DataWorks Commons
Rialto, CA
← All cities
106,554 people (2025) 100k-250k West

Bright spots 12 indicators

Where Rialto, CA shows a real improvement in recent years, or stands clearly ahead of its peers. How this is calculated →

What needs attention 3 indicators

Where Rialto, CA shows a real worsening in recent years, or trails its peers clearly. How this is calculated →

Big moves & big gaps 4 indicators

Real movement and big differences from peers, where neither direction is simply good or bad. Biggest relative change first; big-gap cards come last. How this is calculated →

All indicators

Economy 7 indicators
Economy

Median household income

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Household income rose about 44% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from $61,518 to $88,857 (each survey's own dollars, not adjusted for inflation) - more than the combined survey margin (±$4,462).

Broader trend
All similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. Rialto started mid-pack and has reached a genuinely better level; worth investigating.
Longer view
Household income rose about 77% from 2014 to 2024 ($50,277 to $88,857).
Bright spot $88,857
20102024
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref $99,122 +32%
United States ref $80,734 +28%
Bend, OR $96,394 15th +47% 1st 1% above peers
Rialto, CA $88,857 19th +44% 2nd 7% below peers
Fayetteville, AR $62,695 30th +43% 3rd 34% below peers
Spokane Valley, WA $74,042 24th +42% 4th 22% below peers
San Tan Valley, AZ $96,713 14th +42% 5th 2% above peers
El Monte, CA $68,030 25th +39% 6th 28% below peers
Jurupa Valley, CA $97,550 13th +38% 7th 3% above peers
Brockton, MA $80,115 21st +37% 8th 16% below peers
Yuma, AZ $65,482 28th +36% 9th 31% below peers
Green Bay, WI $66,206 27th +34% 10th 30% below peers
Lynn, MA $75,043 23rd +34% 11th 21% below peers
Sandy Springs, GA $104,340 9th +33% 12th 10% above peers
Costa Mesa, CA $111,505 7th +33% 13th 17% above peers
St. George, UT $76,508 22nd +31% 14th 20% below peers
Renton, WA $100,432 12th +29% 15th 6% above peers
Georgetown, TX $95,062 16th +29% 16th on par with peers
Vacaville, CA $111,126 8th +27% 17th 17% above peers
Boulder, CO $87,493 20th +26% 18th 8% below peers
Chico, CA $66,977 26th +26% 19th 30% below peers
Carmel, IN $141,505 2nd +25% 20th 49% above peers
Suffolk, VA $92,666 17th +24% 21st 3% below peers
San Mateo, CA $153,504 1st +23% 22nd 61% above peers
West Covina, CA $101,065 11th +22% 23rd 6% above peers
Dearborn, MI $65,324 29th +22% 24th 31% below peers
Columbia, MD $131,490 5th +21% 25th 38% above peers
Centennial, CO $131,928 4th +21% 26th 39% above peers
Downey, CA $90,699 18th +20% 27th 5% below peers
Fishers, IN $130,203 6th +19% 28th 37% above peers
Lee's Summit, MO $102,531 10th +14% 29th 8% above peers
Sugar Land, TX $136,217 3rd +12% 30th 43% above peers
Ponce zona urbana, PR $19,470 31st +12% 31st 80% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyMedian household income
Loading tract map…
1 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (100k-250k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Salinas, CA up about 49% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Lancaster, CA up about 48% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Bend, OR up about 47% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 97% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±$4,120 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Unemployment rate

▼ Lower is better Improving recently, leading peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Unemployment fell 0.7 percentage points over the 12 months ending July 2026, faster than 89% of similar-size cities.

Broader trend
Multi-year view: unemployment rose about 0.4 percentage points a year from 2022 to 2025. That is movement in the wrong direction.
Longer view
Unemployment fell about 0.1 percentage points a year from 2015 to 2025.
Latest
Most recent monthly reading: 5.7% in July 2026, down from 6.4% a year earlier.
Bright spot 5.7%
1990July 2026
▸ Compare all 28 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 5.1% (Jul 26) -0.4pp
United States ref 4.1% (Aug 26) -0.2pp
Downey, CA 4.9% (Jul 26) 18th -0.9pp 1st 7% above peers
El Monte, CA 5.1% (Jul 26) 22nd -0.8pp 2nd 11% above peers
West Covina, CA 4.9% (Jul 26) 19th -0.8pp 3rd 7% above peers
Rialto, CA 5.7% (Jul 26) 25th -0.7pp 4th 24% above peers
Spokane Valley, WA 3.3% (Jul 26) 5th -0.7pp 5th 28% below peers
Chico, CA 5.4% (Jul 26) 24th -0.7pp 6th 17% above peers
Jurupa Valley, CA 4.9% (Jul 26) 20th -0.6pp 7th 7% above peers
Vacaville, CA 4.9% (Jul 26) 21st -0.6pp 8th 7% above peers
Carmel, IN 3.0% (Jul 26) 2nd -0.4pp 9th 35% below peers
Lee's Summit, MO 3.1% (Jul 26) 4th -0.4pp 10th 33% below peers
Fishers, IN 3.0% (Jul 26) 3rd -0.3pp 11th 35% below peers
Lynn, MA 5.2% (Jul 26) 23rd -0.3pp 12th 13% above peers
Boulder, CO 4.0% (Jul 26) 12th -0.2pp 13th 13% below peers
Sandy Springs, GA 2.4% (Jul 26) 1st -0.2pp 14th 48% below peers
Costa Mesa, CA 3.8% (Jul 26) 7th -0.2pp 15th 17% below peers
Fayetteville, AR 3.9% (Jul 26) 10th -0.2pp 16th 15% below peers
San Mateo, CA 3.9% (Jul 26) 11th -0.2pp 17th 15% below peers
Brockton, MA 6.1% (Jul 26) 27th -0.1pp 18th 33% above peers
Bend, OR 4.4% (Jul 26) 14th -0.1pp 19th 4% below peers
Centennial, CO 3.8% (Jul 26) 8th +0.1pp 20th 17% below peers
St. George, UT 3.8% (Jul 26) 9th +0.1pp 21st 17% below peers
Green Bay, WI 3.3% (Jul 26) 6th +0.2pp 22nd 28% below peers
Renton, WA 4.8% (Jul 26) 16th +0.2pp 23rd 4% above peers
Dearborn, MI 5.7% (Jul 26) 26th +0.3pp 24th 24% above peers
Suffolk, VA 4.0% (Jul 26) 13th +0.3pp 25th 13% below peers
Georgetown, TX 4.8% (Jul 26) 17th +0.4pp 26th 4% above peers
Sugar Land, TX 4.6% (Jul 26) 15th +0.4pp 27th on par with peers
Yuma, AZ 13.1% (Jul 26) 28th +1.3pp 28th 185% above peers
Economy

Share of people below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Poverty fell 3.4 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 16.2% to 12.7% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.8pp).

Broader trend
17% of similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction; 7% moved the other way. Rialto started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
Longer view
Poverty fell 7.6 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (20.3% to 12.7%).
Bright spot 12.7%
20112024
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 12.0% -1.3pp
United States ref 12.4%
Costa Mesa, CA 9.1% 15th -2.7pp 1st 3% below peers
Rialto, CA 12.7% 20th -3.4pp 2nd 35% above peers
Jurupa Valley, CA 11.0% 18th -2.9pp 3rd 17% above peers
Lynn, MA 13.8% 23rd -2.8pp 4th 47% above peers
Yuma, AZ 15.5% 25th -2.7pp 5th 65% above peers
Bend, OR 8.8% 13th -1.5pp 6th 6% below peers
Dearborn, MI 24.3% 30th -3.8pp 7th 159% above peers
St. George, UT 11.4% 19th -1.7pp 8th 21% above peers
Renton, WA 8.1% 9th -1.1pp 9th 13% below peers
El Monte, CA 17.4% 26th -2.0pp 10th 86% above peers
Fayetteville, AR 20.6% 27th -2.3pp 11th 120% above peers
Suffolk, VA 9.4% 16th -1.0pp 12th on par with peers
Brockton, MA 13.5% 22nd -1.3pp 13th 44% above peers
Chico, CA 22.7% 29th -0.5pp 14th 142% above peers
Ponce zona urbana, PR 49.6% 31st -0.6pp 15th 429% above peers
Green Bay, WI 14.7% 24th -0.1pp 16th 57% above peers
San Tan Valley, AZ 8.0% 8th +0.0pp 17th 15% below peers
Downey, CA 9.0% 14th +0.1pp 18th 4% below peers
Centennial, CO 3.3% 1st +0.1pp 19th 65% below peers
Columbia, MD 7.5% 6th +0.3pp 20th 20% below peers
Spokane Valley, WA 12.9% 21st +0.6pp 21st 38% above peers
Boulder, CO 21.4% 28th +1.1pp 22nd 128% above peers
San Mateo, CA 8.2% 10th +0.7pp 23rd 12% below peers
Carmel, IN 3.9% 2nd +0.4pp 24th 58% below peers
Vacaville, CA 8.2% 11th +0.9pp 25th 12% below peers
Sandy Springs, GA 8.5% 12th +0.9pp 26th 9% below peers
Georgetown, TX 8.0% 7th +1.1pp 27th 15% below peers
West Covina, CA 10.0% 17th +1.7pp 28th 6% above peers
Lee's Summit, MO 5.7% 5th +1.1pp 29th 39% below peers
Sugar Land, TX 5.5% 4th +1.3pp 30th 41% below peers
Fishers, IN 4.0% 3rd +1.1pp 31st 57% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of people below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
1 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (100k-250k) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Miami Gardens, FL down 7.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • North Charleston, SC down 6.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Tyler, TX down 5.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 97% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±2.2pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Share of children below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Child poverty fell 5.8 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 23.9% to 18.1% - more than the combined survey margin (±3.0pp).

Broader trend
23% of similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction; 10% moved the other way. Rialto started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
Longer view
Child poverty fell 7.5 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (25.6% to 18.1%).
Bright spot 18.1%
20132024
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 15.0% -3.1pp
United States ref 16.1%
Brockton, MA 15.2% 21st -4.9pp 1st 25% above peers
Rialto, CA 18.1% 24th -5.8pp 2nd 49% above peers
Jurupa Valley, CA 15.1% 20th -4.3pp 3rd 24% above peers
Renton, WA 8.6% 7th -2.3pp 4th 30% below peers
Suffolk, VA 12.7% 18th -3.3pp 5th 4% above peers
Georgetown, TX 6.2% 5th -1.5pp 6th 49% below peers
Sandy Springs, GA 10.1% 11th -2.3pp 7th 17% below peers
Yuma, AZ 21.8% 27th -4.8pp 8th 79% above peers
Bend, OR 10.4% 12th -2.1pp 9th 15% below peers
Lynn, MA 17.9% 23rd -3.4pp 10th 47% above peers
St. George, UT 13.2% 19th -2.4pp 11th 8% above peers
Dearborn, MI 34.5% 30th -5.3pp 12th 183% above peers
Costa Mesa, CA 12.2% 16th -1.9pp 13th on par with peers
El Monte, CA 26.6% 29th -3.7pp 14th 118% above peers
Columbia, MD 9.8% 10th -0.8pp 15th 20% below peers
Ponce zona urbana, PR 65.9% 31st -4.2pp 16th 440% above peers
Downey, CA 11.2% 15th -0.4pp 17th 8% below peers
Spokane Valley, WA 16.9% 22nd +0.2pp 18th 39% above peers
Green Bay, WI 20.1% 25th +0.4pp 19th 65% above peers
Fishers, IN 3.0% 2nd +0.1pp 20th 76% below peers
San Mateo, CA 8.9% 8th +0.6pp 21st 27% below peers
Centennial, CO 2.9% 1st +0.2pp 22nd 76% below peers
Carmel, IN 4.1% 3rd +0.3pp 23rd 66% below peers
West Covina, CA 12.3% 17th +1.9pp 24th 1% above peers
Fayetteville, AR 20.9% 26th +3.2pp 25th 71% above peers
Chico, CA 22.2% 28th +3.9pp 26th 82% above peers
Vacaville, CA 10.8% 13th +2.0pp 27th 11% below peers
San Tan Valley, AZ 10.9% 14th +2.7pp 28th 10% below peers
Sugar Land, TX 6.0% 4th +1.6pp 29th 51% below peers
Boulder, CO 9.1% 9th +2.7pp 30th 26% below peers
Lee's Summit, MO 7.5% 6th +2.3pp 31st 38% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of children below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
1 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (100k-250k) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Miami Gardens, FL down 14.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Gresham, OR down 11.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • North Charleston, SC down 13.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 96% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±2.2pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Households with a broadband internet subscription

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Broadband rose 14.2 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 78.1% to 92.3% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.1pp).

Broader trend
93% of similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. Rialto started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
Longer view
Broadband rose 18.6 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (73.7% to 92.3%).
Bright spot 92.3%
20172024
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 93.6% +6.6pp
United States ref 91.1%
Ponce zona urbana, PR 85.9% 31st +25.5pp 1st 8% below peers
Rialto, CA 92.3% 21st +14.2pp 2nd 2% below peers
El Monte, CA 90.0% 29th +12.2pp 3rd 4% below peers
Dearborn, MI 93.4% 18th +11.8pp 4th on par with peers
Lynn, MA 91.5% 24th +11.5pp 5th 2% below peers
Brockton, MA 89.9% 30th +9.1pp 6th 4% below peers
Yuma, AZ 90.4% 27th +9.1pp 7th 4% below peers
Suffolk, VA 90.2% 28th +8.8pp 8th 4% below peers
Green Bay, WI 90.6% 25th +8.9pp 9th 3% below peers
Fayetteville, AR 91.9% 22nd +7.7pp 10th 2% below peers
Jurupa Valley, CA 93.5% 17th +6.3pp 11th on par with peers
Downey, CA 93.1% 20th +6.2pp 12th 1% below peers
West Covina, CA 94.2% 15th +5.9pp 13th 1% above peers
St. George, UT 91.9% 23rd +5.7pp 14th 2% below peers
Spokane Valley, WA 90.5% 26th +5.0pp 15th 3% below peers
Georgetown, TX 95.1% 13th +5.2pp 16th 1% above peers
Lee's Summit, MO 95.8% 9th +5.2pp 17th 2% above peers
Chico, CA 93.7% 16th +5.1pp 18th on par with peers
Costa Mesa, CA 96.1% 6th +4.7pp 19th 3% above peers
San Tan Valley, AZ 97.0% 3rd +4.0pp 20th 3% above peers
San Mateo, CA 95.7% 10th +3.8pp 21st 2% above peers
Boulder, CO 95.6% 11th +3.6pp 22nd 2% above peers
Sandy Springs, GA 95.2% 12th +3.4pp 23rd 2% above peers
Vacaville, CA 96.0% 7th +3.1pp 24th 2% above peers
Renton, WA 94.4% 14th +2.8pp 25th 1% above peers
Bend, OR 93.1% 19th +2.5pp 26th 1% below peers
Columbia, MD 95.8% 8th +2.6pp 27th 2% above peers
Sugar Land, TX 97.6% 1st +2.5pp 28th 4% above peers
Centennial, CO 96.9% 4th +2.5pp 29th 3% above peers
Carmel, IN 97.2% 2nd +1.3pp 30th 4% above peers
Fishers, IN 96.4% 5th -0.5pp 31st 3% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds with a broadband internet subscription
Loading tract map…
1 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (100k-250k) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Brownsville, TX up 33.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Ponce zona urbana, PR up 25.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • East Los Angeles, CA up 20.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.1pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
★
Economy

Income inequality (Gini index)

▼ Lower is better No measurable change ★ National leader
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Inequality changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (0.40 then, 0.40 now; margin ±0.02).

Broader trend
13% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Inequality held roughly steady from 2014 to 2024.
Bright spot 0.40
20102024
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 0.49 +0.000
United States ref 0.48 +0.001
Fayetteville, AR 0.50 28th -0.028 1st 13% above peers
Fishers, IN 0.40 4th -0.019 2nd 9% below peers
Chico, CA 0.48 27th -0.017 3rd 10% above peers
Vacaville, CA 0.40 2nd -0.011 4th 10% below peers
Carmel, IN 0.45 19th -0.012 5th 2% above peers
Lee's Summit, MO 0.40 5th -0.007 6th 8% below peers
St. George, UT 0.44 16th -0.007 7th on par with peers
Sandy Springs, GA 0.52 29th -0.006 8th 19% above peers
Rialto, CA 0.40 3rd -0.000 9th 9% below peers
Suffolk, VA 0.43 14th -0.000 10th 1% below peers
Brockton, MA 0.46 22nd +0.001 11th 5% above peers
Spokane Valley, WA 0.42 9th +0.002 12th 5% below peers
Green Bay, WI 0.44 17th +0.003 13th 1% above peers
Ponce zona urbana, PR 0.58 31st +0.005 14th 31% above peers
San Tan Valley, AZ 0.36 1st +0.004 15th 18% below peers
Sugar Land, TX 0.44 18th +0.005 16th 1% above peers
Georgetown, TX 0.43 11th +0.007 17th 3% below peers
Yuma, AZ 0.45 20th +0.008 18th 3% above peers
Dearborn, MI 0.48 25th +0.010 19th 10% above peers
Jurupa Valley, CA 0.41 8th +0.009 20th 6% below peers
Lynn, MA 0.47 23rd +0.012 21st 7% above peers
Renton, WA 0.43 12th +0.012 22nd 2% below peers
El Monte, CA 0.44 15th +0.012 23rd on par with peers
Bend, OR 0.47 24th +0.014 24th 7% above peers
Centennial, CO 0.41 7th +0.014 25th 7% below peers
Columbia, MD 0.41 6th +0.014 26th 8% below peers
Costa Mesa, CA 0.46 21st +0.016 27th 4% above peers
West Covina, CA 0.43 10th +0.019 28th 3% below peers
San Mateo, CA 0.48 26th +0.023 29th 10% above peers
Boulder, CO 0.56 30th +0.029 30th 28% above peers
Downey, CA 0.43 13th +0.028 31st 2% below peers
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B19083) through 2024 ±0.02 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Households receiving SNAP

▼ Lower is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

SNAP fell 4.0 percentage points between the 2014-2018 and 2019-2023 surveys, from 22.8% to 18.8% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.4pp). That reverses the previous span, which went up between the 2009-2013 and 2014-2018 surveys.

Broader trend
17% of similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction; 27% moved the other way. Rialto started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
Longer view
Snap held roughly steady from 2013 to 2023.
Bright spot 18.8%
20102023
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2019-2023 survey Today's rank Change2014-2018 → 2019-2023 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 11.4% +2.2pp
United States ref 11.8% -0.5pp
Bend, OR 7.7% 12th -4.9pp 1st 11% below peers
St. George, UT 5.6% 10th -3.1pp 2nd 35% below peers
Sandy Springs, GA 3.6% 4th -1.3pp 3rd 58% below peers
Fishers, IN 1.4% 1st -0.5pp 4th 83% below peers
Jurupa Valley, CA 10.9% 17th -2.8pp 5th 27% above peers
Rialto, CA 18.8% 26th -4.0pp 6th 118% above peers
Suffolk, VA 11.2% 18th -1.7pp 7th 30% above peers
Yuma, AZ 15.7% 23rd -1.2pp 8th 83% above peers
Dearborn, MI 21.6% 27th -1.3pp 9th 152% above peers
Carmel, IN 1.6% 2nd -0.1pp 10th 82% below peers
Renton, WA 11.6% 21st +0.3pp 11th 36% above peers
Spokane Valley, WA 17.3% 25th +0.4pp 12th 102% above peers
Columbia, MD 8.1% 15th +0.2pp 13th 6% below peers
Lynn, MA 28.9% 29th +0.9pp 14th 236% above peers
Fayetteville, AR 6.8% 11th +0.2pp 15th 21% below peers
San Tan Valley, AZ 8.6% 16th +0.3pp 16th on par with peers
Brockton, MA 31.4% 30th +2.2pp 17th 266% above peers
Green Bay, WI 17.1% 24th +1.5pp 18th 100% above peers
Lee's Summit, MO 4.0% 7th +0.4pp 19th 53% below peers
Vacaville, CA 8.1% 14th +1.2pp 20th 6% below peers
San Mateo, CA 3.9% 6th +0.6pp 21st 55% below peers
Ponce zona urbana, PR 54.5% 31st +8.5pp 22nd 535% above peers
Boulder, CO 5.1% 8th +1.0pp 23rd 40% below peers
Georgetown, TX 5.3% 9th +1.1pp 24th 38% below peers
Costa Mesa, CA 7.7% 13th +2.0pp 25th 10% below peers
Chico, CA 14.8% 22nd +3.9pp 26th 72% above peers
El Monte, CA 22.1% 28th +6.6pp 27th 157% above peers
Centennial, CO 2.5% 3rd +0.9pp 28th 70% below peers
Downey, CA 11.2% 19th +4.1pp 29th 30% above peers
Sugar Land, TX 3.7% 5th +1.8pp 30th 56% below peers
West Covina, CA 11.4% 20th +6.1pp 31st 33% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2018 to 2023, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds receiving SNAP
Loading tract map…
1 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (100k-250k) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Nampa, ID down 6.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2018-2023
  • North Charleston, SC down 5.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 97% of this group · 2018-2023
  • Chattanooga, TN down 4.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 94% of this group · 2018-2023
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2023 ±1.8pp at 90% confidence (2023 estimate) survey trend: 2014-2018 vs 2019-2023 surveys about this metric
See all Economy data →
Housing 6 indicators
Housing

Typical home value

No better direction Rising recently
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Home value rose about 1% over the 12 months ending August 2026, faster than 56% of similar-size cities.

Broader trend
Multi-year view: home value rose about 3% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 63% of similar-size cities.
Longer view
Home value rose about 11% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Latest
Most recent monthly reading: $589,453 in August 2026, up from $581,379 a year earlier.
$589,453
2000August 2026
▸ Compare all 28 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref $764,158 (Aug 26) +0.4%
United States ref $368,697 (Aug 26) +1.2%
Costa Mesa, CA $1,411,696 (Aug 26) 2nd +6.3% 1st 143% above peers
Green Bay, WI $285,361 (Aug 26) 27th +5.4% 2nd 51% below peers
Carmel, IN $574,220 (Aug 26) 15th +4.6% 3rd 1% below peers
San Mateo, CA $1,672,329 (Aug 26) 1st +4.6% 4th 188% above peers
Dearborn, MI $250,741 (Aug 26) 28th +4.2% 5th 57% below peers
Fayetteville, AR $383,552 (Aug 26) 25th +4.0% 6th 34% below peers
Sandy Springs, GA $692,396 (Aug 26) 9th +3.5% 7th 19% above peers
Suffolk, VA $389,533 (Aug 26) 24th +2.7% 8th 33% below peers
Downey, CA $878,882 (Aug 26) 4th +2.3% 9th 51% above peers
Brockton, MA $508,661 (Aug 26) 16th +2.2% 10th 12% below peers
Fishers, IN $444,527 (Aug 26) 19th +1.8% 11th 23% below peers
Jurupa Valley, CA $675,290 (Aug 26) 10th +1.8% 12th 16% above peers
Rialto, CA $589,453 (Aug 26) 13th +1.4% 13th 2% above peers
El Monte, CA $752,694 (Aug 26) 6th +1.2% 14th 30% above peers
Boulder, CO $948,693 (Aug 26) 3rd +0.9% 15th 63% above peers
West Covina, CA $835,555 (Aug 26) 5th +0.9% 16th 44% above peers
Lynn, MA $580,377 (Aug 26) 14th +0.7% 17th on par with peers
Chico, CA $460,839 (Aug 26) 18th +0.6% 18th 21% below peers
Columbia, MD $507,609 (Aug 26) 17th +0.5% 19th 13% below peers
Spokane Valley, WA $410,897 (Aug 26) 22nd +0.4% 20th 29% below peers
Yuma, AZ $295,611 (Aug 26) 26th +0.3% 21st 49% below peers
Sugar Land, TX $442,326 (Aug 26) 20th +0.2% 22nd 24% below peers
Vacaville, CA $601,486 (Aug 26) 12th -0.5% 23rd 4% above peers
Bend, OR $729,189 (Aug 26) 8th -0.8% 24th 26% above peers
Centennial, CO $632,941 (Aug 26) 11th -1.3% 25th 9% above peers
Renton, WA $731,654 (Aug 26) 7th -1.9% 26th 26% above peers
San Tan Valley, AZ $392,485 (Aug 26) 23rd -2.6% 27th 32% below peers
Georgetown, TX $420,930 (Aug 26) 21st -4.3% 28th 27% below peers
Housing

Starter home value (bottom tier)

No better direction Rising recently, faster than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Starter homes rose about 2% over the 12 months ending August 2026, faster than 70% of similar-size cities.

Broader trend
Multi-year view: starter homes rose about 4% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 63% of similar-size cities.
Longer view
Starter homes rose about 14% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Latest
Most recent monthly reading: $525,741 in August 2026, up from $515,275 a year earlier.
Big move $525,741
2000August 2026
▸ Compare all 28 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref $467,879 (Aug 26) -0.0%
United States ref $200,550 (Aug 26) +2.2%
Green Bay, WI $221,083 (Aug 26) 26th +7.2% 1st 46% below peers
Costa Mesa, CA $1,014,150 (Aug 26) 1st +6.1% 2nd 146% above peers
Dearborn, MI $192,346 (Aug 26) 28th +5.6% 3rd 53% below peers
Fayetteville, AR $284,238 (Aug 26) 23rd +4.6% 4th 31% below peers
Carmel, IN $399,066 (Aug 26) 15th +3.9% 5th 3% below peers
Suffolk, VA $255,290 (Aug 26) 25th +3.7% 6th 38% below peers
Brockton, MA $413,016 (Aug 26) 14th +3.4% 7th on par with peers
Downey, CA $746,237 (Aug 26) 3rd +2.5% 8th 81% above peers
Rialto, CA $525,741 (Aug 26) 8th +2.0% 9th 27% above peers
Fishers, IN $339,609 (Aug 26) 19th +1.9% 10th 18% below peers
Jurupa Valley, CA $556,089 (Aug 26) 6th +1.8% 11th 35% above peers
San Mateo, CA $995,042 (Aug 26) 2nd +1.7% 12th 141% above peers
El Monte, CA $635,761 (Aug 26) 5th +1.5% 13th 54% above peers
Chico, CA $351,343 (Aug 26) 17th +1.4% 14th 15% below peers
Spokane Valley, WA $329,822 (Aug 26) 20th +1.3% 15th 20% below peers
West Covina, CA $720,537 (Aug 26) 4th +1.0% 16th 74% above peers
Lynn, MA $446,726 (Aug 26) 13th +0.2% 17th 8% above peers
Yuma, AZ $209,337 (Aug 26) 27th -0.2% 18th 49% below peers
Columbia, MD $359,977 (Aug 26) 16th -0.3% 19th 13% below peers
Bend, OR $526,152 (Aug 26) 7th -0.8% 20th 27% above peers
Vacaville, CA $502,951 (Aug 26) 10th -0.8% 21st 22% above peers
Sugar Land, TX $303,351 (Aug 26) 22nd -1.6% 22nd 27% below peers
Renton, WA $522,663 (Aug 26) 9th -1.7% 23rd 27% above peers
Boulder, CO $491,064 (Aug 26) 11th -1.8% 24th 19% above peers
Centennial, CO $483,951 (Aug 26) 12th -2.0% 25th 17% above peers
San Tan Valley, AZ $339,749 (Aug 26) 18th -2.3% 26th 18% below peers
Sandy Springs, GA $277,549 (Aug 26) 24th -3.3% 27th 33% below peers
Georgetown, TX $322,231 (Aug 26) 21st -4.0% 28th 22% below peers
Housing

Homeownership rate

▲ Higher is better Improving (small)
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Homeownership rose 2.7 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 63.4% to 66.2% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.4pp).

Broader trend
23% of similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction; 10% moved the other way.
Longer view
Homeownership rose 3.4 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (62.8% to 66.2%).
Bright spot 66.2%
20112024
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 55.9% +1.0pp
United States ref 65.2%
Fayetteville, AR 41.8% 29th +5.2pp 1st 35% below peers
Yuma, AZ 66.8% 12th +5.5pp 2nd 3% above peers
Vacaville, CA 67.5% 11th +5.5pp 3rd 4% above peers
Lynn, MA 48.1% 26th +3.2pp 4th 26% below peers
San Tan Valley, AZ 82.2% 1st +3.9pp 5th 27% above peers
Sandy Springs, GA 50.2% 24th +2.2pp 6th 23% below peers
Jurupa Valley, CA 70.1% 8th +3.1pp 7th 8% above peers
Rialto, CA 66.2% 14th +2.7pp 8th 2% above peers
Brockton, MA 57.4% 21st +2.3pp 9th 11% below peers
Green Bay, WI 57.9% 20th +2.3pp 10th 11% below peers
Renton, WA 54.4% 22nd +2.2pp 11th 16% below peers
Costa Mesa, CA 39.5% 31st +1.2pp 12th 39% below peers
Dearborn, MI 68.4% 10th +2.0pp 13th 6% above peers
Suffolk, VA 70.7% 7th +2.0pp 14th 9% above peers
Bend, OR 61.7% 17th +1.7pp 15th 5% below peers
Downey, CA 51.1% 23rd +1.2pp 16th 21% below peers
St. George, UT 66.7% 13th +1.1pp 17th 3% above peers
Spokane Valley, WA 58.2% 19th +0.9pp 18th 10% below peers
Ponce zona urbana, PR 65.4% 15th +0.9pp 19th 1% above peers
El Monte, CA 40.2% 30th +0.2pp 20th 38% below peers
Columbia, MD 64.8% 16th -0.7pp 21st on par with peers
Sugar Land, TX 80.3% 3rd -1.1pp 22nd 24% above peers
Carmel, IN 74.3% 5th -1.3pp 23rd 15% above peers
Centennial, CO 80.6% 2nd -1.6pp 24th 24% above peers
Fishers, IN 76.2% 4th -1.5pp 25th 18% above peers
Boulder, CO 47.2% 27th -1.1pp 26th 27% below peers
Chico, CA 43.4% 28th -1.3pp 27th 33% below peers
West Covina, CA 60.3% 18th -2.3pp 28th 7% below peers
Georgetown, TX 69.5% 9th -2.8pp 29th 7% above peers
Lee's Summit, MO 73.4% 6th -3.8pp 30th 13% above peers
San Mateo, CA 49.9% 25th -4.5pp 31st 23% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHomeownership rate
Loading tract map…
1 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.9pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Housing

Typical asking rent

No better direction Rising recently, faster than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Rent rose about 4% over the 12 months ending August 2026, faster than 85% of similar-size cities.

Broader trend
Multi-year view: rent rose about 3% a year from 2022 to 2026, slower than 52% of similar-size cities.
Latest
Most recent monthly reading: $2,686 in August 2026, up from $2,574 a year earlier.
Big move $2,686
2022August 2026
▸ Compare all 28 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
United States ref $1,948 (Aug 26) +2.5%
San Mateo, CA $3,917 (Aug 26) 1st +9.6% 1st 75% above peers
Carmel, IN $1,838 (Aug 26) 20th +8.1% 2nd 18% below peers
Suffolk, VA $2,049 (Aug 26) 16th +6.3% 3rd 8% below peers
Fishers, IN $1,911 (Aug 26) 19th +4.6% 4th 15% below peers
Rialto, CA $2,686 (Aug 26) 3rd +4.3% 5th 20% above peers
Green Bay, WI $1,066 (Aug 26) 28th +3.9% 6th 52% below peers
Columbia, MD $2,259 (Aug 26) 13th +3.9% 7th 1% above peers
Downey, CA $2,305 (Aug 26) 11th +3.4% 8th 3% above peers
Bend, OR $2,288 (Aug 26) 12th +3.2% 9th 2% above peers
Yuma, AZ $1,459 (Aug 26) 27th +3.1% 10th 35% below peers
Brockton, MA $2,341 (Aug 26) 9th +3.0% 11th 5% above peers
Costa Mesa, CA $3,148 (Aug 26) 2nd +2.8% 12th 41% above peers
Dearborn, MI $1,805 (Aug 26) 21st +2.8% 13th 19% below peers
Renton, WA $2,236 (Aug 26) 14th +2.7% 14th on par with peers
Fayetteville, AR $1,612 (Aug 26) 24th +2.3% 15th 28% below peers
Lynn, MA $2,313 (Aug 26) 10th +2.3% 16th 3% above peers
West Covina, CA $2,580 (Aug 26) 6th +2.2% 17th 15% above peers
San Tan Valley, AZ $2,035 (Aug 26) 17th +2.0% 18th 9% below peers
Georgetown, TX $1,621 (Aug 26) 23rd +1.9% 19th 28% below peers
Spokane Valley, WA $1,547 (Aug 26) 25th +1.7% 20th 31% below peers
Jurupa Valley, CA $2,610 (Aug 26) 5th +1.6% 21st 17% above peers
Vacaville, CA $2,614 (Aug 26) 4th +1.5% 22nd 17% above peers
Boulder, CO $2,399 (Aug 26) 7th +1.4% 23rd 7% above peers
El Monte, CA $2,361 (Aug 26) 8th +1.2% 24th 6% above peers
Chico, CA $1,544 (Aug 26) 26th +1.1% 25th 31% below peers
Sandy Springs, GA $1,706 (Aug 26) 22nd +0.6% 26th 24% below peers
Centennial, CO $2,231 (Aug 26) 15th -0.5% 27th on par with peers
Sugar Land, TX $2,032 (Aug 26) 18th -0.6% 28th 9% below peers
Housing

Housing cost-burdened households

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Cost burden changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (43.2% then, 40.6% now; margin ±3.7pp).

Broader trend
17% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Cost burden fell 9.0 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (49.6% to 40.6%).
Needs attention 40.6%
20102024
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 41.7% +0.0pp
United States ref 32.2% +0.4pp
Bend, OR 34.1% 14th -2.8pp 1st 2% below peers
San Tan Valley, AZ 27.2% 6th -2.2pp 2nd 22% below peers
El Monte, CA 48.1% 30th -3.9pp 3rd 38% above peers
Rialto, CA 40.6% 23rd -2.6pp 4th 17% above peers
Yuma, AZ 30.9% 10th -1.8pp 5th 11% below peers
Green Bay, WI 27.4% 7th -1.4pp 6th 21% below peers
Columbia, MD 27.7% 8th -0.7pp 7th 20% below peers
Fayetteville, AR 35.3% 17th -0.9pp 8th 2% above peers
Costa Mesa, CA 43.3% 25th -0.9pp 9th 25% above peers
Sandy Springs, GA 32.3% 11th -0.2pp 10th 7% below peers
Jurupa Valley, CA 38.9% 21st -0.2pp 11th 12% above peers
Spokane Valley, WA 34.8% 16th -0.1pp 12th on par with peers
San Mateo, CA 38.7% 18th -0.1pp 13th 11% above peers
Downey, CA 44.9% 28th +0.1pp 14th 29% above peers
Suffolk, VA 34.1% 15th +0.2pp 15th 2% below peers
St. George, UT 33.0% 12th +0.5pp 16th 5% below peers
Chico, CA 44.7% 27th +1.1pp 17th 29% above peers
Ponce zona urbana, PR 29.3% 9th +0.8pp 18th 16% below peers
West Covina, CA 40.7% 24th +1.1pp 19th 17% above peers
Renton, WA 38.7% 19th +1.1pp 20th 11% above peers
Brockton, MA 43.4% 26th +1.3pp 21st 25% above peers
Boulder, CO 46.0% 29th +2.3pp 22nd 32% above peers
Lynn, MA 49.7% 31st +2.9pp 23rd 43% above peers
Vacaville, CA 38.8% 20th +2.5pp 24th 12% above peers
Dearborn, MI 39.2% 22nd +2.8pp 25th 13% above peers
Georgetown, TX 33.4% 13th +3.8pp 26th 4% below peers
Carmel, IN 20.6% 2nd +2.5pp 27th 41% below peers
Fishers, IN 20.1% 1st +2.5pp 28th 42% below peers
Sugar Land, TX 26.9% 5th +4.3pp 29th 23% below peers
Centennial, CO 26.9% 4th +4.6pp 30th 23% below peers
Lee's Summit, MO 26.7% 3rd +5.2pp 31st 23% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHousing cost-burdened households
Loading tract map…
1 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (100k-250k) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Salinas, CA down 5.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Fontana, CA down 5.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • East Los Angeles, CA down 4.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
Housing

Households without a vehicle

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

No vehicle changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (4.8% then, 4.5% now; margin ±1.4pp).

Broader trend
20% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
No vehicle fell 1.2 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (5.7% to 4.5%).
Bright spot 4.5%
20102024
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 7.1% -0.0pp
United States ref 8.3% -0.3pp
Fayetteville, AR 4.7% 12th -2.5pp 1st 10% below peers
Ponce zona urbana, PR 16.1% 29th -4.5pp 2nd 206% above peers
Lynn, MA 17.2% 31st -3.8pp 3rd 227% above peers
San Tan Valley, AZ 2.1% 1st -0.5pp 4th 60% below peers
Sugar Land, TX 2.1% 2nd -0.4pp 5th 60% below peers
Yuma, AZ 5.8% 18th -1.1pp 6th 10% above peers
Carmel, IN 2.5% 3rd -0.4pp 7th 52% below peers
Suffolk, VA 5.0% 15th -0.8pp 8th 4% below peers
St. George, UT 4.2% 10th -0.6pp 9th 21% below peers
Chico, CA 7.0% 22nd -0.8pp 10th 34% above peers
Georgetown, TX 3.5% 6th -0.3pp 11th 34% below peers
Spokane Valley, WA 6.9% 21st -0.5pp 12th 31% above peers
Vacaville, CA 4.0% 9th -0.3pp 13th 23% below peers
Rialto, CA 4.5% 11th -0.3pp 14th 14% below peers
El Monte, CA 9.3% 28th -0.2pp 15th 76% above peers
Sandy Springs, GA 7.2% 23rd -0.1pp 16th 38% above peers
Bend, OR 4.8% 14th -0.1pp 17th 8% below peers
Jurupa Valley, CA 3.9% 8th -0.0pp 18th 27% below peers
Columbia, MD 5.8% 19th +0.1pp 19th 11% above peers
Lee's Summit, MO 3.5% 7th +0.1pp 20th 33% below peers
Green Bay, WI 8.2% 24th +0.4pp 21st 56% above peers
Brockton, MA 16.3% 30th +1.0pp 22nd 210% above peers
Dearborn, MI 8.3% 25th +0.5pp 23rd 58% above peers
Boulder, CO 9.1% 27th +0.9pp 24th 74% above peers
West Covina, CA 5.4% 17th +0.7pp 25th 2% above peers
Costa Mesa, CA 4.8% 13th +0.7pp 26th 8% below peers
Renton, WA 8.4% 26th +1.6pp 27th 60% above peers
Centennial, CO 2.9% 5th +0.7pp 28th 45% below peers
San Mateo, CA 6.8% 20th +1.8pp 29th 30% above peers
Downey, CA 5.3% 16th +1.5pp 30th on par with peers
Fishers, IN 2.7% 4th +0.9pp 31st 49% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHouseholds without a vehicle
Loading tract map…
1 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (100k-250k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Fayetteville, AR down 2.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Visalia, CA down 1.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Victorville, CA down 2.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B08201) through 2024 ±1.0pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Housing data →
Health 3 indicators
Health

People without health insurance

▼ Lower is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Uninsured fell 3.3 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 12.3% to 9.0% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.1pp).

Broader trend
27% of similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction; 7% moved the other way. Rialto started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
Longer view
Uninsured fell 14.3 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (23.3% to 9.0%).
Bright spot 9.0%
20132024
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 6.6% -0.9pp
United States ref 8.4% -0.4pp
Vacaville, CA 2.6% 1st -1.6pp 1st 59% below peers
Downey, CA 7.1% 17th -3.2pp 2nd 10% above peers
Rialto, CA 9.0% 24th -3.3pp 3rd 40% above peers
Bend, OR 6.2% 14th -1.9pp 4th 4% below peers
Ponce zona urbana, PR 4.0% 7th -1.2pp 5th 37% below peers
Costa Mesa, CA 9.5% 25th -2.3pp 6th 48% above peers
Lynn, MA 4.1% 8th -0.9pp 7th 37% below peers
Boulder, CO 3.5% 4th -0.7pp 8th 46% below peers
West Covina, CA 5.7% 13th -0.9pp 9th 12% below peers
Dearborn, MI 5.3% 12th -0.8pp 10th 17% below peers
Spokane Valley, WA 6.2% 15th -0.8pp 11th 3% below peers
Sandy Springs, GA 8.6% 23rd -1.0pp 12th 34% above peers
Jurupa Valley, CA 11.8% 30th -1.2pp 13th 83% above peers
St. George, UT 11.5% 29th -0.9pp 14th 79% above peers
El Monte, CA 12.9% 31st -0.7pp 15th 101% above peers
San Mateo, CA 4.0% 6th -0.1pp 16th 37% below peers
Green Bay, WI 7.8% 20th -0.1pp 17th 21% above peers
Fayetteville, AR 8.3% 21st -0.0pp 18th 28% above peers
Yuma, AZ 11.3% 28th +0.0pp 19th 75% above peers
Suffolk, VA 6.4% 16th +0.1pp 20th on par with peers
Renton, WA 7.6% 19th +0.4pp 21st 19% above peers
Chico, CA 7.2% 18th +0.4pp 22nd 12% above peers
Carmel, IN 3.3% 3rd +0.3pp 23rd 49% below peers
Fishers, IN 3.2% 2nd +0.3pp 24th 50% below peers
San Tan Valley, AZ 9.6% 26th +0.9pp 25th 49% above peers
Centennial, CO 3.8% 5th +0.5pp 26th 41% below peers
Brockton, MA 4.6% 10th +0.6pp 27th 28% below peers
Lee's Summit, MO 4.9% 11th +0.7pp 28th 24% below peers
Columbia, MD 4.6% 9th +0.7pp 29th 29% below peers
Sugar Land, TX 8.3% 22nd +1.4pp 30th 30% above peers
Georgetown, TX 9.8% 27th +2.7pp 31st 53% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthPeople without health insurance
Loading tract map…
1 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (100k-250k) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Riverview, FL down 3.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Hialeah, FL down 5.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Richmond, VA down 3.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 97% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.8pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Health

Adult obesity

▼ Lower is better Level only
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Adult obesity is about a quarter above the peer median.

38.3%
20202022
▸ Compare all 30 similar-size cities best first
Place Latest Today's rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 28.4%
United States ref 33.4%
Boulder, CO 18.9% 1st 40% below peers
San Mateo, CA 22.0% 2nd 30% below peers
Centennial, CO 22.2% 3rd 29% below peers
West Covina, CA 23.7% 4th 24% below peers
Renton, WA 24.4% 5th 22% below peers
Sandy Springs, GA 26.1% 6th 17% below peers
El Monte, CA 26.4% 7th 16% below peers
Carmel, IN 26.5% 8th 15% below peers
Sugar Land, TX 27.2% 9th 13% below peers
Costa Mesa, CA 27.3% 10th 13% below peers
Bend, OR 27.5% 11th 12% below peers
Downey, CA 28.2% 12th 10% below peers
Fishers, IN 28.4% 13th 9% below peers
Columbia, MD 29.1% 14th 7% below peers
St. George, UT 30.1% 15th 4% below peers
Georgetown, TX 31.3% 16th on par with peers
Chico, CA 31.6% 17th 1% above peers
Vacaville, CA 32.4% 18th 4% above peers
Fayetteville, AR 33.7% 19th 8% above peers
Dearborn, MI 33.9% 20th 8% above peers
Spokane Valley, WA 34.0% 21st 9% above peers
Lynn, MA 34.3% 22nd 10% above peers
Lee's Summit, MO 34.9% 23rd 12% above peers
Brockton, MA 35.2% 24th 12% above peers
Jurupa Valley, CA 36.3% 25th 16% above peers
San Tan Valley, AZ 36.5% 26th 17% above peers
Rialto, CA 38.3% 27th 22% above peers
Green Bay, WI 38.9% 28th 24% above peers
Yuma, AZ 41.5% 29th 33% above peers
Suffolk, VA 41.7% 30th 33% above peers
CDC PLACES through 2022 modeled tract map about this metric
Health

Children without health insurance

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Child uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (5.2% then, 4.4% now; margin ±1.5pp).

Broader trend
37% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Child uninsured fell 6.1 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (10.5% to 4.4%).
Needs attention 4.4%
20122024
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 3.2% -0.0pp
United States ref 5.5% +0.4pp
Costa Mesa, CA 2.7% 10th -4.3pp 1st 27% below peers
Downey, CA 3.0% 14th -3.9pp 2nd 17% below peers
Ponce zona urbana, PR 1.7% 3rd -1.0pp 3rd 52% below peers
Sandy Springs, GA 4.2% 19th -1.8pp 4th 14% above peers
Fishers, IN 2.0% 4th -0.8pp 5th 45% below peers
Rialto, CA 4.4% 20th -0.8pp 6th 19% above peers
St. George, UT 11.4% 31st -2.0pp 7th 213% above peers
West Covina, CA 3.0% 13th -0.5pp 8th 17% below peers
Bend, OR 3.6% 16th -0.4pp 9th on par with peers
Yuma, AZ 7.7% 27th -0.7pp 10th 111% above peers
Jurupa Valley, CA 6.3% 25th +0.4pp 11th 73% above peers
Renton, WA 2.4% 7th +0.3pp 12th 35% below peers
San Tan Valley, AZ 9.0% 30th +1.5pp 13th 145% above peers
El Monte, CA 4.0% 18th +0.6pp 14th 10% above peers
Vacaville, CA 1.7% 2nd +0.3pp 15th 53% below peers
Centennial, CO 2.4% 8th +0.5pp 16th 34% below peers
Boulder, CO 1.6% 1st +0.4pp 17th 56% below peers
Dearborn, MI 3.7% 17th +0.9pp 18th on par with peers
Chico, CA 4.7% 22nd +1.2pp 19th 28% above peers
Columbia, MD 3.4% 15th +0.9pp 20th 7% below peers
Spokane Valley, WA 2.6% 9th +0.8pp 21st 29% below peers
Suffolk, VA 4.9% 23rd +1.7pp 22nd 35% above peers
Green Bay, WI 5.7% 24th +2.0pp 23rd 56% above peers
Sugar Land, TX 8.1% 29th +2.9pp 24th 122% above peers
Carmel, IN 2.9% 12th +1.1pp 25th 20% below peers
Lee's Summit, MO 4.4% 21st +1.7pp 26th 20% above peers
San Mateo, CA 2.0% 5th +1.0pp 27th 44% below peers
Fayetteville, AR 7.5% 26th +3.8pp 28th 104% above peers
Lynn, MA 2.2% 6th +1.2pp 29th 39% below peers
Brockton, MA 2.8% 11th +1.6pp 30th 22% below peers
Georgetown, TX 7.9% 28th +5.5pp 31st 117% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthChildren without health insurance
Loading tract map…
1 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (100k-250k) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Costa Mesa, CA down 4.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Downey, CA down 3.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Riverview, FL down 3.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B27001) through 2024 ±1.1pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Health data →
Education 3 indicators
Education

Adults with a bachelor's degree or higher

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

College attainment rose 1.6 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 11.1% to 12.6% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.4pp).

Broader trend
72% of similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. Rialto started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
Longer view
College attainment rose 2.6 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (10.0% to 12.6%).
Bright spot 12.6%
20102024
▸ Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 37.1% +3.1pp
United States ref 35.7% +3.5pp
Lynn, MA 24.1% 24th +5.5pp 1st 39% below peers
St. George, UT 36.7% 16th +7.3pp 2nd 7% below peers
El Monte, CA 15.2% 28th +2.9pp 3rd 62% below peers
Bend, OR 52.9% 9th +8.9pp 4th 34% above peers
Brockton, MA 22.3% 26th +3.7pp 5th 43% below peers
Vacaville, CA 28.0% 20th +4.3pp 6th 29% below peers
Dearborn, MI 34.6% 17th +4.8pp 7th 12% below peers
Georgetown, TX 47.8% 12th +6.2pp 8th 21% above peers
Rialto, CA 12.6% 30th +1.6pp 9th 68% below peers
Spokane Valley, WA 26.5% 22nd +3.1pp 10th 33% below peers
Suffolk, VA 33.3% 18th +3.9pp 11th 15% below peers
Chico, CA 42.2% 14th +4.8pp 12th 7% above peers
Yuma, AZ 20.9% 27th +2.4pp 13th 47% below peers
Jurupa Valley, CA 14.9% 29th +1.7pp 14th 62% below peers
San Tan Valley, AZ 23.9% 25th +2.6pp 15th 39% below peers
Costa Mesa, CA 45.0% 13th +4.6pp 16th 14% above peers
Downey, CA 26.1% 23rd +2.7pp 17th 34% below peers
Centennial, CO 62.6% 7th +5.2pp 18th 59% above peers
Renton, WA 39.5% 15th +3.0pp 19th on par with peers
Green Bay, WI 26.7% 21st +1.9pp 20th 32% below peers
San Mateo, CA 57.8% 8th +3.6pp 21st 47% above peers
Sandy Springs, GA 69.2% 3rd +4.1pp 22nd 75% above peers
Carmel, IN 74.4% 2nd +3.8pp 23rd 89% above peers
Sugar Land, TX 63.0% 6th +2.9pp 24th 60% above peers
West Covina, CA 30.1% 19th +1.1pp 25th 24% below peers
Lee's Summit, MO 48.8% 11th +0.9pp 26th 24% above peers
Columbia, MD 63.6% 5th +0.9pp 27th 61% above peers
Boulder, CO 76.8% 1st +0.8pp 28th 95% above peers
Fishers, IN 66.5% 4th +0.0pp 29th 68% above peers
Fayetteville, AR 49.0% 10th -1.2pp 30th 24% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationAdults with a bachelor's degree or higher
Loading tract map…
1 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (100k-250k) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Hialeah, FL up 6.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Ontario, CA up 5.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • East Los Angeles, CA up 2.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.1pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Education

Children ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool

▲ Higher is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Preschool enrollment fell 18.5 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 43.6% to 25.1% - more than the combined survey margin (±9.0pp). That is movement in the wrong direction.

Broader trend
30% of similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction; 7% moved the other way.
Longer view
Preschool enrollment fell 15.7 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (40.8% to 25.1%).
Needs attention 25.1%
20112024
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 44.5% -5.1pp
United States ref 45.5%
Dearborn, MI 51.3% 11th +14.5pp 1st 14% above peers
Sandy Springs, GA 68.2% 2nd +18.3pp 2nd 52% above peers
Lynn, MA 32.8% 26th +6.9pp 3rd 27% below peers
Carmel, IN 72.2% 1st +12.2pp 4th 61% above peers
Fishers, IN 61.2% 6th +7.0pp 5th 36% above peers
El Monte, CA 48.2% 13th +4.4pp 6th 7% above peers
Chico, CA 44.8% 17th +3.0pp 7th on par with peers
Bend, OR 50.9% 12th +2.3pp 8th 13% above peers
Costa Mesa, CA 64.8% 4th +2.7pp 9th 44% above peers
San Mateo, CA 63.1% 5th +1.8pp 10th 40% above peers
Georgetown, TX 45.6% 15th +0.1pp 11th 1% above peers
Green Bay, WI 30.1% 28th -2.1pp 12th 33% below peers
Jurupa Valley, CA 33.0% 24th -2.4pp 13th 27% below peers
Sugar Land, TX 58.2% 8th -4.4pp 14th 29% above peers
Columbia, MD 56.2% 9th -4.3pp 15th 25% above peers
Downey, CA 45.0% 16th -6.3pp 16th on par with peers
Spokane Valley, WA 40.0% 20th -5.6pp 17th 11% below peers
Suffolk, VA 45.8% 14th -7.9pp 18th 2% above peers
San Tan Valley, AZ 29.2% 29th -5.1pp 19th 35% below peers
Ponce zona urbana, PR 56.0% 10th -12.8pp 20th 25% above peers
Centennial, CO 59.5% 7th -14.5pp 21st 32% above peers
Brockton, MA 41.3% 18th -11.2pp 22nd 8% below peers
West Covina, CA 40.9% 19th -12.2pp 23rd 9% below peers
Boulder, CO 64.9% 3rd -21.3pp 24th 44% above peers
Vacaville, CA 32.9% 25th -14.3pp 25th 27% below peers
Lee's Summit, MO 35.4% 22nd -15.9pp 26th 21% below peers
St. George, UT 32.1% 27th -15.7pp 27th 29% below peers
Renton, WA 34.6% 23rd -17.8pp 28th 23% below peers
Yuma, AZ 28.6% 30th -15.4pp 29th 36% below peers
Fayetteville, AR 39.6% 21st -29.2pp 30th 12% below peers
Rialto, CA 25.1% 31st -18.5pp 31st 44% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationChildren ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool
Loading tract map…
1 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (100k-250k) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Nampa, ID up 14.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Edinburg, TX up 13.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Norman, OK up 14.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±7.2pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Education

Teens not in school and not working

▼ Lower is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Disconnected youth fell 4.5 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 11.3% to 6.8% - more than the combined survey margin (±3.7pp).

Broader trend
None of the similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction; 10% moved the other way. Rialto started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.
Longer view
Disconnected youth fell 4.3 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (11.1% to 6.8%).
Bright spot 6.8%
20102024
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 6.7% +0.2pp
United States ref 6.9% +0.3pp
Georgetown, TX 5.0% 7th -6.8pp 1st 23% below peers
Centennial, CO 2.2% 2nd -1.9pp 2nd 65% below peers
Rialto, CA 6.8% 20th -4.4pp 3rd 6% above peers
Lynn, MA 5.7% 13th -3.6pp 4th 12% below peers
El Monte, CA 7.0% 21st -2.5pp 5th 8% above peers
Sandy Springs, GA 4.3% 5th -1.3pp 6th 33% below peers
Costa Mesa, CA 5.6% 11th -1.0pp 7th 13% below peers
San Mateo, CA 5.2% 9th -0.9pp 8th 20% below peers
San Tan Valley, AZ 9.7% 25th -1.6pp 9th 50% above peers
Brockton, MA 4.9% 6th -0.5pp 10th 24% below peers
Ponce zona urbana, PR 11.7% 28th -0.2pp 11th 81% above peers
Carmel, IN 3.7% 4th +0.0pp 12th 43% below peers
Downey, CA 6.6% 17th +0.7pp 13th 2% above peers
Chico, CA 3.3% 3rd +0.4pp 14th 49% below peers
Yuma, AZ 12.3% 30th +1.7pp 15th 91% above peers
Spokane Valley, WA 12.0% 29th +1.9pp 16th 86% above peers
Suffolk, VA 6.7% 18th +1.1pp 17th 4% above peers
Jurupa Valley, CA 11.2% 27th +1.9pp 18th 73% above peers
Lee's Summit, MO 6.0% 15th +1.7pp 19th 7% below peers
Fishers, IN 5.7% 12th +1.9pp 20th 13% below peers
Sugar Land, TX 5.1% 8th +1.9pp 21st 21% below peers
Dearborn, MI 7.3% 22nd +2.7pp 22nd 13% above peers
St. George, UT 5.8% 14th +2.2pp 23rd 11% below peers
West Covina, CA 6.5% 16th +2.7pp 24th on par with peers
Vacaville, CA 6.7% 19th +3.0pp 25th 4% above peers
Boulder, CO 2.0% 1st +1.0pp 26th 69% below peers
Columbia, MD 7.4% 23rd +3.5pp 27th 14% above peers
Green Bay, WI 11.1% 26th +5.7pp 28th 72% above peers
Renton, WA 8.4% 24th +4.8pp 29th 30% above peers
Bend, OR 13.0% 31st +7.8pp 30th 102% above peers
Fayetteville, AR 5.2% 10th +3.7pp 31st 20% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationTeens not in school and not working
Loading tract map…
1 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (100k-250k) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Goodyear, AZ down 7.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Avondale, AZ down 6.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 97% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Arlington, VA down 5.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 96% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B14005) through 2024 ±2.4pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Education data →
Demographics 4 indicators
Demographics

Population

No better direction Rising
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Population rose about 1% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 103,045 to 104,143 - more than the combined survey margin (±137).

Broader trend
63% of similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction; 23% moved the other way.
Longer view
Population rose about 3% from 2014 to 2024 (101,367 to 104,143).
104,143
20102024
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Georgetown, TX 85,999 31st +21% 1st 18% below peers
St. George, UT 101,995 25th +21% 2nd 3% below peers
Fayetteville, AR 99,319 29th +17% 3rd 6% below peers
Dearborn, MI 107,423 7th +13% 4th 2% above peers
Fishers, IN 102,337 23rd +13% 5th 3% below peers
San Tan Valley, AZ 109,189 4th +13% 6th 4% above peers
Brockton, MA 105,386 15th +10% 7th on par with peers
Bend, OR 103,390 20th +10% 8th 2% below peers
Suffolk, VA 98,796 30th +10% 9th 6% below peers
Spokane Valley, WA 106,365 12th +9% 10th 1% above peers
Lynn, MA 101,709 26th +8% 11th 3% below peers
Chico, CA 102,188 24th +8% 12th 3% below peers
Lee's Summit, MO 103,656 19th +7% 13th 2% below peers
Carmel, IN 101,651 27th +4% 14th 3% below peers
Yuma, AZ 100,139 28th +4% 15th 5% below peers
Renton, WA 105,317 16th +4% 16th on par with peers
Vacaville, CA 102,596 22nd +4% 17th 3% below peers
Green Bay, WI 106,253 13th +1% 18th 1% above peers
Jurupa Valley, CA 107,011 10th +1% 19th 2% above peers
Rialto, CA 104,143 18th +1% 20th 1% below peers
West Covina, CA 107,037 9th +0% 21st 2% above peers
Columbia, MD 104,338 17th +0% 22nd 1% below peers
Boulder, CO 106,433 11th +0% 23rd 1% above peers
Sandy Springs, GA 107,087 8th +0% 24th 2% above peers
San Mateo, CA 103,105 21st -1% 25th 2% below peers
Downey, CA 110,939 1st -1% 26th 5% above peers
Centennial, CO 108,201 5th -2% 27th 3% above peers
Costa Mesa, CA 110,330 2nd -3% 28th 5% above peers
Ponce zona urbana, PR 107,805 6th -5% 29th 2% above peers
Sugar Land, TX 110,016 3rd -7% 30th 4% above peers
El Monte, CA 106,109 14th -8% 31st 1% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsPopulation
Loading tract map…
1 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±77 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Children's share of the population

No better direction Falling
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Children fell 1.3 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 28.1% to 26.7% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.3pp).

Broader trend
37% of similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.
Longer view
Children fell 2.2 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (28.9% to 26.7%).
Big move 26.7%
20172024
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 22.0% -1.0pp
United States ref 21.9% -0.7pp
Georgetown, TX 19.8% 23rd +1.2pp 1st 10% below peers
Fayetteville, AR 18.0% 29th +0.3pp 2nd 18% below peers
Brockton, MA 25.3% 7th +0.3pp 3rd 15% above peers
Sugar Land, TX 22.9% 14th +0.2pp 4th 4% above peers
St. George, UT 24.7% 8th -0.1pp 5th 13% above peers
El Monte, CA 22.8% 15th -0.2pp 6th 4% above peers
Lynn, MA 24.1% 11th -0.4pp 7th 10% above peers
Dearborn, MI 28.7% 1st -0.6pp 8th 31% above peers
Suffolk, VA 23.6% 13th -0.7pp 9th 8% above peers
Vacaville, CA 21.9% 16th -0.8pp 10th on par with peers
Yuma, AZ 25.5% 6th -0.9pp 11th 16% above peers
Lee's Summit, MO 25.6% 5th -0.9pp 12th 17% above peers
West Covina, CA 20.2% 22nd -0.8pp 13th 8% below peers
Chico, CA 18.4% 27th -0.8pp 14th 16% below peers
Spokane Valley, WA 21.2% 19th -0.9pp 15th 3% below peers
Green Bay, WI 23.7% 12th -1.1pp 16th 8% above peers
Rialto, CA 26.7% 3rd -1.3pp 17th 22% above peers
Columbia, MD 21.0% 20th -1.1pp 18th 4% below peers
Centennial, CO 21.9% 17th -1.3pp 19th on par with peers
Renton, WA 20.8% 21st -1.3pp 20th 5% below peers
Boulder, CO 11.8% 31st -0.7pp 21st 46% below peers
San Mateo, CA 19.6% 24th -1.3pp 22nd 11% below peers
Carmel, IN 24.5% 9th -1.8pp 23rd 12% above peers
Sandy Springs, GA 18.4% 28th -1.4pp 24th 16% below peers
Costa Mesa, CA 18.5% 26th -1.8pp 25th 16% below peers
Fishers, IN 26.7% 4th -2.9pp 26th 22% above peers
Downey, CA 21.3% 18th -2.4pp 27th 3% below peers
Bend, OR 19.3% 25th -2.8pp 28th 12% below peers
Jurupa Valley, CA 24.4% 10th -3.6pp 29th 11% above peers
Ponce zona urbana, PR 17.2% 30th -2.7pp 30th 21% below peers
San Tan Valley, AZ 26.8% 2nd -4.4pp 31st 22% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren's share of the population
Loading tract map…
1 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.0pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Children in single-parent families

No better direction Turning down (early signal)
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Single-parent changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (34.7% then, 34.2% now; margin ±5.0pp). The newest releases lean downward: each of the last 4 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*

Broader trend
23% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Single-parent rose 4.1 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (30.2% to 34.2%).
34.2%
20102024
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 28.5% +0.7pp
United States ref 29.9% -0.2pp
San Mateo, CA 23.5% 22nd +6.8pp 1st 18% below peers
Boulder, CO 27.9% 18th +7.7pp 2nd 3% below peers
West Covina, CA 34.0% 10th +8.6pp 3rd 18% above peers
Jurupa Valley, CA 28.8% 16th +6.0pp 4th on par with peers
Bend, OR 33.4% 11th +6.7pp 5th 16% above peers
San Tan Valley, AZ 21.6% 25th +3.5pp 6th 25% below peers
Spokane Valley, WA 32.4% 12th +4.8pp 7th 13% above peers
El Monte, CA 46.4% 2nd +6.1pp 8th 61% above peers
Green Bay, WI 41.2% 5th +5.3pp 9th 43% above peers
Sandy Springs, GA 27.1% 19th +3.2pp 10th 6% below peers
Sugar Land, TX 10.7% 31st +1.3pp 11th 63% below peers
Lee's Summit, MO 23.2% 23rd +2.6pp 12th 19% below peers
Chico, CA 36.0% 7th +3.6pp 13th 25% above peers
Lynn, MA 45.4% 3rd +3.0pp 14th 58% above peers
Downey, CA 36.3% 6th +2.1pp 15th 26% above peers
Renton, WA 30.8% 15th +1.0pp 16th 7% above peers
Columbia, MD 28.1% 17th +0.2pp 17th 2% below peers
Carmel, IN 13.4% 28th +0.1pp 18th 53% below peers
Ponce zona urbana, PR 68.5% 1st -0.4pp 19th 138% above peers
Suffolk, VA 32.0% 13th -0.2pp 20th 11% above peers
Rialto, CA 34.2% 9th -0.4pp 21st 19% above peers
Fayetteville, AR 31.2% 14th -2.5pp 22nd 8% above peers
Costa Mesa, CA 24.6% 21st -2.0pp 23rd 15% below peers
Yuma, AZ 36.0% 8th -3.6pp 24th 25% above peers
Centennial, CO 15.7% 27th -1.6pp 25th 45% below peers
Vacaville, CA 24.7% 20th -4.0pp 26th 14% below peers
St. George, UT 17.4% 26th -2.9pp 27th 40% below peers
Georgetown, TX 22.0% 24th -4.2pp 28th 24% below peers
Brockton, MA 42.8% 4th -9.3pp 29th 49% above peers
Dearborn, MI 13.4% 29th -3.4pp 30th 54% below peers
Fishers, IN 12.2% 30th -3.8pp 31st 58% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren in single-parent families
Loading tract map…
1 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B09002) through 2024 ±3.0pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys *Early signal: consecutive releases agree on direction only; the size of the newest movement is not measurable from overlapping surveys. about this metric
Demographics

Young children with all parents in the labor force

No better direction No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Working parents changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (59.4% then, 61.0% now; margin ±8.3pp).

Broader trend
7% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Working parents fell 3.7 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (64.6% to 61.0%).
Big move 61.0%
20102024
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 66.5% +3.8pp
United States ref 68.1% +1.9pp
Ponce zona urbana, PR 57.4% 28th +11.7pp 1st 16% below peers
Sandy Springs, GA 72.2% 6th +10.4pp 2nd 5% above peers
Dearborn, MI 37.9% 31st +5.3pp 3rd 45% below peers
Renton, WA 68.5% 16th +9.2pp 4th on par with peers
Sugar Land, TX 63.6% 20th +8.2pp 5th 7% below peers
Spokane Valley, WA 61.8% 22nd +7.2pp 6th 10% below peers
Chico, CA 69.9% 13th +7.6pp 7th 2% above peers
San Tan Valley, AZ 56.6% 29th +4.0pp 8th 17% below peers
Bend, OR 64.7% 19th +4.4pp 9th 6% below peers
Jurupa Valley, CA 60.0% 25th +3.8pp 10th 12% below peers
Fishers, IN 77.3% 3rd +4.8pp 11th 13% above peers
Costa Mesa, CA 71.0% 9th +4.4pp 12th 4% above peers
Georgetown, TX 72.2% 5th +3.3pp 13th 5% above peers
Columbia, MD 78.2% 2nd +2.9pp 14th 14% above peers
Suffolk, VA 69.2% 15th +2.5pp 15th 1% above peers
Downey, CA 70.6% 11th +2.3pp 16th 3% above peers
El Monte, CA 63.5% 21st +1.8pp 17th 7% below peers
San Mateo, CA 76.2% 4th +2.0pp 18th 11% above peers
Rialto, CA 61.0% 24th +1.5pp 19th 11% below peers
Centennial, CO 71.5% 7th +1.2pp 20th 4% above peers
Brockton, MA 80.7% 1st +0.4pp 21st 18% above peers
West Covina, CA 70.0% 12th -1.0pp 22nd 2% above peers
Carmel, IN 68.3% 17th -1.4pp 23rd on par with peers
Vacaville, CA 58.9% 27th -1.4pp 24th 14% below peers
Lynn, MA 71.2% 8th -2.6pp 25th 4% above peers
Yuma, AZ 59.2% 26th -3.2pp 26th 14% below peers
Lee's Summit, MO 69.7% 14th -5.1pp 27th 2% above peers
Boulder, CO 66.5% 18th -4.9pp 28th 3% below peers
Green Bay, WI 70.9% 10th -5.6pp 29th 3% above peers
Fayetteville, AR 61.8% 23rd -6.0pp 30th 10% below peers
St. George, UT 45.7% 30th -7.2pp 31st 33% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 19 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsYoung children with all parents in the labor force
Loading tract map…
1 of 19 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B23008) through 2024 ±6.0pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Demographics data →