DataWorks Commons
Eastvale, CA
← All cities

Eastvale, CA

See all data for this place → See Eastvale on Skyline →
70,594 people (2025) 50k-100k West

Bright spots 12 indicators

Where Eastvale, CA shows a real improvement in recent years, or stands clearly ahead of its peers. How this is calculated →
★
SNAP
Households receiving SNAP
3.6%
2019-23
▼ 47%
relative change
6.8% in 2018
Real improvement Leading peers
Learn more ↓
 ★
Household income
Median household income
$160,069
2020-24
▲ 34%
relative change
$119,213 in 2019
Real improvement Leading peers
Learn more ↓
College attainment
Adults with a bachelor's degree or higher
43.4%
2020-24
▲ 17%
relative change
37.1% in 2019
Real improvement Leading peers
Learn more ↓
 ★
Inequality
Income inequality (Gini index)
0.33
2020-24
▼ 11%
relative change
0.38 in 2019
Improving (small) Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Unemployment
Unemployment rate
4.1%
Jul 2026
▼ 7%
relative change
4.4% a year earlier
Dropping fast Leading peers
Learn more ↓
 ★
Uninsured
People without health insurance
3.9%
2020-24
▼ 7%
relative change
4.1% in 2019
Turning down (early signal) Leading peers
Learn more ↓
 ★
Broadband
Households with a broadband internet subscription
98.4%
2020-24
▲ <1%
relative change
97.9% in 2019
No measurable change Leading peers
Learn more ↓
 ★
Homeownership
Homeownership rate
78.0%
2020-24
▲ <1%
relative change
77.4% in 2019
No measurable change Leading peers
Learn more ↓
 ★
Poverty
Share of people below the poverty level
4.8%
2020-24
▼ 19%
relative change
5.9% in 2019
No measurable change Leading peers
Learn more ↓
 ★
Child poverty
Share of children below the poverty level
4.4%
2020-24
▼ 22%
relative change
5.6% in 2019
No measurable change Leading peers
Learn more ↓
 ★
Child uninsured
Children without health insurance
1.3%
2020-24
▲ 31%
relative change
1.0% in 2019
No measurable change Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Preschool enrollment
Children ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool
53.4%
2020-24
▲ 22%
relative change
43.7% in 2019
No measurable change Leading peers
Learn more ↓

What needs attention 1 indicator

Where Eastvale, CA shows a real worsening in recent years, or trails its peers clearly. How this is calculated →
No vehicle
Households without a vehicle
2.1%
2020-24
▲ 104%
relative change
1.0% in 2019
Turning up (early signal) Leading peers
Learn more ↓

Big moves & big gaps 7 indicators

Real movement and big differences from peers, where neither direction is simply good or bad. Biggest relative change first; big-gap cards come last. How this is calculated →
Population
70,633
2020-24
▲ 14%
relative change
62,046 in 2019
Rising Among the lowest of peers
Learn more ↓
Children
Children's share of the population
28.0%
2020-24
▼ 8%
relative change
30.4% in 2019
Falling Among the highest of peers
Learn more ↓
Rent
Typical asking rent
$3,730
Aug 2026
▲ <1%
relative change
$3,695 a year earlier
Rising recently Among the highest of peers
Learn more ↓
Home value
Typical home value
$930,341
Aug 2026
▲ <1%
relative change
$923,320 a year earlier
Rising recently Among the highest of peers
Learn more ↓
Starter homes
Starter home value (bottom tier)
$801,504
Aug 2026
high
vs peers
$799,223 a year earlier
Rising Among the highest of peers
Learn more ↓
Single-parent
Children in single-parent families
11.2%
2020-24
low
vs peers
16.5% in 2019
No measurable change Among the lowest of peers
Learn more ↓
Working parents
Young children with all parents in the labor force
78.6%
2020-24
high
vs peers
73.1% in 2019
No measurable change Among the highest of peers
Learn more ↓

All indicators

Economy 7 indicators
★
Economy

Median household income

▲ Higher is better Real improvement ★ National leader
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Household income rose about 34% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from $119,213 to $160,069 (each survey's own dollars, not adjusted for inflation) - more than the combined survey margin (±$11,575).

Broader trend
97% of similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. Eastvale started among the stronger third of similar-size cities and kept improving; worth investigating.
Longer view
Household income rose about 46% from 2014 to 2024 ($109,783 to $160,069).
Bright spot $160,069
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref $99,122 +32%
United States ref $80,734 +28%
Lodi, CA $88,530 12th +51% 1st 8% above peers
Camden, NJ $40,546 31st +50% 2nd 51% below peers
Dublin, CA $214,385 1st +43% 3rd 161% above peers
Idaho Falls, ID $73,110 19th +38% 4th 11% below peers
North Richland Hills, TX $97,305 10th +37% 5th 19% above peers
Passaic, NJ $55,371 28th +35% 6th 33% below peers
Delray Beach, FL $82,041 16th +35% 7th on par with peers
Ocala, FL $56,376 26th +35% 8th 31% below peers
Eastvale, CA $160,069 3rd +34% 9th 95% above peers
Grand Junction, CO $70,080 20th +33% 10th 15% below peers
Guaynabo zona urbana, PR $57,272 24th +33% 11th 30% below peers
Yuba City, CA $75,477 18th +33% 12th 8% below peers
Casa Grande, AZ $69,983 21st +32% 13th 15% below peers
Greenwood, IN $83,608 15th +32% 14th 2% above peers
Portland, ME $79,540 17th +32% 15th 3% below peers
Casas Adobes, AZ $83,683 14th +30% 16th 2% above peers
Weston, FL $139,825 4th +30% 17th 70% above peers
Schenectady, NY $58,399 22nd +29% 18th 29% below peers
Waukesha, WI $83,837 13th +28% 19th 2% above peers
Shawnee, KS $109,940 9th +26% 20th 34% above peers
Gaithersburg, MD $112,467 7th +25% 21st 37% above peers
Walnut Creek, CA $130,432 6th +23% 22nd 59% above peers
Jackson, TN $53,032 30th +22% 23rd 35% below peers
St. Joseph, MO $57,956 23rd +20% 24th 29% below peers
Dothan, AL $55,792 27th +19% 25th 32% below peers
Centreville, VA $139,510 5th +18% 26th 70% above peers
Dale City, VA $111,994 8th +18% 27th 37% above peers
Bethesda, MD $192,237 2nd +17% 28th 134% above peers
Lafayette, IN $53,716 29th +16% 29th 35% below peers
Kyle, TX $90,323 11th +14% 30th 10% above peers
Lakewood, NJ $56,968 25th +12% 31st 31% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 8 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyMedian household income
Loading tract map…
5 of 8 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Palo Alto, CA up about 46% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 96% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Dublin, CA up about 43% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 92% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Bothell, WA up about 40% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 88% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±$7,106 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Unemployment rate

▼ Lower is better Improving recently, leading peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Unemployment fell 0.3 percentage points over the 12 months ending July 2026, faster than 71% of similar-size cities.

Broader trend
Multi-year view: unemployment rose about 0.4 percentage points a year from 2022 to 2025. That is movement in the wrong direction.
Longer view
Unemployment fell less than 0.1 percentage points a year from 2015 to 2025.
Latest
Most recent monthly reading: 4.1% in July 2026, down from 4.4% a year earlier.
Bright spot 4.1%
2010July 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 25 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 5.1% (Jul 26) -0.4pp
United States ref 4.1% (Aug 26) -0.2pp
Camden, NJ 8.8% (Jul 26) 25th -2.7pp 1st 100% above peers
Passaic, NJ 5.7% (Jul 26) 21st -1.6pp 2nd 30% above peers
Lafayette, IN 3.4% (Jul 26) 5th -1.3pp 3rd 23% below peers
Yuba City, CA 7.6% (Jul 26) 24th -0.8pp 4th 73% above peers
Lodi, CA 5.7% (Jul 26) 22nd -0.8pp 5th 30% above peers
St. Joseph, MO 4.4% (Jul 26) 13th -0.5pp 6th on par with peers
Jackson, TN 4.4% (Jul 26) 14th -0.4pp 7th on par with peers
Eastvale, CA 4.1% (Jul 26) 10th -0.3pp 8th 7% below peers
Dublin, CA 4.5% (Jul 26) 16th -0.3pp 9th 2% above peers
Greenwood, IN 3.2% (Jul 26) 3rd -0.3pp 10th 27% below peers
Gaithersburg, MD 3.8% (Jul 26) 9th -0.2pp 11th 14% below peers
Walnut Creek, CA 4.8% (Jul 26) 18th +0.0pp 12th 9% above peers
Portland, ME 2.7% (Jul 26) 1st +0.0pp 13th 39% below peers
Shawnee, KS 3.7% (Jul 26) 7th +0.0pp 14th 16% below peers
Grand Junction, CO 4.2% (Jul 26) 11th +0.0pp 15th 5% below peers
Waukesha, WI 3.2% (Jul 26) 4th +0.2pp 16th 27% below peers
Idaho Falls, ID 3.1% (Jul 26) 2nd +0.2pp 17th 30% below peers
Schenectady, NY 5.3% (Jul 26) 19th +0.3pp 18th 20% above peers
North Richland Hills, TX 4.3% (Jul 26) 12th +0.4pp 19th 2% below peers
Kyle, TX 3.5% (Jul 26) 6th +0.4pp 20th 20% below peers
Delray Beach, FL 4.4% (Jul 26) 15th +0.6pp 21st on par with peers
Ocala, FL 5.4% (Jul 26) 20th +0.6pp 22nd 23% above peers
Weston, FL 4.7% (Jul 26) 17th +0.7pp 23rd 7% above peers
Casa Grande, AZ 6.2% (Jul 26) 23rd +0.8pp 24th 41% above peers
Dothan, AL 3.7% (Jul 26) 8th +0.9pp 25th 16% below peers
BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics through 2025 administrative trend: robust fit about this metric
★
Economy

Share of people below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better No measurable change ★ National leader
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Poverty changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (5.9% then, 4.8% now; margin ±2.0pp).

Broader trend
33% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Poverty fell 0.4 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (5.1% to 4.8%).
Bright spot 4.8%
20112024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 12.0% -1.3pp
United States ref 12.4%
Shawnee, KS 5.3% 4th -2.1pp 1st 54% below peers
Grand Junction, CO 11.8% 17th -3.8pp 2nd 3% above peers
Casas Adobes, AZ 6.6% 7th -2.1pp 3rd 43% below peers
Portland, ME 11.2% 15th -3.4pp 4th 3% below peers
Dale City, VA 7.0% 8th -1.9pp 5th 39% below peers
Passaic, NJ 22.9% 28th -5.8pp 6th 99% above peers
Eastvale, CA 4.8% 3rd -1.2pp 7th 59% below peers
Lodi, CA 12.4% 18th -3.0pp 8th 8% above peers
Camden, NJ 30.2% 31st -6.2pp 9th 162% above peers
Idaho Falls, ID 11.5% 16th -1.9pp 10th on par with peers
Casa Grande, AZ 13.5% 20th -2.0pp 11th 17% above peers
Yuba City, CA 14.3% 21st -1.2pp 12th 24% above peers
Gaithersburg, MD 8.8% 12th -0.7pp 13th 24% below peers
Waukesha, WI 9.8% 14th -0.8pp 14th 15% below peers
North Richland Hills, TX 7.2% 9th -0.4pp 15th 38% below peers
St. Joseph, MO 17.7% 22nd -1.0pp 16th 54% above peers
Weston, FL 6.1% 5th -0.2pp 17th 47% below peers
Jackson, TN 22.2% 27th -0.3pp 18th 93% above peers
Lakewood, NJ 29.9% 30th +0.4pp 19th 160% above peers
Guaynabo zona urbana, PR 21.3% 26th +0.3pp 20th 85% above peers
Dothan, AL 19.3% 24th +0.5pp 21st 68% above peers
Greenwood, IN 7.4% 11th +0.2pp 22nd 36% below peers
Ocala, FL 21.1% 25th +0.8pp 23rd 83% above peers
Lafayette, IN 17.8% 23rd +1.1pp 24th 55% above peers
Delray Beach, FL 13.0% 19th +1.3pp 25th 13% above peers
Dublin, CA 4.5% 2nd +0.5pp 26th 61% below peers
Walnut Creek, CA 6.4% 6th +1.0pp 27th 45% below peers
Schenectady, NY 23.8% 29th +4.5pp 28th 107% above peers
Bethesda, MD 4.3% 1st +0.8pp 29th 63% below peers
Centreville, VA 7.2% 10th +2.1pp 30th 37% below peers
Kyle, TX 8.9% 13th +3.8pp 31st 23% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 8 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of people below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
5 of 8 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Apex, NC down 2.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Eagle Mountain, UT down 3.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Westfield, IN down 2.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.4pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
★
Economy

Share of children below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better No measurable change ★ National leader
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Child poverty changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (5.6% then, 4.4% now; margin ±2.1pp).

Broader trend
30% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Child poverty fell 1.6 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (5.9% to 4.4%).
Bright spot 4.4%
20132024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 15.0% -3.1pp
United States ref 16.1%
Casas Adobes, AZ 6.0% 5th -4.8pp 1st 60% below peers
Grand Junction, CO 10.8% 12th -7.9pp 2nd 27% below peers
Shawnee, KS 5.2% 4th -3.8pp 3rd 65% below peers
Dale City, VA 8.6% 8th -5.4pp 4th 42% below peers
Casa Grande, AZ 16.8% 18th -5.8pp 5th 13% above peers
Greenwood, IN 6.3% 6th -2.1pp 6th 57% below peers
Eastvale, CA 4.4% 3rd -1.2pp 7th 71% below peers
Passaic, NJ 32.1% 27th -7.4pp 8th 116% above peers
St. Joseph, MO 22.7% 22nd -5.1pp 9th 53% above peers
Camden, NJ 38.9% 31st -8.5pp 10th 162% above peers
Yuba City, CA 17.7% 19th -3.3pp 11th 19% above peers
Gaithersburg, MD 11.5% 13th -1.9pp 12th 22% below peers
Waukesha, WI 12.9% 15th -2.0pp 13th 13% below peers
Lodi, CA 20.3% 21st -3.1pp 14th 37% above peers
Portland, ME 14.8% 16th -2.1pp 15th on par with peers
Idaho Falls, ID 15.1% 17th -1.7pp 16th 2% above peers
Jackson, TN 32.1% 28th -2.8pp 17th 117% above peers
North Richland Hills, TX 11.7% 14th -0.6pp 18th 21% below peers
Guaynabo zona urbana, PR 31.3% 26th -0.4pp 19th 111% above peers
Lakewood, NJ 33.1% 29th +0.2pp 20th 123% above peers
Ocala, FL 31.2% 25th +1.4pp 21st 111% above peers
Lafayette, IN 25.8% 23rd +1.4pp 22nd 74% above peers
Dothan, AL 31.1% 24th +1.8pp 23rd 110% above peers
Dublin, CA 4.3% 2nd +0.3pp 24th 71% below peers
Schenectady, NY 35.7% 30th +5.1pp 25th 141% above peers
Delray Beach, FL 19.9% 20th +3.0pp 26th 34% above peers
Weston, FL 8.1% 7th +1.5pp 27th 46% below peers
Centreville, VA 9.4% 11th +2.5pp 28th 37% below peers
Walnut Creek, CA 9.0% 10th +2.7pp 29th 39% below peers
Kyle, TX 8.7% 9th +3.0pp 30th 41% below peers
Bethesda, MD 3.2% 1st +1.8pp 31st 79% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 8 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of children below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
5 of 8 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Westfield, IN down 6.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Catalina Foothills, AZ down 5.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Apex, NC down 4.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.4pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
★
Economy

Households with a broadband internet subscription

▲ Higher is better No measurable change ★ National leader
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Broadband changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (97.9% then, 98.4% now; margin ±1.1pp).

Broader trend
93% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Broadband rose 1.7 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (96.7% to 98.4%).
Bright spot 98.4%
20172024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 93.6% +6.6pp
United States ref 91.1%
Camden, NJ 86.5% 28th +22.3pp 1st 7% below peers
Passaic, NJ 93.8% 15th +20.1pp 2nd 1% above peers
Ocala, FL 91.3% 22nd +14.0pp 3rd 2% below peers
Jackson, TN 89.3% 25th +13.2pp 4th 4% below peers
Lafayette, IN 91.4% 21st +11.0pp 5th 2% below peers
St. Joseph, MO 85.9% 30th +10.1pp 6th 7% below peers
Lakewood, NJ 59.1% 31st +6.7pp 7th 36% below peers
Guaynabo zona urbana, PR 88.8% 26th +9.4pp 8th 4% below peers
Dothan, AL 87.5% 27th +8.6pp 9th 6% below peers
Kyle, TX 98.2% 4th +9.3pp 10th 6% above peers
Greenwood, IN 94.2% 14th +8.7pp 11th 1% above peers
Yuba City, CA 91.1% 23rd +8.2pp 12th 2% below peers
Casa Grande, AZ 92.9% 16th +7.4pp 13th on par with peers
Waukesha, WI 94.4% 13th +7.4pp 14th 2% above peers
Grand Junction, CO 92.4% 18th +6.9pp 15th 1% below peers
Gaithersburg, MD 96.5% 9th +7.2pp 16th 4% above peers
Schenectady, NY 86.4% 29th +6.2pp 17th 7% below peers
Lodi, CA 92.0% 19th +6.2pp 18th 1% below peers
North Richland Hills, TX 96.5% 8th +5.9pp 19th 4% above peers
Portland, ME 91.7% 20th +5.5pp 20th 1% below peers
Idaho Falls, ID 92.6% 17th +5.2pp 21st on par with peers
Delray Beach, FL 89.9% 24th +5.0pp 22nd 3% below peers
Walnut Creek, CA 96.4% 10th +5.0pp 23rd 4% above peers
Shawnee, KS 95.8% 11th +4.9pp 24th 3% above peers
Casas Adobes, AZ 94.8% 12th +4.8pp 25th 2% above peers
Dale City, VA 97.2% 6th +2.9pp 26th 5% above peers
Bethesda, MD 97.1% 7th +2.7pp 27th 5% above peers
Dublin, CA 98.3% 3rd +2.5pp 28th 6% above peers
Centreville, VA 98.3% 2nd +2.3pp 29th 6% above peers
Weston, FL 97.7% 5th +1.8pp 30th 5% above peers
Eastvale, CA 98.4% 1st +0.5pp 31st 6% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 8 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds with a broadband internet subscription
Loading tract map…
5 of 8 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • St. Louis Park, MN up 6.5pp between its surveys · a smaller real gain than 51% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Wheaton, MD up 6.5pp between its surveys · a smaller real gain than 52% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Chino, CA up 6.0pp between its surveys · a smaller real gain than 55% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.7pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
★
Economy

Income inequality (Gini index)

▼ Lower is better Improving (small) ★ National leader
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Inequality fell about 11% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 0.38 to 0.33 - more than the combined survey margin (±0.03). That reverses the previous span, which went up between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys.

Broader trend
7% of similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction; 10% moved the other way.
Longer view
Inequality rose about 3% from 2014 to 2024 (0.32 to 0.33).
Bright spot 0.33
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 0.49 +0.000
United States ref 0.48 +0.001
Eastvale, CA 0.33 1st -0.040 1st 25% below peers
Ocala, FL 0.48 22nd -0.055 2nd 7% above peers
Greenwood, IN 0.38 3rd -0.028 3rd 15% below peers
Lodi, CA 0.42 12th -0.029 4th 5% below peers
Idaho Falls, ID 0.44 14th -0.028 5th 2% below peers
Shawnee, KS 0.41 8th -0.025 6th 9% below peers
North Richland Hills, TX 0.40 7th -0.022 7th 10% below peers
Weston, FL 0.45 17th -0.023 8th on par with peers
Passaic, NJ 0.48 21st -0.022 9th 6% above peers
Grand Junction, CO 0.44 15th -0.019 10th 1% below peers
Jackson, TN 0.49 25th -0.020 11th 8% above peers
Lafayette, IN 0.41 9th -0.015 12th 8% below peers
Camden, NJ 0.48 24th -0.015 13th 8% above peers
Dothan, AL 0.49 26th -0.010 14th 10% above peers
Gaithersburg, MD 0.44 13th -0.005 15th 2% below peers
Guaynabo zona urbana, PR 0.55 31st -0.005 16th 24% above peers
Waukesha, WI 0.42 10th -0.002 17th 7% below peers
Lakewood, NJ 0.50 28th -0.001 18th 11% above peers
Portland, ME 0.46 18th +0.001 19th 3% above peers
Yuba City, CA 0.45 16th +0.005 20th on par with peers
Casas Adobes, AZ 0.42 11th +0.006 21st 7% below peers
Dale City, VA 0.38 4th +0.006 22nd 15% below peers
Walnut Creek, CA 0.47 19th +0.011 23rd 4% above peers
Dublin, CA 0.39 6th +0.010 24th 12% below peers
Delray Beach, FL 0.54 30th +0.015 25th 19% above peers
Bethesda, MD 0.51 29th +0.025 26th 14% above peers
Centreville, VA 0.39 5th +0.023 27th 12% below peers
St. Joseph, MO 0.48 23rd +0.028 28th 7% above peers
Kyle, TX 0.37 2nd +0.024 29th 18% below peers
Casa Grande, AZ 0.48 20th +0.045 30th 6% above peers
Schenectady, NY 0.50 27th +0.057 31st 11% above peers
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B19083) through 2024 ±0.02 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
★
Economy

Households receiving SNAP

▼ Lower is better Real improvement ★ Strong performer
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

SNAP fell 3.2 percentage points between the 2014-2018 and 2019-2023 surveys, from 6.8% to 3.6% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.4pp). That reverses the previous span, which went up between the 2009-2013 and 2014-2018 surveys.

Broader trend
33% of similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction; 10% moved the other way. Eastvale started among the stronger third of similar-size cities and kept improving; worth investigating.
Longer view
Snap fell 0.6 percentage points from 2013 to 2023 (4.3% to 3.6%).
Bright spot 3.6%
20102023
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2019-2023 survey Today's rank Change2014-2018 → 2019-2023 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 11.4% +2.2pp
United States ref 11.8% -0.5pp
Shawnee, KS 2.3% 1st -2.1pp 1st 79% below peers
Eastvale, CA 3.6% 6th -3.2pp 2nd 67% below peers
Lakewood, NJ 19.7% 26th -11.4pp 3rd 81% above peers
Casas Adobes, AZ 5.5% 9th -3.1pp 4th 50% below peers
North Richland Hills, TX 4.6% 8th -2.5pp 5th 58% below peers
Centreville, VA 3.3% 4th -1.6pp 6th 70% below peers
Portland, ME 10.9% 16th -4.1pp 7th on par with peers
Idaho Falls, ID 11.0% 18th -3.9pp 8th 2% above peers
Lafayette, IN 11.0% 17th -3.6pp 9th 1% above peers
Casa Grande, AZ 13.1% 22nd -3.1pp 10th 21% above peers
Waukesha, WI 9.2% 13th -1.7pp 11th 15% below peers
Grand Junction, CO 10.5% 14th -1.2pp 12th 4% below peers
Ocala, FL 18.1% 25th -1.8pp 13th 67% above peers
Passaic, NJ 38.2% 30th -1.2pp 14th 251% above peers
Jackson, TN 20.4% 28th -0.6pp 15th 88% above peers
Yuba City, CA 12.4% 21st -0.2pp 16th 14% above peers
St. Joseph, MO 15.6% 23rd +0.3pp 17th 43% above peers
Greenwood, IN 7.3% 11th +0.2pp 18th 33% below peers
Dothan, AL 16.8% 24th +0.8pp 19th 55% above peers
Lodi, CA 11.3% 19th +0.6pp 20th 4% above peers
Kyle, TX 6.8% 10th +0.5pp 21st 38% below peers
Camden, NJ 43.4% 31st +3.4pp 22nd 300% above peers
Weston, FL 3.9% 7th +0.4pp 23rd 64% below peers
Schenectady, NY 24.9% 29th +2.6pp 24th 129% above peers
Guaynabo zona urbana, PR 19.8% 27th +2.2pp 25th 82% above peers
Delray Beach, FL 10.5% 15th +1.5pp 26th 3% below peers
Dale City, VA 8.3% 12th +1.3pp 27th 24% below peers
Walnut Creek, CA 2.8% 2nd +0.5pp 28th 75% below peers
Gaithersburg, MD 11.3% 20th +2.1pp 29th 4% above peers
Bethesda, MD 3.1% 3rd +1.4pp 30th 71% below peers
Dublin, CA 3.4% 5th +1.9pp 31st 69% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 8 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2018 to 2023, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds receiving SNAP
Loading tract map…
5 of 8 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Queen Creek, AZ down 2.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2018-2023
  • El Dorado Hills, CA down 1.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2018-2023
  • South Jordan, UT down 1.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2018-2023
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2023 ±1.6pp at 90% confidence (2023 estimate) survey trend: 2014-2018 vs 2019-2023 surveys about this metric
See all Economy data →
Housing 6 indicators
Housing

Typical home value

No better direction Rising recently
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Home value rose about 1% over the 12 months ending August 2026, faster than 58% of similar-size cities.

Broader trend
Multi-year view: home value rose about 3% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 54% of similar-size cities.
Longer view
Home value rose about 10% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Latest
Most recent monthly reading: $930,341 in August 2026, up from $923,320 a year earlier.
Big move $930,341
2000August 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 27 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref $764,158 (Aug 26) +0.4%
United States ref $368,697 (Aug 26) +1.2%
Lakewood, NJ $589,571 (Aug 26) 7th +8.0% 1st 39% above peers
Waukesha, WI $423,254 (Aug 26) 14th +6.5% 2nd on par with peers
Schenectady, NY $333,482 (Aug 26) 19th +5.3% 3rd 21% below peers
Shawnee, KS $426,972 (Aug 26) 13th +4.7% 4th 1% above peers
Lafayette, IN $269,022 (Aug 26) 23rd +2.8% 5th 36% below peers
Passaic, NJ $555,875 (Aug 26) 9th +2.1% 6th 31% above peers
Dothan, AL $206,754 (Aug 26) 26th +1.8% 7th 51% below peers
Grand Junction, CO $422,821 (Aug 26) 15th +1.8% 8th on par with peers
Idaho Falls, ID $395,714 (Aug 26) 16th +1.4% 9th 7% below peers
Greenwood, IN $327,893 (Aug 26) 20th +1.2% 10th 23% below peers
Walnut Creek, CA $992,645 (Aug 26) 3rd +1.1% 11th 135% above peers
Eastvale, CA $930,341 (Aug 26) 4th +0.8% 12th 120% above peers
Bethesda, MD $1,121,468 (Aug 26) 2nd +0.7% 13th 165% above peers
Centreville, VA $618,763 (Aug 26) 6th +0.6% 14th 46% above peers
North Richland Hills, TX $367,768 (Aug 26) 17th +0.5% 15th 13% below peers
Yuba City, CA $439,108 (Aug 26) 12th +0.2% 16th 4% above peers
Delray Beach, FL $343,049 (Aug 26) 18th +0.2% 17th 19% below peers
Portland, ME $559,175 (Aug 26) 8th +0.0% 18th 32% above peers
Casa Grande, AZ $316,044 (Aug 26) 21st -1.3% 19th 25% below peers
Gaithersburg, MD $517,488 (Aug 26) 10th -1.5% 20th 22% above peers
Jackson, TN $224,512 (Aug 26) 25th -1.5% 21st 47% below peers
Lodi, CA $511,715 (Aug 26) 11th -1.7% 22nd 21% above peers
Weston, FL $719,191 (Aug 26) 5th -1.7% 23rd 70% above peers
Ocala, FL $265,333 (Aug 26) 24th -2.5% 24th 37% below peers
Camden, NJ $152,107 (Aug 26) 27th -4.5% 25th 64% below peers
Dublin, CA $1,230,548 (Aug 26) 1st -6.0% 26th 191% above peers
Kyle, TX $294,393 (Aug 26) 22nd -6.5% 27th 30% below peers
Zillow Home Value Index through 2026-08 modeled trend: robust fit about this metric
Housing

Starter home value (bottom tier)

No better direction Rising
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Starter homes was essentially flat over the 12 months ending August 2026.

Broader trend
Multi-year view: starter homes rose about 3% a year from 2021 to 2026, faster than 50% of similar-size cities.
Longer view
Starter homes rose about 11% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Latest
Most recent monthly reading: $801,504 in August 2026, up from $799,223 a year earlier.
Big move $801,504
2001August 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 27 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref $467,879 (Aug 26) -0.0%
United States ref $200,550 (Aug 26) +2.2%
Shawnee, KS $330,982 (Aug 26) 12th +6.0% 1st 6% above peers
Waukesha, WI $311,451 (Aug 26) 14th +5.8% 2nd on par with peers
Schenectady, NY $246,797 (Aug 26) 20th +5.5% 3rd 21% below peers
Passaic, NJ $369,182 (Aug 26) 9th +4.4% 4th 19% above peers
Lafayette, IN $196,694 (Aug 26) 22nd +3.6% 5th 37% below peers
Dothan, AL $109,182 (Aug 26) 26th +2.9% 6th 65% below peers
Grand Junction, CO $324,346 (Aug 26) 13th +2.7% 7th 4% above peers
Greenwood, IN $247,415 (Aug 26) 19th +1.9% 8th 21% below peers
Idaho Falls, ID $297,672 (Aug 26) 15th +1.5% 9th 4% below peers
Portland, ME $430,673 (Aug 26) 6th +1.2% 10th 38% above peers
North Richland Hills, TX $286,884 (Aug 26) 16th +1.1% 11th 8% below peers
Camden, NJ $107,929 (Aug 26) 27th +1.0% 12th 65% below peers
Yuba City, CA $347,912 (Aug 26) 10th +0.9% 13th 12% above peers
Lakewood, NJ $231,297 (Aug 26) 21st +0.7% 14th 26% below peers
Centreville, VA $481,479 (Aug 26) 5th +0.6% 15th 55% above peers
Eastvale, CA $801,504 (Aug 26) 2nd +0.3% 16th 157% above peers
Jackson, TN $113,202 (Aug 26) 25th -1.5% 17th 64% below peers
Lodi, CA $397,723 (Aug 26) 8th -1.5% 18th 28% above peers
Casa Grande, AZ $249,476 (Aug 26) 18th -1.8% 19th 20% below peers
Walnut Creek, CA $493,471 (Aug 26) 3rd -2.0% 20th 58% above peers
Bethesda, MD $491,056 (Aug 26) 4th -2.1% 21st 58% above peers
Gaithersburg, MD $346,190 (Aug 26) 11th -2.5% 22nd 11% above peers
Ocala, FL $194,289 (Aug 26) 23rd -3.0% 23rd 38% below peers
Weston, FL $428,813 (Aug 26) 7th -3.6% 24th 38% above peers
Kyle, TX $251,372 (Aug 26) 17th -6.2% 25th 19% below peers
Delray Beach, FL $142,448 (Aug 26) 24th -6.5% 26th 54% below peers
Dublin, CA $834,299 (Aug 26) 1st -6.6% 27th 168% above peers
Zillow Home Value Index through 2026-08 modeled trend: robust fit about this metric
★
Housing

Homeownership rate

▲ Higher is better No measurable change ★ National leader
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Homeownership changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (77.4% then, 78.0% now; margin ±4.3pp).

Broader trend
40% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Homeownership fell 0.5 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (78.5% to 78.0%).
Bright spot 78.0%
20112024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 55.9% +1.0pp
United States ref 65.2%
Ocala, FL 52.1% 23rd +6.0pp 1st 18% below peers
Casa Grande, AZ 72.8% 6th +7.2pp 2nd 15% above peers
Grand Junction, CO 63.5% 14th +5.4pp 3rd 1% above peers
Lakewood, NJ 39.1% 29th +3.1pp 4th 38% below peers
Lodi, CA 56.8% 22nd +4.4pp 5th 10% below peers
Yuba City, CA 57.3% 20th +3.7pp 6th 9% below peers
St. Joseph, MO 62.8% 17th +4.0pp 7th 1% below peers
Passaic, NJ 23.8% 31st +1.5pp 8th 62% below peers
Casas Adobes, AZ 67.5% 8th +3.5pp 9th 7% above peers
Centreville, VA 73.2% 4th +3.2pp 10th 16% above peers
Portland, ME 46.9% 26th +1.7pp 11th 26% below peers
Dale City, VA 79.3% 1st +2.4pp 12th 25% above peers
Delray Beach, FL 63.2% 16th +1.3pp 13th on par with peers
North Richland Hills, TX 63.5% 15th +1.3pp 14th on par with peers
Greenwood, IN 59.3% 18th +1.1pp 15th 6% below peers
Idaho Falls, ID 64.2% 12th +1.1pp 16th 2% above peers
Waukesha, WI 58.8% 19th +0.7pp 17th 7% below peers
Shawnee, KS 73.7% 3rd +0.7pp 18th 17% above peers
Eastvale, CA 78.0% 2nd +0.7pp 19th 23% above peers
Dublin, CA 65.7% 10th +0.2pp 20th 4% above peers
Walnut Creek, CA 64.4% 11th -0.2pp 21st 2% above peers
Guaynabo zona urbana, PR 72.2% 7th -0.3pp 22nd 14% above peers
Kyle, TX 67.0% 9th -0.5pp 23rd 6% above peers
Gaithersburg, MD 50.8% 25th -0.4pp 24th 20% below peers
Weston, FL 73.0% 5th -0.8pp 25th 15% above peers
Jackson, TN 51.2% 24th -1.2pp 26th 19% below peers
Bethesda, MD 64.0% 13th -2.2pp 27th 1% above peers
Schenectady, NY 45.6% 28th -1.6pp 28th 28% below peers
Dothan, AL 57.1% 21st -2.1pp 29th 10% below peers
Lafayette, IN 46.7% 27th -1.9pp 30th 26% below peers
Camden, NJ 34.4% 30th -4.9pp 31st 46% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 8 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHomeownership rate
Loading tract map…
5 of 8 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±3.2pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Housing

Typical asking rent

No better direction Rising recently
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Rent rose about 1% over the 12 months ending August 2026, slower than 64% of similar-size cities.

Broader trend
Multi-year view: rent rose about 3% a year from 2021 to 2026, slower than 58% of similar-size cities.
Longer view
Rent rose about 7% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Latest
Most recent monthly reading: $3,730 in August 2026, up from $3,695 a year earlier.
Big move $3,730
2015August 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 27 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
United States ref $1,948 (Aug 26) +2.5%
Waukesha, WI $1,481 (Aug 26) 22nd +5.3% 1st 19% below peers
Walnut Creek, CA $2,959 (Aug 26) 5th +5.1% 2nd 62% above peers
Dublin, CA $3,299 (Aug 26) 3rd +3.9% 3rd 81% above peers
Delray Beach, FL $2,841 (Aug 26) 6th +3.8% 4th 56% above peers
Lodi, CA $2,188 (Aug 26) 10th +3.3% 5th 20% above peers
Portland, ME $2,419 (Aug 26) 7th +3.1% 6th 33% above peers
Lafayette, IN $1,296 (Aug 26) 26th +2.8% 7th 29% below peers
Schenectady, NY $1,503 (Aug 26) 21st +2.7% 8th 18% below peers
Greenwood, IN $1,584 (Aug 26) 17th +2.7% 9th 13% below peers
Idaho Falls, ID $1,388 (Aug 26) 25th +2.2% 10th 24% below peers
Jackson, TN $1,421 (Aug 26) 23rd +2.1% 11th 22% below peers
Grand Junction, CO $1,759 (Aug 26) 15th +1.9% 12th 3% below peers
Dothan, AL $1,236 (Aug 26) 27th +1.6% 13th 32% below peers
North Richland Hills, TX $1,541 (Aug 26) 20th +1.5% 14th 15% below peers
Weston, FL $3,421 (Aug 26) 2nd +1.3% 15th 88% above peers
Bethesda, MD $3,038 (Aug 26) 4th +1.3% 16th 67% above peers
Eastvale, CA $3,730 (Aug 26) 1st +0.9% 17th 105% above peers
Gaithersburg, MD $2,167 (Aug 26) 11th +0.9% 18th 19% above peers
Casa Grande, AZ $1,712 (Aug 26) 16th +0.9% 19th 6% below peers
Yuba City, CA $2,136 (Aug 26) 12th +0.7% 20th 17% above peers
Camden, NJ $1,823 (Aug 26) 14th +0.4% 21st on par with peers
Passaic, NJ $2,093 (Aug 26) 13th +0.4% 22nd 15% above peers
Centreville, VA $2,407 (Aug 26) 8th -0.1% 23rd 32% above peers
Ocala, FL $1,575 (Aug 26) 18th -0.4% 24th 14% below peers
Shawnee, KS $1,408 (Aug 26) 24th -3.1% 25th 23% below peers
Kyle, TX $1,555 (Aug 26) 19th -3.3% 26th 15% below peers
Lakewood, NJ 9th 21% above peers
Zillow Observed Rent Index through 2026-08 modeled trend: robust fit about this metric
Housing

Housing cost-burdened households

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Cost burden changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (38.1% then, 33.8% now; margin ±5.1pp).

Broader trend
23% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Cost burden fell 16.8 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (50.6% to 33.8%).
33.8%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 41.7% +0.0pp
United States ref 32.2% +0.4pp
Guaynabo zona urbana, PR 26.0% 3rd -5.2pp 1st 23% below peers
Eastvale, CA 33.8% 16th -4.3pp 2nd on par with peers
Shawnee, KS 21.8% 1st -2.1pp 3rd 36% below peers
Grand Junction, CO 31.6% 13th -2.6pp 4th 7% below peers
Lodi, CA 38.0% 20th -2.5pp 5th 12% above peers
Dale City, VA 30.4% 7th -1.8pp 6th 10% below peers
Camden, NJ 50.5% 29th -2.9pp 7th 50% above peers
Passaic, NJ 54.9% 30th -2.8pp 8th 63% above peers
Weston, FL 39.1% 24th -0.6pp 9th 16% above peers
Gaithersburg, MD 36.7% 18th -0.6pp 10th 8% above peers
Idaho Falls, ID 28.2% 4th -0.1pp 11th 16% below peers
Greenwood, IN 25.5% 2nd +0.5pp 12th 25% below peers
North Richland Hills, TX 31.3% 12th +1.0pp 13th 7% below peers
Centreville, VA 29.1% 5th +1.1pp 14th 14% below peers
Dublin, CA 32.9% 15th +1.3pp 15th 3% below peers
Lakewood, NJ 63.0% 31st +2.6pp 16th 86% above peers
Portland, ME 38.8% 22nd +1.8pp 17th 15% above peers
Casas Adobes, AZ 30.6% 9th +1.6pp 18th 9% below peers
Jackson, TN 38.9% 23rd +2.2pp 19th 15% above peers
Waukesha, WI 30.9% 11th +2.1pp 20th 8% below peers
Casa Grande, AZ 32.7% 14th +2.2pp 21st 3% below peers
Delray Beach, FL 43.0% 27th +3.1pp 22nd 27% above peers
Yuba City, CA 41.1% 25th +3.0pp 23rd 22% above peers
Bethesda, MD 29.7% 6th +2.2pp 24th 12% below peers
Dothan, AL 30.9% 10th +2.7pp 25th 9% below peers
Ocala, FL 43.1% 28th +3.8pp 26th 28% above peers
Lafayette, IN 35.4% 17th +3.7pp 27th 5% above peers
Walnut Creek, CA 38.6% 21st +4.2pp 28th 14% above peers
Schenectady, NY 42.6% 26th +4.9pp 29th 26% above peers
St. Joseph, MO 30.6% 8th +5.3pp 30th 10% below peers
Kyle, TX 37.8% 19th +7.2pp 31st 12% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 8 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHousing cost-burdened households
Loading tract map…
5 of 8 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Brentwood, NY down 14.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2017-2022
  • Delano, CA down 11.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Wheaton, MD down 7.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (tables B25070 + B25091) through 2024 ±3.7pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
★
Housing

Households without a vehicle

▼ Lower is better Turning up (early signal) ★ National leader
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

No vehicle changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (1.0% then, 2.1% now; margin ±1.2pp). The newest releases lean upward: each of the last 3 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*

Broader trend
23% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
No vehicle rose 0.2 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (1.9% to 2.1%).
Needs attention 2.1%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 7.1% -0.0pp
United States ref 8.3% -0.3pp
Idaho Falls, ID 3.3% 6th -2.8pp 1st 54% below peers
Dublin, CA 2.4% 4th -1.0pp 2nd 66% below peers
Casa Grande, AZ 4.1% 10th -1.7pp 3rd 43% below peers
Passaic, NJ 25.7% 30th -7.6pp 4th 261% above peers
Yuba City, CA 5.6% 14th -1.5pp 5th 22% below peers
Waukesha, WI 5.3% 13th -1.4pp 6th 25% below peers
Guaynabo zona urbana, PR 8.4% 20th -2.2pp 7th 19% above peers
Ocala, FL 8.9% 21st -2.0pp 8th 25% above peers
Dale City, VA 2.7% 5th -0.3pp 9th 62% below peers
Camden, NJ 30.8% 31st -3.6pp 10th 333% above peers
Lodi, CA 6.1% 15th -0.4pp 11th 14% below peers
North Richland Hills, TX 3.7% 8th -0.2pp 12th 49% below peers
Casas Adobes, AZ 5.1% 12th -0.3pp 13th 28% below peers
St. Joseph, MO 9.5% 22nd -0.4pp 14th 33% above peers
Lakewood, NJ 9.9% 24th -0.1pp 15th 40% above peers
Walnut Creek, CA 7.1% 16th -0.0pp 16th on par with peers
Schenectady, NY 21.0% 29th +0.1pp 17th 196% above peers
Delray Beach, FL 7.3% 17th +0.2pp 18th 3% above peers
Portland, ME 15.4% 28th +0.6pp 19th 117% above peers
Jackson, TN 11.8% 27th +1.0pp 20th 66% above peers
Lafayette, IN 11.0% 26th +0.9pp 21st 55% above peers
Dothan, AL 8.0% 18th +0.9pp 22nd 13% above peers
Bethesda, MD 9.6% 23rd +1.4pp 23rd 35% above peers
Weston, FL 1.7% 1st +0.3pp 24th 76% below peers
Grand Junction, CO 8.4% 19th +1.4pp 25th 18% above peers
Greenwood, IN 4.5% 11th +0.9pp 26th 37% below peers
Shawnee, KS 3.8% 9th +1.0pp 27th 46% below peers
Gaithersburg, MD 10.4% 25th +2.8pp 28th 46% above peers
Centreville, VA 3.4% 7th +1.3pp 29th 52% below peers
Kyle, TX 1.9% 2nd +0.8pp 30th 73% below peers
Eastvale, CA 2.1% 3rd +1.1pp 31st 71% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 8 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHouseholds without a vehicle
Loading tract map…
5 of 8 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Prescott Valley, AZ down 1.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Apopka, FL down 2.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Sandy, UT down 1.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B08201) through 2024 ±1.1pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys *Early signal: consecutive releases agree on direction only; the size of the newest movement is not measurable from overlapping surveys. about this metric
See all Housing data →
Health 3 indicators
★
Health

People without health insurance

▼ Lower is better Turning down (early signal) ★ Strong performer
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (4.1% then, 3.9% now; margin ±1.1pp). The newest releases lean downward: each of the last 4 annual updates moved the 5-year average the same way - an early signal, not a measured change.*

Broader trend
53% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Uninsured fell 9.2 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (13.1% to 3.9%).
Bright spot 3.9%
20132024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 6.6% -0.9pp
United States ref 8.4% -0.4pp
Lakewood, NJ 4.1% 6th -3.8pp 1st 43% below peers
Guaynabo zona urbana, PR 3.8% 4th -2.4pp 2nd 47% below peers
Dublin, CA 1.6% 1st -1.0pp 3rd 78% below peers
Greenwood, IN 5.5% 10th -3.3pp 4th 23% below peers
Lafayette, IN 7.5% 17th -3.8pp 5th 4% above peers
Yuba City, CA 5.9% 13th -2.7pp 6th 17% below peers
Portland, ME 5.0% 8th -1.9pp 7th 31% below peers
Dale City, VA 10.7% 22nd -3.7pp 8th 50% above peers
Schenectady, NY 5.0% 7th -1.5pp 9th 31% below peers
Delray Beach, FL 9.8% 20th -2.5pp 10th 36% above peers
Shawnee, KS 5.0% 9th -1.2pp 11th 30% below peers
Weston, FL 5.6% 11th -1.0pp 12th 22% below peers
Walnut Creek, CA 2.4% 3rd -0.4pp 13th 67% below peers
Ocala, FL 12.3% 26th -1.5pp 14th 71% above peers
Casas Adobes, AZ 6.0% 14th -0.7pp 15th 16% below peers
Centreville, VA 7.2% 16th -0.8pp 16th on par with peers
Idaho Falls, ID 8.7% 18th -0.7pp 17th 21% above peers
Eastvale, CA 3.9% 5th -0.3pp 18th 46% below peers
Passaic, NJ 22.6% 31st -0.4pp 19th 215% above peers
Lodi, CA 6.7% 15th +0.1pp 20th 6% below peers
Kyle, TX 12.3% 25th +0.6pp 21st 71% above peers
Jackson, TN 10.7% 21st +0.7pp 22nd 49% above peers
Grand Junction, CO 9.4% 19th +0.6pp 23rd 31% above peers
North Richland Hills, TX 12.8% 28th +0.9pp 24th 78% above peers
Dothan, AL 11.1% 23rd +1.1pp 25th 55% above peers
St. Joseph, MO 12.3% 27th +1.4pp 26th 71% above peers
Bethesda, MD 2.1% 2nd +0.3pp 27th 70% below peers
Waukesha, WI 5.9% 12th +0.8pp 28th 18% below peers
Casa Grande, AZ 11.2% 24th +2.1pp 29th 56% above peers
Camden, NJ 14.7% 30th +3.2pp 30th 105% above peers
Gaithersburg, MD 14.4% 29th +4.9pp 31st 100% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 8 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthPeople without health insurance
Loading tract map…
5 of 8 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Mountain View, CA down 2.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Brookline, MA down 1.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Minnetonka, MN down 1.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.8pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys *Early signal: consecutive releases agree on direction only; the size of the newest movement is not measurable from overlapping surveys. about this metric
Health

Adult obesity

▼ Lower is better Level only
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Adult obesity is about three-quarters of the peer median.

27.6%
20202022
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 30 similar-size cities best first
Place Latest Today's rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 28.4%
United States ref 33.4%
Dublin, CA 15.4% 1st 56% below peers
Bethesda, MD 20.7% 2nd 41% below peers
Gaithersburg, MD 24.9% 3rd 28% below peers
Walnut Creek, CA 25.2% 4th 28% below peers
Centreville, VA 26.1% 5th 25% below peers
Weston, FL 26.3% 6th 24% below peers
Eastvale, CA 27.6% 7th 21% below peers
Casas Adobes, AZ 29.9% 8th 14% below peers
Portland, ME 30.1% 9th 14% below peers
Delray Beach, FL 30.8% 10th 11% below peers
Grand Junction, CO 30.9% 11th 11% below peers
Yuba City, CA 31.3% 12th 10% below peers
Shawnee, KS 33.1% 13th 5% below peers
Kyle, TX 33.9% 14th 3% below peers
Dale City, VA 34.7% 15th on par with peers
Waukesha, WI 34.8% 16th on par with peers
Lodi, CA 35.1% 17th 1% above peers
North Richland Hills, TX 35.8% 18th 3% above peers
Idaho Falls, ID 35.9% 19th 3% above peers
Passaic, NJ 36.0% 20th 3% above peers
Lafayette, IN 36.7% 21st 5% above peers
Dothan, AL 37.5% 22nd 8% above peers
Lakewood, NJ 38.0% 23rd 9% above peers
Schenectady, NY 38.6% 24th 11% above peers
Ocala, FL 39.5% 25th 14% above peers
Casa Grande, AZ 39.6% 26th 14% above peers
St. Joseph, MO 40.8% 27th 17% above peers
Greenwood, IN 41.0% 28th 18% above peers
Jackson, TN 41.1% 29th 18% above peers
Camden, NJ 43.6% 30th 25% above peers
CDC PLACES through 2022 modeled tract map about this metric
★
Health

Children without health insurance

▼ Lower is better No measurable change ★ National leader
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Child uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (1.0% then, 1.3% now; margin ±0.9pp).

Broader trend
43% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Child uninsured fell 3.8 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (5.2% to 1.3%).
Bright spot 1.3%
20122024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 3.2% -0.0pp
United States ref 5.5% +0.4pp
Guaynabo zona urbana, PR 0.5% 1st -0.8pp 1st 88% below peers
Portland, ME 1.0% 3rd -1.3pp 2nd 78% below peers
Shawnee, KS 1.6% 6th -2.0pp 3rd 64% below peers
Greenwood, IN 4.3% 16th -3.4pp 4th on par with peers
Yuba City, CA 2.8% 11th -2.1pp 5th 35% below peers
Lakewood, NJ 0.9% 2nd -0.7pp 6th 79% below peers
Lafayette, IN 3.3% 13th -2.0pp 7th 23% below peers
Dale City, VA 6.2% 24th -2.2pp 8th 44% above peers
Schenectady, NY 2.2% 8th -0.7pp 9th 50% below peers
Walnut Creek, CA 1.1% 4th -0.2pp 10th 74% below peers
Delray Beach, FL 6.0% 22nd -0.7pp 11th 38% above peers
Kyle, TX 8.3% 27th -1.0pp 12th 93% above peers
Passaic, NJ 5.7% 19th -0.0pp 13th 33% above peers
Centreville, VA 5.8% 20th +0.4pp 14th 35% above peers
St. Joseph, MO 5.2% 17th +0.5pp 15th 19% above peers
Casas Adobes, AZ 5.3% 18th +1.0pp 16th 24% above peers
Weston, FL 6.2% 23rd +1.2pp 17th 43% above peers
Lodi, CA 3.0% 12th +0.7pp 18th 31% below peers
Eastvale, CA 1.3% 5th +0.3pp 19th 69% below peers
Waukesha, WI 2.6% 10th +0.7pp 20th 41% below peers
Jackson, TN 5.9% 21st +1.8pp 21st 36% above peers
Dothan, AL 3.6% 14th +1.1pp 22nd 17% below peers
North Richland Hills, TX 12.0% 31st +4.7pp 23rd 178% above peers
Idaho Falls, ID 3.8% 15th +1.6pp 24th 13% below peers
Casa Grande, AZ 10.5% 30th +4.7pp 25th 144% above peers
Camden, NJ 8.0% 25th +4.1pp 26th 84% above peers
Grand Junction, CO 8.1% 26th +4.2pp 27th 87% above peers
Ocala, FL 9.8% 29th +5.6pp 28th 128% above peers
Gaithersburg, MD 9.6% 28th +5.7pp 29th 122% above peers
Bethesda, MD 2.4% 9th +1.6pp 30th 44% below peers
Dublin, CA 1.6% 7th +1.1pp 31st 62% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 8 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthChildren without health insurance
Loading tract map…
5 of 8 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Newport Beach, CA down 1.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Royal Oak, MI down 1.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Troy, NY down 1.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 97% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B27001) through 2024 ±0.7pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Health data →
Education 3 indicators
Education

Adults with a bachelor's degree or higher

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

College attainment rose 6.3 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 37.1% to 43.4% - more than the combined survey margin (±3.6pp).

Broader trend
55% of similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. Eastvale started mid-pack and has reached a genuinely better level; worth investigating.
Longer view
College attainment rose 8.6 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (34.7% to 43.4%).
Bright spot 43.4%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 37.1% +3.1pp
United States ref 35.7% +3.5pp
Casa Grande, AZ 21.7% 27th +5.4pp 1st 35% below peers
Ocala, FL 31.2% 19th +7.0pp 2nd 7% below peers
Lodi, CA 24.6% 25th +5.4pp 3rd 27% below peers
Casas Adobes, AZ 42.5% 11th +7.5pp 4th 27% above peers
Dale City, VA 33.5% 15th +5.0pp 5th on par with peers
Eastvale, CA 43.4% 10th +6.3pp 6th 29% above peers
Schenectady, NY 25.4% 24th +3.6pp 7th 24% below peers
Delray Beach, FL 43.8% 9th +5.4pp 8th 30% above peers
Portland, ME 59.7% 5th +7.1pp 9th 78% above peers
St. Joseph, MO 23.0% 26th +2.5pp 10th 32% below peers
North Richland Hills, TX 37.3% 14th +3.7pp 11th 11% above peers
Shawnee, KS 53.1% 7th +4.8pp 12th 58% above peers
Grand Junction, CO 38.1% 13th +3.4pp 13th 13% above peers
Waukesha, WI 41.7% 12th +3.7pp 14th 24% above peers
Lafayette, IN 27.9% 21st +2.4pp 15th 17% below peers
Dothan, AL 27.6% 23rd +2.1pp 16th 18% below peers
Yuba City, CA 20.4% 28th +1.5pp 17th 39% below peers
Greenwood, IN 33.4% 16th +2.3pp 18th 1% below peers
Weston, FL 67.6% 4th +4.6pp 19th 101% above peers
Passaic, NJ 16.7% 29th +1.0pp 20th 50% below peers
Walnut Creek, CA 70.4% 2nd +3.7pp 21st 110% above peers
Dublin, CA 69.8% 3rd +3.4pp 22nd 108% above peers
Camden, NJ 10.1% 30th +0.3pp 23rd 70% below peers
Idaho Falls, ID 31.7% 18th +1.0pp 24th 6% below peers
Kyle, TX 31.0% 20th +0.8pp 25th 8% below peers
Bethesda, MD 87.1% 1st +1.2pp 26th 160% above peers
Lakewood, NJ 31.9% 17th +0.4pp 27th 5% below peers
Jackson, TN 27.8% 22nd +0.1pp 28th 17% below peers
Centreville, VA 58.2% 6th +0.0pp 29th 74% above peers
Gaithersburg, MD 52.5% 8th -1.6pp 30th 56% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 8 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationAdults with a bachelor's degree or higher
Loading tract map…
5 of 8 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Apopka, FL up 11.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Troy, NY up 10.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Burleson, TX up 7.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 95% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±2.7pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Education

Children ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool

▲ Higher is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Preschool enrollment changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (43.7% then, 53.4% now; margin ±18.5pp).

Broader trend
17% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Preschool enrollment rose 6.9 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (46.6% to 53.4%).
Bright spot 53.4%
20112024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 44.5% -5.1pp
United States ref 45.5%
Kyle, TX 53.1% 11th +18.3pp 1st 13% above peers
Centreville, VA 68.9% 4th +17.9pp 2nd 46% above peers
Grand Junction, CO 47.4% 15th +9.5pp 3rd on par with peers
Schenectady, NY 53.4% 9th +10.6pp 4th 13% above peers
Delray Beach, FL 66.0% 6th +12.3pp 5th 40% above peers
Eastvale, CA 53.4% 10th +9.7pp 6th 13% above peers
Dale City, VA 29.3% 25th +4.8pp 7th 38% below peers
Casas Adobes, AZ 53.1% 12th +1.9pp 8th 12% above peers
St. Joseph, MO 41.3% 19th +1.4pp 9th 13% below peers
Dothan, AL 45.9% 17th +1.2pp 10th 3% below peers
Waukesha, WI 50.7% 13th +1.1pp 11th 7% above peers
Greenwood, IN 26.0% 30th +0.4pp 12th 45% below peers
Passaic, NJ 67.2% 5th +1.0pp 13th 42% above peers
Dublin, CA 63.8% 7th +0.1pp 14th 35% above peers
Weston, FL 71.2% 2nd -1.7pp 15th 51% above peers
Portland, ME 47.2% 16th -1.3pp 16th on par with peers
Lakewood, NJ 53.9% 8th -1.5pp 17th 14% above peers
Casa Grande, AZ 26.7% 29th -2.2pp 18th 43% below peers
Guaynabo zona urbana, PR 70.6% 3rd -7.3pp 19th 50% above peers
Bethesda, MD 75.1% 1st -11.6pp 20th 59% above peers
Shawnee, KS 45.1% 18th -10.6pp 21st 5% below peers
North Richland Hills, TX 38.1% 21st -11.2pp 22nd 19% below peers
Ocala, FL 37.1% 22nd -11.2pp 23rd 21% below peers
Yuba City, CA 32.4% 23rd -10.2pp 24th 31% below peers
Lodi, CA 25.9% 31st -9.4pp 25th 45% below peers
Idaho Falls, ID 27.3% 28th -10.1pp 26th 42% below peers
Lafayette, IN 27.5% 27th -11.7pp 27th 42% below peers
Walnut Creek, CA 47.5% 14th -20.7pp 28th on par with peers
Jackson, TN 30.9% 24th -17.7pp 29th 34% below peers
Gaithersburg, MD 29.2% 26th -24.1pp 30th 38% below peers
Camden, NJ 39.2% 20th -34.3pp 31st 17% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 8 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationChildren ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool
Loading tract map…
5 of 8 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • West Haven, CT up 35.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Castle Rock, CO up 21.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 96% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Cedar Park, TX up 20.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 94% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±16.5pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Education

Teens not in school and not working

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Disconnected youth changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (5.4% then, 6.1% now; margin ±5.1pp).

Broader trend
13% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Disconnected youth fell 3.2 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (9.3% to 6.1%).
6.1%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 6.7% +0.2pp
United States ref 6.9% +0.3pp
Walnut Creek, CA 2.3% 2nd -2.7pp 1st 61% below peers
Passaic, NJ 7.6% 23rd -7.9pp 2nd 29% above peers
Guaynabo zona urbana, PR 4.0% 9th -4.1pp 3rd 32% below peers
Grand Junction, CO 3.6% 6th -3.3pp 4th 38% below peers
Dothan, AL 5.2% 12th -4.4pp 5th 13% below peers
Jackson, TN 5.5% 14th -4.1pp 6th 6% below peers
Lakewood, NJ 2.1% 1st -1.3pp 7th 65% below peers
Schenectady, NY 6.6% 18th -3.2pp 8th 12% above peers
Dublin, CA 2.5% 3rd -1.0pp 9th 58% below peers
Idaho Falls, ID 9.0% 25th -1.6pp 10th 52% above peers
North Richland Hills, TX 5.2% 13th +0.1pp 11th 12% below peers
Kyle, TX 7.3% 21st +0.2pp 12th 24% above peers
Centreville, VA 4.3% 11th +0.3pp 13th 27% below peers
Camden, NJ 11.3% 29th +0.8pp 14th 92% above peers
Casas Adobes, AZ 5.8% 15th +0.5pp 15th 2% below peers
Eastvale, CA 6.1% 17th +0.7pp 16th 3% above peers
Dale City, VA 3.1% 4th +0.4pp 17th 47% below peers
Yuba City, CA 7.4% 22nd +1.0pp 18th 25% above peers
Lodi, CA 10.4% 27th +1.5pp 19th 76% above peers
Lafayette, IN 8.9% 24th +1.3pp 20th 52% above peers
St. Joseph, MO 10.4% 28th +1.8pp 21st 77% above peers
Weston, FL 3.9% 7th +1.2pp 22nd 35% below peers
Portland, ME 9.4% 26th +3.1pp 23rd 59% above peers
Ocala, FL 13.2% 30th +6.2pp 24th 123% above peers
Gaithersburg, MD 7.2% 20th +3.4pp 25th 22% above peers
Casa Grande, AZ 20.8% 31st +10.2pp 26th 252% above peers
Shawnee, KS 5.9% 16th +3.2pp 27th on par with peers
Delray Beach, FL 3.9% 8th +2.6pp 28th 34% below peers
Greenwood, IN 4.3% 10th +3.1pp 29th 27% below peers
Waukesha, WI 6.8% 19th +4.8pp 30th 15% above peers
Bethesda, MD 3.2% 5th +2.9pp 31st 46% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 8 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationTeens not in school and not working
Loading tract map…
5 of 8 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Alpharetta, GA down 6.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Eagan, MN down 4.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Johns Creek, GA down 4.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B14005) through 2024 ±3.6pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Education data →
Demographics 4 indicators
Demographics

Population

No better direction Rising
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Population rose about 14% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 62,046 to 70,633 - more than the combined survey margin (±69).

Broader trend
67% of similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction; 20% moved the other way.
Longer view
Population rose about 28% from 2014 to 2024 (55,298 to 70,633).
Big move 70,633
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Kyle, TX 56,823 31st +33% 1st 18% below peers
Lakewood, NJ 69,585 16th +24% 2nd on par with peers
Dublin, CA 70,803 9th +16% 3rd 2% above peers
Greenwood, IN 66,029 29th +14% 4th 5% below peers
Eastvale, CA 70,633 11th +14% 5th 2% above peers
Ocala, FL 66,584 28th +12% 6th 4% below peers
Idaho Falls, ID 67,725 26th +10% 7th 3% below peers
Bethesda, MD 69,397 18th +10% 8th on par with peers
Grand Junction, CO 68,142 24th +10% 9th 2% below peers
Casa Grande, AZ 60,905 30th +9% 10th 12% below peers
Schenectady, NY 68,847 20th +5% 11th 1% below peers
Dothan, AL 71,514 3rd +5% 12th 3% above peers
Shawnee, KS 68,542 22nd +5% 13th 1% below peers
Yuba City, CA 69,471 17th +4% 14th on par with peers
Guaynabo zona urbana, PR 70,599 12th +4% 15th 1% above peers
Portland, ME 68,854 19th +3% 16th 1% below peers
Gaithersburg, MD 69,825 15th +3% 17th on par with peers
Casas Adobes, AZ 72,059 1st +3% 18th 4% above peers
Lodi, CA 67,607 27th +3% 19th 3% below peers
Jackson, TN 68,435 23rd +2% 20th 2% below peers
North Richland Hills, TX 70,780 10th +1% 21st 2% above peers
Walnut Creek, CA 70,088 13th +1% 22nd 1% above peers
Passaic, NJ 70,002 14th -0% 23rd 1% above peers
Delray Beach, FL 67,979 25th -0% 24th 2% below peers
Waukesha, WI 71,233 6th -2% 25th 2% above peers
Lafayette, IN 71,159 7th -2% 26th 2% above peers
Dale City, VA 71,016 8th -2% 27th 2% above peers
Weston, FL 68,837 21st -3% 28th 1% below peers
Centreville, VA 71,706 2nd -3% 29th 3% above peers
Camden, NJ 71,496 4th -3% 30th 3% above peers
St. Joseph, MO 71,236 5th -6% 31st 2% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 8 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsPopulation
Loading tract map…
5 of 8 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±47 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Children's share of the population

No better direction Falling
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Children fell 2.5 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 30.4% to 28.0% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.0pp).

Broader trend
47% of similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.
Longer view
Children fell 2.5 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (30.4% to 28.0%).
Big move 28.0%
20172024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 22.0% -1.0pp
United States ref 21.9% -0.7pp
Lafayette, IN 23.4% 15th +1.2pp 1st 1% above peers
Bethesda, MD 23.2% 16th +0.8pp 2nd on par with peers
Jackson, TN 24.4% 11th +0.5pp 3rd 5% above peers
Dale City, VA 26.6% 7th +0.1pp 4th 15% above peers
Gaithersburg, MD 22.7% 17th -0.2pp 5th 2% below peers
Lakewood, NJ 51.2% 1st -0.9pp 6th 121% above peers
Portland, ME 15.4% 29th -0.3pp 7th 34% below peers
Schenectady, NY 19.9% 24th -0.4pp 8th 14% below peers
Dothan, AL 22.6% 18th -0.5pp 9th 3% below peers
Casas Adobes, AZ 18.0% 26th -0.4pp 10th 23% below peers
Ocala, FL 22.1% 20th -0.6pp 11th 4% below peers
St. Joseph, MO 22.1% 21st -0.6pp 12th 5% below peers
Idaho Falls, ID 27.8% 4th -1.0pp 13th 20% above peers
Yuba City, CA 24.8% 10th -0.9pp 14th 7% above peers
Delray Beach, FL 13.4% 31st -0.7pp 15th 42% below peers
North Richland Hills, TX 22.1% 22nd -1.2pp 16th 5% below peers
Shawnee, KS 23.8% 13th -1.5pp 17th 3% above peers
Dublin, CA 25.0% 9th -1.6pp 18th 8% above peers
Weston, FL 27.2% 6th -1.9pp 19th 17% above peers
Passaic, NJ 30.1% 2nd -2.1pp 20th 30% above peers
Eastvale, CA 28.0% 3rd -2.5pp 21st 21% above peers
Waukesha, WI 19.2% 25th -1.8pp 22nd 17% below peers
Walnut Creek, CA 15.5% 28th -1.5pp 23rd 33% below peers
Centreville, VA 21.7% 23rd -2.5pp 24th 7% below peers
Camden, NJ 27.5% 5th -3.4pp 25th 19% above peers
Greenwood, IN 23.5% 14th -2.9pp 26th 1% above peers
Kyle, TX 25.4% 8th -3.2pp 27th 10% above peers
Casa Grande, AZ 22.5% 19th -3.1pp 28th 3% below peers
Lodi, CA 24.1% 12th -3.7pp 29th 4% above peers
Guaynabo zona urbana, PR 14.7% 30th -2.4pp 30th 37% below peers
Grand Junction, CO 17.3% 27th -2.9pp 31st 25% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 8 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren's share of the population
Loading tract map…
5 of 8 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.8pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Children in single-parent families

No better direction No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Single-parent changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (16.5% then, 11.2% now; margin ±5.4pp).

Broader trend
10% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Single-parent fell 1.8 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (13.0% to 11.2%).
Big move 11.2%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 28.5% +0.7pp
United States ref 29.9% -0.2pp
Lakewood, NJ 7.8% 31st +3.6pp 1st 73% below peers
Kyle, TX 29.0% 16th +7.2pp 2nd on par with peers
Centreville, VA 20.4% 24th +4.1pp 3rd 30% below peers
Lafayette, IN 50.7% 3rd +9.3pp 4th 75% above peers
Bethesda, MD 11.5% 28th +2.1pp 5th 60% below peers
Passaic, NJ 51.4% 2nd +9.3pp 6th 77% above peers
Portland, ME 32.1% 13th +4.5pp 7th 11% above peers
Waukesha, WI 32.5% 12th +4.6pp 8th 12% above peers
Delray Beach, FL 38.2% 10th +4.1pp 9th 32% above peers
Dothan, AL 47.6% 5th +3.2pp 10th 64% above peers
Casas Adobes, AZ 29.1% 15th +1.7pp 11th on par with peers
Ocala, FL 44.0% 7th +2.0pp 12th 52% above peers
Idaho Falls, ID 25.6% 20th +0.7pp 13th 12% below peers
Weston, FL 14.5% 27th +0.4pp 14th 50% below peers
Grand Junction, CO 29.7% 14th +0.7pp 15th 2% above peers
Camden, NJ 75.7% 1st +0.3pp 16th 161% above peers
St. Joseph, MO 41.3% 9th +0.0pp 17th 42% above peers
Gaithersburg, MD 23.6% 21st -0.6pp 18th 19% below peers
Jackson, TN 50.5% 4th -2.6pp 19th 74% above peers
Lodi, CA 27.2% 19th -1.6pp 20th 6% below peers
Guaynabo zona urbana, PR 42.4% 8th -2.8pp 21st 46% above peers
Greenwood, IN 28.7% 17th -2.9pp 22nd 1% below peers
Dale City, VA 21.0% 23rd -2.2pp 23rd 28% below peers
Casa Grande, AZ 36.9% 11th -3.9pp 24th 27% above peers
Yuba City, CA 27.2% 18th -3.4pp 25th 6% below peers
Walnut Creek, CA 17.0% 25th -2.5pp 26th 41% below peers
Schenectady, NY 47.5% 6th -7.3pp 27th 64% above peers
Shawnee, KS 15.5% 26th -5.0pp 28th 47% below peers
Dublin, CA 9.2% 30th -3.2pp 29th 68% below peers
North Richland Hills, TX 23.3% 22nd -10.6pp 30th 20% below peers
Eastvale, CA 11.2% 29th -5.3pp 31st 61% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 8 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren in single-parent families
Loading tract map…
5 of 8 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B09002) through 2024 ±3.0pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Young children with all parents in the labor force

No better direction No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →
What changed

Working parents changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (73.1% then, 78.6% now; margin ±14.5pp).

Broader trend
23% of similar-size cities show a real change in either direction.
Longer view
Working parents rose 18.4 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (60.2% to 78.6%).
Big move 78.6%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 66.5% +3.8pp
United States ref 68.1% +1.9pp
Weston, FL 62.8% 26th +16.8pp 1st 7% below peers
Passaic, NJ 69.7% 15th +14.6pp 2nd 3% above peers
Grand Junction, CO 65.7% 18th +13.0pp 3rd 3% below peers
Kyle, TX 70.1% 12th +10.4pp 4th 4% above peers
Gaithersburg, MD 74.9% 6th +10.4pp 5th 11% above peers
Waukesha, WI 80.8% 1st +9.1pp 6th 20% above peers
Centreville, VA 80.2% 2nd +8.5pp 7th 19% above peers
Lodi, CA 62.8% 27th +6.5pp 8th 7% below peers
Delray Beach, FL 79.1% 3rd +6.5pp 9th 17% above peers
Eastvale, CA 78.6% 4th +5.5pp 10th 17% above peers
Walnut Creek, CA 69.7% 14th +4.7pp 11th 3% above peers
Schenectady, NY 73.2% 7th +2.1pp 12th 9% above peers
St. Joseph, MO 70.5% 10th +1.7pp 13th 5% above peers
Greenwood, IN 69.7% 13th +1.3pp 14th 3% above peers
Dublin, CA 63.9% 25th -0.3pp 15th 5% below peers
Shawnee, KS 76.8% 5th -1.1pp 16th 14% above peers
Ocala, FL 70.4% 11th -1.2pp 17th 4% above peers
Jackson, TN 67.4% 16th -1.2pp 18th on par with peers
Camden, NJ 71.2% 9th -1.8pp 19th 6% above peers
Portland, ME 71.6% 8th -2.0pp 20th 6% above peers
Casas Adobes, AZ 64.9% 22nd -2.1pp 21st 4% below peers
Casa Grande, AZ 64.2% 24th -2.3pp 22nd 5% below peers
Idaho Falls, ID 53.8% 29th -2.2pp 23rd 20% below peers
Yuba City, CA 53.7% 30th -3.5pp 24th 20% below peers
Lafayette, IN 66.0% 17th -4.6pp 25th 2% below peers
Dothan, AL 65.4% 20th -5.6pp 26th 3% below peers
Dale City, VA 65.2% 21st -6.2pp 27th 3% below peers
Bethesda, MD 64.5% 23rd -8.4pp 28th 4% below peers
North Richland Hills, TX 62.1% 28th -12.8pp 29th 8% below peers
Guaynabo zona urbana, PR 65.7% 19th -13.7pp 30th 3% below peers
Lakewood, NJ 29.3% 31st -13.8pp 31st 56% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 8 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsYoung children with all parents in the labor force
Loading tract map…
5 of 8 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B23008) through 2024 ±12.0pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Demographics data →