DataWorks Commons
Carson, CA
← All cities

Carson, CA

See all data for this place →
92,871 people (2024) 50k-100k West

Bright spots 7 indicators

Where Carson, CA shows a real improvement in recent years, or stands clearly ahead of its peers. How this is calculated →
Child poverty
Share of children below the poverty level
8.3%
2020-24
▼ 36%
relative change
13.0% in 2019
Real improvement Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Household income
Median household income
$108,703
2020-24
▲ 32%
relative change
$82,305 in 2019
Real improvement Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Broadband
Households with a broadband internet subscription
95.1%
2020-24
▲ 8%
relative change
88.3% in 2019
Real improvement Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Homeownership
Homeownership rate
74.0%
2020-24
▲ 1%
relative change
73.1% in 2019
No measurable change Leading peers
Learn more ↓
No vehicle
Households without a vehicle
4.6%
2020-24
▲ 28%
relative change
3.6% in 2019
No measurable change Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Poverty
Share of people below the poverty level
8.6%
2020-24
▼ <1%
relative change
8.7% in 2019
No measurable change Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Cost burden
Housing cost-burdened households
34.5%
2020-24
▼ 1%
relative change
34.9% in 2019
No measurable change Trailing peers
Learn more ↓

What needs attention 6 indicators

Where Carson, CA shows a real worsening in recent years, or trails its peers clearly. How this is calculated →
SNAP
Households receiving SNAP
12.7%
2019-23
▲ 68%
relative change
7.6% in 2018
Worsening Trailing peers
Learn more ↓
Inequality
Income inequality (Gini index)
0.43
2020-24
▲ 8%
relative change
0.40 in 2019
Worsening Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Unemployment
Unemployment rate
5.5%
May 2026
▲ 4%
relative change
5.3% a year earlier
Behind peers and rising Trailing peers
Learn more ↓
Disconnected youth
Teens not in school and not working
10.0%
2020-24
▲ 26%
relative change
7.9% in 2019
No measurable change Trailing peers
Learn more ↓
Child uninsured
Children without health insurance
3.6%
2020-24
▲ 21%
relative change
3.0% in 2019
Turning up (early signal) Leading peers
Learn more ↓
College attainment
Adults with a bachelor's degree or higher
29.3%
2020-24
▲ 4%
relative change
28.3% in 2019
No measurable change Trailing peers
Learn more ↓

Big shifts 4 indicators

Real moves and big gaps, where neither direction is simply good or bad. Biggest relative change first; big-gap cards come last. How this is calculated →
Home value
Typical home value
$798,573
Jun 2026
▲ 1%
relative change
$790,060 a year earlier
Rising recently Among the highest of peers
Learn more ↓
Population
92,871
2020-24
▲ <1%
relative change
92,079 in 2019
Rising Among the lowest of peers
Learn more ↓
Starter homes
Starter home value (bottom tier)
$668,515
Jun 2026
flat
relative change
$666,161 a year earlier
Rising Among the highest of peers
Learn more ↓
Rent
Typical asking rent
$2,953
Jun 2026
flat
relative change
$2,956 a year earlier
Rising Among the highest of peers
Learn more ↓

All indicators

Economy
Economy

Median household income

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Household income rose about 32% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from $82,305 to $108,703 (each survey's own dollars, not adjusted for inflation) - more than the combined survey margin (±$5,765). 30 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the stronger third of similar-size cities and kept improving; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 30 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: household income rose about 52% from 2014 to 2024 ($71,420 to $108,703).
$108,703
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref $99,122 +32%
United States ref $80,734 +28%
Arden-Arcade, CA $77,321 20th +53% 1st 21% below peers
Compton, CA $78,465 19th +48% 2nd 20% below peers
Hemet, CA $57,719 28th +45% 3rd 41% below peers
Indio, CA $77,167 21st +44% 4th 22% below peers
South Gate, CA $74,571 22nd +43% 5th 24% below peers
Asheville, NC $71,102 23rd +42% 6th 28% below peers
Merced, CA $63,122 27th +40% 7th 36% below peers
Avondale, AZ $86,123 18th +39% 8th 13% below peers
San Marcos, CA $109,377 9th +39% 9th 11% above peers
Fort Myers, FL $63,732 26th +37% 10th 35% below peers
Alafaya, FL $100,950 14th +34% 11th 3% above peers
Carson, CA $108,703 11th +32% 12th 10% above peers
Fall River, MA $56,673 29th +30% 13th 42% below peers
Redding, CA $70,466 24th +30% 14th 28% below peers
Roswell, GA $128,654 3rd +29% 15th 31% above peers
Nashua, NH $96,326 17th +28% 16th 2% below peers
Kirkland, WA $150,414 1st +28% 17th 53% above peers
Chino, CA $104,682 13th +28% 18th 6% above peers
Norwalk, CT $107,616 12th +25% 19th 9% above peers
Toms River, NJ $100,137 15th +25% 20th 2% above peers
Bellingham, WA $66,755 25th +25% 21st 32% below peers
Germantown, MD $117,546 5th +24% 22nd 19% above peers
Livonia, MI $98,460 16th +23% 23rd on par with peers
O'Fallon, MO $110,443 8th +23% 24th 12% above peers
Hoover, AL $109,253 10th +22% 25th 11% above peers
Greenville, NC $49,748 30th +22% 26th 49% below peers
Erie, PA $46,113 31st +22% 27th 53% below peers
Mount Pleasant, SC $124,755 4th +21% 28th 27% above peers
Sandy, UT $112,176 7th +19% 29th 14% above peers
Santa Monica, CA $114,885 6th +19% 30th 17% above peers
Mission Viejo, CA $136,123 2nd +15% 31st 38% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 23 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyMedian household income
Loading tract map…
7 of 23 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Palo Alto, CA up about 46% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 95% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Dublin, CA up about 43% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 92% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Bentonville, AR up about 40% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 88% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±$4,237 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Unemployment rate

▼ Lower is better Worsening, slower than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Unemployment rose about 0.1 percentage points a year from 2022 to 2025. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening slower than 85% of similar-size cities over 2022-2025.
Longer view: unemployment fell less than 0.1 percentage points a year from 2015 to 2025.
Most recent monthly reading: 5.5% in May 2026, up from 5.3% a year earlier.
5.5%
1990May 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 27 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 5.3% (May 26) -0.2pp
United States ref 4.2% (Jun 26) +0.1pp
Asheville, NC 3.4% (May 26) 7th -1.6pp 1st 21% below peers
Merced, CA 6.8% (May 26) 27th -0.9pp 2nd 58% above peers
Indio, CA 4.5% (May 26) 16th -0.5pp 3rd 5% above peers
O'Fallon, MO 2.8% (May 26) 2nd -0.4pp 4th 35% below peers
South Gate, CA 4.6% (May 26) 18th -0.4pp 5th 7% above peers
Hemet, CA 6.3% (May 26) 26th -0.4pp 6th 47% above peers
Redding, CA 4.2% (May 26) 13th -0.3pp 7th 2% below peers
Fall River, MA 5.4% (May 26) 22nd -0.3pp 8th 26% above peers
Nashua, NH 3.2% (May 26) 5th -0.3pp 9th 26% below peers
Mission Viejo, CA 3.6% (May 26) 9th -0.2pp 10th 16% below peers
Compton, CA 5.9% (May 26) 25th -0.2pp 11th 37% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 5.4% (May 26) 23rd -0.2pp 12th 26% above peers
Sandy, UT 3.4% (May 26) 8th -0.1pp 13th 21% below peers
San Marcos, CA 3.6% (May 26) 10th -0.1pp 14th 16% below peers
Chino, CA 4.0% (May 26) 11th -0.1pp 15th 7% below peers
Greenville, NC 4.3% (May 26) 14th +0.0pp 16th on par with peers
Mount Pleasant, SC 2.8% (May 26) 3rd +0.0pp 17th 35% below peers
Roswell, GA 2.9% (May 26) 4th +0.1pp 18th 33% below peers
Carson, CA 5.5% (May 26) 24th +0.2pp 19th 28% above peers
Avondale, AZ 4.3% (May 26) 15th +0.3pp 20th on par with peers
Livonia, MI 3.3% (May 26) 6th +0.3pp 21st 23% below peers
Bellingham, WA 4.1% (May 26) 12th +0.4pp 22nd 5% below peers
Erie, PA 4.6% (May 26) 19th +0.6pp 23rd 7% above peers
Hoover, AL 2.6% (May 26) 1st +0.7pp 24th 40% below peers
Kirkland, WA 4.6% (May 26) 20th +0.8pp 25th 7% above peers
Norwalk, CT 4.5% (May 26) 17th +1.0pp 26th 5% above peers
Fort Myers, FL 5.0% (May 26) 21st +1.2pp 27th 16% above peers
BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics through 2025 administrative trend: robust fit about this metric
Economy

Share of people below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Poverty changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (8.7% then, 8.6% now; margin ±1.8pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 11 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: poverty fell 2.9 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (11.4% to 8.6%).
8.6%
20112024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 11.8% -1.3pp
United States ref 12.0%
Indio, CA 11.4% 19th -5.0pp 1st 23% above peers
Hemet, CA 14.8% 23rd -6.2pp 2nd 59% above peers
South Gate, CA 12.7% 20th -4.4pp 3rd 37% above peers
Arden-Arcade, CA 16.8% 25th -5.0pp 4th 81% above peers
Toms River, NJ 5.8% 6th -1.7pp 5th 38% below peers
San Marcos, CA 9.0% 14th -2.2pp 6th 3% below peers
Redding, CA 13.8% 22nd -3.3pp 7th 48% above peers
Merced, CA 23.6% 31st -5.3pp 8th 155% above peers
Avondale, AZ 10.8% 17th -2.4pp 9th 16% above peers
Greenville, NC 23.2% 30th -5.0pp 10th 150% above peers
Hoover, AL 5.0% 2nd -1.1pp 11th 46% below peers
Nashua, NH 7.7% 11th -1.4pp 12th 17% below peers
Livonia, MI 4.7% 1st -0.8pp 13th 50% below peers
Compton, CA 17.8% 27th -2.6pp 14th 92% above peers
Erie, PA 21.9% 29th -3.0pp 15th 135% above peers
Alafaya, FL 9.3% 16th -1.2pp 16th on par with peers
Chino, CA 7.7% 10th -1.0pp 17th 17% below peers
Bellingham, WA 17.8% 26th -2.0pp 18th 91% above peers
Norwalk, CT 9.1% 15th -1.0pp 19th 2% below peers
Fort Myers, FL 15.8% 24th -0.4pp 20th 70% above peers
Roswell, GA 7.5% 9th -0.1pp 21st 20% below peers
Carson, CA 8.6% 12th -0.1pp 22nd 7% below peers
Kirkland, WA 6.0% 7th -0.0pp 23rd 35% below peers
Fall River, MA 19.3% 28th -0.1pp 24th 108% above peers
Asheville, NC 13.8% 21st +0.4pp 25th 48% above peers
Mission Viejo, CA 5.6% 5th +0.3pp 26th 40% below peers
Sandy, UT 5.4% 4th +0.3pp 27th 41% below peers
Santa Monica, CA 11.1% 18th +1.2pp 28th 19% above peers
O'Fallon, MO 5.3% 3rd +0.9pp 29th 42% below peers
Germantown, MD 8.8% 13th +2.2pp 30th 5% below peers
Mount Pleasant, SC 6.1% 8th +1.5pp 31st 35% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 23 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of people below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
7 of 23 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Brentwood, NY down 5.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2017-2022
  • Coeur d'Alene, ID down 5.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Westchester, FL down 5.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.2pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Share of children below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Child poverty fell 4.7 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 13.0% to 8.3% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.8pp). 15 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started mid-pack and has reached a genuinely better level; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 17 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: child poverty fell 8.1 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (16.4% to 8.3%).
8.3%
20132024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 15.0% -3.1pp
United States ref 16.1%
Toms River, NJ 3.6% 2nd -4.6pp 1st 72% below peers
Livonia, MI 3.2% 1st -3.4pp 2nd 75% below peers
South Gate, CA 14.6% 18th -9.6pp 3rd 15% above peers
Chino, CA 8.8% 14th -5.3pp 4th 31% below peers
Hemet, CA 17.7% 23rd -10.7pp 5th 39% above peers
Carson, CA 8.3% 12th -4.7pp 6th 35% below peers
San Marcos, CA 7.6% 10th -4.1pp 7th 40% below peers
Hoover, AL 5.2% 3rd -2.8pp 8th 59% below peers
Greenville, NC 21.8% 25th -10.8pp 9th 71% above peers
Roswell, GA 7.4% 9th -3.7pp 10th 42% below peers
Redding, CA 15.4% 20th -7.5pp 11th 21% above peers
Indio, CA 17.6% 22nd -6.4pp 12th 38% above peers
Arden-Arcade, CA 25.5% 26th -7.1pp 13th 101% above peers
Nashua, NH 9.7% 15th -2.3pp 14th 24% below peers
Avondale, AZ 15.1% 19th -3.4pp 15th 19% above peers
Alafaya, FL 8.5% 13th -1.8pp 16th 33% below peers
Asheville, NC 16.2% 21st -3.1pp 17th 28% above peers
Fall River, MA 26.6% 29th -4.8pp 18th 109% above peers
Merced, CA 33.4% 30th -5.5pp 19th 163% above peers
Sandy, UT 5.7% 7th -0.6pp 20th 55% below peers
Compton, CA 25.9% 28th -2.6pp 21st 104% above peers
Fort Myers, FL 25.7% 27th -2.3pp 22nd 102% above peers
Erie, PA 34.8% 31st -3.1pp 23rd 174% above peers
Norwalk, CT 12.7% 16th -1.1pp 24th on par with peers
Mission Viejo, CA 5.5% 6th -0.3pp 25th 56% below peers
Kirkland, WA 5.3% 4th +0.2pp 26th 58% below peers
O'Fallon, MO 6.2% 8th +0.5pp 27th 51% below peers
Santa Monica, CA 7.7% 11th +2.4pp 28th 39% below peers
Mount Pleasant, SC 5.4% 5th +1.9pp 29th 58% below peers
Bellingham, WA 18.8% 24th +6.9pp 30th 48% above peers
Germantown, MD 14.2% 17th +5.2pp 31st 12% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 23 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of children below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
7 of 23 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Somerville, MA down 13.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Southfield, MI down 8.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Brentwood, NY down 9.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2017-2022
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.9pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Households with a broadband internet subscription

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Broadband rose 6.8 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 88.3% to 95.1% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.7pp). 27 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started mid-pack and has reached a genuinely better level; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 28 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: broadband rose 12.1 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (83.0% to 95.1%).
95.1%
20172024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 93.6% +6.6pp
United States ref 91.1%
Fall River, MA 86.5% 29th +16.1pp 1st 8% below peers
Compton, CA 86.3% 30th +14.0pp 2nd 8% below peers
Hemet, CA 88.9% 27th +11.8pp 3rd 5% below peers
Erie, PA 88.3% 28th +10.7pp 4th 6% below peers
Redding, CA 94.0% 14th +11.0pp 5th on par with peers
Indio, CA 93.2% 19th +10.4pp 6th 1% below peers
Fort Myers, FL 90.0% 25th +9.1pp 7th 4% below peers
Greenville, NC 89.7% 26th +8.9pp 8th 4% below peers
South Gate, CA 90.9% 23rd +7.0pp 9th 3% below peers
Asheville, NC 90.6% 24th +6.6pp 10th 3% below peers
Carson, CA 95.1% 9th +6.8pp 11th 1% above peers
Merced, CA 94.3% 12th +6.6pp 12th on par with peers
Arden-Arcade, CA 93.8% 16th +6.2pp 13th on par with peers
Chino, CA 95.9% 7th +6.0pp 14th 2% above peers
Avondale, AZ 92.5% 21st +5.6pp 15th 1% below peers
Bellingham, WA 93.9% 15th +5.4pp 16th on par with peers
Livonia, MI 94.6% 11th +5.4pp 17th 1% above peers
Toms River, NJ 91.7% 22nd +4.4pp 18th 2% below peers
San Marcos, CA 96.0% 6th +4.0pp 19th 2% above peers
Nashua, NH 93.4% 18th +3.8pp 20th on par with peers
Roswell, GA 96.6% 2nd +3.9pp 21st 3% above peers
Sandy, UT 93.6% 17th +3.7pp 22nd on par with peers
O'Fallon, MO 95.0% 10th +3.4pp 23rd 1% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 94.2% 13th +3.0pp 24th on par with peers
Hoover, AL 96.4% 4th +3.0pp 25th 3% above peers
Norwalk, CT 93.0% 20th +2.6pp 26th 1% below peers
Germantown, MD 96.6% 3rd +2.5pp 27th 3% above peers
Mission Viejo, CA 97.1% 1st +2.5pp 28th 3% above peers
Kirkland, WA 96.4% 5th +2.3pp 29th 3% above peers
Alafaya, FL 95.2% 8th +1.6pp 30th 2% above peers
Mount Pleasant, SC 84.1% 31st -8.8pp 31st 10% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 23 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds with a broadband internet subscription
Loading tract map…
7 of 23 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Olympia, WA up 11.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 85% of this group · 2019-2024
  • The Hammocks, FL up 11.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 82% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Redding, CA up 11.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 81% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.0pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Income inequality (Gini index)

▼ Lower is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Inequality rose about 8% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 0.40 to 0.43 - more than the combined survey margin (±0.02). 5 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 7 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: inequality rose about 11% from 2014 to 2024 (0.38 to 0.43).
0.43
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 0.49 +0.000
United States ref 0.48 +0.001
Indio, CA 0.43 12th -0.036 1st 4% below peers
Avondale, AZ 0.38 1st -0.023 2nd 16% below peers
Alafaya, FL 0.38 3rd -0.014 3rd 14% below peers
Arden-Arcade, CA 0.51 29th -0.017 4th 14% above peers
San Marcos, CA 0.44 15th -0.011 5th 1% below peers
O'Fallon, MO 0.38 2nd -0.009 6th 15% below peers
Germantown, MD 0.40 6th -0.009 7th 10% below peers
Roswell, GA 0.45 17th -0.009 8th 2% above peers
Merced, CA 0.47 21st -0.008 9th 4% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 0.54 31st -0.007 10th 22% above peers
Toms River, NJ 0.43 13th -0.005 11th 3% below peers
Norwalk, CT 0.49 27th -0.006 12th 11% above peers
Redding, CA 0.46 18th -0.003 13th 2% above peers
Fall River, MA 0.46 19th -0.003 14th 3% above peers
Fort Myers, FL 0.51 28th -0.001 15th 14% above peers
Nashua, NH 0.44 14th -0.001 16th 2% below peers
Livonia, MI 0.39 4th +0.000 17th 12% below peers
Greenville, NC 0.52 30th +0.001 18th 17% above peers
Erie, PA 0.46 20th +0.003 19th 4% above peers
Mission Viejo, CA 0.41 7th +0.003 20th 9% below peers
Hoover, AL 0.45 16th +0.005 21st on par with peers
Compton, CA 0.41 8th +0.004 22nd 7% below peers
Chino, CA 0.40 5th +0.005 23rd 11% below peers
Bellingham, WA 0.48 23rd +0.005 24th 7% above peers
South Gate, CA 0.42 9th +0.018 25th 6% below peers
Asheville, NC 0.49 25th +0.026 26th 10% above peers
Hemet, CA 0.47 22nd +0.027 27th 6% above peers
Sandy, UT 0.43 11th +0.028 28th 4% below peers
Carson, CA 0.43 10th +0.031 29th 4% below peers
Kirkland, WA 0.49 26th +0.043 30th 10% above peers
Mount Pleasant, SC 0.49 24th +0.045 31st 9% above peers
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B19083) through 2024 ±0.02 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Households receiving SNAP

▼ Lower is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →

SNAP rose 5.2 percentage points between the 2014-2018 and 2019-2023 surveys, from 7.6% to 12.7% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.2pp). 10 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening beyond the survey margin, 2014-2018 vs 2019-2023 surveys; 15 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: snap rose 6.8 percentage points from 2013 to 2023 (5.9% to 12.7%).
12.7%
20102023
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2019-2023 survey Today's rank Change2014-2018 → 2019-2023 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 11.4% +2.2pp
United States ref 11.8% -0.5pp
Roswell, GA 3.2% 3rd -2.8pp 1st 68% below peers
Mount Pleasant, SC 1.2% 1st -1.0pp 2nd 88% below peers
Nashua, NH 7.2% 12th -2.6pp 3rd 29% below peers
Sandy, UT 2.9% 2nd -0.8pp 4th 72% below peers
Fort Myers, FL 12.8% 22nd -3.4pp 5th 26% above peers
Avondale, AZ 12.0% 18th -2.6pp 6th 18% above peers
Bellingham, WA 12.2% 19th -1.8pp 7th 20% above peers
Alafaya, FL 8.6% 14th -0.8pp 8th 16% below peers
Chino, CA 7.7% 13th -0.4pp 9th 25% below peers
Toms River, NJ 5.4% 9th -0.1pp 10th 47% below peers
Kirkland, WA 3.6% 4th -0.1pp 11th 64% below peers
Greenville, NC 14.8% 23rd +0.1pp 12th 46% above peers
Erie, PA 30.2% 30th +1.0pp 13th 197% above peers
Germantown, MD 8.9% 15th +0.4pp 14th 12% below peers
Hoover, AL 4.1% 5th +0.2pp 15th 60% below peers
Livonia, MI 4.8% 7th +0.4pp 16th 53% below peers
Arden-Arcade, CA 17.5% 25th +1.8pp 17th 72% above peers
Hemet, CA 19.9% 26th +2.5pp 18th 96% above peers
Asheville, NC 11.8% 17th +1.5pp 19th 16% above peers
Fall River, MA 31.6% 31st +4.0pp 20th 211% above peers
Redding, CA 12.7% 21st +1.8pp 21st 25% above peers
O'Fallon, MO 4.5% 6th +0.6pp 22nd 56% below peers
Merced, CA 30.0% 29th +4.9pp 23rd 195% above peers
South Gate, CA 20.3% 27th +3.6pp 24th 99% above peers
San Marcos, CA 7.1% 11th +1.4pp 25th 30% below peers
Norwalk, CT 10.2% 16th +2.3pp 26th on par with peers
Compton, CA 25.0% 28th +5.7pp 27th 146% above peers
Carson, CA 12.7% 20th +5.1pp 28th 25% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 6.0% 10th +3.2pp 29th 41% below peers
Indio, CA 17.3% 24th +9.4pp 30th 70% above peers
Mission Viejo, CA 4.9% 8th +3.2pp 31st 52% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 23 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2018 to 2023, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds receiving SNAP
Loading tract map…
7 of 23 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Layton, UT down 4.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2018-2023
  • Logan, UT down 5.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2018-2023
  • Springdale, AR down 5.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2018-2023
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2023 ±1.9pp at 90% confidence (2023 estimate) survey trend: 2014-2018 vs 2019-2023 surveys about this metric
See all Economy data →
Housing
Housing

Typical home value

No better direction Rising recently
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Home value rose about 1% over the 12 months ending June 2026, faster than 59% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: home value rose about 3% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 52% of similar-size cities.
Longer view: home value rose about 10% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: $798,573 in June 2026, up from $790,060 a year earlier.
$798,573
2000June 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 28 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref $775,549 (Jun 26) -0.4%
United States ref $372,995 (Jun 26) +0.8%
Erie, PA $209,960 (Jun 26) 28th +5.9% 1st 59% below peers
Norwalk, CT $679,881 (Jun 26) 9th +5.0% 2nd 31% above peers
Toms River, NJ $470,769 (Jun 26) 16th +3.7% 3rd 9% below peers
Nashua, NH $517,357 (Jun 26) 14th +3.3% 4th on par with peers
Hoover, AL $445,051 (Jun 26) 20th +2.9% 5th 14% below peers
Livonia, MI $323,035 (Jun 26) 25th +2.8% 6th 38% below peers
Compton, CA $640,999 (Jun 26) 13th +2.6% 7th 24% above peers
South Gate, CA $701,329 (Jun 26) 8th +2.4% 8th 36% above peers
Fall River, MA $459,250 (Jun 26) 18th +2.3% 9th 11% below peers
Sandy, UT $670,855 (Jun 26) 11th +1.8% 10th 30% above peers
Greenville, NC $238,644 (Jun 26) 27th +1.3% 11th 54% below peers
Carson, CA $798,573 (Jun 26) 6th +1.1% 12th 54% above peers
Roswell, GA $666,641 (Jun 26) 12th +0.9% 13th 29% above peers
Santa Monica, CA $1,698,037 (Jun 26) 1st +0.8% 14th 228% above peers
Mission Viejo, CA $1,224,499 (Jun 26) 3rd +0.8% 15th 137% above peers
Mount Pleasant, SC $887,149 (Jun 26) 5th +0.4% 16th 71% above peers
Hemet, CA $445,921 (Jun 26) 19th -0.1% 17th 14% below peers
Bellingham, WA $674,798 (Jun 26) 10th -0.3% 18th 30% above peers
Chino, CA $758,989 (Jun 26) 7th -0.7% 19th 47% above peers
Redding, CA $394,739 (Jun 26) 24th -1.0% 20th 24% below peers
San Marcos, CA $957,606 (Jun 26) 4th -1.1% 21st 85% above peers
Merced, CA $397,690 (Jun 26) 23rd -1.5% 22nd 23% below peers
Indio, CA $513,884 (Jun 26) 15th -1.5% 23rd 1% below peers
Avondale, AZ $398,215 (Jun 26) 22nd -1.8% 24th 23% below peers
Germantown, MD $425,701 (Jun 26) 21st -2.8% 25th 18% below peers
Asheville, NC $464,131 (Jun 26) 17th -5.2% 26th 10% below peers
Kirkland, WA $1,227,283 (Jun 26) 2nd -5.3% 27th 137% above peers
Fort Myers, FL $309,562 (Jun 26) 26th -7.3% 28th 40% below peers
Zillow Home Value Index through 2026-06 modeled trend: robust fit about this metric
Housing

Starter home value (bottom tier)

No better direction Rising
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Starter homes was essentially flat over the 12 months ending June 2026.

Multi-year view: starter homes rose about 4% a year from 2021 to 2026, slower than 56% of similar-size cities.
Longer view: starter homes rose about 11% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: $668,515 in June 2026, up from $666,161 a year earlier.
$668,515
2000June 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 28 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref $474,537 (Jun 26) -0.7%
United States ref $202,486 (Jun 26) +2.0%
Erie, PA $129,940 (Jun 26) 28th +6.8% 1st 67% below peers
Norwalk, CT $439,024 (Jun 26) 13th +4.8% 2nd 11% above peers
Compton, CA $570,408 (Jun 26) 8th +3.9% 3rd 45% above peers
Nashua, NH $387,942 (Jun 26) 15th +3.5% 4th 2% below peers
Hoover, AL $316,421 (Jun 26) 22nd +3.4% 5th 20% below peers
Fall River, MA $370,359 (Jun 26) 16th +3.4% 6th 6% below peers
Livonia, MI $248,896 (Jun 26) 25th +3.4% 7th 37% below peers
South Gate, CA $637,011 (Jun 26) 6th +3.0% 8th 62% above peers
Toms River, NJ $329,204 (Jun 26) 19th +2.2% 9th 16% below peers
Sandy, UT $511,817 (Jun 26) 10th +1.3% 10th 30% above peers
Greenville, NC $157,988 (Jun 26) 27th +0.9% 11th 60% below peers
Bellingham, WA $486,485 (Jun 26) 11th +0.6% 12th 23% above peers
Roswell, GA $477,657 (Jun 26) 12th +0.5% 13th 21% above peers
Carson, CA $668,515 (Jun 26) 5th +0.4% 14th 70% above peers
Mission Viejo, CA $879,254 (Jun 26) 2nd +0.2% 15th 123% above peers
Indio, CA $394,123 (Jun 26) 14th +0.0% 16th on par with peers
Mount Pleasant, SC $557,254 (Jun 26) 9th -0.1% 17th 41% above peers
Chino, CA $619,935 (Jun 26) 7th -0.4% 18th 57% above peers
Merced, CA $324,862 (Jun 26) 21st -0.6% 19th 18% below peers
Redding, CA $304,862 (Jun 26) 24th -0.8% 20th 23% below peers
Hemet, CA $345,970 (Jun 26) 18th -0.9% 21st 12% below peers
San Marcos, CA $706,614 (Jun 26) 3rd -1.1% 22nd 79% above peers
Santa Monica, CA $956,112 (Jun 26) 1st -1.2% 23rd 143% above peers
Avondale, AZ $347,883 (Jun 26) 17th -1.8% 24th 12% below peers
Germantown, MD $311,886 (Jun 26) 23rd -3.7% 25th 21% below peers
Asheville, NC $325,051 (Jun 26) 20th -4.7% 26th 18% below peers
Kirkland, WA $698,475 (Jun 26) 4th -5.2% 27th 77% above peers
Fort Myers, FL $191,148 (Jun 26) 26th -9.5% 28th 52% below peers
Zillow Home Value Index through 2026-06 modeled trend: robust fit about this metric
Housing

Homeownership rate

▲ Higher is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Homeownership changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (73.1% then, 74.0% now; margin ±3.1pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 12 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: homeownership fell 0.7 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (74.7% to 74.0%).
74.0%
20112024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 55.9% +1.0pp
United States ref 65.2%
Avondale, AZ 61.6% 16th +6.6pp 1st on par with peers
Arden-Arcade, CA 46.1% 25th +4.7pp 2nd 25% below peers
Merced, CA 45.9% 26th +4.6pp 3rd 26% below peers
Asheville, NC 51.9% 23rd +3.7pp 4th 16% below peers
Hemet, CA 62.3% 15th +3.8pp 5th 1% above peers
Germantown, MD 67.2% 10th +4.1pp 6th 9% above peers
Erie, PA 54.1% 22nd +3.3pp 7th 12% below peers
South Gate, CA 45.3% 27th +2.5pp 8th 26% below peers
Roswell, GA 71.9% 8th +3.6pp 9th 17% above peers
Compton, CA 56.4% 18th +2.6pp 10th 8% below peers
Toms River, NJ 81.8% 2nd +2.5pp 11th 33% above peers
Alafaya, FL 64.4% 12th +1.7pp 12th 4% above peers
Hoover, AL 71.1% 9th +1.7pp 13th 15% above peers
San Marcos, CA 63.7% 14th +1.4pp 14th 3% above peers
Nashua, NH 55.8% 19th +1.0pp 15th 9% below peers
Mount Pleasant, SC 73.6% 7th +1.2pp 16th 19% above peers
Chino, CA 64.0% 13th +0.9pp 17th 4% above peers
Livonia, MI 87.2% 1st +1.1pp 18th 41% above peers
Carson, CA 74.0% 6th +0.9pp 19th 20% above peers
Redding, CA 54.8% 21st +0.6pp 20th 11% below peers
Mission Viejo, CA 76.9% 4th -0.0pp 21st 25% above peers
Fort Myers, FL 49.1% 24th -0.5pp 22nd 20% below peers
O'Fallon, MO 81.0% 3rd -1.1pp 23rd 31% above peers
Greenville, NC 32.7% 30th -0.5pp 24th 47% below peers
Bellingham, WA 44.6% 28th -0.8pp 25th 28% below peers
Fall River, MA 35.3% 29th -1.0pp 26th 43% below peers
Santa Monica, CA 27.9% 31st -1.1pp 27th 55% below peers
Kirkland, WA 60.8% 17th -2.6pp 28th 1% below peers
Norwalk, CT 55.6% 20th -2.4pp 29th 10% below peers
Sandy, UT 75.2% 5th -3.4pp 30th 22% above peers
Indio, CA 67.1% 11th -3.5pp 31st 9% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 23 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHomeownership rate
Loading tract map…
7 of 23 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±2.5pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Housing

Typical asking rent

No better direction Rising
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Rent was essentially flat over the 12 months ending June 2026.

Multi-year view: rent rose about 4% a year from 2022 to 2026, slower than 56% of similar-size cities.
Most recent monthly reading: $2,953 in June 2026, down from $2,956 a year earlier.
$2,953
2022June 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 28 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
United States ref $1,965 (Jun 26) +2.2%
South Gate, CA $2,002 (Jun 26) 14th +9.0% 1st on par with peers
Mission Viejo, CA $3,074 (Jun 26) 4th +7.7% 2nd 54% above peers
Indio, CA $2,616 (Jun 26) 9th +7.2% 3rd 31% above peers
Greenville, NC $1,346 (Jun 26) 27th +4.5% 4th 33% below peers
Fall River, MA $1,811 (Jun 26) 18th +3.3% 5th 10% below peers
Erie, PA $1,036 (Jun 26) 28th +3.3% 6th 48% below peers
Livonia, MI $1,662 (Jun 26) 24th +3.2% 7th 17% below peers
Redding, CA $1,642 (Jun 26) 25th +2.9% 8th 18% below peers
Nashua, NH $2,216 (Jun 26) 12th +2.7% 9th 11% above peers
Chino, CA $3,388 (Jun 26) 2nd +2.7% 10th 69% above peers
Toms River, NJ $2,797 (Jun 26) 6th +2.4% 11th 40% above peers
Merced, CA $1,964 (Jun 26) 16th +2.3% 12th 2% below peers
Kirkland, WA $2,626 (Jun 26) 8th +2.2% 13th 31% above peers
Norwalk, CT $2,718 (Jun 26) 7th +2.0% 14th 36% above peers
San Marcos, CA $3,258 (Jun 26) 3rd +1.9% 15th 63% above peers
Mount Pleasant, SC $2,425 (Jun 26) 11th +1.6% 16th 21% above peers
Santa Monica, CA $3,517 (Jun 26) 1st +1.5% 17th 76% above peers
Bellingham, WA $1,976 (Jun 26) 15th +1.2% 18th 1% below peers
Hoover, AL $1,378 (Jun 26) 26th +1.0% 19th 31% below peers
Asheville, NC $1,688 (Jun 26) 22nd +0.5% 20th 16% below peers
Roswell, GA $1,730 (Jun 26) 21st +0.3% 21st 14% below peers
Hemet, CA $1,939 (Jun 26) 17th +0.2% 22nd 3% below peers
Germantown, MD $2,137 (Jun 26) 13th +0.0% 23rd 7% above peers
Carson, CA $2,953 (Jun 26) 5th -0.1% 24th 47% above peers
Avondale, AZ $1,809 (Jun 26) 19th -0.6% 25th 10% below peers
Sandy, UT $1,681 (Jun 26) 23rd -0.9% 26th 16% below peers
Fort Myers, FL $1,779 (Jun 26) 20th -1.6% 27th 11% below peers
Compton, CA $2,500 (Jun 26) 10th -3.8% 28th 25% above peers
Zillow Observed Rent Index through 2026-06 modeled trend: robust fit about this metric
Housing

Housing cost-burdened households

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Cost burden changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (34.9% then, 34.5% now; margin ±3.4pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 8 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: cost burden fell 8.6 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (43.1% to 34.5%).
34.5%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 41.7% +0.0pp
United States ref 32.2% +0.4pp
Toms River, NJ 30.6% 7th -6.2pp 1st 19% below peers
Germantown, MD 29.9% 6th -4.0pp 2nd 20% below peers
South Gate, CA 45.1% 28th -5.8pp 3rd 20% above peers
Compton, CA 48.1% 31st -4.4pp 4th 28% above peers
Asheville, NC 36.1% 14th -3.0pp 5th 4% below peers
Indio, CA 41.4% 19th -3.4pp 6th 10% above peers
Greenville, NC 40.8% 18th -2.9pp 7th 9% above peers
Arden-Arcade, CA 44.8% 26th -1.7pp 8th 19% above peers
Merced, CA 43.4% 23rd -0.6pp 9th 16% above peers
Hemet, CA 46.6% 29th -0.5pp 10th 24% above peers
Carson, CA 34.5% 12th -0.4pp 11th 8% below peers
Roswell, GA 26.8% 5th -0.3pp 12th 29% below peers
Norwalk, CT 41.7% 20th -0.4pp 13th 11% above peers
Nashua, NH 33.8% 11th -0.3pp 14th 10% below peers
Redding, CA 39.6% 17th -0.2pp 15th 6% above peers
Hoover, AL 24.2% 3rd +0.0pp 16th 35% below peers
San Marcos, CA 43.8% 24th +0.6pp 17th 17% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 42.5% 22nd +1.0pp 18th 13% above peers
Chino, CA 42.5% 21st +1.2pp 19th 13% above peers
Alafaya, FL 32.6% 9th +1.0pp 20th 13% below peers
Erie, PA 36.1% 15th +1.5pp 21st 4% below peers
Sandy, UT 24.4% 4th +1.1pp 22nd 35% below peers
Avondale, AZ 35.2% 13th +1.6pp 23rd 6% below peers
Livonia, MI 20.5% 1st +0.9pp 24th 45% below peers
O'Fallon, MO 21.0% 2nd +1.2pp 25th 44% below peers
Mission Viejo, CA 37.5% 16th +2.8pp 26th on par with peers
Fall River, MA 44.8% 27th +3.8pp 27th 19% above peers
Mount Pleasant, SC 31.2% 8th +2.8pp 28th 17% below peers
Bellingham, WA 47.0% 30th +4.9pp 29th 25% above peers
Kirkland, WA 32.9% 10th +4.0pp 30th 12% below peers
Fort Myers, FL 44.6% 25th +5.7pp 31st 19% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 23 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHousing cost-burdened households
Loading tract map…
7 of 23 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Des Plaines, IL down 5.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Newark, OH down 5.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Toms River, NJ down 6.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (tables B25070 + B25091) through 2024 ±2.4pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Housing

Households without a vehicle

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

No vehicle changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (3.6% then, 4.6% now; margin ±1.3pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 5 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: no vehicle rose 0.2 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (4.3% to 4.6%).
4.6%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 7.1% -0.0pp
United States ref 8.3% -0.3pp
Sandy, UT 2.5% 2nd -1.8pp 1st 65% below peers
Mount Pleasant, SC 2.6% 3rd -1.6pp 2nd 62% below peers
Alafaya, FL 1.6% 1st -0.5pp 3rd 78% below peers
San Marcos, CA 3.5% 8th -1.0pp 4th 50% below peers
Roswell, GA 3.5% 7th -0.9pp 5th 50% below peers
Bellingham, WA 9.5% 26th -2.3pp 6th 36% above peers
Livonia, MI 3.2% 5th -0.7pp 7th 55% below peers
Merced, CA 8.9% 24th -1.8pp 8th 27% above peers
Fort Myers, FL 10.2% 27th -1.7pp 9th 45% above peers
Redding, CA 7.7% 20th -1.1pp 10th 10% above peers
Fall River, MA 16.4% 30th -2.0pp 11th 134% above peers
Erie, PA 17.2% 31st -1.4pp 12th 145% above peers
Compton, CA 7.0% 16th -0.6pp 13th on par with peers
Avondale, AZ 4.6% 11th -0.2pp 14th 34% below peers
South Gate, CA 7.7% 19th -0.3pp 15th 9% above peers
Greenville, NC 10.7% 28th -0.4pp 16th 53% above peers
Kirkland, WA 4.8% 14th -0.2pp 17th 32% below peers
Toms River, NJ 6.1% 15th -0.2pp 18th 14% below peers
Arden-Arcade, CA 8.4% 22nd -0.2pp 19th 20% above peers
Mission Viejo, CA 2.8% 4th -0.0pp 20th 60% below peers
Indio, CA 4.0% 9th -0.0pp 21st 43% below peers
Nashua, NH 7.9% 21st -0.0pp 22nd 12% above peers
Hemet, CA 9.0% 25th -0.0pp 23rd 28% above peers
Asheville, NC 7.6% 18th +0.0pp 24th 9% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 11.4% 29th +0.9pp 25th 63% above peers
Norwalk, CT 8.5% 23rd +1.7pp 26th 21% above peers
Carson, CA 4.6% 10th +1.0pp 27th 35% below peers
Hoover, AL 3.4% 6th +0.9pp 28th 52% below peers
Chino, CA 4.6% 12th +1.2pp 29th 34% below peers
Germantown, MD 7.5% 17th +2.0pp 30th 6% above peers
O'Fallon, MO 4.7% 13th +1.6pp 31st 33% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 23 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHouseholds without a vehicle
Loading tract map…
7 of 23 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Apopka, FL down 2.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Sandy, UT down 1.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Mount Pleasant, SC down 1.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B08201) through 2024 ±1.1pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Housing data →
Health
Health

People without health insurance

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (7.1% then, 6.6% now; margin ±1.0pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 13 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: uninsured fell 9.3 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (15.9% to 6.6%).
6.6%
20122024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 6.5% -0.9pp
United States ref 8.2% -0.4pp
Norwalk, CT 10.3% 26th -6.3pp 1st 56% above peers
Roswell, GA 8.4% 23rd -3.8pp 2nd 28% above peers
Sandy, UT 5.3% 11th -1.9pp 3rd 19% below peers
Mission Viejo, CA 3.2% 2nd -1.1pp 4th 52% below peers
Santa Monica, CA 3.5% 3rd -1.0pp 5th 47% below peers
Hemet, CA 7.0% 18th -1.8pp 6th 6% above peers
Alafaya, FL 8.1% 22nd -1.8pp 7th 23% above peers
Toms River, NJ 4.8% 7th -1.0pp 8th 27% below peers
San Marcos, CA 7.1% 19th -1.4pp 9th 7% above peers
South Gate, CA 12.8% 29th -2.3pp 10th 93% above peers
Mount Pleasant, SC 4.0% 6th -0.7pp 11th 39% below peers
Arden-Arcade, CA 5.1% 9th -0.9pp 12th 23% below peers
Erie, PA 5.7% 12th -0.8pp 13th 14% below peers
Livonia, MI 2.5% 1st -0.2pp 14th 62% below peers
Chino, CA 6.7% 17th -0.5pp 15th 2% above peers
Carson, CA 6.6% 16th -0.5pp 16th on par with peers
O'Fallon, MO 3.9% 5th -0.3pp 17th 41% below peers
Hoover, AL 5.0% 8th -0.3pp 18th 24% below peers
Germantown, MD 6.3% 14th -0.3pp 19th 5% below peers
Kirkland, WA 3.8% 4th -0.1pp 20th 42% below peers
Greenville, NC 9.4% 25th +0.0pp 21st 42% above peers
Merced, CA 7.5% 20th +0.1pp 22nd 14% above peers
Bellingham, WA 5.3% 10th +0.2pp 23rd 20% below peers
Compton, CA 12.4% 28th +0.8pp 24th 88% above peers
Redding, CA 6.5% 15th +0.5pp 25th 1% below peers
Asheville, NC 11.6% 27th +1.0pp 26th 75% above peers
Fort Myers, FL 17.3% 31st +2.1pp 27th 162% above peers
Indio, CA 9.0% 24th +1.2pp 28th 36% above peers
Avondale, AZ 13.3% 30th +2.1pp 29th 101% above peers
Nashua, NH 7.9% 21st +1.9pp 30th 19% above peers
Fall River, MA 5.7% 13th +1.4pp 31st 14% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 23 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthPeople without health insurance
Loading tract map…
7 of 23 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Tigard, OR down 4.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Lenexa, KS down 3.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Lakewood, NJ down 3.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.7pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Health

Adult obesity

▼ Lower is better Level only
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Adult obesity is somewhat below the peer median.

25.9%
20202022
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities best first
Place Latest Today's rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 28.4%
United States ref 33.4%
Kirkland, WA 22.4% 1st 28% below peers
Santa Monica, CA 23.0% 2nd 26% below peers
Mission Viejo, CA 25.0% 3rd 20% below peers
Germantown, MD 25.0% 4th 20% below peers
Mount Pleasant, SC 25.3% 5th 19% below peers
San Marcos, CA 25.7% 6th 17% below peers
Carson, CA 25.9% 7th 17% below peers
Roswell, GA 26.6% 8th 14% below peers
Norwalk, CT 26.7% 9th 14% below peers
Asheville, NC 28.1% 10th 10% below peers
Redding, CA 29.0% 11th 7% below peers
Bellingham, WA 29.0% 12th 7% below peers
Livonia, MI 29.4% 13th 5% below peers
Alafaya, FL 30.3% 14th 3% below peers
Nashua, NH 31.0% 15th on par with peers
Sandy, UT 31.1% 16th on par with peers
Toms River, NJ 31.1% 17th on par with peers
South Gate, CA 31.6% 18th 2% above peers
Chino, CA 31.9% 19th 3% above peers
Hoover, AL 32.5% 20th 5% above peers
Fort Myers, FL 33.9% 21st 9% above peers
Compton, CA 34.2% 22nd 10% above peers
Merced, CA 34.4% 23rd 11% above peers
O'Fallon, MO 35.5% 24th 14% above peers
Fall River, MA 36.0% 25th 16% above peers
Avondale, AZ 36.2% 26th 16% above peers
Arden-Arcade, CA 36.3% 27th 17% above peers
Indio, CA 36.7% 28th 18% above peers
Hemet, CA 38.3% 29th 23% above peers
Greenville, NC 38.8% 30th 25% above peers
Erie, PA 40.8% 31st 31% above peers
CDC PLACES through 2022 modeled tract map about this metric
Health

Children without health insurance

▼ Lower is better Turning up (early signal)
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Child uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (3.0% then, 3.6% now; margin ±1.7pp). The newest releases lean upward: each of the last 3 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 12 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: child uninsured fell 3.5 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (7.1% to 3.6%).
3.6%
20122024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 3.2% -0.0pp
United States ref 5.5% +0.4pp
Norwalk, CT 5.6% 28th -17.1pp 1st 59% above peers
Roswell, GA 3.8% 19th -3.9pp 2nd 7% above peers
Chino, CA 3.4% 13th -3.4pp 3rd 4% below peers
Santa Monica, CA 2.2% 5th -2.0pp 4th 37% below peers
Mission Viejo, CA 2.1% 3rd -1.7pp 5th 41% below peers
Livonia, MI 0.9% 1st -0.7pp 6th 73% below peers
O'Fallon, MO 2.1% 4th -1.2pp 7th 40% below peers
Sandy, UT 3.5% 14th -1.9pp 8th 1% below peers
Hemet, CA 4.4% 25th -2.3pp 9th 24% above peers
South Gate, CA 4.2% 23rd -2.1pp 10th 17% above peers
Alafaya, FL 4.1% 22nd -1.9pp 11th 17% above peers
Erie, PA 2.4% 7th -1.0pp 12th 34% below peers
Arden-Arcade, CA 1.6% 2nd -0.4pp 13th 54% below peers
Germantown, MD 2.5% 9th -0.4pp 14th 28% below peers
Asheville, NC 3.9% 20th -0.4pp 15th 11% above peers
San Marcos, CA 2.6% 10th -0.1pp 16th 27% below peers
Toms River, NJ 3.5% 16th -0.1pp 17th on par with peers
Merced, CA 3.4% 12th +0.5pp 18th 5% below peers
Hoover, AL 2.5% 8th +0.4pp 19th 29% below peers
Carson, CA 3.6% 18th +0.6pp 20th 2% above peers
Redding, CA 4.6% 27th +1.0pp 21st 30% above peers
Fall River, MA 2.3% 6th +0.6pp 22nd 35% below peers
Compton, CA 4.6% 26th +1.2pp 23rd 29% above peers
Fort Myers, FL 15.2% 31st +4.2pp 24th 331% above peers
Avondale, AZ 11.4% 30th +3.4pp 25th 223% above peers
Bellingham, WA 3.6% 17th +1.4pp 26th 1% above peers
Indio, CA 3.5% 15th +1.4pp 27th 1% below peers
Mount Pleasant, SC 4.2% 24th +1.6pp 28th 17% above peers
Greenville, NC 4.0% 21st +1.8pp 29th 12% above peers
Kirkland, WA 3.1% 11th +1.9pp 30th 12% below peers
Nashua, NH 6.8% 29th +5.1pp 31st 91% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 23 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthChildren without health insurance
Loading tract map…
7 of 23 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Southfield, MI down 2.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Mountain View, CA down 2.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Mayagüez zona urbana, PR down 3.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B27001) through 2024 ±1.3pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys *Early signal: consecutive releases agree on direction only; the size of the newest movement is not measurable from overlapping surveys. about this metric
See all Health data →
Education
Education

Adults with a bachelor's degree or higher

▲ Higher is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

College attainment changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (28.3% then, 29.3% now; margin ±2.4pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 21 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: college attainment rose 5.1 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (24.2% to 29.3%).
29.3%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 37.1% +3.1pp
United States ref 35.7% +3.5pp
Hemet, CA 15.5% 29th +4.4pp 1st 62% below peers
Compton, CA 10.6% 31st +2.0pp 2nd 74% below peers
Merced, CA 20.2% 27th +3.7pp 3rd 51% below peers
South Gate, CA 11.3% 30th +1.8pp 4th 73% below peers
Indio, CA 20.5% 26th +3.3pp 5th 50% below peers
Chino, CA 27.2% 22nd +4.2pp 6th 34% below peers
San Marcos, CA 43.8% 13th +6.8pp 7th 6% above peers
Alafaya, FL 50.0% 9th +6.8pp 8th 21% above peers
Toms River, NJ 36.4% 19th +4.8pp 9th 12% below peers
Avondale, AZ 21.3% 25th +2.8pp 10th 48% below peers
Nashua, NH 41.2% 16th +5.1pp 11th on par with peers
Roswell, GA 66.0% 4th +7.9pp 12th 60% above peers
Livonia, MI 41.9% 15th +4.5pp 13th 2% above peers
Arden-Arcade, CA 38.5% 18th +3.7pp 14th 7% below peers
Sandy, UT 46.0% 11th +4.2pp 15th 12% above peers
Bellingham, WA 48.5% 10th +4.2pp 16th 18% above peers
Asheville, NC 53.4% 6th +4.5pp 17th 29% above peers
Hoover, AL 62.6% 5th +5.0pp 18th 52% above peers
Kirkland, WA 66.3% 3rd +5.0pp 19th 61% above peers
Fort Myers, FL 32.0% 20th +2.3pp 20th 22% below peers
Mount Pleasant, SC 68.4% 2nd +4.5pp 21st 66% above peers
Erie, PA 23.1% 24th +1.5pp 22nd 44% below peers
Fall River, MA 16.4% 28th +1.0pp 23rd 60% below peers
Mission Viejo, CA 52.1% 7th +3.0pp 24th 26% above peers
Redding, CA 26.9% 23rd +1.2pp 25th 35% below peers
O'Fallon, MO 43.3% 14th +1.8pp 26th 5% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 70.7% 1st +2.8pp 27th 72% above peers
Carson, CA 29.3% 21st +1.1pp 28th 29% below peers
Greenville, NC 39.1% 17th +1.4pp 29th 5% below peers
Norwalk, CT 44.8% 12th +1.4pp 30th 9% above peers
Germantown, MD 50.4% 8th +0.3pp 31st 22% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 23 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationAdults with a bachelor's degree or higher
Loading tract map…
7 of 23 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • St. Cloud, FL up 13.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Lawrence, MA up 6.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Kissimmee, FL up 8.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.8pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Education

Children ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool

▲ Higher is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Preschool enrollment changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (51.8% then, 43.7% now; margin ±13.7pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 13 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: preschool enrollment fell 14.0 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (57.7% to 43.7%).
43.7%
20112024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 44.5% -5.1pp
United States ref 45.5%
Toms River, NJ 70.6% 3rd +11.2pp 1st 57% above peers
Greenville, NC 53.1% 10th +4.9pp 2nd 18% above peers
Livonia, MI 62.8% 5th +5.2pp 3rd 40% above peers
Chino, CA 45.2% 15th +3.2pp 4th 1% above peers
Norwalk, CT 75.6% 1st +5.3pp 5th 68% above peers
Roswell, GA 66.5% 4th +2.3pp 6th 48% above peers
Arden-Arcade, CA 43.5% 19th +1.2pp 7th 3% below peers
Bellingham, WA 56.6% 8th +1.1pp 8th 26% above peers
Germantown, MD 50.8% 12th -0.2pp 9th 13% above peers
Erie, PA 44.9% 16th -1.2pp 10th on par with peers
Redding, CA 50.0% 14th -2.2pp 11th 11% above peers
O'Fallon, MO 55.7% 9th -3.5pp 12th 24% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 71.9% 2nd -5.0pp 13th 60% above peers
Sandy, UT 51.2% 11th -4.6pp 14th 14% above peers
Mount Pleasant, SC 62.6% 6th -8.9pp 15th 39% above peers
Carson, CA 43.7% 18th -8.1pp 16th 3% below peers
Kirkland, WA 57.9% 7th -11.4pp 17th 29% above peers
South Gate, CA 37.4% 22nd -7.4pp 18th 17% below peers
San Marcos, CA 50.5% 13th -14.5pp 19th 12% above peers
Compton, CA 37.9% 21st -11.7pp 20th 16% below peers
Fall River, MA 37.1% 23rd -11.9pp 21st 18% below peers
Hemet, CA 22.6% 29th -11.4pp 22nd 50% below peers
Nashua, NH 39.2% 20th -20.5pp 23rd 13% below peers
Merced, CA 36.2% 24th -19.4pp 24th 19% below peers
Asheville, NC 36.1% 25th -20.9pp 25th 20% below peers
Mission Viejo, CA 44.0% 17th -25.8pp 26th 2% below peers
Hoover, AL 36.1% 26th -24.8pp 27th 20% below peers
Fort Myers, FL 33.2% 27th -23.2pp 28th 26% below peers
Indio, CA 21.5% 30th -16.3pp 29th 52% below peers
Alafaya, FL 31.9% 28th -31.7pp 30th 29% below peers
Avondale, AZ 14.8% 31st -22.2pp 31st 67% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 23 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationChildren ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool
Loading tract map…
6 of 23 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 4 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • West Haven, CT up 35.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Castle Rock, CO up 21.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 96% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Cedar Park, TX up 20.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 94% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±10.9pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Education

Teens not in school and not working

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Disconnected youth changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (7.9% then, 10.0% now; margin ±4.6pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 4 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: disconnected youth rose 1.6 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (8.4% to 10.0%).
10.0%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 6.7% +0.2pp
United States ref 6.9% +0.3pp
Chino, CA 2.7% 6th -7.8pp 1st 47% below peers
Norwalk, CT 2.0% 4th -5.1pp 2nd 60% below peers
Avondale, AZ 4.2% 9th -6.6pp 3rd 17% below peers
Alafaya, FL 1.5% 2nd -2.2pp 4th 71% below peers
Mission Viejo, CA 1.1% 1st -1.5pp 5th 78% below peers
Hemet, CA 7.9% 22nd -5.8pp 6th 56% above peers
Arden-Arcade, CA 5.2% 17th -3.2pp 7th 2% above peers
Hoover, AL 1.7% 3rd -1.0pp 8th 66% below peers
Livonia, MI 3.5% 8th -1.5pp 9th 30% below peers
San Marcos, CA 4.3% 11th -1.5pp 10th 15% below peers
Greenville, NC 2.7% 5th -0.5pp 11th 47% below peers
Fall River, MA 7.2% 21st -1.4pp 12th 42% above peers
Nashua, NH 5.4% 18th -0.4pp 13th 7% above peers
Fort Myers, FL 8.6% 24th -0.5pp 14th 71% above peers
Compton, CA 13.2% 31st -0.3pp 15th 161% above peers
Toms River, NJ 4.5% 14th -0.0pp 16th 11% below peers
Merced, CA 11.9% 30th +0.8pp 17th 135% above peers
Indio, CA 9.1% 25th +0.6pp 18th 79% above peers
Kirkland, WA 3.1% 7th +0.3pp 19th 39% below peers
South Gate, CA 9.4% 26th +1.0pp 20th 86% above peers
Erie, PA 9.8% 27th +1.6pp 21st 93% above peers
Redding, CA 8.3% 23rd +1.4pp 22nd 65% above peers
Carson, CA 10.0% 28th +2.1pp 23rd 98% above peers
Asheville, NC 5.7% 19th +1.4pp 24th 13% above peers
Sandy, UT 5.0% 16th +1.4pp 25th on par with peers
Santa Monica, CA 4.8% 15th +1.4pp 26th 4% below peers
Roswell, GA 6.7% 20th +2.1pp 27th 33% above peers
O'Fallon, MO 4.2% 10th +1.5pp 28th 16% below peers
Bellingham, WA 4.5% 13th +1.6pp 29th 11% below peers
Germantown, MD 4.4% 12th +2.0pp 30th 14% below peers
Mount Pleasant, SC 10.8% 29th +9.9pp 31st 114% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 23 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationTeens not in school and not working
Loading tract map…
7 of 23 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Alpharetta, GA down 6.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Eagan, MN down 4.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Johns Creek, GA down 4.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B14005) through 2024 ±3.7pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Education data →
Demographics
Demographics

Population

No better direction Rising
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Population rose about 1% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 92,079 to 92,871 - more than the combined survey margin (±142). That reverses the previous span, which went down between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys. 18 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. The newest releases lean downward: each of the last 3 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*

Rising beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 28 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: population held roughly steady from 2014 to 2024.
92,871
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Fort Myers, FL 95,051 1st +19% 1st 3% above peers
Merced, CA 91,953 25th +11% 2nd 1% below peers
Avondale, AZ 92,477 21st +9% 3rd on par with peers
Hoover, AL 92,642 18th +9% 4th on par with peers
Mount Pleasant, SC 93,993 8th +8% 5th 1% above peers
Hemet, CA 91,326 28th +8% 6th 1% below peers
O'Fallon, MO 93,801 11th +8% 7th 1% above peers
Toms River, NJ 94,956 3rd +6% 8th 2% above peers
Bellingham, WA 93,438 12th +5% 9th 1% above peers
Fall River, MA 94,082 7th +5% 10th 1% above peers
Norwalk, CT 92,187 23rd +4% 11th 1% below peers
Kirkland, WA 92,621 19th +4% 12th on par with peers
Chino, CA 92,652 17th +3% 13th on par with peers
Asheville, NC 94,535 5th +3% 14th 2% above peers
Nashua, NH 91,294 29th +3% 15th 2% below peers
Indio, CA 91,950 26th +3% 16th 1% below peers
Redding, CA 93,409 13th +2% 17th 1% above peers
Alafaya, FL 92,449 22nd +2% 18th on par with peers
Greenville, NC 92,857 15th +1% 19th on par with peers
Carson, CA 92,871 14th +1% 20th on par with peers
Germantown, MD 90,719 31st +0% 21st 2% below peers
Livonia, MI 93,851 9th -0% 22nd 1% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 91,169 30th -0% 23rd 2% below peers
San Marcos, CA 94,882 4th -0% 24th 2% above peers
Sandy, UT 94,291 6th -2% 25th 2% above peers
Roswell, GA 92,621 20th -2% 26th on par with peers
South Gate, CA 91,483 27th -3% 27th 1% below peers
Erie, PA 93,850 10th -4% 28th 1% above peers
Mission Viejo, CA 92,151 24th -4% 29th 1% below peers
Compton, CA 92,698 16th -4% 30th on par with peers
Arden-Arcade, CA 94,994 2nd -8% 31st 2% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 23 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsPopulation
Loading tract map…
7 of 23 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±74 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Children's share of the population

No better direction No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Children changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (20.3% then, 20.1% now; margin ±1.5pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 14 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: children fell 1.1 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (21.2% to 20.1%).
20.1%
20172024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 21.9% -0.9pp
United States ref 21.6% -0.7pp
Chino, CA 24.6% 7th +4.4pp 1st 10% above peers
Indio, CA 24.8% 6th +2.4pp 2nd 11% above peers
Mission Viejo, CA 20.4% 20th +1.1pp 3rd 8% below peers
Sandy, UT 26.4% 4th +1.2pp 4th 19% above peers
Greenville, NC 18.8% 26th +0.6pp 5th 16% below peers
Merced, CA 29.9% 1st +0.4pp 6th 34% above peers
Toms River, NJ 22.3% 16th +0.2pp 7th on par with peers
Livonia, MI 18.7% 27th +0.2pp 8th 16% below peers
Redding, CA 22.2% 17th +0.2pp 9th on par with peers
Carson, CA 20.1% 21st -0.1pp 10th 10% below peers
Arden-Arcade, CA 22.8% 13th -0.4pp 11th 3% above peers
Roswell, GA 24.5% 8th -0.6pp 12th 10% above peers
Fall River, MA 19.9% 22nd -0.8pp 13th 11% below peers
San Marcos, CA 25.2% 5th -1.0pp 14th 13% above peers
Mount Pleasant, SC 22.8% 14th -1.0pp 15th 2% above peers
Nashua, NH 18.6% 28th -0.8pp 16th 16% below peers
Kirkland, WA 19.3% 23rd -1.1pp 17th 13% below peers
Norwalk, CT 18.8% 25th -1.3pp 18th 15% below peers
Compton, CA 27.4% 2nd -1.9pp 19th 23% above peers
Erie, PA 21.4% 18th -1.6pp 20th 4% below peers
Hoover, AL 24.4% 9th -1.8pp 21st 10% above peers
Alafaya, FL 21.2% 19th -1.6pp 22nd 5% below peers
Bellingham, WA 13.8% 30th -1.1pp 23rd 38% below peers
Santa Monica, CA 13.8% 31st -1.1pp 24th 38% below peers
Fort Myers, FL 19.1% 24th -1.6pp 25th 14% below peers
Avondale, AZ 26.8% 3rd -2.4pp 26th 20% above peers
Germantown, MD 23.0% 12th -2.8pp 27th 3% above peers
O'Fallon, MO 24.2% 10th -2.9pp 28th 9% above peers
Hemet, CA 23.1% 11th -3.1pp 29th 4% above peers
South Gate, CA 22.6% 15th -4.4pp 30th 2% above peers
Asheville, NC 14.8% 29th -3.0pp 31st 33% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 23 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren's share of the population
Loading tract map…
7 of 23 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.3pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Children in single-parent families

No better direction No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Single-parent changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (27.6% then, 27.9% now; margin ±6.6pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 5 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: single-parent fell 2.4 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (30.4% to 27.9%).
27.9%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 28.5% +0.7pp
United States ref 29.9% -0.2pp
Sandy, UT 20.5% 22nd +5.2pp 1st 29% below peers
Livonia, MI 19.2% 27th +3.6pp 2nd 33% below peers
Santa Monica, CA 25.9% 19th +4.4pp 3rd 10% below peers
Hemet, CA 39.1% 7th +6.6pp 4th 36% above peers
Greenville, NC 56.0% 3rd +8.4pp 5th 95% above peers
Erie, PA 62.3% 1st +5.6pp 6th 117% above peers
Merced, CA 48.8% 4th +3.9pp 7th 70% above peers
Fall River, MA 57.9% 2nd +3.5pp 8th 102% above peers
Asheville, NC 32.2% 11th +2.0pp 9th 12% above peers
Redding, CA 35.0% 9th +2.1pp 10th 22% above peers
Hoover, AL 19.7% 24th +1.2pp 11th 31% below peers
Bellingham, WA 29.1% 15th +1.3pp 12th 1% above peers
O'Fallon, MO 20.5% 23rd +0.7pp 13th 29% below peers
Nashua, NH 30.4% 14th +0.8pp 14th 6% above peers
Norwalk, CT 28.7% 16th +0.5pp 15th on par with peers
South Gate, CA 40.3% 6th +0.7pp 16th 40% above peers
Carson, CA 27.9% 18th +0.3pp 17th 3% below peers
Kirkland, WA 15.2% 29th +0.0pp 18th 47% below peers
Avondale, AZ 34.9% 10th -0.6pp 19th 21% above peers
Mount Pleasant, SC 13.9% 30th -0.3pp 20th 52% below peers
Compton, CA 38.0% 8th -1.2pp 21st 32% above peers
Fort Myers, FL 45.2% 5th -1.8pp 22nd 57% above peers
Germantown, MD 30.4% 13th -1.5pp 23rd 6% above peers
San Marcos, CA 20.8% 21st -2.5pp 24th 28% below peers
Chino, CA 21.2% 20th -2.7pp 25th 26% below peers
Arden-Arcade, CA 30.9% 12th -5.6pp 26th 8% above peers
Indio, CA 28.1% 17th -5.4pp 27th 2% below peers
Roswell, GA 19.3% 26th -4.1pp 28th 33% below peers
Toms River, NJ 19.3% 25th -5.3pp 29th 33% below peers
Alafaya, FL 18.6% 28th -7.1pp 30th 35% below peers
Mission Viejo, CA 10.4% 31st -5.5pp 31st 64% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 23 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren in single-parent families
Loading tract map…
7 of 23 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B09002) through 2024 ±4.7pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Young children with all parents in the labor force

No better direction No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Working parents changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (67.7% then, 75.7% now; margin ±9.9pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 5 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: working parents rose 2.4 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (73.3% to 75.7%).
75.7%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 66.5% +3.8pp
United States ref 68.1% +1.9pp
Santa Monica, CA 86.6% 1st +21.8pp 1st 23% above peers
Arden-Arcade, CA 69.3% 17th +14.3pp 2nd 1% below peers
Asheville, NC 79.4% 2nd +15.2pp 3rd 13% above peers
Sandy, UT 65.3% 24th +10.8pp 4th 7% below peers
Merced, CA 64.6% 26th +10.6pp 5th 8% below peers
Norwalk, CT 76.9% 5th +9.7pp 6th 9% above peers
Roswell, GA 76.6% 6th +9.3pp 7th 9% above peers
Carson, CA 75.7% 9th +8.0pp 8th 8% above peers
Kirkland, WA 65.8% 22nd +6.7pp 9th 6% below peers
Redding, CA 67.7% 19th +6.8pp 10th 4% below peers
Livonia, MI 73.9% 13th +7.4pp 11th 5% above peers
Fall River, MA 75.5% 11th +7.1pp 12th 7% above peers
Greenville, NC 76.9% 4th +6.2pp 13th 9% above peers
Nashua, NH 78.2% 3rd +6.0pp 14th 11% above peers
San Marcos, CA 71.3% 15th +5.5pp 15th 1% above peers
Compton, CA 64.7% 25th +4.9pp 16th 8% below peers
Bellingham, WA 68.9% 18th +5.1pp 17th 2% below peers
Mission Viejo, CA 70.3% 16th +5.1pp 18th on par with peers
Chino, CA 63.5% 30th +4.0pp 19th 10% below peers
Hemet, CA 64.3% 29th +3.6pp 20th 9% below peers
O'Fallon, MO 75.7% 8th +4.2pp 21st 8% above peers
Avondale, AZ 67.6% 20th +2.9pp 22nd 4% below peers
Toms River, NJ 76.0% 7th +3.0pp 23rd 8% above peers
Germantown, MD 75.7% 10th +2.7pp 24th 8% above peers
Hoover, AL 74.2% 12th +2.5pp 25th 5% above peers
South Gate, CA 73.5% 14th +1.8pp 26th 5% above peers
Erie, PA 66.2% 21st -4.5pp 27th 6% below peers
Indio, CA 64.5% 27th -5.4pp 28th 8% below peers
Mount Pleasant, SC 64.4% 28th -6.0pp 29th 8% below peers
Fort Myers, FL 65.4% 23rd -7.2pp 30th 7% below peers
Alafaya, FL 61.9% 31st -9.1pp 31st 12% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 23 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsYoung children with all parents in the labor force
Loading tract map…
7 of 23 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B23008) through 2024 ±8.1pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Demographics data →