DataWorks Commons
Palm Beach Gardens, FL
← All cities

Palm Beach Gardens, FL

See all data for this place →
60,959 people (2024) 50k-100k South

Bright spots 9 indicators

Where Palm Beach Gardens, FL shows a real improvement in recent years, or stands clearly ahead of its peers. How this is calculated →

What needs attention 6 indicators

Where Palm Beach Gardens, FL shows a real worsening in recent years, or trails its peers clearly. How this is calculated →

Big shifts 5 indicators

Real moves and big gaps, where neither direction is simply good or bad. Biggest relative change first; big-gap cards come last. How this is calculated →

All indicators

Economy
Economy

Median household income

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Household income rose about 22% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from $87,969 to $106,947 (each survey's own dollars, not adjusted for inflation) - more than the combined survey margin (±$6,864). 30 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the stronger third of similar-size cities and kept improving; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 30 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: household income rose about 59% from 2014 to 2024 ($67,102 to $106,947).
$106,947
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Florida ref $74,568 +34%
United States ref $80,734 +28%
Santa Cruz, CA $115,475 6th +48% 1st 34% above peers
Florence-Graham, CA $65,132 26th +47% 2nd 24% below peers
Springfield, OR $68,761 24th +44% 3rd 20% below peers
La Mesa, CA $95,028 11th +44% 4th 11% above peers
Montebello, CA $79,971 18th +42% 5th 7% below peers
Encinitas, CA $162,229 1st +40% 6th 89% above peers
Revere, MA $86,969 15th +39% 7th 1% above peers
North Miami, FL $57,188 30th +37% 8th 33% below peers
Madison, AL $134,655 2nd +36% 9th 57% above peers
Great Falls, MT $63,373 28th +35% 10th 26% below peers
Palm Harbor, FL $78,935 21st +33% 11th 8% below peers
Casa Grande, AZ $69,983 23rd +32% 12th 19% below peers
Pico Rivera, CA $88,201 14th +30% 13th 3% above peers
San Rafael, CA $119,435 5th +30% 14th 39% above peers
Owensboro, KY $56,357 31st +30% 15th 34% below peers
Shoreline, WA $112,751 7th +30% 16th 31% above peers
Woodland, CA $90,180 12th +30% 17th 5% above peers
Stonecrest, GA $64,591 27th +30% 18th 25% below peers
Wylie, TX $119,522 4th +29% 19th 39% above peers
Jupiter, FL $110,240 9th +28% 20th 28% above peers
Taunton, MA $79,283 19th +26% 21st 8% below peers
Euless, TX $82,167 17th +25% 22nd 4% below peers
Vineland, NJ $67,860 25th +25% 23rd 21% below peers
White Plains, NY $110,763 8th +22% 24th 29% above peers
Palm Beach Gardens, FL $106,947 10th +22% 25th 24% above peers
Dearborn Heights, MI $60,391 29th +21% 26th 30% below peers
Meriden, CT $71,253 22nd +21% 27th 17% below peers
Parker, CO $133,369 3rd +20% 28th 55% above peers
Blue Springs, MO $88,920 13th +17% 29th 3% above peers
Bristol, CT $79,076 20th +17% 30th 8% below peers
Chapel Hill, NC $85,989 16th +17% 31st on par with peers
Where is this changing? 15 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyMedian household income
Loading tract map…
3 of 15 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 1 has too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Palo Alto, CA up about 46% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 95% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Dublin, CA up about 43% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 92% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Bentonville, AR up about 40% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 88% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±$5,750 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Unemployment rate

▼ Lower is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Unemployment rose about 0.2 percentage points a year from 2022 to 2025. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening faster than 63% of similar-size cities over 2022-2025.
Longer view: unemployment fell about 0.1 percentage points a year from 2015 to 2025.
Most recent monthly reading: 4.0% in May 2026, up from 3.1% a year earlier.
4.0%
1990May 2026
Compare all 29 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Florida ref 4.8% (May 26) +1.1pp
United States ref 4.2% (Jun 26) +0.1pp
Vineland, NJ 6.1% (May 26) 29th -1.2pp 1st 52% above peers
Blue Springs, MO 3.1% (May 26) 4th -0.7pp 2nd 22% below peers
Woodland, CA 5.6% (May 26) 27th -0.5pp 3rd 40% above peers
San Rafael, CA 3.1% (May 26) 5th -0.4pp 4th 22% below peers
Parker, CO 3.2% (May 26) 6th -0.4pp 5th 20% below peers
Revere, MA 4.2% (May 26) 17th -0.3pp 6th 5% above peers
Pico Rivera, CA 5.3% (May 26) 24th -0.2pp 7th 32% above peers
Stonecrest, GA 4.1% (May 26) 16th -0.1pp 8th 2% above peers
La Mesa, CA 3.8% (May 26) 10th -0.1pp 9th 5% below peers
Great Falls, MT 2.8% (May 26) 2nd -0.1pp 10th 30% below peers
Encinitas, CA 3.2% (May 26) 7th -0.1pp 11th 20% below peers
Springfield, OR 4.9% (May 26) 20th +0.0pp 12th 23% above peers
North Miami, FL 3.0% (May 26) 3rd +0.1pp 13th 25% below peers
Santa Cruz, CA 3.9% (May 26) 12th +0.1pp 14th 3% below peers
Chapel Hill, NC 3.6% (May 26) 9th +0.1pp 15th 10% below peers
Taunton, MA 4.9% (May 26) 21st +0.1pp 16th 23% above peers
Montebello, CA 5.3% (May 26) 25th +0.2pp 17th 32% above peers
Owensboro, KY 4.5% (May 26) 18th +0.2pp 18th 12% above peers
Wylie, TX 3.8% (May 26) 11th +0.4pp 19th 5% below peers
Euless, TX 4.0% (May 26) 13th +0.5pp 20th on par with peers
Dearborn Heights, MI 5.5% (May 26) 26th +0.6pp 21st 38% above peers
Casa Grande, AZ 5.2% (May 26) 23rd +0.6pp 22nd 30% above peers
White Plains, NY 3.5% (May 26) 8th +0.8pp 23rd 12% below peers
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 4.0% (May 26) 14th +0.9pp 24th on par with peers
Madison, AL 2.7% (May 26) 1st +0.9pp 25th 32% below peers
Jupiter, FL 4.0% (May 26) 15th +1.0pp 26th on par with peers
Shoreline, WA 4.8% (May 26) 19th +1.1pp 27th 20% above peers
Bristol, CT 5.1% (May 26) 22nd +1.2pp 28th 27% above peers
Meriden, CT 6.0% (May 26) 28th +1.3pp 29th 50% above peers
Economy

Share of people below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Poverty changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (6.2% then, 7.2% now; margin ±1.3pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 5 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: poverty rose 1.0 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (6.1% to 7.2%).
7.2%
20112024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Florida ref 11.9% -1.5pp
United States ref 12.0%
Woodland, CA 8.1% 8th -2.8pp 1st 29% below peers
Madison, AL 4.2% 1st -1.3pp 2nd 63% below peers
Springfield, OR 14.8% 25th -4.3pp 3rd 30% above peers
Euless, TX 7.8% 7th -2.1pp 4th 32% below peers
Florence-Graham, CA 20.0% 30th -4.9pp 5th 75% above peers
Santa Cruz, CA 14.4% 23rd -3.3pp 6th 27% above peers
Montebello, CA 11.9% 18th -1.9pp 7th 5% above peers
Casa Grande, AZ 13.4% 21st -2.1pp 8th 17% above peers
Owensboro, KY 18.3% 28th -2.6pp 9th 61% above peers
Wylie, TX 5.6% 3rd -0.8pp 10th 51% below peers
Revere, MA 11.4% 17th -1.2pp 11th 1% above peers
La Mesa, CA 11.4% 15th -1.1pp 12th on par with peers
White Plains, NY 11.1% 14th -1.0pp 13th 3% below peers
Taunton, MA 12.9% 19th -1.2pp 14th 13% above peers
North Miami, FL 18.4% 29th -1.5pp 15th 62% above peers
Chapel Hill, NC 15.3% 26th -0.8pp 16th 34% above peers
San Rafael, CA 11.4% 16th -0.5pp 17th on par with peers
Blue Springs, MO 6.9% 4th -0.2pp 18th 39% below peers
Great Falls, MT 14.2% 22nd -0.1pp 19th 25% above peers
Bristol, CT 10.6% 13th +0.6pp 20th 7% below peers
Vineland, NJ 14.4% 24th +1.1pp 21st 27% above peers
Stonecrest, GA 16.6% 27th +1.3pp 22nd 46% above peers
Encinitas, CA 7.3% 6th +0.9pp 23rd 36% below peers
Shoreline, WA 8.7% 9th +1.1pp 24th 23% below peers
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 7.2% 5th +1.0pp 25th 37% below peers
Jupiter, FL 9.4% 10th +1.3pp 26th 18% below peers
Pico Rivera, CA 10.2% 12th +1.5pp 27th 10% below peers
Dearborn Heights, MI 21.7% 31st +3.3pp 28th 91% above peers
Meriden, CT 13.0% 20th +2.7pp 29th 15% above peers
Parker, CO 4.4% 2nd +1.1pp 30th 61% below peers
Palm Harbor, FL 10.1% 11th +3.0pp 31st 11% below peers
Where is this changing? 15 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of people below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
3 of 15 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 1 has too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Apex, NC down 2.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Eagle Mountain, UT down 3.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Westfield, IN down 2.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.0pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Share of children below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Child poverty rose 3.5 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 2.7% to 6.2% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.5pp). That reverses the previous span, which went down between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys. None of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 7 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: child poverty rose 1.1 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (5.1% to 6.2%).
6.2%
20132024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Florida ref 16.5% -3.6pp
United States ref 16.1%
Madison, AL 3.4% 1st -4.6pp 1st 77% below peers
Woodland, CA 7.6% 8th -7.9pp 2nd 48% below peers
Euless, TX 7.6% 7th -5.3pp 3rd 48% below peers
Santa Cruz, CA 9.5% 9th -5.1pp 4th 35% below peers
Casa Grande, AZ 16.8% 18th -5.8pp 5th 15% above peers
Springfield, OR 18.3% 21st -6.1pp 6th 26% above peers
Wylie, TX 6.8% 4th -1.8pp 7th 53% below peers
Owensboro, KY 25.4% 28th -6.6pp 8th 74% above peers
Revere, MA 14.3% 15th -3.6pp 9th 2% below peers
Montebello, CA 18.7% 23rd -3.8pp 10th 29% above peers
North Miami, FL 27.7% 29th -5.5pp 11th 91% above peers
Chapel Hill, NC 6.9% 5th -1.2pp 12th 53% below peers
Florence-Graham, CA 30.1% 30th -4.2pp 13th 107% above peers
Taunton, MA 20.4% 27th -2.2pp 14th 40% above peers
Stonecrest, GA 19.4% 26th -0.9pp 15th 33% above peers
Blue Springs, MO 10.2% 10th -0.4pp 16th 30% below peers
La Mesa, CA 14.6% 16th +0.6pp 17th on par with peers
Jupiter, FL 10.7% 11th +0.6pp 18th 27% below peers
San Rafael, CA 18.6% 22nd +1.0pp 19th 28% above peers
Great Falls, MT 19.3% 24th +1.2pp 20th 32% above peers
Parker, CO 3.4% 2nd +0.2pp 21st 77% below peers
Vineland, NJ 17.1% 19th +1.2pp 22nd 18% above peers
White Plains, NY 18.0% 20th +1.3pp 23rd 24% above peers
Pico Rivera, CA 12.3% 14th +1.4pp 24th 16% below peers
Dearborn Heights, MI 32.1% 31st +4.0pp 25th 120% above peers
Bristol, CT 16.3% 17th +2.5pp 26th 12% above peers
Meriden, CT 19.4% 25th +3.0pp 27th 33% above peers
Shoreline, WA 7.4% 6th +1.3pp 28th 49% below peers
Palm Harbor, FL 10.8% 12th +2.9pp 29th 26% below peers
Encinitas, CA 11.0% 13th +4.5pp 30th 24% below peers
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 6.2% 3rd +3.5pp 31st 57% below peers
Where is this changing? 15 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of children below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
3 of 15 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 1 has too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Westfield, IN down 6.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Catalina Foothills, AZ down 5.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Apex, NC down 4.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±2.1pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Households with a broadband internet subscription

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Broadband rose 2.3 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 93.3% to 95.6% - more than the combined survey margin (±1.5pp). 28 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the stronger third of similar-size cities and kept improving; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 28 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: broadband rose 6.8 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (88.8% to 95.6%).
95.6%
20172024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Florida ref 91.7% +8.4pp
United States ref 91.1%
North Miami, FL 84.2% 31st +14.4pp 1st 9% below peers
Great Falls, MT 90.3% 25th +12.9pp 2nd 2% below peers
Florence-Graham, CA 86.9% 30th +12.2pp 3rd 6% below peers
Montebello, CA 89.6% 28th +12.2pp 4th 3% below peers
Meriden, CT 90.1% 26th +12.1pp 5th 3% below peers
Vineland, NJ 90.9% 21st +11.6pp 6th 2% below peers
Pico Rivera, CA 91.3% 19th +11.3pp 7th 1% below peers
Dearborn Heights, MI 91.2% 20th +11.1pp 8th 2% below peers
Taunton, MA 90.7% 23rd +10.0pp 9th 2% below peers
Bristol, CT 92.6% 16th +9.6pp 10th on par with peers
Stonecrest, GA 91.5% 18th +9.3pp 11th 1% below peers
Revere, MA 89.8% 27th +8.3pp 12th 3% below peers
Owensboro, KY 89.5% 29th +7.9pp 13th 3% below peers
Springfield, OR 92.3% 17th +7.7pp 14th on par with peers
Casa Grande, AZ 92.9% 15th +7.4pp 15th on par with peers
Blue Springs, MO 94.5% 11th +6.2pp 16th 2% above peers
Jupiter, FL 95.1% 8th +6.1pp 17th 3% above peers
Woodland, CA 90.8% 22nd +5.6pp 18th 2% below peers
Palm Harbor, FL 90.5% 24th +5.5pp 19th 2% below peers
San Rafael, CA 94.7% 10th +5.6pp 20th 2% above peers
Santa Cruz, CA 95.9% 4th +5.0pp 21st 3% above peers
Euless, TX 95.5% 7th +4.4pp 22nd 3% above peers
White Plains, NY 94.8% 9th +4.0pp 23rd 2% above peers
Wylie, TX 97.1% 2nd +4.0pp 24th 5% above peers
Encinitas, CA 96.4% 3rd +3.9pp 25th 4% above peers
Shoreline, WA 93.8% 12th +3.8pp 26th 1% above peers
Chapel Hill, NC 93.3% 14th +3.5pp 27th 1% above peers
Madison, AL 95.7% 5th +2.8pp 28th 3% above peers
La Mesa, CA 93.5% 13th +2.4pp 29th 1% above peers
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 95.6% 6th +2.3pp 30th 3% above peers
Parker, CO 98.3% 1st +2.0pp 31st 6% above peers
Where is this changing? 15 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds with a broadband internet subscription
Loading tract map…
3 of 15 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 1 has too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Wheaton, MD up 6.5pp between its surveys · a smaller real gain than 52% of this group · 2019-2024
  • South San Francisco, CA up 6.3pp between its surveys · a smaller real gain than 54% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Chino, CA up 6.0pp between its surveys · a smaller real gain than 56% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.5pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Income inequality (Gini index)

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Inequality changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (0.52 then, 0.55 now; margin ±0.03).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 7 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: inequality rose about 5% from 2014 to 2024 (0.52 to 0.55).
0.55
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Florida ref 0.49 -0.001
United States ref 0.48 +0.001
North Miami, FL 0.44 15th -0.058 1st 1% below peers
Madison, AL 0.38 3rd -0.030 2nd 13% below peers
Encinitas, CA 0.46 21st -0.034 3rd 4% above peers
Bristol, CT 0.41 8th -0.025 4th 8% below peers
Great Falls, MT 0.46 20th -0.022 5th 4% above peers
Santa Cruz, CA 0.49 26th -0.020 6th 11% above peers
Springfield, OR 0.40 5th -0.013 7th 10% below peers
Woodland, CA 0.42 9th -0.013 8th 5% below peers
Taunton, MA 0.43 10th -0.014 9th 3% below peers
Florence-Graham, CA 0.41 7th -0.010 10th 9% below peers
Vineland, NJ 0.45 17th -0.011 11th 2% above peers
Euless, TX 0.40 4th -0.007 12th 10% below peers
White Plains, NY 0.51 27th -0.009 13th 15% above peers
La Mesa, CA 0.43 11th -0.006 14th 3% below peers
Jupiter, FL 0.52 29th -0.002 15th 17% above peers
Revere, MA 0.45 19th -0.001 16th 2% above peers
Chapel Hill, NC 0.55 30th +0.000 17th 24% above peers
Montebello, CA 0.44 13th +0.002 18th 1% below peers
Owensboro, KY 0.49 25th +0.007 19th 10% above peers
San Rafael, CA 0.51 28th +0.012 20th 15% above peers
Dearborn Heights, MI 0.46 22nd +0.020 21st 4% above peers
Meriden, CT 0.43 12th +0.021 22nd 2% below peers
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 0.55 31st +0.027 23rd 24% above peers
Shoreline, WA 0.45 18th +0.022 24th 2% above peers
Palm Harbor, FL 0.47 23rd +0.024 25th 7% above peers
Blue Springs, MO 0.40 6th +0.022 26th 9% below peers
Stonecrest, GA 0.44 16th +0.028 27th on par with peers
Parker, CO 0.38 2nd +0.026 28th 15% below peers
Pico Rivera, CA 0.44 14th +0.038 29th 1% below peers
Casa Grande, AZ 0.48 24th +0.045 30th 7% above peers
Wylie, TX 0.37 1st +0.051 31st 17% below peers
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B19083) through 2024 ±0.02 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Households receiving SNAP

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

SNAP changed less than the survey can measure between the 2014-2018 and 2019-2023 surveys (2.6% then, 2.7% now; margin ±1.2pp).

Within the survey margin, 2014-2018 vs 2019-2023 surveys; 8 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: snap fell 0.9 percentage points from 2013 to 2023 (3.6% to 2.7%).
2.7%
20102023
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2019-2023 survey Today's rank Change2014-2018 → 2019-2023 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Florida ref 12.6% -1.6pp
United States ref 11.8% -0.5pp
Meriden, CT 20.3% 27th -8.3pp 1st 62% above peers
Chapel Hill, NC 4.3% 5th -1.2pp 2nd 66% below peers
Casa Grande, AZ 13.1% 17th -3.1pp 3rd 5% above peers
Blue Springs, MO 5.4% 8th -1.2pp 4th 57% below peers
Wylie, TX 4.9% 7th -0.9pp 5th 61% below peers
Shoreline, WA 7.7% 13th -1.4pp 6th 38% below peers
Encinitas, CA 2.0% 1st -0.3pp 7th 84% below peers
Euless, TX 6.3% 10th -1.0pp 8th 49% below peers
Palm Harbor, FL 5.6% 9th -0.8pp 9th 56% below peers
Florence-Graham, CA 21.5% 28th -3.0pp 10th 72% above peers
White Plains, NY 6.7% 12th -0.7pp 11th 47% below peers
Stonecrest, GA 18.5% 25th -1.8pp 12th 48% above peers
North Miami, FL 25.4% 30th -2.2pp 13th 103% above peers
La Mesa, CA 8.3% 14th -0.6pp 14th 34% below peers
Springfield, OR 26.7% 31st -1.5pp 15th 113% above peers
Madison, AL 4.6% 6th -0.2pp 16th 63% below peers
Bristol, CT 15.3% 21st -0.3pp 17th 23% above peers
Vineland, NJ 15.4% 22nd -0.0pp 18th 23% above peers
Owensboro, KY 15.3% 20th +0.8pp 19th 22% above peers
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 2.7% 2nd +0.2pp 20th 78% below peers
Great Falls, MT 12.5% 16th +0.9pp 21st on par with peers
Dearborn Heights, MI 19.3% 26th +1.8pp 22nd 54% above peers
Jupiter, FL 3.3% 3rd +0.3pp 23rd 73% below peers
Woodland, CA 14.0% 18th +1.4pp 24th 12% above peers
Santa Cruz, CA 10.4% 15th +2.1pp 25th 17% below peers
Taunton, MA 24.5% 29th +5.2pp 26th 96% above peers
San Rafael, CA 6.5% 11th +1.7pp 27th 48% below peers
Revere, MA 17.9% 24th +4.7pp 28th 43% above peers
Montebello, CA 17.4% 23rd +5.7pp 29th 39% above peers
Pico Rivera, CA 14.3% 19th +5.1pp 30th 14% above peers
Parker, CO 3.5% 4th +1.3pp 31st 72% below peers
Where is this changing? 15 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2018 to 2023, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds receiving SNAP
Loading tract map…
3 of 15 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 1 has too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Queen Creek, AZ down 2.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2018-2023
  • El Dorado Hills, CA down 1.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2018-2023
  • South Jordan, UT down 1.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2018-2023
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2023 ±1.0pp at 90% confidence (2023 estimate) survey trend: 2014-2018 vs 2019-2023 surveys about this metric
See all Economy data →
Housing
Housing

Typical home value

No better direction Rising recently
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Home value rose about 1% over the 12 months ending June 2026, slower than 59% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: home value rose about 4% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 55% of similar-size cities.
Longer view: home value rose about 11% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: $696,721 in June 2026, up from $693,245 a year earlier.
$696,721
2000June 2026
Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Florida ref $378,126 (Jun 26) -2.8%
United States ref $372,995 (Jun 26) +0.8%
Bristol, CT $353,528 (Jun 26) 23rd +5.7% 1st 37% below peers
Meriden, CT $329,605 (Jun 26) 25th +4.6% 2nd 41% below peers
White Plains, NY $804,471 (Jun 26) 7th +4.4% 3rd 44% above peers
Santa Cruz, CA $1,365,773 (Jun 26) 2nd +4.3% 4th 145% above peers
Dearborn Heights, MI $221,126 (Jun 26) 29th +4.1% 5th 60% below peers
Encinitas, CA $1,937,012 (Jun 26) 1st +4.0% 6th 248% above peers
Taunton, MA $528,720 (Jun 26) 16th +3.7% 7th 5% below peers
Great Falls, MT $342,814 (Jun 26) 24th +3.6% 8th 38% below peers
Vineland, NJ $314,721 (Jun 26) 27th +2.6% 9th 43% below peers
Owensboro, KY $216,394 (Jun 26) 30th +2.6% 10th 61% below peers
Blue Springs, MO $314,477 (Jun 26) 28th +1.8% 11th 44% below peers
San Rafael, CA $1,340,153 (Jun 26) 3rd +1.6% 12th 141% above peers
Montebello, CA $831,401 (Jun 26) 5th +1.5% 13th 49% above peers
Pico Rivera, CA $756,477 (Jun 26) 8th +1.0% 14th 36% above peers
Florence-Graham, CA $599,360 (Jun 26) 14th +0.9% 15th 8% above peers
Madison, AL $379,055 (Jun 26) 21st +0.8% 16th 32% below peers
Springfield, OR $423,728 (Jun 26) 18th +0.5% 17th 24% below peers
Palm Beach Gardens, FL $696,721 (Jun 26) 10th +0.5% 18th 25% above peers
Revere, MA $624,318 (Jun 26) 13th +0.4% 19th 12% above peers
La Mesa, CA $900,788 (Jun 26) 4th -0.3% 20th 62% above peers
Euless, TX $359,527 (Jun 26) 22nd -0.8% 21st 35% below peers
Chapel Hill, NC $642,319 (Jun 26) 12th -1.1% 22nd 15% above peers
North Miami, FL $424,771 (Jun 26) 17th -1.1% 23rd 24% below peers
Woodland, CA $556,780 (Jun 26) 15th -1.3% 24th on par with peers
Jupiter, FL $702,538 (Jun 26) 9th -1.3% 25th 26% above peers
Casa Grande, AZ $319,278 (Jun 26) 26th -1.6% 26th 43% below peers
Parker, CO $687,773 (Jun 26) 11th -2.5% 27th 24% above peers
Shoreline, WA $812,220 (Jun 26) 6th -2.8% 28th 46% above peers
Palm Harbor, FL $402,681 (Jun 26) 20th -3.5% 29th 28% below peers
Wylie, TX $423,647 (Jun 26) 19th -6.3% 30th 24% below peers
Housing

Starter home value (bottom tier)

No better direction Falling recently, faster than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Starter homes fell about 1% over the 12 months ending June 2026, faster than 69% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: starter homes rose about 5% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 59% of similar-size cities.
Longer view: starter homes rose about 10% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: $377,442 in June 2026, down from $383,162 a year earlier.
$377,442
2000June 2026
Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Florida ref $233,930 (Jun 26) -3.8%
United States ref $202,486 (Jun 26) +2.0%
Bristol, CT $273,177 (Jun 26) 21st +6.3% 1st 28% below peers
White Plains, NY $462,610 (Jun 26) 10th +6.0% 2nd 22% above peers
Santa Cruz, CA $969,823 (Jun 26) 2nd +5.8% 3rd 155% above peers
Meriden, CT $253,295 (Jun 26) 23rd +5.6% 4th 33% below peers
Vineland, NJ $249,107 (Jun 26) 26th +5.0% 5th 35% below peers
Dearborn Heights, MI $158,956 (Jun 26) 29th +4.4% 6th 58% below peers
Taunton, MA $414,629 (Jun 26) 14th +4.3% 7th 9% above peers
Great Falls, MT $258,298 (Jun 26) 22nd +4.3% 8th 32% below peers
Encinitas, CA $1,257,106 (Jun 26) 1st +3.9% 9th 231% above peers
Florence-Graham, CA $528,148 (Jun 26) 9th +3.1% 10th 39% above peers
Blue Springs, MO $251,538 (Jun 26) 24th +2.4% 11th 34% below peers
Owensboro, KY $141,998 (Jun 26) 30th +1.9% 12th 63% below peers
Pico Rivera, CA $685,452 (Jun 26) 4th +1.6% 13th 80% above peers
Montebello, CA $677,771 (Jun 26) 5th +1.4% 14th 78% above peers
Madison, AL $273,783 (Jun 26) 20th +1.4% 15th 28% below peers
San Rafael, CA $816,898 (Jun 26) 3rd +1.0% 16th 115% above peers
Springfield, OR $348,584 (Jun 26) 17th +0.1% 17th 8% below peers
La Mesa, CA $663,940 (Jun 26) 6th -0.2% 18th 75% above peers
Revere, MA $452,278 (Jun 26) 12th -0.3% 19th 19% above peers
Woodland, CA $460,541 (Jun 26) 11th -1.0% 20th 21% above peers
Palm Beach Gardens, FL $377,442 (Jun 26) 16th -1.5% 21st 1% below peers
Casa Grande, AZ $250,624 (Jun 26) 25th -1.9% 22nd 34% below peers
Euless, TX $277,422 (Jun 26) 19th -2.0% 23rd 27% below peers
Shoreline, WA $614,110 (Jun 26) 7th -2.0% 24th 61% above peers
Parker, CO $552,311 (Jun 26) 8th -2.2% 25th 45% above peers
Jupiter, FL $431,361 (Jun 26) 13th -2.2% 26th 13% above peers
Chapel Hill, NC $380,362 (Jun 26) 15th -2.4% 27th on par with peers
Wylie, TX $331,918 (Jun 26) 18th -5.9% 28th 13% below peers
Palm Harbor, FL $224,256 (Jun 26) 27th -6.4% 29th 41% below peers
North Miami, FL $197,133 (Jun 26) 28th -6.8% 30th 48% below peers
Housing

Homeownership rate

▲ Higher is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Homeownership changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (73.9% then, 73.0% now; margin ±2.5pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 13 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: homeownership rose 1.8 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (71.2% to 73.0%).
73.0%
20112024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Florida ref 67.6% +2.2pp
United States ref 65.2%
Stonecrest, GA 56.2% 20th +11.6pp 1st 9% below peers
La Mesa, CA 47.7% 25th +6.1pp 2nd 23% below peers
Casa Grande, AZ 72.8% 6th +7.2pp 3rd 17% above peers
Woodland, CA 58.7% 18th +4.4pp 4th 5% below peers
Palm Harbor, FL 77.9% 2nd +5.1pp 5th 25% above peers
Montebello, CA 45.9% 27th +2.7pp 6th 26% below peers
Jupiter, FL 78.5% 1st +4.5pp 7th 26% above peers
San Rafael, CA 53.0% 22nd +3.0pp 8th 15% below peers
Vineland, NJ 69.9% 10th +4.0pp 9th 13% above peers
Great Falls, MT 66.1% 14th +3.5pp 10th 6% above peers
Encinitas, CA 66.5% 12th +3.2pp 11th 7% above peers
Springfield, OR 55.0% 21st +2.4pp 12th 11% below peers
Madison, AL 74.0% 4th +3.1pp 13th 19% above peers
Shoreline, WA 66.3% 13th +2.6pp 14th 7% above peers
Meriden, CT 60.1% 17th +2.1pp 15th 3% below peers
Pico Rivera, CA 70.5% 8th +2.3pp 16th 14% above peers
Santa Cruz, CA 48.4% 24th +1.4pp 17th 22% below peers
North Miami, FL 43.5% 29th +1.2pp 18th 30% below peers
Bristol, CT 64.9% 15th +1.3pp 19th 5% above peers
Owensboro, KY 57.4% 19th +0.5pp 20th 8% below peers
Taunton, MA 62.1% 16th -0.3pp 21st on par with peers
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 73.0% 5th -0.9pp 22nd 18% above peers
Florence-Graham, CA 36.6% 31st -0.5pp 23rd 41% below peers
Wylie, TX 77.4% 3rd -1.1pp 24th 25% above peers
White Plains, NY 51.0% 23rd -0.8pp 25th 18% below peers
Dearborn Heights, MI 70.5% 9th -1.7pp 26th 13% above peers
Blue Springs, MO 68.9% 11th -2.4pp 27th 11% above peers
Chapel Hill, NC 47.4% 26th -2.9pp 28th 24% below peers
Parker, CO 71.8% 7th -4.7pp 29th 16% above peers
Revere, MA 45.5% 28th -4.3pp 30th 27% below peers
Euless, TX 39.8% 30th -4.1pp 31st 36% below peers
Where is this changing? 15 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHomeownership rate
Loading tract map…
3 of 15 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 1 has too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.8pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Housing

Typical asking rent

No better direction Rising recently, faster than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Rent rose about 4% over the 12 months ending June 2026, faster than 74% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: rent rose about 4% a year from 2021 to 2026, slower than 56% of similar-size cities.
Longer view: rent rose about 10% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: $2,725 in June 2026, up from $2,628 a year earlier.
$2,725
2015June 2026
Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
United States ref $1,965 (Jun 26) +2.2%
Taunton, MA $2,124 (Jun 26) 15th +5.8% 1st on par with peers
Pico Rivera, CA $2,169 (Jun 26) 14th +5.6% 2nd 2% above peers
White Plains, NY $3,228 (Jun 26) 3rd +5.4% 3rd 52% above peers
Great Falls, MT $1,367 (Jun 26) 29th +5.4% 4th 36% below peers
Owensboro, KY $1,121 (Jun 26) 30th +4.3% 5th 47% below peers
Bristol, CT $1,679 (Jun 26) 25th +4.0% 6th 21% below peers
Encinitas, CA $4,498 (Jun 26) 1st +3.9% 7th 112% above peers
Palm Beach Gardens, FL $2,725 (Jun 26) 7th +3.7% 8th 28% above peers
Santa Cruz, CA $3,649 (Jun 26) 2nd +3.6% 9th 72% above peers
Blue Springs, MO $1,730 (Jun 26) 22nd +3.4% 10th 19% below peers
Dearborn Heights, MI $1,459 (Jun 26) 27th +2.9% 11th 31% below peers
Shoreline, WA $2,042 (Jun 26) 16th +2.8% 12th 4% below peers
Meriden, CT $1,748 (Jun 26) 21st +2.5% 13th 18% below peers
San Rafael, CA $2,992 (Jun 26) 5th +2.4% 14th 41% above peers
La Mesa, CA $2,662 (Jun 26) 9th +1.7% 15th 25% above peers
North Miami, FL $2,330 (Jun 26) 12th +1.6% 16th 10% above peers
Casa Grande, AZ $1,711 (Jun 26) 23rd +1.6% 17th 19% below peers
Jupiter, FL $3,003 (Jun 26) 4th +1.4% 18th 41% above peers
Springfield, OR $1,693 (Jun 26) 24th +1.3% 19th 20% below peers
Montebello, CA $2,289 (Jun 26) 13th +1.2% 20th 8% above peers
Madison, AL $1,442 (Jun 26) 28th +1.2% 21st 32% below peers
Revere, MA $2,826 (Jun 26) 6th +0.9% 22nd 33% above peers
Woodland, CA $2,467 (Jun 26) 10th +0.7% 23rd 16% above peers
Euless, TX $1,567 (Jun 26) 26th +0.4% 24th 26% below peers
Chapel Hill, NC $1,763 (Jun 26) 20th -0.1% 25th 17% below peers
Wylie, TX $1,859 (Jun 26) 18th -0.6% 26th 12% below peers
Parker, CO $2,332 (Jun 26) 11th -2.5% 27th 10% above peers
Palm Harbor, FL $1,845 (Jun 26) 19th -3.2% 28th 13% below peers
Vineland, NJ 17th 5% below peers
Florence-Graham, CA 8th 26% above peers
Housing

Housing cost-burdened households

▼ Lower is better Turning up (early signal)
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Cost burden changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (32.3% then, 35.5% now; margin ±3.5pp). The newest releases lean upward: each of the last 3 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 8 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: cost burden fell 4.5 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (40.0% to 35.5%).
35.5%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Florida ref 37.7% +1.8pp
United States ref 32.2% +0.4pp
Santa Cruz, CA 40.3% 22nd -7.0pp 1st 9% above peers
Florence-Graham, CA 50.0% 30th -6.7pp 2nd 35% above peers
Stonecrest, GA 42.1% 25th -2.6pp 3rd 14% above peers
Encinitas, CA 35.5% 8th -2.1pp 4th 4% below peers
Owensboro, KY 30.2% 4th -1.4pp 5th 18% below peers
White Plains, NY 41.0% 23rd -1.9pp 6th 11% above peers
Vineland, NJ 39.1% 19th -1.7pp 7th 6% above peers
La Mesa, CA 44.9% 27th -1.9pp 8th 21% above peers
Great Falls, MT 28.0% 3rd -1.2pp 9th 24% below peers
Springfield, OR 37.0% 16th -1.1pp 10th on par with peers
Montebello, CA 46.3% 28th -1.4pp 11th 25% above peers
Taunton, MA 36.5% 13th -1.0pp 12th 1% below peers
North Miami, FL 56.8% 31st -0.2pp 13th 53% above peers
Blue Springs, MO 22.4% 2nd +0.2pp 14th 40% below peers
Wylie, TX 30.4% 5th +0.4pp 15th 18% below peers
Revere, MA 47.6% 29th +0.6pp 16th 29% above peers
San Rafael, CA 43.9% 26th +0.7pp 17th 18% above peers
Pico Rivera, CA 41.2% 24th +0.8pp 18th 11% above peers
Shoreline, WA 36.9% 15th +0.9pp 19th on par with peers
Casa Grande, AZ 32.7% 7th +2.2pp 20th 12% below peers
Jupiter, FL 38.1% 17th +2.8pp 21st 3% above peers
Bristol, CT 36.0% 10th +3.1pp 22nd 3% below peers
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 35.5% 9th +3.2pp 23rd 4% below peers
Woodland, CA 38.5% 18th +3.6pp 24th 4% above peers
Chapel Hill, NC 40.3% 21st +4.0pp 25th 9% above peers
Palm Harbor, FL 36.3% 12th +3.7pp 26th 2% below peers
Dearborn Heights, MI 36.3% 11th +5.0pp 27th 2% below peers
Madison, AL 18.9% 1st +2.9pp 28th 49% below peers
Parker, CO 31.1% 6th +5.3pp 29th 16% below peers
Euless, TX 36.6% 14th +6.6pp 30th 1% below peers
Meriden, CT 39.6% 20th +7.6pp 31st 7% above peers
Where is this changing? 15 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHousing cost-burdened households
Loading tract map…
3 of 15 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 1 has too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Tinley Park, IL down 4.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 97% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Appleton, WI down 3.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 96% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Decatur, IL down 3.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 93% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (tables B25070 + B25091) through 2024 ±2.8pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys *Early signal: consecutive releases agree on direction only; the size of the newest movement is not measurable from overlapping surveys. about this metric
Housing

Households without a vehicle

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

No vehicle changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (3.8% then, 4.8% now; margin ±1.8pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 3 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: no vehicle rose 0.2 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (4.5% to 4.8%).
4.8%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Florida ref 6.0% -0.4pp
United States ref 8.3% -0.3pp
Encinitas, CA 3.0% 4th -2.4pp 1st 59% below peers
Wylie, TX 1.3% 1st -0.8pp 2nd 82% below peers
Casa Grande, AZ 4.1% 8th -1.7pp 3rd 45% below peers
La Mesa, CA 6.1% 12th -1.9pp 4th 17% below peers
Blue Springs, MO 3.1% 5th -0.9pp 5th 59% below peers
Chapel Hill, NC 5.8% 10th -1.0pp 6th 21% below peers
Meriden, CT 10.1% 28th -1.6pp 7th 37% above peers
Bristol, CT 7.6% 18th -1.1pp 8th 3% above peers
Great Falls, MT 7.0% 14th -1.0pp 9th 5% below peers
Madison, AL 2.0% 3rd -0.2pp 10th 73% below peers
Woodland, CA 7.0% 13th -0.7pp 11th 6% below peers
Taunton, MA 9.5% 25th -0.9pp 12th 28% above peers
Springfield, OR 8.3% 22nd -0.8pp 13th 12% above peers
Vineland, NJ 8.2% 21st -0.7pp 14th 11% above peers
Montebello, CA 7.5% 17th -0.6pp 15th 2% above peers
North Miami, FL 11.9% 29th -0.8pp 16th 61% above peers
White Plains, NY 17.1% 30th +0.2pp 17th 130% above peers
Florence-Graham, CA 9.8% 26th +0.1pp 18th 32% above peers
Revere, MA 18.4% 31st +0.5pp 19th 148% above peers
Owensboro, KY 9.8% 27th +0.3pp 20th 32% above peers
Dearborn Heights, MI 6.0% 11th +0.3pp 21st 19% below peers
Santa Cruz, CA 8.0% 20th +0.5pp 22nd 8% above peers
Shoreline, WA 7.1% 15th +0.4pp 23rd 4% below peers
Parker, CO 1.7% 2nd +0.2pp 24th 77% below peers
Stonecrest, GA 8.6% 23rd +1.1pp 25th 16% above peers
San Rafael, CA 8.7% 24th +1.8pp 26th 17% above peers
Pico Rivera, CA 7.4% 16th +1.6pp 27th on par with peers
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 4.8% 9th +1.0pp 28th 35% below peers
Jupiter, FL 3.8% 7th +1.0pp 29th 48% below peers
Euless, TX 3.5% 6th +1.4pp 30th 53% below peers
Palm Harbor, FL 7.7% 19th +3.1pp 31st 4% above peers
Where is this changing? 15 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHouseholds without a vehicle
Loading tract map…
3 of 15 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 1 has too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Apopka, FL down 2.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Sandy, UT down 1.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Mount Pleasant, SC down 1.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B08201) through 2024 ±1.7pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Housing data →
Health
Health

People without health insurance

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (6.4% then, 6.9% now; margin ±1.6pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 11 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: uninsured fell 3.5 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (10.4% to 6.9%).
6.9%
20122024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Florida ref 11.0% -1.3pp
United States ref 8.2% -0.4pp
White Plains, NY 5.8% 13th -3.6pp 1st 10% below peers
Shoreline, WA 3.7% 2nd -1.8pp 2nd 43% below peers
Palm Harbor, FL 6.5% 16th -2.8pp 3rd on par with peers
North Miami, FL 18.5% 31st -7.5pp 4th 184% above peers
Woodland, CA 5.2% 11th -2.1pp 5th 21% below peers
Encinitas, CA 3.8% 4th -1.2pp 6th 42% below peers
La Mesa, CA 4.8% 8th -1.3pp 7th 27% below peers
Stonecrest, GA 12.4% 27th -3.1pp 8th 90% above peers
Santa Cruz, CA 3.8% 3rd -0.9pp 9th 42% below peers
Great Falls, MT 6.8% 18th -1.3pp 10th 4% above peers
Madison, AL 3.9% 5th -0.4pp 11th 41% below peers
Florence-Graham, CA 15.4% 29th -1.2pp 12th 137% above peers
Pico Rivera, CA 8.8% 22nd -0.3pp 13th 35% above peers
Montebello, CA 10.8% 25th -0.3pp 14th 66% above peers
Springfield, OR 7.1% 20th -0.2pp 15th 9% above peers
Wylie, TX 13.0% 28th -0.3pp 16th 99% above peers
San Rafael, CA 6.7% 17th -0.1pp 17th 2% above peers
Dearborn Heights, MI 6.4% 15th -0.1pp 18th 1% below peers
Revere, MA 5.1% 10th -0.0pp 19th 22% below peers
Chapel Hill, NC 5.0% 9th +0.3pp 20th 22% below peers
Vineland, NJ 9.5% 23rd +0.6pp 21st 46% above peers
Jupiter, FL 9.9% 24th +0.7pp 22nd 53% above peers
Euless, TX 15.5% 30th +1.1pp 23rd 138% above peers
Owensboro, KY 5.9% 14th +0.4pp 24th 9% below peers
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 6.9% 19th +0.6pp 25th 7% above peers
Bristol, CT 4.5% 7th +0.5pp 26th 31% below peers
Meriden, CT 5.6% 12th +0.9pp 27th 13% below peers
Casa Grande, AZ 11.2% 26th +2.0pp 28th 72% above peers
Parker, CO 4.4% 6th +0.8pp 29th 32% below peers
Blue Springs, MO 7.5% 21st +2.1pp 30th 15% above peers
Taunton, MA 3.7% 1st +1.5pp 31st 43% below peers
Where is this changing? 15 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthPeople without health insurance
Loading tract map…
3 of 15 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 1 has too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Tigard, OR down 4.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Lenexa, KS down 3.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Lakewood, NJ down 3.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.3pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Health

Adult obesity

▼ Lower is better Level only
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Adult obesity is somewhat below the peer median.

26.2%
20202022
Compare all 31 similar-size cities best first
Place Latest Today's rank History Latest vs. peers
Florida ref 32.6%
United States ref 33.4%
Parker, CO 21.9% 1st 31% below peers
Encinitas, CA 23.2% 2nd 27% below peers
Shoreline, WA 23.8% 3rd 25% below peers
Chapel Hill, NC 25.5% 4th 19% below peers
San Rafael, CA 25.7% 5th 19% below peers
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 26.2% 6th 17% below peers
La Mesa, CA 26.6% 7th 16% below peers
Jupiter, FL 26.7% 8th 16% below peers
White Plains, NY 26.9% 9th 15% below peers
Revere, MA 28.1% 10th 11% below peers
Montebello, CA 28.2% 11th 11% below peers
Santa Cruz, CA 29.0% 12th 8% below peers
Woodland, CA 29.2% 13th 8% below peers
Pico Rivera, CA 29.9% 14th 5% below peers
Palm Harbor, FL 30.3% 15th 4% below peers
Madison, AL 31.6% 16th on par with peers
Wylie, TX 31.7% 17th on par with peers
Bristol, CT 32.5% 18th 3% above peers
Springfield, OR 33.8% 19th 7% above peers
North Miami, FL 34.1% 20th 8% above peers
Florence-Graham, CA 34.4% 21st 9% above peers
Taunton, MA 34.6% 22nd 9% above peers
Meriden, CT 35.1% 23rd 11% above peers
Dearborn Heights, MI 35.2% 24th 11% above peers
Vineland, NJ 35.8% 25th 13% above peers
Euless, TX 35.9% 26th 14% above peers
Great Falls, MT 36.2% 27th 15% above peers
Owensboro, KY 36.5% 28th 16% above peers
Blue Springs, MO 36.7% 29th 16% above peers
Casa Grande, AZ 39.6% 30th 25% above peers
Stonecrest, GA 39.7% 31st 26% above peers
CDC PLACES through 2022 modeled tract map about this metric
Health

Children without health insurance

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Child uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (6.5% then, 7.8% now; margin ±4.6pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 6 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: child uninsured fell 0.1 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (7.9% to 7.8%).
7.8%
20122024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Florida ref 7.5% +0.3pp
United States ref 5.5% +0.4pp
Stonecrest, GA 2.6% 11th -6.0pp 1st 26% below peers
Santa Cruz, CA 1.1% 2nd -2.2pp 2nd 68% below peers
North Miami, FL 6.6% 27th -5.9pp 3rd 91% above peers
Palm Harbor, FL 4.6% 21st -3.3pp 4th 34% above peers
Bristol, CT 0.9% 1st -0.7pp 5th 73% below peers
Chapel Hill, NC 2.9% 13th -2.0pp 6th 17% below peers
San Rafael, CA 1.8% 5th -1.0pp 7th 49% below peers
Shoreline, WA 1.6% 3rd -0.9pp 8th 54% below peers
Meriden, CT 1.7% 4th -0.9pp 9th 52% below peers
Woodland, CA 1.9% 8th -0.6pp 10th 46% below peers
Encinitas, CA 1.8% 7th -0.4pp 11th 47% below peers
Parker, CO 2.1% 9th -0.2pp 12th 39% below peers
Great Falls, MT 3.5% 17th -0.1pp 13th 2% above peers
White Plains, NY 3.5% 16th -0.0pp 14th on par with peers
Pico Rivera, CA 2.6% 12th +0.0pp 15th 25% below peers
Madison, AL 1.8% 6th +0.1pp 16th 49% below peers
Blue Springs, MO 5.6% 23rd +0.5pp 17th 61% above peers
La Mesa, CA 2.9% 14th +0.3pp 18th 15% below peers
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 7.8% 28th +1.3pp 19th 125% above peers
Jupiter, FL 6.2% 25th +1.2pp 20th 78% above peers
Vineland, NJ 5.2% 22nd +1.1pp 21st 51% above peers
Springfield, OR 3.6% 18th +0.8pp 22nd 5% above peers
Florence-Graham, CA 6.4% 26th +1.5pp 23rd 84% above peers
Euless, TX 14.9% 31st +3.6pp 24th 330% above peers
Wylie, TX 10.2% 29th +2.5pp 25th 195% above peers
Montebello, CA 4.6% 20th +1.4pp 26th 32% above peers
Revere, MA 2.6% 10th +1.1pp 27th 26% below peers
Dearborn Heights, MI 5.6% 24th +2.5pp 28th 61% above peers
Casa Grande, AZ 10.5% 30th +4.7pp 29th 205% above peers
Owensboro, KY 4.5% 19th +2.1pp 30th 31% above peers
Taunton, MA 3.1% 15th +2.9pp 31st 10% below peers
Where is this changing? 15 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthChildren without health insurance
Loading tract map…
3 of 15 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 1 has too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Grand Forks, ND down 5.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Columbus, IN down 6.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Norwalk, CT down 17.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B27001) through 2024 ±4.1pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Health data →
Education
Education

Adults with a bachelor's degree or higher

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

College attainment rose 5.0 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 52.4% to 57.4% - more than the combined survey margin (±3.5pp). 19 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the stronger third of similar-size cities and kept improving; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 19 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: college attainment rose 10.5 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (46.9% to 57.4%).
57.4%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Florida ref 34.1% +4.3pp
United States ref 35.7% +3.5pp
Florence-Graham, CA 7.4% 31st +2.0pp 1st 76% below peers
Casa Grande, AZ 21.7% 29th +5.4pp 2nd 30% below peers
North Miami, FL 25.1% 21st +6.1pp 3rd 19% below peers
Vineland, NJ 24.1% 23rd +5.3pp 4th 22% below peers
Pico Rivera, CA 16.4% 30th +3.4pp 5th 47% below peers
Springfield, OR 22.4% 27th +4.6pp 6th 28% below peers
Wylie, TX 43.3% 11th +7.0pp 7th 40% above peers
Palm Harbor, FL 40.6% 12th +6.5pp 8th 31% above peers
Montebello, CA 22.9% 26th +3.2pp 9th 26% below peers
Bristol, CT 30.3% 18th +3.8pp 10th 2% below peers
Owensboro, KY 26.1% 20th +3.1pp 11th 16% below peers
Jupiter, FL 53.5% 8th +5.7pp 12th 73% above peers
Woodland, CA 30.4% 17th +3.1pp 13th 2% below peers
Euless, TX 39.8% 14th +4.0pp 14th 29% above peers
Dearborn Heights, MI 23.8% 25th +2.3pp 15th 23% below peers
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 57.4% 5th +5.0pp 16th 85% above peers
Great Falls, MT 27.8% 19th +2.4pp 17th 10% below peers
Encinitas, CA 67.7% 2nd +5.7pp 18th 119% above peers
White Plains, NY 53.9% 7th +4.4pp 19th 74% above peers
Madison, AL 64.5% 3rd +5.1pp 20th 108% above peers
Shoreline, WA 52.8% 9th +3.9pp 21st 71% above peers
La Mesa, CA 40.6% 13th +2.8pp 22nd 31% above peers
Revere, MA 24.6% 22nd +1.7pp 23rd 21% below peers
Santa Cruz, CA 57.6% 4th +3.8pp 24th 86% above peers
Taunton, MA 23.9% 24th +1.4pp 25th 23% below peers
Stonecrest, GA 31.0% 16th +1.6pp 26th on par with peers
Parker, CO 56.0% 6th +2.8pp 27th 81% above peers
Blue Springs, MO 35.0% 15th +0.4pp 28th 13% above peers
Meriden, CT 22.2% 28th -0.1pp 29th 28% below peers
Chapel Hill, NC 76.6% 1st -0.3pp 30th 147% above peers
San Rafael, CA 49.7% 10th -2.5pp 31st 60% above peers
Where is this changing? 15 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationAdults with a bachelor's degree or higher
Loading tract map…
3 of 15 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 1 has too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Break down by group Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Leander, TX up 12.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 95% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Grapevine, TX up 9.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 87% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Lakewood, OH up 8.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 85% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±2.8pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Education

Children ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool

▲ Higher is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Preschool enrollment changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (75.9% then, 59.8% now; margin ±19.9pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 8 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: preschool enrollment fell 10.3 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (70.1% to 59.8%).
59.8%
20112024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Florida ref 48.9% -2.9pp
United States ref 45.5%
Pico Rivera, CA 49.9% 15th +15.1pp 1st 1% above peers
Vineland, NJ 77.5% 1st +20.4pp 2nd 57% above peers
Florence-Graham, CA 49.2% 16th +12.6pp 3rd on par with peers
Madison, AL 62.4% 6th +13.5pp 4th 27% above peers
Dearborn Heights, MI 54.0% 11th +11.2pp 5th 10% above peers
Montebello, CA 42.2% 23rd +6.1pp 6th 14% below peers
Shoreline, WA 67.6% 2nd +9.5pp 7th 37% above peers
Revere, MA 41.7% 24th +5.4pp 8th 15% below peers
Blue Springs, MO 43.8% 20th +1.0pp 9th 11% below peers
San Rafael, CA 65.8% 3rd -0.2pp 10th 34% above peers
Woodland, CA 51.1% 14th -0.2pp 11th 4% above peers
Springfield, OR 34.8% 29th -1.0pp 12th 29% below peers
Taunton, MA 44.7% 19th -1.5pp 13th 9% below peers
Parker, CO 55.8% 9th -3.1pp 14th 13% above peers
Casa Grande, AZ 26.7% 31st -2.2pp 15th 46% below peers
Wylie, TX 45.0% 18th -7.0pp 16th 9% below peers
Bristol, CT 62.5% 5th -11.2pp 17th 27% above peers
North Miami, FL 51.2% 13th -10.2pp 18th 4% above peers
White Plains, NY 62.8% 4th -12.8pp 19th 27% above peers
Stonecrest, GA 46.2% 17th -10.3pp 20th 6% below peers
Encinitas, CA 55.3% 10th -12.6pp 21st 12% above peers
Jupiter, FL 62.0% 7th -14.2pp 22nd 26% above peers
Meriden, CT 52.6% 12th -13.9pp 23rd 7% above peers
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 59.8% 8th -16.1pp 24th 21% above peers
Great Falls, MT 35.1% 28th -10.5pp 25th 29% below peers
Palm Harbor, FL 41.2% 25th -15.0pp 26th 16% below peers
La Mesa, CA 38.6% 27th -16.3pp 27th 22% below peers
Euless, TX 42.2% 22nd -20.8pp 28th 14% below peers
Owensboro, KY 33.1% 30th -16.4pp 29th 33% below peers
Chapel Hill, NC 42.7% 21st -25.1pp 30th 13% below peers
Santa Cruz, CA 38.6% 26th -25.1pp 31st 22% below peers
Where is this changing? 15 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationChildren ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool
Loading tract map…
5 of 15 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 1 has too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Vineland, NJ up 20.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 94% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Livermore, CA up 16.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 92% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Brookhaven, GA up 18.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 91% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±16.5pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Education

Teens not in school and not working

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Disconnected youth changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (2.4% then, 4.5% now; margin ±6.9pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 5 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: disconnected youth fell 1.0 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (5.5% to 4.5%).
4.5%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Florida ref 7.1% +0.0pp
United States ref 6.9% +0.3pp
Chapel Hill, NC 0.2% 1st -1.0pp 1st 97% below peers
Parker, CO 0.6% 2nd -3.1pp 2nd 90% below peers
Pico Rivera, CA 4.8% 11th -22.4pp 3rd 22% below peers
Madison, AL 1.0% 3rd -1.3pp 4th 84% below peers
La Mesa, CA 6.0% 15th -5.1pp 5th 2% below peers
Woodland, CA 6.0% 14th -4.2pp 6th 2% below peers
Taunton, MA 1.9% 6th -1.0pp 7th 70% below peers
Montebello, CA 5.7% 12th -2.2pp 8th 7% below peers
Bristol, CT 6.4% 18th -2.3pp 9th 4% above peers
Jupiter, FL 3.2% 7th -1.1pp 10th 48% below peers
Encinitas, CA 1.7% 5th -0.5pp 11th 73% below peers
Vineland, NJ 19.7% 30th -4.7pp 12th 220% above peers
Florence-Graham, CA 9.1% 25th -1.9pp 13th 47% above peers
Palm Harbor, FL 3.4% 8th -0.1pp 14th 45% below peers
Shoreline, WA 5.7% 13th -0.2pp 15th 7% below peers
Dearborn Heights, MI 6.4% 19th -0.0pp 16th 4% above peers
San Rafael, CA 7.8% 23rd +0.2pp 17th 26% above peers
Stonecrest, GA 7.3% 20th +0.2pp 18th 19% above peers
Great Falls, MT 8.4% 24th +0.8pp 19th 36% above peers
Owensboro, KY 6.2% 16th +0.8pp 20th on par with peers
Euless, TX 6.3% 17th +1.1pp 21st 2% above peers
Wylie, TX 4.3% 9th +0.8pp 22nd 30% below peers
North Miami, FL 12.9% 26th +3.5pp 23rd 110% above peers
Santa Cruz, CA 1.0% 4th +0.3pp 24th 84% below peers
Springfield, OR 14.7% 29th +6.4pp 25th 138% above peers
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 4.5% 10th +2.1pp 26th 26% below peers
Casa Grande, AZ 20.8% 31st +10.2pp 27th 237% above peers
Revere, MA 14.4% 28th +9.7pp 28th 133% above peers
Blue Springs, MO 7.4% 22nd +5.3pp 29th 20% above peers
Meriden, CT 13.2% 27th +10.1pp 30th 114% above peers
White Plains, NY 7.3% 21st +6.8pp 31st 19% above peers
Where is this changing? 15 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationTeens not in school and not working
Loading tract map…
3 of 15 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 1 has too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B14005) through 2024 ±5.3pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Education data →
Demographics
Demographics

Population

No better direction Rising
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Population rose about 8% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 56,219 to 60,959 - more than the combined survey margin (±100). 21 of the 30 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.

Rising beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 29 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: population rose about 22% from 2014 to 2024 (50,147 to 60,959).
60,959
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Madison, AL 60,106 29th +22% 1st 1% below peers
Wylie, TX 60,334 25th +21% 2nd 1% below peers
Parker, CO 61,783 3rd +14% 3rd 2% above peers
Revere, MA 60,012 30th +12% 4th 1% below peers
Stonecrest, GA 60,501 20th +12% 5th on par with peers
Dearborn Heights, MI 61,771 4th +11% 6th 2% above peers
Casa Grande, AZ 60,905 15th +9% 7th on par with peers
Blue Springs, MO 59,965 31st +9% 8th 1% below peers
Shoreline, WA 61,431 11th +9% 9th 1% above peers
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 60,959 14th +8% 10th on par with peers
Euless, TX 60,421 23rd +8% 11th 1% below peers
Taunton, MA 60,433 21st +6% 12th 1% below peers
White Plains, NY 60,666 18th +4% 13th on par with peers
Woodland, CA 61,854 2nd +4% 14th 2% above peers
San Rafael, CA 60,433 22nd +3% 15th 1% below peers
Great Falls, MT 60,329 26th +3% 16th 1% below peers
La Mesa, CA 60,797 16th +2% 17th on par with peers
Bristol, CT 61,462 10th +2% 18th 1% above peers
Vineland, NJ 61,006 13th +2% 19th on par with peers
Meriden, CT 60,545 19th +1% 20th on par with peers
Owensboro, KY 60,302 27th +1% 21st 1% below peers
Chapel Hill, NC 61,607 5th +1% 22nd 1% above peers
Springfield, OR 61,499 8th -1% 23rd 1% above peers
Palm Harbor, FL 61,512 7th -1% 24th 1% above peers
Encinitas, CA 61,480 9th -2% 25th 1% above peers
Montebello, CA 61,045 12th -3% 26th on par with peers
North Miami, FL 60,344 24th -3% 27th 1% below peers
Jupiter, FL 61,883 1st -4% 28th 2% above peers
Pico Rivera, CA 60,272 28th -4% 29th 1% below peers
Santa Cruz, CA 61,607 6th -5% 30th 1% above peers
Florence-Graham, CA 60,690 17th -8% 31st on par with peers
Where is this changing? 15 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsPopulation
Loading tract map…
3 of 15 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±78 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Children's share of the population

No better direction No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Children changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (15.5% then, 16.6% now; margin ±1.5pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 11 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: children rose 1.4 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (15.2% to 16.6%).
16.6%
20172024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Florida ref 18.8% -0.7pp
United States ref 21.6% -0.7pp
Meriden, CT 21.9% 14th +2.5pp 1st 1% above peers
Madison, AL 27.9% 2nd +2.7pp 2nd 29% above peers
La Mesa, CA 21.7% 15th +1.5pp 3rd 1% above peers
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 16.6% 29th +1.1pp 4th 23% below peers
Vineland, NJ 25.5% 6th +1.6pp 5th 18% above peers
Euless, TX 24.2% 8th +1.2pp 6th 12% above peers
North Miami, FL 23.3% 12th +1.0pp 7th 8% above peers
Dearborn Heights, MI 25.2% 7th +0.7pp 8th 16% above peers
Palm Harbor, FL 17.0% 28th +0.3pp 9th 21% below peers
Encinitas, CA 20.6% 20th +0.3pp 10th 4% below peers
Bristol, CT 20.1% 22nd -0.2pp 11th 7% below peers
Shoreline, WA 18.8% 25th -0.2pp 12th 13% below peers
White Plains, NY 18.6% 26th -0.3pp 13th 14% below peers
Woodland, CA 23.6% 11th -0.4pp 14th 9% above peers
Owensboro, KY 23.8% 10th -0.5pp 15th 10% above peers
Great Falls, MT 21.4% 17th -0.4pp 16th 1% below peers
Revere, MA 19.6% 24th -0.6pp 17th 9% below peers
Springfield, OR 21.0% 18th -0.9pp 18th 3% below peers
Jupiter, FL 18.4% 27th -0.8pp 19th 15% below peers
Taunton, MA 21.6% 16th -1.0pp 20th on par with peers
Blue Springs, MO 27.4% 4th -1.3pp 21st 27% above peers
Chapel Hill, NC 14.8% 30th -1.3pp 22nd 31% below peers
Pico Rivera, CA 20.8% 19th -1.9pp 23rd 4% below peers
Montebello, CA 20.4% 21st -2.0pp 24th 6% below peers
Wylie, TX 27.6% 3rd -2.8pp 25th 28% above peers
Stonecrest, GA 24.2% 9th -2.6pp 26th 12% above peers
San Rafael, CA 19.7% 23rd -2.3pp 27th 9% below peers
Casa Grande, AZ 22.5% 13th -3.1pp 28th 4% above peers
Florence-Graham, CA 28.0% 1st -3.8pp 29th 30% above peers
Santa Cruz, CA 11.2% 31st -1.6pp 30th 48% below peers
Parker, CO 25.7% 5th -4.4pp 31st 19% above peers
Where is this changing? 15 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren's share of the population
Loading tract map…
3 of 15 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 1 has too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.2pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Children in single-parent families

No better direction No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Single-parent changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (21.7% then, 18.7% now; margin ±7.0pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 6 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: single-parent fell 9.0 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (27.8% to 18.7%).
18.7%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Florida ref 32.9% -1.8pp
United States ref 29.9% -0.2pp
Meriden, CT 59.0% 1st +17.6pp 1st 93% above peers
Woodland, CA 31.6% 15th +6.8pp 2nd 4% above peers
Montebello, CA 45.9% 5th +7.6pp 3rd 51% above peers
Madison, AL 20.4% 23rd +3.1pp 4th 33% below peers
Revere, MA 35.5% 10th +4.6pp 5th 17% above peers
Springfield, OR 43.1% 6th +5.5pp 6th 42% above peers
Florence-Graham, CA 48.5% 3rd +5.9pp 7th 59% above peers
Bristol, CT 32.6% 14th +3.4pp 8th 7% above peers
Parker, CO 16.7% 28th +1.2pp 9th 45% below peers
Blue Springs, MO 30.5% 16th +2.3pp 10th on par with peers
Pico Rivera, CA 28.9% 17th +1.6pp 11th 5% below peers
White Plains, NY 28.1% 20th +1.4pp 12th 8% below peers
Euless, TX 34.6% 13th +0.3pp 13th 14% above peers
La Mesa, CA 28.6% 18th +0.1pp 14th 6% below peers
Taunton, MA 47.5% 4th -0.1pp 15th 56% above peers
Shoreline, WA 19.4% 25th -0.4pp 16th 36% below peers
Great Falls, MT 34.7% 12th -1.3pp 17th 14% above peers
Chapel Hill, NC 19.4% 24th -1.3pp 18th 36% below peers
Casa Grande, AZ 36.9% 9th -3.9pp 19th 21% above peers
Palm Harbor, FL 23.2% 21st -2.9pp 20th 24% below peers
North Miami, FL 41.1% 8th -5.1pp 21st 35% above peers
Owensboro, KY 41.8% 7th -5.8pp 22nd 37% above peers
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 18.7% 27th -3.0pp 23rd 39% below peers
Santa Cruz, CA 28.5% 19th -4.8pp 24th 7% below peers
Vineland, NJ 34.8% 11th -6.8pp 25th 14% above peers
Stonecrest, GA 54.2% 2nd -11.7pp 26th 78% above peers
San Rafael, CA 22.4% 22nd -7.5pp 27th 26% below peers
Dearborn Heights, MI 18.9% 26th -6.6pp 28th 38% below peers
Encinitas, CA 13.2% 30th -6.7pp 29th 57% below peers
Jupiter, FL 16.0% 29th -11.2pp 30th 48% below peers
Wylie, TX 12.6% 31st -12.9pp 31st 59% below peers
Where is this changing? 15 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren in single-parent families
Loading tract map…
3 of 15 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 1 has too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B09002) through 2024 ±4.9pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Young children with all parents in the labor force

No better direction No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Working parents changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (69.5% then, 64.6% now; margin ±13.1pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 2 of 30 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: working parents fell 3.8 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (68.4% to 64.6%).
64.6%
20102024
Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Florida ref 69.2% +1.8pp
United States ref 68.1% +1.9pp
San Rafael, CA 75.6% 6th +12.3pp 1st 7% above peers
Meriden, CT 81.3% 2nd +11.9pp 2nd 15% above peers
Dearborn Heights, MI 54.0% 30th +7.7pp 3rd 23% below peers
Montebello, CA 75.4% 7th +9.9pp 4th 7% above peers
Woodland, CA 67.1% 21st +6.2pp 5th 5% below peers
Parker, CO 72.2% 14th +6.6pp 6th 3% above peers
Encinitas, CA 78.4% 4th +6.4pp 7th 11% above peers
Chapel Hill, NC 75.9% 5th +6.1pp 8th 8% above peers
Blue Springs, MO 73.6% 12th +5.5pp 9th 4% above peers
White Plains, NY 80.6% 3rd +5.9pp 10th 14% above peers
Florence-Graham, CA 61.8% 26th +4.0pp 11th 12% below peers
Wylie, TX 60.8% 27th +3.8pp 12th 14% below peers
Vineland, NJ 74.1% 10th +4.0pp 13th 5% above peers
Springfield, OR 73.0% 13th +3.5pp 14th 4% above peers
Santa Cruz, CA 83.0% 1st +3.8pp 15th 18% above peers
Great Falls, MT 70.5% 16th +2.8pp 16th on par with peers
Madison, AL 59.3% 29th +1.0pp 17th 16% below peers
Euless, TX 74.9% 8th +0.3pp 18th 6% above peers
Shoreline, WA 67.6% 18th -1.5pp 19th 4% below peers
Casa Grande, AZ 64.2% 25th -2.3pp 20th 9% below peers
Owensboro, KY 65.0% 22nd -2.7pp 21st 8% below peers
Revere, MA 71.2% 15th -3.7pp 22nd 1% above peers
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 64.6% 24th -4.9pp 23rd 8% below peers
North Miami, FL 67.4% 19th -5.4pp 24th 4% below peers
Pico Rivera, CA 67.2% 20th -5.9pp 25th 5% below peers
Palm Harbor, FL 64.6% 23rd -5.9pp 26th 8% below peers
La Mesa, CA 59.5% 28th -5.7pp 27th 16% below peers
Bristol, CT 74.8% 9th -7.8pp 28th 6% above peers
Stonecrest, GA 73.6% 11th -8.6pp 29th 4% above peers
Taunton, MA 69.0% 17th -8.6pp 30th 2% below peers
Jupiter, FL 50.3% 31st -16.8pp 31st 29% below peers
Where is this changing? 15 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsYoung children with all parents in the labor force
Loading tract map…
4 of 15 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes); 1 has too little data to show a change (gray). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B23008) through 2024 ±9.5pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Demographics data →