This badge answers one question: can this city's own trend be trusted as a real improvement? It passed all three checks, so yes. The most recent 12 months agree with the multi-year trend.
Violent crime fell about 19% over the 12 months ending May 2026, faster than 90% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 456 (Apr 26) | -9.3% | |||
| San Jose, CA | 456 (May 26) | -20.5% | 1st | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 350 (May 26) | -18.6% | 2nd | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 593 (May 26) | -16.9% | 3rd | ||
| Columbus, OH | 355 (Apr 26) | -15.3% | 4th | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 462 (May 26) | -13.5% | 5th | ||
| Denver, CO | 829 (May 26) | -11.9% | 6th | ||
| Indianapolis, IN | 644 (May 26) | -10.6% | 7th | ||
| Dallas, TX | 567 (May 26) | -9.1% | 8th | ||
| Austin, TX | 409 (May 26) | -2.8% | 9th | ||
| Seattle, WA | 657 (May 26) | +0.1% | 10th | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 688 (May 26) | +1.6% | 11th |
This badge answers one question: can this city's own trend be trusted as a real improvement? It passed all three checks, so yes. Most of the selected peers are improving faster than this city. The most recent 12 months agree with the multi-year trend.
Property crime fell about 19% over the 12 months ending May 2026, faster than 90% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 1,987 (Apr 26) | -12.2% | |||
| San Francisco, CA | 2,639 (May 26) | -21.6% | 1st | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 2,092 (May 26) | -18.5% | 2nd | ||
| Indianapolis, IN | 2,611 (May 26) | -14.0% | 3rd | ||
| Denver, CO | 3,984 (May 26) | -11.9% | 4th | ||
| Columbus, OH | 2,432 (Apr 26) | -9.4% | 5th | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 3,577 (May 26) | -9.0% | 6th | ||
| San Jose, CA | 2,293 (May 26) | -8.9% | 7th | ||
| Seattle, WA | 4,629 (May 26) | -7.8% | 8th | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 2,604 (May 26) | -5.8% | 9th | ||
| Austin, TX | 2,942 (May 26) | -4.4% | 10th | ||
| Dallas, TX | 3,035 (May 26) | -3.6% | 11th |
The last 12 months moved in the better direction. The multi-year trend has not (yet) passed the checks below, so no sustained-improvement claim is made. It is also improving faster than most of the selected peers.
Homicides fell about 22% over the 12 months ending May 2026, faster than 82% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 6 (Apr 26) | -17.8% | |||
| Seattle, WA | 4 (May 26) | -34.1% | 1st | ||
| Columbus, OH | 8 (Apr 26) | -28.2% | 2nd | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 6 (May 26) | -21.6% | 3rd | ||
| Indianapolis, IN | 14 (May 26) | -16.2% | 4th | ||
| Austin, TX | 5 (May 26) | -12.2% | 5th | ||
| Dallas, TX | 10 (May 26) | -11.1% | 6th | ||
| Denver, CO | 7 (May 26) | -10.9% | 7th | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 10 (May 26) | -8.1% | 8th | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 10 (May 26) | -1.0% | 9th | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 4 (May 26) | +0.0% | 10th | ||
| San Jose, CA | 2 (May 26) | +9.5% | 11th | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 7 (May 26) | +13.9% | 12th |
The last 12 months moved in the better direction. The multi-year trend has not (yet) passed the checks below, so no sustained-improvement claim is made. It is also improving faster than most of the selected peers.
Vehicle theft fell about 34% over the 12 months ending May 2026, faster than 80% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latestper 100k | Changelast 12 months | Sig. | Change rank | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. (RTCI sample) ref | 303 (Apr 26) | -22.2% | |||
| San Francisco, CA | 327 (May 26) | -39.0% | 1st | ||
| Denver, CO | 660 (May 26) | -36.4% | 2nd | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 307 (May 26) | -33.6% | 3rd | ||
| Dallas, TX | 738 (May 26) | -25.0% | 4th | ||
| Indianapolis, IN | 498 (May 26) | -22.8% | 5th | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 548 (May 26) | -22.0% | 6th | ||
| Austin, TX | 382 (May 26) | -21.0% | 7th | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 277 (May 26) | -17.7% | 8th | ||
| Seattle, WA | 705 (May 26) | -15.9% | 9th | ||
| San Jose, CA | 486 (May 26) | -12.5% | 10th | ||
| Columbus, OH | 504 (Apr 26) | -7.7% | 11th |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Household income rose about 28% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from $62,187 to $79,507 (each survey's own dollars, not adjusted for inflation) - more than the combined survey margin (±$1,210). 11 of the 11 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started mid-pack and has reached a genuinely better level; worth investigating.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas ref | $78,476 | +27% | |||||
| United States ref | $80,734 | +28% | |||||
| Indianapolis, IN | $66,219 | 11th | +38% | 1st | 19% below peers | ||
| Denver, CO | $94,718 | 4th | +38% | 2nd | 15% above peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | $123,860 | 3rd | +34% | 3rd | 51% above peers | ||
| Dallas, TX | $70,518 | 8th | +34% | 4th | 14% below peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | $146,427 | 1st | +34% | 5th | 78% above peers | ||
| Austin, TX | $93,658 | 5th | +31% | 6th | 14% above peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | $82,068 | 6th | +31% | 7th | on par with peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | $79,507 | 7th | +28% | 8th | 3% below peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | $69,872 | 9th | +28% | 9th | 15% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | $140,970 | 2nd | +25% | 10th | 72% above peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | $68,656 | 10th | +24% | 11th | 16% below peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | $66,082 | 12th | +23% | 12th | 19% below peers |
The most recent 12 months moved against the better direction, whatever the longer window shows. The checks below judge the multi-year window.
Unemployment rose 0.3 percentage points over the 12 months ending May 2026, faster than 55% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas ref | 4.3% (May 26) | +0.2pp | ||||
| United States ref | 4.2% (Jun 26) | +0.1pp | ||||
| Columbus, OH | 2.8% (May 26) | 1st | -1.6pp | 1st | 26% below peers | |
| San Jose, CA | 3.5% (May 26) | 5th | -0.5pp | 2nd | 8% below peers | |
| San Francisco, CA | 3.3% (May 26) | 2nd | -0.5pp | 3rd | 13% below peers | |
| Indianapolis, IN | 3.3% (May 26) | 3rd | -0.4pp | 4th | 13% below peers | |
| Denver, CO | 3.8% (May 26) | 7th | -0.2pp | 5th | on par with peers | |
| Charlotte, NC | 3.6% (May 26) | 6th | -0.2pp | 6th | 5% below peers | |
| Fort Worth, TX | 4.1% (May 26) | 8th | +0.3pp | 7th | 8% above peers | |
| Austin, TX | 3.4% (May 26) | 4th | +0.3pp | 8th | 11% below peers | |
| Dallas, TX | 4.1% (May 26) | 9th | +0.3pp | 9th | 8% above peers | |
| Seattle, WA | 4.5% (May 26) | 11th | +0.7pp | 10th | 18% above peers | |
| Jacksonville, FL | 4.7% (May 26) | 12th | +0.9pp | 11th | 24% above peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 4.2% (May 26) | 10th | +1.3pp | 12th | 11% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Poverty fell 1.4 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 14.2% to 12.9% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.8pp). 9 of the 11 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started mid-pack and has reached a genuinely better level; worth investigating.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas ref | 13.0% | -1.0pp | |||||
| United States ref | 12.0% | ||||||
| Denver, CO | 11.1% | 4th | -1.6pp | 1st | 14% below peers | ||
| Indianapolis, IN | 15.5% | 10th | -2.1pp | 2nd | 21% above peers | ||
| Dallas, TX | 16.5% | 11th | -2.2pp | 3rd | 28% above peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 9.6% | 2nd | -1.1pp | 4th | 25% below peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 12.9% | 7th | -1.4pp | 5th | on par with peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 11.7% | 6th | -1.2pp | 6th | 9% below peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 11.5% | 5th | -1.2pp | 7th | 11% below peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 17.7% | 12th | -1.3pp | 8th | 37% above peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 8.0% | 1st | -0.6pp | 9th | 38% below peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 14.9% | 9th | -0.9pp | 10th | 16% above peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 14.2% | 8th | -0.3pp | 11th | 10% above peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 11.0% | 3rd | +0.8pp | 12th | 15% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Child poverty fell 2.3 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 20.0% to 17.7% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.1pp). 10 of the 11 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started mid-pack and has reached a genuinely better level; worth investigating.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas ref | 18.7% | -2.3pp | |||||
| United States ref | 16.1% | ||||||
| Dallas, TX | 24.3% | 11th | -5.0pp | 1st | 37% above peers | ||
| Indianapolis, IN | 22.4% | 10th | -4.4pp | 2nd | 27% above peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 15.1% | 4th | -2.8pp | 3rd | 15% below peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 9.3% | 3rd | -1.6pp | 4th | 47% below peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 20.4% | 9th | -3.4pp | 5th | 15% above peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 8.2% | 1st | -1.2pp | 6th | 54% below peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 16.0% | 5th | -2.2pp | 7th | 10% below peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 17.7% | 7th | -2.3pp | 8th | on par with peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 26.0% | 12th | -3.3pp | 9th | 47% above peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 19.6% | 8th | -2.4pp | 10th | 11% above peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 16.8% | 6th | -1.7pp | 11th | 5% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 9.0% | 2nd | -0.9pp | 12th | 49% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
Broadband rose 8.0 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 84.3% to 92.3% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.6pp). 11 of the 11 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started mid-pack and has reached a genuinely better level; worth investigating.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas ref | 91.4% | +9.3pp | |||||
| United States ref | 91.1% | ||||||
| Dallas, TX | 91.0% | 11th | +14.1pp | 1st | 2% below peers | ||
| Indianapolis, IN | 91.9% | 10th | +12.6pp | 2nd | 1% below peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 92.1% | 9th | +9.0pp | 3rd | 1% below peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 92.3% | 8th | +8.0pp | 4th | 1% below peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 93.6% | 5th | +7.6pp | 5th | 1% above peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 91.0% | 12th | +7.1pp | 6th | 2% below peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 93.8% | 3rd | +6.2pp | 7th | 1% above peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 93.7% | 4th | +6.2pp | 8th | 1% above peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 93.0% | 7th | +6.1pp | 9th | on par with peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 93.1% | 6th | +5.3pp | 10th | on par with peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 95.5% | 1st | +4.1pp | 11th | 3% above peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 94.5% | 2nd | +3.9pp | 12th | 2% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Inequality changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (0.46 then, 0.45 now; margin ±0.01).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas ref | 0.48 | -0.001 | |||||
| United States ref | 0.48 | +0.001 | |||||
| Indianapolis, IN | 0.47 | 5th | -0.018 | 1st | 4% below peers | ||
| Dallas, TX | 0.53 | 12th | -0.012 | 2nd | 8% above peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 0.45 | 2nd | -0.005 | 3rd | 7% below peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 0.47 | 6th | -0.004 | 4th | 3% below peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 0.49 | 9th | -0.000 | 5th | 1% above peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 0.49 | 7th | +0.002 | 6th | on par with peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 0.47 | 4th | +0.002 | 7th | 4% below peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 0.45 | 1st | +0.003 | 8th | 8% below peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 0.49 | 8th | +0.004 | 9th | 1% above peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 0.50 | 10th | +0.004 | 10th | 3% above peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 0.52 | 11th | +0.012 | 11th | 7% above peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 0.46 | 3rd | +0.012 | 12th | 5% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
SNAP fell 1.8 percentage points between the 2014-2018 and 2019-2023 surveys, from 14.1% to 12.3% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.7pp). 8 of the 11 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
| Place | Latest2019-2023 survey | Today's rank | Change2014-2018 → 2019-2023 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas ref | 11.4% | -0.8pp | |||||
| United States ref | 11.8% | -0.5pp | |||||
| Austin, TX | 6.2% | 1st | -1.9pp | 1st | 48% below peers | ||
| Indianapolis, IN | 12.4% | 9th | -2.5pp | 2nd | 6% above peers | ||
| Dallas, TX | 11.7% | 7th | -2.3pp | 3rd | on par with peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 12.8% | 10th | -2.5pp | 4th | 9% above peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 14.6% | 12th | -2.2pp | 5th | 24% above peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 12.3% | 8th | -1.8pp | 6th | 5% above peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 9.8% | 6th | -1.4pp | 7th | 17% below peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 7.5% | 2nd | -1.0pp | 8th | 36% below peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 8.3% | 4th | -0.7pp | 9th | 29% below peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 13.7% | 11th | +0.5pp | 10th | 17% above peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 7.8% | 3rd | +1.3pp | 11th | 34% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 9.7% | 5th | +5.0pp | 12th | 17% below peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers.
Home value fell about 2% over the 12 months ending June 2026, faster than 60% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas ref | $302,999 (Jun 26) | -1.9% | ||||
| United States ref | $372,995 (Jun 26) | +0.8% | ||||
| San Francisco, CA | $1,395,852 (Jun 26) | 2nd | +9.5% | 1st | 249% above peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | $209,490 (Jun 26) | 11th | -0.3% | 2nd | 48% below peers | |
| Columbus, OH | $251,291 (Jun 26) | 10th | -0.9% | 3rd | 37% below peers | |
| Charlotte, NC | $399,434 (Jun 26) | 6th | -1.1% | 4th | on par with peers | |
| San Jose, CA | $1,413,804 (Jun 26) | 1st | -1.8% | 5th | 254% above peers | |
| Jacksonville, FL | $287,871 (Jun 26) | 9th | -1.8% | 6th | 28% below peers | |
| Fort Worth, TX | $300,035 (Jun 26) | 8th | -2.2% | 7th | 25% below peers | |
| Seattle, WA | $856,052 (Jun 26) | 3rd | -2.2% | 8th | 114% above peers | |
| Dallas, TX | $311,326 (Jun 26) | 7th | -2.7% | 9th | 22% below peers | |
| Denver, CO | $538,992 (Jun 26) | 4th | -3.4% | 10th | 35% above peers | |
| Austin, TX | $507,622 (Jun 26) | 5th | -5.0% | 11th | 27% above peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge reports the last 12 months' movement and its speed next to the selected peers.
Starter homes fell about 2% over the 12 months ending June 2026, slower than 60% of similar-size cities.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas ref | $185,570 (Jun 26) | -0.5% | ||||
| United States ref | $202,486 (Jun 26) | +2.0% | ||||
| San Francisco, CA | $913,649 (Jun 26) | 2nd | +6.6% | 1st | 214% above peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | $127,849 (Jun 26) | 11th | -0.4% | 2nd | 56% below peers | |
| Columbus, OH | $168,661 (Jun 26) | 10th | -0.9% | 3rd | 42% below peers | |
| Charlotte, NC | $291,086 (Jun 26) | 6th | -1.2% | 4th | on par with peers | |
| Fort Worth, TX | $211,166 (Jun 26) | 7th | -2.2% | 5th | 27% below peers | |
| Seattle, WA | $564,373 (Jun 26) | 3rd | -2.4% | 6th | 94% above peers | |
| Jacksonville, FL | $178,651 (Jun 26) | 9th | -2.9% | 7th | 39% below peers | |
| San Jose, CA | $928,894 (Jun 26) | 1st | -3.0% | 8th | 219% above peers | |
| Dallas, TX | $189,277 (Jun 26) | 8th | -3.7% | 9th | 35% below peers | |
| Denver, CO | $360,685 (Jun 26) | 4th | -4.5% | 10th | 24% above peers | |
| Austin, TX | $337,472 (Jun 26) | 5th | -5.9% | 11th | 16% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Homeownership changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (57.4% then, 57.0% now; margin ±1.0pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas ref | 62.6% | +0.6pp | |||||
| United States ref | 65.2% | ||||||
| Indianapolis, IN | 56.0% | 4th | +2.9pp | 1st | 10% above peers | ||
| Dallas, TX | 42.4% | 11th | +1.6pp | 2nd | 17% below peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 57.6% | 2nd | +1.5pp | 3rd | 13% above peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 38.2% | 12th | +0.6pp | 4th | 25% below peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 58.5% | 1st | -0.4pp | 5th | 15% above peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 57.0% | 3rd | -0.4pp | 6th | 12% above peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 44.1% | 8th | -0.6pp | 7th | 13% below peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 55.8% | 5th | -1.0pp | 8th | 9% above peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 48.8% | 7th | -1.1pp | 9th | 4% below peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 51.0% | 6th | -1.9pp | 10th | on par with peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 43.5% | 10th | -1.7pp | 11th | 15% below peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 43.7% | 9th | -2.0pp | 12th | 14% below peers |
This metric has no declared better direction; the badge only reports which way it is moving and how fast next to the selected peers. Most of the selected peers are rising faster.
Rent was essentially flat over the 12 months ending June 2026.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | Changelast 12 months | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States ref | $1,965 (Jun 26) | +2.2% | ||||
| San Francisco, CA | $4,401 (Jun 26) | 1st | +20.4% | 1st | 169% above peers | |
| San Jose, CA | $3,479 (Jun 26) | 2nd | +5.3% | 2nd | 113% above peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | $1,298 (Jun 26) | 11th | +3.2% | 3rd | 21% below peers | |
| Columbus, OH | $1,456 (Jun 26) | 10th | +1.1% | 4th | 11% below peers | |
| Jacksonville, FL | $1,600 (Jun 26) | 9th | +1.0% | 5th | 2% below peers | |
| Seattle, WA | $2,224 (Jun 26) | 3rd | +0.4% | 6th | 36% above peers | |
| Dallas, TX | $1,618 (Jun 26) | 7th | +0.3% | 7th | 1% below peers | |
| Fort Worth, TX | $1,635 (Jun 26) | 6th | +0.3% | 8th | on par with peers | |
| Charlotte, NC | $1,746 (Jun 26) | 5th | +0.2% | 9th | 7% above peers | |
| Denver, CO | $1,877 (Jun 26) | 4th | -1.4% | 10th | 15% above peers | |
| Austin, TX | $1,615 (Jun 26) | 8th | -2.0% | 11th | 1% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin, in the wrong direction for this metric.
Cost burden rose 4.4 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 33.4% to 37.8% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.2pp). That reverses the previous span, which went down between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys. 6 of the 11 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas ref | 33.1% | +2.6pp | |||||
| United States ref | 32.2% | +0.4pp | |||||
| Indianapolis, IN | 32.9% | 2nd | -1.8pp | 1st | 9% below peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 37.5% | 9th | -1.0pp | 2nd | 4% above peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 34.5% | 3rd | -0.5pp | 3rd | 4% below peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 36.1% | 7th | +0.7pp | 4th | on par with peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 37.2% | 8th | +1.0pp | 5th | 3% above peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 34.9% | 4th | +1.6pp | 6th | 3% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 35.6% | 6th | +1.7pp | 7th | 1% below peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 34.9% | 5th | +1.9pp | 8th | 3% below peers | ||
| Dallas, TX | 40.5% | 12th | +2.6pp | 9th | 12% above peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 31.5% | 1st | +2.4pp | 10th | 13% below peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 37.7% | 10th | +3.1pp | 11th | 4% above peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 37.8% | 11th | +4.4pp | 12th | 5% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
No vehicle changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (5.5% then, 5.5% now; margin ±0.5pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas ref | 5.4% | +0.2pp | |||||
| United States ref | 8.3% | -0.3pp | |||||
| Indianapolis, IN | 8.4% | 7th | -0.9pp | 1st | on par with peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 7.3% | 6th | -0.6pp | 2nd | 13% below peers | ||
| Dallas, TX | 8.8% | 9th | -0.5pp | 3rd | 5% above peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 8.5% | 8th | -0.4pp | 4th | 1% above peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 30.2% | 12th | -0.7pp | 5th | 259% above peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 5.5% | 1st | -0.0pp | 6th | 35% below peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 6.4% | 3rd | +0.0pp | 7th | 24% below peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 10.3% | 10th | +0.5pp | 8th | 23% above peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 19.0% | 11th | +1.2pp | 9th | 125% above peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 6.5% | 4th | +0.4pp | 10th | 23% below peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 7.1% | 5th | +0.9pp | 11th | 16% below peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 6.1% | 2nd | +0.9pp | 12th | 27% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (18.1% then, 18.4% now; margin ±0.6pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas ref | 16.2% | -0.3pp | |||||
| United States ref | 8.2% | -0.4pp | |||||
| Indianapolis, IN | 8.7% | 4th | -1.6pp | 1st | 20% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 3.3% | 1st | -0.4pp | 2nd | 70% below peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 12.3% | 8th | -1.2pp | 3rd | 13% above peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 4.8% | 3rd | -0.4pp | 4th | 56% below peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 10.9% | 7th | -0.8pp | 5th | on par with peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 13.5% | 10th | -0.8pp | 6th | 24% above peers | ||
| Dallas, TX | 22.6% | 12th | -0.8pp | 7th | 106% above peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 8.9% | 5th | -0.3pp | 8th | 18% below peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 4.2% | 2nd | +0.0pp | 9th | 62% below peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 18.4% | 11th | +0.2pp | 10th | 68% above peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 12.8% | 9th | +0.3pp | 11th | 17% above peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 10.2% | 6th | +1.3pp | 12th | 6% below peers |
Modeled estimate with no usable trend; the level is shown and no trend claims are made.
Adult obesity is somewhat above the peer median.
| Place | Latest | Today's rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas ref | 36.8% | |||
| United States ref | 33.4% | |||
| San Francisco, CA | 18.2% | 1st | 47% below peers | |
| San Jose, CA | 23.2% | 2nd | 32% below peers | |
| Denver, CO | 23.2% | 3rd | 32% below peers | |
| Seattle, WA | 23.4% | 4th | 32% below peers | |
| Austin, TX | 29.2% | 5th | 15% below peers | |
| Jacksonville, FL | 33.7% | 6th | 2% below peers | |
| Charlotte, NC | 34.3% | 7th | on par with peers | |
| Dallas, TX | 36.0% | 8th | 5% above peers | |
| Columbus, OH | 38.4% | 9th | 12% above peers | |
| Indianapolis, IN | 39.5% | 10th | 15% above peers | |
| Fort Worth, TX | 39.7% | 11th | 16% above peers | |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 39.8% | 12th | 16% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin, in the wrong direction for this metric.
Child uninsured rose 1.9 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 11.7% to 13.5% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.0pp). 6 of the 11 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas ref | 12.0% | +1.2pp | |||||
| United States ref | 5.5% | +0.4pp | |||||
| San Jose, CA | 1.8% | 1st | -0.3pp | 1st | 75% below peers | ||
| Indianapolis, IN | 5.2% | 4th | -0.9pp | 2nd | 25% below peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 7.0% | 7th | +0.2pp | 3rd | on par with peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 9.6% | 10th | +0.6pp | 4th | 38% above peers | ||
| Dallas, TX | 16.3% | 12th | +1.4pp | 5th | 134% above peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 8.0% | 8th | +0.9pp | 6th | 15% above peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 13.5% | 11th | +1.8pp | 7th | 95% above peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 6.7% | 6th | +1.3pp | 8th | 4% below peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 5.7% | 5th | +1.5pp | 9th | 18% below peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 8.7% | 9th | +2.3pp | 10th | 25% above peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 1.9% | 2nd | +0.5pp | 11th | 72% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 2.2% | 3rd | +0.7pp | 12th | 68% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods clears the combined published margin AND is big enough to matter next to the peer spread.
College attainment rose 2.4 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 29.7% to 32.0% - more than the combined survey margin (±0.9pp). 11 of the 11 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas ref | 33.8% | +3.9pp | |||||
| United States ref | 35.7% | +3.5pp | |||||
| Jacksonville, FL | 33.2% | 11th | +4.6pp | 1st | 30% below peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 59.6% | 3rd | +7.8pp | 2nd | 26% above peers | ||
| Dallas, TX | 38.2% | 7th | +4.9pp | 3rd | 19% below peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 56.5% | 4th | +7.1pp | 4th | 20% above peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 34.7% | 10th | +4.1pp | 5th | 27% below peers | ||
| Indianapolis, IN | 34.9% | 9th | +4.0pp | 6th | 26% below peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 48.0% | 5th | +3.7pp | 7th | 1% above peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 47.3% | 6th | +3.6pp | 8th | on par with peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 32.0% | 12th | +2.4pp | 9th | 32% below peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 68.5% | 1st | +4.4pp | 10th | 45% above peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 38.2% | 8th | +1.6pp | 11th | 19% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 60.3% | 2nd | +2.3pp | 12th | 28% above peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Preschool enrollment changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (39.0% then, 39.1% now; margin ±4.9pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas ref | 43.3% | +0.1pp | |||||
| United States ref | 45.5% | ||||||
| Dallas, TX | 47.0% | 6th | +4.2pp | 1st | on par with peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 70.3% | 2nd | +1.0pp | 2nd | 50% above peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 39.0% | 11th | +0.1pp | 3rd | 17% below peers | ||
| Indianapolis, IN | 41.2% | 8th | -0.4pp | 4th | 12% below peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 39.4% | 10th | -0.7pp | 5th | 16% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 73.2% | 1st | -1.3pp | 6th | 56% above peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 51.8% | 5th | -1.9pp | 7th | 10% above peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 54.3% | 3rd | -2.5pp | 8th | 15% above peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 52.5% | 4th | -3.2pp | 9th | 12% above peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 41.1% | 9th | -2.5pp | 10th | 13% below peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 42.5% | 7th | -5.1pp | 11th | 10% below peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 33.8% | 12th | -5.7pp | 12th | 28% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is smaller than the combined published margin of error, so no real change can be claimed.
Disconnected youth changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (7.2% then, 7.5% now; margin ±1.5pp).
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas ref | 8.2% | +0.4pp | |||||
| United States ref | 6.9% | +0.3pp | |||||
| Indianapolis, IN | 7.8% | 7th | -1.3pp | 1st | on par with peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 5.5% | 4th | -0.5pp | 2nd | 29% below peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 3.1% | 2nd | -0.2pp | 3rd | 60% below peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 8.2% | 8th | -0.4pp | 4th | 5% above peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 8.4% | 9th | -0.4pp | 5th | 7% above peers | ||
| Dallas, TX | 10.1% | 11th | -0.1pp | 6th | 28% above peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 7.5% | 6th | +0.3pp | 7th | 4% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 3.0% | 1st | +0.2pp | 8th | 62% below peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 3.8% | 3rd | +0.3pp | 9th | 52% below peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 10.3% | 12th | +1.3pp | 10th | 31% above peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 7.1% | 5th | +1.6pp | 11th | 10% below peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 8.6% | 10th | +2.7pp | 12th | 9% above peers |
A real change beyond the survey margin; neither direction is inherently better for this metric.
Population rose about 10% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 874,401 to 963,194 - more than the combined survey margin (±605). 7 of the 11 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fort Worth, TX | 963,194 | 5th | +10% | 1st | 5% above peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 977,670 | 4th | +10% | 2nd | 7% above peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 697,125 | 12th | +8% | 3rd | 24% below peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 903,844 | 7th | +5% | 4th | 1% below peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 754,195 | 10th | +4% | 5th | 18% below peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 914,802 | 6th | +4% | 6th | on par with peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 979,539 | 3rd | +3% | 7th | 7% above peers | ||
| Indianapolis, IN | 885,860 | 8th | +2% | 8th | 3% below peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 718,877 | 11th | +2% | 9th | 21% below peers | ||
| Dallas, TX | 1,307,930 | 1st | -2% | 10th | 43% above peers | ||
| San Jose, CA | 990,138 | 2nd | -4% | 11th | 8% above peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 830,235 | 9th | -5% | 12th | 9% below peers |
The change between non-overlapping survey periods is within the margin, but each of the last 4 annual releases moved the 5-year average the same way. Direction is a reliable early signal; its size is not.
Single-parent changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (33.0% then, 31.5% now; margin ±2.2pp). The newest releases lean downward: each of the last 4 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas ref | 29.6% | -0.3pp | |||||
| United States ref | 29.9% | -0.2pp | |||||
| San Jose, CA | 22.6% | 10th | +1.6pp | 1st | 35% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 21.4% | 11th | +0.6pp | 2nd | 38% below peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 30.9% | 8th | +0.3pp | 3rd | 11% below peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 34.6% | 6th | +0.2pp | 4th | on par with peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 36.4% | 5th | -0.0pp | 5th | 5% above peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 39.3% | 2nd | -0.8pp | 6th | 14% above peers | ||
| Dallas, TX | 39.2% | 4th | -0.9pp | 7th | 13% above peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 45.0% | 1st | -1.1pp | 8th | 30% above peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 26.9% | 9th | -1.1pp | 9th | 22% below peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 31.5% | 7th | -1.4pp | 10th | 9% below peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 21.1% | 12th | -1.0pp | 11th | 39% below peers | ||
| Indianapolis, IN | 39.3% | 3rd | -4.9pp | 12th | 13% above peers |
A real change beyond the survey margin; neither direction is inherently better for this metric.
Working parents rose 7.7 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 59.9% to 67.7% - more than the combined survey margin (±4.0pp). 4 of the 11 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.
| Place | Latest2020-2024 survey | Today's rank | Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 | Sig. | Change rank | History | Latest vs. peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas ref | 63.7% | +3.2pp | |||||
| United States ref | 68.1% | +1.9pp | |||||
| San Jose, CA | 74.6% | 1st | +9.8pp | 1st | 7% above peers | ||
| Fort Worth, TX | 67.7% | 10th | +7.7pp | 2nd | 3% below peers | ||
| Austin, TX | 68.6% | 9th | +6.7pp | 3rd | 1% below peers | ||
| Oklahoma City, OK | 68.8% | 7th | +4.6pp | 4th | 1% below peers | ||
| Denver, CO | 69.9% | 5th | +3.8pp | 5th | 1% above peers | ||
| Seattle, WA | 72.9% | 3rd | +3.8pp | 6th | 5% above peers | ||
| Indianapolis, IN | 70.8% | 4th | +1.4pp | 7th | 2% above peers | ||
| Dallas, TX | 61.3% | 12th | +1.2pp | 8th | 12% below peers | ||
| San Francisco, CA | 73.9% | 2nd | +0.8pp | 9th | 6% above peers | ||
| Charlotte, NC | 68.8% | 8th | +0.5pp | 10th | 1% below peers | ||
| Jacksonville, FL | 66.3% | 11th | -0.1pp | 11th | 5% below peers | ||
| Columbus, OH | 69.5% | 6th | -2.2pp | 12th | on par with peers |