DataWorks Commons
Newton, MA
← All cities
89,044 people (2024) 50k-100k Northeast

Bright spots 13 indicators

Where Newton, MA shows a real improvement in recent years, or stands clearly ahead of its peers. How this is calculated →

What needs attention 4 indicators

Where Newton, MA shows a real worsening in recent years, or trails its peers clearly. How this is calculated →

Big shifts 7 indicators

Real moves and big gaps, where neither direction is simply good or bad. Biggest relative change first; big-gap cards come last. How this is calculated →

All indicators

Public Safety
Public Safety

Violent crime rate

▼ Lower is better Worsening recently, faster than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Violent crime rose about 61% over the 12 months ending December 2025, faster than 100% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: violent crime fell about 2% a year from 2020 to 2025, faster than 50% of similar-size cities. The change does not yet pass the noise and consistency checks, so treat it as a raw signal.
Longer view: violent crime fell about 2% a year from 2018 to 2025.
Most recent monthly reading: 78 in December 2025, up from 48 a year earlier.
78 per 100k
2018December 2025
Compare all 19 similar-size cities by change rank
Each place's latest 12 months compares against its prior 12. significant improvement · significant worsening · within chance fluctuation for counts this size (Poisson test at 90%; these are administrative tallies, so the test covers event randomness, not survey error).
Place Latestper 100k Today's rank Changelast 12 months Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
U.S. (RTCI sample) ref 456 (Apr 26) -9.3%
Danbury, CT 93 (May 26) 3rd -68.2% 1st 64% below peers
Clifton, NJ 127 (May 26) 6th -32.0% 2nd 50% below peers
Santa Fe, NM 70 (May 26) 1st -22.9% 3rd 73% below peers
Bloomington, MN 226 (May 26) 9th -21.0% 4th 12% below peers
Mission, TX 124 (May 26) 5th -18.4% 5th 51% below peers
Champaign, IL 382 (May 26) 14th -18.0% 6th 49% above peers
Troy, MI 94 (May 26) 4th -15.2% 7th 63% below peers
Temple, TX 301 (Jan 25) 11th -13.3% 8th 18% above peers
Citrus Heights, CA 357 (May 26) 13th -9.1% 9th 40% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 646 (May 26) 18th -3.2% 10th 153% above peers
Lawrence, MA 402 (May 26) 15th -0.8% 11th 57% above peers
Ogden, UT 470 (May 26) 17th +1.5% 12th 84% above peers
Westminster, CA 412 (May 26) 16th +4.2% 13th 61% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 846 (May 26) 19th +5.3% 14th 231% above peers
Manteca, CA 318 (May 26) 12th +12.8% 15th 24% above peers
Duluth, MN 256 (May 26) 10th +14.7% 16th on par with peers
Franklin, TN 188 (May 26) 8th +25.0% 17th 27% below peers
Nashua, NH 155 (Jan 25) 7th +25.4% 18th 39% below peers
Newton, MA 78 (Dec 25) 2nd +61.4% 19th 69% below peers

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Because this metric moves monthly, each listed city also held or improved over its own most recent 12 months (shown on each row), and the list is ordered by that recent movement. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Ames, IA down about 18% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 11% a year · 2021-2026
  • Little Elm, TX down about 16% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 6% a year · 2021-2026
  • Cedar Park, TX down about 14% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 7% a year · 2021-2026
Public Safety

Property crime rate

▼ Lower is better Improving recently
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Property crime fell about 15% over the 12 months ending December 2025, faster than 56% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: property crime rose about 1% a year from 2020 to 2025. That is movement in the wrong direction.
Longer view: property crime fell about 1% a year from 2018 to 2025.
Most recent monthly reading: 504 in December 2025, down from 593 a year earlier.
504 per 100k
2018December 2025
Compare all 19 similar-size cities by change rank
Each place's latest 12 months compares against its prior 12. significant improvement · significant worsening · within chance fluctuation for counts this size (Poisson test at 90%; these are administrative tallies, so the test covers event randomness, not survey error).
Place Latestper 100k Today's rank Changelast 12 months Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
U.S. (RTCI sample) ref 1,987 (Apr 26) -12.2%
Danbury, CT 885 (May 26) 4th -30.7% 1st 48% below peers
Franklin, TN 677 (May 26) 2nd -25.0% 2nd 60% below peers
Clifton, NJ 1,700 (May 26) 10th -23.2% 3rd on par with peers
Lawrence, MA 803 (May 26) 3rd -21.9% 4th 53% below peers
Santa Fe, NM 3,809 (May 26) 18th -19.9% 5th 124% above peers
Westminster, CA 2,047 (May 26) 12th -19.4% 6th 20% above peers
Troy, MI 930 (May 26) 5th -17.9% 7th 45% below peers
Mission, TX 1,083 (May 26) 6th -16.6% 8th 36% below peers
Newton, MA 504 (Dec 25) 1st -15.0% 9th 70% below peers
Santa Monica, CA 3,848 (May 26) 19th -14.5% 10th 126% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 3,123 (May 26) 17th -12.7% 11th 84% above peers
Citrus Heights, CA 1,810 (May 26) 11th -8.8% 12th 6% above peers
Ogden, UT 1,685 (May 26) 9th -5.2% 13th 1% below peers
Champaign, IL 2,092 (May 26) 13th -3.8% 14th 23% above peers
Duluth, MN 2,872 (May 26) 15th -3.5% 15th 69% above peers
Bloomington, MN 2,896 (May 26) 16th -2.2% 16th 70% above peers
Manteca, CA 1,415 (May 26) 8th +11.0% 17th 17% below peers
Nashua, NH 1,267 (Jan 25) 7th +12.8% 18th 25% below peers
Temple, TX 2,203 (Jan 25) 14th +17.0% 19th 30% above peers

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Because this metric moves monthly, each listed city also held or improved over its own most recent 12 months (shown on each row), and the list is ordered by that recent movement. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Roswell, GA down about 31% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 11% a year · 2021-2026
  • Laguna Niguel, CA down about 25% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 7% a year · 2021-2026
  • Kenosha, WI down about 20% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 8% a year · 2021-2026
Public Safety

Homicide rate

▼ Lower is better Flat
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Homicide was essentially flat from 2020 to 2025.

Most recent monthly reading: 0 in December 2025, unchanged from 0 a year earlier.
0 per 100k
2018Apr 2026
Compare all 19 similar-size cities by change rank
Each place's latest 12 months compares against its prior 12. significant improvement · significant worsening · within chance fluctuation for counts this size (Poisson test at 90%; these are administrative tallies, so the test covers event randomness, not survey error).
Place Latestper 100k Today's rank Changelast 12 months Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
U.S. (RTCI sample) ref 6 (Apr 26) -17.8%
Clifton, NJ 0 (May 26) 1st -100.0% 1st 100% below peers
Bloomington, MN 0 (May 26) 2nd -100.0% 2nd 100% below peers
Troy, MI 0 (May 26) 3rd -100.0% 3rd 100% below peers
Danbury, CT 0 (May 26) 4th -100.0% 4th 100% below peers
Nashua, NH 0 (Jan 25) 5th -100.0% 5th 100% below peers
Franklin, TN 1 (May 26) 8th -66.6% 6th 3% below peers
Citrus Heights, CA 1 (May 26) 10th -50.2% 7th on par with peers
Santa Monica, CA 4 (May 26) 13th -50.1% 8th 285% above peers
Mission, TX 1 (May 26) 9th -50.0% 9th 3% below peers
Westminster, CA 2 (May 26) 11th -33.3% 10th 95% above peers
Lawrence, MA 4 (May 26) 14th -20.1% 11th 290% above peers
Duluth, MN 6 (May 26) 15th -16.6% 12th 392% above peers
Manteca, CA 1 (May 26) 7th +0.0% 13th 10% below peers
Fort Smith, AR 4 (May 26) 12th +0.0% 14th 283% above peers
Champaign, IL 6 (May 26) 16th +0.0% 15th 462% above peers
Santa Fe, NM 9 (May 26) 18th +14.3% 16th 663% above peers
Temple, TX 11 (Jan 25) 19th +83.3% 17th 857% above peers
Ogden, UT 8 (May 26) 17th +133.5% 18th 584% above peers
Newton, MA 0 (Dec 25) 6th 100% below peers

Peers worth a call

1
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Because this metric moves monthly, each listed city also held or improved over its own most recent 12 months (shown on each row), and the list is ordered by that recent movement. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
Public Safety

Motor vehicle theft rate

▼ Lower is better Improving recently, leading peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Vehicle theft fell about 32% over the 12 months ending December 2025, faster than 83% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: vehicle theft rose about 23% a year from 2020 to 2025. That is movement in the wrong direction.
Longer view: vehicle theft rose about 9% a year from 2018 to 2025.
Most recent monthly reading: 23 in December 2025, down from 34 a year earlier.
23 per 100k
2018December 2025
Compare all 19 similar-size cities by change rank
Each place's latest 12 months compares against its prior 12. significant improvement · significant worsening · within chance fluctuation for counts this size (Poisson test at 90%; these are administrative tallies, so the test covers event randomness, not survey error).
Place Latestper 100k Today's rank Changelast 12 months Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
U.S. (RTCI sample) ref 303 (Apr 26) -22.2%
Santa Fe, NM 320 (May 26) 17th -49.9% 1st 114% above peers
Mission, TX 26 (May 26) 2nd -42.5% 2nd 83% below peers
Danbury, CT 74 (May 26) 5th -33.3% 3rd 51% below peers
Newton, MA 23 (Dec 25) 1st -32.3% 4th 85% below peers
Clifton, NJ 163 (May 26) 12th -30.0% 5th 9% above peers
Champaign, IL 152 (May 26) 11th -29.5% 6th 2% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 375 (May 26) 19th -29.3% 7th 151% above peers
Lawrence, MA 76 (May 26) 6th -27.7% 8th 49% below peers
Fort Smith, AR 227 (May 26) 14th -24.3% 9th 52% above peers
Bloomington, MN 110 (May 26) 9th -23.0% 10th 26% below peers
Duluth, MN 102 (May 26) 8th -22.4% 11th 32% below peers
Franklin, TN 54 (May 26) 3rd -15.5% 12th 64% below peers
Troy, MI 62 (May 26) 4th -12.5% 13th 58% below peers
Citrus Heights, CA 176 (May 26) 13th -11.0% 14th 18% above peers
Ogden, UT 149 (May 26) 10th -8.3% 15th on par with peers
Temple, TX 321 (Jan 25) 18th -1.2% 16th 115% above peers
Westminster, CA 250 (May 26) 16th +0.0% 17th 67% above peers
Manteca, CA 239 (May 26) 15th +6.9% 18th 60% above peers
Nashua, NH 86 (Jan 25) 7th +36.2% 19th 43% below peers

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Because this metric moves monthly, each listed city also held or improved over its own most recent 12 months (shown on each row), and the list is ordered by that recent movement. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Laguna Niguel, CA down about 51% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 10% a year · 2021-2026
  • Mission, TX down about 42% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 20% a year · 2023-2026
  • Eden Prairie, MN down about 41% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 16% a year · 2021-2026
See all Public Safety data →
Economy
Economy

Median household income

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Household income rose about 26% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from $151,068 to $190,304 (each survey's own dollars, not adjusted for inflation) - more than the combined survey margin (±$9,081). 30 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the stronger third of similar-size cities and kept improving; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 30 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: household income rose about 60% from 2014 to 2024 ($118,639 to $190,304).
$190,304
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Massachusetts ref $103,960 +28%
United States ref $80,734 +28%
Trenton, NJ $52,537 31st +48% 1st 29% below peers
Hemet, CA $57,719 27th +45% 2nd 21% below peers
Ogden, UT $72,575 17th +45% 3rd 1% below peers
Waukegan, IL $71,919 18th +44% 4th 2% below peers
South Gate, CA $74,571 15th +43% 5th 1% above peers
Springdale, AR $69,787 19th +39% 6th 5% below peers
Santa Barbara, CA $106,182 6th +39% 7th 45% above peers
Melbourne, FL $66,991 22nd +38% 8th 9% below peers
Westminster, CA $85,541 12th +37% 9th 16% above peers
Lawrence, MA $60,433 24th +35% 10th 18% below peers
Manteca, CA $97,055 9th +33% 11th 32% above peers
Citrus Heights, CA $82,314 14th +32% 12th 12% above peers
Fort Smith, AR $54,816 29th +31% 13th 25% below peers
Duluth, MN $68,807 20th +31% 14th 6% below peers
San Leandro, CA $101,420 7th +30% 15th 38% above peers
Bryan, TX $59,289 26th +30% 16th 19% below peers
Nashua, NH $96,326 10th +28% 17th 31% above peers
Clifton, NJ $98,237 8th +28% 18th 34% above peers
Santa Fe, NM $73,482 16th +27% 19th on par with peers
Newton, MA $190,304 1st +26% 20th 159% above peers
Mission, TX $60,767 23rd +24% 21st 17% below peers
Germantown, MD $117,546 4th +24% 22nd 60% above peers
Temple, TX $68,204 21st +24% 23rd 7% below peers
Deerfield Beach, FL $59,730 25th +24% 24th 19% below peers
Bloomington, MN $93,211 11th +24% 25th 27% above peers
Franklin, TN $119,528 3rd +22% 26th 63% above peers
Santa Monica, CA $114,885 5th +19% 27th 56% above peers
Troy, MI $120,045 2nd +18% 28th 63% above peers
Champaign, IL $56,118 28th +16% 29th 24% below peers
Lawton, OK $54,433 30th +14% 30th 26% below peers
Danbury, CT $83,393 13th +14% 31st 13% above peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyMedian household income
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Palo Alto, CA up about 46% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 95% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Dublin, CA up about 43% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 92% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Bentonville, AR up about 40% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 88% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±$8,593 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Unemployment rate

▼ Lower is better Worsening, faster than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Unemployment rose about 0.5 percentage points a year from 2022 to 2025. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening faster than 90% of similar-size cities over 2022-2025.
Longer view: unemployment rose less than 0.1 percentage points a year from 2015 to 2025.
Most recent monthly reading: 3.7% in May 2026, down from 4.2% a year earlier.
3.7%
1990May 2026
Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Massachusetts ref 4.5% (May 26) +0.1pp
United States ref 4.2% (Jun 26) +0.1pp
Trenton, NJ 6.3% (May 26) 29th -1.5pp 1st 57% above peers
Clifton, NJ 4.0% (May 26) 12th -0.9pp 2nd on par with peers
Westminster, CA 3.8% (May 26) 8th -0.7pp 3rd 5% below peers
Citrus Heights, CA 4.0% (May 26) 13th -0.6pp 4th on par with peers
Newton, MA 3.7% (May 26) 6th -0.5pp 5th 7% below peers
San Leandro, CA 4.0% (May 26) 14th -0.5pp 6th on par with peers
Hemet, CA 6.3% (May 26) 30th -0.4pp 7th 57% above peers
South Gate, CA 4.6% (May 26) 22nd -0.4pp 8th 15% above peers
Lawrence, MA 5.9% (May 26) 28th -0.4pp 9th 48% above peers
Manteca, CA 5.1% (May 26) 24th -0.3pp 10th 27% above peers
Nashua, NH 3.2% (May 26) 4th -0.3pp 11th 20% below peers
Santa Barbara, CA 2.7% (May 26) 2nd -0.2pp 12th 32% below peers
Santa Monica, CA 5.4% (May 26) 27th -0.2pp 13th 35% above peers
Franklin, TN 2.5% (May 26) 1st -0.1pp 14th 38% below peers
Mission, TX 5.3% (May 26) 26th +0.0pp 15th 32% above peers
Ogden, UT 3.8% (May 26) 9th +0.1pp 16th 5% below peers
Fort Smith, AR 3.7% (May 26) 7th +0.1pp 17th 7% below peers
Springdale, AR 3.0% (May 26) 3rd +0.1pp 18th 25% below peers
Bryan, TX 3.5% (May 26) 5th +0.2pp 19th 12% below peers
Bloomington, MN 4.0% (May 26) 15th +0.4pp 20th on par with peers
Temple, TX 4.3% (May 26) 18th +0.4pp 21st 7% above peers
Waukegan, IL 4.4% (May 26) 20th +0.4pp 22nd 10% above peers
Santa Fe, NM 3.8% (May 26) 10th +0.6pp 23rd 5% below peers
Champaign, IL 4.0% (May 26) 16th +0.6pp 24th on par with peers
Troy, MI 3.9% (May 26) 11th +0.7pp 25th 3% below peers
Duluth, MN 4.2% (May 26) 17th +0.8pp 26th 5% above peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 4.3% (May 26) 19th +1.0pp 27th 7% above peers
Danbury, CT 4.5% (May 26) 21st +1.0pp 28th 12% above peers
Melbourne, FL 4.7% (May 26) 23rd +1.1pp 29th 18% above peers
Lawton, OK 5.2% (May 26) 25th +1.6pp 30th 30% above peers
Economy

Share of people below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Poverty changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (4.0% then, 4.2% now; margin ±1.0pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 10 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: poverty fell 0.9 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (5.1% to 4.2%).
4.2%
20112024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Massachusetts ref 9.6% -0.3pp
United States ref 12.0%
Franklin, TN 4.6% 2nd -2.0pp 1st 65% below peers
Hemet, CA 14.8% 19th -6.2pp 2nd 11% above peers
South Gate, CA 12.7% 13th -4.4pp 3rd 5% below peers
Citrus Heights, CA 8.5% 7th -2.9pp 4th 36% below peers
Trenton, NJ 20.9% 29th -6.8pp 5th 56% above peers
Springdale, AR 13.2% 15th -4.2pp 6th 1% below peers
Ogden, UT 13.3% 16th -3.5pp 7th on par with peers
Clifton, NJ 7.9% 5th -1.8pp 8th 41% below peers
Lawrence, MA 17.4% 25th -3.6pp 9th 31% above peers
Manteca, CA 9.5% 10th -1.9pp 10th 29% below peers
Nashua, NH 7.7% 4th -1.4pp 11th 42% below peers
San Leandro, CA 8.2% 6th -1.3pp 12th 38% below peers
Mission, TX 19.3% 28th -3.1pp 13th 45% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 18.0% 26th -2.7pp 14th 35% above peers
Waukegan, IL 15.0% 21st -2.2pp 15th 13% above peers
Westminster, CA 14.3% 18th -1.1pp 16th 7% above peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 14.8% 20th -1.1pp 17th 11% above peers
Duluth, MN 15.9% 24th -1.1pp 18th 20% above peers
Santa Fe, NM 12.7% 14th -0.6pp 19th 5% below peers
Melbourne, FL 15.1% 22nd -0.4pp 20th 14% above peers
Temple, TX 15.8% 23rd -0.1pp 21st 18% above peers
Bryan, TX 22.1% 30th +0.4pp 22nd 66% above peers
Champaign, IL 23.4% 31st +0.7pp 23rd 76% above peers
Danbury, CT 11.4% 12th +0.4pp 24th 15% below peers
Newton, MA 4.2% 1st +0.2pp 25th 68% below peers
Troy, MI 5.4% 3rd +0.3pp 26th 60% below peers
Santa Barbara, CA 13.9% 17th +1.5pp 27th 4% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 11.1% 11th +1.2pp 28th 17% below peers
Lawton, OK 18.9% 27th +2.4pp 29th 42% above peers
Bloomington, MN 9.1% 9th +1.7pp 30th 32% below peers
Germantown, MD 8.8% 8th +2.2pp 31st 34% below peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of people below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Apex, NC down 2.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Eagle Mountain, UT down 3.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Westfield, IN down 2.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.6pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Share of children below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Child poverty changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (2.8% then, 1.9% now; margin ±1.1pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 15 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: child poverty fell 4.7 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (6.5% to 1.9%).
1.9%
20132024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Massachusetts ref 11.7% -1.5pp
United States ref 16.1%
Franklin, TN 3.6% 2nd -4.6pp 1st 79% below peers
Clifton, NJ 7.4% 5th -7.8pp 2nd 56% below peers
Citrus Heights, CA 7.4% 6th -6.5pp 3rd 55% below peers
San Leandro, CA 7.0% 4th -5.7pp 4th 58% below peers
South Gate, CA 14.6% 12th -9.6pp 5th 12% below peers
Manteca, CA 9.1% 8th -5.7pp 6th 45% below peers
Hemet, CA 17.7% 19th -10.7pp 7th 6% above peers
Newton, MA 1.9% 1st -1.0pp 8th 89% below peers
Springdale, AR 18.2% 20th -8.7pp 9th 9% above peers
Trenton, NJ 26.3% 29th -12.2pp 10th 58% above peers
Troy, MI 3.6% 3rd -1.4pp 11th 78% below peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 16.7% 16th -6.5pp 12th on par with peers
Fort Smith, AR 22.6% 24th -7.5pp 13th 36% above peers
Mission, TX 24.7% 27th -7.2pp 14th 48% above peers
Nashua, NH 9.7% 9th -2.3pp 15th 42% below peers
Temple, TX 20.9% 23rd -3.3pp 16th 26% above peers
Westminster, CA 17.1% 18th -2.4pp 17th 3% above peers
Lawrence, MA 24.1% 25th -2.7pp 18th 45% above peers
Bryan, TX 29.6% 31st -3.3pp 19th 78% above peers
Ogden, UT 19.4% 22nd -1.9pp 20th 16% above peers
Champaign, IL 15.7% 14th -1.2pp 21st 6% below peers
Waukegan, IL 24.5% 26th -1.5pp 22nd 47% above peers
Santa Fe, NM 19.0% 21st -1.0pp 23rd 14% above peers
Danbury, CT 16.8% 17th -0.4pp 24th 1% above peers
Lawton, OK 28.7% 30th +2.3pp 25th 72% above peers
Melbourne, FL 25.9% 28th +3.3pp 26th 55% above peers
Duluth, MN 15.6% 13th +2.2pp 27th 6% below peers
Bloomington, MN 13.1% 10th +3.2pp 28th 22% below peers
Santa Barbara, CA 15.9% 15th +4.4pp 29th 4% below peers
Santa Monica, CA 7.7% 7th +2.4pp 30th 54% below peers
Germantown, MD 14.2% 11th +5.2pp 31st 15% below peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of children below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Westfield, IN down 6.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Catalina Foothills, AZ down 5.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Apex, NC down 4.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.7pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Households with a broadband internet subscription

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Broadband rose 3.1 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 93.8% to 96.9% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.6pp). 29 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the stronger third of similar-size cities and kept improving; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 29 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: broadband rose 5.4 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (91.5% to 96.9%).
96.9%
20172024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Massachusetts ref 92.9% +6.2pp
United States ref 91.1%
Trenton, NJ 82.0% 31st +18.1pp 1st 10% below peers
Springdale, AR 91.2% 18th +18.5pp 2nd on par with peers
Lawrence, MA 84.9% 30th +12.7pp 3rd 7% below peers
Mission, TX 90.5% 21st +12.6pp 4th 1% below peers
Hemet, CA 88.9% 26th +11.8pp 5th 3% below peers
Ogden, UT 93.9% 7th +12.4pp 6th 3% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 85.4% 29th +10.4pp 7th 7% below peers
Santa Fe, NM 91.9% 14th +9.7pp 8th 1% above peers
Temple, TX 90.6% 20th +8.9pp 9th 1% below peers
Duluth, MN 90.4% 23rd +8.8pp 10th 1% below peers
Bryan, TX 87.1% 28th +8.4pp 11th 5% below peers
Clifton, NJ 91.4% 16th +8.4pp 12th on par with peers
Champaign, IL 91.5% 15th +7.2pp 13th on par with peers
South Gate, CA 90.9% 19th +7.0pp 14th 1% below peers
Citrus Heights, CA 93.7% 8th +7.1pp 15th 2% above peers
Lawton, OK 90.3% 24th +6.5pp 16th 1% below peers
Melbourne, FL 90.4% 22nd +6.5pp 17th 1% below peers
Westminster, CA 93.6% 9th +6.6pp 18th 2% above peers
San Leandro, CA 93.5% 11th +6.4pp 19th 2% above peers
Waukegan, IL 90.1% 25th +6.1pp 20th 1% below peers
Santa Barbara, CA 94.0% 6th +5.8pp 21st 3% above peers
Manteca, CA 93.6% 10th +5.4pp 22nd 2% above peers
Bloomington, MN 92.8% 13th +5.1pp 23rd 2% above peers
Danbury, CT 91.3% 17th +4.5pp 24th on par with peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 87.4% 27th +4.2pp 25th 4% below peers
Nashua, NH 93.4% 12th +3.8pp 26th 2% above peers
Franklin, TN 96.0% 3rd +3.9pp 27th 5% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 94.2% 5th +3.0pp 28th 3% above peers
Newton, MA 96.9% 1st +3.1pp 29th 6% above peers
Germantown, MD 96.6% 2nd +2.5pp 30th 6% above peers
Troy, MI 96.0% 4th +2.4pp 31st 5% above peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds with a broadband internet subscription
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Wheaton, MD up 6.5pp between its surveys · a smaller real gain than 52% of this group · 2019-2024
  • South San Francisco, CA up 6.3pp between its surveys · a smaller real gain than 54% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Chino, CA up 6.0pp between its surveys · a smaller real gain than 56% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±2.5pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Income inequality (Gini index)

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Inequality changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (0.48 then, 0.49 now; margin ±0.02).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 6 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: inequality fell about 4% from 2014 to 2024 (0.51 to 0.49).
0.49
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Massachusetts ref 0.49 +0.006
United States ref 0.48 +0.001
Citrus Heights, CA 0.38 1st -0.022 1st 16% below peers
Ogden, UT 0.43 6th -0.024 2nd 5% below peers
Mission, TX 0.48 24th -0.021 3rd 5% above peers
Westminster, CA 0.47 18th -0.019 4th 3% above peers
Lawton, OK 0.44 9th -0.013 5th 4% below peers
Melbourne, FL 0.44 12th -0.013 6th 3% below peers
Temple, TX 0.45 14th -0.010 7th 1% below peers
Germantown, MD 0.40 2nd -0.009 8th 12% below peers
Lawrence, MA 0.46 17th -0.010 9th on par with peers
Santa Monica, CA 0.54 30th -0.007 10th 19% above peers
Nashua, NH 0.44 10th -0.001 11th 4% below peers
Santa Fe, NM 0.48 22nd +0.000 12th 5% above peers
Bryan, TX 0.47 20th +0.002 13th 3% above peers
Duluth, MN 0.48 23rd +0.002 14th 5% above peers
Waukegan, IL 0.44 11th +0.005 15th 3% below peers
Trenton, NJ 0.53 29th +0.009 16th 15% above peers
Manteca, CA 0.41 3rd +0.008 17th 9% below peers
Troy, MI 0.42 5th +0.009 18th 7% below peers
Franklin, TN 0.43 8th +0.009 19th 5% below peers
Bloomington, MN 0.43 7th +0.011 20th 5% below peers
Newton, MA 0.49 25th +0.012 21st 7% above peers
Springdale, AR 0.46 16th +0.012 22nd on par with peers
Champaign, IL 0.56 31st +0.015 23rd 23% above peers
Santa Barbara, CA 0.50 27th +0.019 24th 9% above peers
South Gate, CA 0.42 4th +0.018 25th 7% below peers
San Leandro, CA 0.45 13th +0.020 26th 1% below peers
Hemet, CA 0.47 21st +0.027 27th 4% above peers
Clifton, NJ 0.45 15th +0.027 28th on par with peers
Danbury, CT 0.47 19th +0.029 29th 3% above peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 0.49 26th +0.031 30th 8% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 0.52 28th +0.034 31st 14% above peers
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B19083) through 2024 ±0.01 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Households receiving SNAP

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

SNAP changed less than the survey can measure between the 2014-2018 and 2019-2023 surveys (4.2% then, 4.4% now; margin ±1.2pp).

Within the survey margin, 2014-2018 vs 2019-2023 surveys; 13 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: snap rose 0.7 percentage points from 2013 to 2023 (3.7% to 4.4%).
4.4%
20102023
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2019-2023 survey Today's rank Change2014-2018 → 2019-2023 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Massachusetts ref 13.8% +1.8pp
United States ref 11.8% -0.5pp
Springdale, AR 6.0% 5th -5.2pp 1st 48% below peers
Franklin, TN 2.5% 1st -1.4pp 2nd 78% below peers
Ogden, UT 11.6% 16th -4.4pp 3rd on par with peers
Nashua, NH 7.2% 7th -2.6pp 4th 37% below peers
Fort Smith, AR 13.2% 21st -3.6pp 5th 14% above peers
Manteca, CA 8.8% 9th -2.0pp 6th 24% below peers
Temple, TX 14.2% 22nd -2.3pp 7th 23% above peers
Duluth, MN 10.9% 13th -1.5pp 8th 5% below peers
Waukegan, IL 18.5% 25th -2.0pp 9th 60% above peers
Melbourne, FL 11.8% 17th -1.3pp 10th 2% above peers
Clifton, NJ 11.2% 14th -1.0pp 11th 3% below peers
Mission, TX 20.2% 28th -1.2pp 12th 75% above peers
Trenton, NJ 26.1% 30th -0.1pp 13th 126% above peers
Bryan, TX 13.1% 20th +0.1pp 14th 13% above peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 14.5% 23rd +0.4pp 15th 25% above peers
Champaign, IL 9.7% 11th +0.3pp 16th 16% below peers
Newton, MA 4.4% 2nd +0.2pp 17th 62% below peers
Bloomington, MN 5.9% 4th +0.2pp 18th 49% below peers
Germantown, MD 8.9% 10th +0.4pp 19th 23% below peers
Lawton, OK 18.7% 26th +1.0pp 20th 62% above peers
Lawrence, MA 43.9% 31st +3.1pp 21st 280% above peers
Santa Fe, NM 12.4% 19th +1.2pp 22nd 7% above peers
Hemet, CA 19.9% 27th +2.5pp 23rd 72% above peers
Danbury, CT 10.9% 12th +1.4pp 24th 6% below peers
Citrus Heights, CA 12.0% 18th +1.6pp 25th 4% above peers
Troy, MI 5.2% 3rd +0.9pp 26th 55% below peers
South Gate, CA 20.3% 29th +3.6pp 27th 75% above peers
Westminster, CA 14.5% 24th +2.8pp 28th 26% above peers
San Leandro, CA 11.3% 15th +2.8pp 29th 2% below peers
Santa Barbara, CA 7.3% 8th +2.5pp 30th 36% below peers
Santa Monica, CA 6.0% 6th +3.2pp 31st 48% below peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2018 to 2023, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds receiving SNAP
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Queen Creek, AZ down 2.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2018-2023
  • El Dorado Hills, CA down 1.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2018-2023
  • South Jordan, UT down 1.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2018-2023
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2023 ±0.9pp at 90% confidence (2023 estimate) survey trend: 2014-2018 vs 2019-2023 surveys about this metric
See all Economy data →
Housing
Housing

Typical home value

No better direction Rising recently
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Home value rose about 2% over the 12 months ending June 2026, faster than 50% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: home value rose about 6% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 73% of similar-size cities.
Longer view: home value rose about 7% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: $1,564,706 in June 2026, up from $1,534,774 a year earlier.
$1,564,706
2000June 2026
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Massachusetts ref $672,867 (Jun 26) +1.8%
United States ref $372,995 (Jun 26) +0.8%
Waukegan, IL $247,565 (Jun 26) 27th +7.0% 1st 44% below peers
Duluth, MN $303,635 (Jun 26) 23rd +6.2% 2nd 32% below peers
Lawton, OK $142,204 (Jun 26) 31st +5.6% 3rd 68% below peers
Champaign, IL $241,516 (Jun 26) 28th +4.9% 4th 46% below peers
Springdale, AR $342,727 (Jun 26) 22nd +3.9% 5th 23% below peers
Danbury, CT $496,969 (Jun 26) 13th +3.8% 6th 11% above peers
Clifton, NJ $616,096 (Jun 26) 8th +3.6% 7th 38% above peers
Fort Smith, AR $197,471 (Jun 26) 30th +3.5% 8th 56% below peers
Nashua, NH $517,357 (Jun 26) 12th +3.3% 9th 16% above peers
Westminster, CA $1,104,016 (Jun 26) 4th +3.3% 10th 148% above peers
Santa Barbara, CA $1,834,551 (Jun 26) 1st +3.0% 11th 311% above peers
Troy, MI $472,471 (Jun 26) 15th +2.6% 12th 6% above peers
South Gate, CA $701,329 (Jun 26) 7th +2.4% 13th 57% above peers
Bloomington, MN $370,580 (Jun 26) 19th +2.3% 14th 17% below peers
Lawrence, MA $521,895 (Jun 26) 11th +2.2% 15th 17% above peers
Newton, MA $1,564,706 (Jun 26) 3rd +2.0% 16th 251% above peers
Franklin, TN $928,567 (Jun 26) 5th +1.4% 17th 108% above peers
Bryan, TX $277,011 (Jun 26) 24th +0.9% 18th 38% below peers
Santa Monica, CA $1,698,037 (Jun 26) 2nd +0.8% 19th 281% above peers
Ogden, UT $401,774 (Jun 26) 18th +0.6% 20th 10% below peers
Santa Fe, NM $589,611 (Jun 26) 9th +0.3% 21st 32% above peers
Hemet, CA $445,921 (Jun 26) 16th -0.1% 22nd on par with peers
Mission, TX $221,111 (Jun 26) 29th -0.2% 23rd 50% below peers
Citrus Heights, CA $478,999 (Jun 26) 14th -1.4% 24th 7% above peers
Trenton, NJ $356,470 (Jun 26) 21st -1.9% 25th 20% below peers
Melbourne, FL $359,920 (Jun 26) 20th -2.2% 26th 19% below peers
Temple, TX $249,750 (Jun 26) 26th -2.8% 27th 44% below peers
Germantown, MD $425,701 (Jun 26) 17th -2.8% 28th 5% below peers
San Leandro, CA $815,011 (Jun 26) 6th -3.1% 29th 83% above peers
Manteca, CA $585,227 (Jun 26) 10th -4.2% 30th 31% above peers
Deerfield Beach, FL $272,664 (Jun 26) 25th -5.0% 31st 39% below peers
Housing

Starter home value (bottom tier)

No better direction Rising recently, faster than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Starter homes rose about 4% over the 12 months ending June 2026, faster than 70% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: starter homes rose about 6% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 60% of similar-size cities.
Longer view: starter homes rose about 6% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: $990,781 in June 2026, up from $957,124 a year earlier.
$990,781
2000June 2026
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Massachusetts ref $440,443 (Jun 26) +2.2%
United States ref $202,486 (Jun 26) +2.0%
Waukegan, IL $199,539 (Jun 26) 24th +9.9% 1st 41% below peers
Duluth, MN $204,230 (Jun 26) 23rd +8.0% 2nd 40% below peers
Champaign, IL $157,490 (Jun 26) 27th +6.8% 3rd 54% below peers
Lawton, OK $74,294 (Jun 26) 31st +5.6% 4th 78% below peers
Clifton, NJ $523,401 (Jun 26) 8th +5.2% 5th 54% above peers
Springdale, AR $263,332 (Jun 26) 20th +5.0% 6th 23% below peers
Fort Smith, AR $114,649 (Jun 26) 30th +4.5% 7th 66% below peers
Westminster, CA $934,008 (Jun 26) 4th +3.7% 8th 174% above peers
Nashua, NH $387,942 (Jun 26) 12th +3.5% 9th 14% above peers
Newton, MA $990,781 (Jun 26) 2nd +3.5% 10th 191% above peers
Danbury, CT $340,302 (Jun 26) 16th +3.5% 11th on par with peers
Troy, MI $342,306 (Jun 26) 15th +3.3% 12th 1% above peers
Lawrence, MA $379,426 (Jun 26) 13th +3.2% 13th 11% above peers
South Gate, CA $637,011 (Jun 26) 6th +3.0% 14th 87% above peers
Santa Barbara, CA $1,225,066 (Jun 26) 1st +2.9% 15th 260% above peers
Mission, TX $147,222 (Jun 26) 28th +2.5% 16th 57% below peers
Bloomington, MN $272,110 (Jun 26) 19th +2.2% 17th 20% below peers
Franklin, TN $609,863 (Jun 26) 7th +2.1% 18th 79% above peers
Bryan, TX $189,999 (Jun 26) 25th +1.1% 19th 44% below peers
Ogden, UT $322,385 (Jun 26) 17th +1.0% 20th 5% below peers
Santa Fe, NM $409,850 (Jun 26) 10th +0.9% 21st 20% above peers
Hemet, CA $345,970 (Jun 26) 14th -0.9% 22nd 2% above peers
Santa Monica, CA $956,112 (Jun 26) 3rd -1.2% 23rd 181% above peers
Citrus Heights, CA $400,283 (Jun 26) 11th -1.8% 24th 18% above peers
Trenton, NJ $208,402 (Jun 26) 22nd -2.5% 25th 39% below peers
Melbourne, FL $232,849 (Jun 26) 21st -2.5% 26th 32% below peers
San Leandro, CA $654,632 (Jun 26) 5th -2.9% 27th 92% above peers
Temple, TX $168,706 (Jun 26) 26th -3.5% 28th 50% below peers
Germantown, MD $311,886 (Jun 26) 18th -3.7% 29th 8% below peers
Manteca, CA $481,476 (Jun 26) 9th -4.0% 30th 41% above peers
Deerfield Beach, FL $124,254 (Jun 26) 29th -11.2% 31st 63% below peers
Housing

Homeownership rate

▲ Higher is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Homeownership fell 2.0 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 72.0% to 70.0% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.9pp). That reverses the previous span, which went up between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys. 2 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 12 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: homeownership rose 0.2 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (69.7% to 70.0%).
70.0%
20112024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Massachusetts ref 62.5% +0.1pp
United States ref 65.2%
Manteca, CA 72.4% 2nd +10.6pp 1st 25% above peers
Springdale, AR 53.4% 20th +4.0pp 2nd 8% below peers
Waukegan, IL 50.2% 24th +3.7pp 3rd 14% below peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 63.9% 7th +4.4pp 4th 10% above peers
Citrus Heights, CA 60.7% 12th +3.9pp 5th 5% above peers
Hemet, CA 62.3% 10th +3.8pp 6th 7% above peers
Germantown, MD 67.2% 5th +4.1pp 7th 16% above peers
Ogden, UT 61.3% 11th +3.5pp 8th 5% above peers
South Gate, CA 45.3% 25th +2.5pp 9th 22% below peers
Mission, TX 71.4% 3rd +3.7pp 10th 23% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 53.4% 21st +2.7pp 11th 8% below peers
Trenton, NJ 37.9% 29th +1.9pp 12th 35% below peers
Bryan, TX 50.9% 23rd +2.5pp 13th 12% below peers
San Leandro, CA 58.1% 16th +2.2pp 14th on par with peers
Champaign, IL 43.8% 27th +1.2pp 15th 25% below peers
Melbourne, FL 59.7% 13th +1.6pp 16th 3% above peers
Westminster, CA 53.4% 19th +1.4pp 17th 8% below peers
Clifton, NJ 59.6% 14th +1.6pp 18th 3% above peers
Nashua, NH 55.8% 17th +1.0pp 19th 4% below peers
Santa Fe, NM 63.6% 9th +0.9pp 20th 9% above peers
Lawton, OK 44.8% 26th -0.1pp 21st 23% below peers
Troy, MI 73.2% 1st -0.5pp 22nd 26% above peers
Duluth, MN 59.4% 15th -1.0pp 23rd 2% above peers
Santa Barbara, CA 39.9% 28th -0.8pp 24th 31% below peers
Bloomington, MN 65.8% 6th -1.5pp 25th 13% above peers
Newton, MA 70.0% 4th -2.0pp 26th 20% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 27.9% 31st -1.1pp 27th 52% below peers
Franklin, TN 63.8% 8th -2.6pp 28th 10% above peers
Temple, TX 52.3% 22nd -2.3pp 29th 10% below peers
Danbury, CT 53.8% 18th -4.3pp 30th 7% below peers
Lawrence, MA 28.1% 30th -3.0pp 31st 52% below peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHomeownership rate
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.3pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Housing

Typical asking rent

No better direction Rising recently, faster than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Rent rose about 4% over the 12 months ending June 2026, faster than 80% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: rent rose about 6% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 79% of similar-size cities.
Longer view: rent rose about 5% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: $3,685 in June 2026, up from $3,559 a year earlier.
$3,685
2015June 2026
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
United States ref $1,965 (Jun 26) +2.2%
South Gate, CA $2,002 (Jun 26) 15th +9.0% 1st 3% above peers
Champaign, IL $1,410 (Jun 26) 27th +5.7% 2nd 27% below peers
Fort Smith, AR $1,071 (Jun 26) 31st +5.2% 3rd 45% below peers
Lawton, OK $1,086 (Jun 26) 30th +5.1% 4th 44% below peers
Duluth, MN $1,458 (Jun 26) 24th +3.9% 5th 25% below peers
San Leandro, CA $2,468 (Jun 26) 7th +3.6% 6th 27% above peers
Newton, MA $3,685 (Jun 26) 2nd +3.5% 7th 90% above peers
Lawrence, MA $2,347 (Jun 26) 10th +3.1% 8th 21% above peers
Santa Barbara, CA $3,967 (Jun 26) 1st +3.1% 9th 105% above peers
Clifton, NJ $2,668 (Jun 26) 4th +2.7% 10th 38% above peers
Nashua, NH $2,216 (Jun 26) 11th +2.7% 11th 14% above peers
Waukegan, IL $1,648 (Jun 26) 22nd +2.3% 12th 15% below peers
Bloomington, MN $1,684 (Jun 26) 21st +2.2% 13th 13% below peers
Franklin, TN $2,132 (Jun 26) 14th +2.2% 14th 10% above peers
Citrus Heights, CA $1,931 (Jun 26) 18th +1.8% 15th on par with peers
Westminster, CA $2,629 (Jun 26) 5th +1.7% 16th 36% above peers
Trenton, NJ $2,139 (Jun 26) 12th +1.5% 17th 10% above peers
Santa Monica, CA $3,517 (Jun 26) 3rd +1.5% 18th 81% above peers
Springdale, AR $1,513 (Jun 26) 23rd +1.4% 19th 22% below peers
Troy, MI $1,861 (Jun 26) 20th +1.3% 20th 4% below peers
Danbury, CT $2,439 (Jun 26) 9th +1.1% 21st 26% above peers
Santa Fe, NM $1,932 (Jun 26) 17th +1.1% 22nd on par with peers
Deerfield Beach, FL $2,440 (Jun 26) 8th +0.7% 23rd 26% above peers
Bryan, TX $1,428 (Jun 26) 26th +0.5% 24th 26% below peers
Manteca, CA $2,624 (Jun 26) 6th +0.5% 25th 35% above peers
Hemet, CA $1,939 (Jun 26) 16th +0.2% 26th on par with peers
Ogden, UT $1,310 (Jun 26) 29th +0.1% 27th 32% below peers
Germantown, MD $2,137 (Jun 26) 13th +0.0% 28th 10% above peers
Melbourne, FL $1,862 (Jun 26) 19th -0.3% 29th 4% below peers
Temple, TX $1,428 (Jun 26) 25th -0.4% 30th 26% below peers
Mission, TX $1,341 (Jun 26) 28th -1.6% 31st 31% below peers
Housing

Housing cost-burdened households

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Cost burden changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (29.5% then, 30.5% now; margin ±2.8pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 8 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: cost burden fell 3.8 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (34.3% to 30.5%).
30.5%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Massachusetts ref 35.7% +0.6pp
United States ref 32.2% +0.4pp
Waukegan, IL 34.2% 13th -5.4pp 1st 10% below peers
Germantown, MD 29.9% 7th -4.0pp 2nd 21% below peers
South Gate, CA 45.1% 25th -5.8pp 3rd 19% above peers
Mission, TX 29.2% 5th -3.5pp 4th 23% below peers
Trenton, NJ 45.8% 27th -4.2pp 5th 20% above peers
Clifton, NJ 42.5% 23rd -2.0pp 6th 12% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 28.3% 3rd -0.8pp 7th 26% below peers
Santa Barbara, CA 45.3% 26th -0.6pp 8th 19% above peers
Hemet, CA 46.6% 28th -0.5pp 9th 23% above peers
Nashua, NH 33.8% 12th -0.3pp 10th 11% below peers
Springdale, AR 25.0% 2nd +0.2pp 11th 34% below peers
San Leandro, CA 41.7% 22nd +0.4pp 12th 10% above peers
Lawton, OK 32.1% 9th +0.4pp 13th 16% below peers
Citrus Heights, CA 40.5% 19th +0.6pp 14th 6% above peers
Danbury, CT 41.7% 21st +0.8pp 15th 10% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 42.5% 24th +1.0pp 16th 12% above peers
Lawrence, MA 54.2% 31st +1.4pp 17th 42% above peers
Westminster, CA 47.5% 29th +1.4pp 18th 25% above peers
Champaign, IL 38.0% 16th +1.2pp 19th on par with peers
Newton, MA 30.5% 8th +1.0pp 20th 20% below peers
Bryan, TX 39.5% 18th +1.3pp 21st 4% above peers
Duluth, MN 32.8% 10th +1.3pp 22nd 14% below peers
Manteca, CA 40.8% 20th +1.7pp 23rd 7% above peers
Santa Fe, NM 35.7% 15th +1.7pp 24th 6% below peers
Bloomington, MN 28.9% 4th +1.6pp 25th 24% below peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 48.2% 30th +2.9pp 26th 27% above peers
Troy, MI 20.9% 1st +1.7pp 27th 45% below peers
Melbourne, FL 38.5% 17th +3.4pp 28th 1% above peers
Ogden, UT 33.4% 11th +3.4pp 29th 12% below peers
Temple, TX 34.3% 14th +3.9pp 30th 10% below peers
Franklin, TN 29.7% 6th +5.4pp 31st 22% below peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHousing cost-burdened households
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Tinley Park, IL down 4.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 97% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Appleton, WI down 3.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 96% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Decatur, IL down 3.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 93% of this group · 2019-2024
Housing

Households without a vehicle

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

No vehicle changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (6.1% then, 6.4% now; margin ±1.5pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 7 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: no vehicle fell 0.2 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (6.6% to 6.4%).
6.4%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Massachusetts ref 11.7% -0.7pp
United States ref 8.3% -0.3pp
Springdale, AR 3.9% 3rd -1.9pp 1st 50% below peers
Citrus Heights, CA 4.1% 4th -1.1pp 2nd 48% below peers
Waukegan, IL 8.4% 19th -1.9pp 3rd 7% above peers
Manteca, CA 3.2% 2nd -0.7pp 4th 60% below peers
Lawrence, MA 20.3% 30th -3.9pp 5th 158% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 7.6% 14th -1.0pp 6th 3% below peers
Trenton, NJ 26.7% 31st -3.4pp 7th 240% above peers
Duluth, MN 10.2% 27th -1.2pp 8th 29% above peers
Temple, TX 6.7% 10th -0.8pp 9th 15% below peers
Santa Fe, NM 4.5% 5th -0.5pp 10th 43% below peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 9.4% 24th -0.6pp 11th 20% above peers
Clifton, NJ 10.0% 26th -0.5pp 12th 27% above peers
Santa Barbara, CA 7.9% 17th -0.3pp 13th 1% above peers
Melbourne, FL 8.7% 20th -0.3pp 14th 11% above peers
South Gate, CA 7.7% 15th -0.3pp 15th 2% below peers
Nashua, NH 7.9% 16th -0.0pp 16th on par with peers
Hemet, CA 9.0% 23rd -0.0pp 17th 15% above peers
Ogden, UT 8.9% 22nd +0.0pp 18th 13% above peers
Franklin, TN 3.1% 1st +0.0pp 19th 60% below peers
Bryan, TX 6.5% 9th +0.2pp 20th 17% below peers
Lawton, OK 9.9% 25th +0.4pp 21st 26% above peers
Newton, MA 6.4% 8th +0.3pp 22nd 18% below peers
Danbury, CT 8.4% 18th +0.5pp 23rd 6% above peers
Mission, TX 5.5% 7th +0.3pp 24th 30% below peers
Santa Monica, CA 11.4% 28th +0.9pp 25th 46% above peers
Westminster, CA 7.6% 13th +0.8pp 26th 4% below peers
Troy, MI 4.6% 6th +0.6pp 27th 42% below peers
Bloomington, MN 6.8% 11th +0.9pp 28th 14% below peers
Champaign, IL 16.7% 29th +3.6pp 29th 112% above peers
San Leandro, CA 8.9% 21st +1.9pp 30th 13% above peers
Germantown, MD 7.5% 12th +2.0pp 31st 5% below peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHouseholds without a vehicle
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Apopka, FL down 2.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Sandy, UT down 1.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Mount Pleasant, SC down 1.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B08201) through 2024 ±1.2pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Housing data →
Health
Health

People without health insurance

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (1.2% then, 1.3% now; margin ±0.4pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 14 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: uninsured fell 0.6 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (1.8% to 1.2%).
1.3%
20122024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Massachusetts ref 2.5% -0.1pp
United States ref 8.2% -0.4pp
Clifton, NJ 6.8% 14th -3.7pp 1st 14% below peers
Franklin, TN 4.6% 6th -1.5pp 2nd 41% below peers
Santa Fe, NM 9.9% 19th -3.1pp 3rd 25% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 3.5% 3rd -1.0pp 4th 56% below peers
Hemet, CA 7.0% 15th -1.8pp 5th 11% below peers
Melbourne, FL 9.7% 18th -2.4pp 6th 22% above peers
Santa Barbara, CA 8.2% 17th -1.8pp 7th 3% above peers
Lawrence, MA 5.5% 9th -1.2pp 8th 31% below peers
South Gate, CA 12.8% 22nd -2.3pp 9th 61% above peers
Lawton, OK 10.9% 20th -1.3pp 10th 38% above peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 16.7% 28th -1.8pp 11th 111% above peers
Danbury, CT 14.6% 25th -1.4pp 12th 84% above peers
Bryan, TX 16.4% 27th -1.4pp 13th 107% above peers
Westminster, CA 6.2% 11th -0.5pp 14th 21% below peers
Manteca, CA 4.2% 4th -0.3pp 15th 47% below peers
Mission, TX 26.4% 31st -1.3pp 16th 234% above peers
Germantown, MD 6.3% 12th -0.3pp 17th 20% below peers
San Leandro, CA 5.1% 7th -0.2pp 18th 36% below peers
Ogden, UT 13.4% 23rd -0.0pp 19th 69% above peers
Waukegan, IL 15.7% 26th -0.0pp 20th 98% above peers
Troy, MI 2.8% 2nd +0.0pp 21st 65% below peers
Trenton, NJ 17.2% 29th +0.2pp 22nd 117% above peers
Newton, MA 1.2% 1st +0.0pp 23rd 84% below peers
Fort Smith, AR 12.6% 21st +0.5pp 24th 59% above peers
Bloomington, MN 5.5% 10th +0.5pp 25th 30% below peers
Citrus Heights, CA 6.6% 13th +0.8pp 26th 16% below peers
Temple, TX 13.6% 24th +1.8pp 27th 72% above peers
Champaign, IL 5.3% 8th +0.8pp 28th 33% below peers
Springdale, AR 20.8% 30th +3.3pp 29th 163% above peers
Duluth, MN 4.5% 5th +0.9pp 30th 43% below peers
Nashua, NH 7.9% 16th +1.9pp 31st on par with peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthPeople without health insurance
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Mountain View, CA down 2.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Brookline, MA down 1.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Minnetonka, MN down 1.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.3pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Health

Adult obesity

▼ Lower is better Level only
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Adult obesity is about half the peer median.

20.4%
20202022
Compare all 31 similar-size cities best first
Place Latest Today's rank History Latest vs. peers
Massachusetts ref 28.8%
United States ref 33.4%
San Leandro, CA 20.3% 1st 40% below peers
Newton, MA 20.4% 2nd 40% below peers
Westminster, CA 22.9% 3rd 32% below peers
Santa Monica, CA 23.0% 4th 32% below peers
Santa Fe, NM 24.0% 5th 29% below peers
Troy, MI 24.9% 6th 27% below peers
Germantown, MD 25.0% 7th 26% below peers
Bloomington, MN 27.2% 8th 20% below peers
Danbury, CT 27.6% 9th 19% below peers
Clifton, NJ 28.5% 10th 16% below peers
Franklin, TN 28.8% 11th 15% below peers
Nashua, NH 31.0% 12th 9% below peers
Santa Barbara, CA 31.5% 13th 7% below peers
South Gate, CA 31.6% 14th 7% below peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 32.5% 15th 4% below peers
Manteca, CA 33.9% 16th on par with peers
Melbourne, FL 34.2% 17th 1% above peers
Champaign, IL 35.1% 18th 4% above peers
Citrus Heights, CA 35.6% 19th 5% above peers
Springdale, AR 37.0% 20th 9% above peers
Duluth, MN 37.3% 21st 10% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 37.4% 22nd 10% above peers
Ogden, UT 37.6% 23rd 11% above peers
Lawrence, MA 38.1% 24th 12% above peers
Hemet, CA 38.3% 25th 13% above peers
Waukegan, IL 38.4% 26th 13% above peers
Temple, TX 38.7% 27th 14% above peers
Bryan, TX 39.6% 28th 17% above peers
Trenton, NJ 42.6% 29th 26% above peers
Lawton, OK 44.5% 30th 31% above peers
Mission, TX 44.7% 31st 32% above peers
CDC PLACES through 2022 modeled tract map about this metric
Health

Children without health insurance

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Child uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (0.5% then, 0.9% now; margin ±0.6pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 9 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: child uninsured rose 0.4 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (0.5% to 0.9%).
0.9%
20122024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Massachusetts ref 1.6% +0.3pp
United States ref 5.5% +0.4pp
Franklin, TN 1.6% 3rd -2.0pp 1st 70% below peers
Santa Fe, NM 5.4% 18th -5.2pp 2nd 5% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 2.2% 6th -2.0pp 3rd 57% below peers
Lawrence, MA 1.7% 4th -1.4pp 4th 66% below peers
Hemet, CA 4.4% 15th -2.3pp 5th 15% below peers
South Gate, CA 4.2% 14th -2.1pp 6th 20% below peers
Clifton, NJ 3.8% 13th -1.0pp 7th 27% below peers
Bloomington, MN 5.4% 17th -1.2pp 8th 4% above peers
Santa Barbara, CA 5.2% 16th -0.9pp 9th on par with peers
Germantown, MD 2.5% 9th -0.4pp 10th 51% below peers
Bryan, TX 10.0% 27th -1.2pp 11th 94% above peers
Manteca, CA 1.4% 2nd -0.1pp 12th 74% below peers
Waukegan, IL 5.8% 19th -0.3pp 13th 12% above peers
Ogden, UT 9.0% 24th -0.2pp 14th 74% above peers
Springdale, AR 13.1% 29th -0.3pp 15th 154% above peers
Citrus Heights, CA 2.0% 5th +0.0pp 16th 61% below peers
Danbury, CT 11.3% 28th +0.2pp 17th 119% above peers
Westminster, CA 3.1% 12th +0.3pp 18th 39% below peers
Champaign, IL 2.3% 8th +0.3pp 19th 56% below peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 13.6% 30th +2.4pp 20th 162% above peers
Mission, TX 19.2% 31st +3.6pp 21st 272% above peers
Duluth, MN 2.2% 7th +0.4pp 22nd 57% below peers
Troy, MI 2.8% 10th +0.5pp 23rd 47% below peers
Lawton, OK 7.9% 22nd +1.9pp 24th 53% above peers
San Leandro, CA 2.8% 11th +0.9pp 25th 46% below peers
Melbourne, FL 7.0% 21st +2.7pp 26th 35% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 9.9% 26th +4.0pp 27th 92% above peers
Temple, TX 8.4% 23rd +3.7pp 28th 63% above peers
Newton, MA 0.9% 1st +0.4pp 29th 83% below peers
Trenton, NJ 9.8% 25th +5.5pp 30th 90% above peers
Nashua, NH 6.8% 20th +5.1pp 31st 31% above peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthChildren without health insurance
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Newport Beach, CA down 1.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Royal Oak, MI down 1.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Troy, NY down 1.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 97% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B27001) through 2024 ±0.5pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Health data →
Education
Education

Adults with a bachelor's degree or higher

▲ Higher is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

College attainment changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (79.2% then, 81.1% now; margin ±3.2pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 19 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: college attainment rose 5.2 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (75.9% to 81.1%).
81.1%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Massachusetts ref 47.3% +3.6pp
United States ref 35.7% +3.5pp
Lawrence, MA 16.8% 28th +6.0pp 1st 45% below peers
Hemet, CA 15.5% 30th +4.4pp 2nd 49% below peers
Trenton, NJ 16.2% 29th +4.0pp 3rd 47% below peers
Manteca, CA 21.7% 26th +5.0pp 4th 29% below peers
Ogden, UT 25.9% 20th +5.1pp 5th 15% below peers
Melbourne, FL 34.7% 13th +6.2pp 6th 14% above peers
Waukegan, IL 20.9% 27th +3.5pp 7th 31% below peers
South Gate, CA 11.3% 31st +1.8pp 8th 63% below peers
Springdale, AR 24.2% 22nd +3.9pp 9th 21% below peers
Citrus Heights, CA 23.9% 23rd +3.6pp 10th 22% below peers
Duluth, MN 44.0% 10th +6.1pp 11th 44% above peers
Santa Fe, NM 47.8% 8th +6.1pp 12th 56% above peers
Nashua, NH 41.2% 11th +5.1pp 13th 35% above peers
Mission, TX 29.4% 18th +3.5pp 14th 4% below peers
Bryan, TX 30.1% 17th +3.5pp 15th 1% below peers
Bloomington, MN 46.2% 9th +4.2pp 16th 51% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 23.9% 24th +2.0pp 17th 22% below peers
Clifton, NJ 35.5% 12th +2.9pp 18th 16% above peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 28.8% 19th +2.1pp 19th 6% below peers
Danbury, CT 34.0% 14th +2.2pp 20th 11% above peers
Troy, MI 64.8% 3rd +4.0pp 21st 112% above peers
Champaign, IL 52.7% 5th +3.2pp 22nd 73% above peers
Lawton, OK 22.5% 25th +1.3pp 23rd 26% below peers
Temple, TX 30.6% 16th +1.7pp 24th on par with peers
Santa Barbara, CA 51.9% 6th +2.7pp 25th 70% above peers
San Leandro, CA 33.3% 15th +1.6pp 26th 9% above peers
Franklin, TN 64.5% 4th +3.0pp 27th 111% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 70.7% 2nd +2.8pp 28th 131% above peers
Newton, MA 81.1% 1st +2.0pp 29th 166% above peers
Germantown, MD 50.4% 7th +0.3pp 30th 65% above peers
Westminster, CA 25.9% 21st -1.2pp 31st 15% below peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationAdults with a bachelor's degree or higher
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Leander, TX up 12.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 95% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Grapevine, TX up 9.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 87% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Lakewood, OH up 8.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 85% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±2.5pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Education

Children ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool

▲ Higher is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Preschool enrollment fell 13.5 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 80.6% to 67.2% - more than the combined survey margin (±8.5pp). 10 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 13 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: preschool enrollment fell 9.8 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (76.9% to 67.2%).
67.2%
20112024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Massachusetts ref 55.4% -4.1pp
United States ref 45.5%
Bloomington, MN 59.5% 6th +23.0pp 1st 34% above peers
Duluth, MN 54.3% 11th +14.2pp 2nd 22% above peers
Danbury, CT 65.1% 4th +17.0pp 3rd 47% above peers
Bryan, TX 36.9% 24th +6.9pp 4th 17% below peers
Mission, TX 44.4% 16th +7.1pp 5th on par with peers
Temple, TX 40.2% 20th +5.7pp 6th 9% below peers
Champaign, IL 53.9% 12th +4.6pp 7th 21% above peers
Trenton, NJ 61.4% 5th +4.5pp 8th 38% above peers
Waukegan, IL 42.7% 18th +1.7pp 9th 4% below peers
Lawrence, MA 42.4% 19th +0.9pp 10th 4% below peers
Santa Fe, NM 58.1% 7th +1.0pp 11th 31% above peers
Germantown, MD 50.8% 13th -0.2pp 12th 15% above peers
Melbourne, FL 57.9% 8th -1.7pp 13th 30% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 43.5% 17th -1.9pp 14th 2% below peers
Franklin, TN 67.1% 3rd -4.4pp 15th 51% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 71.9% 1st -5.0pp 16th 62% above peers
Ogden, UT 29.4% 28th -5.2pp 17th 34% below peers
San Leandro, CA 50.6% 15th -10.0pp 18th 14% above peers
South Gate, CA 37.4% 23rd -7.4pp 19th 16% below peers
Newton, MA 67.2% 2nd -13.5pp 20th 51% above peers
Clifton, NJ 56.3% 9th -13.3pp 21st 27% above peers
Troy, MI 50.7% 14th -13.1pp 22nd 14% above peers
Santa Barbara, CA 55.4% 10th -14.6pp 23rd 25% above peers
Manteca, CA 31.2% 27th -12.5pp 24th 30% below peers
Lawton, OK 31.8% 26th -13.1pp 25th 28% below peers
Citrus Heights, CA 26.5% 30th -12.1pp 26th 40% below peers
Westminster, CA 38.8% 22nd -19.0pp 27th 13% below peers
Hemet, CA 22.6% 31st -11.4pp 28th 49% below peers
Springdale, AR 28.9% 29th -15.0pp 29th 35% below peers
Nashua, NH 39.2% 21st -20.5pp 30th 12% below peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 36.1% 25th -29.0pp 31st 19% below peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationChildren ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Vineland, NJ up 20.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 94% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Livermore, CA up 16.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 92% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Brookhaven, GA up 18.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 91% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±6.5pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Education

Teens not in school and not working

▼ Lower is better Turning down (early signal)
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Disconnected youth changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (1.4% then, 0.7% now; margin ±1.5pp). The newest releases lean downward: each of the last 4 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 3 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: disconnected youth fell 0.4 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (1.0% to 0.7%).
0.7%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Massachusetts ref 4.7% +0.6pp
United States ref 6.9% +0.3pp
Clifton, NJ 2.9% 4th -3.1pp 1st 63% below peers
Newton, MA 0.7% 1st -0.7pp 2nd 91% below peers
Hemet, CA 7.9% 16th -5.8pp 3rd on par with peers
Bloomington, MN 2.7% 3rd -1.9pp 4th 66% below peers
Lawrence, MA 11.4% 26th -4.0pp 5th 45% above peers
Mission, TX 8.8% 19th -1.0pp 6th 12% above peers
Nashua, NH 5.4% 9th -0.4pp 7th 32% below peers
Citrus Heights, CA 9.0% 20th -0.3pp 8th 14% above peers
Duluth, MN 4.1% 5th +0.2pp 9th 48% below peers
Springdale, AR 7.3% 15th +0.4pp 10th 8% below peers
Manteca, CA 8.0% 17th +0.4pp 11th 2% above peers
Troy, MI 2.6% 2nd +0.1pp 12th 67% below peers
South Gate, CA 9.4% 22nd +1.0pp 13th 19% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 13.7% 30th +2.1pp 14th 74% above peers
Trenton, NJ 13.6% 29th +3.0pp 15th 73% above peers
Ogden, UT 8.1% 18th +2.0pp 16th 3% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 4.8% 7th +1.4pp 17th 39% below peers
Santa Fe, NM 9.2% 21st +2.9pp 18th 16% above peers
Melbourne, FL 5.7% 10th +2.1pp 19th 28% below peers
Temple, TX 6.5% 14th +2.6pp 20th 18% below peers
Danbury, CT 5.1% 8th +2.1pp 21st 35% below peers
Waukegan, IL 11.0% 25th +4.9pp 22nd 40% above peers
Germantown, MD 4.4% 6th +2.0pp 23rd 45% below peers
Franklin, TN 5.9% 12th +2.7pp 24th 25% below peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 12.1% 27th +5.7pp 25th 54% above peers
Santa Barbara, CA 10.3% 23rd +5.0pp 26th 31% above peers
San Leandro, CA 10.9% 24th +5.9pp 27th 39% above peers
Westminster, CA 5.7% 11th +3.3pp 28th 27% below peers
Champaign, IL 6.4% 13th +3.7pp 29th 19% below peers
Lawton, OK 12.7% 28th +7.5pp 30th 62% above peers
Bryan, TX 15.6% 31st +10.5pp 31st 98% above peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationTeens not in school and not working
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B14005) through 2024 ±1.3pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys *Early signal: consecutive releases agree on direction only; the size of the newest movement is not measurable from overlapping surveys. about this metric
See all Education data →
Demographics
Demographics

Population

No better direction Rising
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Population rose about 1% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 88,593 to 89,044 - more than the combined survey margin (±82). 22 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.

Rising beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 29 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: population rose about 2% from 2014 to 2024 (86,945 to 89,044).
89,044
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Temple, TX 89,602 11th +20% 1st 1% above peers
Manteca, CA 89,043 15th +13% 2nd on par with peers
Franklin, TN 87,133 27th +12% 3rd 2% below peers
Lawrence, MA 88,736 17th +11% 4th on par with peers
Springdale, AR 88,160 19th +11% 5th 1% below peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 88,093 20th +10% 6th 1% below peers
Trenton, NJ 90,338 7th +8% 7th 1% above peers
Hemet, CA 91,326 2nd +8% 8th 3% above peers
Melbourne, FL 86,576 31st +6% 9th 3% below peers
Santa Fe, NM 89,019 16th +6% 10th on par with peers
Clifton, NJ 89,379 12th +5% 11th on par with peers
Troy, MI 87,898 22nd +5% 12th 1% below peers
Bryan, TX 87,939 21st +5% 13th 1% below peers
Mission, TX 87,038 29th +4% 14th 2% below peers
Bloomington, MN 88,665 18th +4% 15th on par with peers
Danbury, CT 87,263 26th +3% 16th 2% below peers
Nashua, NH 91,294 3rd +3% 17th 3% above peers
Champaign, IL 89,996 8th +3% 18th 1% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 89,805 10th +2% 19th 1% above peers
Waukegan, IL 89,076 13th +2% 20th on par with peers
Duluth, MN 87,093 28th +1% 21st 2% below peers
Ogden, UT 87,413 25th +1% 22nd 2% below peers
Newton, MA 89,044 14th +1% 23rd on par with peers
Germantown, MD 90,719 5th +0% 24th 2% above peers
Citrus Heights, CA 86,995 30th -0% 25th 2% below peers
Santa Monica, CA 91,169 4th -0% 26th 2% above peers
Westminster, CA 89,860 9th -1% 27th 1% above peers
San Leandro, CA 87,826 23rd -2% 28th 1% below peers
South Gate, CA 91,483 1st -3% 29th 3% above peers
Lawton, OK 90,595 6th -4% 30th 2% above peers
Santa Barbara, CA 87,779 24th -4% 31st 1% below peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsPopulation
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±48 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Children's share of the population

No better direction Falling
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Children fell 1.1 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 21.7% to 20.5% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.9pp). 9 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.

Falling beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 9 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: children fell 1.7 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (22.2% to 20.5%).
20.5%
20172024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Massachusetts ref 19.1% -0.8pp
United States ref 21.6% -0.7pp
Trenton, NJ 27.8% 3rd +1.3pp 1st 35% above peers
Santa Barbara, CA 17.7% 26th +0.8pp 2nd 14% below peers
Westminster, CA 20.5% 18th +0.4pp 3rd 1% below peers
Melbourne, FL 17.6% 27th +0.2pp 4th 15% below peers
Bloomington, MN 20.0% 20th +0.1pp 5th 3% below peers
Lawrence, MA 26.3% 5th +0.0pp 6th 28% above peers
Temple, TX 26.6% 4th -0.2pp 7th 29% above peers
Citrus Heights, CA 20.4% 19th -0.2pp 8th 1% below peers
Duluth, MN 17.6% 28th -0.2pp 9th 15% below peers
Clifton, NJ 19.7% 21st -0.2pp 10th 4% below peers
Fort Smith, AR 23.8% 7th -0.4pp 11th 15% above peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 17.8% 25th -0.3pp 12th 14% below peers
Danbury, CT 19.6% 22nd -0.5pp 13th 5% below peers
Lawton, OK 23.0% 11th -0.7pp 14th 12% above peers
Springdale, AR 29.8% 1st -0.9pp 15th 44% above peers
Champaign, IL 15.9% 30th -0.6pp 16th 23% below peers
Manteca, CA 25.2% 6th -1.0pp 17th 22% above peers
Troy, MI 20.6% 16th -0.9pp 18th on par with peers
Nashua, NH 18.6% 23rd -0.8pp 19th 10% below peers
Franklin, TN 23.4% 8th -1.2pp 20th 14% above peers
San Leandro, CA 18.1% 24th -1.0pp 21st 13% below peers
Newton, MA 20.5% 17th -1.1pp 22nd on par with peers
Bryan, TX 23.3% 9th -1.5pp 23rd 13% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 13.8% 31st -1.1pp 24th 33% below peers
Germantown, MD 23.0% 12th -2.8pp 25th 12% above peers
Hemet, CA 23.1% 10th -3.1pp 26th 12% above peers
Mission, TX 28.4% 2nd -4.3pp 27th 38% above peers
Ogden, UT 22.6% 14th -3.6pp 28th 10% above peers
Santa Fe, NM 15.9% 29th -2.9pp 29th 23% below peers
South Gate, CA 22.6% 15th -4.4pp 30th 10% above peers
Waukegan, IL 22.8% 13th -5.4pp 31st 11% above peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren's share of the population
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.7pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Children in single-parent families

No better direction Falling
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Single-parent fell 3.4 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 13.8% to 10.4% - more than the combined survey margin (±3.1pp). 2 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.

Falling beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 4 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: single-parent fell 5.8 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (16.2% to 10.4%).
10.4%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Massachusetts ref 28.6% +0.2pp
United States ref 29.9% -0.2pp
Santa Barbara, CA 38.3% 10th +6.8pp 1st 18% above peers
Santa Monica, CA 25.9% 24th +4.4pp 2nd 20% below peers
Hemet, CA 39.1% 7th +6.6pp 3rd 20% above peers
Manteca, CA 30.9% 19th +4.9pp 4th 5% below peers
Lawton, OK 47.3% 3rd +6.7pp 5th 45% above peers
Waukegan, IL 46.3% 4th +5.1pp 6th 42% above peers
Trenton, NJ 64.2% 1st +3.8pp 7th 97% above peers
Lawrence, MA 62.2% 2nd +3.5pp 8th 91% above peers
Troy, MI 11.4% 30th +0.6pp 9th 65% below peers
Champaign, IL 37.2% 12th +1.7pp 10th 14% above peers
Mission, TX 31.8% 17th +0.9pp 11th 2% below peers
Nashua, NH 30.4% 21st +0.8pp 12th 7% below peers
South Gate, CA 40.3% 5th +0.7pp 13th 24% above peers
Springdale, AR 32.8% 15th +0.5pp 14th 1% above peers
Temple, TX 34.6% 13th +0.5pp 15th 6% above peers
Danbury, CT 33.7% 14th +0.1pp 16th 3% above peers
Westminster, CA 23.2% 27th -0.1pp 17th 29% below peers
Bloomington, MN 24.9% 25th -0.2pp 18th 24% below peers
Germantown, MD 30.4% 20th -1.5pp 19th 7% below peers
Melbourne, FL 38.9% 8th -2.2pp 20th 20% above peers
Santa Fe, NM 38.8% 9th -2.8pp 21st 19% above peers
Citrus Heights, CA 27.6% 23rd -2.8pp 22nd 15% below peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 37.2% 11th -4.0pp 23rd 14% above peers
Duluth, MN 31.5% 18th -4.0pp 24th 3% below peers
Fort Smith, AR 32.6% 16th -4.7pp 25th on par with peers
San Leandro, CA 23.6% 26th -3.9pp 26th 27% below peers
Bryan, TX 39.3% 6th -7.2pp 27th 21% above peers
Ogden, UT 29.4% 22nd -6.8pp 28th 10% below peers
Franklin, TN 12.2% 29th -2.9pp 29th 63% below peers
Newton, MA 10.4% 31st -3.4pp 30th 68% below peers
Clifton, NJ 20.3% 28th -7.6pp 31st 38% below peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren in single-parent families
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B09002) through 2024 ±2.0pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Young children with all parents in the labor force

No better direction No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Working parents changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (78.2% then, 78.2% now; margin ±6.3pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 5 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: working parents rose 10.8 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (67.4% to 78.2%).
78.2%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Massachusetts ref 75.4% +1.9pp
United States ref 68.1% +1.9pp
Santa Monica, CA 86.6% 1st +21.8pp 1st 25% above peers
Santa Fe, NM 83.6% 2nd +16.3pp 2nd 21% above peers
Clifton, NJ 74.6% 9th +14.0pp 3rd 8% above peers
Franklin, TN 69.4% 15th +10.8pp 4th on par with peers
Manteca, CA 59.7% 29th +5.8pp 5th 14% below peers
Lawton, OK 61.0% 28th +5.0pp 6th 12% below peers
Nashua, NH 78.2% 5th +6.0pp 7th 13% above peers
Lawrence, MA 80.3% 3rd +5.3pp 8th 16% above peers
Trenton, NJ 69.3% 16th +4.4pp 9th on par with peers
Troy, MI 58.3% 31st +3.6pp 10th 16% below peers
Hemet, CA 64.3% 24th +3.6pp 11th 7% below peers
Mission, TX 62.8% 25th +3.4pp 12th 10% below peers
Waukegan, IL 74.9% 8th +3.5pp 13th 8% above peers
Ogden, UT 66.0% 22nd +2.9pp 14th 5% below peers
Temple, TX 61.5% 27th +2.4pp 15th 11% below peers
Bryan, TX 66.0% 21st +2.5pp 16th 5% below peers
Germantown, MD 75.7% 7th +2.7pp 17th 9% above peers
South Gate, CA 73.5% 11th +1.8pp 18th 6% above peers
Springdale, AR 64.4% 23rd +1.3pp 19th 7% below peers
Santa Barbara, CA 71.5% 12th +1.2pp 20th 3% above peers
Fort Smith, AR 66.9% 18th +0.7pp 21st 4% below peers
Newton, MA 78.2% 4th -0.0pp 22nd 13% above peers
Melbourne, FL 66.1% 20th -1.0pp 23rd 5% below peers
Champaign, IL 71.5% 13th -1.6pp 24th 3% above peers
Westminster, CA 62.7% 26th -1.8pp 25th 10% below peers
Duluth, MN 71.2% 14th -3.5pp 26th 3% above peers
Deerfield Beach, FL 69.0% 17th -3.4pp 27th 1% below peers
Danbury, CT 73.8% 10th -4.4pp 28th 6% above peers
Citrus Heights, CA 66.3% 19th -4.2pp 29th 4% below peers
Bloomington, MN 76.0% 6th -5.0pp 30th 10% above peers
San Leandro, CA 58.5% 30th -14.5pp 31st 16% below peers
Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsYoung children with all parents in the labor force
Loading tract map…
2 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B23008) through 2024 ±4.0pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Demographics data →