DataWorks Commons
Yucaipa, CA
← All cities

Yucaipa, CA

See all data for this place →
54,421 people (2024) 50k-100k West

Bright spots 8 indicators

Where Yucaipa, CA shows a real improvement in recent years, or stands clearly ahead of its peers. How this is calculated →
Disconnected youth
Teens not in school and not working
2.8%
2020-24
▼ 71%
relative change
9.7% in 2019
Real improvement Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Household income
Median household income
$90,794
2020-24
▲ 31%
relative change
$69,104 in 2019
Real improvement Trailing peers
Learn more ↓
Broadband
Households with a broadband internet subscription
92.4%
2020-24
▲ 9%
relative change
84.7% in 2019
Real improvement Trailing peers
Learn more ↓
Unemployment
Unemployment rate
4.1%
May 2026
▼ 5%
relative change
4.3% a year earlier
Holding up better than peers Trailing peers
Learn more ↓
Homeownership
Homeownership rate
73.4%
2020-24
▲ 1%
relative change
72.6% in 2019
No measurable change Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Child poverty
Share of children below the poverty level
9.1%
2020-24
▼ 10%
relative change
10.1% in 2019
No measurable change Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Poverty
Share of people below the poverty level
9.0%
2020-24
▼ 11%
relative change
10.2% in 2019
No measurable change Leading peers
Learn more ↓
Uninsured
People without health insurance
5.7%
2020-24
▲ 2%
relative change
5.5% in 2019
No measurable change Trailing peers
Learn more ↓

What needs attention 4 indicators

Where Yucaipa, CA shows a real worsening in recent years, or trails its peers clearly. How this is calculated →
Child uninsured
Children without health insurance
4.2%
2020-24
▲ 136%
relative change
1.8% in 2019
Worsening Trailing peers
Learn more ↓
Preschool enrollment
Children ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool
24.0%
2020-24
▼ 49%
relative change
47.3% in 2019
Worsening Trailing peers
Learn more ↓
Cost burden
Housing cost-burdened households
36.4%
2020-24
▲ 23%
relative change
29.6% in 2019
Worsening Leading peers
Learn more ↓
College attainment
Adults with a bachelor's degree or higher
26.9%
2020-24
▲ 10%
relative change
24.4% in 2019
No measurable change Trailing peers
Learn more ↓

Big shifts 6 indicators

Real moves and big gaps, where neither direction is simply good or bad. Biggest relative change first; big-gap cards come last. How this is calculated →
Starter homes
Starter home value (bottom tier)
$464,615
Jun 2026
▲ 3%
relative change
$452,887 a year earlier
Rising recently Among the highest of peers
Learn more ↓
Population
54,421
2020-24
▲ 2%
relative change
53,416 in 2019
Rising Among the lowest of peers
Learn more ↓
Home value
Typical home value
$574,974
Jun 2026
▲ 1%
relative change
$567,359 a year earlier
Rising recently Among the lowest of peers
Learn more ↓
Rent
Typical asking rent
$2,095
Jun 2026
▲ 1%
relative change
$2,073 a year earlier
Rising recently Among the lowest of peers
Learn more ↓
Children
Children's share of the population
26.2%
2020-24
▲ 6%
relative change
24.8% in 2019
No measurable change Among the highest of peers
Learn more ↓
Working parents
Young children with all parents in the labor force
57.8%
2020-24
▼ 8%
relative change
63.2% in 2019
No measurable change Among the lowest of peers
Learn more ↓

All indicators

Economy
Economy

Median household income

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Household income rose about 31% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from $69,104 to $90,794 (each survey's own dollars, not adjusted for inflation) - more than the combined survey margin (±$9,557). 28 of the 29 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started mid-pack and has reached a genuinely better level; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 28 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: household income rose about 55% from 2014 to 2024 ($58,506 to $90,794).
$90,794
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref $99,122 +32%
United States ref $80,734 +28%
San Jacinto, CA $80,647 14th +55% 1st 8% above peers
Plainfield, NJ $85,908 13th +52% 2nd 16% above peers
Pensacola, FL $74,212 17th +47% 3rd on par with peers
Logan, UT $60,687 24th +45% 4th 18% below peers
Valdosta, GA $45,925 31st +41% 5th 38% below peers
Texas City, TX $68,776 19th +41% 6th 8% below peers
Kentwood, MI $74,373 16th +37% 7th on par with peers
Rocky Mount, NC $55,534 28th +37% 8th 25% below peers
Tinley Park, IL $105,189 8th +34% 9th 41% above peers
Colton, CA $71,208 18th +32% 10th 4% below peers
Peabody, MA $96,657 10th +32% 11th 30% above peers
West Sacramento, CA $93,188 11th +32% 12th 25% above peers
Yucaipa, CA $90,794 12th +31% 13th 22% above peers
Winter Haven, FL $59,648 26th +28% 14th 20% below peers
Pinellas Park, FL $63,432 21st +28% 15th 15% below peers
Mount Prospect, IL $101,720 9th +28% 16th 37% above peers
Hacienda Heights, CA $109,193 6th +27% 17th 47% above peers
Anderson, IN $46,909 30th +27% 18th 37% below peers
Elkhart, IN $51,028 29th +25% 19th 31% below peers
Westfield, IN $122,789 1st +25% 20th 65% above peers
Arcadia, CA $113,516 4th +21% 21st 53% above peers
Little Elm, TX $119,219 3rd +21% 22nd 60% above peers
Twin Falls, ID $61,205 23rd +21% 23rd 18% below peers
Manhattan, KS $60,172 25th +19% 24th 19% below peers
West Haven, CT $74,382 15th +18% 25th on par with peers
Chicopee, MA $62,615 22nd +18% 26th 16% below peers
Wheaton, IL $120,008 2nd +16% 27th 61% above peers
Galveston, TX $55,631 27th +13% 28th 25% below peers
Normal, IL $64,785 20th +11% 29th 13% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA $108,281 7th +9% 30th 46% above peers
Methuen, MA $113,310 5th 52% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 11 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyMedian household income
Loading tract map…
6 of 11 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Bozeman, MT up about 54% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Malden, MA up about 52% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Plainfield, NJ up about 52% between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±$8,342 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Unemployment rate

▼ Lower is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Unemployment rose about 0.3 percentage points a year from 2022 to 2025. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening faster than 59% of similar-size cities over 2022-2025.
Longer view: unemployment fell about 0.1 percentage points a year from 2015 to 2025.
Most recent monthly reading: 4.1% in May 2026, down from 4.3% a year earlier.
4.1%
1990May 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 5.3% (May 26) -0.2pp
United States ref 4.2% (Jun 26) +0.1pp
Plainfield, NJ 5.0% (May 26) 24th -1.2pp 1st 16% above peers
Elkhart, IN 3.5% (May 26) 5th -1.0pp 2nd 19% below peers
Colton, CA 4.6% (May 26) 18th -0.8pp 3rd 7% above peers
Chicopee, MA 4.7% (May 26) 20th -0.5pp 4th 9% above peers
Anderson, IN 3.7% (May 26) 6th -0.5pp 5th 14% below peers
San Jacinto, CA 5.7% (May 26) 28th -0.3pp 6th 33% above peers
Valdosta, GA 3.8% (May 26) 8th -0.3pp 7th 12% below peers
Yucaipa, CA 4.1% (May 26) 9th -0.2pp 8th 5% below peers
Westfield, IN 2.6% (May 26) 1st -0.2pp 9th 40% below peers
Kentwood, MI 5.1% (May 26) 25th -0.1pp 10th 19% above peers
Methuen, MA 4.6% (May 26) 19th -0.1pp 11th 7% above peers
Logan, UT 3.0% (May 26) 2nd -0.1pp 12th 30% below peers
West Sacramento, CA 4.4% (May 26) 17th -0.1pp 13th 2% above peers
Rocky Mount, NC 5.8% (May 26) 30th +0.0pp 14th 35% above peers
Peabody, MA 4.3% (May 26) 13th +0.0pp 15th on par with peers
Arcadia, CA 4.8% (May 26) 23rd +0.1pp 16th 12% above peers
Twin Falls, ID 3.2% (May 26) 3rd +0.1pp 17th 26% below peers
Galveston, TX 4.2% (May 26) 11th +0.2pp 18th 2% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA 4.7% (May 26) 21st +0.2pp 19th 9% above peers
Normal, IL 3.7% (May 26) 7th +0.4pp 20th 14% below peers
Manhattan, KS 3.3% (May 26) 4th +0.5pp 21st 23% below peers
Little Elm, TX 4.2% (May 26) 12th +0.5pp 22nd 2% below peers
Texas City, TX 5.5% (May 26) 27th +0.6pp 23rd 28% above peers
Wheaton, IL 4.3% (May 26) 14th +0.7pp 24th on par with peers
Tinley Park, IL 4.7% (May 26) 22nd +0.8pp 25th 9% above peers
Pensacola, FL 4.3% (May 26) 15th +0.9pp 26th on par with peers
Mount Prospect, IL 4.3% (May 26) 16th +0.9pp 27th on par with peers
Pinellas Park, FL 4.1% (May 26) 10th +1.0pp 28th 5% below peers
Winter Haven, FL 5.4% (May 26) 26th +1.0pp 29th 26% above peers
West Haven, CT 5.7% (May 26) 29th +1.2pp 30th 33% above peers
BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics through 2025 administrative trend: robust fit about this metric
Economy

Share of people below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Poverty changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (10.2% then, 9.0% now; margin ±2.5pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 13 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: poverty fell 7.1 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (16.2% to 9.1%).
9.0%
20112024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 11.8% -1.3pp
United States ref 12.0%
Westfield, IN 3.6% 1st -2.3pp 1st 73% below peers
Tinley Park, IL 5.0% 2nd -2.1pp 2nd 62% below peers
Pensacola, FL 12.5% 13th -4.7pp 3rd 5% below peers
Plainfield, NJ 15.2% 18th -5.6pp 4th 15% above peers
Twin Falls, ID 11.2% 11th -3.3pp 5th 15% below peers
Valdosta, GA 24.9% 30th -6.1pp 6th 89% above peers
Logan, UT 20.5% 28th -4.8pp 7th 56% above peers
Elkhart, IN 17.9% 23rd -3.6pp 8th 35% above peers
Normal, IL 18.5% 24th -3.6pp 9th 40% above peers
West Sacramento, CA 12.8% 15th -2.3pp 10th 3% below peers
Texas City, TX 15.9% 19th -2.6pp 11th 21% above peers
Arcadia, CA 8.5% 6th -1.2pp 12th 35% below peers
Manhattan, KS 20.6% 29th -2.9pp 13th 56% above peers
Peabody, MA 7.5% 5th -1.0pp 14th 43% below peers
Anderson, IN 20.1% 27th -2.6pp 15th 52% above peers
Yucaipa, CA 9.1% 8th -1.1pp 16th 31% below peers
Colton, CA 13.6% 17th -1.4pp 17th 3% above peers
Pinellas Park, FL 12.7% 14th -0.9pp 18th 4% below peers
Winter Haven, FL 16.1% 21st -1.1pp 19th 22% above peers
Kentwood, MI 10.3% 10th -0.6pp 20th 22% below peers
San Jacinto, CA 16.1% 20th -0.9pp 21st 22% above peers
Mount Prospect, IL 6.5% 4th -0.2pp 22nd 50% below peers
Wheaton, IL 5.2% 3rd +0.1pp 23rd 61% below peers
Rocky Mount, NC 19.3% 25th +0.5pp 24th 46% above peers
Galveston, TX 20.1% 26th +1.6pp 25th 52% above peers
West Haven, CT 13.2% 16th +2.1pp 26th on par with peers
Chicopee, MA 17.1% 22nd +3.4pp 27th 29% above peers
Hacienda Heights, CA 11.3% 12th +2.8pp 28th 14% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA 10.0% 9th +3.9pp 29th 24% below peers
Little Elm, TX 9.0% 7th +4.0pp 30th 32% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 11 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of people below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
6 of 11 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Apex, NC down 2.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Eagle Mountain, UT down 3.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Westfield, IN down 2.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.6pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Share of children below the poverty level

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Child poverty changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (10.1% then, 9.1% now; margin ±3.7pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 15 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: child poverty fell 15.1 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (24.1% to 9.1%).
9.1%
20132024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 15.0% -3.1pp
United States ref 16.1%
Westfield, IN 2.2% 1st -6.7pp 1st 87% below peers
Peabody, MA 6.2% 4th -6.7pp 2nd 63% below peers
Normal, IL 7.4% 6th -5.5pp 3rd 55% below peers
Pensacola, FL 17.9% 18th -10.5pp 4th 7% above peers
West Sacramento, CA 14.5% 12th -8.1pp 5th 13% below peers
Texas City, TX 20.8% 20th -10.6pp 6th 25% above peers
Tinley Park, IL 6.5% 5th -3.2pp 7th 61% below peers
Logan, UT 22.2% 22nd -7.1pp 8th 33% above peers
Arcadia, CA 9.4% 8th -2.8pp 9th 44% below peers
Twin Falls, ID 15.0% 13th -4.1pp 10th 10% below peers
Mount Prospect, IL 6.1% 3rd -1.6pp 11th 64% below peers
Plainfield, NJ 22.8% 23rd -6.0pp 12th 36% above peers
Valdosta, GA 33.4% 29th -8.9pp 13th 100% above peers
Pinellas Park, FL 13.3% 10th -2.8pp 14th 20% below peers
Anderson, IN 31.2% 27th -5.2pp 15th 87% above peers
Yucaipa, CA 9.1% 7th -1.1pp 16th 46% below peers
Winter Haven, FL 23.3% 24th -1.7pp 17th 40% above peers
Colton, CA 20.7% 19th -1.0pp 18th 24% above peers
Elkhart, IN 31.0% 26th -1.4pp 19th 86% above peers
West Haven, CT 16.7% 16th -0.3pp 20th on par with peers
San Jacinto, CA 21.6% 21st +0.2pp 21st 29% above peers
Chicopee, MA 24.2% 25th +2.3pp 22nd 45% above peers
Kentwood, MI 16.2% 15th +1.6pp 23rd 3% below peers
Wheaton, IL 5.0% 2nd +0.5pp 24th 70% below peers
Rocky Mount, NC 33.3% 28th +4.2pp 25th 100% above peers
Manhattan, KS 16.8% 17th +2.3pp 26th 1% above peers
Galveston, TX 35.7% 30th +9.2pp 27th 114% above peers
Hacienda Heights, CA 15.5% 14th +5.2pp 28th 7% below peers
Little Elm, TX 11.4% 9th +5.6pp 29th 31% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA 13.6% 11th +7.2pp 30th 19% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 11 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyShare of children below the poverty level
Loading tract map…
6 of 11 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Westfield, IN down 6.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Catalina Foothills, AZ down 5.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Apex, NC down 4.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±2.5pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Households with a broadband internet subscription

▲ Higher is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Broadband rose 7.8 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 84.7% to 92.4% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.0pp). 28 of the 29 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started mid-pack and has reached a genuinely better level; worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 28 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: broadband rose 11.9 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (80.6% to 92.4%).
92.4%
20172024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 93.6% +6.6pp
United States ref 91.1%
Plainfield, NJ 95.0% 7th +24.2pp 1st 3% above peers
Winter Haven, FL 89.2% 24th +21.9pp 2nd 3% below peers
Valdosta, GA 81.0% 29th +19.7pp 3rd 12% below peers
Elkhart, IN 90.2% 21st +12.5pp 4th 2% below peers
Anderson, IN 87.8% 26th +11.9pp 5th 5% below peers
Texas City, TX 91.7% 16th +11.9pp 6th on par with peers
Pensacola, FL 92.5% 13th +9.7pp 7th on par with peers
San Jacinto, CA 92.8% 12th +9.7pp 8th 1% above peers
Rocky Mount, NC 80.7% 30th +8.3pp 9th 12% below peers
Galveston, TX 91.5% 17th +9.4pp 10th 1% below peers
Peabody, MA 91.4% 18th +9.2pp 11th 1% below peers
Normal, IL 86.8% 28th +8.1pp 12th 6% below peers
Mount Prospect, IL 94.0% 9th +8.5pp 13th 2% above peers
Colton, CA 90.8% 20th +8.2pp 14th 1% below peers
Yucaipa, CA 92.4% 14th +7.8pp 15th on par with peers
Logan, UT 89.7% 23rd +7.2pp 16th 3% below peers
Chicopee, MA 88.4% 25th +6.5pp 17th 4% below peers
West Sacramento, CA 94.6% 8th +6.8pp 18th 3% above peers
West Haven, CT 93.3% 11th +6.7pp 19th 1% above peers
Twin Falls, ID 90.0% 22nd +6.2pp 20th 2% below peers
Pinellas Park, FL 87.7% 27th +5.1pp 21st 5% below peers
Arcadia, CA 96.7% 3rd +5.5pp 22nd 5% above peers
Kentwood, MI 91.2% 19th +4.3pp 23rd 1% below peers
Manhattan, KS 92.1% 15th +4.2pp 24th on par with peers
Hacienda Heights, CA 95.2% 6th +4.0pp 25th 3% above peers
Wheaton, IL 95.8% 5th +3.4pp 26th 4% above peers
Tinley Park, IL 93.7% 10th +3.0pp 27th 2% above peers
Westfield, IN 97.3% 2nd +2.7pp 28th 6% above peers
Little Elm, TX 98.3% 1st +2.7pp 29th 7% above peers
Diamond Bar, CA 96.1% 4th +2.1pp 30th 4% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 11 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds with a broadband internet subscription
Loading tract map…
6 of 11 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Olympia, WA up 11.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 85% of this group · 2019-2024
  • The Hammocks, FL up 11.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 82% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Redding, CA up 11.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 81% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±0.8pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Income inequality (Gini index)

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Inequality changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (0.44 then, 0.44 now; margin ±0.03).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 4 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: inequality rose about 2% from 2014 to 2024 (0.43 to 0.44).
0.44
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 0.49 +0.000
United States ref 0.48 +0.001
Plainfield, NJ 0.41 7th -0.070 1st 8% below peers
Valdosta, GA 0.51 29th -0.050 2nd 15% above peers
San Jacinto, CA 0.40 3rd -0.026 3rd 11% below peers
Logan, UT 0.41 6th -0.025 4th 8% below peers
Texas City, TX 0.45 18th -0.023 5th 1% above peers
Pensacola, FL 0.49 27th -0.020 6th 10% above peers
West Sacramento, CA 0.44 14th -0.018 7th 1% below peers
Rocky Mount, NC 0.47 25th -0.015 8th 5% above peers
Hacienda Heights, CA 0.42 9th -0.013 9th 5% below peers
Winter Haven, FL 0.46 22nd -0.014 10th 3% above peers
Mount Prospect, IL 0.43 12th -0.010 11th 3% below peers
Colton, CA 0.39 2nd -0.007 12th 12% below peers
Twin Falls, ID 0.43 10th -0.002 13th 4% below peers
Kentwood, MI 0.41 4th -0.002 14th 9% below peers
Peabody, MA 0.44 17th +0.000 15th on par with peers
Wheaton, IL 0.46 24th +0.003 16th 3% above peers
Anderson, IN 0.46 20th +0.003 17th 3% above peers
Arcadia, CA 0.49 26th +0.007 18th 9% above peers
Pinellas Park, FL 0.44 13th +0.008 19th 2% below peers
Yucaipa, CA 0.44 16th +0.008 20th on par with peers
Manhattan, KS 0.49 28th +0.015 21st 11% above peers
Galveston, TX 0.52 31st +0.017 22nd 18% above peers
West Haven, CT 0.44 15th +0.019 23rd on par with peers
Little Elm, TX 0.37 1st +0.018 24th 17% below peers
Tinley Park, IL 0.41 5th +0.020 25th 8% below peers
Normal, IL 0.51 30th +0.029 26th 16% above peers
Chicopee, MA 0.46 21st +0.028 27th 3% above peers
Diamond Bar, CA 0.45 19th +0.030 28th 2% above peers
Elkhart, IN 0.46 23rd +0.031 29th 3% above peers
Westfield, IN 0.43 11th +0.032 30th 3% below peers
Methuen, MA 0.42 8th 6% below peers
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B19083) through 2024 ±0.02 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Economy

Households receiving SNAP

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

SNAP changed less than the survey can measure between the 2014-2018 and 2019-2023 surveys (9.3% then, 11.9% now; margin ±2.6pp).

Within the survey margin, 2014-2018 vs 2019-2023 surveys; 10 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: snap rose 1.5 percentage points from 2013 to 2023 (10.3% to 11.9%).
11.9%
20102023
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2019-2023 survey Today's rank Change2014-2018 → 2019-2023 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 11.4% +2.2pp
United States ref 11.8% -0.5pp
Logan, UT 5.6% 4th -5.6pp 1st 55% below peers
Westfield, IN 2.4% 1st -1.1pp 2nd 81% below peers
Wheaton, IL 3.6% 2nd -1.7pp 3rd 71% below peers
Elkhart, IN 12.8% 17th -5.8pp 4th 1% above peers
Pensacola, FL 11.4% 14th -4.0pp 5th 10% below peers
Plainfield, NJ 13.4% 19th -3.8pp 6th 6% above peers
Galveston, TX 13.0% 18th -2.3pp 7th 3% above peers
Colton, CA 14.9% 22nd -2.5pp 8th 18% above peers
Texas City, TX 17.6% 25th -2.9pp 9th 39% above peers
Peabody, MA 10.3% 12th -1.6pp 10th 18% below peers
Normal, IL 7.3% 10th -0.9pp 11th 42% below peers
Pinellas Park, FL 13.4% 20th -1.6pp 12th 6% above peers
Kentwood, MI 10.6% 13th -0.9pp 13th 16% below peers
Mount Prospect, IL 7.1% 9th -0.4pp 14th 44% below peers
Winter Haven, FL 16.6% 23rd -0.8pp 15th 32% above peers
Anderson, IN 20.7% 27th -0.9pp 16th 64% above peers
West Haven, CT 17.5% 24th +0.0pp 17th 39% above peers
Valdosta, GA 23.8% 28th +0.1pp 18th 89% above peers
Rocky Mount, NC 25.4% 30th +0.2pp 19th 101% above peers
Twin Falls, ID 12.6% 16th +0.6pp 20th on par with peers
San Jacinto, CA 19.8% 26th +2.6pp 21st 57% above peers
Little Elm, TX 5.1% 3rd +0.7pp 22nd 59% below peers
Chicopee, MA 25.0% 29th +3.5pp 23rd 98% above peers
West Sacramento, CA 14.8% 21st +2.5pp 24th 17% above peers
Manhattan, KS 7.7% 11th +1.6pp 25th 39% below peers
Yucaipa, CA 11.9% 15th +2.6pp 26th 6% below peers
Tinley Park, IL 6.8% 8th +1.6pp 27th 46% below peers
Hacienda Heights, CA 6.7% 7th +2.9pp 28th 47% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA 6.2% 6th +3.4pp 29th 51% below peers
Arcadia, CA 5.8% 5th +4.2pp 30th 54% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 11 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2018 to 2023, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EconomyHouseholds receiving SNAP
Loading tract map…
6 of 11 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Layton, UT down 4.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2018-2023
  • Logan, UT down 5.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2018-2023
  • Springdale, AR down 5.2pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2018-2023
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2023 ±2.2pp at 90% confidence (2023 estimate) survey trend: 2014-2018 vs 2019-2023 surveys about this metric
See all Economy data →
Housing
Housing

Typical home value

No better direction Rising recently
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Home value rose about 1% over the 12 months ending June 2026, slower than 52% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: home value rose about 3% a year from 2021 to 2026, slower than 62% of similar-size cities.
Longer view: home value rose about 9% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: $574,974 in June 2026, up from $567,359 a year earlier.
$574,974
2000June 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref $775,549 (Jun 26) -0.4%
United States ref $372,995 (Jun 26) +0.8%
West Haven, CT $371,947 (Jun 26) 16th +7.2% 1st 1% below peers
Mount Prospect, IL $458,867 (Jun 26) 12th +6.8% 2nd 23% above peers
Elkhart, IN $231,940 (Jun 26) 26th +5.8% 3rd 38% below peers
Wheaton, IL $524,542 (Jun 26) 8th +5.2% 4th 40% above peers
Manhattan, KS $299,405 (Jun 26) 22nd +4.8% 5th 20% below peers
Tinley Park, IL $339,012 (Jun 26) 18th +4.6% 6th 9% below peers
Kentwood, MI $340,017 (Jun 26) 17th +3.9% 7th 9% below peers
Anderson, IN $138,938 (Jun 26) 30th +3.8% 8th 63% below peers
Valdosta, GA $215,219 (Jun 26) 28th +3.5% 9th 43% below peers
Twin Falls, ID $374,440 (Jun 26) 15th +3.0% 10th on par with peers
Westfield, IN $478,818 (Jun 26) 11th +2.8% 11th 28% above peers
Chicopee, MA $325,528 (Jun 26) 19th +2.8% 12th 13% below peers
Logan, UT $397,840 (Jun 26) 14th +2.1% 13th 6% above peers
Arcadia, CA $1,414,461 (Jun 26) 1st +2.0% 14th 278% above peers
Hacienda Heights, CA $960,936 (Jun 26) 3rd +1.9% 15th 157% above peers
Yucaipa, CA $574,974 (Jun 26) 5th +1.3% 16th 54% above peers
Pensacola, FL $268,527 (Jun 26) 25th +1.1% 17th 28% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA $1,029,682 (Jun 26) 2nd +0.9% 18th 175% above peers
Peabody, MA $710,734 (Jun 26) 4th +0.6% 19th 90% above peers
Plainfield, NJ $526,197 (Jun 26) 7th +0.1% 20th 41% above peers
Colton, CA $499,865 (Jun 26) 9th +0.0% 21st 33% above peers
San Jacinto, CA $484,772 (Jun 26) 10th +0.0% 22nd 29% above peers
Normal, IL $269,011 (Jun 26) 24th -0.3% 23rd 28% below peers
Rocky Mount, NC $189,756 (Jun 26) 29th -0.6% 24th 49% below peers
Texas City, TX $229,210 (Jun 26) 27th -2.6% 25th 39% below peers
West Sacramento, CA $532,493 (Jun 26) 6th -2.9% 26th 42% above peers
Winter Haven, FL $275,573 (Jun 26) 23rd -3.2% 27th 26% below peers
Pinellas Park, FL $303,946 (Jun 26) 21st -3.8% 28th 19% below peers
Galveston, TX $322,876 (Jun 26) 20th -6.5% 29th 14% below peers
Little Elm, TX $402,876 (Jun 26) 13th -6.8% 30th 8% above peers
Zillow Home Value Index through 2026-06 modeled trend: robust fit about this metric
Housing

Starter home value (bottom tier)

No better direction Rising recently
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Starter homes rose about 3% over the 12 months ending June 2026, faster than 59% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: starter homes rose about 4% a year from 2021 to 2026, slower than 66% of similar-size cities.
Longer view: starter homes rose about 13% a year from 2016 to 2026.
Most recent monthly reading: $464,615 in June 2026, up from $452,887 a year earlier.
$464,615
2000June 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref $474,537 (Jun 26) -0.7%
United States ref $202,486 (Jun 26) +2.0%
West Haven, CT $277,023 (Jun 26) 16th +7.0% 1st 5% below peers
Manhattan, KS $212,920 (Jun 26) 21st +6.7% 2nd 27% below peers
Mount Prospect, IL $303,664 (Jun 26) 14th +6.4% 3rd 4% above peers
Wheaton, IL $347,090 (Jun 26) 11th +5.7% 4th 19% above peers
Elkhart, IN $155,976 (Jun 26) 26th +5.4% 5th 46% below peers
Anderson, IN $84,872 (Jun 26) 30th +5.1% 6th 71% below peers
Tinley Park, IL $252,853 (Jun 26) 19th +4.1% 7th 13% below peers
Twin Falls, ID $290,945 (Jun 26) 15th +4.1% 8th on par with peers
Kentwood, MI $260,325 (Jun 26) 18th +3.9% 9th 11% below peers
Normal, IL $202,576 (Jun 26) 23rd +3.5% 10th 30% below peers
Chicopee, MA $271,583 (Jun 26) 17th +3.1% 11th 7% below peers
Westfield, IN $351,099 (Jun 26) 10th +2.8% 12th 21% above peers
Yucaipa, CA $464,615 (Jun 26) 5th +2.6% 13th 60% above peers
Plainfield, NJ $447,089 (Jun 26) 6th +2.5% 14th 54% above peers
Valdosta, GA $114,056 (Jun 26) 28th +2.5% 15th 61% below peers
Pensacola, FL $170,760 (Jun 26) 25th +2.1% 16th 41% below peers
Hacienda Heights, CA $733,530 (Jun 26) 2nd +1.9% 17th 152% above peers
Colton, CA $410,588 (Jun 26) 8th +1.2% 18th 41% above peers
Arcadia, CA $952,894 (Jun 26) 1st +1.1% 19th 228% above peers
Peabody, MA $566,776 (Jun 26) 4th +0.6% 20th 95% above peers
Logan, UT $310,297 (Jun 26) 13th +0.1% 21st 7% above peers
Diamond Bar, CA $719,346 (Jun 26) 3rd -0.3% 22nd 147% above peers
San Jacinto, CA $397,012 (Jun 26) 9th -0.4% 23rd 36% above peers
West Sacramento, CA $415,033 (Jun 26) 7th -1.3% 24th 43% above peers
Texas City, TX $155,330 (Jun 26) 27th -2.8% 25th 47% below peers
Rocky Mount, NC $96,667 (Jun 26) 29th -3.3% 26th 67% below peers
Winter Haven, FL $195,352 (Jun 26) 24th -4.1% 27th 33% below peers
Pinellas Park, FL $215,851 (Jun 26) 20th -4.7% 28th 26% below peers
Little Elm, TX $328,392 (Jun 26) 12th -6.9% 29th 13% above peers
Galveston, TX $202,732 (Jun 26) 22nd -7.0% 30th 30% below peers
Zillow Home Value Index through 2026-06 modeled trend: robust fit about this metric
Housing

Homeownership rate

▲ Higher is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Homeownership changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (72.6% then, 73.4% now; margin ±4.0pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 9 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: homeownership rose 1.8 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (71.6% to 73.4%).
73.4%
20112024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 55.9% +1.0pp
United States ref 65.2%
San Jacinto, CA 75.0% 5th +10.6pp 1st 22% above peers
Manhattan, KS 43.5% 28th +4.5pp 2nd 29% below peers
Valdosta, GA 41.7% 29th +4.1pp 3rd 32% below peers
Pensacola, FL 64.2% 12th +4.6pp 4th 5% above peers
Winter Haven, FL 63.7% 14th +4.3pp 5th 4% above peers
West Sacramento, CA 60.2% 16th +3.4pp 6th 2% below peers
Kentwood, MI 61.4% 15th +3.2pp 7th on par with peers
Galveston, TX 46.2% 26th +2.4pp 8th 25% below peers
Elkhart, IN 53.2% 22nd +2.5pp 9th 13% below peers
Tinley Park, IL 86.9% 1st +2.5pp 10th 42% above peers
Colton, CA 52.8% 23rd +1.1pp 11th 14% below peers
Twin Falls, ID 64.1% 13th +1.2pp 12th 4% above peers
Diamond Bar, CA 77.3% 3rd +1.3pp 13th 26% above peers
Pinellas Park, FL 69.0% 9th +1.0pp 14th 12% above peers
Plainfield, NJ 44.8% 27th +0.6pp 15th 27% below peers
Yucaipa, CA 73.4% 6th +0.8pp 16th 20% above peers
Texas City, TX 56.5% 18th +0.4pp 17th 8% below peers
Hacienda Heights, CA 75.5% 4th +0.3pp 18th 23% above peers
Peabody, MA 65.6% 11th -0.2pp 19th 7% above peers
Mount Prospect, IL 68.7% 10th -0.7pp 20th 12% above peers
Normal, IL 54.8% 21st -0.6pp 21st 11% below peers
Wheaton, IL 71.7% 7th -1.6pp 22nd 17% above peers
Westfield, IN 79.5% 2nd -1.8pp 23rd 30% above peers
Arcadia, CA 58.1% 17th -1.3pp 24th 5% below peers
Anderson, IN 55.5% 20th -1.4pp 25th 10% below peers
Rocky Mount, NC 49.0% 25th -1.6pp 26th 20% below peers
Chicopee, MA 55.7% 19th -2.9pp 27th 9% below peers
Logan, UT 37.2% 30th -2.1pp 28th 39% below peers
West Haven, CT 50.6% 24th -4.1pp 29th 18% below peers
Little Elm, TX 70.1% 8th -6.4pp 30th 14% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 11 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHomeownership rate
Loading tract map…
6 of 11 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±3.2pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Housing

Typical asking rent

No better direction Rising recently, slower than peers
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Rent rose about 1% over the 12 months ending June 2026, slower than 78% of similar-size cities.

Multi-year view: rent rose about 4% a year from 2022 to 2026, slower than 65% of similar-size cities.
Most recent monthly reading: $2,095 in June 2026, up from $2,073 a year earlier.
$2,095
2022June 2026
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Place Latest Today's rank Changelast 12 months Change rank History Latest vs. peers
United States ref $1,965 (Jun 26) +2.2%
Kentwood, MI $1,620 (Jun 26) 20th +6.3% 1st 16% below peers
Elkhart, IN $1,174 (Jun 26) 29th +6.2% 2nd 39% below peers
Logan, UT $1,406 (Jun 26) 22nd +5.5% 3rd 27% below peers
Anderson, IN $1,054 (Jun 26) 30th +5.3% 4th 45% below peers
Tinley Park, IL $2,269 (Jun 26) 7th +5.1% 5th 18% above peers
Manhattan, KS $1,293 (Jun 26) 28th +5.1% 6th 33% below peers
Hacienda Heights, CA $3,254 (Jun 26) 3rd +4.8% 7th 69% above peers
Colton, CA $1,929 (Jun 26) 15th +4.4% 8th on par with peers
Galveston, TX $1,356 (Jun 26) 24th +4.4% 9th 30% below peers
Texas City, TX $1,342 (Jun 26) 26th +3.5% 10th 30% below peers
Arcadia, CA $3,325 (Jun 26) 1st +3.0% 11th 72% above peers
Pensacola, FL $1,657 (Jun 26) 18th +2.9% 12th 14% below peers
Twin Falls, ID $1,575 (Jun 26) 21st +2.8% 13th 18% below peers
Westfield, IN $1,986 (Jun 26) 14th +2.5% 14th 3% above peers
Winter Haven, FL $1,756 (Jun 26) 16th +2.5% 15th 9% below peers
West Sacramento, CA $2,228 (Jun 26) 8th +2.1% 16th 16% above peers
Normal, IL $1,403 (Jun 26) 23rd +2.0% 17th 27% below peers
Valdosta, GA $1,345 (Jun 26) 25th +1.9% 18th 30% below peers
West Haven, CT $2,005 (Jun 26) 13th +1.9% 19th 4% above peers
San Jacinto, CA $2,793 (Jun 26) 5th +1.7% 20th 45% above peers
Peabody, MA $2,812 (Jun 26) 4th +1.4% 21st 46% above peers
Yucaipa, CA $2,095 (Jun 26) 12th +1.1% 22nd 9% above peers
Diamond Bar, CA $3,301 (Jun 26) 2nd +1.0% 23rd 71% above peers
Wheaton, IL $2,169 (Jun 26) 10th +0.9% 24th 12% above peers
Little Elm, TX $2,282 (Jun 26) 6th +0.3% 25th 18% above peers
Mount Prospect, IL $1,718 (Jun 26) 17th -0.1% 26th 11% below peers
Rocky Mount, NC $1,300 (Jun 26) 27th -1.6% 27th 33% below peers
Pinellas Park, FL $2,101 (Jun 26) 11th -2.0% 28th 9% above peers
Plainfield, NJ 9th 13% above peers
Chicopee, MA 19th 15% below peers
Zillow Observed Rent Index through 2026-06 modeled trend: robust fit about this metric
Housing

Housing cost-burdened households

▼ Lower is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Cost burden rose 6.8 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 29.6% to 36.4% - more than the combined survey margin (±4.6pp). That reverses the previous span, which went down between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys. 3 of the 29 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 5 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: cost burden fell 5.5 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (41.9% to 36.4%).
36.4%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 41.7% +0.0pp
United States ref 32.2% +0.4pp
Rocky Mount, NC 32.0% 7th -6.2pp 1st 12% below peers
Tinley Park, IL 26.2% 2nd -4.4pp 2nd 28% below peers
Plainfield, NJ 46.6% 31st -4.6pp 3rd 28% above peers
Hacienda Heights, CA 34.7% 14th -3.1pp 4th 5% below peers
Anderson, IN 32.8% 8th -2.6pp 5th 10% below peers
Manhattan, KS 36.7% 17th -2.3pp 6th 1% above peers
San Jacinto, CA 41.1% 26th -2.1pp 7th 13% above peers
Pensacola, FL 33.1% 11th -1.6pp 8th 9% below peers
Valdosta, GA 40.5% 23rd -1.2pp 9th 11% above peers
West Haven, CT 40.9% 25th -1.1pp 10th 12% above peers
Mount Prospect, IL 31.9% 6th -0.6pp 11th 12% below peers
Kentwood, MI 28.6% 4th -0.2pp 12th 22% below peers
Colton, CA 43.9% 29th +0.1pp 13th 20% above peers
Elkhart, IN 33.5% 13th +0.1pp 14th 8% below peers
Logan, UT 38.6% 21st +0.5pp 15th 6% above peers
West Sacramento, CA 37.7% 18th +1.0pp 16th 4% above peers
Wheaton, IL 28.5% 3rd +1.0pp 17th 22% below peers
Little Elm, TX 31.8% 5th +1.4pp 18th 13% below peers
Peabody, MA 38.1% 20th +2.0pp 19th 5% above peers
Westfield, IN 24.4% 1st +1.2pp 20th 33% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA 40.8% 24th +2.7pp 21st 12% above peers
Pinellas Park, FL 36.0% 15th +2.6pp 22nd 1% below peers
Arcadia, CA 45.8% 30th +4.3pp 23rd 26% above peers
Normal, IL 33.0% 10th +3.1pp 24th 9% below peers
Twin Falls, ID 32.9% 9th +3.3pp 25th 10% below peers
Galveston, TX 43.7% 28th +4.6pp 26th 20% above peers
Texas City, TX 38.0% 19th +4.8pp 27th 4% above peers
Chicopee, MA 40.3% 22nd +6.9pp 28th 11% above peers
Yucaipa, CA 36.4% 16th +6.8pp 29th on par with peers
Winter Haven, FL 42.5% 27th +8.6pp 30th 17% above peers
Methuen, MA 33.3% 12th 9% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 11 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHousing cost-burdened households
Loading tract map…
6 of 11 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Tinley Park, IL down 4.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 97% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Appleton, WI down 3.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 96% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Decatur, IL down 3.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 93% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (tables B25070 + B25091) through 2024 ±3.4pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Housing

Households without a vehicle

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

No vehicle changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (5.5% then, 6.4% now; margin ±2.1pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 10 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: no vehicle rose 2.0 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (4.5% to 6.4%).
6.4%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 7.1% -0.0pp
United States ref 8.3% -0.3pp
San Jacinto, CA 3.5% 5th -3.4pp 1st 46% below peers
Manhattan, KS 4.3% 8th -4.1pp 2nd 33% below peers
Plainfield, NJ 12.7% 31st -8.3pp 3rd 98% above peers
Elkhart, IN 8.1% 22nd -3.7pp 4th 26% above peers
Peabody, MA 8.5% 24th -3.6pp 5th 33% above peers
Logan, UT 4.1% 7th -1.7pp 6th 36% below peers
Valdosta, GA 9.5% 26th -3.3pp 7th 48% above peers
Westfield, IN 1.9% 1st -0.7pp 8th 70% below peers
Anderson, IN 9.0% 25th -2.8pp 9th 40% above peers
Little Elm, TX 2.3% 2nd -0.6pp 10th 64% below peers
Twin Falls, ID 3.7% 6th -0.8pp 11th 43% below peers
Tinley Park, IL 3.2% 4th -0.6pp 12th 50% below peers
West Haven, CT 10.8% 29th -1.8pp 13th 69% above peers
Chicopee, MA 10.0% 27th -1.4pp 14th 56% above peers
Winter Haven, FL 8.0% 21st -0.9pp 15th 25% above peers
Diamond Bar, CA 2.4% 3rd -0.2pp 16th 63% below peers
Galveston, TX 10.7% 28th -0.6pp 17th 66% above peers
Normal, IL 6.0% 15th -0.3pp 18th 6% below peers
West Sacramento, CA 7.7% 20th -0.2pp 19th 21% above peers
Pensacola, FL 8.4% 23rd +0.2pp 20th 30% above peers
Pinellas Park, FL 7.5% 18th +0.3pp 21st 17% above peers
Texas City, TX 7.0% 17th +0.3pp 22nd 9% above peers
Rocky Mount, NC 12.0% 30th +0.7pp 23rd 86% above peers
Yucaipa, CA 6.4% 16th +0.9pp 24th on par with peers
Kentwood, MI 7.6% 19th +1.1pp 25th 18% above peers
Mount Prospect, IL 5.9% 13th +1.5pp 26th 9% below peers
Arcadia, CA 5.0% 10th +1.3pp 27th 23% below peers
Wheaton, IL 5.4% 11th +1.6pp 28th 16% below peers
Colton, CA 5.6% 12th +1.8pp 29th 12% below peers
Hacienda Heights, CA 4.6% 9th +1.6pp 30th 28% below peers
Methuen, MA 6.0% 14th 7% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 11 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HousingHouseholds without a vehicle
Loading tract map…
6 of 11 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • San Jacinto, CA down 3.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Idaho Falls, ID down 2.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Encinitas, CA down 2.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B08201) through 2024 ±1.6pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Housing data →
Health
Health

People without health insurance

▼ Lower is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Uninsured changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (5.5% then, 5.7% now; margin ±1.4pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 10 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: uninsured fell 8.7 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (14.4% to 5.7%).
5.7%
20122024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 6.5% -0.9pp
United States ref 8.2% -0.4pp
Diamond Bar, CA 3.4% 5th -2.4pp 1st 58% below peers
Wheaton, IL 2.2% 1st -1.3pp 2nd 73% below peers
Kentwood, MI 3.9% 8th -2.1pp 3rd 53% below peers
Twin Falls, ID 8.8% 17th -3.9pp 4th 8% above peers
Hacienda Heights, CA 4.7% 9th -1.8pp 5th 42% below peers
Westfield, IN 4.8% 10th -1.7pp 6th 41% below peers
Arcadia, CA 3.5% 6th -1.1pp 7th 57% below peers
San Jacinto, CA 8.1% 16th -2.0pp 8th on par with peers
Elkhart, IN 11.8% 26th -1.9pp 9th 46% above peers
Anderson, IN 9.0% 18th -1.2pp 10th 11% above peers
Texas City, TX 16.4% 30th -2.2pp 11th 101% above peers
Little Elm, TX 11.6% 24th -1.5pp 12th 43% above peers
Galveston, TX 15.9% 28th -1.9pp 13th 95% above peers
Winter Haven, FL 12.2% 27th -1.0pp 14th 50% above peers
Tinley Park, IL 3.7% 7th -0.3pp 15th 54% below peers
Peabody, MA 2.4% 2nd -0.1pp 16th 70% below peers
Valdosta, GA 16.1% 29th -0.3pp 17th 98% above peers
Yucaipa, CA 5.7% 13th +0.1pp 18th 30% below peers
West Haven, CT 7.8% 15th +0.4pp 19th 4% below peers
Pensacola, FL 11.0% 22nd +0.8pp 20th 36% above peers
Chicopee, MA 3.4% 4th +0.3pp 21st 59% below peers
Plainfield, NJ 27.8% 31st +2.3pp 22nd 242% above peers
Pinellas Park, FL 11.8% 25th +1.0pp 23rd 45% above peers
Colton, CA 9.1% 19th +1.0pp 24th 11% above peers
Logan, UT 9.3% 21st +1.1pp 25th 14% above peers
Mount Prospect, IL 9.1% 20th +1.4pp 26th 12% above peers
Normal, IL 4.8% 11th +0.9pp 27th 41% below peers
West Sacramento, CA 5.5% 12th +1.1pp 28th 32% below peers
Rocky Mount, NC 11.2% 23rd +2.2pp 29th 38% above peers
Manhattan, KS 7.5% 14th +2.0pp 30th 8% below peers
Methuen, MA 3.3% 3rd 59% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 11 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthPeople without health insurance
Loading tract map…
6 of 11 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Race · Age · Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Mountain View, CA down 2.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Brookline, MA down 1.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Minnetonka, MN down 1.1pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±1.1pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Health

Adult obesity

▼ Lower is better Level only
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Adult obesity is roughly in line with the peer median.

33.1%
20202022
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 30 similar-size cities best first
Place Latest Today's rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 28.4%
United States ref 33.4%
Arcadia, CA 16.3% 1st 52% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA 17.6% 2nd 49% below peers
Hacienda Heights, CA 21.8% 3rd 36% below peers
Mount Prospect, IL 28.2% 4th 18% below peers
West Sacramento, CA 29.0% 5th 15% below peers
Wheaton, IL 29.0% 6th 15% below peers
Westfield, IN 29.3% 7th 15% below peers
Peabody, MA 29.9% 8th 13% below peers
Tinley Park, IL 30.5% 9th 11% below peers
Pensacola, FL 31.7% 10th 8% below peers
Pinellas Park, FL 31.8% 11th 7% below peers
Little Elm, TX 32.3% 12th 6% below peers
Yucaipa, CA 33.1% 13th 3% below peers
Manhattan, KS 33.5% 14th 2% below peers
Kentwood, MI 34.3% 15th on par with peers
West Haven, CT 34.3% 16th on par with peers
Chicopee, MA 34.9% 17th 2% above peers
Plainfield, NJ 35.0% 18th 2% above peers
Normal, IL 36.0% 19th 5% above peers
Logan, UT 36.4% 20th 6% above peers
Twin Falls, ID 37.3% 21st 9% above peers
Colton, CA 37.5% 22nd 9% above peers
San Jacinto, CA 37.7% 23rd 10% above peers
Anderson, IN 42.4% 24th 24% above peers
Winter Haven, FL 42.8% 25th 25% above peers
Valdosta, GA 42.9% 26th 25% above peers
Galveston, TX 43.1% 27th 26% above peers
Rocky Mount, NC 44.0% 28th 28% above peers
Texas City, TX 45.3% 29th 32% above peers
Elkhart, IN 45.9% 30th 34% above peers
CDC PLACES through 2022 modeled tract map about this metric
Health

Children without health insurance

▼ Lower is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Child uninsured rose 2.4 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 1.8% to 4.2% - more than the combined survey margin (±2.3pp). That reverses the previous span, which went down between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 surveys. 4 of the 29 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 9 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: child uninsured fell 3.6 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (7.8% to 4.2%).
4.2%
20122024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 3.2% -0.0pp
United States ref 5.5% +0.4pp
Wheaton, IL 0.8% 1st -2.3pp 1st 80% below peers
Kentwood, MI 1.2% 3rd -2.7pp 2nd 72% below peers
Arcadia, CA 0.9% 2nd -1.5pp 3rd 78% below peers
San Jacinto, CA 2.5% 9th -3.9pp 4th 41% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA 2.0% 8th -2.6pp 5th 51% below peers
Hacienda Heights, CA 1.9% 7th -1.3pp 6th 54% below peers
Twin Falls, ID 4.3% 18th -2.2pp 7th 2% above peers
Anderson, IN 4.4% 19th -2.0pp 8th 6% above peers
Normal, IL 1.4% 4th -0.6pp 9th 66% below peers
Westfield, IN 4.2% 17th -1.5pp 10th 2% above peers
Colton, CA 3.6% 15th -1.0pp 11th 13% below peers
Tinley Park, IL 2.8% 11th -0.7pp 12th 34% below peers
Little Elm, TX 10.0% 27th -2.6pp 13th 139% above peers
Winter Haven, FL 7.7% 24th -0.3pp 14th 85% above peers
Plainfield, NJ 13.6% 31st -0.5pp 15th 226% above peers
Texas City, TX 10.7% 28th -0.4pp 16th 156% above peers
Galveston, TX 11.2% 29th -0.1pp 17th 169% above peers
Elkhart, IN 9.7% 26th +0.6pp 18th 131% above peers
West Haven, CT 5.8% 21st +0.4pp 19th 40% above peers
Peabody, MA 1.7% 6th +0.2pp 20th 60% below peers
Logan, UT 7.1% 23rd +1.4pp 21st 71% above peers
Rocky Mount, NC 5.4% 20th +2.1pp 22nd 29% above peers
Valdosta, GA 11.4% 30th +5.1pp 23rd 173% above peers
Manhattan, KS 3.2% 13th +1.4pp 24th 24% below peers
Mount Prospect, IL 3.4% 14th +1.6pp 25th 19% below peers
Pinellas Park, FL 8.7% 25th +4.6pp 26th 108% above peers
Chicopee, MA 3.1% 12th +1.6pp 27th 26% below peers
Pensacola, FL 6.6% 22nd +3.5pp 28th 58% above peers
Yucaipa, CA 4.2% 16th +2.4pp 29th on par with peers
West Sacramento, CA 2.7% 10th +2.6pp 30th 35% below peers
Methuen, MA 1.5% 5th 65% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 11 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
HealthChildren without health insurance
Loading tract map…
6 of 11 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the strongest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Newport Beach, CA down 1.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 100% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Royal Oak, MI down 1.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Troy, NY down 1.7pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 97% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B27001) through 2024 ±1.9pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Health data →
Education
Education

Adults with a bachelor's degree or higher

▲ Higher is better No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

College attainment changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (24.4% then, 26.9% now; margin ±3.4pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 13 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: college attainment rose 7.3 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (19.6% to 26.9%).
26.9%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 37.1% +3.1pp
United States ref 35.7% +3.5pp
Texas City, TX 20.0% 27th +5.0pp 1st 42% below peers
West Haven, CT 30.5% 18th +6.2pp 2nd 12% below peers
Galveston, TX 36.0% 13th +6.8pp 3rd 4% above peers
Twin Falls, ID 24.5% 22nd +4.0pp 4th 29% below peers
Elkhart, IN 17.7% 28th +2.7pp 5th 49% below peers
West Sacramento, CA 34.5% 16th +5.1pp 6th on par with peers
Pinellas Park, FL 25.5% 21st +3.6pp 7th 26% below peers
Pensacola, FL 43.0% 9th +5.8pp 8th 25% above peers
Kentwood, MI 36.7% 12th +4.8pp 9th 6% above peers
Chicopee, MA 22.9% 24th +2.8pp 10th 34% below peers
Rocky Mount, NC 22.9% 23rd +2.6pp 11th 34% below peers
Plainfield, NJ 22.0% 26th +2.5pp 12th 36% below peers
Winter Haven, FL 22.0% 25th +2.4pp 13th 36% below peers
San Jacinto, CA 14.2% 31st +1.5pp 14th 59% below peers
Mount Prospect, IL 48.5% 7th +4.8pp 15th 41% above peers
Yucaipa, CA 26.9% 20th +2.5pp 16th 22% below peers
Valdosta, GA 28.3% 19th +2.6pp 17th 18% below peers
Normal, IL 52.9% 5th +4.5pp 18th 53% above peers
Logan, UT 40.3% 10th +3.4pp 19th 17% above peers
Arcadia, CA 57.4% 3rd +2.6pp 20th 66% above peers
Peabody, MA 35.0% 15th +1.0pp 21st 2% above peers
Hacienda Heights, CA 35.1% 14th +1.0pp 22nd 2% above peers
Manhattan, KS 53.3% 4th +1.4pp 23rd 55% above peers
Little Elm, TX 44.2% 8th +1.1pp 24th 28% above peers
Westfield, IN 59.8% 2nd +1.2pp 25th 73% above peers
Tinley Park, IL 37.0% 11th +0.4pp 26th 7% above peers
Wheaton, IL 64.5% 1st +0.3pp 27th 87% above peers
Anderson, IN 15.7% 30th -0.3pp 28th 55% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA 52.8% 6th -2.1pp 29th 53% above peers
Colton, CA 16.6% 29th -0.8pp 30th 52% below peers
Methuen, MA 31.0% 17th 10% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 11 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationAdults with a bachelor's degree or higher
Loading tract map…
6 of 11 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸ Break down by group Sex · ACS 2024
Loading breakdown…
How breakdowns work →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Apopka, FL up 11.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Troy, NY up 10.5pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Burleson, TX up 7.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 95% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±2.7pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Education

Children ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool

▲ Higher is better Worsening
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Preschool enrollment fell 23.3 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 47.3% to 24.0% - more than the combined survey margin (±13.8pp). 5 of the 29 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. That is movement in the wrong direction.

Worsening beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 7 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: preschool enrollment fell 9.9 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (33.9% to 24.0%).
24.0%
20112024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 30 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 44.5% -5.1pp
United States ref 45.5%
West Haven, CT 79.0% 1st +35.0pp 1st 70% above peers
Texas City, TX 39.8% 20th +16.1pp 2nd 14% below peers
Colton, CA 46.5% 14th +15.4pp 3rd on par with peers
Little Elm, TX 46.4% 15th +15.2pp 4th on par with peers
Kentwood, MI 59.0% 5th +15.1pp 5th 27% above peers
Chicopee, MA 45.8% 16th +10.6pp 6th 1% below peers
Normal, IL 57.0% 7th +11.3pp 7th 23% above peers
Anderson, IN 26.6% 27th +5.2pp 8th 43% below peers
Manhattan, KS 60.8% 4th +11.1pp 9th 31% above peers
Rocky Mount, NC 33.4% 24th +5.2pp 10th 28% below peers
Westfield, IN 65.8% 3rd +9.9pp 11th 42% above peers
Plainfield, NJ 67.7% 2nd +9.3pp 12th 46% above peers
Logan, UT 46.8% 13th +6.4pp 13th 1% above peers
Valdosta, GA 58.0% 6th +7.0pp 14th 25% above peers
Tinley Park, IL 49.4% 10th -1.2pp 15th 6% above peers
Elkhart, IN 25.1% 28th -0.9pp 16th 46% below peers
Hacienda Heights, CA 52.3% 9th -3.3pp 17th 13% above peers
Galveston, TX 43.5% 19th -5.4pp 18th 6% below peers
Twin Falls, ID 35.5% 23rd -5.3pp 19th 23% below peers
Winter Haven, FL 28.1% 26th -4.9pp 20th 39% below peers
Pinellas Park, FL 37.5% 22nd -6.6pp 21st 19% below peers
Pensacola, FL 47.7% 12th -8.5pp 22nd 3% above peers
West Sacramento, CA 38.4% 21st -8.6pp 23rd 17% below peers
Wheaton, IL 54.2% 8th -18.7pp 24th 17% above peers
Arcadia, CA 48.9% 11th -19.3pp 25th 5% above peers
Diamond Bar, CA 45.1% 17th -20.2pp 26th 3% below peers
San Jacinto, CA 24.3% 29th -11.6pp 27th 48% below peers
Peabody, MA 31.9% 25th -15.5pp 28th 31% below peers
Mount Prospect, IL 43.5% 18th -23.6pp 29th 6% below peers
Yucaipa, CA 24.0% 30th -23.3pp 30th 48% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 11 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationChildren ages 3-4 enrolled in preschool
Loading tract map…
6 of 11 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started mid-pack, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • West Haven, CT up 35.0pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Castle Rock, CO up 21.6pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 96% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Cedar Park, TX up 20.8pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 94% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±6.7pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Education

Teens not in school and not working

▼ Lower is better Real improvement
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Disconnected youth fell 6.9 percentage points between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 9.7% to 2.8% - more than the combined survey margin (±6.0pp). None of the 29 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction. It started among the weakest third of similar-size cities, so some rebound is expected; still, the improvement is sustained and worth investigating.

Improving beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 2 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: disconnected youth fell 11.3 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (14.1% to 2.8%).
2.8%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 6.7% +0.2pp
United States ref 6.9% +0.3pp
Yucaipa, CA 2.8% 8th -6.9pp 1st 56% below peers
Valdosta, GA 3.2% 9th -5.3pp 2nd 51% below peers
Rocky Mount, NC 3.5% 10th -4.7pp 3rd 46% below peers
Chicopee, MA 6.9% 19th -4.3pp 4th 7% above peers
Manhattan, KS 1.8% 4th -0.9pp 5th 72% below peers
Kentwood, MI 5.5% 14th -2.2pp 6th 14% below peers
Elkhart, IN 11.1% 26th -3.6pp 7th 72% above peers
Texas City, TX 8.3% 22nd -1.8pp 8th 28% above peers
Pinellas Park, FL 6.5% 17th -1.3pp 9th on par with peers
Mount Prospect, IL 3.5% 11th -0.7pp 10th 45% below peers
Plainfield, NJ 10.3% 25th -0.6pp 11th 59% above peers
Hacienda Heights, CA 7.5% 20th -0.1pp 12th 16% above peers
Peabody, MA 5.3% 13th +0.1pp 13th 17% below peers
Twin Falls, ID 8.7% 23rd +1.5pp 14th 36% above peers
Wheaton, IL 1.3% 2nd +0.2pp 15th 80% below peers
Anderson, IN 6.7% 18th +1.8pp 16th 4% above peers
Galveston, TX 10.2% 24th +3.2pp 17th 58% above peers
Westfield, IN 2.5% 6th +0.9pp 18th 60% below peers
Little Elm, TX 7.5% 21st +2.8pp 19th 17% above peers
San Jacinto, CA 12.3% 29th +4.8pp 20th 91% above peers
Logan, UT 6.4% 16th +2.8pp 21st on par with peers
Winter Haven, FL 17.0% 31st +7.9pp 22nd 164% above peers
Diamond Bar, CA 2.3% 5th +1.1pp 23rd 65% below peers
Arcadia, CA 1.6% 3rd +0.8pp 24th 75% below peers
West Sacramento, CA 13.2% 30th +6.8pp 25th 104% above peers
Tinley Park, IL 2.7% 7th +1.6pp 26th 58% below peers
Colton, CA 11.6% 27th +7.5pp 27th 80% above peers
Pensacola, FL 11.7% 28th +8.7pp 28th 81% above peers
Normal, IL 0.8% 1st +0.6pp 29th 87% below peers
West Haven, CT 4.5% 12th +3.8pp 30th 30% below peers
Methuen, MA 6.3% 15th 3% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 11 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: green tracts improved, red tracts moved the wrong way. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
EducationTeens not in school and not working
Loading tract map…
6 of 11 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
▸

Peers worth a call

3
Cities of similar size (50k-100k) that started in the weakest third, like this city, and whose improvement is sustained over several years, larger than the data's normal noise, and big enough to matter. Referral candidates to investigate, not proven interventions. How we pick these →
  • Miami Beach, FL down 7.9pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • St. Cloud, FL down 12.3pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 99% of this group · 2019-2024
  • Pico Rivera, CA down 22.4pp between its surveys · a larger real gain than 98% of this group · 2019-2024
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B14005) through 2024 ±3.0pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Education data →
Demographics
Demographics

Population

No better direction Rising
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Population rose about 2% between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys, from 53,416 to 54,421 - more than the combined survey margin (±104). 19 of the 29 similar-size cities show a real change in the same direction.

Rising beyond the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 28 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: population rose about 4% from 2014 to 2024 (52,406 to 54,421).
54,421
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
Westfield, IN 54,677 16th +38% 1st on par with peers
Winter Haven, FL 55,200 8th +34% 2nd 1% above peers
Little Elm, TX 54,820 14th +19% 3rd on par with peers
San Jacinto, CA 55,180 9th +15% 4th 1% above peers
Texas City, TX 55,364 3rd +14% 5th 1% above peers
Twin Falls, ID 54,164 22nd +11% 6th 1% below peers
Plainfield, NJ 55,236 7th +10% 7th 1% above peers
Logan, UT 54,907 12th +8% 8th on par with peers
Galveston, TX 53,424 30th +6% 9th 2% below peers
Kentwood, MI 54,296 19th +5% 10th 1% below peers
Peabody, MA 54,695 15th +3% 11th on par with peers
West Sacramento, CA 54,927 11th +3% 12th on par with peers
Elkhart, IN 53,733 25th +3% 13th 2% below peers
Pensacola, FL 54,036 23rd +3% 14th 1% below peers
Yucaipa, CA 54,421 17th +2% 15th on par with peers
Mount Prospect, IL 55,472 1st +2% 16th 1% above peers
Anderson, IN 55,367 2nd +2% 17th 1% above peers
Pinellas Park, FL 53,560 27th +1% 18th 2% below peers
West Haven, CT 55,351 4th +1% 19th 1% above peers
Wheaton, IL 53,557 28th +1% 20th 2% below peers
Chicopee, MA 55,295 5th -0% 21st 1% above peers
Rocky Mount, NC 54,297 18th -0% 22nd 1% below peers
Colton, CA 53,772 24th -1% 23rd 2% below peers
Valdosta, GA 55,252 6th -2% 24th 1% above peers
Hacienda Heights, CA 54,291 20th -2% 25th 1% below peers
Manhattan, KS 54,239 21st -2% 26th 1% below peers
Normal, IL 53,569 26th -2% 27th 2% below peers
Tinley Park, IL 54,842 13th -3% 28th on par with peers
Diamond Bar, CA 53,355 31st -5% 29th 2% below peers
Arcadia, CA 55,170 10th -5% 30th 1% above peers
Methuen, MA 53,475 29th 2% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 11 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsPopulation
Loading tract map…
6 of 11 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±90 at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Children's share of the population

No better direction No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Children changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (24.8% then, 26.2% now; margin ±2.5pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 9 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: children rose 1.0 percentage points from 2017 to 2024 (25.3% to 26.2%).
26.2%
20172024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 21.9% -0.9pp
United States ref 21.6% -0.7pp
Plainfield, NJ 28.9% 1st +2.9pp 1st 33% above peers
Peabody, MA 18.7% 25th +1.6pp 2nd 14% below peers
Yucaipa, CA 26.2% 5th +1.5pp 3rd 21% above peers
West Haven, CT 20.2% 22nd +0.5pp 4th 7% below peers
Anderson, IN 20.9% 19th +0.2pp 5th 4% below peers
Winter Haven, FL 21.4% 17th +0.0pp 6th 1% below peers
Valdosta, GA 22.6% 13th -0.2pp 7th 4% above peers
Mount Prospect, IL 22.9% 11th -0.7pp 8th 5% above peers
West Sacramento, CA 25.3% 7th -0.8pp 9th 16% above peers
Chicopee, MA 19.2% 23rd -0.8pp 10th 12% below peers
Kentwood, MI 23.3% 10th -1.1pp 11th 7% above peers
Elkhart, IN 26.3% 4th -1.3pp 12th 21% above peers
Rocky Mount, NC 22.0% 15th -1.1pp 13th 1% above peers
Manhattan, KS 14.6% 31st -0.8pp 14th 33% below peers
Wheaton, IL 22.0% 14th -1.2pp 15th 1% above peers
Diamond Bar, CA 19.0% 24th -1.1pp 16th 13% below peers
Hacienda Heights, CA 18.1% 27th -1.1pp 17th 17% below peers
Arcadia, CA 20.9% 20th -1.3pp 18th 4% below peers
San Jacinto, CA 27.6% 3rd -1.7pp 19th 27% above peers
Normal, IL 16.1% 29th -1.0pp 20th 26% below peers
Texas City, TX 22.8% 12th -1.6pp 21st 5% above peers
Tinley Park, IL 20.5% 21st -1.8pp 22nd 6% below peers
Twin Falls, ID 25.1% 8th -2.3pp 23rd 15% above peers
Little Elm, TX 28.0% 2nd -2.7pp 24th 29% above peers
Logan, UT 21.7% 16th -2.1pp 25th on par with peers
Pinellas Park, FL 17.1% 28th -1.8pp 26th 22% below peers
Westfield, IN 25.9% 6th -4.0pp 27th 19% above peers
Galveston, TX 14.8% 30th -2.4pp 28th 32% below peers
Colton, CA 23.4% 9th -4.3pp 29th 8% above peers
Pensacola, FL 18.7% 26th -5.6pp 30th 14% below peers
Methuen, MA 21.3% 18th 2% below peers
▸ Where is this changing? 11 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren's share of the population
Loading tract map…
6 of 11 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey through 2024 ±2.2pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Children in single-parent families

No better direction No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Single-parent changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (21.6% then, 24.2% now; margin ±7.8pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 1 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: single-parent fell 3.7 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (27.9% to 24.2%).
24.2%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 28.5% +0.7pp
United States ref 29.9% -0.2pp
Hacienda Heights, CA 24.1% 23rd +6.9pp 1st 24% below peers
Little Elm, TX 29.2% 19th +8.1pp 2nd 9% below peers
Diamond Bar, CA 20.8% 28th +5.0pp 3rd 35% below peers
Twin Falls, ID 31.9% 16th +7.0pp 4th on par with peers
Mount Prospect, IL 20.9% 27th +4.5pp 5th 34% below peers
Chicopee, MA 56.4% 2nd +9.4pp 6th 77% above peers
Elkhart, IN 56.0% 3rd +7.9pp 7th 75% above peers
Arcadia, CA 21.9% 26th +2.5pp 8th 31% below peers
Yucaipa, CA 24.2% 22nd +2.6pp 9th 24% below peers
Plainfield, NJ 55.8% 4th +5.9pp 10th 75% above peers
Rocky Mount, NC 65.4% 1st +6.2pp 11th 105% above peers
San Jacinto, CA 37.1% 12th +3.4pp 12th 16% above peers
West Sacramento, CA 30.2% 18th +2.6pp 13th 5% below peers
Tinley Park, IL 15.8% 29th +0.2pp 14th 51% below peers
Colton, CA 38.4% 10th +0.0pp 15th 20% above peers
Valdosta, GA 52.1% 5th -0.3pp 16th 63% above peers
Galveston, TX 42.9% 8th -0.8pp 17th 34% above peers
West Haven, CT 41.1% 9th -1.0pp 18th 29% above peers
Anderson, IN 48.6% 6th -2.0pp 19th 52% above peers
Logan, UT 24.1% 24th -1.1pp 20th 25% below peers
Peabody, MA 24.4% 21st -1.5pp 21st 24% below peers
Pinellas Park, FL 33.2% 15th -2.1pp 22nd 4% above peers
Texas City, TX 44.9% 7th -3.3pp 23rd 41% above peers
Pensacola, FL 37.6% 11th -4.8pp 24th 18% above peers
Kentwood, MI 31.2% 17th -5.0pp 25th 2% below peers
Wheaton, IL 10.1% 31st -1.8pp 26th 68% below peers
Normal, IL 22.6% 25th -4.2pp 27th 29% below peers
Manhattan, KS 27.6% 20th -6.2pp 28th 14% below peers
Winter Haven, FL 36.0% 13th -8.9pp 29th 13% above peers
Westfield, IN 13.6% 30th -6.2pp 30th 58% below peers
Methuen, MA 33.9% 14th 6% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 11 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsChildren in single-parent families
Loading tract map…
6 of 11 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B09002) through 2024 ±5.7pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
Demographics

Young children with all parents in the labor force

No better direction No measurable change
Compared against How peers are chosen →

Working parents changed less than the survey can measure between the 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 surveys (63.2% then, 57.8% now; margin ±20.2pp).

Within the survey margin, 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys; 10 of 29 similar-size cities show a real change.
Longer view: working parents fell 5.3 percentage points from 2014 to 2024 (63.2% to 57.8%).
57.8%
20102024
Open in Explorer →
▸ Compare all 31 similar-size cities by change rank
Change is measured between each place's two non-overlapping survey periods against its published margins (90% confidence). significant improvement · significant worsening · not significant (within the margin). Change rank orders every measured change; read it with the dot beside it, ranks among hollow-dot rows are ordering values inside their margins. Today's rank orders current values in the metric's better direction.
Place Latest2020-2024 survey Today's rank Change2015-2019 → 2020-2024 Sig. Change rank History Latest vs. peers
California ref 66.5% +3.8pp
United States ref 68.1% +1.9pp
Winter Haven, FL 70.4% 16th +21.6pp 1st on par with peers
Mount Prospect, IL 74.1% 9th +18.5pp 2nd 5% above peers
Arcadia, CA 70.7% 15th +17.6pp 3rd 1% above peers
Colton, CA 71.5% 14th +17.5pp 4th 2% above peers
Wheaton, IL 73.0% 12th +15.4pp 5th 4% above peers
Diamond Bar, CA 72.6% 13th +15.1pp 6th 3% above peers
San Jacinto, CA 54.2% 31st +10.9pp 7th 23% below peers
Chicopee, MA 82.7% 2nd +14.5pp 8th 18% above peers
Texas City, TX 80.1% 4th +13.9pp 9th 14% above peers
Pensacola, FL 82.8% 1st +14.4pp 10th 18% above peers
Anderson, IN 75.1% 8th +11.2pp 11th 7% above peers
Plainfield, NJ 81.0% 3rd +9.5pp 12th 15% above peers
Pinellas Park, FL 77.0% 6th +6.1pp 13th 9% above peers
Logan, UT 54.3% 30th +2.8pp 14th 23% below peers
Tinley Park, IL 67.9% 18th +3.3pp 15th 4% below peers
Normal, IL 76.8% 7th +3.0pp 16th 9% above peers
Hacienda Heights, CA 64.4% 22nd +1.8pp 17th 9% below peers
Manhattan, KS 73.5% 11th +1.5pp 18th 4% above peers
Kentwood, MI 67.8% 19th +0.7pp 19th 4% below peers
Valdosta, GA 67.9% 17th +0.6pp 20th 3% below peers
Twin Falls, ID 63.5% 25th +0.2pp 21st 10% below peers
Peabody, MA 78.3% 5th -3.5pp 22nd 11% above peers
West Sacramento, CA 63.7% 23rd -4.5pp 23rd 10% below peers
West Haven, CT 66.7% 20th -5.7pp 24th 5% below peers
Yucaipa, CA 57.8% 27th -5.4pp 25th 18% below peers
Rocky Mount, NC 65.6% 21st -10.1pp 26th 7% below peers
Little Elm, TX 63.5% 24th -9.9pp 27th 10% below peers
Westfield, IN 60.2% 26th -11.2pp 28th 14% below peers
Elkhart, IN 56.7% 29th -12.9pp 29th 19% below peers
Galveston, TX 56.9% 28th -17.9pp 30th 19% below peers
Methuen, MA 73.8% 10th 5% above peers
▸ Where is this changing? 11 census tracts
Each tract is colored and ranked by its change from 2019 to 2024, between the same two survey periods as the card above, as a share of its own starting level: blue tracts rose, orange tracts fell. Tracts marked * moved less than their own survey margin, so their color is a direction, not a claim. Hover a tract for its numbers and history, or a table row to find that tract on the map; click either for its location or its data in the Explorer.
DemographicsYoung children with all parents in the labor force
Loading tract map…
6 of 11 tracts cover a shorter window (dashed outline; mostly 2020 boundary changes). Each tract's change uses the same two survey periods as the card above and is judged against the tract's own published margins; tracts marked * moved less than their margin. How the tract view works →
Census ACS 5-year survey (table B23008) through 2024 ±16.4pp at 90% confidence (2024 estimate) survey trend: 2015-2019 vs 2020-2024 surveys about this metric
See all Demographics data →