DataWorks Commons
Charlotte, NC
← All cities

Charlotte, NC

See all data for this place →
903,844 people (2024) 250k-1m South

Bright spots 8 indicators

Where Charlotte, NC shows a real improvement in recent years, or stands clearly ahead of its peers. How this is calculated →
Household income
Median household income
$82,068
2020-24
▲ 31%
relative change
$62,817 in 2019
Real improvement Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Violent crime
Violent crime rate
541 /100k
May 2026
▼ 17%
relative change
651 a year earlier
Real progress, still behind peers Trailing peers
Learn more ↓
SNAP
Households receiving SNAP
9.8%
2019-23
▼ 12%
relative change
11.2% in 2018
Real improvement Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Child poverty
Share of children below the poverty level
16.8%
2020-24
▼ 9%
relative change
18.6% in 2019
Real improvement Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Poverty
Share of people below the poverty level
11.5%
2020-24
▼ 9%
relative change
12.6% in 2019
Real improvement Leading peers
Learn more ↓
College attainment
Adults with a bachelor's degree or higher
48.0%
2020-24
▲ 8%
relative change
44.3% in 2019
Real improvement Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Broadband
Households with a broadband internet subscription
93.7%
2020-24
▲ 7%
relative change
87.5% in 2019
Real improvement Leading peers
Learn more ↓
No vehicle
Households without a vehicle
6.4%
2020-24
flat
relative change
6.4% in 2019
No measurable change Leading peers
Learn more ↓

What needs attention 8 indicators

Where Charlotte, NC shows a real worsening in recent years, or trails its peers clearly. How this is calculated →
Disconnected youth
Teens not in school and not working
8.6%
2020-24
▲ 47%
relative change
5.8% in 2019
Worsening Trailing peers
Learn more ↓
Child uninsured
Children without health insurance
8.7%
2020-24
▲ 36%
relative change
6.4% in 2019
Worsening Trailing peers
Learn more ↓
Preschool enrollment
Children ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool
42.5%
2020-24
▼ 11%
relative change
47.6% in 2019
Worsening Trailing peers
Learn more ↓
Property crime
Property crime rate
3,261 /100k
May 2026
▼ 9%
relative change
3,584 a year earlier
Behind peers, dropping too slowly Trailing peers
Learn more ↓
Cost burden
Housing cost-burdened households
34.9%
2020-24
▲ 6%
relative change
33.0% in 2019
Worsening Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Homeownership
Homeownership rate
51.0%
2020-24
▼ 4%
relative change
52.9% in 2019
Worsening  
Learn more ↓
Inequality
Income inequality (Gini index)
0.50
2020-24
▲ <1%
relative change
0.50 in 2019
No measurable change Trailing peers
Learn more ↓
Uninsured
People without health insurance
12.8%
2020-24
▲ 2%
relative change
12.5% in 2019
No measurable change Trailing peers
Learn more ↓

Big shifts 3 indicators

Real moves and big gaps, where neither direction is simply good or bad. Biggest relative change first; big-gap cards come last. How this is calculated →
Population
903,844
2020-24
▲ 5%
relative change
857,425 in 2019
Rising Among the lowest of peers
Learn more ↓
Children
Children's share of the population
22.7%
2020-24
▼ 4%
relative change
23.7% in 2019
Falling Among the highest of peers
Learn more ↓
Rent
Typical asking rent
$1,746
Jun 2026
flat
relative change
$1,742 a year earlier
Rising  
Learn more ↓

All indicators

Public Safety
Public Safety

Violent crime rate

▼ Lower is better Verified improver
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Violent crime fell about 17% over the 12 months ending May 2026, faster than 75% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: violent crime fell about 6% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 62% of similar-size cities. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
Longer view: violent crime rose less than 1%% a year from 2018 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: 541 in May 2026, down from 651 a year earlier.
541 per 100k
2018May 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 9 similar-size cities by change rank
Each place's latest 12 months compares against its prior 12. significant improvement · significant worsening · within chance fluctuation for counts this size (Poisson test at 90%; these are administrative tallies, so the test covers event randomness, not survey error).
Place Latestper 100k Today's rank Changelast 12 months Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
U.S. (RTCI sample) ref 456 (Apr 26) -9.3%
San Jose, CA 457 (May 26) 5th -20.5% 1st on par with peers
Fort Worth, TX 342 (May 26) 2nd -20.3% 2nd 25% below peers
Charlotte, NC 541 (May 26) 7th -16.9% 3rd 18% above peers
Columbus, OH 364 (Apr 26) 3rd -15.3% 4th 20% below peers
San Francisco, CA 468 (May 26) 6th -13.5% 5th 3% above peers
Indianapolis, IN 635 (May 26) 8th -12.2% 6th 39% above peers
Austin, TX 406 (May 26) 4th -9.9% 7th 11% below peers
Seattle, WA 648 (May 26) 9th +0.1% 8th 42% above peers
Jacksonville, FL 7 (May 26) 1st +14.2% 9th 98% below peers
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Because this metric moves monthly, each listed city also held or improved over its own most recent 12 months (shown on each row), and the list is ordered by that recent movement. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
Real-Time Crime Index through 2026-04 administrative trend: robust fit about this metric
Public Safety

Property crime rate

▼ Lower is better Improving recently, trailing peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Property crime fell about 9% over the 12 months ending May 2026, slower than 71% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: property crime rose about 5% a year from 2021 to 2026. That is movement in the wrong direction.
Longer view: property crime rose about 1% a year from 2018 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: 3,261 in May 2026, down from 3,584 a year earlier.
3,261 per 100k
2018May 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 8 similar-size cities by change rank
Each place's latest 12 months compares against its prior 12. significant improvement · significant worsening · within chance fluctuation for counts this size (Poisson test at 90%; these are administrative tallies, so the test covers event randomness, not survey error).
Place Latestper 100k Today's rank Changelast 12 months Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
U.S. (RTCI sample) ref 1,987 (Apr 26) -12.2%
San Francisco, CA 2,679 (May 26) 5th -21.6% 1st on par with peers
Fort Worth, TX 2,047 (May 26) 1st -20.2% 2nd 24% below peers
Indianapolis, IN 2,576 (May 26) 4th -15.6% 3rd 4% below peers
Austin, TX 2,921 (May 26) 6th -11.4% 4th 9% above peers
Columbus, OH 2,488 (Apr 26) 3rd -9.4% 5th 7% below peers
Charlotte, NC 3,261 (May 26) 7th -9.0% 6th 22% above peers
San Jose, CA 2,300 (May 26) 2nd -8.9% 7th 14% below peers
Seattle, WA 4,568 (May 26) 8th -7.8% 8th 71% above peers
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Because this metric moves monthly, each listed city also held or improved over its own most recent 12 months (shown on each row), and the list is ordered by that recent movement. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Plano, TX down about 17% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 8% a year · 2021-2026
  • Chandler, AZ down about 17% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 8% a year · 2021-2026
  • Madison, WI down about 6% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 4% a year · 2021-2026
Real-Time Crime Index through 2026-04 administrative trend: robust fit about this metric
Public Safety

Homicide rate

▼ Lower is better Improving recently
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Homicide fell about 1% over the 12 months ending May 2026, slower than 62% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: homicide fell about 4% a year from 2021 to 2026, slower than 75% of similar-size cities. The change does not yet pass the noise and consistency checks, so treat it as a raw signal.
Longer view: homicide rose about 2% a year from 2018 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: 9 in May 2026, down from 9 a year earlier.
9 per 100k
2018May 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 9 similar-size cities by change rank
Each place's latest 12 months compares against its prior 12. significant improvement · significant worsening · within chance fluctuation for counts this size (Poisson test at 90%; these are administrative tallies, so the test covers event randomness, not survey error).
Place Latestper 100k Today's rank Changelast 12 months Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
U.S. (RTCI sample) ref 6 (Apr 26) -17.8%
Seattle, WA 4 (May 26) 2nd -34.0% 1st 38% below peers
Columbus, OH 8 (Apr 26) 7th -28.2% 2nd 29% above peers
Fort Worth, TX 6 (May 26) 5th -23.2% 3rd on par with peers
Austin, TX 5 (May 26) 4th -18.5% 4th 19% below peers
Indianapolis, IN 14 (May 26) 9th -17.7% 5th 126% above peers
Charlotte, NC 9 (May 26) 8th -1.1% 6th 39% above peers
San Francisco, CA 4 (May 26) 3rd +0.0% 7th 34% below peers
San Jose, CA 2 (May 26) 1st +9.5% 8th 63% below peers
Jacksonville, FL 7 (May 26) 6th +14.2% 9th 15% above peers
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Because this metric moves monthly, each listed city also held or improved over its own most recent 12 months (shown on each row), and the list is ordered by that recent movement. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Glendale, AZ down about 56% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 10% a year · 2021-2026
  • Saint Paul, MN down about 24% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 11% a year · 2021-2026
  • Las Vegas, NV down about 17% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 17% a year · 2021-2026
Real-Time Crime Index through 2026-04 administrative trend: robust fit about this metric
Public Safety

Motor vehicle theft rate

▼ Lower is better Improving recently
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Vehicle theft fell about 22% over the 12 months ending May 2026, slower than 57% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: vehicle theft rose about 31% a year from 2021 to 2026. That is movement in the wrong direction.
Longer view: vehicle theft rose about 17% a year from 2018 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: 500 in May 2026, down from 641 a year earlier.
500 per 100k
2018May 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 8 similar-size cities by change rank
Each place's latest 12 months compares against its prior 12. significant improvement · significant worsening · within chance fluctuation for counts this size (Poisson test at 90%; these are administrative tallies, so the test covers event randomness, not survey error).
Place Latestper 100k Today's rank Changelast 12 months Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
U.S. (RTCI sample) ref 303 (Apr 26) -22.2%
San Francisco, CA 331 (May 26) 2nd -39.0% 1st 33% below peers
Fort Worth, TX 301 (May 26) 1st -35.0% 2nd 39% below peers
Austin, TX 380 (May 26) 3rd -26.8% 3rd 23% below peers
Indianapolis, IN 491 (May 26) 5th -24.2% 4th on par with peers
Charlotte, NC 500 (May 26) 6th -22.1% 5th 2% above peers
Seattle, WA 696 (May 26) 8th -15.9% 6th 42% above peers
San Jose, CA 488 (May 26) 4th -12.5% 7th 1% below peers
Columbus, OH 516 (Apr 26) 7th -7.7% 8th 5% above peers
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Because this metric moves monthly, each listed city also held or improved over its own most recent 12 months (shown on each row), and the list is ordered by that recent movement. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Boston, MA down about 39% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 8% a year · 2021-2026
  • Virginia Beach, VA down about 25% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 18% a year · 2021-2026
  • Chandler, AZ down about 20% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 12% a year · 2021-2026
Real-Time Crime Index through 2026-04 administrative trend: robust fit about this metric
See all Public Safety data →
Economy
Economy

Median household income

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Household income rose about 31% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from $62,817 to $82,068 (each survey's own dollars, not adjusted for inflation) - more than the combined survey margin (±$1,454). 8 of the 8 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started mid-pack and has reached a genuinely better level; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 8 of 8 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: household income rose about 54% from 2014 to 2024 ($53,274 to $82,068).
$82,068
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 9 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
North Carolina ref $72,388 +33%
United States ref $80,734 +28%
Indianapolis, IN $66,219 8th +38% 1st 19% below peers
Seattle, WA $123,860 3rd +34% 2nd 51% above peers
San Jose, CA $146,427 1st +34% 3rd 78% above peers
Austin, TX $93,658 4th +31% 4th 14% above peers
Charlotte, NC $82,068 5th +31% 5th on par with peers
Fort Worth, TX $79,507 6th +28% 6th 3% below peers
Jacksonville, FL $69,872 7th +28% 7th 15% below peers
San Francisco, CA $140,970 2nd +25% 8th 72% above peers
Columbus, OH $66,082 9th +23% 9th 19% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 240 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyMedian household income
Loading tract map…
99 of 240 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 3 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Stockton, CA up about 46% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Atlanta, GA up about 43% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 96% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Mesa, AZ up about 42% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 95% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±$1,299 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Unemployment rate

▼ Lower is better Worsening, slower than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Unemployment rose about 0.1 percentage points a year from 2022 to 2025. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening slower than 75% of similar-size cities over 2022-2025.
Longer view: unemployment fell about 0.1 percentage points a year from 2015 to 2025.
Most recent monthly reading: 3.6% in May 2026, down from 3.8% a year earlier.
3.6%
1990May 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 9 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
North Carolina ref 3.7% (May 26) -0.1pp
United States ref 4.2% (Jun 26) +0.1pp
Columbus, OH 2.8% (May 26) 1st -1.6pp 1st 20% below peers
San Francisco, CA 3.3% (May 26) 2nd -0.5pp 2nd 6% below peers
San Jose, CA 3.5% (May 26) 5th -0.5pp 3rd on par with peers
Indianapolis, IN 3.3% (May 26) 3rd -0.4pp 4th 6% below peers
Charlotte, NC 3.6% (May 26) 6th -0.2pp 5th 3% above peers
Fort Worth, TX 4.1% (May 26) 7th +0.3pp 6th 17% above peers
Austin, TX 3.4% (May 26) 4th +0.3pp 7th 3% below peers
Seattle, WA 4.5% (May 26) 8th +0.7pp 8th 29% above peers
Jacksonville, FL 4.7% (May 26) 9th +0.9pp 9th 34% above peers
BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics through 2025 administrative trend: robust fit about this metric
Economy

Share of people below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Poverty fell 1.2 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 12.6% to 11.5% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.7pp). 6 of the 8 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started mid-pack and has reached a genuinely better level; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 7 of 8 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: poverty fell 5.5 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (17.0% to 11.5%).
11.5%
20112024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 9 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
North Carolina ref 12.3% -1.7pp
United States ref 12.0%
Indianapolis, IN 15.5% 8th -2.1pp 1st 32% above peers
Seattle, WA 9.6% 2nd -1.1pp 2nd 18% below peers
Fort Worth, TX 12.9% 6th -1.4pp 3rd 10% above peers
Austin, TX 11.7% 5th -1.2pp 4th on par with peers
Charlotte, NC 11.5% 4th -1.2pp 5th 2% below peers
Columbus, OH 17.7% 9th -1.3pp 6th 51% above peers
San Jose, CA 8.0% 1st -0.6pp 7th 31% below peers
Jacksonville, FL 14.2% 7th -0.3pp 8th 21% above peers
San Francisco, CA 11.0% 3rd +0.8pp 9th 6% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 240 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of people below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
99 of 240 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Santa Ana, CA down 4.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Mesa, AZ down 4.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Durham, NC down 4.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.5pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Share of children below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Child poverty fell 1.7 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 18.6% to 16.8% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.1pp). 7 of the 8 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started mid-pack and has reached a genuinely better level; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 7 of 8 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: child poverty fell 7.3 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (24.2% to 16.8%).
16.8%
20132024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 9 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
North Carolina ref 17.7% -3.5pp
United States ref 16.1%
Indianapolis, IN 22.4% 8th -4.4pp 1st 33% above peers
Austin, TX 15.1% 4th -2.8pp 2nd 10% below peers
Seattle, WA 9.3% 3rd -1.6pp 3rd 45% below peers
San Jose, CA 8.2% 1st -1.2pp 4th 51% below peers
Fort Worth, TX 17.7% 6th -2.3pp 5th 5% above peers
Columbus, OH 26.0% 9th -3.3pp 6th 55% above peers
Jacksonville, FL 19.6% 7th -2.4pp 7th 16% above peers
Charlotte, NC 16.8% 5th -1.7pp 8th on par with peers
San Francisco, CA 9.0% 2nd -0.9pp 9th 46% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 240 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of children below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
98 of 240 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 4 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Mesa, AZ down 8.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Santa Ana, CA down 8.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Oakland, CA down 8.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 96% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.9pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Households with a broadband internet subscription

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Broadband rose 6.2 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 87.5% to 93.7% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.5pp). 8 of the 8 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started mid-pack and has reached a genuinely better level; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 8 of 8 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: broadband rose 10.3 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (83.4% to 93.7%).
93.7%
20172024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 9 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
North Carolina ref 90.2% +9.1pp
United States ref 91.1%
Indianapolis, IN 91.9% 8th +12.6pp 1st 2% below peers
Fort Worth, TX 92.3% 7th +8.0pp 2nd 1% below peers
Columbus, OH 93.6% 5th +7.6pp 3rd on par with peers
Jacksonville, FL 91.0% 9th +7.1pp 4th 3% below peers
Austin, TX 93.8% 3rd +6.2pp 5th on par with peers
Charlotte, NC 93.7% 4th +6.2pp 6th on par with peers
San Francisco, CA 93.1% 6th +5.3pp 7th 1% below peers
San Jose, CA 95.5% 1st +4.1pp 8th 2% above peers
Seattle, WA 94.5% 2nd +3.9pp 9th 1% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 240 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds with a broadband internet subscription
Loading tract map…
99 of 240 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Oklahoma City, OK up 9.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 68% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Oakland, CA up 8.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 66% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Long Beach, CA up 8.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 65% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.4pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Income inequality (Gini index)

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Inequality changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (0.50 then, 0.50 now; margin ±0.01).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 3 of 8 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: inequality fell about 1% from 2014 to 2024 (0.51 to 0.50).
0.50
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 9 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
North Carolina ref 0.48 +0.001
United States ref 0.48 +0.001
Indianapolis, IN 0.47 5th -0.018 1st on par with peers
Fort Worth, TX 0.45 2nd -0.005 2nd 3% below peers
Austin, TX 0.49 6th +0.002 3rd 4% above peers
Jacksonville, FL 0.47 4th +0.002 4th on par with peers
Columbus, OH 0.45 1st +0.003 5th 4% below peers
Seattle, WA 0.49 7th +0.004 6th 5% above peers
Charlotte, NC 0.50 8th +0.004 7th 7% above peers
San Francisco, CA 0.52 9th +0.012 8th 12% above peers
San Jose, CA 0.46 3rd +0.012 9th 1% below peers
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B19083) through 2024 ±0.01 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Households receiving SNAP

▼ Lower is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

SNAP fell 1.4 percentage points between the 2014-2018 and 2019-2023 surveys, from 11.2% to 9.8% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.6pp). 6 of the 8 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started mid-pack and has reached a genuinely better level; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2014-2018 vs 2019-2023 surveys; 8 of 8 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: snap fell 3.4 percentage points from 2013 to 2023 (13.2% to 9.8%).
9.8%
20102023
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 9 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2019-2023 survey Today's rank Change2014-2018 → 2019-2023 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
North Carolina ref 12.5% -0.6pp
United States ref 11.8% -0.5pp
Austin, TX 6.2% 1st -1.9pp 1st 37% below peers
Indianapolis, IN 12.4% 7th -2.5pp 2nd 27% above peers
Columbus, OH 12.8% 8th -2.5pp 3rd 31% above peers
Jacksonville, FL 14.6% 9th -2.2pp 4th 49% above peers
Fort Worth, TX 12.3% 6th -1.8pp 5th 26% above peers
Charlotte, NC 9.8% 5th -1.4pp 6th on par with peers
Seattle, WA 7.5% 2nd -1.0pp 7th 23% below peers
San Jose, CA 7.8% 3rd +1.3pp 8th 21% below peers
San Francisco, CA 9.7% 4th +5.0pp 9th 1% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 240 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2018 to 2023, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds receiving SNAP
Loading tract map…
99 of 240 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2023 ±0.4pp at 90% confidence (2023 estimate) survey trend: 2014-2018 vs 2019-2023 surveys about this metric
See all Economy data →
Housing
Housing

Typical home value

No better direction Falling recently, slower than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Home value fell about 1% over the 12 months ending June 2026, slower than 71% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: home value rose about 2% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 71% of similar-size cities.
Longer view: home value rose about 12% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: $399,434 in June 2026, down from $403,857 a year earlier.
$399,434
2000June 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 8 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
North Carolina ref $340,430 (Jun 26) -0.0%
United States ref $372,995 (Jun 26) +0.8%
San Francisco, CA $1,395,852 (Jun 26) 2nd +9.5% 1st 175% above peers
Columbus, OH $251,291 (Jun 26) 8th -0.9% 2nd 50% below peers
Charlotte, NC $399,434 (Jun 26) 5th -1.1% 3rd 21% below peers
San Jose, CA $1,413,804 (Jun 26) 1st -1.8% 4th 179% above peers
Jacksonville, FL $287,871 (Jun 26) 7th -1.8% 5th 43% below peers
Fort Worth, TX $300,035 (Jun 26) 6th -2.2% 6th 41% below peers
Seattle, WA $856,052 (Jun 26) 3rd -2.2% 7th 69% above peers
Austin, TX $507,622 (Jun 26) 4th -5.0% 8th on par with peers
Zillow Home Value Index through 2026-06 modeled trend: robust fit about this metric
Housing

Starter home value (bottom tier)

No better direction Falling recently, slower than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Starter homes fell about 1% over the 12 months ending June 2026, slower than 71% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: starter homes rose about 2% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 71% of similar-size cities.
Longer view: starter homes rose about 17% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: $291,086 in June 2026, down from $294,517 a year earlier.
$291,086
2000June 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 8 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
North Carolina ref $198,660 (Jun 26) +1.7%
United States ref $202,486 (Jun 26) +2.0%
San Francisco, CA $913,649 (Jun 26) 2nd +6.6% 1st 171% above peers
Columbus, OH $168,661 (Jun 26) 8th -0.9% 2nd 50% below peers
Charlotte, NC $291,086 (Jun 26) 5th -1.2% 3rd 14% below peers
Fort Worth, TX $211,166 (Jun 26) 6th -2.2% 4th 37% below peers
Seattle, WA $564,373 (Jun 26) 3rd -2.4% 5th 67% above peers
Jacksonville, FL $178,651 (Jun 26) 7th -2.9% 6th 47% below peers
San Jose, CA $928,894 (Jun 26) 1st -3.0% 7th 175% above peers
Austin, TX $337,472 (Jun 26) 4th -5.9% 8th on par with peers
Zillow Home Value Index through 2026-06 modeled trend: robust fit about this metric
Housing

Homeownership rate

▲ Higher is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Homeownership fell 1.9 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 52.9% to 51.0% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.8pp). 3 of the 8 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 5 of 8 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: homeownership fell 4.4 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (55.4% to 51.0%).
51.0%
20112024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 9 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
North Carolina ref 66.6% +1.4pp
United States ref 65.2%
Indianapolis, IN 56.0% 3rd +2.9pp 1st 10% above peers
Jacksonville, FL 57.6% 1st +1.5pp 2nd 13% above peers
San Francisco, CA 38.2% 9th +0.6pp 3rd 25% below peers
Fort Worth, TX 57.0% 2nd -0.4pp 4th 12% above peers
Columbus, OH 44.1% 6th -0.6pp 5th 13% below peers
San Jose, CA 55.8% 4th -1.0pp 6th 9% above peers
Charlotte, NC 51.0% 5th -1.9pp 7th on par with peers
Austin, TX 43.5% 8th -1.7pp 8th 15% below peers
Seattle, WA 43.7% 7th -2.0pp 9th 14% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 240 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHomeownership rate
Loading tract map…
99 of 240 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.7pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Housing

Typical asking rent

No better direction Rising
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Rent was essentially flat over the 12 months ending June 2026.

Multi-year view: rent rose about 2% a year from 2021 to 2026, slower than 57% of similar-size cities.
Longer view: rent rose about 7% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: $1,746 in June 2026, up from $1,742 a year earlier.
$1,746
2015June 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 8 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
United States ref $1,965 (Jun 26) +2.2%
San Francisco, CA $4,401 (Jun 26) 1st +20.4% 1st 152% above peers
San Jose, CA $3,479 (Jun 26) 2nd +5.3% 2nd 99% above peers
Columbus, OH $1,456 (Jun 26) 8th +1.1% 3rd 17% below peers
Jacksonville, FL $1,600 (Jun 26) 7th +1.0% 4th 8% below peers
Seattle, WA $2,224 (Jun 26) 3rd +0.4% 5th 27% above peers
Fort Worth, TX $1,635 (Jun 26) 5th +0.3% 6th 6% below peers
Charlotte, NC $1,746 (Jun 26) 4th +0.2% 7th on par with peers
Austin, TX $1,615 (Jun 26) 6th -2.0% 8th 8% below peers
Zillow Observed Rent Index through 2026-06 modeled trend: robust fit about this metric
Housing

Housing cost-burdened households

▼ Lower is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Cost burden rose 1.9 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 33.0% to 34.9% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.1pp). That reverses the previous span, which went down between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys. 4 of the 8 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 6 of 8 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: cost burden fell 2.0 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (37.0% to 34.9%).
34.9%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 9 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
North Carolina ref 28.8% -0.2pp
United States ref 32.2% +0.4pp
Indianapolis, IN 32.9% 1st -1.8pp 1st 8% below peers
San Jose, CA 37.5% 7th -1.0pp 2nd 5% above peers
Seattle, WA 34.5% 2nd -0.5pp 3rd 3% below peers
Austin, TX 37.2% 6th +1.0pp 4th 5% above peers
Columbus, OH 34.9% 3rd +1.6pp 5th 2% below peers
San Francisco, CA 35.6% 5th +1.7pp 6th on par with peers
Charlotte, NC 34.9% 4th +1.9pp 7th 2% below peers
Jacksonville, FL 37.7% 8th +3.1pp 8th 6% above peers
Fort Worth, TX 37.8% 9th +4.4pp 9th 6% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 240 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHousing cost-burdened households
Loading tract map…
99 of 240 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (tables B25070 + B25091) through 2024 ±0.8pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Housing

Households without a vehicle

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

No vehicle changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (6.4% then, 6.4% now; margin ±0.5pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 5 of 8 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: no vehicle fell 1.5 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (7.9% to 6.4%).
6.4%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 9 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
North Carolina ref 5.3% -0.5pp
United States ref 8.3% -0.3pp
Indianapolis, IN 8.4% 6th -0.9pp 1st 15% above peers
Jacksonville, FL 7.3% 5th -0.6pp 2nd on par with peers
Columbus, OH 8.5% 7th -0.4pp 3rd 16% above peers
San Francisco, CA 30.2% 9th -0.7pp 4th 313% above peers
Fort Worth, TX 5.5% 1st -0.0pp 5th 25% below peers
Charlotte, NC 6.4% 3rd +0.0pp 6th 12% below peers
Seattle, WA 19.0% 8th +1.2pp 7th 160% above peers
Austin, TX 7.1% 4th +0.9pp 8th 3% below peers
San Jose, CA 6.1% 2nd +0.9pp 9th 16% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 240 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHouseholds without a vehicle
Loading tract map…
99 of 240 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Fresno, CA down 2.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Stockton, CA down 2.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Glendale, AZ down 1.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 96% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B08201) through 2024 ±0.4pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Housing data →
Health
Health

People without health insurance

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (12.5% then, 12.8% now; margin ±0.4pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 6 of 8 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: uninsured fell 4.4 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (17.2% to 12.8%).
12.8%
20122024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 9 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
North Carolina ref 9.4% -0.9pp
United States ref 8.2% -0.4pp
Indianapolis, IN 8.7% 4th -1.6pp 1st 15% below peers
San Francisco, CA 3.3% 1st -0.4pp 2nd 68% below peers
Austin, TX 12.3% 7th -1.2pp 3rd 20% above peers
San Jose, CA 4.8% 3rd -0.4pp 4th 53% below peers
Jacksonville, FL 10.9% 6th -0.8pp 5th 7% above peers
Seattle, WA 4.2% 2nd +0.0pp 6th 60% below peers
Fort Worth, TX 18.4% 9th +0.2pp 7th 79% above peers
Charlotte, NC 12.8% 8th +0.3pp 8th 25% above peers
Columbus, OH 10.2% 5th +1.3pp 9th on par with peers
▸ Where is this changing? 240 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthPeople without health insurance
Loading tract map…
99 of 240 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Santa Ana, CA down 3.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 96% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Anaheim, CA down 2.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 88% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Miami, FL down 3.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 87% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.3pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Health

Adult obesity

▼ Lower is better Level only
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Adult obesity is somewhat above the peer median.

34.3%
20202022
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 9 similar-size cities best first
Place Latest Today's rank History Latest vs. peers
North Carolina ref 33.6%
United States ref 33.4%
San Francisco, CA 18.2% 1st 46% below peers
San Jose, CA 23.2% 2nd 31% below peers
Seattle, WA 23.4% 3rd 31% below peers
Austin, TX 29.2% 4th 13% below peers
Jacksonville, FL 33.7% 5th on par with peers
Charlotte, NC 34.3% 6th 2% above peers
Columbus, OH 38.4% 7th 14% above peers
Indianapolis, IN 39.5% 8th 17% above peers
Fort Worth, TX 39.7% 9th 18% above peers
CDC PLACES through 2022 modeled tract map about this metric
Health

Children without health insurance

▼ Lower is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Child uninsured rose 2.3 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 6.4% to 8.7% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.8pp). 4 of the 8 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 5 of 8 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: child uninsured rose 1.7 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (7.0% to 8.7%).
8.7%
20122024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 9 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
North Carolina ref 5.5% +0.5pp
United States ref 5.5% +0.4pp
San Jose, CA 1.8% 1st -0.3pp 1st 74% below peers
Indianapolis, IN 5.2% 4th -0.9pp 2nd 23% below peers
Jacksonville, FL 7.0% 6th +0.2pp 3rd 4% above peers
Austin, TX 9.6% 8th +0.6pp 4th 43% above peers
Fort Worth, TX 13.5% 9th +1.8pp 5th 102% above peers
Columbus, OH 6.7% 5th +1.3pp 6th on par with peers
Charlotte, NC 8.7% 7th +2.3pp 7th 30% above peers
Seattle, WA 1.9% 2nd +0.5pp 8th 71% below peers
San Francisco, CA 2.2% 3rd +0.7pp 9th 67% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 240 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthChildren without health insurance
Loading tract map…
98 of 240 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 4 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Lexington, KY down 1.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Jersey City, NJ down 1.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 96% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Lincoln, NE down 1.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 95% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B27001) through 2024 ±0.6pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Health data →
Education
Education

Adults with a bachelor's degree or higher

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

College attainment rose 3.7 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 44.3% to 48.0% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.9pp). 8 of the 8 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started mid-pack and has reached a genuinely better level; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 8 of 8 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: college attainment rose 7.3 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (40.7% to 48.0%).
48.0%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 9 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
North Carolina ref 35.6% +4.4pp
United States ref 35.7% +3.5pp
Jacksonville, FL 33.2% 8th +4.6pp 1st 30% below peers
Austin, TX 59.6% 3rd +7.8pp 2nd 26% above peers
Indianapolis, IN 34.9% 7th +4.0pp 3rd 26% below peers
Charlotte, NC 48.0% 4th +3.7pp 4th 1% above peers
San Jose, CA 47.3% 5th +3.6pp 5th on par with peers
Fort Worth, TX 32.0% 9th +2.4pp 6th 32% below peers
Seattle, WA 68.5% 1st +4.4pp 7th 45% above peers
Columbus, OH 38.2% 6th +1.6pp 8th 19% below peers
San Francisco, CA 60.3% 2nd +2.3pp 9th 28% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 240 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationAdults with a bachelor's degree or higher
Loading tract map…
99 of 240 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • St. Petersburg, FL up 6.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 94% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Winston-Salem, NC up 5.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 80% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Long Beach, CA up 4.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 79% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.7pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Education

Children ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool

▲ Higher is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Preschool enrollment fell 5.1 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 47.6% to 42.5% - more than the combined survey margin (±4.1pp). 1 of the 8 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 1 of 8 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: preschool enrollment fell 7.0 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (49.5% to 42.5%).
42.5%
20112024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 9 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
North Carolina ref 39.6% -3.4pp
United States ref 45.5%
Seattle, WA 70.3% 2nd +1.0pp 1st 66% above peers
Fort Worth, TX 39.0% 8th +0.1pp 2nd 8% below peers
Indianapolis, IN 41.2% 6th -0.4pp 3rd 3% below peers
San Francisco, CA 73.2% 1st -1.3pp 4th 72% above peers
Austin, TX 51.8% 4th -1.9pp 5th 22% above peers
San Jose, CA 54.3% 3rd -2.5pp 6th 28% above peers
Jacksonville, FL 41.1% 7th -2.5pp 7th 3% below peers
Charlotte, NC 42.5% 5th -5.1pp 8th on par with peers
Columbus, OH 33.8% 9th -5.7pp 9th 21% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 240 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationChildren ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool
Loading tract map…
92 of 240 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 20 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±3.1pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Education

Teens not in school and not working

▼ Lower is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Disconnected youth rose 2.7 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 5.8% to 8.6% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.7pp). That reverses the previous span, which went down between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys. 1 of the 8 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 1 of 8 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: disconnected youth rose 1.0 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (7.6% to 8.6%).
8.6%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 9 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
North Carolina ref 7.0% -0.2pp
United States ref 6.9% +0.3pp
Indianapolis, IN 7.8% 7th -1.3pp 1st 11% above peers
Austin, TX 5.5% 4th -0.5pp 2nd 22% below peers
Seattle, WA 3.1% 2nd -0.2pp 3rd 55% below peers
Fort Worth, TX 7.5% 6th +0.3pp 4th 7% above peers
San Francisco, CA 3.0% 1st +0.2pp 5th 58% below peers
San Jose, CA 3.8% 3rd +0.3pp 6th 46% below peers
Jacksonville, FL 10.3% 9th +1.3pp 7th 45% above peers
Columbus, OH 7.1% 5th +1.6pp 8th on par with peers
Charlotte, NC 8.6% 8th +2.7pp 9th 22% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 240 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationTeens not in school and not working
Loading tract map…
94 of 240 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 11 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

1
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Chandler, AZ down 3.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B14005) through 2024 ±1.4pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Education data →
Demographics
Demographics

Population

No better direction Rising
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Population rose about 5% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 857,425 to 903,844 - more than the combined survey margin (±233). 6 of the 8 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.

Rising beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 7 of 8 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: population rose about 17% from 2014 to 2024 (774,807 to 903,844).
903,844
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 9 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Fort Worth, TX 963,194 4th +10% 1st 5% above peers
Jacksonville, FL 977,670 3rd +10% 2nd 7% above peers
Charlotte, NC 903,844 6th +5% 3rd 1% below peers
Seattle, WA 754,195 9th +4% 4th 18% below peers
Columbus, OH 914,802 5th +4% 5th on par with peers
Austin, TX 979,539 2nd +3% 6th 7% above peers
Indianapolis, IN 885,860 7th +2% 7th 3% below peers
San Jose, CA 990,138 1st -4% 8th 8% above peers
San Francisco, CA 830,235 8th -5% 9th 9% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 240 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsPopulation
Loading tract map…
99 of 240 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±208 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Children's share of the population

No better direction Falling
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Children fell 1.0 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 23.7% to 22.7% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.2pp). 6 of the 8 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.

Falling beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 6 of 8 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: children fell 1.5 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (24.3% to 22.7%).
22.7%
20172024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 9 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
North Carolina ref 21.1% -0.7pp
United States ref 21.6% -0.7pp
San Francisco, CA 13.7% 9th +0.2pp 1st 38% below peers
Indianapolis, IN 24.8% 2nd +0.2pp 2nd 13% above peers
Jacksonville, FL 22.6% 4th -0.3pp 3rd 3% above peers
Columbus, OH 22.0% 5th -0.5pp 4th on par with peers
Charlotte, NC 22.7% 3rd -1.0pp 5th 3% above peers
Fort Worth, TX 26.4% 1st -1.3pp 6th 20% above peers
Seattle, WA 13.8% 8th -1.3pp 7th 37% below peers
San Jose, CA 20.5% 6th -2.0pp 8th 7% below peers
Austin, TX 18.0% 7th -2.4pp 9th 18% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 240 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren's share of the population
Loading tract map…
99 of 240 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.2pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Children in single-parent families

No better direction No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Single-parent changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (36.4% then, 36.4% now; margin ±2.2pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 2 of 8 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: single-parent fell 1.0 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (37.4% to 36.4%).
36.4%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 9 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
North Carolina ref 31.3% -1.4pp
United States ref 29.9% -0.2pp
San Jose, CA 22.6% 7th +1.6pp 1st 28% below peers
San Francisco, CA 21.4% 8th +0.6pp 2nd 32% below peers
Charlotte, NC 36.4% 4th -0.0pp 3rd 15% above peers
Jacksonville, FL 39.3% 2nd -0.8pp 4th 25% above peers
Columbus, OH 45.0% 1st -1.1pp 5th 43% above peers
Austin, TX 26.9% 6th -1.1pp 6th 15% below peers
Fort Worth, TX 31.5% 5th -1.4pp 7th on par with peers
Seattle, WA 21.1% 9th -1.0pp 8th 33% below peers
Indianapolis, IN 39.3% 3rd -4.9pp 9th 25% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 240 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren in single-parent families
Loading tract map…
99 of 240 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 4 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B09002) through 2024 ±1.7pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Young children with all parents in the labor force

No better direction No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Working parents changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (68.3% then, 68.8% now; margin ±3.9pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 4 of 8 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: working parents rose 1.0 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (67.8% to 68.8%).
68.8%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 9 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
North Carolina ref 66.9% +1.0pp
United States ref 68.1% +1.9pp
San Jose, CA 74.6% 1st +9.8pp 1st 7% above peers
Fort Worth, TX 67.7% 8th +7.7pp 2nd 3% below peers
Austin, TX 68.6% 7th +6.7pp 3rd 1% below peers
Seattle, WA 72.9% 3rd +3.8pp 4th 5% above peers
Indianapolis, IN 70.8% 4th +1.4pp 5th 2% above peers
San Francisco, CA 73.9% 2nd +0.8pp 6th 6% above peers
Charlotte, NC 68.8% 6th +0.5pp 7th 1% below peers
Jacksonville, FL 66.3% 9th -0.1pp 8th 5% below peers
Columbus, OH 69.5% 5th -2.2pp 9th on par with peers
▸ Where is this changing? 240 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsYoung children with all parents in the labor force
Loading tract map…
91 of 240 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 11 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B23008) through 2024 ±3.0pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Demographics data →