This badge answers one question: can Charlotte's own trend be trusted as a real improvement? The trend passed all three checks, so yes. The most recent 12 months agree with the multi-year trend.
Violent crime fell about 17% over the 12 months ending July 2026, faster than 57% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 456 (Apr 26) | -9.3% | |||
| San Jose, CA | 459 (May 26) | -20.5% | 1st | ||
| Indianapolis, IN | 608 (Jul 26) | -17.4% | 2nd | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 336 (Jul 26) | -17.2% | 3rd | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 560 (Jul 26) | -17.1% | 4th | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 459 (Jul 26) | -10.1% | 5th | ||
| Columbus, OH | 358 (Jun 26) | -8.7% | 6th | ||
| Austin, TX | 396 (Jul 26) | -5.3% | 7th | ||
| Seattle, WA | 652 (Jul 26) | +0.1% | 8th |
The last 12 months moved in the better direction. The multi-year trend has not (yet) passed the checks below, so no sustained-improvement claim is made.
Property crime fell about 11% over the 12 months ending July 2026, slower than 57% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 1,987 (Apr 26) | -12.2% | |||
| San Francisco, CA | 2,614 (Jul 26) | -17.5% | 1st | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 2,013 (Jul 26) | -16.9% | 2nd | ||
| Indianapolis, IN | 2,545 (Jul 26) | -12.7% | 3rd | ||
| Columbus, OH | 2,382 (Jun 26) | -11.5% | 4th | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 3,409 (Jul 26) | -10.6% | 5th | ||
| San Jose, CA | 2,311 (May 26) | -8.9% | 6th | ||
| Seattle, WA | 4,586 (Jul 26) | -6.8% | 7th | ||
| Austin, TX | 2,867 (Jul 26) | -5.3% | 8th |
The most recent 12 months moved against the better direction, whatever the longer window shows. The checks below judge the multi-year window. Charlotte is also worsening faster than most of the selected peers.
Homicides rose about 17% over the 12 months ending July 2026, faster than 100% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 6 (Apr 26) | -17.8% | |||
| Seattle, WA | 3 (Jul 26) | -38.9% | 1st | ||
| Columbus, OH | 7 (Jun 26) | -29.1% | 2nd | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 6 (Jul 26) | -22.8% | 3rd | ||
| Indianapolis, IN | 13 (Jul 26) | -20.4% | 4th | ||
| Austin, TX | 5 (Jul 26) | +0.0% | 5th | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 7 (Jul 26) | +4.2% | 6th | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 4 (Jul 26) | +6.4% | 7th | ||
| San Jose, CA | 2 (May 26) | +9.4% | 8th | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 10 (Jul 26) | +16.9% | 9th |
The last 12 months moved in the better direction. The multi-year trend has not (yet) passed the checks below, so no sustained-improvement claim is made. Charlotte is also improving faster than most of the selected peers.
Vehicle theft fell about 25% over the 12 months ending July 2026, faster than 71% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 303 (Apr 26) | -22.2% | |||
| Fort Worth, TX | 285 (Jul 26) | -32.5% | 1st | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 319 (Jul 26) | -31.7% | 2nd | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 499 (Jul 26) | -25.2% | 3rd | ||
| Austin, TX | 351 (Jul 26) | -22.9% | 4th | ||
| Indianapolis, IN | 478 (Jul 26) | -20.9% | 5th | ||
| Seattle, WA | 665 (Jul 26) | -18.6% | 6th | ||
| San Jose, CA | 490 (May 26) | -12.5% | 7th | ||
| Columbus, OH | 511 (Jun 26) | -6.4% | 8th |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Household income rose about 31% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from $62,817 to $82,068 (each survey's own dollars, not adjusted for inflation) - more than the combined survey margin (±$1,454).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina ref | $72,388 | +33% | |||||
| United States ref | $80,734 | +28% | |||||
| Indianapolis, IN | $66,219 | 8th | +38% | 1st | 19% below peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | $123,860 | 3rd | +34% | 2nd | 51% above peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | $146,427 | 1st | +34% | 3rd | 78% above peers | ||
| Austin, TX | $93,658 | 4th | +31% | 4th | 14% above peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | $82,068 | 5th | +31% | 5th | on par with peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | $79,507 | 6th | +28% | 6th | 3% below peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | $69,872 | 7th | +28% | 7th | 15% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | $140,970 | 2nd | +25% | 8th | 72% above peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | $66,082 | 9th | +23% | 9th | 19% below peers |
The last 12 months moved in the better direction. The multi-year trend has not (yet) passed the checks below, so no sustained-improvement claim is made.
Unemployment fell 0.5 percentage points over the 12 months ending July 2026, faster than 62% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina ref | 3.6% (Jul 26) | -0.3pp | ||||
| United States ref | 4.1% (Aug 26) | -0.2pp | ||||
| Columbus, OH | 3.3% (Jul 26) | 1st | -1.4pp | 1st | 15% below peers | |
| San Jose, CA | 4.2% (Jul 26) | 6th | -0.6pp | 2nd | 8% above peers | |
| San Francisco, CA | 3.9% (Jul 26) | 5th | -0.5pp | 3rd | on par with peers | |
| Charlotte, NC | 3.8% (Jul 26) | 3rd | -0.5pp | 4th | 3% below peers | |
| Indianapolis, IN | 3.7% (Jul 26) | 2nd | -0.5pp | 5th | 5% below peers | |
| Austin, TX | 3.8% (Jul 26) | 4th | +0.3pp | 6th | 3% below peers | |
| Seattle, WA | 4.6% (Jul 26) | 7th | +0.4pp | 7th | 18% above peers | |
| Fort Worth, TX | 4.8% (Jul 26) | 8th | +0.5pp | 8th | 23% above peers | |
| Jacksonville, FL | 5.1% (Jul 26) | 9th | +0.6pp | 9th | 31% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Poverty fell 1.2 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 12.8% to 11.7% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.7pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina ref | 13.0% | -1.7pp | |||||
| United States ref | 12.4% | ||||||
| Indianapolis, IN | 15.8% | 8th | -2.2pp | 1st | 32% above peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 9.9% | 2nd | -1.1pp | 2nd | 18% below peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 13.1% | 6th | -1.4pp | 3rd | 9% above peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 12.0% | 5th | -1.2pp | 4th | on par with peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 11.7% | 4th | -1.2pp | 5th | 3% below peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 18.1% | 9th | -1.4pp | 6th | 51% above peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 8.1% | 1st | -0.6pp | 7th | 32% below peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 14.5% | 7th | -0.3pp | 8th | 21% above peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 11.2% | 3rd | +0.8pp | 9th | 7% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Child poverty fell 1.7 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 18.6% to 16.8% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.1pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina ref | 17.7% | -3.5pp | |||||
| United States ref | 16.1% | ||||||
| Indianapolis, IN | 22.4% | 8th | -4.4pp | 1st | 33% above peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 15.1% | 4th | -2.8pp | 2nd | 10% below peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 9.3% | 3rd | -1.6pp | 3rd | 45% below peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 8.2% | 1st | -1.2pp | 4th | 51% below peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 17.7% | 6th | -2.3pp | 5th | 5% above peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 26.0% | 9th | -3.3pp | 6th | 55% above peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 19.6% | 7th | -2.4pp | 7th | 16% above peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 16.8% | 5th | -1.7pp | 8th | on par with peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 9.0% | 2nd | -0.9pp | 9th | 46% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Broadband rose 6.2 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 87.5% to 93.7% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.5pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina ref | 90.2% | +9.1pp | |||||
| United States ref | 91.1% | ||||||
| Indianapolis, IN | 91.9% | 8th | +12.6pp | 1st | 2% below peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 92.3% | 7th | +8.0pp | 2nd | 1% below peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 93.6% | 5th | +7.6pp | 3rd | on par with peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 91.0% | 9th | +7.1pp | 4th | 3% below peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 93.8% | 3rd | +6.2pp | 5th | on par with peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 93.7% | 4th | +6.2pp | 6th | on par with peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 93.1% | 6th | +5.3pp | 7th | 1% below peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 95.5% | 1st | +4.1pp | 8th | 2% above peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 94.5% | 2nd | +3.9pp | 9th | 1% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Inequality changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (0.50 then, 0.50 now; margin ±0.01).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina ref | 0.48 | +0.001 | |||||
| United States ref | 0.48 | +0.001 | |||||
| Indianapolis, IN | 0.47 | 5th | -0.018 | 1st | on par with peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 0.45 | 2nd | -0.005 | 2nd | 3% below peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 0.49 | 6th | +0.002 | 3rd | 4% above peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 0.47 | 4th | +0.002 | 4th | on par with peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 0.45 | 1st | +0.003 | 5th | 4% below peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 0.49 | 7th | +0.004 | 6th | 5% above peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 0.50 | 8th | +0.004 | 7th | 7% above peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 0.52 | 9th | +0.012 | 8th | 12% above peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 0.46 | 3rd | +0.012 | 9th | 1% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
SNAP fell 1.4 percentage points between the 2014-2018 and 2019-2023 surveys, from 11.2% to 9.8% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.6pp).
| Place | Latest2019-2023 survey | Today's rank | Change2014-2018 → 2019-2023 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina ref | 12.5% | -0.6pp | |||||
| United States ref | 11.8% | -0.5pp | |||||
| Austin, TX | 6.2% | 1st | -1.9pp | 1st | 37% below peers | ||
| Indianapolis, IN | 12.4% | 7th | -2.5pp | 2nd | 27% above peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 12.8% | 8th | -2.5pp | 3rd | 31% above peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 14.6% | 9th | -2.2pp | 4th | 49% above peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 12.3% | 6th | -1.8pp | 5th | 26% above peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 9.8% | 5th | -1.4pp | 6th | on par with peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 7.5% | 2nd | -1.0pp | 7th | 23% below peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 7.8% | 3rd | +1.3pp | 8th | 21% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 9.7% | 4th | +5.0pp | 9th | 1% below peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers.
Home value fell about 1% over the 12 months ending August 2026, faster than 57% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina ref | $334,773 (Aug 26) | -0.0% | ||||
| United States ref | $368,697 (Aug 26) | +1.2% | ||||
| San Francisco, CA | $1,424,767 (Aug 26) | 1st | +13.6% | 1st | 186% above peers | |
| San Jose, CA | $1,362,808 (Aug 26) | 2nd | -0.6% | 2nd | 174% above peers | |
| Jacksonville, FL | $285,103 (Aug 26) | 7th | -0.8% | 3rd | 43% below peers | |
| Columbus, OH | $247,002 (Aug 26) | 8th | -1.0% | 4th | 50% below peers | |
| Charlotte, NC | $392,573 (Aug 26) | 5th | -1.1% | 5th | 21% below peers | |
| Seattle, WA | $833,192 (Aug 26) | 3rd | -1.6% | 6th | 68% above peers | |
| Fort Worth, TX | $295,800 (Aug 26) | 6th | -1.8% | 7th | 41% below peers | |
| Austin, TX | $497,418 (Aug 26) | 4th | -3.7% | 8th | on par with peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers. Most of the selected peers are falling faster.
Starter homes fell about 1% over the 12 months ending August 2026, slower than 71% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina ref | $194,567 (Aug 26) | +1.6% | ||||
| United States ref | $200,550 (Aug 26) | +2.2% | ||||
| San Francisco, CA | $932,784 (Aug 26) | 1st | +10.5% | 1st | 183% above peers | |
| Columbus, OH | $165,068 (Aug 26) | 8th | -0.9% | 2nd | 50% below peers | |
| Charlotte, NC | $286,102 (Aug 26) | 5th | -1.1% | 3rd | 13% below peers | |
| Fort Worth, TX | $207,847 (Aug 26) | 6th | -1.2% | 4th | 37% below peers | |
| Jacksonville, FL | $175,906 (Aug 26) | 7th | -1.8% | 5th | 47% below peers | |
| San Jose, CA | $898,474 (Aug 26) | 2nd | -2.0% | 6th | 173% above peers | |
| Seattle, WA | $555,481 (Aug 26) | 3rd | -2.1% | 7th | 69% above peers | |
| Austin, TX | $329,172 (Aug 26) | 4th | -4.7% | 8th | on par with peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin, in the wrong direction for this metric.
Homeownership fell 1.9 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 52.9% to 51.0% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.8pp). That is movement in the wrong direction.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina ref | 66.6% | +1.4pp | |||||
| United States ref | 65.2% | ||||||
| Indianapolis, IN | 56.0% | 3rd | +2.9pp | 1st | 10% above peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 57.6% | 1st | +1.5pp | 2nd | 13% above peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 38.2% | 9th | +0.6pp | 3rd | 25% below peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 57.0% | 2nd | -0.4pp | 4th | 12% above peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 44.1% | 6th | -0.6pp | 5th | 13% below peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 55.8% | 4th | -1.0pp | 6th | 9% above peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 51.0% | 5th | -1.9pp | 7th | on par with peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 43.5% | 8th | -1.7pp | 8th | 15% below peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 43.7% | 7th | -2.0pp | 9th | 14% below peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers.
Rent rose about 1% over the 12 months ending August 2026, slower than 57% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States ref | $1,948 (Aug 26) | +2.5% | ||||
| San Francisco, CA | $4,682 (Aug 26) | 1st | +25.2% | 1st | 169% above peers | |
| San Jose, CA | $3,563 (Aug 26) | 2nd | +6.5% | 2nd | 104% above peers | |
| Columbus, OH | $1,450 (Aug 26) | 8th | +2.4% | 3rd | 17% below peers | |
| Jacksonville, FL | $1,601 (Aug 26) | 6th | +2.0% | 4th | 8% below peers | |
| Charlotte, NC | $1,744 (Aug 26) | 4th | +0.7% | 5th | on par with peers | |
| Fort Worth, TX | $1,615 (Aug 26) | 5th | +0.5% | 6th | 7% below peers | |
| Seattle, WA | $2,234 (Aug 26) | 3rd | +0.3% | 7th | 28% above peers | |
| Austin, TX | $1,586 (Aug 26) | 7th | -0.3% | 8th | 9% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin, in the wrong direction for this metric.
Cost burden rose 1.9 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 33.0% to 34.9% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.1pp). That reverses the previous span, which went down between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys. That is movement in the wrong direction.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina ref | 28.8% | -0.2pp | |||||
| United States ref | 32.2% | +0.4pp | |||||
| Indianapolis, IN | 32.9% | 1st | -1.8pp | 1st | 8% below peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 37.5% | 7th | -1.0pp | 2nd | 5% above peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 34.5% | 2nd | -0.5pp | 3rd | 3% below peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 37.2% | 6th | +1.0pp | 4th | 5% above peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 34.9% | 3rd | +1.6pp | 5th | 2% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 35.6% | 5th | +1.7pp | 6th | on par with peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 34.9% | 4th | +1.9pp | 7th | 2% below peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 37.7% | 8th | +3.1pp | 8th | 6% above peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 37.8% | 9th | +4.4pp | 9th | 6% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
No vehicle changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (6.4% then, 6.4% now; margin ±0.5pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina ref | 5.3% | -0.5pp | |||||
| United States ref | 8.3% | -0.3pp | |||||
| Indianapolis, IN | 8.4% | 6th | -0.9pp | 1st | 15% above peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 7.3% | 5th | -0.6pp | 2nd | on par with peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 8.5% | 7th | -0.4pp | 3rd | 16% above peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 30.2% | 9th | -0.7pp | 4th | 313% above peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 5.5% | 1st | -0.0pp | 5th | 25% below peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 6.4% | 3rd | +0.0pp | 6th | 12% below peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 19.0% | 8th | +1.2pp | 7th | 160% above peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 7.1% | 4th | +0.9pp | 8th | 3% below peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 6.1% | 2nd | +0.9pp | 9th | 16% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (12.5% then, 12.8% now; margin ±0.4pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina ref | 9.8% | -0.9pp | |||||
| United States ref | 8.4% | -0.4pp | |||||
| Indianapolis, IN | 8.8% | 4th | -1.6pp | 1st | 15% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 3.3% | 1st | -0.4pp | 2nd | 68% below peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 12.4% | 7th | -1.2pp | 3rd | 20% above peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 4.8% | 3rd | -0.3pp | 4th | 53% below peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 11.2% | 6th | -0.8pp | 5th | 9% above peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 4.2% | 2nd | +0.0pp | 6th | 59% below peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 18.6% | 9th | +0.2pp | 7th | 80% above peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 12.8% | 8th | +0.3pp | 8th | 24% above peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 10.3% | 5th | +1.3pp | 9th | on par with peers |
Modeled estimate with no usable trend; the level is shown and no trend claims are made.
Adult obesity is somewhat above the peer median.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina ref | 33.6% | |||
| United States ref | 33.4% | |||
| San Francisco, CA | 18.2% | 1st | 46% below peers | |
| San Jose, CA | 23.2% | 2nd | 31% below peers | |
| Seattle, WA | 23.4% | 3rd | 31% below peers | |
| Austin, TX | 29.2% | 4th | 13% below peers | |
| Jacksonville, FL | 33.7% | 5th | on par with peers | |
| Charlotte, NC | 34.3% | 6th | 2% above peers | |
| Columbus, OH | 38.4% | 7th | 14% above peers | |
| Indianapolis, IN | 39.5% | 8th | 17% above peers | |
| Fort Worth, TX | 39.7% | 9th | 18% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin, in the wrong direction for this metric.
Child uninsured rose 2.3 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 6.4% to 8.7% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.8pp). That is movement in the wrong direction.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina ref | 5.5% | +0.5pp | |||||
| United States ref | 5.5% | +0.4pp | |||||
| San Jose, CA | 1.8% | 1st | -0.3pp | 1st | 74% below peers | ||
| Indianapolis, IN | 5.2% | 4th | -0.9pp | 2nd | 23% below peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 7.0% | 6th | +0.2pp | 3rd | 4% above peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 9.6% | 8th | +0.6pp | 4th | 43% above peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 13.5% | 9th | +1.8pp | 5th | 102% above peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 6.7% | 5th | +1.3pp | 6th | on par with peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 8.7% | 7th | +2.3pp | 7th | 30% above peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 1.9% | 2nd | +0.5pp | 8th | 71% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 2.2% | 3rd | +0.7pp | 9th | 67% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
College attainment rose 3.7 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 44.3% to 48.0% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.9pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina ref | 35.6% | +4.4pp | |||||
| United States ref | 35.7% | +3.5pp | |||||
| Jacksonville, FL | 33.2% | 8th | +4.6pp | 1st | 30% below peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 59.6% | 3rd | +7.8pp | 2nd | 26% above peers | ||
| Indianapolis, IN | 34.9% | 7th | +4.0pp | 3rd | 26% below peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 48.0% | 4th | +3.7pp | 4th | 1% above peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 47.3% | 5th | +3.6pp | 5th | on par with peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 32.0% | 9th | +2.4pp | 6th | 32% below peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 68.5% | 1st | +4.4pp | 7th | 45% above peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 38.2% | 6th | +1.6pp | 8th | 19% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 60.3% | 2nd | +2.3pp | 9th | 28% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin, in the wrong direction for this metric.
Preschool enrollment fell 5.1 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 47.6% to 42.5% - more than the combined survey margin (±4.1pp). That is movement in the wrong direction.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina ref | 39.6% | -3.4pp | |||||
| United States ref | 45.5% | ||||||
| Seattle, WA | 70.3% | 2nd | +1.0pp | 1st | 66% above peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 39.0% | 8th | +0.1pp | 2nd | 8% below peers | ||
| Indianapolis, IN | 41.2% | 6th | -0.4pp | 3rd | 3% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 73.2% | 1st | -1.3pp | 4th | 72% above peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 51.8% | 4th | -1.9pp | 5th | 22% above peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 54.3% | 3rd | -2.5pp | 6th | 28% above peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 41.1% | 7th | -2.5pp | 7th | 3% below peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 42.5% | 5th | -5.1pp | 8th | on par with peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 33.8% | 9th | -5.7pp | 9th | 21% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin, in the wrong direction for this metric.
Disconnected youth rose 2.7 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 5.8% to 8.6% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.7pp). That reverses the previous span, which went down between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys. That is movement in the wrong direction.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina ref | 7.0% | -0.2pp | |||||
| United States ref | 6.9% | +0.3pp | |||||
| Indianapolis, IN | 7.8% | 7th | -1.3pp | 1st | 11% above peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 5.5% | 4th | -0.5pp | 2nd | 22% below peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 3.1% | 2nd | -0.2pp | 3rd | 55% below peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 7.5% | 6th | +0.3pp | 4th | 7% above peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 3.0% | 1st | +0.2pp | 5th | 58% below peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 3.8% | 3rd | +0.3pp | 6th | 46% below peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 10.3% | 9th | +1.3pp | 7th | 45% above peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 7.1% | 5th | +1.6pp | 8th | on par with peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 8.6% | 8th | +2.7pp | 9th | 22% above peers |
A real change beyond the survey margin; neither direction is inherently better for this metric.
Population rose about 5% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 857,425 to 903,844 - more than the combined survey margin (±233).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fort Worth, TX | 963,194 | 4th | +10% | 1st | 5% above peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 977,670 | 3rd | +10% | 2nd | 7% above peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 903,844 | 6th | +5% | 3rd | 1% below peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 754,195 | 9th | +4% | 4th | 18% below peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 914,802 | 5th | +4% | 5th | on par with peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 979,539 | 2nd | +3% | 6th | 7% above peers | ||
| Indianapolis, IN | 885,860 | 7th | +2% | 7th | 3% below peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 990,138 | 1st | -4% | 8th | 8% above peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 830,235 | 8th | -5% | 9th | 9% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Single-parent changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (36.4% then, 36.4% now; margin ±2.2pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina ref | 31.3% | -1.4pp | |||||
| United States ref | 29.9% | -0.2pp | |||||
| San Jose, CA | 22.6% | 7th | +1.6pp | 1st | 28% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 21.4% | 8th | +0.6pp | 2nd | 32% below peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 36.4% | 4th | -0.0pp | 3rd | 15% above peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 39.3% | 2nd | -0.8pp | 4th | 25% above peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 45.0% | 1st | -1.1pp | 5th | 43% above peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 26.9% | 6th | -1.1pp | 6th | 15% below peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 31.5% | 5th | -1.4pp | 7th | on par with peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 21.1% | 9th | -1.0pp | 8th | 33% below peers | ||
| Indianapolis, IN | 39.3% | 3rd | -4.9pp | 9th | 25% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Working parents changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (68.3% then, 68.8% now; margin ±3.9pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina ref | 66.9% | +1.0pp | |||||
| United States ref | 68.1% | +1.9pp | |||||
| San Jose, CA | 74.6% | 1st | +9.8pp | 1st | 7% above peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 67.7% | 8th | +7.7pp | 2nd | 3% below peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 68.6% | 7th | +6.7pp | 3rd | 1% below peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 72.9% | 3rd | +3.8pp | 4th | 5% above peers | ||
| Indianapolis, IN | 70.8% | 4th | +1.4pp | 5th | 2% above peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 73.9% | 2nd | +0.8pp | 6th | 6% above peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 68.8% | 6th | +0.5pp | 7th | 1% below peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 66.3% | 9th | -0.1pp | 8th | 5% below peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 69.5% | 5th | -2.2pp | 9th | on par with peers |