DataWorks Commons
Austin, TX
← All cities
979,539 people (2024) 250k-1m South

Bright spots 11 indicators

Where Austin, TX shows a real improvement in recent years, or stands clearly ahead of its peers. How this is calculated →

What needs attention 6 indicators

Where Austin, TX shows a real worsening in recent years, or trails its peers clearly. How this is calculated →

Big shifts 6 indicators

Real moves and big gaps, where neither direction is simply good or bad. Biggest relative change first; big-gap cards come last. How this is calculated →

All indicators

Public Safety
Public Safety

Violent crime rate

▼ Lower is better Improving recently, trailing peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Violent crime fell about 10% over the 12 months ending May 2026, slower than 80% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: violent crime fell about 2% a year from 2021 to 2026, slower than 70% of similar-size cities. The change does not yet pass the noise and consistency checks, so treat it as a raw signal.
Longer view: violent crime rose about 1% a year from 2018 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: 406 in May 2026, down from 451 a year earlier.
406 per 100k
2018May 2026
Compare all 11 similar-size cities by change rank
Each place's latest 12 months compares against its prior 12. significant improvement · significant worsening · within chance fluctuation for counts this size (Poisson test at 90%; these are administrative tallies, so the test covers event randomness, not survey error).
Place Latestper 100k Today's rank Changelast 12 months Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
U.S. (RTCI sample) ref 456 (Apr 26) -9.3%
San Jose, CA 457 (May 26) 5th -20.5% 1st 2% below peers
Fort Worth, TX 342 (May 26) 2nd -20.3% 2nd 27% below peers
Charlotte, NC 541 (May 26) 7th -16.9% 3rd 15% above peers
Columbus, OH 364 (Apr 26) 3rd -15.3% 4th 22% below peers
Dallas, TX 565 (May 26) 8th -14.9% 5th 21% above peers
San Francisco, CA 468 (May 26) 6th -13.5% 6th on par with peers
Indianapolis, IN 635 (May 26) 9th -12.2% 7th 36% above peers
Denver, CO 837 (May 26) 11th -11.9% 8th 79% above peers
Austin, TX 406 (May 26) 4th -9.9% 9th 13% below peers
Seattle, WA 648 (May 26) 10th +0.1% 10th 38% above peers
Jacksonville, FL 7 (May 26) 1st +14.2% 11th 98% below peers

Peers worth a call

1
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Because this metric moves monthly, each listed city also held or improved over its own most recent 12 months (shown on each row), and the list is ordered by that recent movement. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Irving, TX down about 8% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 6% a year · 2021-2026
Public Safety

Property crime rate

▼ Lower is better Verified improver
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Property crime fell about 11% over the 12 months ending May 2026, faster than 56% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: property crime fell about 3% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 56% of similar-size cities. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
Longer view: property crime fell about 2% a year from 2018 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: 2,921 in May 2026, down from 3,299 a year earlier.
2,921 per 100k
2018May 2026
Compare all 10 similar-size cities by change rank
Each place's latest 12 months compares against its prior 12. significant improvement · significant worsening · within chance fluctuation for counts this size (Poisson test at 90%; these are administrative tallies, so the test covers event randomness, not survey error).
Place Latestper 100k Today's rank Changelast 12 months Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
U.S. (RTCI sample) ref 1,987 (Apr 26) -12.2%
San Francisco, CA 2,679 (May 26) 5th -21.6% 1st 8% below peers
Fort Worth, TX 2,047 (May 26) 1st -20.2% 2nd 30% below peers
Indianapolis, IN 2,576 (May 26) 4th -15.6% 3rd 12% below peers
Denver, CO 4,024 (May 26) 9th -11.9% 4th 38% above peers
Austin, TX 2,921 (May 26) 6th -11.4% 5th on par with peers
Dallas, TX 3,024 (May 26) 7th -9.7% 6th 4% above peers
Columbus, OH 2,488 (Apr 26) 3rd -9.4% 7th 15% below peers
Charlotte, NC 3,261 (May 26) 8th -9.0% 8th 12% above peers
San Jose, CA 2,300 (May 26) 2nd -8.9% 9th 21% below peers
Seattle, WA 4,568 (May 26) 10th -7.8% 10th 56% above peers

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Because this metric moves monthly, each listed city also held or improved over its own most recent 12 months (shown on each row), and the list is ordered by that recent movement. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Aurora, CO down about 31% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 10% a year · 2021-2026
  • Tucson, AZ down about 29% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 7% a year · 2021-2026
  • Oklahoma City, OK down about 29% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 6% a year · 2021-2026
Public Safety

Homicide rate

▼ Lower is better Improving recently, leading peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Homicide fell about 19% over the 12 months ending May 2026, faster than 70% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: homicide fell about 3% a year from 2021 to 2026, slower than 90% of similar-size cities. The change does not yet pass the noise and consistency checks, so treat it as a raw signal.
Longer view: homicide rose about 17% a year from 2018 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: 5 in May 2026, down from 6 a year earlier.
5 per 100k
2018May 2026
Compare all 11 similar-size cities by change rank
Each place's latest 12 months compares against its prior 12. significant improvement · significant worsening · within chance fluctuation for counts this size (Poisson test at 90%; these are administrative tallies, so the test covers event randomness, not survey error).
Place Latestper 100k Today's rank Changelast 12 months Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
U.S. (RTCI sample) ref 6 (Apr 26) -17.8%
Seattle, WA 4 (May 26) 2nd -34.0% 1st 41% below peers
Columbus, OH 8 (Apr 26) 8th -28.2% 2nd 21% above peers
Fort Worth, TX 6 (May 26) 5th -23.2% 3rd 6% below peers
Austin, TX 5 (May 26) 4th -18.5% 4th 24% below peers
Indianapolis, IN 14 (May 26) 11th -17.7% 5th 114% above peers
Dallas, TX 10 (May 26) 10th -16.8% 6th 53% above peers
Denver, CO 7 (May 26) 6th -10.9% 7th on par with peers
Charlotte, NC 9 (May 26) 9th -1.1% 8th 32% above peers
San Francisco, CA 4 (May 26) 3rd +0.0% 9th 38% below peers
San Jose, CA 2 (May 26) 1st +9.5% 10th 65% below peers
Jacksonville, FL 7 (May 26) 7th +14.2% 11th 8% above peers
Public Safety

Motor vehicle theft rate

▼ Lower is better Improving recently
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Vehicle theft fell about 27% over the 12 months ending May 2026, faster than 56% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: vehicle theft rose about 1% a year from 2021 to 2026. That is movement in the wrong direction.
Longer view: vehicle theft rose about 28% a year from 2018 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: 380 in May 2026, down from 519 a year earlier.
380 per 100k
2018May 2026
Compare all 10 similar-size cities by change rank
Each place's latest 12 months compares against its prior 12. significant improvement · significant worsening · within chance fluctuation for counts this size (Poisson test at 90%; these are administrative tallies, so the test covers event randomness, not survey error).
Place Latestper 100k Today's rank Changelast 12 months Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
U.S. (RTCI sample) ref 303 (Apr 26) -22.2%
San Francisco, CA 331 (May 26) 2nd -39.0% 1st 34% below peers
Denver, CO 667 (May 26) 8th -36.4% 2nd 33% above peers
Fort Worth, TX 301 (May 26) 1st -35.0% 3rd 40% below peers
Dallas, TX 735 (May 26) 10th -29.8% 4th 47% above peers
Austin, TX 380 (May 26) 3rd -26.8% 5th 24% below peers
Indianapolis, IN 491 (May 26) 5th -24.2% 6th 2% below peers
Charlotte, NC 500 (May 26) 6th -22.1% 7th on par with peers
Seattle, WA 696 (May 26) 9th -15.9% 8th 39% above peers
San Jose, CA 488 (May 26) 4th -12.5% 9th 2% below peers
Columbus, OH 516 (Apr 26) 7th -7.7% 10th 3% above peers

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Because this metric moves monthly, each listed city also held or improved over its own most recent 12 months (shown on each row), and the list is ordered by that recent movement. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Boston, MA down about 39% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 8% a year · 2021-2026
  • Virginia Beach, VA down about 25% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 18% a year · 2021-2026
  • Chandler, AZ down about 20% over the 12 months ending May 2026 · sustained: down about 12% a year · 2021-2026
See all Public Safety data →
Economy
Economy

Median household income

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Household income rose about 31% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from $71,576 to $93,658 (each survey's own dollars, not adjusted for inflation) - more than the combined survey margin (±$1,894). 10 of the 10 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the stronger third of similar-size cities and kept improving; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 10 of 10 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: household income rose about 70% from 2014 to 2024 ($55,216 to $93,658).
$93,658
20102024
Compare all 11 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Texas ref $78,476 +27%
United States ref $80,734 +28%
Indianapolis, IN $66,219 10th +38% 1st 19% below peers
Denver, CO $94,718 4th +38% 2nd 15% above peers
Seattle, WA $123,860 3rd +34% 3rd 51% above peers
Dallas, TX $70,518 8th +34% 4th 14% below peers
San Jose, CA $146,427 1st +34% 5th 78% above peers
Austin, TX $93,658 5th +31% 6th 14% above peers
Charlotte, NC $82,068 6th +31% 7th on par with peers
Fort Worth, TX $79,507 7th +28% 8th 3% below peers
Jacksonville, FL $69,872 9th +28% 9th 15% below peers
San Francisco, CA $140,970 2nd +25% 10th 72% above peers
Columbus, OH $66,082 11th +23% 11th 19% below peers
Where is this changing? 219 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyMedian household income
Loading tract map…
133 of 219 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 3 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Santa Ana, CA up about 42% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 94% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Jersey City, NJ up about 38% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 84% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Denver, CO up about 38% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 83% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±$1,670 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Unemployment rate

▼ Lower is better Worsening, slower than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Unemployment rose about 0.1 percentage points a year from 2022 to 2025. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening slower than 80% of similar-size cities over 2022-2025.
Longer view: unemployment rose less than 0.1 percentage points a year from 2015 to 2025.
Most recent monthly reading: 3.4% in May 2026, up from 3.1% a year earlier.
3.4%
1990May 2026
Compare all 11 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Texas ref 4.3% (May 26) +0.2pp
United States ref 4.2% (Jun 26) +0.1pp
Columbus, OH 2.8% (May 26) 1st -1.6pp 1st 22% below peers
San Jose, CA 3.5% (May 26) 5th -0.5pp 2nd 3% below peers
San Francisco, CA 3.3% (May 26) 2nd -0.5pp 3rd 8% below peers
Indianapolis, IN 3.3% (May 26) 3rd -0.4pp 4th 8% below peers
Denver, CO 3.8% (May 26) 7th -0.2pp 5th 6% above peers
Charlotte, NC 3.6% (May 26) 6th -0.2pp 6th on par with peers
Austin, TX 3.4% (May 26) 4th +0.3pp 7th 6% below peers
Fort Worth, TX 4.1% (May 26) 8th +0.3pp 8th 14% above peers
Dallas, TX 4.1% (May 26) 9th +0.3pp 9th 14% above peers
Seattle, WA 4.5% (May 26) 10th +0.7pp 10th 25% above peers
Jacksonville, FL 4.7% (May 26) 11th +0.9pp 11th 31% above peers
Economy

Share of people below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Poverty fell 1.2 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 12.9% to 11.7% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.7pp). 8 of the 10 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started mid-pack and has reached a genuinely better level; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 9 of 10 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: poverty fell 6.9 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (18.6% to 11.7%).
11.7%
20112024
Compare all 11 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Texas ref 13.0% -1.0pp
United States ref 12.0%
Denver, CO 11.1% 4th -1.6pp 1st 6% below peers
Indianapolis, IN 15.5% 9th -2.1pp 2nd 32% above peers
Dallas, TX 16.5% 10th -2.2pp 3rd 41% above peers
Seattle, WA 9.6% 2nd -1.1pp 4th 18% below peers
Fort Worth, TX 12.9% 7th -1.4pp 5th 10% above peers
Austin, TX 11.7% 6th -1.2pp 6th on par with peers
Charlotte, NC 11.5% 5th -1.2pp 7th 2% below peers
Columbus, OH 17.7% 11th -1.3pp 8th 51% above peers
San Jose, CA 8.0% 1st -0.6pp 9th 31% below peers
Jacksonville, FL 14.2% 8th -0.3pp 10th 21% above peers
San Francisco, CA 11.0% 3rd +0.8pp 11th 6% below peers
Where is this changing? 219 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of people below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
133 of 219 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 1 has too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Santa Ana, CA down 4.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Mesa, AZ down 4.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Durham, NC down 4.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.6pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Share of children below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Child poverty fell 2.8 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 18.0% to 15.1% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.4pp). 9 of the 10 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the stronger third of similar-size cities and kept improving; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 9 of 10 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: child poverty fell 11.5 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (26.6% to 15.1%).
15.1%
20132024
Compare all 11 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Texas ref 18.7% -2.3pp
United States ref 16.1%
Dallas, TX 24.3% 10th -5.0pp 1st 44% above peers
Indianapolis, IN 22.4% 9th -4.4pp 2nd 33% above peers
Austin, TX 15.1% 4th -2.8pp 3rd 10% below peers
Seattle, WA 9.3% 3rd -1.6pp 4th 45% below peers
San Jose, CA 8.2% 1st -1.2pp 5th 51% below peers
Denver, CO 16.0% 5th -2.2pp 6th 5% below peers
Fort Worth, TX 17.7% 7th -2.3pp 7th 5% above peers
Columbus, OH 26.0% 11th -3.3pp 8th 55% above peers
Jacksonville, FL 19.6% 8th -2.4pp 9th 16% above peers
Charlotte, NC 16.8% 6th -1.7pp 10th on par with peers
San Francisco, CA 9.0% 2nd -0.9pp 11th 46% below peers
Where is this changing? 219 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of children below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
131 of 219 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 6 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Colorado Springs, CO down 5.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Anchorage municipality, AK down 2.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 72% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Riverside, CA down 3.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 71% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.2pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Households with a broadband internet subscription

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Broadband rose 6.2 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 87.6% to 93.8% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.7pp). 10 of the 10 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the stronger third of similar-size cities and kept improving; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 10 of 10 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: broadband rose 9.6 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (84.2% to 93.8%).
93.8%
20172024
Compare all 11 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Texas ref 91.4% +9.3pp
United States ref 91.1%
Dallas, TX 91.0% 10th +14.1pp 1st 2% below peers
Indianapolis, IN 91.9% 9th +12.6pp 2nd 1% below peers
Fort Worth, TX 92.3% 8th +8.0pp 3rd 1% below peers
Columbus, OH 93.6% 5th +7.6pp 4th 1% above peers
Jacksonville, FL 91.0% 11th +7.1pp 5th 2% below peers
Austin, TX 93.8% 3rd +6.2pp 6th 1% above peers
Charlotte, NC 93.7% 4th +6.2pp 7th 1% above peers
Denver, CO 93.0% 7th +6.1pp 8th on par with peers
San Francisco, CA 93.1% 6th +5.3pp 9th on par with peers
San Jose, CA 95.5% 1st +4.1pp 10th 3% above peers
Seattle, WA 94.5% 2nd +3.9pp 11th 2% above peers
Where is this changing? 219 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds with a broadband internet subscription
Loading tract map…
134 of 219 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Bakersfield, CA up 6.8pp between its surveys · a smaller real gain than 61% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Durham, NC up 6.7pp between its surveys · a smaller real gain than 62% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Riverside, CA up 6.5pp between its surveys · a smaller real gain than 66% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.4pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Income inequality (Gini index)

▼ Lower is better Turning up (early signal)
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Inequality changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (0.48 then, 0.49 now; margin ±0.01). The newest releases lean upward: each of the last 4 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 4 of 10 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: inequality held roughly steady from 2014 to 2024.
0.49
20102024
Compare all 11 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Texas ref 0.48 -0.001
United States ref 0.48 +0.001
Indianapolis, IN 0.47 5th -0.018 1st 4% below peers
Dallas, TX 0.53 11th -0.012 2nd 8% above peers
Fort Worth, TX 0.45 2nd -0.005 3rd 7% below peers
Denver, CO 0.49 8th -0.000 4th 1% above peers
Austin, TX 0.49 6th +0.002 5th on par with peers
Jacksonville, FL 0.47 4th +0.002 6th 4% below peers
Columbus, OH 0.45 1st +0.003 7th 8% below peers
Seattle, WA 0.49 7th +0.004 8th 1% above peers
Charlotte, NC 0.50 9th +0.004 9th 3% above peers
San Francisco, CA 0.52 10th +0.012 10th 7% above peers
San Jose, CA 0.46 3rd +0.012 11th 5% below peers
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B19083) through 2024 ±0.01 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys *Early signal: consecutive releases agree on direction only; the size of the newest movement is not measurable from overlapping surveys. about this metric
Economy

Households receiving SNAP

▼ Lower is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

SNAP fell 1.9 percentage points between the 2014-2018 and 2019-2023 surveys, from 8.1% to 6.2% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.5pp). 8 of the 10 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the stronger third of similar-size cities and kept improving; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2014-2018 vs 2019-2023 surveys; 10 of 10 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: snap fell 4.1 percentage points from 2013 to 2023 (10.3% to 6.2%).
6.2%
20102023
Compare all 11 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2019-2023 survey Today's rank Change2014-2018 → 2019-2023 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Texas ref 11.4% -0.8pp
United States ref 11.8% -0.5pp
Austin, TX 6.2% 1st -1.9pp 1st 37% below peers
Indianapolis, IN 12.4% 9th -2.5pp 2nd 27% above peers
Dallas, TX 11.7% 7th -2.3pp 3rd 20% above peers
Columbus, OH 12.8% 10th -2.5pp 4th 31% above peers
Jacksonville, FL 14.6% 11th -2.2pp 5th 49% above peers
Fort Worth, TX 12.3% 8th -1.8pp 6th 26% above peers
Charlotte, NC 9.8% 6th -1.4pp 7th on par with peers
Seattle, WA 7.5% 2nd -1.0pp 8th 23% below peers
Denver, CO 8.3% 4th -0.7pp 9th 15% below peers
San Jose, CA 7.8% 3rd +1.3pp 10th 21% below peers
San Francisco, CA 9.7% 5th +5.0pp 11th 1% below peers
Where is this changing? 219 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2018 to 2023, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds receiving SNAP
Loading tract map…
133 of 219 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 3 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Irving, TX down 2.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2018-2023
  • Mesa, AZ down 1.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 91% of this group · 2018-2023
  • Lexington, KY down 1.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 89% of this group · 2018-2023
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2023 ±0.4pp at 90% confidence (2023 estimate) survey trend: 2014-2018 vs 2019-2023 surveys about this metric
See all Economy data →
Housing
Housing

Typical home value

No better direction Falling recently, faster than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Home value fell about 5% over the 12 months ending June 2026, faster than 100% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: home value fell about 5% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 100% of similar-size cities.
Longer view: home value rose about 6% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: $507,622 in June 2026, down from $534,465 a year earlier.
$507,622
2000June 2026
Compare all 10 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Texas ref $302,999 (Jun 26) -1.9%
United States ref $372,995 (Jun 26) +0.8%
San Francisco, CA $1,395,852 (Jun 26) 2nd +9.5% 1st 175% above peers
Columbus, OH $251,291 (Jun 26) 10th -0.9% 2nd 50% below peers
Charlotte, NC $399,434 (Jun 26) 6th -1.1% 3rd 21% below peers
San Jose, CA $1,413,804 (Jun 26) 1st -1.8% 4th 179% above peers
Jacksonville, FL $287,871 (Jun 26) 9th -1.8% 5th 43% below peers
Fort Worth, TX $300,035 (Jun 26) 8th -2.2% 6th 41% below peers
Seattle, WA $856,052 (Jun 26) 3rd -2.2% 7th 69% above peers
Dallas, TX $311,326 (Jun 26) 7th -2.7% 8th 39% below peers
Denver, CO $538,992 (Jun 26) 4th -3.4% 9th 6% above peers
Austin, TX $507,622 (Jun 26) 5th -5.0% 10th on par with peers
Housing

Starter home value (bottom tier)

No better direction Falling recently, faster than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Starter homes fell about 6% over the 12 months ending June 2026, faster than 100% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: starter homes fell about 6% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 100% of similar-size cities.
Longer view: starter homes rose about 7% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: $337,472 in June 2026, down from $358,539 a year earlier.
$337,472
2000June 2026
Compare all 10 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Texas ref $185,570 (Jun 26) -0.5%
United States ref $202,486 (Jun 26) +2.0%
San Francisco, CA $913,649 (Jun 26) 2nd +6.6% 1st 171% above peers
Columbus, OH $168,661 (Jun 26) 10th -0.9% 2nd 50% below peers
Charlotte, NC $291,086 (Jun 26) 6th -1.2% 3rd 14% below peers
Fort Worth, TX $211,166 (Jun 26) 7th -2.2% 4th 37% below peers
Seattle, WA $564,373 (Jun 26) 3rd -2.4% 5th 67% above peers
Jacksonville, FL $178,651 (Jun 26) 9th -2.9% 6th 47% below peers
San Jose, CA $928,894 (Jun 26) 1st -3.0% 7th 175% above peers
Dallas, TX $189,277 (Jun 26) 8th -3.7% 8th 44% below peers
Denver, CO $360,685 (Jun 26) 4th -4.5% 9th 7% above peers
Austin, TX $337,472 (Jun 26) 5th -5.9% 10th on par with peers
Housing

Homeownership rate

▲ Higher is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Homeownership fell 1.7 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 45.1% to 43.4% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.8pp). 4 of the 10 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 7 of 10 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: homeownership fell 1.4 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (44.9% to 43.5%).
43.4%
20112024
Compare all 11 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Texas ref 62.6% +0.6pp
United States ref 65.2%
Indianapolis, IN 56.0% 3rd +2.9pp 1st 15% above peers
Dallas, TX 42.4% 10th +1.6pp 2nd 13% below peers
Jacksonville, FL 57.6% 1st +1.5pp 3rd 18% above peers
San Francisco, CA 38.2% 11th +0.6pp 4th 22% below peers
Fort Worth, TX 57.0% 2nd -0.4pp 5th 17% above peers
Columbus, OH 44.1% 7th -0.6pp 6th 9% below peers
San Jose, CA 55.8% 4th -1.0pp 7th 14% above peers
Denver, CO 48.8% 6th -1.1pp 8th on par with peers
Charlotte, NC 51.0% 5th -1.9pp 9th 5% above peers
Austin, TX 43.5% 9th -1.7pp 10th 11% below peers
Seattle, WA 43.7% 8th -2.0pp 11th 10% below peers
Where is this changing? 219 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHomeownership rate
Loading tract map…
134 of 219 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.7pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Housing

Typical asking rent

No better direction Falling recently, faster than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Rent fell about 2% over the 12 months ending June 2026, faster than 100% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: rent fell about 3% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 100% of similar-size cities.
Longer view: rent rose about 3% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: $1,615 in June 2026, down from $1,647 a year earlier.
$1,615
2015June 2026
Compare all 10 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
United States ref $1,965 (Jun 26) +2.2%
San Francisco, CA $4,401 (Jun 26) 1st +20.4% 1st 152% above peers
San Jose, CA $3,479 (Jun 26) 2nd +5.3% 2nd 99% above peers
Columbus, OH $1,456 (Jun 26) 10th +1.1% 3rd 17% below peers
Jacksonville, FL $1,600 (Jun 26) 9th +1.0% 4th 8% below peers
Seattle, WA $2,224 (Jun 26) 3rd +0.4% 5th 27% above peers
Dallas, TX $1,618 (Jun 26) 7th +0.3% 6th 7% below peers
Fort Worth, TX $1,635 (Jun 26) 6th +0.3% 7th 6% below peers
Charlotte, NC $1,746 (Jun 26) 5th +0.2% 8th on par with peers
Denver, CO $1,877 (Jun 26) 4th -1.4% 9th 8% above peers
Austin, TX $1,615 (Jun 26) 8th -2.0% 10th 8% below peers
Housing

Housing cost-burdened households

▼ Lower is better Turning up (early signal)
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Cost burden changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (36.2% then, 37.2% now; margin ±1.1pp). The newest releases lean upward: each of the last 4 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 8 of 10 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: cost burden fell 2.8 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (40.0% to 37.2%).
37.2%
20102024
Compare all 11 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Texas ref 33.1% +2.6pp
United States ref 32.2% +0.4pp
Indianapolis, IN 32.9% 1st -1.8pp 1st 9% below peers
San Jose, CA 37.5% 8th -1.0pp 2nd 4% above peers
Seattle, WA 34.5% 2nd -0.5pp 3rd 4% below peers
Denver, CO 36.1% 6th +0.7pp 4th on par with peers
Austin, TX 37.2% 7th +1.0pp 5th 3% above peers
Columbus, OH 34.9% 3rd +1.6pp 6th 3% below peers
San Francisco, CA 35.6% 5th +1.7pp 7th 1% below peers
Charlotte, NC 34.9% 4th +1.9pp 8th 3% below peers
Dallas, TX 40.5% 11th +2.6pp 9th 12% above peers
Jacksonville, FL 37.7% 9th +3.1pp 10th 4% above peers
Fort Worth, TX 37.8% 10th +4.4pp 11th 5% above peers
Where is this changing? 219 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHousing cost-burdened households
Loading tract map…
134 of 219 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Santa Ana, CA down 4.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Newark, NJ down 4.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
  • San Juan zona urbana, PR down 2.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 96% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (tables B25070 + B25091) through 2024 ±0.9pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys *Early signal: consecutive releases agree on direction only; the size of the newest movement is not measurable from overlapping surveys. about this metric
Housing

Households without a vehicle

▼ Lower is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →

No vehicle rose 0.9 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 6.2% to 7.1% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.5pp). That reverses the previous span, which went down between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys. 2 of the 10 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 5 of 10 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: no vehicle rose 0.4 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (6.7% to 7.1%).
7.1%
20102024
Compare all 11 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Texas ref 5.4% +0.2pp
United States ref 8.3% -0.3pp
Indianapolis, IN 8.4% 6th -0.9pp 1st on par with peers
Jacksonville, FL 7.3% 5th -0.6pp 2nd 13% below peers
Dallas, TX 8.8% 8th -0.5pp 3rd 5% above peers
Columbus, OH 8.5% 7th -0.4pp 4th 1% above peers
San Francisco, CA 30.2% 11th -0.7pp 5th 259% above peers
Fort Worth, TX 5.5% 1st -0.0pp 6th 35% below peers
Charlotte, NC 6.4% 3rd +0.0pp 7th 24% below peers
Denver, CO 10.3% 9th +0.5pp 8th 23% above peers
Seattle, WA 19.0% 10th +1.2pp 9th 125% above peers
Austin, TX 7.1% 4th +0.9pp 10th 16% below peers
San Jose, CA 6.1% 2nd +0.9pp 11th 27% below peers
Where is this changing? 219 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHouseholds without a vehicle
Loading tract map…
134 of 219 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 2 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Riverside, CA down 1.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Mesa, AZ down 1.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 95% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Colorado Springs, CO down 0.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 90% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B08201) through 2024 ±0.4pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Housing data →
Health
Health

People without health insurance

▼ Lower is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Uninsured fell 1.2 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 13.5% to 12.3% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.5pp). 5 of the 10 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 6 of 10 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: uninsured fell 7.2 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (19.6% to 12.3%).
12.3%
20122024
Compare all 11 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Texas ref 16.2% -0.3pp
United States ref 8.2% -0.4pp
Indianapolis, IN 8.7% 4th -1.6pp 1st 15% below peers
San Francisco, CA 3.3% 1st -0.4pp 2nd 68% below peers
Austin, TX 12.3% 8th -1.2pp 3rd 20% above peers
San Jose, CA 4.8% 3rd -0.4pp 4th 53% below peers
Jacksonville, FL 10.9% 7th -0.8pp 5th 7% above peers
Dallas, TX 22.6% 11th -0.8pp 6th 120% above peers
Denver, CO 8.9% 5th -0.3pp 7th 13% below peers
Seattle, WA 4.2% 2nd +0.0pp 8th 60% below peers
Fort Worth, TX 18.4% 10th +0.2pp 9th 79% above peers
Charlotte, NC 12.8% 9th +0.3pp 10th 25% above peers
Columbus, OH 10.2% 6th +1.3pp 11th on par with peers
Where is this changing? 219 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthPeople without health insurance
Loading tract map…
133 of 219 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 1 has too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Santa Ana, CA down 3.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 96% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Anaheim, CA down 2.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 88% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Miami, FL down 3.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 87% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.4pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Health

Adult obesity

▼ Lower is better Level only
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Adult obesity is somewhat below the peer median.

29.2%
20202022
Compare all 11 similar-size cities best first
Place Latest Today's rank History Latest vs. peers
Texas ref 36.8%
United States ref 33.4%
San Francisco, CA 18.2% 1st 46% below peers
San Jose, CA 23.2% 2nd 31% below peers
Denver, CO 23.2% 3rd 31% below peers
Seattle, WA 23.4% 4th 31% below peers
Austin, TX 29.2% 5th 13% below peers
Jacksonville, FL 33.7% 6th on par with peers
Charlotte, NC 34.3% 7th 2% above peers
Dallas, TX 36.0% 8th 7% above peers
Columbus, OH 38.4% 9th 14% above peers
Indianapolis, IN 39.5% 10th 17% above peers
Fort Worth, TX 39.7% 11th 18% above peers
CDC PLACES through 2022 modeled tract map about this metric
Health

Children without health insurance

▼ Lower is better Turning up (early signal)
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Child uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (8.9% then, 9.6% now; margin ±1.1pp). The newest releases lean upward: each of the last 3 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 8 of 10 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: child uninsured fell 0.6 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (10.2% to 9.6%).
9.6%
20122024
Compare all 11 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Texas ref 12.0% +1.2pp
United States ref 5.5% +0.4pp
San Jose, CA 1.8% 1st -0.3pp 1st 74% below peers
Indianapolis, IN 5.2% 4th -0.9pp 2nd 23% below peers
Jacksonville, FL 7.0% 7th +0.2pp 3rd 4% above peers
Austin, TX 9.6% 9th +0.6pp 4th 43% above peers
Dallas, TX 16.3% 11th +1.4pp 5th 143% above peers
Fort Worth, TX 13.5% 10th +1.8pp 6th 102% above peers
Columbus, OH 6.7% 6th +1.3pp 7th on par with peers
Denver, CO 5.7% 5th +1.5pp 8th 15% below peers
Charlotte, NC 8.7% 8th +2.3pp 9th 30% above peers
Seattle, WA 1.9% 2nd +0.5pp 10th 71% below peers
San Francisco, CA 2.2% 3rd +0.7pp 11th 67% below peers
Where is this changing? 219 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthChildren without health insurance
Loading tract map…
133 of 219 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 4 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

1
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Mesa, AZ down 1.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 88% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B27001) through 2024 ±1.0pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys *Early signal: consecutive releases agree on direction only; the size of the newest movement is not measurable from overlapping surveys. about this metric
See all Health data →
Education
Education

Adults with a bachelor's degree or higher

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

College attainment rose 7.8 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 51.7% to 59.6% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.0pp). 10 of the 10 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the stronger third of similar-size cities and kept improving; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 10 of 10 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: college attainment rose 13.6 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (46.0% to 59.6%).
59.6%
20102024
Compare all 11 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Texas ref 33.8% +3.9pp
United States ref 35.7% +3.5pp
Jacksonville, FL 33.2% 10th +4.6pp 1st 30% below peers
Austin, TX 59.6% 3rd +7.8pp 2nd 26% above peers
Dallas, TX 38.2% 7th +4.9pp 3rd 19% below peers
Denver, CO 56.5% 4th +7.1pp 4th 20% above peers
Indianapolis, IN 34.9% 9th +4.0pp 5th 26% below peers
Charlotte, NC 48.0% 5th +3.7pp 6th 1% above peers
San Jose, CA 47.3% 6th +3.6pp 7th on par with peers
Fort Worth, TX 32.0% 11th +2.4pp 8th 32% below peers
Seattle, WA 68.5% 1st +4.4pp 9th 45% above peers
Columbus, OH 38.2% 8th +1.6pp 10th 19% below peers
San Francisco, CA 60.3% 2nd +2.3pp 11th 28% above peers
Where is this changing? 219 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationAdults with a bachelor's degree or higher
Loading tract map…
133 of 219 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 1 has too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.8pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Education

Children ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool

▲ Higher is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Preschool enrollment changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (53.8% then, 51.8% now; margin ±4.5pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 3 of 10 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: preschool enrollment rose 7.2 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (44.7% to 51.8%).
51.8%
20112024
Compare all 11 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Texas ref 43.3% +0.1pp
United States ref 45.5%
Dallas, TX 47.0% 6th +4.2pp 1st on par with peers
Seattle, WA 70.3% 2nd +1.0pp 2nd 50% above peers
Fort Worth, TX 39.0% 10th +0.1pp 3rd 17% below peers
Indianapolis, IN 41.2% 8th -0.4pp 4th 12% below peers
San Francisco, CA 73.2% 1st -1.3pp 5th 56% above peers
Austin, TX 51.8% 5th -1.9pp 6th 10% above peers
San Jose, CA 54.3% 3rd -2.5pp 7th 15% above peers
Denver, CO 52.5% 4th -3.2pp 8th 12% above peers
Jacksonville, FL 41.1% 9th -2.5pp 9th 13% below peers
Charlotte, NC 42.5% 7th -5.1pp 10th 10% below peers
Columbus, OH 33.8% 11th -5.7pp 11th 28% below peers
Where is this changing? 219 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationChildren ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool
Loading tract map…
126 of 219 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 21 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±3.7pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Education

Teens not in school and not working

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Disconnected youth changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (6.0% then, 5.5% now; margin ±1.7pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 2 of 10 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: disconnected youth fell 0.6 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (6.2% to 5.5%).
5.5%
20102024
Compare all 11 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Texas ref 8.2% +0.4pp
United States ref 6.9% +0.3pp
Indianapolis, IN 7.8% 7th -1.3pp 1st 4% above peers
Austin, TX 5.5% 4th -0.5pp 2nd 27% below peers
Seattle, WA 3.1% 2nd -0.2pp 3rd 58% below peers
Denver, CO 8.4% 8th -0.4pp 4th 11% above peers
Dallas, TX 10.1% 10th -0.1pp 5th 33% above peers
Fort Worth, TX 7.5% 6th +0.3pp 6th on par with peers
San Francisco, CA 3.0% 1st +0.2pp 7th 61% below peers
San Jose, CA 3.8% 3rd +0.3pp 8th 50% below peers
Jacksonville, FL 10.3% 11th +1.3pp 9th 36% above peers
Columbus, OH 7.1% 5th +1.6pp 10th 6% below peers
Charlotte, NC 8.6% 9th +2.7pp 11th 14% above peers
Where is this changing? 219 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationTeens not in school and not working
Loading tract map…
132 of 219 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 7 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

1
Cities of similar size (250k-1m) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Chandler, AZ down 3.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B14005) through 2024 ±1.4pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Education data →
Demographics
Demographics

Population

No better direction Rising
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Population rose about 3% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 950,807 to 979,539 - more than the combined survey margin (±519). 6 of the 10 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.

Rising beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 8 of 10 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: population rose about 13% from 2014 to 2024 (864,218 to 979,539).
979,539
20102024
Compare all 11 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Fort Worth, TX 963,194 5th +10% 1st 5% above peers
Jacksonville, FL 977,670 4th +10% 2nd 7% above peers
Charlotte, NC 903,844 7th +5% 3rd 1% below peers
Seattle, WA 754,195 10th +4% 4th 18% below peers
Columbus, OH 914,802 6th +4% 5th on par with peers
Austin, TX 979,539 3rd +3% 6th 7% above peers
Indianapolis, IN 885,860 8th +2% 7th 3% below peers
Denver, CO 718,877 11th +2% 8th 21% below peers
Dallas, TX 1,307,930 1st -2% 9th 43% above peers
San Jose, CA 990,138 2nd -4% 10th 8% above peers
San Francisco, CA 830,235 9th -5% 11th 9% below peers
Where is this changing? 219 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsPopulation
Loading tract map…
133 of 219 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±484 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Children's share of the population

No better direction Falling
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Children fell 2.4 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 20.4% to 18.0% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.4pp). 8 of the 10 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.

Falling beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 8 of 10 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: children fell 3.2 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (21.2% to 18.0%).
18.0%
20172024
Compare all 11 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Texas ref 24.1% -1.2pp
United States ref 21.6% -0.7pp
San Francisco, CA 13.7% 11th +0.2pp 1st 38% below peers
Indianapolis, IN 24.8% 2nd +0.2pp 2nd 13% above peers
Jacksonville, FL 22.6% 5th -0.3pp 3rd 3% above peers
Columbus, OH 22.0% 6th -0.5pp 4th on par with peers
Charlotte, NC 22.7% 4th -1.0pp 5th 3% above peers
Dallas, TX 23.9% 3rd -1.1pp 6th 9% above peers
Fort Worth, TX 26.4% 1st -1.3pp 7th 20% above peers
Seattle, WA 13.8% 10th -1.3pp 8th 37% below peers
San Jose, CA 20.5% 7th -2.0pp 9th 7% below peers
Denver, CO 18.0% 8th -1.8pp 10th 18% below peers
Austin, TX 18.0% 9th -2.4pp 11th 18% below peers
Where is this changing? 219 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren's share of the population
Loading tract map…
133 of 219 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 1 has too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.3pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Children in single-parent families

No better direction No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Single-parent changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (28.0% then, 26.9% now; margin ±2.5pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 2 of 10 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: single-parent fell 7.3 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (34.1% to 26.9%).
26.9%
20102024
Compare all 11 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Texas ref 29.6% -0.3pp
United States ref 29.9% -0.2pp
San Jose, CA 22.6% 9th +1.6pp 1st 28% below peers
San Francisco, CA 21.4% 10th +0.6pp 2nd 32% below peers
Denver, CO 30.9% 7th +0.3pp 3rd 2% below peers
Charlotte, NC 36.4% 5th -0.0pp 4th 15% above peers
Jacksonville, FL 39.3% 2nd -0.8pp 5th 25% above peers
Dallas, TX 39.2% 4th -0.9pp 6th 24% above peers
Columbus, OH 45.0% 1st -1.1pp 7th 43% above peers
Austin, TX 26.9% 8th -1.1pp 8th 15% below peers
Fort Worth, TX 31.5% 6th -1.4pp 9th on par with peers
Seattle, WA 21.1% 11th -1.0pp 10th 33% below peers
Indianapolis, IN 39.3% 3rd -4.9pp 11th 25% above peers
Where is this changing? 219 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren in single-parent families
Loading tract map…
129 of 219 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 8 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B09002) through 2024 ±2.1pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Young children with all parents in the labor force

No better direction Rising
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Working parents rose 6.7 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 61.9% to 68.6% - more than the combined survey margin (±4.1pp). 3 of the 10 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.

Rising beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 3 of 10 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: working parents rose 7.2 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (61.4% to 68.6%).
68.6%
20102024
Compare all 11 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Texas ref 63.7% +3.2pp
United States ref 68.1% +1.9pp
San Jose, CA 74.6% 1st +9.8pp 1st 7% above peers
Fort Worth, TX 67.7% 9th +7.7pp 2nd 3% below peers
Austin, TX 68.6% 8th +6.7pp 3rd 1% below peers
Denver, CO 69.9% 5th +3.8pp 4th 1% above peers
Seattle, WA 72.9% 3rd +3.8pp 5th 5% above peers
Indianapolis, IN 70.8% 4th +1.4pp 6th 2% above peers
Dallas, TX 61.3% 11th +1.2pp 7th 12% below peers
San Francisco, CA 73.9% 2nd +0.8pp 8th 6% above peers
Charlotte, NC 68.8% 7th +0.5pp 9th 1% below peers
Jacksonville, FL 66.3% 10th -0.1pp 10th 5% below peers
Columbus, OH 69.5% 6th -2.2pp 11th on par with peers
Where is this changing? 219 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsYoung children with all parents in the labor force
Loading tract map…
127 of 219 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 12 have too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B23008) through 2024 ±3.4pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Demographics data →