1st | 56% below peers | ||
| San Leandro, CA | 7.0% | 4th | -5.7pp | 2nd | 58% below peers | ||
| South Gate, CA | 14.6% | 13th | -9.6pp | 3rd | 12% below peers | ||
| Manteca, CA | 9.1% | 8th | -5.7pp | 4th | 45% below peers | ||
| Hemet, CA | 17.7% | 20th | -10.7pp | 5th | 6% above peers | ||
| Newton, MA | 1.9% | 1st | -1.0pp | 6th | 89% below peers | ||
| Springdale, AR | 18.2% | 21st | -8.7pp | 7th | 9% above peers | ||
| Trenton, NJ | 26.3% | 28th | -12.2pp | 8th | 58% above peers | ||
| Troy, MI | 3.6% | 2nd | -1.4pp | 9th | 78% below peers | ||
| Deerfield Beach, FL | 16.7% | 16th | -6.5pp | 10th | on par with peers | ||
| Indio, CA | 17.6% | 19th | -6.4pp | 11th | 5% above peers | ||
| Fort Smith, AR | 22.6% | 25th | -7.5pp | 12th | 36% above peers | ||
| Nashua, NH | 9.7% | 9th | -2.3pp | 13th | 42% below peers | ||
| Alafaya, FL | 8.5% | 7th | -1.8pp | 14th | 49% below peers | ||
| Merced, CA | 33.4% | 31st | -5.5pp | 15th | 100% above peers | ||
| Temple, TX | 20.9% | 24th | -3.3pp | 16th | 26% above peers | ||
| Westminster, CA | 17.1% | 18th | -2.4pp | 17th | 3% above peers | ||
| Lawrence, MA | 24.1% | 26th | -2.7pp | 18th | 45% above peers | ||
| Bryan, TX | 29.6% | 30th | -3.3pp | 19th | 78% above peers | ||
| Ogden, UT | 19.4% | 23rd | -1.9pp | 20th | 16% above peers | ||
| Norwalk, CT | 12.7% | 10th | -1.1pp | 21st | 24% below peers | ||
| Champaign, IL | 15.7% | 14th | -1.2pp | 22nd | 6% below peers | ||
| Waukegan, IL | 24.5% | 27th | -1.5pp | 23rd | 47% above peers | ||
| Mission Viejo, CA | 5.5% | 3rd | -0.3pp | 24th | 67% below peers | ||
| Santa Fe, NM | 19.0% | 22nd | -1.0pp | 25th | 14% above peers | ||
| Danbury, CT | 16.8% | 17th | -0.4pp | 26th | 1% above peers | ||
| Lawton, OK | 28.7% | 29th | +2.3pp | 27th | 72% above peers | ||
| Bloomington, MN | 13.1% | 11th | +3.2pp | 28th | 22% below peers | ||
| Santa Barbara, CA | 15.9% | 15th | +4.4pp | 29th | 4% below peers | ||
| Santa Monica, CA | 7.7% | 6th | +2.4pp | 30th | 54% below peers | ||
| Germantown, MD | 14.2% | 12th | +5.2pp | 31st | 15% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Broadband rose 10.4 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 75.0% to 85.4% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.7pp). 28 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas ref | 86.9% | +13.4pp | |||||
| United States ref | 91.1% | ||||||
| Trenton, NJ | 82.0% | 31st | +18.1pp | 1st | 12% below peers | ||
| Springdale, AR | 91.2% | 21st | +18.5pp | 2nd | 2% below peers | ||
| Lawrence, MA | 84.9% | 30th | +12.7pp | 3rd | 9% below peers | ||
| Hemet, CA | 88.9% | 26th | +11.8pp | 4th | 4% below peers | ||
| Ogden, UT | 93.9% | 9th | +12.4pp | 5th | 1% above peers | ||
| Fort Smith, AR | 85.4% | 29th | +10.4pp | 6th | 8% below peers | ||
| Indio, CA | 93.2% | 14th | +10.4pp | 7th | on par with peers | ||
| Santa Fe, NM | 91.9% | 17th | +9.7pp | 8th | 1% below peers | ||
| Temple, TX | 90.6% | 23rd | +8.9pp | 9th | 2% below peers | ||
| Bryan, TX | 87.1% | 28th | +8.4pp | 10th | 6% below peers | ||
| Clifton, NJ | 91.4% | 19th | +8.4pp | 11th | 2% below peers | ||
| Champaign, IL | 91.5% | 18th | +7.2pp | 12th | 1% below peers | ||
| South Gate, CA | 90.9% | 22nd | +7.0pp | 13th | 2% below peers | ||
| Lawton, OK | 90.3% | 24th | +6.5pp | 14th | 3% below peers | ||
| Westminster, CA | 93.6% | 10th | +6.6pp | 15th | 1% above peers | ||
| Merced, CA | 94.3% | 6th | +6.6pp | 16th | 2% above peers | ||
| San Leandro, CA | 93.5% | 12th | +6.4pp | 17th | 1% above peers | ||
| Waukegan, IL | 90.1% | 25th | +6.1pp | 18th | 3% below peers | ||
| Santa Barbara, CA | 94.0% | 8th | +5.8pp | 19th | 1% above peers | ||
| Manteca, CA | 93.6% | 11th | +5.4pp | 20th | 1% above peers | ||
| Bloomington, MN | 92.8% | 16th | +5.1pp | 21st | on par with peers | ||
| Danbury, CT | 91.3% | 20th | +4.5pp | 22nd | 2% below peers | ||
| Deerfield Beach, FL | 87.4% | 27th | +4.2pp | 23rd | 6% below peers | ||
| Nashua, NH | 93.4% | 13th | +3.8pp | 24th | 1% above peers | ||
| Santa Monica, CA | 94.2% | 7th | +3.0pp | 25th | 1% above peers | ||
| Newton, MA | 96.9% | 2nd | +3.1pp | 26th | 4% above peers | ||
| Norwalk, CT | 93.0% | 15th | +2.6pp | 27th | on par with peers | ||
| Germantown, MD | 96.6% | 3rd | +2.5pp | 28th | 4% above peers | ||
| Mission Viejo, CA | 97.1% | 1st | +2.5pp | 29th | 5% above peers | ||
| Troy, MI | 96.0% | 4th | +2.4pp | 30th | 3% above peers | ||
| Alafaya, FL | 95.2% | 5th | +1.6pp | 31st | 3% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Inequality changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (0.49 then, 0.52 now; margin ±0.07).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas ref | 0.48 | +0.003 | |||||
| United States ref | 0.48 | +0.001 | |||||
| Indio, CA | 0.43 | 7th | -0.036 | 1st | 6% below peers | ||
| Ogden, UT | 0.43 | 8th | -0.024 | 2nd | 5% below peers | ||
| Westminster, CA | 0.47 | 19th | -0.019 | 3rd | 3% above peers | ||
| Alafaya, FL | 0.38 | 1st | -0.014 | 4th | 16% below peers | ||
| Lawton, OK | 0.44 | 10th | -0.013 | 5th | 4% below peers | ||
| Temple, TX | 0.45 | 14th | -0.010 | 6th | 1% below peers | ||
| Germantown, MD | 0.40 | 2nd | -0.009 | 7th | 12% below peers | ||
| Lawrence, MA | 0.46 | 17th | -0.010 | 8th | on par with peers | ||
| Merced, CA | 0.47 | 18th | -0.008 | 9th | 3% above peers | ||
| Santa Monica, CA | 0.54 | 30th | -0.007 | 10th | 19% above peers | ||
| Norwalk, CT | 0.49 | 26th | -0.006 | 11th | 8% above peers | ||
| Nashua, NH | 0.44 | 11th | -0.001 | 12th | 4% below peers | ||
| Santa Fe, NM | 0.48 | 23rd | +0.000 | 13th | 5% above peers | ||
| Bryan, TX | 0.47 | 21st | +0.002 | 14th | 3% above peers | ||
| Mission Viejo, CA | 0.41 | 3rd | +0.003 | 15th | 10% below peers | ||
| Waukegan, IL | 0.44 | 12th | +0.005 | 16th | 3% below peers | ||
| Trenton, NJ | 0.53 | 29th | +0.009 | 17th | 15% above peers | ||
| Manteca, CA | 0.41 | 4th | +0.008 | 18th | 9% below peers | ||
| Troy, MI | 0.42 | 6th | +0.009 | 19th | 7% below peers | ||
| Bloomington, MN | 0.43 | 9th | +0.011 | 20th | 5% below peers | ||
| Newton, MA | 0.49 | 24th | +0.012 | 21st | 7% above peers | ||
| Springdale, AR | 0.46 | 16th | +0.012 | 22nd | on par with peers | ||
| Champaign, IL | 0.56 | 31st | +0.015 | 23rd | 23% above peers | ||
| Santa Barbara, CA | 0.50 | 27th | +0.019 | 24th | 9% above peers | ||
| South Gate, CA | 0.42 | 5th | +0.018 | 25th | 7% below peers | ||
| San Leandro, CA | 0.45 | 13th | +0.020 | 26th | 1% below peers | ||
| Hemet, CA | 0.47 | 22nd | +0.027 | 27th | 4% above peers | ||
| Clifton, NJ | 0.45 | 15th | +0.027 | 28th | on par with peers | ||
| Danbury, CT | 0.47 | 20th | +0.029 | 29th | 3% above peers | ||
| Deerfield Beach, FL | 0.49 | 25th | +0.031 | 30th | 8% above peers | ||
| Fort Smith, AR | 0.52 | 28th | +0.034 | 31st | 14% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
SNAP fell 3.6 percentage points between the 2014-2018 and 2019-2023 surveys, from 16.7% to 13.2% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.2pp). 4 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
| Place | Latest2019-2023 survey | Today's rank | Change2014-2018 → 2019-2023 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas ref | 10.5% | -2.3pp | |||||
| United States ref | 11.8% | -0.5pp | |||||
| Springdale, AR | 6.0% | 5th | -5.2pp | 1st | 47% below peers | ||
| Ogden, UT | 11.6% | 17th | -4.4pp | 2nd | 2% above peers | ||
| Nashua, NH | 7.2% | 7th | -2.6pp | 3rd | 36% below peers | ||
| Fort Smith, AR | 13.2% | 20th | -3.6pp | 4th | 16% above peers | ||
| Manteca, CA | 8.8% | 10th | -2.0pp | 5th | 22% below peers | ||
| Temple, TX | 14.2% | 21st | -2.3pp | 6th | 25% above peers | ||
| Waukegan, IL | 18.5% | 25th | -2.0pp | 7th | 63% above peers | ||
| Alafaya, FL | 8.6% | 9th | -0.8pp | 8th | 24% below peers | ||
| Clifton, NJ | 11.2% | 15th | -1.0pp | 9th | 1% below peers | ||
| Trenton, NJ | 26.1% | 29th | -0.1pp | 10th | 131% above peers | ||
| Bryan, TX | 13.1% | 19th | +0.1pp | 11th | 16% above peers | ||
| Deerfield Beach, FL | 14.5% | 22nd | +0.4pp | 12th | 28% above peers | ||
| Champaign, IL | 9.7% | 12th | +0.3pp | 13th | 15% below peers | ||
| Newton, MA | 4.4% | 1st | +0.2pp | 14th | 61% below peers | ||
| Bloomington, MN | 5.9% | 4th | +0.2pp | 15th | 48% below peers | ||
| Germantown, MD | 8.9% | 11th | +0.4pp | 16th | 21% below peers | ||
| Lawton, OK | 18.7% | 26th | +1.0pp | 17th | 66% above peers | ||
| Lawrence, MA | 43.9% | 31st | +3.1pp | 18th | 289% above peers | ||
| Santa Fe, NM | 12.4% | 18th | +1.2pp | 19th | 10% above peers | ||
| Hemet, CA | 19.9% | 27th | +2.5pp | 20th | 76% above peers | ||
| Danbury, CT | 10.9% | 14th | +1.4pp | 21st | 3% below peers | ||
| Merced, CA | 30.0% | 30th | +4.9pp | 22nd | 165% above peers | ||
| Troy, MI | 5.2% | 3rd | +0.9pp | 23rd | 54% below peers | ||
| South Gate, CA | 20.3% | 28th | +3.6pp | 24th | 79% above peers | ||
| Westminster, CA | 14.5% | 23rd | +2.8pp | 25th | 29% above peers | ||
| Norwalk, CT | 10.2% | 13th | +2.3pp | 26th | 10% below peers | ||
| San Leandro, CA | 11.3% | 16th | +2.8pp | 27th | on par with peers | ||
| Santa Barbara, CA | 7.3% | 8th | +2.5pp | 28th | 35% below peers | ||
| Santa Monica, CA | 6.0% | 6th | +3.2pp | 29th | 47% below peers | ||
| Indio, CA | 17.3% | 24th | +9.4pp | 30th | 53% above peers | ||
| Mission Viejo, CA | 4.9% | 2nd | +3.2pp | 31st | 57% below peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers. It is rising faster than most of the selected peers.
Home value rose about 4% over the 12 months ending June 2026, faster than 76% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas ref | $228,662 (Jun 26) | +3.5% | ||||
| United States ref | $372,995 (Jun 26) | +0.8% | ||||
| Waukegan, IL | $247,565 (Jun 26) | 27th | +7.0% | 1st | 50% below peers | |
| Lawton, OK | $142,204 (Jun 26) | 30th | +5.6% | 2nd | 71% below peers | |
| Norwalk, CT | $679,881 (Jun 26) | 8th | +5.0% | 3rd | 37% above peers | |
| Champaign, IL | $241,516 (Jun 26) | 28th | +4.9% | 4th | 51% below peers | |
| Springdale, AR | $342,727 (Jun 26) | 23rd | +3.9% | 5th | 31% below peers | |
| Danbury, CT | $496,969 (Jun 26) | 15th | +3.8% | 6th | on par with peers | |
| Clifton, NJ | $616,096 (Jun 26) | 9th | +3.6% | 7th | 24% above peers | |
| Fort Smith, AR | $197,471 (Jun 26) | 29th | +3.5% | 8th | 60% below peers | |
| Nashua, NH | $517,357 (Jun 26) | 13th | +3.3% | 9th | 4% above peers | |
| Westminster, CA | $1,104,016 (Jun 26) | 5th | +3.3% | 10th | 122% above peers | |
| Santa Barbara, CA | $1,834,551 (Jun 26) | 1st | +3.0% | 11th | 269% above peers | |
| Troy, MI | $472,471 (Jun 26) | 16th | +2.6% | 12th | 5% below peers | |
| South Gate, CA | $701,329 (Jun 26) | 7th | +2.4% | 13th | 41% above peers | |
| Bloomington, MN | $370,580 (Jun 26) | 21st | +2.3% | 14th | 25% below peers | |
| Lawrence, MA | $521,895 (Jun 26) | 12th | +2.2% | 15th | 5% above peers | |
| Newton, MA | $1,564,706 (Jun 26) | 3rd | +2.0% | 16th | 215% above peers | |
| Bryan, TX | $277,011 (Jun 26) | 24th | +0.9% | 17th | 44% below peers | |
| Santa Monica, CA | $1,698,037 (Jun 26) | 2nd | +0.8% | 18th | 242% above peers | |
| Mission Viejo, CA | $1,224,499 (Jun 26) | 4th | +0.8% | 19th | 146% above peers | |
| Ogden, UT | $401,774 (Jun 26) | 19th | +0.6% | 20th | 19% below peers | |
| Santa Fe, NM | $589,611 (Jun 26) | 10th | +0.3% | 21st | 19% above peers | |
| Hemet, CA | $445,921 (Jun 26) | 17th | -0.1% | 22nd | 10% below peers | |
| Merced, CA | $397,690 (Jun 26) | 20th | -1.5% | 23rd | 20% below peers | |
| Indio, CA | $513,884 (Jun 26) | 14th | -1.5% | 24th | 3% above peers | |
| Trenton, NJ | $356,470 (Jun 26) | 22nd | -1.9% | 25th | 28% below peers | |
| Temple, TX | $249,750 (Jun 26) | 26th | -2.8% | 26th | 50% below peers | |
| Germantown, MD | $425,701 (Jun 26) | 18th | -2.8% | 27th | 14% below peers | |
| San Leandro, CA | $815,011 (Jun 26) | 6th | -3.1% | 28th | 64% above peers | |
| Manteca, CA | $585,227 (Jun 26) | 11th | -4.2% | 29th | 18% above peers | |
| Deerfield Beach, FL | $272,664 (Jun 26) | 25th | -5.0% | 30th | 45% below peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers. It is rising faster than most of the selected peers.
Starter homes rose about 4% over the 12 months ending June 2026, faster than 79% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas ref | $116,846 (Jun 26) | +4.8% | ||||
| United States ref | $202,486 (Jun 26) | +2.0% | ||||
| Waukegan, IL | $199,539 (Jun 26) | 24th | +9.9% | 1st | 42% below peers | |
| Champaign, IL | $157,490 (Jun 26) | 27th | +6.8% | 2nd | 54% below peers | |
| Lawton, OK | $74,294 (Jun 26) | 30th | +5.6% | 3rd | 79% below peers | |
| Clifton, NJ | $523,401 (Jun 26) | 8th | +5.2% | 4th | 51% above peers | |
| Springdale, AR | $263,332 (Jun 26) | 22nd | +5.0% | 5th | 24% below peers | |
| Norwalk, CT | $439,024 (Jun 26) | 10th | +4.8% | 6th | 27% above peers | |
| Fort Smith, AR | $114,649 (Jun 26) | 29th | +4.5% | 7th | 67% below peers | |
| Westminster, CA | $934,008 (Jun 26) | 4th | +3.7% | 8th | 170% above peers | |
| Nashua, NH | $387,942 (Jun 26) | 13th | +3.5% | 9th | 12% above peers | |
| Newton, MA | $990,781 (Jun 26) | 2nd | +3.5% | 10th | 186% above peers | |
| Danbury, CT | $340,302 (Jun 26) | 17th | +3.5% | 11th | 2% below peers | |
| Troy, MI | $342,306 (Jun 26) | 16th | +3.3% | 12th | 1% below peers | |
| Lawrence, MA | $379,426 (Jun 26) | 14th | +3.2% | 13th | 10% above peers | |
| South Gate, CA | $637,011 (Jun 26) | 7th | +3.0% | 14th | 84% above peers | |
| Santa Barbara, CA | $1,225,066 (Jun 26) | 1st | +2.9% | 15th | 254% above peers | |
| Bloomington, MN | $272,110 (Jun 26) | 21st | +2.2% | 16th | 21% below peers | |
| Bryan, TX | $189,999 (Jun 26) | 25th | +1.1% | 17th | 45% below peers | |
| Ogden, UT | $322,385 (Jun 26) | 19th | +1.0% | 18th | 7% below peers | |
| Santa Fe, NM | $409,850 (Jun 26) | 11th | +0.9% | 19th | 18% above peers | |
| Mission Viejo, CA | $879,254 (Jun 26) | 5th | +0.2% | 20th | 154% above peers | |
| Indio, CA | $394,123 (Jun 26) | 12th | +0.0% | 21st | 14% above peers | |
| Merced, CA | $324,862 (Jun 26) | 18th | -0.6% | 22nd | 6% below peers | |
| Hemet, CA | $345,970 (Jun 26) | 15th | -0.9% | 23rd | on par with peers | |
| Santa Monica, CA | $956,112 (Jun 26) | 3rd | -1.2% | 24th | 176% above peers | |
| Trenton, NJ | $208,402 (Jun 26) | 23rd | -2.5% | 25th | 40% below peers | |
| San Leandro, CA | $654,632 (Jun 26) | 6th | -2.9% | 26th | 89% above peers | |
| Temple, TX | $168,706 (Jun 26) | 26th | -3.5% | 27th | 51% below peers | |
| Germantown, MD | $311,886 (Jun 26) | 20th | -3.7% | 28th | 10% below peers | |
| Manteca, CA | $481,476 (Jun 26) | 9th | -4.0% | 29th | 39% above peers | |
| Deerfield Beach, FL | $124,254 (Jun 26) | 28th | -11.2% | 30th | 64% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Homeownership changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (50.6% then, 53.4% now; margin ±2.8pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas ref | 66.4% | +0.8pp | |||||
| United States ref | 65.2% | ||||||
| Manteca, CA | 72.4% | 3rd | +10.6pp | 1st | 30% above peers | ||
| Merced, CA | 45.9% | 24th | +4.6pp | 2nd | 17% below peers | ||
| Springdale, AR | 53.4% | 19th | +4.0pp | 3rd | 4% below peers | ||
| Waukegan, IL | 50.2% | 23rd | +3.7pp | 4th | 10% below peers | ||
| Deerfield Beach, FL | 63.9% | 9th | +4.4pp | 5th | 15% above peers | ||
| Hemet, CA | 62.3% | 11th | +3.8pp | 6th | 12% above peers | ||
| Germantown, MD | 67.2% | 5th | +4.1pp | 7th | 21% above peers | ||
| Ogden, UT | 61.3% | 12th | +3.5pp | 8th | 10% above peers | ||
| South Gate, CA | 45.3% | 25th | +2.5pp | 9th | 19% below peers | ||
| Fort Smith, AR | 53.4% | 20th | +2.7pp | 10th | 4% below peers | ||
| Trenton, NJ | 37.9% | 29th | +1.9pp | 11th | 32% below peers | ||
| Bryan, TX | 50.9% | 22nd | +2.5pp | 12th | 8% below peers | ||
| San Leandro, CA | 58.1% | 14th | +2.2pp | 13th | 4% above peers | ||
| Champaign, IL | 43.8% | 27th | +1.2pp | 14th | 21% below peers | ||
| Westminster, CA | 53.4% | 18th | +1.4pp | 15th | 4% below peers | ||
| Alafaya, FL | 64.4% | 8th | +1.7pp | 16th | 16% above peers | ||
| Clifton, NJ | 59.6% | 13th | +1.6pp | 17th | 7% above peers | ||
| Nashua, NH | 55.8% | 15th | +1.0pp | 18th | on par with peers | ||
| Santa Fe, NM | 63.6% | 10th | +0.9pp | 19th | 14% above peers | ||
| Mission Viejo, CA | 76.9% | 1st | -0.0pp | 20th | 38% above peers | ||
| Lawton, OK | 44.8% | 26th | -0.1pp | 21st | 19% below peers | ||
| Troy, MI | 73.2% | 2nd | -0.5pp | 22nd | 32% above peers | ||
| Santa Barbara, CA | 39.9% | 28th | -0.8pp | 23rd | 28% below peers | ||
| Bloomington, MN | 65.8% | 7th | -1.5pp | 24th | 18% above peers | ||
| Newton, MA | 70.0% | 4th | -2.0pp | 25th | 26% above peers | ||
| Santa Monica, CA | 27.9% | 31st | -1.1pp | 26th | 50% below peers | ||
| Norwalk, CT | 55.6% | 16th | -2.4pp | 27th | on par with peers | ||
| Temple, TX | 52.3% | 21st | -2.3pp | 28th | 6% below peers | ||
| Indio, CA | 67.1% | 6th | -3.5pp | 29th | 21% above peers | ||
| Danbury, CT | 53.8% | 17th | -4.3pp | 30th | 3% below peers | ||
| Lawrence, MA | 28.1% | 30th | -3.0pp | 31st | 50% below peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers. It is rising faster than most of the selected peers.
Rent rose about 5% over the 12 months ending June 2026, faster than 86% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States ref | $1,965 (Jun 26) | +2.2% | ||||
| South Gate, CA | $2,002 (Jun 26) | 17th | +9.0% | 1st | 6% below peers | |
| Mission Viejo, CA | $3,074 (Jun 26) | 4th | +7.7% | 2nd | 44% above peers | |
| Indio, CA | $2,616 (Jun 26) | 9th | +7.2% | 3rd | 22% above peers | |
| Champaign, IL | $1,410 (Jun 26) | 27th | +5.7% | 4th | 34% below peers | |
| Fort Smith, AR | $1,071 (Jun 26) | 30th | +5.2% | 5th | 50% below peers | |
| Lawton, OK | $1,086 (Jun 26) | 29th | +5.1% | 6th | 49% below peers | |
| San Leandro, CA | $2,468 (Jun 26) | 10th | +3.6% | 7th | 15% above peers | |
| Newton, MA | $3,685 (Jun 26) | 2nd | +3.5% | 8th | 72% above peers | |
| Lawrence, MA | $2,347 (Jun 26) | 13th | +3.1% | 9th | 10% above peers | |
| Santa Barbara, CA | $3,967 (Jun 26) | 1st | +3.1% | 10th | 85% above peers | |
| Clifton, NJ | $2,668 (Jun 26) | 6th | +2.7% | 11th | 25% above peers | |
| Nashua, NH | $2,216 (Jun 26) | 14th | +2.7% | 12th | 4% above peers | |
| Merced, CA | $1,964 (Jun 26) | 18th | +2.3% | 13th | 8% below peers | |
| Waukegan, IL | $1,648 (Jun 26) | 23rd | +2.3% | 14th | 23% below peers | |
| Bloomington, MN | $1,684 (Jun 26) | 22nd | +2.2% | 15th | 21% below peers | |
| Norwalk, CT | $2,718 (Jun 26) | 5th | +2.0% | 16th | 27% above peers | |
| Westminster, CA | $2,629 (Jun 26) | 7th | +1.7% | 17th | 23% above peers | |
| Trenton, NJ | $2,139 (Jun 26) | 15th | +1.5% | 18th | on par with peers | |
| Santa Monica, CA | $3,517 (Jun 26) | 3rd | +1.5% | 19th | 64% above peers | |
| Springdale, AR | $1,513 (Jun 26) | 24th | +1.4% | 20th | 29% below peers | |
| Troy, MI | $1,861 (Jun 26) | 21st | +1.3% | 21st | 13% below peers | |
| Danbury, CT | $2,439 (Jun 26) | 12th | +1.1% | 22nd | 14% above peers | |
| Santa Fe, NM | $1,932 (Jun 26) | 20th | +1.1% | 23rd | 10% below peers | |
| Deerfield Beach, FL | $2,440 (Jun 26) | 11th | +0.7% | 24th | 14% above peers | |
| Bryan, TX | $1,428 (Jun 26) | 26th | +0.5% | 25th | 33% below peers | |
| Manteca, CA | $2,624 (Jun 26) | 8th | +0.5% | 26th | 23% above peers | |
| Hemet, CA | $1,939 (Jun 26) | 19th | +0.2% | 27th | 9% below peers | |
| Ogden, UT | $1,310 (Jun 26) | 28th | +0.1% | 28th | 39% below peers | |
| Germantown, MD | $2,137 (Jun 26) | 16th | +0.0% | 29th | on par with peers | |
| Temple, TX | $1,428 (Jun 26) | 25th | -0.4% | 30th | 33% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Cost burden changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (29.1% then, 28.3% now; margin ±3.0pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas ref | 25.7% | +0.1pp | |||||
| United States ref | 32.2% | +0.4pp | |||||
| Waukegan, IL | 34.2% | 11th | -5.4pp | 1st | 13% below peers | ||
| Germantown, MD | 29.9% | 5th | -4.0pp | 2nd | 24% below peers | ||
| South Gate, CA | 45.1% | 25th | -5.8pp | 3rd | 14% above peers | ||
| Trenton, NJ | 45.8% | 27th | -4.2pp | 4th | 16% above peers | ||
| Indio, CA | 41.4% | 18th | -3.4pp | 5th | 5% above peers | ||
| Clifton, NJ | 42.5% | 22nd | -2.0pp | 6th | 8% above peers | ||
| Fort Smith, AR | 28.3% | 3rd | -0.8pp | 7th | 28% below peers | ||
| Merced, CA | 43.4% | 24th | -0.6pp | 8th | 10% above peers | ||
| Santa Barbara, CA | 45.3% | 26th | -0.6pp | 9th | 15% above peers | ||
| Hemet, CA | 46.6% | 28th | -0.5pp | 10th | 18% above peers | ||
| Norwalk, CT | 41.7% | 20th | -0.4pp | 11th | 6% above peers | ||
| Nashua, NH | 33.8% | 10th | -0.3pp | 12th | 14% below peers | ||
| Springdale, AR | 25.0% | 2nd | +0.2pp | 13th | 37% below peers | ||
| San Leandro, CA | 41.7% | 21st | +0.4pp | 14th | 6% above peers | ||
| Lawton, OK | 32.1% | 7th | +0.4pp | 15th | 19% below peers | ||
| Danbury, CT | 41.7% | 19th | +0.8pp | 16th | 6% above peers | ||
| Santa Monica, CA | 42.5% | 23rd | +1.0pp | 17th | 8% above peers | ||
| Lawrence, MA | 54.2% | 31st | +1.4pp | 18th | 37% above peers | ||
| Westminster, CA | 47.5% | 29th | +1.4pp | 19th | 20% above peers | ||
| Alafaya, FL | 32.6% | 8th | +1.0pp | 20th | 17% below peers | ||
| Champaign, IL | 38.0% | 15th | +1.2pp | 21st | 4% below peers | ||
| Newton, MA | 30.5% | 6th | +1.0pp | 22nd | 23% below peers | ||
| Bryan, TX | 39.5% | 16th | +1.3pp | 23rd | on par with peers | ||
| Manteca, CA | 40.8% | 17th | +1.7pp | 24th | 3% above peers | ||
| Santa Fe, NM | 35.7% | 13th | +1.7pp | 25th | 9% below peers | ||
| Bloomington, MN | 28.9% | 4th | +1.6pp | 26th | 27% below peers | ||
| Deerfield Beach, FL | 48.2% | 30th | +2.9pp | 27th | 22% above peers | ||
| Mission Viejo, CA | 37.5% | 14th | +2.8pp | 28th | 5% below peers | ||
| Troy, MI | 20.9% | 1st | +1.7pp | 29th | 47% below peers | ||
| Ogden, UT | 33.4% | 9th | +3.4pp | 30th | 16% below peers | ||
| Temple, TX | 34.3% | 12th | +3.9pp | 31st | 13% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
No vehicle changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (8.6% then, 7.6% now; margin ±1.7pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas ref | 5.8% | -0.5pp | |||||
| United States ref | 8.3% | -0.3pp | |||||
| Springdale, AR | 3.9% | 4th | -1.9pp | 1st | 50% below peers | ||
| Alafaya, FL | 1.6% | 1st | -0.5pp | 2nd | 80% below peers | ||
| Waukegan, IL | 8.4% | 19th | -1.9pp | 3rd | 7% above peers | ||
| Manteca, CA | 3.2% | 3rd | -0.7pp | 4th | 60% below peers | ||
| Merced, CA | 8.9% | 23rd | -1.8pp | 5th | 14% above peers | ||
| Lawrence, MA | 20.3% | 30th | -3.9pp | 6th | 158% above peers | ||
| Fort Smith, AR | 7.6% | 14th | -1.0pp | 7th | 3% below peers | ||
| Trenton, NJ | 26.7% | 31st | -3.4pp | 8th | 240% above peers | ||
| Temple, TX | 6.7% | 10th | -0.8pp | 9th | 15% below peers | ||
| Santa Fe, NM | 4.5% | 6th | -0.5pp | 10th | 43% below peers | ||
| Deerfield Beach, FL | 9.4% | 25th | -0.6pp | 11th | 20% above peers | ||
| Clifton, NJ | 10.0% | 27th | -0.5pp | 12th | 27% above peers | ||
| Santa Barbara, CA | 7.9% | 17th | -0.3pp | 13th | 1% above peers | ||
| South Gate, CA | 7.7% | 15th | -0.3pp | 14th | 2% below peers | ||
| Mission Viejo, CA | 2.8% | 2nd | -0.0pp | 15th | 64% below peers | ||
| Indio, CA | 4.0% | 5th | -0.0pp | 16th | 49% below peers | ||
| Nashua, NH | 7.9% | 16th | -0.0pp | 17th | on par with peers | ||
| Hemet, CA | 9.0% | 24th | -0.0pp | 18th | 15% above peers | ||
| Ogden, UT | 8.9% | 22nd | +0.0pp | 19th | 13% above peers | ||
| Bryan, TX | 6.5% | 9th | +0.2pp | 20th | 17% below peers | ||
| Lawton, OK | 9.9% | 26th | +0.4pp | 21st | 26% above peers | ||
| Newton, MA | 6.4% | 8th | +0.3pp | 22nd | 18% below peers | ||
| Danbury, CT | 8.4% | 18th | +0.5pp | 23rd | 6% above peers | ||
| Santa Monica, CA | 11.4% | 28th | +0.9pp | 24th | 46% above peers | ||
| Westminster, CA | 7.6% | 13th | +0.8pp | 25th | 4% below peers | ||
| Troy, MI | 4.6% | 7th | +0.6pp | 26th | 42% below peers | ||
| Bloomington, MN | 6.8% | 11th | +0.9pp | 27th | 14% below peers | ||
| Norwalk, CT | 8.5% | 20th | +1.7pp | 28th | 8% above peers | ||
| Champaign, IL | 16.7% | 29th | +3.6pp | 29th | 112% above peers | ||
| San Leandro, CA | 8.9% | 21st | +1.9pp | 30th | 13% above peers | ||
| Germantown, MD | 7.5% | 12th | +2.0pp | 31st | 5% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (12.1% then, 12.6% now; margin ±1.4pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas ref | 8.7% | +0.4pp | |||||
| United States ref | 8.2% | -0.4pp | |||||
| Norwalk, CT | 10.3% | 20th | -6.3pp | 1st | 27% above peers | ||
| Clifton, NJ | 6.8% | 12th | -3.7pp | 2nd | 16% below peers | ||
| Mission Viejo, CA | 3.2% | 3rd | -1.1pp | 3rd | 61% below peers | ||
| Santa Fe, NM | 9.9% | 19th | -3.1pp | 4th | 22% above peers | ||
| Santa Monica, CA | 3.5% | 4th | -1.0pp | 5th | 57% below peers | ||
| Hemet, CA | 7.0% | 13th | -1.8pp | 6th | 13% below peers | ||
| Alafaya, FL | 8.1% | 16th | -1.8pp | 7th | on par with peers | ||
| Santa Barbara, CA | 8.2% | 17th | -1.8pp | 8th | on par with peers | ||
| Lawrence, MA | 5.5% | 8th | -1.2pp | 9th | 32% below peers | ||
| South Gate, CA | 12.8% | 23rd | -2.3pp | 10th | 57% above peers | ||
| Lawton, OK | 10.9% | 21st | -1.3pp | 11th | 35% above peers | ||
| Deerfield Beach, FL | 16.7% | 29th | -1.8pp | 12th | 106% above peers | ||
| Danbury, CT | 14.6% | 26th | -1.4pp | 13th | 80% above peers | ||
| Bryan, TX | 16.4% | 28th | -1.4pp | 14th | 102% above peers | ||
| Westminster, CA | 6.2% | 10th | -0.5pp | 15th | 23% below peers | ||
| Manteca, CA | 4.2% | 5th | -0.3pp | 16th | 49% below peers | ||
| Germantown, MD | 6.3% | 11th | -0.3pp | 17th | 22% below peers | ||
| San Leandro, CA | 5.1% | 6th | -0.2pp | 18th | 37% below peers | ||
| Ogden, UT | 13.4% | 24th | -0.0pp | 19th | 65% above peers | ||
| Waukegan, IL | 15.7% | 27th | -0.0pp | 20th | 93% above peers | ||
| Merced, CA | 7.5% | 14th | +0.1pp | 21st | 7% below peers | ||
| Troy, MI | 2.8% | 2nd | +0.0pp | 22nd | 66% below peers | ||
| Trenton, NJ | 17.2% | 30th | +0.2pp | 23rd | 112% above peers | ||
| Newton, MA | 1.2% | 1st | +0.0pp | 24th | 85% below peers | ||
| Fort Smith, AR | 12.6% | 22nd | +0.5pp | 25th | 55% above peers | ||
| Bloomington, MN | 5.5% | 9th | +0.5pp | 26th | 32% below peers | ||
| Temple, TX | 13.6% | 25th | +1.8pp | 27th | 68% above peers | ||
| Indio, CA | 9.0% | 18th | +1.2pp | 28th | 11% above peers | ||
| Champaign, IL | 5.3% | 7th | +0.8pp | 29th | 35% below peers | ||
| Springdale, AR | 20.8% | 31st | +3.3pp | 30th | 156% above peers | ||
| Nashua, NH | 7.9% | 15th | +1.9pp | 31st | 2% below peers |
Modeled estimate with no usable trend; the level is shown and no trend claims are made.
Adult obesity is somewhat above the peer median.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas ref | 38.3% | |||
| United States ref | 33.4% | |||
| San Leandro, CA | 20.3% | 1st | 36% below peers | |
| Newton, MA | 20.4% | 2nd | 35% below peers | |
| Westminster, CA | 22.9% | 3rd | 28% below peers | |
| Santa Monica, CA | 23.0% | 4th | 27% below peers | |
| Santa Fe, NM | 24.0% | 5th | 24% below peers | |
| Troy, MI | 24.9% | 6th | 21% below peers | |
| Germantown, MD | 25.0% | 7th | 21% below peers | |
| Mission Viejo, CA | 25.0% | 8th | 21% below peers | |
| Norwalk, CT | 26.7% | 9th | 16% below peers | |
| Bloomington, MN | 27.2% | 10th | 14% below peers | |
| Danbury, CT | 27.6% | 11th | 13% below peers | |
| Clifton, NJ | 28.5% | 12th | 10% below peers | |
| Alafaya, FL | 30.3% | 13th | 4% below peers | |
| Nashua, NH | 31.0% | 14th | 2% below peers | |
| Santa Barbara, CA | 31.5% | 15th | on par with peers | |
| South Gate, CA | 31.6% | 16th | on par with peers | |
| Deerfield Beach, FL | 32.5% | 17th | 3% above peers | |
| Manteca, CA | 33.9% | 18th | 7% above peers | |
| Merced, CA | 34.4% | 19th | 9% above peers | |
| Champaign, IL | 35.1% | 20th | 11% above peers | |
| Indio, CA | 36.7% | 21st | 16% above peers | |
| Springdale, AR | 37.0% | 22nd | 17% above peers | |
| Fort Smith, AR | 37.4% | 23rd | 18% above peers | |
| Ogden, UT | 37.6% | 24th | 19% above peers | |
| Lawrence, MA | 38.1% | 25th | 21% above peers | |
| Hemet, CA | 38.3% | 26th | 21% above peers | |
| Waukegan, IL | 38.4% | 27th | 22% above peers | |
| Temple, TX | 38.7% | 28th | 22% above peers | |
| Bryan, TX | 39.6% | 29th | 25% above peers | |
| Trenton, NJ | 42.6% | 30th | 35% above peers | |
| Lawton, OK | 44.5% | 31st | 41% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin, in the wrong direction for this metric.
Child uninsured rose 4.0 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 5.9% to 9.9% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.7pp). That reverses the previous span, which went down between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys. 4 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas ref | 6.0% | +1.2pp | |||||
| United States ref | 5.5% | +0.4pp | |||||
| Norwalk, CT | 5.6% | 20th | -17.1pp | 1st | 29% above peers | ||
| Santa Fe, NM | 5.4% | 19th | -5.2pp | 2nd | 24% above peers | ||
| Santa Monica, CA | 2.2% | 5th | -2.0pp | 3rd | 49% below peers | ||
| Mission Viejo, CA | 2.1% | 4th | -1.7pp | 4th | 52% below peers | ||
| Lawrence, MA | 1.7% | 3rd | -1.4pp | 5th | 60% below peers | ||
| Hemet, CA | 4.4% | 16th | -2.3pp | 6th | on par with peers | ||
| South Gate, CA | 4.2% | 15th | -2.1pp | 7th | 5% below peers | ||
| Alafaya, FL | 4.1% | 14th | -1.9pp | 8th | 5% below peers | ||
| Clifton, NJ | 3.8% | 13th | -1.0pp | 9th | 14% below peers | ||
| Bloomington, MN | 5.4% | 18th | -1.2pp | 10th | 23% above peers | ||
| Santa Barbara, CA | 5.2% | 17th | -0.9pp | 11th | 18% above peers | ||
| Germantown, MD | 2.5% | 7th | -0.4pp | 12th | 42% below peers | ||
| Bryan, TX | 10.0% | 28th | -1.2pp | 13th | 129% above peers | ||
| Manteca, CA | 1.4% | 2nd | -0.1pp | 14th | 69% below peers | ||
| Waukegan, IL | 5.8% | 21st | -0.3pp | 15th | 32% above peers | ||
| Ogden, UT | 9.0% | 25th | -0.2pp | 16th | 105% above peers | ||
| Springdale, AR | 13.1% | 30th | -0.3pp | 17th | 200% above peers | ||
| Danbury, CT | 11.3% | 29th | +0.2pp | 18th | 158% above peers | ||
| Westminster, CA | 3.1% | 10th | +0.3pp | 19th | 29% below peers | ||
| Champaign, IL | 2.3% | 6th | +0.3pp | 20th | 48% below peers | ||
| Merced, CA | 3.4% | 11th | +0.5pp | 21st | 23% below peers | ||
| Deerfield Beach, FL | 13.6% | 31st | +2.4pp | 22nd | 210% above peers | ||
| Troy, MI | 2.8% | 8th | +0.5pp | 23rd | 37% below peers | ||
| Lawton, OK | 7.9% | 23rd | +1.9pp | 24th | 80% above peers | ||
| San Leandro, CA | 2.8% | 9th | +0.9pp | 25th | 36% below peers | ||
| Indio, CA | 3.5% | 12th | +1.4pp | 26th | 20% below peers | ||
| Fort Smith, AR | 9.9% | 27th | +4.0pp | 27th | 127% above peers | ||
| Temple, TX | 8.4% | 24th | +3.7pp | 28th | 92% above peers | ||
| Newton, MA | 0.9% | 1st | +0.4pp | 29th | 80% below peers | ||
| Trenton, NJ | 9.8% | 26th | +5.5pp | 30th | 124% above peers | ||
| Nashua, NH | 6.8% | 22nd | +5.1pp | 31st | 54% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
College attainment changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (21.8% then, 23.9% now; margin ±2.4pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas ref | 25.7% | +2.7pp | |||||
| United States ref | 35.7% | +3.5pp | |||||
| Lawrence, MA | 16.8% | 28th | +6.0pp | 1st | 45% below peers | ||
| Hemet, CA | 15.5% | 30th | +4.4pp | 2nd | 49% below peers | ||
| Trenton, NJ | 16.2% | 29th | +4.0pp | 3rd | 47% below peers | ||
| Manteca, CA | 21.7% | 24th | +5.0pp | 4th | 29% below peers | ||
| Ogden, UT | 25.9% | 19th | +5.1pp | 5th | 15% below peers | ||
| Merced, CA | 20.2% | 27th | +3.7pp | 6th | 34% below peers | ||
| Waukegan, IL | 20.9% | 25th | +3.5pp | 7th | 31% below peers | ||
| South Gate, CA | 11.3% | 31st | +1.8pp | 8th | 63% below peers | ||
| Indio, CA | 20.5% | 26th | +3.3pp | 9th | 33% below peers | ||
| Springdale, AR | 24.2% | 21st | +3.9pp | 10th | 21% below peers | ||
| Alafaya, FL | 50.0% | 8th | +6.8pp | 11th | 64% above peers | ||
| Santa Fe, NM | 47.8% | 9th | +6.1pp | 12th | 56% above peers | ||
| Nashua, NH | 41.2% | 12th | +5.1pp | 13th | 35% above peers | ||
| Bryan, TX | 30.1% | 17th | +3.5pp | 14th | 1% below peers | ||
| Bloomington, MN | 46.2% | 10th | +4.2pp | 15th | 51% above peers | ||
| Fort Smith, AR | 23.9% | 22nd | +2.0pp | 16th | 22% below peers | ||
| Clifton, NJ | 35.5% | 13th | +2.9pp | 17th | 16% above peers | ||
| Deerfield Beach, FL | 28.8% | 18th | +2.1pp | 18th | 6% below peers | ||
| Danbury, CT | 34.0% | 14th | +2.2pp | 19th | 11% above peers | ||
| Troy, MI | 64.8% | 3rd | +4.0pp | 20th | 112% above peers | ||
| Champaign, IL | 52.7% | 4th | +3.2pp | 21st | 73% above peers | ||
| Mission Viejo, CA | 52.1% | 5th | +3.0pp | 22nd | 70% above peers | ||
| Lawton, OK | 22.5% | 23rd | +1.3pp | 23rd | 26% below peers | ||
| Temple, TX | 30.6% | 16th | +1.7pp | 24th | on par with peers | ||
| Santa Barbara, CA | 51.9% | 6th | +2.7pp | 25th | 70% above peers | ||
| San Leandro, CA | 33.3% | 15th | +1.6pp | 26th | 9% above peers | ||
| Santa Monica, CA | 70.7% | 2nd | +2.8pp | 27th | 131% above peers | ||
| Norwalk, CT | 44.8% | 11th | +1.4pp | 28th | 46% above peers | ||
| Newton, MA | 81.1% | 1st | +2.0pp | 29th | 166% above peers | ||
| Germantown, MD | 50.4% | 7th | +0.3pp | 30th | 65% above peers | ||
| Westminster, CA | 25.9% | 20th | -1.2pp | 31st | 15% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Preschool enrollment changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (45.4% then, 43.6% now; margin ±11.7pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas ref | 41.1% | -8.6pp | |||||
| United States ref | 45.5% | ||||||
| Bloomington, MN | 59.5% | 6th | +23.0pp | 1st | 40% above peers | ||
| Danbury, CT | 65.1% | 4th | +17.0pp | 2nd | 53% above peers | ||
| Bryan, TX | 36.9% | 22nd | +6.9pp | 3rd | 13% below peers | ||
| Temple, TX | 40.2% | 18th | +5.7pp | 4th | 6% below peers | ||
| Champaign, IL | 53.9% | 10th | +4.6pp | 5th | 26% above peers | ||
| Trenton, NJ | 61.4% | 5th | +4.5pp | 6th | 44% above peers | ||
| Norwalk, CT | 75.6% | 1st | +5.3pp | 7th | 77% above peers | ||
| Waukegan, IL | 42.7% | 16th | +1.7pp | 8th | on par with peers | ||
| Lawrence, MA | 42.4% | 17th | +0.9pp | 9th | 1% below peers | ||
| Santa Fe, NM | 58.1% | 7th | +1.0pp | 10th | 36% above peers | ||
| Germantown, MD | 50.8% | 11th | -0.2pp | 11th | 19% above peers | ||
| Fort Smith, AR | 43.5% | 15th | -1.9pp | 12th | 2% above peers | ||
| Santa Monica, CA | 71.9% | 2nd | -5.0pp | 13th | 69% above peers | ||
| Ogden, UT | 29.4% | 28th | -5.2pp | 14th | 31% below peers | ||
| San Leandro, CA | 50.6% | 13th | -10.0pp | 15th | 19% above peers | ||
| South Gate, CA | 37.4% | 21st | -7.4pp | 16th | 12% below peers | ||
| Newton, MA | 67.2% | 3rd | -13.5pp | 17th | 57% above peers | ||
| Clifton, NJ | 56.3% | 8th | -13.3pp | 18th | 32% above peers | ||
| Troy, MI | 50.7% | 12th | -13.1pp | 19th | 19% above peers | ||
| Santa Barbara, CA | 55.4% | 9th | -14.6pp | 20th | 30% above peers | ||
| Manteca, CA | 31.2% | 27th | -12.5pp | 21st | 27% below peers | ||
| Lawton, OK | 31.8% | 26th | -13.1pp | 22nd | 25% below peers | ||
| Westminster, CA | 38.8% | 20th | -19.0pp | 23rd | 9% below peers | ||
| Hemet, CA | 22.6% | 30th | -11.4pp | 24th | 47% below peers | ||
| Springdale, AR | 28.9% | 29th | -15.0pp | 25th | 32% below peers | ||
| Nashua, NH | 39.2% | 19th | -20.5pp | 26th | 8% below peers | ||
| Merced, CA | 36.2% | 23rd | -19.4pp | 27th | 15% below peers | ||
| Mission Viejo, CA | 44.0% | 14th | -25.8pp | 28th | 3% above peers | ||
| Indio, CA | 21.5% | 31st | -16.3pp | 29th | 50% below peers | ||
| Deerfield Beach, FL | 36.1% | 24th | -29.0pp | 30th | 15% below peers | ||
| Alafaya, FL | 31.9% | 25th | -31.7pp | 31st | 25% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Disconnected youth changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (11.6% then, 13.7% now; margin ±6.0pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas ref | 9.6% | +0.9pp | |||||
| United States ref | 6.9% | +0.3pp | |||||
| Norwalk, CT | 2.0% | 4th | -5.1pp | 1st | 74% below peers | ||
| Alafaya, FL | 1.5% | 3rd | -2.2pp | 2nd | 81% below peers | ||
| Mission Viejo, CA | 1.1% | 2nd | -1.5pp | 3rd | 86% below peers | ||
| Clifton, NJ | 2.9% | 7th | -3.1pp | 4th | 63% below peers | ||
| Newton, MA | 0.7% | 1st | -0.7pp | 5th | 91% below peers | ||
| Hemet, CA | 7.9% | 16th | -5.8pp | 6th | on par with peers | ||
| Bloomington, MN | 2.7% | 6th | -1.9pp | 7th | 66% below peers | ||
| Lawrence, MA | 11.4% | 25th | -4.0pp | 8th | 45% above peers | ||
| Nashua, NH | 5.4% | 11th | -0.4pp | 9th | 32% below peers | ||
| Springdale, AR | 7.3% | 15th | +0.4pp | 10th | 8% below peers | ||
| Manteca, CA | 8.0% | 17th | +0.4pp | 11th | 2% above peers | ||
| Troy, MI | 2.6% | 5th | +0.1pp | 12th | 67% below peers | ||
| Merced, CA | 11.9% | 26th | +0.8pp | 13th | 51% above peers | ||
| Indio, CA | 9.1% | 19th | +0.6pp | 14th | 15% above peers | ||
| South Gate, CA | 9.4% | 21st | +1.0pp | 15th | 19% above peers | ||
| Fort Smith, AR | 13.7% | 30th | +2.1pp | 16th | 74% above peers | ||
| Trenton, NJ | 13.6% | 29th | +3.0pp | 17th | 73% above peers | ||
| Ogden, UT | 8.1% | 18th | +2.0pp | 18th | 3% above peers | ||
| Santa Monica, CA | 4.8% | 9th | +1.4pp | 19th | 39% below peers | ||
| Santa Fe, NM | 9.2% | 20th | +2.9pp | 20th | 16% above peers | ||
| Temple, TX | 6.5% | 14th | +2.6pp | 21st | 18% below peers | ||
| Danbury, CT | 5.1% | 10th | +2.1pp | 22nd | 35% below peers | ||
| Waukegan, IL | 11.0% | 24th | +4.9pp | 23rd | 40% above peers | ||
| Germantown, MD | 4.4% | 8th | +2.0pp | 24th | 45% below peers | ||
| Deerfield Beach, FL | 12.1% | 27th | +5.7pp | 25th | 54% above peers | ||
| Santa Barbara, CA | 10.3% | 22nd | +5.0pp | 26th | 31% above peers | ||
| San Leandro, CA | 10.9% | 23rd | +5.9pp | 27th | 39% above peers | ||
| Westminster, CA | 5.7% | 12th | +3.3pp | 28th | 27% below peers | ||
| Champaign, IL | 6.4% | 13th | +3.7pp | 29th | 19% below peers | ||
| Lawton, OK | 12.7% | 28th | +7.5pp | 30th | 62% above peers | ||
| Bryan, TX | 15.6% | 31st | +10.5pp | 31st | 98% above peers |
A real change beyond the survey margin; neither direction is inherently better for this metric.
Population rose about 2% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 87,743 to 89,805 - more than the combined survey margin (±83). 21 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temple, TX | 89,602 | 16th | +20% | 1st | on par with peers | ||
| Manteca, CA | 89,043 | 20th | +13% | 2nd | 1% below peers | ||
| Merced, CA | 91,953 | 4th | +11% | 3rd | 3% above peers | ||
| Lawrence, MA | 88,736 | 22nd | +11% | 4th | 1% below peers | ||
| Springdale, AR | 88,160 | 24th | +11% | 5th | 2% below peers | ||
| Deerfield Beach, FL | 88,093 | 25th | +10% | 6th | 2% below peers | ||
| Trenton, NJ | 90,338 | 12th | +8% | 7th | 1% above peers | ||
| Hemet, CA | 91,326 | 7th | +8% | 8th | 2% above peers | ||
| Santa Fe, NM | 89,019 | 21st | +6% | 9th | 1% below peers | ||
| Clifton, NJ | 89,379 | 17th | +5% | 10th | on par with peers | ||
| Troy, MI | 87,898 | 27th | +5% | 11th | 2% below peers | ||
| Bryan, TX | 87,939 | 26th | +5% | 12th | 2% below peers | ||
| Norwalk, CT | 92,187 | 2nd | +4% | 13th | 3% above peers | ||
| Bloomington, MN | 88,665 | 23rd | +4% | 14th | 1% below peers | ||
| Danbury, CT | 87,263 | 31st | +3% | 15th | 3% below peers | ||
| Nashua, NH | 91,294 | 8th | +3% | 16th | 2% above peers | ||
| Indio, CA | 91,950 | 5th | +3% | 17th | 3% above peers | ||
| Champaign, IL | 89,996 | 13th | +3% | 18th | on par with peers | ||
| Fort Smith, AR | 89,805 | 15th | +2% | 19th | on par with peers | ||
| Waukegan, IL | 89,076 | 18th | +2% | 20th | 1% below peers | ||
| Alafaya, FL | 92,449 | 1st | +2% | 21st | 3% above peers | ||
| Ogden, UT | 87,413 | 30th | +1% | 22nd | 2% below peers | ||
| Newton, MA | 89,044 | 19th | +1% | 23rd | 1% below peers | ||
| Germantown, MD | 90,719 | 10th | +0% | 24th | 1% above peers | ||
| Santa Monica, CA | 91,169 | 9th | -0% | 25th | 2% above peers | ||
| Westminster, CA | 89,860 | 14th | -1% | 26th | on par with peers | ||
| San Leandro, CA | 87,826 | 28th | -2% | 27th | 2% below peers | ||
| South Gate, CA | 91,483 | 6th | -3% | 28th | 2% above peers | ||
| Mission Viejo, CA | 92,151 | 3rd | -4% | 29th | 3% above peers | ||
| Lawton, OK | 90,595 | 11th | -4% | 30th | 1% above peers | ||
| Santa Barbara, CA | 87,779 | 29th | -4% | 31st | 2% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Single-parent changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (37.3% then, 32.6% now; margin ±5.8pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas ref | 32.2% | -1.1pp | |||||
| United States ref | 29.9% | -0.2pp | |||||
| Santa Barbara, CA | 38.3% | 10th | +6.8pp | 1st | 18% above peers | ||
| Santa Monica, CA | 25.9% | 23rd | +4.4pp | 2nd | 20% below peers | ||
| Hemet, CA | 39.1% | 8th | +6.6pp | 3rd | 20% above peers | ||
| Manteca, CA | 30.9% | 17th | +4.9pp | 4th | 5% below peers | ||
| Lawton, OK | 47.3% | 4th | +6.7pp | 5th | 45% above peers | ||
| Waukegan, IL | 46.3% | 5th | +5.1pp | 6th | 42% above peers | ||
| Merced, CA | 48.8% | 3rd | +3.9pp | 7th | 50% above peers | ||
| Trenton, NJ | 64.2% | 1st | +3.8pp | 8th | 97% above peers | ||
| Lawrence, MA | 62.2% | 2nd | +3.5pp | 9th | 91% above peers | ||
| Troy, MI | 11.4% | 29th | +0.6pp | 10th | 65% below peers | ||
| Champaign, IL | 37.2% | 12th | +1.7pp | 11th | 14% above peers | ||
| Nashua, NH | 30.4% | 19th | +0.8pp | 12th | 7% below peers | ||
| Norwalk, CT | 28.7% | 21st | +0.5pp | 13th | 12% below peers | ||
| South Gate, CA | 40.3% | 6th | +0.7pp | 14th | 24% above peers | ||
| Springdale, AR | 32.8% | 15th | +0.5pp | 15th | 1% above peers | ||
| Temple, TX | 34.6% | 13th | +0.5pp | 16th | 6% above peers | ||
| Danbury, CT | 33.7% | 14th | +0.1pp | 17th | 3% above peers | ||
| Westminster, CA | 23.2% | 26th | -0.1pp | 18th | 29% below peers | ||
| Bloomington, MN | 24.9% | 24th | -0.2pp | 19th | 24% below peers | ||
| Germantown, MD | 30.4% | 18th | -1.5pp | 20th | 7% below peers | ||
| Santa Fe, NM | 38.8% | 9th | -2.8pp | 21st | 19% above peers | ||
| Deerfield Beach, FL | 37.2% | 11th | -4.0pp | 22nd | 14% above peers | ||
| Fort Smith, AR | 32.6% | 16th | -4.7pp | 23rd | on par with peers | ||
| San Leandro, CA | 23.6% | 25th | -3.9pp | 24th | 27% below peers | ||
| Bryan, TX | 39.3% | 7th | -7.2pp | 25th | 21% above peers | ||
| Indio, CA | 28.1% | 22nd | -5.4pp | 26th | 14% below peers | ||
| Ogden, UT | 29.4% | 20th | -6.8pp | 27th | 10% below peers | ||
| Newton, MA | 10.4% | 31st | -3.4pp | 28th | 68% below peers | ||
| Clifton, NJ | 20.3% | 27th | -7.6pp | 29th | 38% below peers | ||
| Alafaya, FL | 18.6% | 28th | -7.1pp | 30th | 43% below peers | ||
| Mission Viejo, CA | 10.4% | 30th | -5.5pp | 31st | 68% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Working parents changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (66.2% then, 66.9% now; margin ±13.3pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas ref | 65.7% | +0.9pp | |||||
| United States ref | 68.1% | +1.9pp | |||||
| Santa Monica, CA | 86.6% | 1st | +21.8pp | 1st | 25% above peers | ||
| Santa Fe, NM | 83.6% | 2nd | +16.3pp | 2nd | 21% above peers | ||
| Clifton, NJ | 74.6% | 10th | +14.0pp | 3rd | 8% above peers | ||
| Merced, CA | 64.6% | 21st | +10.6pp | 4th | 7% below peers | ||
| Norwalk, CT | 76.9% | 6th | +9.7pp | 5th | 11% above peers | ||
| Manteca, CA | 59.7% | 29th | +5.8pp | 6th | 14% below peers | ||
| Lawton, OK | 61.0% | 28th | +5.0pp | 7th | 12% below peers | ||
| Nashua, NH | 78.2% | 5th | +6.0pp | 8th | 13% above peers | ||
| Mission Viejo, CA | 70.3% | 15th | +5.1pp | 9th | 1% above peers | ||
| Lawrence, MA | 80.3% | 3rd | +5.3pp | 10th | 16% above peers | ||
| Trenton, NJ | 69.3% | 16th | +4.4pp | 11th | on par with peers | ||
| Troy, MI | 58.3% | 31st | +3.6pp | 12th | 16% below peers | ||
| Hemet, CA | 64.3% | 24th | +3.6pp | 13th | 7% below peers | ||
| Waukegan, IL | 74.9% | 9th | +3.5pp | 14th | 8% above peers | ||
| Ogden, UT | 66.0% | 20th | +2.9pp | 15th | 5% below peers | ||
| Temple, TX | 61.5% | 27th | +2.4pp | 16th | 11% below peers | ||
| Bryan, TX | 66.0% | 19th | +2.5pp | 17th | 5% below peers | ||
| Germantown, MD | 75.7% | 8th | +2.7pp | 18th | 9% above peers | ||
| South Gate, CA | 73.5% | 12th | +1.8pp | 19th | 6% above peers | ||
| Springdale, AR | 64.4% | 23rd | +1.3pp | 20th | 7% below peers | ||
| Santa Barbara, CA | 71.5% | 13th | +1.2pp | 21st | 3% above peers | ||
| Fort Smith, AR | 66.9% | 18th | +0.7pp | 22nd | 4% below peers | ||
| Newton, MA | 78.2% | 4th | -0.0pp | 23rd | 13% above peers | ||
| Champaign, IL | 71.5% | 14th | -1.6pp | 24th | 3% above peers | ||
| Westminster, CA | 62.7% | 25th | -1.8pp | 25th | 10% below peers | ||
| Deerfield Beach, FL | 69.0% | 17th | -3.4pp | 26th | 1% below peers | ||
| Danbury, CT | 73.8% | 11th | -4.4pp | 27th | 6% above peers | ||
| Bloomington, MN | 76.0% | 7th | -5.0pp | 28th | 10% above peers | ||
| Indio, CA | 64.5% | 22nd | -5.4pp | 29th | 7% below peers | ||
| Alafaya, FL | 61.9% | 26th | -9.1pp | 30th | 11% below peers | ||
| San Leandro, CA | 58.5% | 30th | -14.5pp | 31st | 16% below peers |